Community | June 30, 2008 | 92 comments

Queen of Hawaii demands independence from U.S.

Image
stone246
The United States is an illegal occupying force that should hand the 132 islands of Hawaii back to the monarchy overthrown more than a century ago, according to members of a Native Hawaiian sovereignty movement.

For almost two months, the self-proclaimed Hawaiian Kingdom Government has peacefully occupied the grounds of the Iolani Palace, residence of the islands' last two monarchs, operating a shadow government from a tent erected in its stately grounds.

Her Majesty Mahealani Kahau, a descendant of Hawaii's last king who was elected "head of state" by the group, and her ministers gather each day to debate how to achieve their goal of restoring Native Hawaiian rule.The group, which claims 1,000 followers, is demanding the dissolution of the State of Hawaii and the return of land and bank assets totalling billions of dollars.

Hawaii has about 200,000 Native Hawaiians, or kânaka maoli, out of a population of 1.3 million. The Hawaiian Kingdom Government is just one of a number of sovereignty groups, many with similar names, waging independence campaigns.

All aim to "right the wrong" inflicted on Native Hawaiians in 1893 when a small, mostly American group of sugar plantation owners and other businessmen overthrew the Hawaiian monarchy with the support of US troops sent ashore from a Navy warship.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   WTF,   4 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics WTF 11 more
  3.     
    |

92 comments // Queen of Hawaii demands independence from U.S.

  • Clarence_Ahnee
    • -1
      Clarence_Ahnee  
    • BEFORE YOU LOLO (STUPID) NON HAWAIIANS VOICE YOUR NEGATIVE COMMENTS CONCERNING THE KINGDOM OF HAWAII, HEAD OF STATE. MAHEALANI KAHAU AND THE LAHUI (PEOPLE) LEARN EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO HAWAII WHEN THE FIRST NON HAWAIIANS CAME TO OUR AINA (LAND) AND WHAT WE WENT THROUGH! HAWAII WAS NEVER A STATE. ANOTHER LIE. HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF SOMEONE STOLE YOUR LAND? THE HAWAIIAN LAHUI LOVES EVERYBODY IN THIS WORLD BECAUSE OF THE GOD WE SERVE TODAY AND FOREVER...YOU INTRODUCED CHRISTIANITY TO OUR PEOPLE OR DID YOU FORGET...JUDGEMENT DAY WILL COME...ALOHA...

    • 1 year ago
  • donkeyfly69
  • Kepano
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • moonloon: are you reading with your eyes closed? it seems like every time someone has something to say you ignore it and say what you want instead of responding.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • donkeyfly69:

      I'm sorry, Donkeyfly, but I do not agree with your assessment. As suggested by other posters I checked out the history of Hawaii, and reported what I read. My facts about WWII are well supported by the behavior of Japan starting in 1937, with the Rape Of Nangking, and leading up to their attack on Pearl Harbor. Then there was the massacre of thousands of Phillipino civilians and beheadings, and murders of American POW's in the Pacific theater. I respond with facts. If other posters cannot support their claims with facts and insist on presenting half truths and outright untruths. I claim the right to dispute them. Hawaii voted to be a member state of the U.S., this is a fact. They were doomed to fall to an Industrial society at some time and the U.S. was preferable to Germany or Japan. Would you be happy if I just agreed with a series of comments not based in truth? I understand indigenous people needing respect for their culture. I also, know that World History tells us that conquerors have little respect for the conquered! The current Hawaiian "Royalty" came to power by enslaving the original settlers, the "Marquesan Islanders". This is a fact, not supposition, so I should shut up up because the truth is painful? I think not!

    • 3 years ago
  • usman6
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • Thanks to my esteemed colleagues on this topic, I re-read the history of Hawaii. It seems that the current claim of the "Queen", must be invalidated, as her family line are mere interlopers/invaders. The Marquesans settled Hawaii originally before being enslaved by the Tahitians, (Polynesians), therefore the current claims are not recognized. If a Royal line of Marquesans, can be established , there may be a point to this complaint. Otherwise, Polynesians have no more claim to Hawaii, than any other invader!
      I will discuss Thor Heyerdhal's Theory if neccesary, thus weakening the Polynesians claims, even more.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • I guess now that Paradise is lost somone must be blamed. Let's blame the U.S. because they have the most money! Every Non-Industrialized Society has been at risk for the last 400 years. Should we subsidise a culture in decline? It will not work. They will eventually decline, due to an inability to adjust to the Industrial World. It is inevitable. The strong overcome the weak, it is the way of the World.

    • 3 years ago
  • bekah_1984
    • 0
      bekah_1984  
    • MoonLoon:

      Yeah, we're the richest country... We only have a 10+ BILLION dollar trade deficit. We rank 6th in the richest countries in the world. And your statement makes absolutely no sense. They are a US state. The US is who made them a part of the US. They are wanting to leave the US. Who should they declare they are wanting to break from then? China? Please, please, please use common sense. In all your postings on this topic, nothing you have said makes sense. Is it really that hard to google some information? To learn something? If they are a US state and decide they do not want to be a US state anymore, then they are going to HAVE to take that up with the US. For no other reason. Not because of money or for alliances. Because they are the ones with whom Hawaii is part of.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • MoonLoon:

      Bekah, they voted to be a U.S. State. We do not seize a state without the majority of voters approving it. Now that is approved they cannot back out. Even if they tried, it would be defeated by a majority of votes. 200,000 Polynesians cannot outvote 1.5 million, haoles, that have been allowed to own land since 1848 by order of the King! This is just another money grab! They may have gotten a bad deal 150 years ago, but blame their their leaders, not us. I am sure that the Indians that sold Manhattan for $24.00 in beads would like to restructure the deal, but I do not think it will happen.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • jvanauken
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • I just noticed that this was a U.K. news release. Why doesn't the U.K. give the Falklands back to the original "owners"? If they support the U.S. giving Hawaii sovereignty, why not the Falklands?
      People in glass houses should not throw stones!

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • Is there anyone on the site over 25 years old? Have you all forgotten WWII? Japan would have overrun Hawaii and murdered men, women, and children, just as they did at Nangking. I am willing to bet that the King or Queen of Hawaii would not be demanding sovereignty in the face of the Japanese War Machine. Every Island in the South Pacific owes the U.S. a debt of gratitude for defeating the Japanese. Pay back the U.S. for the war effort and lives lost and then ask for independence! The Pacific Islanders, Australians, and everyone else was terrified of the Japanese. They were brutal, they murdered, raped, and tortured at will, and every islander knew this to be true.

    • 3 years ago
  • dcrc9596
    • 0
      dcrc9596  
    • I think that they should be compensated by Dole company for what they did to them, overthrowing a government is wrong. But I hope they don't try to cede from the US because we all saw what happened with the civil war, once the US government claims something they will kill it to keep it. Truthfully if they could pull it off half the rest of the nation would bail on them too. Just think if we ended up like the EU. We wouldn't have to have a president screw us all over like Bush did, he would only be abel to screw the states he won in! Sounds better than the way things are, but just pipe dreams corporate America owns us all and has essentially stolen all of America and enslaved us all. We live to work and not work to live. We work longer hour than any other developed nation and we have less benefits!! What the US did to Hawaii sucks, so did the genicide committed against the Native Americans, and they have not and probably never will be punished for it!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • dcrc9596:

      Exactly what did we do to them? We stopped the Japanese from raping, murdering, and destroying their civilization. Thousands of American boys spilled their blood on far away beaches, to protect America, Hawaii, and hundreds/thousands of isolated island people that the Japanese would have tortured, raped, and killed, as they did throughout WWII. What is your problem? Are you clueless to the facts of WWII?

      Isn't it wonderful to be young and forget the sacrifices of other young people, 60 years ago. You hide behind a computer, yet never know the sacrifices paid to put you here. You are a pitiful excuse for the blood paid to allow you to sit in luxury and denigrate the value of young men's lives!

      You make me disgusted with the youth of America!

    • 3 years ago
  • bekah_1984
    • 0
      bekah_1984  
    • I think that if the people of Hawaii wish to return to a monarchy, then they have the absolute right to do so. ESPECIALLY if they are direct natives to the island and not tourists or rich people who are just there for the scenery. The natives are the ones who's opinion matter. It was their islands before we took them. I think that people forget that there were a multitude of people in American BEFORE the Europeans arrived.

      Puerto Rico reminds me of this. They are a part of the US in that, their chief of state is our President yet they refuse to become a state within our government. This is the peoples choice. They chose to only be selectively involved with the US. And I do not see why it would be a big deal for Hawaii to want to separate from the US. The fact is that America is very lazy and they would rather have unhappy people and not have to work to update text books and flags than to actually go about changing things for the better of this state. I say that if Hawaii wants to become independent, then go for it. I think that if the people are tired of US control, then they have the absolute right to change it.

      As for the comment on the US needing to read its own history, sadly that will never happen. Children are still taught that Christopher Columbus founded America. Apparently they never thought to teach us where the name "America" even comes from (Try googling Amerigo Vespucci). And that's more recent history as opposed to the millions of Native Americans that lived throughout the continent that eventually were mass murdered by disease and due to fear that the settlers came with.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • bekah_1984:

      O.K. that sounds good to me! Now I demand that every Hawaiian on U.S. soil be returned to their Island. We will of course confiscate their property, they cannot collect Social Security, or other Welfare benefits. Then we will deliver an invoice to the Queen demanding compensation for the defense of Hawaii, during WWII.

    • 3 years ago
  • bekah_1984
    • 0
      bekah_1984  
    • bekah_1984:

      What would they need SS benefits and welfare if they created their own government. They would create their own benefits program for their own people. Obviously they wouldn't get that kind of assistance. And if we forced every Hawaiian back to Hawaii then we wouldn't be much of a free country thank would it. It would be the only country that we did not offer citizenship to people willing to stay. Not to mention that those who are US citizens now are protected from action due to amnesty issues within the ex post facto laws (if things were to become serious enough for ex post facto) and I doubt that it would. And that deporting thousands of people costs money- which the US only likes to spend on military and defense.

      As for confiscating their homes, that's happening to a whole lot of people now who are not of Hawaiian decent. And again, current citizens are immune from such action. And on the comment for billing Hawaii for their "defense" in WWII, I suppose you don't know that they were bombed. Not to mention that Pearl Harbor was placed their by us, so I'm sure the Hawaiians would gladly give them their ships and equipment. Especially since the US knew of the bombings and allowed for them to happen so that they could get the American people behind then in entering the war.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • bekah_1984:

      Because leeches on U.S. income should be resisted, as we would exterminate fleas on a dog.

      Hawaiians that entered the U.S. as citizens should be sent back to their home country, if their country decides to separate from the U.S. they should be denied all rights as U.S. citizens. Hawaii was HAPPY to join the U.S. as state! All rights to U.S. protection and support should be denied these ungrateful people. A Hawaiian War Canoe up against a Japanese Battleship would be an interesting comparision. We are in an Industrialized Society, capable of destroying any developing society, they only survive by our compassion.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • bekah_1984
    • 0
      bekah_1984  
    • bekah_1984:

      OK, if a person is born on American soil, they are automatically a citizen. Whether their parents were or not. For example, a woman from Mexico who is not a citizen of the US but gives birth to a child on US soil automatically gives the child US citizenship. That's our law. Currently. Meaning that we do not destroy citizenship. Once you are a citizen you are a citizen of this country forever. We don't deport our own citizens to other countries because WE are their country. Please use some common sense.

      And to say that Hawaii was happy to join the US? Wow... can any country that is forcibly inhabited with foreigners really be happy about what they are told to do? You do realize that America was not the first to land in the Hawaiian islands right? Polynesians, British, Chinese, Koreans, and Spanish have all reached the islands before America did. And only when American missionaries landed on Hawaii did things change significantly (as things usually do when missionaries stick their nose into things). And the Queen of the time surrendered her throne under the protest of her people. Please tell me how you see Hawaii as being happy to join the US.

      And what about the original Virginia? They split into two in the 1860's. So why can we not have change? There is no reason to fear change. It can bring about new ways of living and happiness. And the Federal Government holds us dear because we will do what they ask blindly. We give them money and as long as we keep within our daily routine, they are happy.

      Have you looked into ANY Hawaiian history? Did you not look to see that King Lunalilo did not WANT to let the US place Pearl Harbor on their shores. And when he did, the people were outraged? Or that we were only really nice to Hawaii to get their sugar during the Civil War and then we decided to keep them. The only people who wanted Hawaii to become a state were the businessmen and the people who would rule Hawaii under the new Policy. Those who would benefit from it. Not the people who have lived there all their life. Kinda like how Korea was screwed over. Americans interfere, there's war and unrest, and then the Americans place those who they think will be most beneficial to them (the US) into the highest positions.

      And making hypothetical suggestions about whether Japan would have attacked Hawaii is silly. If they hadn't have allowed Pearl Harbor to be built there in the first place, Japan more and likely wouldn't have attacked since there wouldn't have been a US base there to attack.

      Again, I urge some common sense and a little research before you let others know your opinion.

    • 3 years ago
  • ron_pual_2008
  • lifestudentno83
  • heidilittle
    • 0
      heidilittle  
    • Just goes to show us that people want change.
      They need it. The current systems are failing everyone.
      God bless the people with light and love and the understanding that good change can take time. And that it is each and every person on the planet who is responsible for that change.

      peace love light and unity.
      h

    • 3 years ago
  • ALEGASGUY684
    • 0
      ALEGASGUY684  
    • I'm come from one of the royal chiefly lines of Am.Samoa. I feel like just because our land mass is small in comparison to the U.S. , doesn't mean that we like the Hawaiians shouldn't be respected.Look at Israel All the drama over what they consider to be holy grounds. I'm saddened by the fact that any and all should think that we Polynesians don't feel the same about our own lands.I saw a comment on T.V. where some idiot mentioned all the great things America has done for Hawaii. Does that include wiping out their population, getting Pearl Harbor bombed, and placing a Queen under house arrest. I must say as an American if you don't know your history, pls. keep quiet it's shameful. Especially when the rest of the world knows our historty and geography better than some people (i.e. the person that mentioned all the great things the U.S. has done for Hawaii). Ohh did I also mention the destruction of an 1700 yr. old culture?

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • ALEGASGUY684:

      You should get on knees and beg forgiveness from the parents and relatives of the U.S. boys killed in WWII. If not for their sacrifice, the entire Pacific would be under Japanese domination. You are the one in need of a history lesson.

    • 3 years ago
  • Glaston
    • 0
      Glaston  
    • Give it back... Give all the countries we have stolen back...
      If you have not been to this beautiful country and seen it most distinctive "Non-American Cultural" then you don't really understand that it does not really belong to us...
      Surly America can see the value in freedom... America was built on freedoms... Why do we still not understand we are not free till all people are free?
      Free the poor bloody Hawaiians...

    • 3 years ago
  • AeronPrometheus
  • MoonLoon
  • melberta
    • 0
      melberta  
    • If this the route we are going we should give the rest of the US back to the Native Americans. No matter what is done someone is always going to be pissed off somewhere.

    • 3 years ago
  • Purdey
    • 0
      Purdey  
    • Image
    • Hawaii is one of the poorest US states with a very high cost of healthcare due to aging population, geographic location and climate it also has an extremly low level of educational attainment compared to other states.

      But Hey,,,,,,,What a destination for honeymoons and military bases !!

    • 3 years ago
  • pdubplaw
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • funny, we'll give kosovo it's independence but not our own little occupied territory.

      on the flipside, i've heard hawaiians are bitches to tourists....so f'em.

    • 3 years ago
  • handshakeheartbreak
    • 0
      handshakeheartbreak  
    • To anyone who says "They deserve to, we took their land for commercial gain!" and isn't a Native American is a hypocrite.

      There would be no USA if England didn't want there whacky tabbacy... While manifest destiny doesn't apply to Hawaii, simply seceding for "national identity" is selfish and illogical.

    • 3 years ago
  • PoisonTheMonkey
    • 0
      PoisonTheMonkey  
    • They should be a soveriegn nation, America stole their land and lives from them. They should however, allow all residents of Hawaii to stay there and be citizens of Hawaii.

    • 3 years ago
  • TEC_Photos18
    • 0
      TEC_Photos18  
    • I think that this is a wonderful idea. I am not from Hawaii but do know many natives that feel their way of life has been stripped from them for a tourist destination. Maybe we should leave the islands located almost 2000 miles away from the mainland.

    • 3 years ago
  • grease_weasel
  • Future_America
  • ocanada
  • lat_lat
    • 0
      lat_lat  
    • I was born, raised and currently live in Honolulu, Hawaii. I am not native Hawaiian.

      Hawaii has no Queen. The last ruling monarch Queen Liliuokalani passed in 1917.

      Mahealani Kahau and her group claim to have lineage to last ruling monarch Queen Liliuokalani, however, there are many pro-sovereignty groups in the State who all make the same claims.

      It certainly is a travesty what happened to the Hawaiian people and their culture. However, this situation is not unique to Western civilization. It's an age old story of colonization.

      What this group is out for is money, land and power. The focus should really be on addressing the social and economic problems that are consuming the native Hawaiian people.

      This is where the attention should be. Not on this group and their false claims.

    • 3 years ago
  • CicatrizJCP
    • 0
      CicatrizJCP  
    • What if we dropped Hawaii and took up Puerto Rico. Then Puerto Ricans could take part in the occasional, purely symbolic, participatory act of voting. I wonder if they would vote Republican, Democrat, or, ehh, well those are our only choices.

      Furthermore, we wouldn't have to change the flag - still 50 states.

    • 3 years ago
  • resin_lungs420
  • dankitti
  • Tori
    • 0
      Tori  
    • I was born and raised in Hawaii. It is my "home" and always will be. But, I am not native Hawaiian by blood. Being born in Hawaii does not make you Hawaiian - I am considered "local", but that's not the same as native Hawaiian.

      So if sovereignty movements like this one succeed...I would not be allowed back to my home. The house my parents built themselves and have lived in for 35+ years would, I suppose, be taken from them.

      I agree that it was crappy for the US to overthrow the monarchy. I am also fairly certain that if not the US, some other country would have done the same later on down the road, and better to be part of the US than any other likely candidate. I also know that there are many more Hawaiians who are very very proud to be part of the United States than who hope for the state to secede, and I wish they received as much press as the vocal minority.

    • 3 years ago
  • Argon18
  • KaT_Trina
    • 0
      KaT_Trina  
    • Whether or not I believe that is right or not doesn't make think this is ever going to happen. The US is not going to support this. The most they may do is set up a "Hawaiian Reserve" on part of an island. Look at our track history with the Native Americans. And Hawaii is one of our biggest money makers when it comes to tourism. Sorry. Your stuck in the US...

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • flyingkick, not all monarchies are dictatorships, by any measure. Many monarchs were excellent leaders who cared about their people and worked hard to improve their living conditions. There is absolutely nothing wrong with constitutional monarchies.

    • 3 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • A monarchy ruling Hawaii would be way worse than US sovereignty. At least people can somewhat participate in US government. A monarchy is a dictatorship.

      It'll never happen anyway; why would the US policy makers hand over a $billion economy when they won't even give citizens affordable health care.

    • 3 years ago
  • ctrl_alt_del
  • squidteeth
  • Adumbration
  • blue7272
    • 0
      blue7272  
    • i hope they get what they want. next it should be the native americans. its about time the government pay for all the robbing and stealing they did 2 get what they have

    • 3 years ago
  • NinthVoice
    • 0
      NinthVoice  
    • I believe that though it is the native peoples right to the land, it would not be in the their better interest to separate and alienate themselves from a lot of the income generated by tourism and to disconnect themselves from other benefits offered by the greater USA.

    • 3 years ago
  • shun21
    • 0
      shun21  
    • The islands should belong to the indigenous people, but there is no way in the world that will happen anytime in the near future. The only way they will get there land back is if they take physical action, and I doubt many people will take part in that. Land has always been taken by force and the hands of power are way stronger than a few thousand people who say they want there land back. Most of the people who live in Hawaii and think that the land should be in control of the indigenous probably aren't actually willing to do anything about it. I just hope that whatever the outcome of this situation is works out for the best.

    • 3 years ago
  • renbyrd
    • 0
      renbyrd  
    • I think this movement is important for the message it brings about America's history of manifest destiny. Fifteen years ago, the Native Hawaiians were promised more benefits under a Senate joint resolution, also known as the Apology Bill. But to this day, they have seen little compensation for the illegal overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

      When will the U.S. government stop trying to solve problems and injustices with only words? Where are the ACTIONS to support these admitted wrongs?

    • 3 years ago
  • Adumbration
  • Adumbration
    • +1
      Adumbration  
    • Seeing as the island chain was taken due to corporate interest, I think it's only fair. And we never truly "annexed" them, as some would like you to think.

    • 3 years ago
  • nmsamanda
    • 0
      nmsamanda  
    • The Republic of Lakotah and Hawaiians should get together for strength in numbers. Some Japanese people still think it belongs to them though. I hope I can still visit. What upset me in hawaii were the signs that said "government property". No respect to even say what leg of the "government" State, city, who knows. Wealth is not in dollars, its in fresh air & clean water. They should stick around so the U.S government can pay for all the Californian trash thats about to hit them.

    • 3 years ago
  • Nuevarine
    • 0
      Nuevarine  
    • If Hawaii can pull that off, the rest of America will be in one ugly power struggle for lands that they've 'taken over.' Hell, Puerto Ricans may even be able to vote!

    • 3 years ago
  • clarity_kat
  • big_bad_wolf
    • 0
      big_bad_wolf  
    • i hoe they try to uprise and fight they wont even make it to the big island, and army airforce navy and marine corps base all on one island and they all hate being there, ya see what happens if you try to fight them

    • 3 years ago
  • PoisonTheMonkey
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • Soap
  • clayjj05
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • Argon18
  • parisinla
  • Adumbration
  • J_Jammer
    • -1
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Native Hawaiians make up 1% of the total population. Is she really going on majority rule or her rule? Because if she does get what she wants she could have civil war on her hands by the people that want Hawaii to stay a state that are not part of her 1%.

    • 3 years ago
  • alekseystitchintime
    • +1
      alekseystitchintime  
    • J_Jammer:

      200,000 out of 1,300,000 is not 1%. it's about 15%.

      unfortunately the strategic placement of the islands makes them pretty desirable for any aggressive nation to possess. the EU is a pretty good example of a union of sovereign nations though -- perhaps the US will eventually follow that sort of structure and allow more sovereignty to the lands it's acquired over the years through various nefarious means.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      Native Hawaiians I was talking about. I guess I should have left off followers. Either way she doesn't have the full support of the majority. It would be a mistake to make a move as she wants. Not even the founding fathers were that naive to make a move prior to an unanimous agreement.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • -1
      MoonLoon  
    • J_Jammer:

      It is same old thing! We have peace now, let's ask for Independence. When the Dogs of War, nip at your heels, you beg for protection! This Nation and many others would fall to tyranny, if not for U.S. and European protection! Most Non-Industrialised Nations are helpless before modern warfare. Their leaders are free to decide,Do you want Western Values or do you want Eastern Values? Death of Democracy? You choose!

    • 3 years ago
  • TouchArt
    • 0
      TouchArt  
    • 1,000 Indigenous and Indigenous-minded people united in their right and determination to reclaim governance of their ancestral homeland is very different from 1,000 "followers" on myspace.

    • 3 years ago
  • TouchArt
    • 0
      TouchArt  
    • Another great Indigenous Hawaiian is Po Louis who we met when my husband and Po and her husband were legal aid attorneys for the Dine at DNA People's Legal Services in Navajo Nation together in the mid-1980s.

    • 3 years ago
  • TouchArt
    • +1
      TouchArt  
    • Image
    • The State of Hawaii would be wise to revert governing of the Hawaiian Islands to the indigenous people who know how to live in balance in the ecosystem.

      Could be the best solution to sky-high food prices that threaten the Hawaiian economy.

      _______
      Photo "Hula to Pele" - uploaded by lenezbn.

    • 3 years ago
  • ac
  • MoonLoon
  • Dut
  • clayjj05
  • TouchArt
    • +1
      TouchArt  
    • Good for her.

      The story of how American corporations stole Hawaii from the indigenous people should be more known to Americans.

      Two of my favorite people are Hawaian Indigenous Activists Meilaini Trask, a dedicated attorney, and Luanna Busby, an indigenous activist who learned the ancient art of sacred hula dance from Hawaiian elders.

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • wolfinsheepsclothing
    • +1
      wolfinsheepsclothing  
    • TouchArt:

      i hear all this talk of the US saving hawaii from japan but the fact is, if the americans never moved the pacific fleet here, i doubt the japanese would have had so much interest in hawai'i nei. at least there would have been no need to bomb us. there's no saying they wouldn't have been an occupying force but that would just be trading one controlling force for another, but i digress...

    • 3 years ago
  • SilenceNoMore
    • 0
      SilenceNoMore  
    • Um....i'd give this "direct descendant" more credence if she labled her self the "direct descendant" of the last queen. The last queen ruled after the last king.....soooo any descendant of his really has no claim to the throne....plus i don't think the majority of people living there will go for it. Sure Hawaii makes alot of money, but it is really expensive to make new government and currencey and such, and how many old tourists and other touristy people are going to want to go there when they need a passport and have to get all their money exchanged (more of ours for less of theirs)? And finally, does this mean all the white americans living there would need to leave? that shrinks their population, and their whole country would be one giant resort much like the cities such as cancun and puerto vallarta in mexico where all the white vacationers there look down on them and patronize them. Yea...this is a bad idea

    • 3 years ago
  • pirho338
  • clayjj05
    • -1
      clayjj05 [removed]  
    • SilenceNoMore:

      You have obviously never been to hawaii. Outside the resorts the people are a social services nightmare with high unemployment and alcholol and meth addiction. They wouldnt make it a week without their precious american social services.

    • 3 years ago
  • SilenceNoMore
  • MoonLoon
  • JudahEvan
    • 0
      JudahEvan  
    • Maybe they'll adopt a new currency and it will be cheap as hell to travel to Hawaii. The dollar ain't lookin so hot right now. Hawaii always looks good though.

    • 3 years ago
  • stone246
  • neckfire
more from Community:

top videos