Community | July 30, 2008 | 14 comments

Sex-determination testing for female athletes at Beijing Olympic Games

Image
JanaPokana
A special laboratory is being built in Beijing; this one is not for drug testing, but will allow officials to determine the sex of athletes taking place in this year's Olympic Games.

According to Professor Tian Qinjie, "suspected athletes will be evaluated from their external appearances by experts and undergo blood tests to examine their sex hormones, genes and chromosomes for sex determination." The tests will not be conducted on every female athlete, but will be required if doubts have been raised about the sex of a competitor. "The aim is to protect fairness at the games while also protecting the rights of people with abnormal sexual development," Qinjie says.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) introduced sex testing in 1968 at the Olympic games in Mexico City, after the masculine appearance of some 'female' competitors had started to raise questions about the sex of athletes in female events.

Sex-determination tests were seen as degrading, with female competitors having to submit to humiliating and invasive physical examinations by a series of doctors. Later, the IOC decided to use a supposedly more sophisticated genetic test, based on chromosomes. Women usually have two X chromosomes; men an X and a Y chromosome. So, only those athletes with two X chromosomes could be classed as women. However, many geneticists criticised the tests, saying that sex is not as simple as X and Y chromosomes and is not always simple to ascertain.

It is thought that around one in 1,000 babies are born with an "intersex" condition, the general term for people with chromosomal abnormalities. It may be physically obvious from birth - babies may have ambiguous reproductive organs, for instance - or it may remain unknown to people all their lives. At the Atlanta games in 1996, eight female athletes failed sex tests but were all cleared on appeal; seven were found to have an "intersex" condition. As a result, by the time of the Sydney games in 2000, the IOC had abolished universal sex testing but, as will happen in Beijing, some women still had to prove they really were women.

Transsexuals, who have had a sex change from male to female, on the other hand, can compete in women's events in the Olympics, as long two years have passed since their operation.

One of the most tragic rcent cases is that of Santhi Soundarajan, a 27-year-old Indian athlete. Soundarajan had to endure public humiliation after she lost her silver medal for the 800m at the Asian games in 2006. Soundarajan had lived her entire life as a woman, but failed a gender test and it is suspected that she has a condition called Androgen insensitivity syndrome, where a person looks like a female, but has the genetic make-up of a man. The embarrassment and humiliation combined with the prospect of having to end her career had a strong impact on Soundarajan who survived a suicide attempt according to Indian newspapers.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Green Earth and Science 6 more
  3.     
    |

14 comments // Sex-determination testing for female athletes at Beijing Olympic Games

  • arcticspirit
  • rightbrain
    • 0
      rightbrain  
    • I don't see how testing for this is a privacy violation issue necessarily. To simply confirm through testing, what would normally be plainly evident is just a matter of being overly bureaucratic.
      Now if we're talking about excessive needle poking, we have something to complain about!

    • 3 years ago
  • polkey1
  • rightbrain
  • purplefox
    • 0
      purplefox  
    • Wow, tricky call by the IOC I guess, since they both want to ensure fairness and be sympathetic to genetic abnormalities and syndromes, though it sounds like they weren't exactly sensitive in the case mentioned..

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Wow. I guess there is a difference between a man and a woman. Enough to make people fuss over who is where and why.

      Most people would rather there be no difference. Can't wait for us to have the ability to change from penis to vagina and back again.

    • 3 years ago
  • saverio
    • 0
      saverio  
    • Image
    • Sex determination tests may constitute privacy violation but in these cases are absolutely necessary. The IOC can't let men compete in women's events. It wouldn't be fair towards other athletes and the countries they represent.

    • 3 years ago
  • EclecticBadger
    • 0
      EclecticBadger  
    • saverio:

      Whilst playing devils advocate here...

      How would the IOC catagorise a hermaphrodite?

      (a) by physical appearance
      (b) by the atheletes chosen associated gender, or
      (c) by chromosonal definition

      And speaking of fairness of competitiors against other countries - could a country of origins topological and metrological factors considered an unfair advantage? Does living at high altitude - with associated increase lung efficiency - make it unfair on competitors living a sea-level; or would living in a tropical region give better advantage over those unable to cope with the heat of the track?

    • 3 years ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • saverio:

      The Olympics are all about people who have a natural advantage in athletics. It's a competition to determine who the best human is in a particular event. Some countries excel in certain areas, some don't.

      The reason they separate the sexes is because women wouldn't really have much of a chance otherwise in most areas.

    • 3 years ago
  • malathion
    • 0
      malathion  
    • huh ? what would approaching an athlete and questioning their sexuality sound like ? it's hard to imagine any athlete deliberately competing as another gender for a competitive edge and risk the kind of nightmare fallout they and their country would have to deal with if exposed .

    • 3 years ago
  • EclecticBadger
  • emmahill
    • 0
      emmahill  
    • I'm gobsmacked! Are people really that deceitful, they'd compete in the womens' event, if they are in fact, men?

      Do we not trust anyone anymore?

    • 3 years ago
  • JanaPokana
    • 0
      JanaPokana  
    • emmahill:

      I think in most cases, the female athletes were not aware of the fact that they were genetically male as they had been raised as women and never had any reason to doubt the sex they were assigned at birth. In this sense, it has nothing to do with deception.

    • 3 years ago
  • abbym0308
    • 0
      abbym0308  
    • My god. As if having a condition like Androgen insensitivity syndrome isn't enough to deal with, some bureaucratic committee gets decide whether you are enough of a woman as to not disadvantage others. I appreciate that medical technology has come so far and can be used for so much good, but just because we have the capability to do these test doesn't mean that they are always necessary.

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos