Community | July 06, 2008 | 56 comments

Gay asylum seeker to be deported despite fear for his life

Image
JanaPokana
Syrian Jojo Jako Yakob, 20, has been refused permission to stay in Scotland and was told he is likely to be safe in his homophobic country of origin if he behaves "discreetly".

Yakob suffered horrific abuse because of his sexual orientation and political activities in Syria. Having been arrested for distributing 'anti-government' leaflets, his treatment worsened once Syrian police officials and prison guards found out that he was homosexual. As a result, he was shot and beaten so badly that he fell into a coma for twenty days.

In 2006, Yakob fled to the UK in a lorry. He attempted to start a new life in Scotland, but last March, the Home Office ordered his deportation. Last week, his appeal against the decision was denied even though the immigration tribunal accepts that Yakob is gay and that Syria criminalises and represses homosexuality.

Even though campaigners and lawyers are convinced that Yakob's life will be in serious danger if he has to return to Syria, the tribunal suggests that he is unlikely to be harmed as long as he keeps his sexuality hidden. The ruling by the Asylum Immigration Tribunal, sitting in Glasgow, states: "Syria criminalises and represses homosexuality. Homosexuals have to modify their behaviour and lifestyle accordingly."

Gay rights campaigners are outraged at the judgment. According to Peter Tatchell, a gay rights activist, "this young man's life will be in danger if he is deported. It's outrageous that our Government is showing such a callous disregard for human rights.

Yakob says he now fears for his life: "I am very afraid of being sent home," he said. "I am afraid for my life. But I will do my best to win my case and stay in Scotland. I want to stay here, but I can't do anything until I am allowed to stay. I can't get a job, I can't do my computer training – my life is on hold."

Yakob's lawyers are currently planning a last court bid to stop his deportation.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Sex and Love,   4 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Current News UK 14 more
  3.     
    |

56 comments // Gay asylum seeker to be deported despite fear for his life

  • balderdashandpiffle
    • 0
      balderdashandpiffle  
    • Under International law in order to claim asylum the seeker has to apply for asylum in the first safe country that they reach.

      Despite the merits of the case I do not believe that Scotland was the first safe country he came to - there must have been a number of other countries he could have sought asylum in before he reached Scotland.

      Because the claimant is Homosexual refusal of his claim will generate a great deal of publicity. Deporting this individual will send a message to future 'would be' asylum seekers not to bother coming to Britain because the nation is not a soft touch. Go somewhere else. (However I am surprised that an earlier tribunal did not grant his application).

      Now that the point has been made - he cannot (Or should not) be sent back to Syria which is an unsafe country for him. So what is to be done? Perhaps he can be deported to another EU jurisdiction e.g. France, Ireland or England where he can put in a fresh application for asylum.

      In the final analysis the asylum rules need to be clarified and more codified to eliminate such anomalies.

    • 3 years ago
  • Brockie
    • 0
      Brockie  
    • Sending him back to Syria is just crazy. And telling him to just act straight when he goes back, and he'll be fine is deadly advice. It was the police and the prison guards that outed him. Now the fact that he's gay is on all his files and records. And the article sure didn't help keep it a secret from the Syrian police and authorities. We can only hope that some other country offers him asylum. Or he'll be dead 10 minutes after stepping back onto Syrian soil.

    • 3 years ago
  • LindseyIndigo
  • markyboi
    • 0
      markyboi  
    • This sickens me to be scottish, how someone can tell him to "be discreet" about his sexuality shows how much these people don't know. You want him to live alone all his life?

    • 3 years ago
  • brainopops
    • 0
      brainopops  
    • Image
    • This is similar to the case of Mehdi Kazemi.... he recently won the right to stay in the UK after his boyfriend was executed in Iran for being homosexual.

      Check out the video from the guy that helped bring him back.

    • 3 years ago
  • Satyagrahi
    • 0
      Satyagrahi  
    • It's terrible that these people would rather send him where he will be punished for who he is, insisting that he should just hide his true identity, then let him live in their country. What is the reason? How is this justified?

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Oh my god Scotland are you serious? How heartless is it tell a gay man to be a little more discreet before you deport him back to Syria? That’s like telling a 1930-ish Jewish guy to “pull off that Yamika and act a little less Jewish,” right before you deport him back to Nazi Germany.

    • 3 years ago
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • advertise his sexuality? when did he advertise it? it was found out against his will.

      you did advertise your sexuality. you're straight!

      there is a word for being scared of straight people, heterophobic.

      no one is claiming gays or lesbians to be angels but is that a good enough reason to have him killed?

      a trouble maker? he handed out pamphlets. he was just practicing free speech. did you read the article? and he won't be put in jail, he'll be killed. killed for speaking out and for being gay. you're ok with that?

    • 3 years ago
  • mo1y
    • 0
      mo1y  
    • Everyone in this world has choices. This man from Syria made very bad choices.
      I am straight, but I do not advertise it. I do not wear an ear ring in one of my ears to single that I'm straight. I consider my sexuality a private matter.
      I do not understand, why people have to advertise their sexuality. Most gay men do not advertise their sexuality, because it's none of any ones business.
      I also think the term "homophobic" is discrimatory, because their is no term for a gay man who is afaird of straight men.
      I had a straight friend who was a hairdress. He was treated badly by gay hairdress, because he was straight.
      So gays are not these innocent humanbeing devoid of prejudges.
      If you have to show your sexuality, then be prepared for problems. This man was a trouble maker in Syria, and would be a trouble maker in Scotland. Deporting him is a way for Scotland to save money, rather then keeping him in jail like Syria wants to do.

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
    • 0
      uroborus8  
    • mo1y:

      "I also think the term "homophobic" is discrimatory, because their is no term for a gay man who is afaird of straight men."

      It is called heterophobia and I have it when I read posts like yours.

      I am terrified of people that do not get it. Being gay is not a threat to humanity. This boy does not deserve a death sentance because he is who he is, or god for bid he told someone who he is.

      I do not know you, sir, but I doubt anyone questions your orientation. Some gay guys and lesbians exhibit traits that are impossible to hide from everyone else. I'm sure you've met people that exemplify this.

      No one should ever be asked to hide who they are to make bigots more comfortable.

      Asylum should be granted to this boy and any gay or lesbian whose life is threatened in theocracies like Syria.

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
    • 0
      uroborus8  
    • Some, for what ever reason, doubt that Syria has the death penalty for gays and lesbians. The ILGA tracks international laws that affect LGBT people. You can view their color coded map at the link. As you can see, Syria is coded with the death penalty. Syria is one of 9 countries that still execute people based on sexual orientation.

      Here is the link the current story:
      http://current.com/items/88901137_map_of_gay_rights

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
    • 0
      uroborus8  
    • Image
    • The Asylum & Immigration decision is unacceptable. They are giving this kid a death sentence, especially now that he is internationally famous for his homosexuality.

      Please write the decision makers at the link I provided to politely express your outrage.

    • 3 years ago
  • dadapapa
  • mjsmith11
    • 0
      mjsmith11  
    • craigers, Do you have any facts to back up your hateful claim? Your example of Iran is not even applicable because Iran is not an Arab country. Your statement seems to come from ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

    • 3 years ago
  • rwylie
  • uroborus8
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • I find it funny people care how a country acts when it has to do with homosexuality. They don't care before. They don't care that a tyrant is running a country and ruining people's lives....until it has to do with homosexuals and OMG this is a human rights issue.

      If they are doing anything else wrong people don't care. Leave them alone...that's their country. Iraq. Iran. any middle East country....until it's homosexual related.

      I hope Venezuela starts doing something to Homosexuals so that people will notice how bad it's there and how fake the news is when it comes out about how the government treats people. They turn a blind eye until someone of a different sexual orientation is involved.

      I think Scotland is making a vital and horrific error in judgment here. I like when governments pretend to follow rules when they don't tend to do that in most situations prior to the one that makes the headlines.

      Deport those that cause trouble.
      Deport those that are bad for the economy or bad for humans in general. Send them back to their country to ruin that country.

      But when the person is of no threat in such a manner why deport them according to rules? Because you want to prove you actually have the ability to follow your own rules when you are being watched? stupid.

    • 3 years ago
  • junsumoney
    • 0
      junsumoney  
    • J_Jammer:

      It is weird how when a homosexual is involved, LGBT communities and sympathetic people are aware of the problem. Especially the title of this article, "Gay asylum seeker...". No hate on the gays, by the way.

    • 3 years ago
  • craigers
    • 0
      craigers  
    • We all know extreme Arab regimes penchant for harming gay people (see Iran's executions). Scotland sending this man back is nothing short of a human rights violation. Scotland should be held accountable if they end up sending this man to his probable death.

    • 3 years ago
  • mjsmith11
    • 0
      mjsmith11  
    • Why does the media a;ways bad mouth Arab countries. always hear the worst lies being told about every Arab speaking country. This story is just another sad example.

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
  • dadapapa
  • unclepete
    • 0
      unclepete  
    • With this kind of (lack of) mentality, the GLBT community should forget Scotland as a travel destination. Why spend money in a place that would send a person back to death.

    • 3 years ago
  • iOw
  • diode
    • 0
      diode  
    • hey, come on over, whats america for right? come degenerate our society a little more, its so bad we won't even notice these days!

    • 3 years ago
  • edbr
    • 0
      edbr  
    • diode:

      are you saying that being gay would degenerate society here?

      i think you're very misguided, diode. your daddy teach you to talk like that?

      take a look around you. homosexuality is becoming more and more accepted in the developed world as people begin to realize it is a natural thing.

    • 3 years ago
  • rwylie
  • diode
    • 0
      diode  
    • diode:

      something becoming more accepted doesn't make it right

      and yes, i know he's in the UK but wheres the next place he'll probably go? america...

    • 3 years ago
  • craigers
  • diode
    • 0
      diode  
    • diode:

      because i don't agree with you i'm the close minded one. if it becomes popular to jump off bridges and i refuse, i become the bigot. who has the irrational line of thought my friend. whats popular is not a valid justification for anything. humans are sheep, dim witted and easily manipulated. i am not to be one of them.

    • 3 years ago
  • diode
  • edbr
    • 0
      edbr  
    • diode:

      diode, you talk about the sheeple, etc, and YOU'RE the one following the herd! do you not realize that the anti-gay conservative is and has been the majority for many years?

      what is happening is, with the growth of technology and the access to free media, bloggers, etc, people are learning to think for themselves, thus the recent liberal movement.

      so go jump off a bridge, since all the other conservatives are.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • diode:

      Just because you don't agree with someone's lifestyle doesn't mean you hate them.

      Unless you're stating that you not liking someone's life style is you wishing them to die for what they are? Because I'm sure you, edbr, have those you dislike. Who is it you wish to die because of your dislike of them?

      If no one then why do you presume such is the case with others just because the person and/or group they don't agree with are gay?

      Gay shouldn't = special treatment or treated with OMG they can do no wrong.

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • diode:

      jj: special treatment? i didn't know life was a special treatment. his name is known. if he goes back he'll be put to death.

      but i guess with your logic they're not killing him, just the homosexuality, right?

    • 3 years ago
  • menmykoko
  • ipodrulz
  • rwylie
    • 0
      rwylie  
    • pos_nir: could you just clarify whether by "rome" you mean Syria or the UK?

      By "do as the Roman's do", you must mean that you either want him to repress his natural sexuality, or that you agree with his lifestyle. Which is it?

    • 3 years ago
  • thejohnnyg
    • 0
      thejohnnyg  
    • Many countries, including the United States, are very biased in their acceptance of refugees. This doesn't pertain only to sexuality but also to a refugee's country of origin. The United States is notorious for accepting refugees from countries that are considered to be enemies of the United States especially if they are communist countries; take, for example, Cuba. On the other hand, refugees from countries that are considered far more oppressive but with "democratic" governments supported by the United States (for example, the Duvalier regime in Haiti) are far more likely to be turned away when seeking refugee status. The bottom line is that accepting or denying a person's petition for refugee status is typically not based on the validity of their claims of an endangered existence in their country of origin.

    • 3 years ago
  • rwylie
  • dadapapa
    • 0
      dadapapa  
    • I agree with rwylie. Isn't it a human right to be able to express yourself and to live an open life without shame and secrecy? Plus, given his record with the Syrian police, I am sure he will be targeted if he has to return and they will make his life a living hell ...

    • 3 years ago
  • dchild000
  • rwylie
    • 0
      rwylie  
    • Even if the tribunal is right, and he could be safe in Syria by repressing his sexuality, is it fair that we should essentially condemn this man to a life of secrecy, and probably misery, by deporting him to a country which does not recognise as we do his right to live the way he wants to?

    • 3 years ago
  • dadapapa
  • dadapapa
    • 0
      dadapapa  
    • Yeah, this sucks! You would never tell someone seeking asylum for another reason to just go home and behave 'discreetly'! I cannot believe it ... hopefully, the final appeal is successful!

    • 3 years ago
  • bishopobispo
  • pos_nir
  • dadapapa
  • pos_nir
  • rwylie
  • iOw
  • craigers
  • rickm8
    • 0
      rickm8  
    • pos_nir:

      amen. its not america, hes gotta deal with it. it isss unnatural, immoral, and a complete slap in the face to the laws of evolution as they are and will be (homosexuality that is). but i mean hey were america its cool to be a complete evolutionary failure. he must cover it up or yeah, his fears will come true.

    • 3 years ago
  • dadapapa
  • rickm8
    • 0
      rickm8  
    • pos_nir:

      Oh, sir, I completely and full heartedly apologize for my grammatical errors in the posting of mine previous to which you currently read! or grow up and respond based on something other than the downfalls in proper written english. like actual substance. an online forum is not the place to deem it nessicary to uphold the rules of writing per sey. it wasn't a backward opinion either sir, it was a SCIENTIFIC FACT! i mean if you wanna deny science congrats your sub-human.

    • 3 years ago
  • KevRunnes
    • 0
      KevRunnes  
    • pos_nir:

      Listen mates, not EVERYONE on this godforsaken planet is in The United States, Rickm8; we need to get that set out right here. Not everyone in this world has experienced the freedoms that americans do, so we've got to be more understanding.

      Now, while pos_nir's comment was quite blunt and not all-so tactful, I must agree with him on a certain level. If in Syria, Jojo Yakob - for his own safety - must repress the fact that he is homosexual in daily conversation. Brutal crimes are commited against homosexuals in many countries, EVEN the U.S., so he must be careful about who he shares his sexual orientation with. I do not agree with Scotland's shameful behaviour on this matter, but it is happening all the same.

      It is simply depressing the things that happen these days.

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:

top videos