Wal-Mart faces $2 billion in labor law violations
source: http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSN0130762320080702?feedType=RSS&feedName=busi...
-
-
- VynalFrontier
- added this
Another example of Big Business breaking the law. I have a feeling Wal-Mart won[t get away with this one, however, I also have a feeling they won't see a drop in profits as a result of these criminal acts
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Current News US
-
- tags:
- News, News and Politics, Legal, Current Radio News, 5 more
-
-
TexasPatriot67
-
They need to sell rosetta stones language software in walmart where you can speak to the associates in the future
- 3 years ago
-
TexasPatriot67
-
-
LindaBusiness
-
Wow. WalMart is a very real issue. I'll tell you why I won't shop there anymore..it's depressing. I don't care that their prices are so low. I'd rather tend my budget and pay a bit more so that I feel good about where I spend my money.
- 3 years ago
-
LindaBusiness
-
-
subversivelyhere
-
walmart is pretty much an evil corporation. they treat their workers and their customers like dirt, and they get away with it because their prices are so low that many people find it hard to get by without them. local businesses suffer when walmart enters the picture, along with the local economy. it's good that someone is doing something to show that walmart isn't above the law, but i doubt it will have any effect on their profits.
- 3 years ago
-
subversivelyhere
-
-
aquamammal
-
Fuck Walmart.
- 3 years ago
-
aquamammal
-
-
mo1y
-
Being a 4th generation Pittsburgher, I'm aware of Walmarts philosophy concerning wages.
Andrew Carnegie had the same philosophy. Andrew Carnegie held down steel workers wage by stating that he should not have to pay a laborer any more then the going rate for a laborer.
Andrew Carnegie felt that his profits had nothing to do with the amount of money he paid to his workers. Andrew Carnegie did not take into account that steel work in the 19th century was very dangerious.
In the end, Andrew Carnegie gave a large part of his money to charity. The people of the world think of Andrew Carnegie as a great humanitarian, but come to Pittsburgh, and you will not see an Andrew Carnegie statue, or monument.
It is strange the more things change, the more things stay the same.
- 3 years ago
-
mo1y
-
-
hubris_personified
-
In the Regan era, aka the anti-christ, union busting became an official government policy. Does anyone know what the unionizing pioneers had to do to get unions in America? They were brutalized, lynched, thier families killed. Now we're suffering from the errosion of the middle class. We have to take the power back. That's not gonna get done by passive resistance. The first unionizers were killed and killed in return. I've already stated that the founding fathers of our great nation decided that the right to bear arms was a neccessary evil to defend our rights from a government or corporation that tried to exploit the populace.
If the corporate board of wal-mart feared for their lives and the lives of thier families they'd be more amenable allowing unions in thier stores.
Use your rights. - 3 years ago
-
hubris_personified
-
-
mrburns
-
TerryA,
Humm sounds like the real world to me.
At least I know i'll have a job while the rest of you complain
God bless america
God bless big oil - 3 years ago
-
mrburns
-
-
tomofnorthcal
-
It is actually illegal to force someone to work an hourly wage job without pay. 2nd: countries with powerful unions like Scandinavian countries, do not have these issues and still have rich and satisfied workers. Stronger unions would help to fix this problem, but weeding out corporate greed is a harder issue. One solution to corp greed would be re-regulate all large companies to become semi-profits where in they cannot sacrifice employee needs, cannot sacrifice the environment, nor sacrifice the local community for profits. Meaning they don't always have to make a quarterly profit, but can make less without penalties from their board members. Even classical capitalist Adam Smith (I paraphrase) believed that it is ok to make less profit if their is a benefit, plus is OK to give a worker their due pay. In addition, Adam Smith was against monopolies, greed, and we are talking micro as well as macro markets. Thus Walmart is a micro monopoly in many places. Thus, US corporations violate basic capitalist principals again. (src: wiki, adam smith)
- 3 years ago
-
tomofnorthcal
-
-
andreline
-
Are you REALLY surprised?!!
Boycott Wal-Mart
- 3 years ago
-
andreline
-
-
tmaster
-
Wal-Mart (aka Anti-Christ) should be aware that even though it may be big and monolithic in size and apocalyptic in sheer magnitude means you still cant just keep stepping upon the backs of the little people beneath you that serves you and make you strong! Didnt they learn anything from the times of slavery!.......I guess not!
- 3 years ago
-
tmaster
-
-
SKoreaFC
-
This will probably not even affect Wal-mart. I really feel bad for the factory workers in China.
- 3 years ago
-
SKoreaFC
-
-
Greg_Bunker
-
This is the least of our problems.
- 3 years ago
-
Greg_Bunker
-
-
abbo
-
I'm pro capaitalism, but damn walmart's policies seem to echo the "sold my soul to the company store" mentality of feudalism. I'm glad this judge is making the right decision.
- 3 years ago
-
abbo
-
-
Mafioso
-
I try my best not to shop there, but sometimes it's unavoidable. When I do shop there I usually just get the necessities and leave the rest behind.
I used to work at Wal-Mart when I was a youngen, and I can't complain. I used to go and clock in and then leave and get high, throw a munch, and then come back a couple hours before my shift was up. Awww, those were the days. Sometimes, my manager would ask me where I was, and I would retort, "I don't know if you've noticed, but this is a pretty big store". HAHAHA.
I agree though that they've ruined competitive wage and rid the government of a necessity to raise the minimum wage. They argue they pay a competitive wage compared to third world countries and use the fact they can easily hire thousands at one time as leverage to do as they wish to the local economy.
The facts are anytime you make a corporation like thata staple in your local economy it only makes them rich, it doesn't serve your local community at all. Asides from the sales taxes and revenue generated by those means, they rarely reinvest in the local economy because they prefer to have no competition and be the major supplier for the needs of the local residents. The fact they take those profits and use it to boost their own wealth, while cutting costs in everything from production to the items they carry when they need to make up some moolah lost due to low shopper numbers and revenue, proves they have no problem taking the rug out from under the little man to make sure they come out on top.
I have many fond memories of Wal-Mart because I knew how to work their system to my own advantage, however most people don't have the oppurtunity to do that. If I lost my job, it was no big deal. Many of the people that work there have no other real options and have mouths aside from their own to feed. I just needed spending money for my weed, bitches, (this is when I was in the closet) and 40's. HAhaha.
- 3 years ago
-
Mafioso
-
-
Milu82
-
Wal-mart has seemed good to me until I had to see a video at school about Wal-mart. One from a current Wal-Mart employee and another one from an ex-employee, you can see what really goes on in Wal-mart.
Wal-mart always low prices... but someone has to pay for those low prices and that comes at the cost of the employees rights and wages. (Unfortunately)
- 3 years ago
-
Milu82
-
-
Neghie
-
And it'll be striked down by the Supreme court which has shown itself to be pro-big business time and time again.
- 3 years ago
-
Neghie
-
-
Betico
-
and this is why i dont shop at walmart...
- 3 years ago
-
Betico
-
-
onechance
-
Good. Sue the pants off those pricks. SHUT THEM DOWN. They are corporate cancer.
- 3 years ago
-
onechance
-
-
bicyclebasket
-
another reason to drive just a little farther to another store...
- 3 years ago
-
bicyclebasket
-
-
diabolical44
-
wal-mart represents everything that is wrong with America. and it is a symbol of the fall of the American empire.
2 billion dollars is probably an extremely low estimate of how much they've stolen from their workers.
- 3 years ago
-
diabolical44
-
-
Rizoh
-
Eh, that's a drop in the bucket for Wal-Mart.
- 3 years ago
-
Rizoh
-
-
Mark701
-
Realistically they won't have to pay 2 billion in fines. My guess is around 8-10 million max because god forbid the government do ANYTHING that disrupts our titans of retail and industry who are struggling to make billions in profits so they can outsource everything to the Chinese.
- 3 years ago
-
Mark701
-
-
mjsmith11
-
Wal-Mart is crap. The products there are crap. They destroy the Earth by buying goods made in China. Factories in China pollute the Earth and an alarming level. IF we do not stop all of this importing from China we will all earn Wal-Mart wages. Wal-Mart locks in the illegal immigrants they illegally hire inside of there stores overnight. Wal-Mart loses law suit after law suit against them for not paying people to work for them. IT IS TIME TO STAND UP FIRM AGAINST WAL_MART!!!!!!
- 3 years ago
-
mjsmith11
-
-
crob80227
-
When the workers have no power, then management is free to abuse it's employees.
This was the entire reason labor unions formed to begin with!
What was life like BEFORE organized labor and the right to unionize?
That's right kids, the workers got their asses kicked by management because they held all the cards.
This is why Wal-mart (and McDonald's and all other businesses) is so fanatical about keeping unions out -- because once you have a Union then suddenly you can't abuse employees anymore.
"I need you to work another hour off the clock!"
"But I don't want to work for free."
"If you're not a team player we'll just fire you and replace you with someone else."
They've been pulling this shit since the early 1900's!
We're going backward in time!
All the labor advanced we've made are slowly being rolled back.
Wal-mart isn't rolling back prices, their rolling back labor rights!
The BILLION dollar PR campaign by Big Business to demonize labor unions has successfully killed off most of them....and you can watch a corresponding increase in labor abuses.
- 3 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
TerryA
-
I have a very good friend that works for Wal-Mart or (Wally World) as she calls it. She is your typical Wal-Mart employee, a single mom of three, no college degree, and little chance of bettering her economic situation in the immediate future due to the outsourcing of local jobs. She has worked for Wal-Mart for over 11 years and still earns less than $10.00 per hour.
The company works on a military time clock, (24 hour). If she punches in 3 minutes early, or punches out 3 minutes late she is written up, but if her current project (stocking shelves) is not complete at the end of her shift, she is required to punch out and return to finish off the clock. If she punches in or out early or late on 3 separate occasions, she is automatically terminated.
Management in Wal-Mart earn the top wages. The ceiling on hourly wage is $13.00 per hour. Last year, Wal-Mart adopted a new policy of allowing management employment at $13.00 per hour for a time period of no more than 4 years, at which point the employee is automatically terminated or offered a position at a lower wage.
I noticed that some of your responses automatically assume that lower wages are synonymous with under performing stores. Their procedures, I assure you are universal. My friend works at the top performing store in the region. In the last year they have had a 110% turn-over in personnel. All of their management have been replaced with lower paid personnel.
I live in a town of 150,000 people. We are home to 4 Wal-Mart Supercenters. My friends Wal-Mart Nets over $1million per month. Our town was once a thriving manufacturing community, dating back to 1824. During the last 5 years our manufacturing jobs have been exported to Mexico. In 2004 we had an unemployment rate of 8%. Enter Wal-Mart. In the past 4 years we have cut our unemployment rate in half (4% currently) due in a large part to the expansion of Wal-Mart. Unfortunately, our per capita income level has dropped to one of the lowest in the nation, again due in a large part to Wal-Mart.
This law-suit in Minnesota needs to become a nation wide class action suit. Then, and only then will Wal-Mart be brought to their knees. Wal-Mart does not invest in an area, they invade it. With the promise of thousands of "New Jobs" any local government will welcome them with open arms. Once in, they suck the life out of an already shell shocked work force. As my friend says, "Wal-Mart is better than no employment at all."
It's very sad.
- 3 years ago
-
TerryA
-
-
maggs7
-
wal*mart is the devil.
- 3 years ago
-
maggs7
-
-
JanforGore
-
And I believe one of Obama's economic advisors defended Walmart. Seems no matter how many times politicians even tell you they will change things, they won't. Walmart is an evil company and deserves a decent Boycott of their stores. Unfortunately, their ad campaigns as well have brainwashed so many people into thinking they can't buy anything wiithout shopping there because their cheap, smelly, China crap is the only game in town and unfortunately in the current economic climate for many it is. Evil deceptions.
Walmart hss ruined more small communities in this country than can be counted and has now expanded into banking, microlending ( Mexico is where they charge exhorbitant usarious rates for small loans to the poor there) and other ventures. They are not the avearge 5&10 of years ago and they need to be held accountable for their immoral actions. But of course, with politicians of all parties in their pockets that won't happen... so it has to be up to people to break their ties with Walmart and realize there are other places to shop than to support their abuses with their dollars.
BTW, great picture.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Brockie
-
As much as I hate to admit it, when I need a large appliance like an air conditioner or microwave, TV or lawnmower Walmart really is the lowest price around. Sadly I allow my budget to dictate my buying habits. That's the reality for many Americans, and Walmart knows it!
- 3 years ago
-
Brockie
-
-
Hellssatans
-
Their stores smell like tears and desperation plus their employees are like zombies minus the funloving part. Besides if you are willing to work off the clock for fear of losing a Walmart job, how bad is your resume?
- 3 years ago
-
Hellssatans
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
Hellssatans:
What Wal-mart do you go to?
The ones I go to do not have zombies working there. They actually smile. I do see the sad ones but that's rarely and it's quite possible they are just having a bad day. I have those and those kinds of facial expressions when my day is bad but that doesn't mean I dislike my job.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
TerryA
-
Hellssatans:
You evidently never worked for Wal-Mart. They have corporate personnel walk through their stores masquerading as shoppers. They do everything in their power to piss of the employee, if they do, the employee is fired. If an employee does not smile and immediately drop everything they are doing to assist a customer, they are fired. If Wal-Marts $8.00 per hour is the only thing between you and living in a cardboard box, you'd smile like an idiot all the time too.
- 3 years ago
-
TerryA
-
-
ctrl_alt_del
-
But Walmart has 6 pairs of tube sucks for $2.50, how can you say no to that? :(
- 3 years ago
-
ctrl_alt_del
-
-
AdventureBTV
-
Walmart SUCKS! That is outlandish and almost childish to say in that fashion, but really how do you sum up there behavior for the average Joe that has a high school education, lives in a small town, and is nailed in with a wife and kids. They under cut small stores, sell the employees short, and are completely disconnected with anything other than padding their pockets...wait is that a yellow sticker sale....
- 3 years ago
-
AdventureBTV
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
AdventureBTV:
Really if you want to blame something for ruining jobs then blame the border. Maybe you cant' do that, maybe it's easier for you to blame big business. It is always easier to blame the Big guy because most sheep tend to agree just out of habit than actually knowing.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
furryjenn
-
i love the Angry Wal-Mart face
- 3 years ago
-
furryjenn
-
-
Gonz_One
-
Wal-Mart is just wrong!
and the Waltons should be a shamed of themselves.
Don't shop at Wal-Mart, unless you are into supporting global slavery, just to save a few dollars. Dont be a cheapskate! - 3 years ago
-
Gonz_One
-
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
I like to imagine Sam Walton with a monocle and a top hat, laughing to himself as his employees mine coal- er, savings.
- 3 years ago
-
Dmitri_Molotov
-
-
SilenceNoMore
-
Really people. They have been sued how many times? And they always get themselves out of it. Welcome to big corporations.
- 3 years ago
-
SilenceNoMore
-
-
StuArt_Gould
-
this kinda stuff comes from people who dont know crap, i LOVED when i worked for Wal-Mart i found my job fun and enjoyable (i like helping people). I was NEVER mistreated there. When you say something enough times EVERYONE THINKS its true. i remember when i worked for Star Auto Parts they talked about how Wal-Mart was evil, i had to butt in and tell them that they Mistreated me 120 times worse than i EVER did at Wal-Mart. Is that to say the people at THIS Wal-Mart were not dicks? No, they sure as hell could have been, just like ever Star Auto Parts is not full of assholes either. (I'm sure, i cant truly say i know)
- 3 years ago
-
StuArt_Gould
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
StuArt_Gould:
I know of this older guy who was upset when he couldn't go to work and be the greeter. He loved greeting people and seeing the same people and welcoming them. He is like a grandfather age.
I think people say the same phrases so many times that they believe it. They have no proof to back their statements but their own repetition in their mind. It's awesome propaganda like and it works. I don't know who it benefits, but it works.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
TerryA
-
StuArt_Gould:
If it was such a damn good job, why aren't you still there? I imagine you left looking for more money. Or you were phased out by management for a minimum wage employee. Congratulations...your now one of over 2.5 million ex-Wal-Mart employees.
- 3 years ago
-
TerryA
-
-
StuArt_Gould
-
StuArt_Gould:
this is to TerryA, i left to move to a new state to go to school ... shut up you dont know shit ... not only that but i got payed $9.50 an hour when minimum wage was ... i think $6.50 so for a right out of high school student i was doing pretty well for myself. my points about SPECIFIC work places verifies my point (not all good and not all bad)
- 3 years ago
-
StuArt_Gould
-
-
Leonidis
-
Wal mart sucks anyways, personally I have already boycotted that place.
- 3 years ago
-
Leonidis
-
-
Blackfoot777 [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Blackfoot777 [removed]
-
-
procrastinatrix
-
Blackfoot777:
Seconded; even before I watched the documentary, I wasn't shopping at no Wal Mart.
- 3 years ago
-
procrastinatrix
-
-
crob80227
-
TheSpyCorner!
Wal-mart is so blatant and hamfisted with their illegal union-busting tactics that I'm stunned some enterprising young person (maybe a Current.com staffer?) hasn't just gotten a job there and tried to organize wearing one of those little spy cameras.
It would be so easy to bust them, wouldn't it?
Just get a job there and start talking to everyone about organizing a union -- and then when the managers start engaging in illegal union busting activities (such as threatening to fire anyone who joins, claiming the company will shut down instantly and fire everyone if they unionize, ect) then they could post the video on YouTube for all to see.
"We've never done anything illegal," claims the Wal-mart manager.
And then you show him the YouTube footage of him holding a staff meeting threatening to fire or deport anyone who dares join the union.
Or maybe they could be more routine and just catch them "asking" employees to work a few hours off the clock because their shorthanded and then "warning" that employees who don't pitch in and help will be fired.
"We've never done anything even remotely...."
And then we show them the secret video footage of him doing exactly that.
With today's technology it seems like it'd be easy to do.
- 3 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
rpyromaniac
-
crob80227:
Im on it.
- 3 years ago
-
rpyromaniac
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
crob80227:
Why don't you do it?
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
huntre
-
Wal-Mart has been fighting unionization for as long as I can remember. Management intimidates or downright bullies employees with threats of massive lay-offs if the idea of a union is mentioned. If a "Rep" tries to organize, the memos start flying about how counter-productive and disruptive a union would be, ultimately suggesting that they are evil incarnate. Better to hire those without the rights and priviledges of proper citizenship as they can't do much of anything to protect themselves against gross managerial misconduct borne of endless greed.
At least now the bosses know that they can't just get away with anything.
- 3 years ago
-
huntre
-
-
96thdayofrage
-
""A Minnesota judge has ruled that Wal-Mart Stores Inc violated state wage and hour laws, requiring employees to work off the clock, and the discount retailer could now face more than $2 billion in possible fines." "
We still call that labor practice SLAVERY! And, slavery is still ILLEGAL in America, no matter which unregulated corporate plantation is practicing this criminal human rights violation. WalMart employees have no healthcare, no child care, are denied family leave, and make barely enough to feed a hamster, let alone a family. Now, they're being forced to work a set number of hours for free? That's OBSCENE!
- 3 years ago
-
96thdayofrage
-
-
crob80227
-
Wal-mart really isn't like a company such as Ford or GM wherein (at least this USED to be true) you went to work for Ford on the assembly line or whatever and make a decent living.
You worked hard.
You created a good product.
You earned a decent living with respectable middle-income wages and benefits.
Wal-mart is NOT like that.
It's low end service level jobs. Being a cashier or a stockboy or a greeter at Wal-mart doesn't pay a middle-income salary nor (and this is subjective) does it actually "produce" anything. At least at Ford you were building a car!
Now here's the other problem: When the big manufacturers all closed down to take advantage of the slave labor, er, "competitive workforce" in Mexico and China -- those towns were financially devestated.
THOUSANDS of workers were thrown into the unemployment pool instantly and they were all competing for a very scarce number of jobs.
But the mortgage is due every month.
The car payment is due every month.
The insurance premium has to be paid every month.
People are working at Wal-mart not because they love working as a cashier or because they love earning $15,000 a year with no benefits.
They're doing it because (often times) they have literally no other choices.
And what happens to a workforce that has absolutely no power whatsoever and is at the total mercy of the company?
Abuses take place.
There needs to be checks and balances in every system -- otherwise abuses of power take place.
You need checks and balances in government and you need them in the work place.
Only unionization provides a check to the absolute power a company, like Wal-mart can wield against it's employees.
Would any of these abuses have occured in a unionized Wal-mart?
- 3 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
owner1
-
I hate a freaking WalMart. In my town they have taken over major acres of precious scenic land to put their stinking store there. We already have 2 WalMarts and they want to build another one. The community raised so much hell they gave up. Friends of mine have been forced to work there because all the small independent businesses have gone down the drain because of walmarts low prices. Others have worked major overtime at the walmart and not gotten paid for it, what the hell is up with that the walmart also made sure they worked just below 40 hours so walmart doesnt have to pay for health insurance for the employees. This just SUCKS TO NO END then they show their freaking commercials saying they want to do right for americans,HA!.I happily spend a few more dollars at any other store than the walmart. I hope the walmart higherups have to pay major fines and have to do right by their employees all over the world. With all the money the freaking walmarts make they should share some with the people who work so hard for them.!!!!!!!
- 3 years ago
-
owner1
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
owner1:
If one is going to question their business practices then one has to question whether or not who you know is actually hard workers.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
Midnight_DevilX
-
Not if they don't know what's going on............
- 3 years ago
-
Midnight_DevilX
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
If they were so bad to their employees then they wouldn't have any.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
mako2424
-
J_Jammer:
That's not entirely true. I mean, they're not cutting off fingers or anything but they definitely do not have the workers' best interests at heart.
It's not about blatantly abusing all of it's employees, it's about mistreating some of its workers in a manner that is less than they're legally entitled to.
- 3 years ago
-
mako2424
-
-
AutifK
-
J_Jammer:
I don’t agree with that comment. First, if a person wants money enough, then that person will disregard how bad a company treats their employees. This is especially bad if a person has no accessible means to any other types of jobs. I think an immigrant or a foreigner would be a good example of the type of person that Wal-mart could take advantage of. As a parallel, not everyone wants to be a prostitute because not all prostitutes get treated respectably, that is, some prostitutes are abused. However, if it is their most feasible means of income and all other jobs are not feasible to come by, then they have to deal with that occasional abuse. You could argue that if they (the immigrants) need money, but find the conditions of Wal-mart abusive, then they should go work somewhere else. The problem with that is that people just arriving into a country don’t necessarily have a lot of money to spend, so time is an issue for them. Since Wal-mart is the most accessible, then they have to jump right on it and yield to abusive treatment. It is abusive treatment because they are not following rules and regulations of how all employees should be treated. Anyway, to be fair, I don’t know what the demographics of Wal-mart employees are, but that’s what I think.
- 3 years ago
-
AutifK
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
And who is one to believe? Someone that hates them or someone that is actually fair in their assessment of what is going on?
I do not trust the people that have only hate to spew.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
AutifK
-
J_Jammer:
I agree that we should not listen to those who are expressing their hatred and there is no substantive basis for which they express their hatred. My next question is whether you have heard both perspectives. It seems like you have heard what the 'haters' have had to say. What do those with the fair assessment of Wal-mart's practices have to say? How closely does it match the reasons for which the 'haters' have for disliking Wal-mart?
- 3 years ago
-
AutifK
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
If there is some truth to the constant complaints by those that never worked there then Wal-mart has some issues to work out. What place of business doesn't? Whether or not what they have done is on purpose just to cut the bottom line or they have legit reasons for being the way they are is something that will always be questioned.
I understand that business has some nasty habits and that it should be watched carefully no matter who is running the show, but at the same time if they are not doing anything that is out of the ordinary for their line then what is the problem? As long as they are doing as they should within the laws granted them I don't see a problem.
If employees have issue with not having unions then there are other jobs that have such and they can go find employment there. It isn't necessary for every business to have unions.
It doesn't work for the Teachers. That union makes it twice as difficult to get rid of a teacher who has done major wrong than actually help keep good teachers around.
It's a double edge sword. Is it really worth having or are people just wanting it to be a business like ever other business, which it isn't.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
RonenA
-
J_Jammer:
Well ya, if they don't break the law its fine. But the accusations here are that they did break the law. And if the court determines it is true they should without doubt be punished. I'm confused what you're trying to justify.
- 3 years ago
-
RonenA
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
I'm confused why y'all are so gun-ho on the court actually being right.
I guess it has to do with them agreeing with your dislike than truth.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
crob80227
-
Wal-mart is just an average company.
HOW they are able to get the prices low is the problem.
It's not like Wal-mart is just a good old boy going to suppliers and hangling out a good deal that benefits everyone.
They are using their very size to "game" the system to the point where you have to sell your goods at Wal-mart or you don't sell them at all....and the "deals" they broker are pretty close to Mafia-loan shark deals.
Hating Wal-mart just because they make money?
That's like saying, "You only hate Al Capone because he's successful and has money!"
And what about your taxes?
Don't you want lower taxes?
See, if you watched "Wal-mart: The High Cost of Living" you'd see the segment where in the Wal-mart HR Dept PROVIDED welfare forms to their employees and gave them all the info necessary to get a welfare check.
Your taxes are being used to subsidize Wal-mart.
They can get away with low prices, because they pay low wages -- which they can get away with because YOU are making up the difference in the form of taxes paid to the Wal-mart employees in the form of welfare!
I've shopped at Wal-mart a few times.
It's a weird feeling knowing that I'm paying them with my taxes.
- 3 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
I think that if the court had ruled in their favor there would be an uproar over that. A court ruling isn't necessarily linked to right and wrong.
Wal-Mart has the great ability in offering the lowest prices without cutting into their employees' pay and the great ability of being in constant lose-lose because people just hate to hate.
Mom and pop places when they do well end up exploding and going nationwide are profiting off of being good. But apparently once that happens people all the sudden hate them because they've succeeded just because they are no longer mom and pop. This reminds me of lame music lovers who hate when their bands sell their music to commercials. OMG they sold out. No they are making money. What do you want them to do dig out of the trash can to get food to make you happy?
People act like they don't do things for money. These are the same people that steal music off the web instead of go to the store and buy the CD.
It's atomically hypocritical and it's sickening.
If Wal-Mart is guilty of what the court says then I hope they fix it.
But I'm not going to stop shopping at Wal-mart just because they lost a court case. Money is important in this life and I am not going to spend more money somewhere else just to please the haters.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
AutifK
-
J_Jammer:
I disagree with your final comment. It's not a matter of not buying stuff from Wal-mart because of the haters. It's a matter of your contributions to Wal-mart to continue their abusive treatment of their employees. Looking from your perspective, it is good that you are happy, but just remember the people who are being mistreated to provide you with that happiness. And remember that it is Wal-mart's customers that help perpetuate that mistreatment and in essence, promote that mistreatment.... Also, to look from another perspective, I'm sure if you were the one being mistreated, that is, you were one of Wal-mart's employees, then you wouldn't want to see that mistreatment continue. To be fair though, I do not know what can be done to end their mistreatment without at the same time losing the source of income (assuming that the source of income they have is the only feasible source of income).
- 3 years ago
-
AutifK
-
-
RudyRudell
-
J_Jammer:
"What do you want them to do dig out of the trash can to get food to make you happy? "
YES I DO.
- 3 years ago
-
RudyRudell
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
This is not like Jamaica where people who disliked the way they were being treated in Britain could protest and it work.
I do not find people's rhetoric about Wal-mart believable. i do not think that Wal-mart is innocent of the accusations. I just don't think they are down right totally guilty either.
It's like Starbucks. People whine about them and they started off small. I think people hating on big business is stupid just because they make lots of money. I don't hate on places because of the amount of success they have. Pointless.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
momus
-
J_Jammer:
That's a false analogy. I have personally worked at a job where I was underpaid because I couldn't find another job at the time. Many people work at Walmart because they need the money badly, even if they are treated poorly.
- 3 years ago
-
momus
-
-
PaintingM
-
J_Jammer:
People hate Wal-mart *because* of their underhanded practices, like the one described in this story. I have no idea how you could even have the gall to say "Wal-Mart has the great ability in offering the lowest prices without cutting into their employees' pay;" this is exactly what the suit was about!
Then your comment about mom-and-pop stores; that has no relevance what-so-ever. Wal-mart was once, long ago, a "small" store but it is no longer even vaguely associated with that notion--people "hate" it not just out of spite but because of the heartless conglomerate it has now become. Everyone wants to see mom-and-pop stores succeed, some are lucky and hit it big, some are lucky just to survive, but more and more are decimated by the big chains, like Wal-Mart.
Your comments are always so pompous are oblivious! It's maddening. - 3 years ago
-
PaintingM
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
J_Jammer:
No they do not want success. They hide behind the idea that someone has done wrong without proof.
A suit is not proof of any wrong doing. Evidence is that. Anyone can bring a suit upon someone. It's the proof that matters.
I've read stories about court cases and proof I am hard to press on what is actually truth and what is just people hating because people with an agenda are horrible because they refuse to see what is actually going on.
So far no proof is offered by any of you other than an article that talks about a suit. Wow. Do you know how many suits are brought against business that are huge and make lots of money? Lots. Why? Because they want a quick buck. It hardly ever has to do with them actually wanting justice.
I don't think you can be truthful and tell me that you dislike them just because they are a big business. And if you can then do tell me what big business passes your standards that they are without fault and you shop there. Then I'll find the flaws in them and ask you how you can over look those flaws.
Go on...what big business do you shop at if you are not a hater.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
kassie422
-
J_Jammer:
I have never shopped at Walmart and never will. I love it when mom and pop make it bigger but to become so greedy that they want to take out all the other mom and pops, then they do not get my loyalty. I knew from the beginning that they treated their employees as low as they could. Various lawsuits through out the years have proven that. I agree that if you keep your employees down; you keep your customers down and Walmart has been able to corner the market with it. No, I will never shop there and things I have received from there weren't that great anyway.
- 3 years ago
-
kassie422
-
-
crob80227
-
There are two ways for a company to meet their budgets, profit goals and quarterly earnings goals.
1) provide an excellent product or service that people want to buy and sell a lot of it.
or
2) Keep cutting wages, force people to work off the clock, eliminate all health benefits, hire illegal aliens that will work for less than minimum wage.
It seems like juuuuust about ALL the major corporations have opted for option #2 as opposed to actually building a better mouse trap or selling more widgets.
You can't run a national economy entirely on credit cards and cutting the company payroll.
At some point (God forbid) companies in America are going to have to increase WAGES in order to increase sales.
Consumers and workers are not seperate and distinct.
The workers at Wal-mart that is losing money is also a consumer that is losing money.
Less income equal less spending. Less spending equals less sales. Less sales equals lower profits.
I think we're entering a new era wherein it's becoming overwhelmingly obvious that you can't maintain this country having 200 million people earning $8/hr with no benefits.
Bring Back The Unions!
- 3 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
crob80227:
Or deport the illegals.
- 3 years ago
-
J_Jammer [removed]
-
-
peenkeefeenger
-
crob80227:
I'm with you
- 3 years ago
-
peenkeefeenger
-
-
clayjj05 [removed]
-
crob80227:
LOL the Union
Ask Detroit how successful the Union was.
Or the Airlines - 3 years ago
-
clayjj05 [removed]
-
-
CreditFigaro
-
crob80227:
great post, crob.
- 3 years ago
-
CreditFigaro
-
-
mookster_07
-
crob80227:
Crob: great point about the distinction between the consumer and the laborer. When the very same class of people employed by wal-mart is the same class of people who shops at wal-mart, you would expect wal-mart to treat them with a little more compassion. At least isn't that what a smart business would do?
Rich people don't shop at wal-mart.
- 3 years ago
-
mookster_07
-
-
squeege
-
crob80227:
This is so right. This is happening all the way across the board. Sadly, it's been happening for so long now that it has really taken a toll on the middle class, and our economy overall, amoungst other problems. Ah-emmmm....BUSH..cough, cough.
- 3 years ago
-
squeege
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
- more
