Community | August 06, 2008 | 16 comments

War on terror is smokescreen for PNAC

regjoeschmo
This is just part one of the speech, go to youtube to see part 2
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   WTF,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics WTF 26 more
  3.     
    |

16 comments // War on terror is smokescreen for PNAC // Video

  • Hawkmang
    • 0
      Hawkmang  
    • Image
    • @ fauxsherrr, I agree. We should not support our government's commitment to imperialism. And while disbanding the Republicrats is highly unlikely, we can all continue to campaign for third party candidates and get the messages out there that challenge the status quo.

    • 3 years ago
  • EclecticBadger
    • 0
      EclecticBadger  
    • Despite political propaganda in an attempt to convince otherwise, war is no longer about defence, it is about pre-emptive resource acquisition and global weapons trade.

      Theatres should be about entertainment not about unleashing the super power killing machine.

    • 3 years ago
  • fauxsherrrr
    • 0
      fauxsherrrr  
    • Seeking to start a global conquest will ultimately be the downfall of western civilization. We need to do away with the republican and democratic parties.

    • 3 years ago
  • Relevations
    • 0
      Relevations  
    • huntre......another good name for you would be.....findre.....you always bring something good to the conversation....glad you are here......Golden Ruler......Johnnie Hargrave........

    • 3 years ago
  • huntre
  • huntre
    • 0
      huntre  
    • Image
    • As the PNAC's website has been "suspended", here's another one that gives some idea of what this "think-tank" is (or was) about.

    • 3 years ago
  • Relevations
  • themanwithadog
    • 0
      themanwithadog  
    • NPAC`s stated goal is to promote American global leadership.

      For leadership read "domination"

      NPAC also protects the backs of those who started the movement

      Motto "You watch my back and I will watch yours"

    • 3 years ago
  • Kynmore
  • Relevations
    • 0
      Relevations  
    • War...has always been a way to rape....pillage.....plunder......from the first to the last....the economy of the United States has been so closely tied to war....we started with a war...we will end with a war...such a pity......and many feel that the great technology we experience today is a result of past wars......can you imagine where we would be if we were not in this yo-yo mentality.....going from space men to cave men........over and over.....and we had listened instead of killing in fear........Golden Ruler......Johnnie Hargrave.........

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • I want to hear more about these Phases of this war....he merely mentioned it but never returned to it. What are the phases?---well he did go more into it but not enough detail not enough assurance.

      Alleged Terrorist activity is what is freaky...yes....as well as the thought of it being a conquest.

      But fabricated? No. I don't by fabricated. It has to be all the way false or he won't be believable. Extremes are important because if they are wrong about the threat of terrorism being zeroed out then he can't be as OMGish as he wants to be and needs to be.

      I believe his line in thought on making Osama capable of nukes was something that allowed them to treat this in a different and more aggressive manner.

      The label of what the nukes is a bit scary....that is also something that sounds true. Very true.

      He NEEDS to learn to speak better....I just don't get why people who are in jobs in public speaking that they speak so poorly.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • J_Jammer:

      His job is not public speaking, though, and he obviously is not really used to it outside of the framework of teaching university students. At least he put his message across. As for terrorism, many terrorist attacks are false-flag attacks - just google Operation Gladio, for example, or Operation Northwoods or Northwoods Project.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      His lack of ability was getting on my nerves. If one wants to be heard and understood it is best to present the information as it is important as you think it is. Not like it was something you threw together that morning.

      If he can't deliver it with the importance it's to have then how should he believed by those he is trying to convince and not those that were clapping so hard?

      It's easy to speak to those that agree because you can sound like crap and all they hear is the theme.

      But to those that don't you are actually speaking to and they are who you should be pleasing more so because they won't believe you just because.

      When someone is fidgety, their eyes darting about, and stuttering as they are telling you something you're more likely to believe they are lying to you or hiding something. It is important to believe your thoughts so others can understand them. Not everyone is willing to overlook the presentation to hear the actual message and the majority of those that don't are those that are most likely not going to agree just because---but could be convinced otherwise by great speaking.

      I listen to what is being said more so than the poor delivery. But I have done several speeches and have been in classes for such for most of my life so it bugs me more so than it bugs others when someone does a hack job.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • regjoeschmo
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Here is part two.

      If you are registered with YouTube, you can create playlists in which videos automatically follow each other. A playlist can consist of only two videos. :)

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos