Do you think that California's marijuana legalization will quell violence along the U.S.-Mexico border?
A RAND Drug Policy Research Center poll concludes that marijuana legalization in California will have little impact on Mexican drug cartels. Californians grow the most domestic pot in the United States, and that only 3% of Mexican marijuana sales are in California.
The study concludes that the only way to cut into cartel's profits would be if legal Californian growers take over Mexican drug traffickers distribution in other parts of the country. In this unlikely scenario the cartels would lose around 20% of their drug export revenues.
Despite this research do you think that California's marijuana legalization would quell violence along the US-Mexican Border?
-
- groups:
- Community, H.E.M.P., Make Marijuana Matter, Cannabis Culture, 9 more
-
- tags:
- Drugs, California, Mexico, Violence, 3 more
-
-
Joe_Medina
-
It has to be nationwide!
- 1 year ago
-
Joe_Medina
-
-
musicjohnny
-
I agree with the study, legalization only in Cali would do little to combat violence on the border when the rest of the country still has to get it illegally. If only 3% of sales of Mexican pot are in Cali, it stands to reason that the remaining 97% is still going to come with a lot of violence. Honestly, even if it was legalized in all 50 states, there would still be a significant illegal drug trade and here's why: do you really think that mexican drug cartels are going to suddenly start paying taxes, import duties, and following regulations like tobacco growers do? Not a chance! They'll still be running drugs in illegally over the border because it'll mean they can sell it for cheaper, and that'll STILL mean violence. The only solution would be to completely seal the border AND provide a way for people in the US to obtain it. That would eliminate the demand for weed from over the border AND make it tough for cartels to run the border and try to compete on price. It'd be lack of demand plus lack of profit. That's the only thing that can stop this.
- 1 year ago
-
musicjohnny
-
-
juicie
-
musicjohnny:
the cartel's wares are all schwag... nobody is going to buy that shit when they can get the sweet sensi...the only reason people buy it now is because they are broke (after it is legal kind will sell for 50 a 1/4...no more 75 an 1/8) or that is all that they can get.
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
musicjohnny
-
juicie:
Good point...I do wonder how cartels would respond to the price drop though....like if they'd match it or not. It certainly seems like they'd try in which case we'd be back in the same situation.
- 1 year ago
-
musicjohnny
-
-
juicie
-
musicjohnny:
you can't get much lower than the prices in El Paso, a major entry point. it is like 30 for an ounce or 300 a pound....the farther away the higher the price. On the east coast it'll go for between 100 to 300 an ounce....I remember when I could get an ounce of sensi for 250...that was like 8 years ago, alas it is 400 to 500 now...I hear they can get it for 125/oz in oregon and cali
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
ayipis
-

-
do you think this guy gives a shit??
people who smokes this shit are weak minded
- 1 year ago
-
ayipis
-
-
floydyboy
-
-
ayipis:
Ahem...
- 1 year ago
-
floydyboy
-
-
jimbones2045
-
-
ayipis:
You should absorb this video. I bet you've seen it plenty of times but you should really get to the end of it and think about things. Your constant generalizing gets old pretty fast, so, for my sake, pay attention.
- 1 year ago
-
jimbones2045
-
-
frank_runyeon
-
-
This is the day to vote! Watch this pod I made before you do:
- 1 year ago
-
frank_runyeon
-
-
Joe_Medina
-
More peace less War!
- 1 year ago
-
Joe_Medina
-
-
ayipis
-
Joe_Medina:
get a job...a respectable job
- 1 year ago
-
ayipis
-
-
provenfire
-
The US government won't recognize the laws that CA passes anyways, so it won't do much...
- 1 year ago
-
provenfire
-
-
provenfire
-
I think it might decrease violence but it will increase the amount of kids using it and getting it from their parents because it's literally growing in their back yard.
If we legalize it, we may make some extra bucks taxing it. $$$ - 1 year ago
-
provenfire
-
-
hammywill
-
provenfire:
It is going to be difficult to legally collect taxes on the sale of marijuana.
- 1 year ago
-
hammywill
-
-
provenfire
-
hammywill:
They've taxed cigarettes so much. I wouldn't be surprised if they do the same in this situation.
- 1 year ago
-
provenfire
-
-
hammywill
-
provenfire:
In order to tax the sale of Marijuana they would have to track those sales. Since the only way to track it is if someone admits selling Marijuana. However the 5th amd protects a person from forceably admitting to committing a crime. Since it is still a FEDERAL crime, the State can not make anyone admit they sold Marijuana, thus it becomes nearly impossible to tax.
- 1 year ago
-
hammywill
-
-
provenfire
-
hammywill:
By legalizing it, people would be able to buy it and sell it legally. That means they can track it. There will be illegal selling but thats inevitable.
- 1 year ago
-
provenfire
-
-
hammywill
-
provenfire:
I am not sure you understand what I am saying. California legalizing Marijuana will not change FEDERAL law. And anyone who admits to selling Marijuana could then be prosecuted in FEDERAL court. Regardless of what the State does. Since it is still a violation of Federal law...the State can not make people admit they sold marijuana. Also, because the state will be in direct contradiction to the Federal drug policy, we will be losing some Federal money used for drug enforcement along the border with Mexico. Money that is not used JUST for Marijuana.
I am in favor of legalized Marijuana, I am just pointing out the GLARING problems this law will create when passed at a State level. If you are willing to fight the good fight, then so am I...and I don't even use Marijuana...;)...FREE CHOICE!!
- 1 year ago
-
hammywill
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
What's weird about all this mess is that these substances once used to be legal. And I believe they've always been legal in the clinical setting.
I think it will most definitely quell the violence, because we went through the same thing in the early 20th century with the outlawing of liquor. At that time the Bonnie and Clyde and Al Capone types took over the underground distribution of it. Moonshining and ridiculous violence ensued. When it was legalized again, much of that nonsense stopped.
Legalization of marijuana in California will quell some of it, but it won't get rid of all the violence, cause there will still be meth and cocaine and crack cocaine to deal with and I don't think they'll ever legalize that stuff, because legal or not, no one likes overindulgence when it comes to those substances except for the person doing it.
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
Joe_Medina
-
QuestionGeek:
Yeah 2 tell u the truth I dont think the violence will stop until everyone learns and educates themselves abot marijuana! The violence will stop when evryone rehabs with bud! cocaine and meth and other drugs are tgods he instigators! marijuana is gods weed! Marijuana will save the world! Food, Fuel, Clothing, And other things this plant is the solution!
- 1 year ago
-
Joe_Medina
-
-
Joe_Medina
-
Once Cali pulls out billions on the table then the rest of the country will jump on board that is how the violence will stop!
- 1 year ago
-
Joe_Medina
-
-
hunzedog
-
how bout a fence and some friggin guns on the border...bet that would stop them.....
- 1 year ago
-
hunzedog
-
-
Nephwrack
-
hunzedog:
yeah. just like de juden?
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
hunzedog:
A fence similar to the way the Berlin Wall was built would work, but for some strange reason no one wants to talk about that
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
melynda
-
When it becomes legal in Cali, and they finally are lifted out of their enormous debt and start prospering again (a word America has forgotten how to use except in a Jeff Foxworthy bit), and the rest of the country goes, "Oh, well, shit, I want some of that too!" and they legalize it, and Americans ALL OVER THE COUNTRY can get their pot locally, then yes, the violence WILL be quelled. Incidentally, all that locally-grown and sold pot will be locally grown and sold by locals, which will obviously boost economies everywhere in every way, and five years later mysterious cancers and psychoses and dementias will start declining due to people not putting little poison pills in their bodies every 4 to 6 hours, and these people will start eating real food again because they can feel what is actually happening inside their organs and their brains (yes I know the brain is an organ). Ahem...........Yes on 19. A butterfly flaps its wings.
- 1 year ago
-
melynda
-
-
fuj
-
melynda:
prop 19 doesn't support local growers. it kinda hinders them.
- 1 year ago
-
fuj
-
-
mr_tibbles
-
melynda:
That sounds lovely. Except I really doubt it will get that far. The federal government is going to sue the shit out of California just like they did Arizona, and since the Supreme Court has already ruled on multiple occasions that federal law trumps state law, they're going to win.
However, the fact that it is even on the ballot and that it's now being discussed as a legitimate source of state revenue is a HUGE milestone in efforts to reform mj laws.
- 1 year ago
-
mr_tibbles
-
-
juicie
-
fuj:
prop 19 does not hinder local growers, your pants are on fire
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
juicie
-
mr_tibbles:
The federal government cannot force CA to have the same punishment or crimes...hence 215 still stands today despite being in conflict.
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
juicie
-
fuj:
The claim that Prop 19 limits the amount a patient can grow is false also. Prop 19 explicitly exempts Prop 215 and SB420; and actually you can grow more than 25 square feet as long as it was for “personal use”. The difference is that the 25 square foot is an amount where you can’t get arrested and beyond that amount the person has a right to defend their grow in court on the grounds it was grown for personal use, SO ACTUALLY PROP 19 ALLOWS YOU TO GROW MORE THAN YOU COULD EVER DREAM OF AND AS AN ATTORNEY DEFENDING THESE CASES, I’D MUCH RATHER HAVE THIS STRAIGHT-FORWARD LAW THAN THE TECHNICAL INTRICACIES OF A MEDICAL DEFENSE. This means the end of prohibition within short order as law enforcement, the courts and the system would collapse if they prosecuted every person or even half of the new growers. The end is near people. This is called “opening the flood gates, a term invented by prohibitionists as they know what happens to prohibition when you crack the door open.
--from J. David Nick, who was Steve Kubby’s lawyer and successfully defended him for 200 plants, who was Dennis Peron’s lawyer and successfully defended him for his medical cannabis sales, and who has never lost a medical marijuana case in a California court
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
juicie
-
melynda:
Exactly...if 19 passes then in the long run it will lead to the rest of the country coming around, and essentially killing off the market for mexican black market schwag. In the short term it will mean an increase in supply which will go to other states that command higher prices and when people have a choice between high grade and schwag they will pick the higher grade, and thus decrease demand for the mexican brick. I wont buy that schwag even if it was the only thing available, but obviously some people buy it, which is why it is still around. So even in the short term it will help.
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
melynda:
Are you surprised I voted yes on 19?
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
Joe_Medina
-
I think it will cut their budget no more weapons purchases which means less violence. Grow your own!
- 1 year ago
-
Joe_Medina
-
-
Chris_Corl
-
Will it have an impact on Mexico?
Not really.The effect of herbal complacency on California will be interesting to watch though.
I used to smoke with regularity then stopped as I got sober.
I returned to S.F. 7 years later and the picture I returned to was a life that time forgot. The people I had left behind were exactly the same, working the same jobs, living in the same fantasies and going nowhere.Their lives now are in shambles because they did not progress they simply did nothing.
- 1 year ago
-
Chris_Corl
-
-
indecisiveh
-
Chris_Corl:
and the moral is..........
..................or is this just a tangent? - 1 year ago
-
indecisiveh
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
Chris_Corl:
Chris, as eloquent as you are, you'll never be able to explain that point to someone who smokes pot regularly and is in the grips of addiction. You see their life spiraling downward and they'll fight you tooth and nail to keep it going that way. The same can be said for alcohol addiction. And gee, that stuff is legal.
I get lambasted regularly on here for my views regarding marijuana/ drug and alcohol use, because few people like to hear truth, they only want to hear what they want to hear.
Legalization of marijuana might quell some of the violence, but it will do nothing to stop it all together because there are still other substances that will remain at street distribution level that drug cartels will want to have control of, mainly cocaine. I didn't mention meth because meth is made from stuff you can buy at any drug store and any store that sells cleaners, detergents, polishes, glues, etc..
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
Ares
-
No, but maybe the 20 year old Police Chief in Guadalupe will get some work done and inspire the rest of the country.
Just kidding, Mexico is a shit hole and nothing that we do in the United States is going to change that. Why is the United States always the focal point when problems with Mexico are discussed? They are fucked up, they need to deal with it. Fuck Mexico.
- 1 year ago
-
Ares
-
-
Nephwrack
-
Ares:
so why dont you tell us how you really feel? lol. wait. you already did.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
jimbones2045
-
Ares:
That's a little blunt, don't ya think?
Any compassion for another human being?
You could say the same about Iraq and Afghanistan with that kinda logic.
"[The middle east] is a shit hole and nothing that we do in the United States is going to change that. Why is the United States always the focal point when problems with [the middle east] are discussed? They are fucked up, they need to deal with it. Fuck [the middle east].
- 1 year ago
-
jimbones2045
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
Ares:
Because they don't have the sacrificial cahones to do anything about it. Mexico IS seriously fucked up. Why is it that because they can't keep their penises in their pants and their legs closed it somehow becomes the USA's problem? Have they ever heard of birth control?
And here's some examples of what I'm talking about when I say they're fucked up.....
1. In Mazatlan while traveling with my lover 2 years ago, a guy opened the door to his apartment and wanted us to have sex with his 4 year old daughter and him (for a price of course) You think the USA has no morals? You ain't seen nothing till you've visited Mexico. In Mexico, it's all out in the open.
2. A similar thing happened ten years ago with my then boyfriend while we were touring Tijuana. A whore opened the door to her van and wanted us both to hop in and bone her.
3. Thousands of illegal immigrants cross the border every day. If you ask anyone of them the real reason they do it, it's because they cannot find work in Mexico and they'll try to cross the border time and time again until they make it. Why is it that because they can't keep their penises in their pants and their legs closed it somehow becomes the USA's problem? Why don't they channel some of that energy in making real political change?
The drug cartel IS their government and they can't do anything about it. That IS seriously fucked up.
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
H3ADLINE
-
I think marijuana prohibition is an insanely self-defeating policy, so I do support the measure in California to end it. However, the effect it may have on Mexican drug cartels in the short term is hard to predict. It will ultimately mean decreased revenue and influence, but there will be a struggle before they surrender their primary income.
Given that so much of their revenue stream comes from marijuana sales in the US alone, it is likely that we'll start seeing front groups set up to funnel the legal profits back to them. They have a distinct lead in the market already, with boots on the ground and connections to sellers and their clients, so this would be the next logical step for them. If that proves largely unsuccessful in the saturated cannabis market of California, which I think it quickly will once legal capacity rises to meet demand, they likely will mobilize their gangs to step up the production and trade of other illegal goods to make up for the loss in the marijuana sector.
What happens in this downsizing/restructuring will be interesting and chaotic. I suspect a small increase in desperation, violence, and unemployment in the black market as new faces try to rise to the top, and old ones lose credibility and control. Growers will gain a great deal of money initially from the new consumers and advertising legalization provides (which should help them transition from organized crime), but as the full market becomes competitive, the price bubble will quickly burst, leaving many with nothing. This could lead to an effort by the cartels to fund those who lose out in order to keep in the market, but even this measure only delays their inevitable decline. Many dealers will lose their livelihood, and those that stay will have to cope with the growing corporate consolidation of their industry. Or better yet, fight to make it local and responsible instead of corporate.
Some gangs will find it hard to keep afloat without resorting to other means for income. Guns are their currency with the Mexican bosses in exchange for marijuana, so expect a surplus of American guns cutting their price on the street. This could, hypothetically, fuel a small-scale arms race to make up for the lack of income, as gangs are prone to rash action in the face of changing conditions.
This happened after alcohol prohibition ended, and when newer drugs like crack cocaine made it to the markets in the 1980's, with upstart groups fighting violently for control. This turbulent transition should pass quickly for California for two important reasons: the cartels are only losing one state for revenue, and they are too financially strained in an expensive war in Mexico to exert much influence. But don't be surprised in the future when you read of how the cartels fought to keep other states from following California's lead. They will fight as long as they can, and so must we.
- 1 year ago
-
H3ADLINE
-
-
Adam_Estes
-
it is alwayse darkest before dawn i think we should all buy a gun and start smoking weed protect yourself and get high
- 1 year ago
-
Adam_Estes
-
-
hammywill
-
It will be very difficult to collect taxes on Marijuana sales. By declaring that you bought or sold Marijuana you are being forced to admit to violating Federal Law, and states have run afoul of this issue before. The state can not make a person declare they are in violation of Federal Law. It all depends on how Obama decides to handle this with his instructions to the DEA.
- 1 year ago
-
hammywill
-
-
ras_menelik
-
No but it's a start
- 1 year ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
oneshopping32 [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
oneshopping32 [removed]
-
-
simplecj
-
If the whole US would legalize it, the cartels would be out of business. I think the 20% mark is a bit low. Other reports have estimated the cartels heavily rely on income from cannabis, making up as much as 60 - 80% of their profits.
California will no doubt experience greater demand from the other 49 states. The demand is already evident in Mendocino county where growers have quickly multiplied over the last decade or so. Being the only state with legalization will only make it worse. All states should legalize so that the domestic distribution can be done legally and in a far more balanced manner.
My question is, if California passes this law, shouldn't the government be FORCED to re-evaluate and re-classify cannabis under the guidelines of the controlled substances act? It clearly states that a substance is to be evaluated on current studies and available information. Apparently 15 states with legal medicinal laws isn't enough to get them to move.... will Prop 19 be the final straw?
- 1 year ago
-
simplecj
-
-
simplecj
-
simplecj:
Per the findings of the Shaffer Commission of the early 1970's (when the controlled substances act was initiated), cannabis should never have been included on the dangerous substances list and certainly should never have been considered a Schedule 1 substance. That fact alone flies in the face of everything science and society know about cannabis. We can blame Nixon for continuing the ignorance of cannabis prohibition.
(1) Schedule I.—
(A) The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.
(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision." [20]
No prescriptions may be written for Schedule I substances, and such substances are subject to production quotas by the DEA.
Points B and C certainly are not indicative of cannabis and point A is debatable. The part about prescriptions also contradicts the FDA approved pharmaceutical Marinol, which is 100% THC.
Seriously, why is cannabis still considered a Schedule 1 substance?? That is the underlying issue with American policy, we're basing our legal stance concerning cannabis to a completely false classification.
- 1 year ago
-
simplecj
-
-
billssqueeze
-
simplecj:
I doubt it. Our government's willingness to spread ignorance knows no limits
- 1 year ago
-
billssqueeze
-
-
billssqueeze
-
simplecj:
well said
- 1 year ago
-
billssqueeze
-
-
Varex_Sythe
-
Why would it?
- 1 year ago
-
Varex_Sythe
-
-
sidewaysclyde
-
Might not stop border violence - but it will probably stop domestic home invasions/violence related to cannabis because of the effect it will have on the local black market. At least I hope it does.
I think the cartels on the border will probably switch crops or start funneling it to other regions.
- 1 year ago
-
sidewaysclyde
-
-
freecrack
-
not in the slightest, as a regulated market is still a market none the less.we all at some point have had a knock off something.adidass pants with the four stripes, or the fooboo shirt.
they will continue to grow, and distribute it regardless of what we do.it could actualy turn them into a corperate empire actualy, just one with baord room walls covered in spattered blood.remember pablo escobar was a congressman.does it even matter really, being that cocaine is thier bigger investment not weed?
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
ebanforpeace
-
can it make the violence worse?
- 1 year ago
-
ebanforpeace
-
-
billssqueeze
-
ebanforpeace:
violence is attributed to the feds involvement more then any other factor
- 1 year ago
-
billssqueeze
-
-
serenden68
-
a poll is only going to give what peoples opinion of the matter is. its not going to actually predict the future in certain cases.
it is obvious that one state alone commiting this act is not going to stop an orginization that operates on a global scale. however, history has shown that when california does something "drastic" some states follow suit, and this would create a domino effect.
also crime rates trippling is something someone pulled out their ass, cuz it sure smells like shit. if anything crime would lower. with cannabis readily available in a safer environment to law abiding citizens, drug deals would decline therefore revenue for crime activity would take a hit... which would result in lower crime rates... one way cartels would be effected..
another thing effecting crime would be the fact that police would actually be able to catch criminals instead of otherwise hard working, tax paying americans.
what i dont understand is why peole want the drug cartels to keep their cash cow in anyway shape or form. does it really matter if it would only effect the cartels a little? its better than the no where we are getting from the nothing we are doing.
- 1 year ago
-
serenden68
-
-
hunzedog
-
legalize cannabis.....
- 1 year ago
-
hunzedog
-
-
ayipis
-
you guys are simply not getting it...LOL..then either the Mexican cartel moves in stateside or we replace the Mexican cartel with California Cartel..
legalization would TRIPLE the violence as the forces starts to shift..but then again when shit hits the fan..these dope heads always blame either the martians or jesus christ..
just think of it this way..we are listening to a bunch of people who needs to BE DOPED UP to function...
- 1 year ago
-
ayipis
-
-
Nephwrack
-
ayipis:
it's my opinion that your opinion is laughable at best. california cartel? what have *you* been smoking? the only stateside cartel that anyone should be worried about is the D.E.A.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
freecrack
-
ayipis:
out of curiosity, did repealing prohibition create an alcohol cartel?
um it is the sober who addict themselves to jesus and martians.the drug addled care not for such nonsense.
i wouldnt be talking about requirements to function if i were you.not really a stong suite for you.
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
sidewaysclyde
-
ayipis:
history - there's a class you can take if you care about it - might learn a thing or two about prohibition.
- 1 year ago
-
sidewaysclyde
-
-
billssqueeze
-
ayipis:
should ask your Dr. his or her professional opinion, I'm sure you'll be surprised
- 1 year ago
-
billssqueeze
-
-
ThoughtNu
-
-
ayipis:
After readinging you identify such requirements to function, with rock solid logic of whom to blame...
I sat back and few thc breaks later , counting to ten ... fifty times. I ask, Why not Spock?
Real People, real violence, real concerns ...
I just got to ask if you... ever sang,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4HcVMaAcII
... means well ,chemical imbalance, indifference? - 1 year ago
-
ThoughtNu
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
freecrack:
Excuse me, I'm sober, always have been, I'll take art and porn over smoking my brains out anyday. I've never been into Jesus freaks and refused to go to Sunday school when I was a kid.
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
freecrack
-
QuestionGeek:
thats nice.but i wasnt talking about you.i was speaking in general terms about human nature.im sure you are the center of your world, but i really wasnt talking about you in the slightest.
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
QuestionGeek
-
freecrack:
Well when you are making generalizations shouldn't you specify as such? You started your sentence as, "It's the sober ~...."? Doesn't that indicate EVERYONE that has the indication to do things while sober of which there are many?
- 1 year ago
-
QuestionGeek
-
-
freecrack
-
QuestionGeek:
of the people who addict themselves to jesus, sobriety isnt question, despite them being addicted to him.so much so living every moment of every day for him.shit even a junkie needs some sober time, in order to enjoy thier high comparatively.
if you think i was making a statement about sober people, u are insane.sober is our natural state, not a group of people.its all of us, not a segment.
you specify when you are talking about specifics, it is the lack of specifying that makes it a generality.to state in general is a redundancy when making a general statement.
"in general human nature" as human nature, refers to the general, not a specific group when talking about human beings, as they all fit under general terms.now "gang member behavior" would be a need to specify, as they are human and generaly people dont behaive like them.
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
WorkbyDayPiratebyNight
-
To the OP no it wont make a difference, but think of it like this if Alc was illegal again and lets say MJ would be equal beer and hard liquor would equal cocaine,
for a portion of ppl it would be fine, they could now drink beer legally and that would take profit out of mafia/cartels. But because Hard Liquor would still be illegal there would still be market and therefore a way for mafia/Cartels to make easy money on it.(sorry just woke up not sure if that makes sense lol)
- 1 year ago
-
WorkbyDayPiratebyNight
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
WorkbyDayPiratebyNight:
i fucking love your screen name
- 1 year ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
UtopianSky
-
Legalization of alcohol did not stop the Mafia,
so legalization of pot will not stop the cartels.They will just shift to a new crop.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
serenden68
-
UtopianSky:
whenis the last time u heard anything about the mafia?
and noit didnt stop the mafia, but alcohol legalization certainly reduced the violence and introduced the united states to one of the largest industrys it has...
now that wont happen with just california legalizing, but there would be a domino effect with other states that are also considering legalization or decriminalization. then the FED govt. would actually have to take the time to tend to this matter which is a lot bigger than everyone thinks whether for or against.
- 1 year ago
-
serenden68
-
-
UtopianSky
-
serenden68:
When was the last time I heard anything about the Mafia?
Yesterday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/15/nyregion/15waterfront.htmlI am FOR legalization.
I am just saying it will have no impact on the cartels. - 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
Nephwrack
-
a poll doesn't prove anything other than the prevailing opinion, if that. voted down.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
Most of the marijuana smoked in the US is homegrown anyway. I am Pro Marijuana legalization, but the reason is not to stop the border violence.
This issue is much deeper than legalizing a single substance. The problem is with the Mexican governments culture of corruption. They fall prey to bribes from the cartels to easily. Alot of the Government leaders are in the cartels themselves!
The goal of the mexican drug war is not to stop all drug trafficking. The goal is to give advantage to one cartel over the other.
For instance: The military will give the sinaloa cartel free roam in order to take out a rival cartel like the Zetas, a more violent and brutal gang. The result is massive civilian casualties and no less violence than you had before.
This is not sustainable, you cannot fight a drug war half-a**ed or take sides for that matter.
The Mexican government needs to be held accountable for their criminal negligence and stripped of all drug war related funding
- 1 year ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
tommic
-
ibrake4rappers13:
I must say ib4r13 that is the most clear headed and substancial thoughtout statement you have made that I can agree with in a long time. Shit happens!! Good for you to recognize that its not the drugs its the people who are corrupted by them. Legalization is right and decriminalization of hard drugs is next, they are addicts, they only become criminals to support that addiction, methadone while not a panecea is better than crime and paying for jail time for offenders cost society far more than drug treatment and also contraceptives for those who are drug addicts who need not bring another child into the world where they start with two strikes.
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
jubal
-
ibrake4rappers13:
One thing you forgot to mention...btw (excellent response!!!) is that people in our government and high level leaders in border enforcement, ICE, and police chiefs, sheriffs and officers near the border are on Cartel payrolls.
- 1 year ago
-
jubal
-
-
Nephwrack
-
ibrake4rappers13:
AGREED good sir. agreed.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
daveinLA
-
jubal:
I have 2 relatives in the DEA and they say VERY few agents are "on the take" in USA. On the Mexican side they say very few AREN'T on the take.
- 1 year ago
-
daveinLA
-
-
Nephwrack
-
daveinLA:
what are they supposed to say? oh yeah we're all taking payola. lol you make me laugh.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
indecisiveh
-
ibrake4rappers13:
You just watch the new episode of weeds didn't you....
- 1 year ago
-
indecisiveh
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
indecisiveh:
No, I never really got into that show. The last episode i remember watching was the one where the ladies neighborhood was on fire and wanted to quit selling weed. I didnt even know there was a new season, heck i thought that show was cancelled. Mostly because i dont have access to cable let alone the movie channels.
But why do you say that? Was there something on that show similar to what I said?
- 1 year ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
JohnA
-
No
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
jubal
-
It will have an impact...but the cartels are going into a different line of work now...coming across the border, kidnapping Americans, and then holding them for ransom in Mexico...forget marijuana...its small potatoes compared to the new more lucrative trade.
- 1 year ago
-
jubal
-
-
daveinLA
-
jubal:
I completely agree.
- 1 year ago
-
daveinLA
-
-
macready
-
Legalization of marijuana, a vestigial issue in the so-called American culture wars, will (a) save money as fewer nonviolent "offenders" are incarcerated, (b) generate revenue as a new legal taxable good is legitimately introduced into the state economy, and (c) contribute to reducing violence along the border as American demand for Mexican marijuana is significantly reduced. People go to jail for marijuana possession but cigarettes are still legal? That makes a lot of sense.
- 1 year ago
-
macready
-
-
olddogdaddy
-
it can't get any worse; apparently, logic is not a driving force for ANY of our 'representatives' so it is not likely....
- 1 year ago
-
olddogdaddy
-
-
UrbanGypsy
-
Criminals will always find something illegal to do. If marijuana is legalized, others will spring up to fill in some other illegal activity.
The point is not that they want to make money of off marijuana, the point is that they want to make money the easy way, the illegal way. If that means selling marijuana then so be it, but as soon as that is no longer illegal, they will move to something else.
Criminal cartels always deal beyond the bounds of legality. And for as long as there are things that are illegal (which there will always be) there will always be crime cartels that live off of it.
- 1 year ago
-
UrbanGypsy
-
-
DogBoy
-
I don't think that it could hurt any. We already have a small border war going on so what the hell.
- 1 year ago
-
DogBoy
-
-
CalgarC
-
no maan!..
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
cheshiresleeves
-
No, I don't think so. There might be an issue if all of the US made it legal and therefor we took a lot of their business, but I really doubt it. There are scarier things to be afraid of than "Crazy Mexican Cartels seeking revenge because mary j is finally legal". There will always be violence everywhere human beings and money are together. And that is regardless of skin color. DOWNED
- 1 year ago
-
cheshiresleeves
-
-
DogBoy
-
cheshiresleeves:
Agreed
- 1 year ago
-
DogBoy
-
-
sanzen3
-
Of course it won't, this is a dumb question to ask. California is one state out of fifty. If the country were to legalize marijuana then it would have an affect on the cartels and the violence they create. Legalization in California will just be step one of a fifty step process.
- 1 year ago
-
sanzen3
-
-
DogBoy
-
sanzen3:
Screw the cartels. Who cares if we take away some of their business. Who cares what they like.
- 1 year ago
-
DogBoy
-
-
Nephwrack
-
tverdell:
just the zonies that flock to san diego every year all acting like douchebags will bring in tons of money for this.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
freecrack
-
tverdell:
a slight bump, but i dont think anything substabtial.
i mean as it is we all know you can move to cali and get a weed liscence, yet we dont.
maybe it is the lack of addictive properties, or the lethargy weed causes.
but aside from thho frequent amsterdam we really arent moved by weed - 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
cabinettags
-
sanzen3:
I don't know if the question itself is dumb; but I agree with your point.
- 1 year ago
-
cabinettags
-
-
juicie
-
cabinettags:
To reiterate Sanzen3's point, we can't get to fifty without that first step
- 1 year ago
-
juicie
-
-
cabinettags
-
juicie:
Ike & Mike; we think alike. I sure hope the voters can bring home the bacon.
- 1 year ago
-
cabinettags
-
-
- joshuaheller
- added this
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
- more