Community | June 14, 2008 | 38 comments

Man cures cancer and oil problem with 1 invention?

dankitti
Is this a cure for at least one of those, or a trick or some kind of hoax?
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Green
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Green Cancer 3 more
  3.     
    |

38 comments // Man cures cancer and oil problem with 1 invention?

  • gwbask
    • 0
      gwbask  
    • No one is offering solutions to high gas prices. All we get is excuses and the run around. Take time to visit this web site. if you want to see a solution to the gas situation visit http://www.wesaidnomore.com. This site offers a way where we citizens can take back some sort of control and exercise our power and rights as consumers and voters. It's a little radical but it will work. That's "We said no more"
      Thanks

      Gary

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • gwbask
    • 0
      gwbask  
    • MoonLoon:

      No one is offering solutions to high gas prices. All we get is excuses and the run around. Take time to visit this web site. if you want to see a solution to the gas situation visit http://www.wesaidnomore.com. This site offers a way where we citizens can take back some sort of control and exercise our power and rights as consumers and voters. It's a little radical but it will work. That's "We said no more"
      Thanks

      Gary

    • 3 years ago
  • dark0Donnie
  • gwbask
    • 0
      gwbask  
    • dark0Donnie:

      No one is offering solutions to high gas prices. All we get is excuses and the run around. Take time to visit this web site. if you want to see a solution to the gas situation visit http://www.wesaidnomore.com. This site offers a way where we citizens can take back some sort of control and exercise our power and rights as consumers and voters. It's a little radical but it will work. That's "We said no more"
      Thanks

      Gary

    • 3 years ago
  • JenniEuphoria
  • atee
    • 0
      atee  
    • gov't will be slow to move on anything, sadly. despite our dire need for clean energy.

      ...so what would happen if you took that machine to the ocean?

    • 3 years ago
  • dmtdan
  • gwbask
    • 0
      gwbask  
    • dmtdan:

      No one is offering solutions to high gas prices. All we get is excuses and the run around. Take time to visit this web site. if you want to see a solution to the gas situation visit http://www.wesaidnomore.com. This site offers a way where we citizens can take back some sort of control and exercise our power and rights as consumers and voters. It's a little radical but it will work. That's "We said no more"
      Thanks

      Gary

    • 3 years ago
  • beedee
    • 0
      beedee  
    • Wow. That's Erie [PA]!

      I used to live in Akron and even did the website design for APV Engineering. If they turn out to have contributed to verifying one of the most amazing discoveries of my lifetime I'll be very proud to have been connected to that project.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mbrierley
  • Leonidis
  • JenniEuphoria
  • MoMoney
    • 0
      MoMoney  
    • I am not sure if I believe this... Why would we hear about it from him and not some corporation who has bought his idea? I hope it is but I am a little skeptical... Would be great though. I wonder if we would abuse it?

    • 3 years ago
  • Owwmykneecap
  • LucienRafagas
  • GavinTheMother
  • covelogibbs
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • Both excellent ideas. People should be lining up to buy his research or sign him up to head a multi-national project, however I think this may just get bought out or buried. Our government thrives and profits over people's suffering, they are not in the business of healing.

    • 3 years ago
  • JJSwanson
  • mrpibb19
    • 0
      mrpibb19  
    • Removing the hydrogen either leaves us with hydroxide (-OH) or oxide (O2)... These "waste" gases the hydrogen plants will produce is much better than the harmful pollutants we release now (CO2, O3...). Sounds like a good idea in retrospect, although it will take years of study and innovation.

    • 3 years ago
  • Audiogeek
    • 0
      Audiogeek  
    • I could be wrong but don't we need water to live?

      NEXT!

      The Cancer thing was astounding...I've always wanted to do research on the effect of Radio Frequencies and the human body.

    • 3 years ago
  • electricsquiral
    • 0
      electricsquiral  
    • Audiogeek:

      Watter watter everywhere, and not a drop to drink? If we use this to power ships they could have a new fuel source more abundant then nuclear power. surface ships would be literally sitting in there own fuel supply.

    • 3 years ago
  • 1779fleet
  • mediasetfree
    • 0
      mediasetfree  
    • Wow a modern day Nikola Tesla, what happened to Tesla's break throughs? Oh yeah, the government confiscated them and called them top secret.

    • 3 years ago
  • 1779fleet
  • jahbini
    • 0
      jahbini  
    • To Argon18: No, burning oxygen and hydrogen produces water. It really IS a clean fuel.

      From an energy standpoint, though, it probably is a bad idea: It will not be useful unless the amount of energy (radio waves) used is less than the energy (burning) produced.

      And by the way, the mixture of hydrogen and oxygen that is produced is incredibly dangerous! It burns and can explode if confined.

    • 3 years ago
  • cerealforeal
    • 0
      cerealforeal  
    • That's amazing, but I won't be surprised when the U.S. government doesn't fund yet another great idea. They would rather fund a missile that pummels the earth's surface and kills everything living around it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • I was wondering that myself, how much energy does it take to produce the radio waves.

      You would think it would be fairly easy in principle to replace that system with the gas in a hybrid car then let the batter produce the electricy to run the radio and the burning hydrogen produce the energy to charge the batteries.

      I'm not exactly sure if it would solve the problem though, since wouldn't burning water produce a lot of CO2 also?

    • 3 years ago
  • electricsquiral
    • 0
      electricsquiral  
    • Argon18:

      CO2? saltwater contains sodium, chlorine, hydrogen, and oxygen. There is no carbon to form the carbon dioxide. The usual source for CO2 pollution is the burning of hydrocarbon fuels, like coal, oil, natural gas, and biomass.

    • 3 years ago
  • gwbask
    • 0
      gwbask  
    • Argon18:

      No one is offering solutions to high gas prices. All we get is excuses and the run around. Take time to visit this web site. if you want to see a solution to the gas situation visit http://www.wesaidnomore.com. This site offers a way where we citizens can take back some sort of control and exercise our power and rights as consumers and voters. It's a little radical but it will work. That's "We said no more"
      Thanks

      Gary

    • 3 years ago
  • iknew
  • absentbree
  • Bravura
  • notsure
  • PoisonTheMonkey
    • 0
      PoisonTheMonkey  
    • I hope this is real. I hope that huge amounts of sea water won't be taken from the ocean--that it will be used responsibly.

      This is truly amazing if it IS true. If not, then damn I'm easy to fool.

    • 3 years ago
  • 1MillionMonkeys
  • dankitti
more from Community:
from the community

top videos