Community | August 12, 2008 | 35 comments

U.S. troops still in Georgia

Image
Vierotchka


U.S. personnel responsible for training members of the Georgian military remain stationed inside the volatile country, where fighting erupted Friday between Russia and Georgia over the breakaway province of South Ossetia.

The U.S. European Command said on Monday that there were no plans at this time to withdraw the U.S. military trainers from the country. There are still 127 U.S. trainers in Georgia, where the American forces had been preparing the Georgian army for operations in Iraq.

Meanwhile, U.S. civilians started to make their way out of the country over the weekend, according to the U.S. Embassy in Tbilisi.

Convoys carrying family members of diplomats, government workers and ordinary citizens bound for the embassy in neighboring Armenia continued on Monday.

Tom Mittnacht, a spokesman at the U.S. Embassy in Armenia, said the office was not releasing the number of evacuees it has received so far. But the numbers do not seem to be exceptionally large.

"We’re working on a few convoys," Mittnacht said.

Upon arrival in Armenia, families are taking up residence in hotels while they wait things out.

"We’re here to provide them with any assistance we can," Mittnacht said.

Regarding the military personnel, EUCOM stated that they are not engaged in the conflict and are removed from where the fighting is happening.

In addition to the trainers, 1,000 soldiers from the Vicenza, Italy-based Southern European Task Force (Airborne) and the Kaiserslautern-based 21st Theater Sustainment Command, along with Marine reservists with the 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines out of Ohio, and the state of Georgia’s Army National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 121st Infantry recently participated in "Immediate Response 2008."

That exercise, which had the U.S. troops operating from Vaziani, concluded on Thursday. That base, near the capital of Tbilisi, was bombed by Russian aircraft over the weekend, Georgian officials said.

As for the roughly 2,000 Georgians currently deployed to Iraq, they are now being redeployed to their home country for support. The first of those soldiers departed Iraq over the weekend, according to the military.

The Georgians had made up the third-largest contingent of foreign troops in Iraq.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Random
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Random 6 more
  3.     
    |

35 comments // U.S. troops still in Georgia

  • saveplanetearth
    • 0
      saveplanetearth  
    • WE ALL NEED TO REALIZE THAT GEORGIA COMMITTED GENOCIDE AGAINST SOUTH OSSETIA, AND RUSSIA IS JUST DOING WHAT WE DID FOR KUWAIT, EXCEPT RUSSIA HAS MORE REASON, CONSIDERING THEY HAVE RUSSIAN PEOPLE MAKING A LARGE PART OF SOUTH OSSETIA POPULATION!

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • mwfBuck
    • 0
      mwfBuck  
    • With troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, the American military is strained. If we do, however, decide to get in the middle of this, World War III is imminent.

    • 3 years ago
  • mjsmith11
    • 0
      mjsmith11  
    • We must stop this horrible Russian aggression now. When Nazi Germany went invaded it neighboring countries, the world made the wrong choice by doing nothing. We, the free World, can not afford to throw our hands up in the air and say our hands are tied. This attack and invasion of our democratic ally Georgia, needs a quick and forceful response. Appeasement to Russian aggression is the absolute worst course of action. History proves this.

    • 3 years ago
  • SwiftlyTilt
    • 0
      SwiftlyTilt  
    • mjsmith11:

      Its funny, because you're right on the one hand that Russia's invasion into South Ossetia, and keeping a military force there, resembles when the Nazis took the Sudentenland in Czechoslovakia, and the rest of the world said, "Alright you can have it, but no more..."

      However, if the US did go to war with Russia over Georgia, and somehow, NATO was activated to fight with us, that would also resemble when WW1 was started because a series of defensive pacts were activated over a small country called Serbia.

      I don't think going to war for Georgia is the right idea at the moment, especially since Russia did not attack Georgia "proper" at all, and South Ossetia has been calling for independence for almost 20 years now.

      What I think is the right solution, is that NATO gets together, and seriously discuss how they are coordinated together. At the same time, i believe the EU and the US should also have joint discussion diplomatically, and with Russia, and explain to them that there is no place in the world today for this bullying.... then again, the EU & US are not so much angels themselves... sigh...

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • mjsmith11
    • 0
      mjsmith11  
    • mjsmith11:

      Vierotchka - You are just plain wrong.
      SwiftlyTilt - Russia did attack Georgia. When the United States was attacked, our Allies came to our assistance. We need to help our Allies the same way they came to help us.

    • 3 years ago
  • SwiftlyTilt
    • 0
      SwiftlyTilt  
    • mjsmith11:

      Actually Vierotchka is right, Georgia did attack first.

      South Ossetia has been basically "autonomous" since 1921. Its only since 1989, have parties in South Ossetia started challenging this position.

      Since the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia, Georgia & South Ossetia have had a joint "peace" keeping force. However, Russia has been playing favorites with the Ossetes, underming Georgia's hope of a peaceful resolution to the conflict. It was Georgia who attacked first against separatists groups, in order to bring a military end to the situation. Russia only attacked places in South Ossetia.

      I think Russia is just trying to stir up trouble, and Georgia is trying to maintain the sovereignty its held for the last 100 years.

      What I don't think, and I think is ridiculous, is the suggestions that this conflict is caused by the U.S. due to some militarisitic & imperialist ambitions.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • SwiftlyTilt
    • 0
      SwiftlyTilt  
    • mjsmith11:

      Yes, everything is the US fault, and Mother Russia is the defender of all oppressed peoples everywhere.

      Give me a break Vierotchka, you blatant bias against the US prevents you from offering anything useful to this debate...

    • 3 years ago
  • virggie
    • 0
      virggie  
    • Millerke, you're right, there the UK still has thousands of troops in iraq and Poland has 900 (which they will withdraw by the end of the year) But germany has none.

      About the american's involvement: They can deny their troops are fighting all they want, but they don't have much credibility in my opinion.

    • 3 years ago
  • millerke
    • 0
      millerke  
    • Also, to virggie, the georgians only have 2000 troops in Iraq, from a country of over 5 million, that's not unreasonable. A lot of larger European nations have refused to send troops. That statistic, the third largest contingent, should be checked. I'm pretty sure Britian, Germany and Poland all have more than 2000 troops in Iraq

    • 3 years ago
  • joshuaheller
  • Vierotchka
  • virggie
    • 0
      virggie  
    • Poor Georgia.

      The US owns them and there's nothing they can do about it. They sold their souls and their people will pay for it.

      It looks like Russia will hold to their end of the cease fire, but with America pretty much controlling Georgia, I won't be surprised if hell breaks loose again.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mihrab
    • 0
      Mihrab  
    • virggie:

      a simple 'screw the US' would've sufficed.
      why does everybody think the US is a Proctologist? We don't have our hand up everyone's asses and perform ventriloquism.

    • 3 years ago
  • virggie
    • 0
      virggie  
    • virggie:

      Yet look at Georgia.

      If you think that the US has no control over the current situation you are mistaken. If Georgia ever dares disagree with the US there would be consequences. After all, they've even got troops there already..

      Also, such a small country as Georgia and yet so many troops in Iraq?

    • 3 years ago
  • millerke
    • 0
      millerke  
    • virggie:

      The Russians have not upheld their end of the cease fire, and have even let loose paramilitary troops who have been rampaging through the countryside. They want nothing more than to control Georgia and the pipelines that run through it... and there's nothing wrong with the US having troops in Georgia to help train their armies. I think it's pretty clear that none of the US troops have been fighting in Georgia, otherwise there wouldn't have been such a complete crushing of the Georgian military Sunday night.

    • 3 years ago
  • SwiftlyTilt
    • 0
      SwiftlyTilt  
    • virggie:

      Virggie, you have no idea what the h*ll you are talking about. The US' role in this is minor. What this has to do with is Russia feeling threatened by the outside world, like it always has since the Napoleonic Wars.

      Separatist Groups in South Ossetia have been calling for independence since 1989, and when the USSR disbanded, Georgia asked Russia to form a peace keeping force to prevent all out war.

      This worked fine for awhile, but during the next decade, Russia began to feel threatened that the West was meddling in its affairs, with the admission of several former Soviet Republics into NATO. The Russian government issued Russian passports and military aid to South Ossetians to raise favorable support in that region.

      Russian even got more upset after the official talks between NATO and Georgia, over Georgia's application for formal membership in NATO. It was turned down, because basically the EU doesn't think Russia is bluffing when it says, "Stay out of our affairs..."

      What happened this year was Georgia attacking South Ossetia, because years of Russian support for the separatists is seriously undermining its sovereignty. Russia retaliated, and ruthlessly, to show Georgia who's the boss in the region.

      Georgia is an ally of ours (i.e., the US), and its a real shame after the support they have given us in Iraq, we will not do the same. But at the same time, do you really want the US to get into a pissing contest with the other country that has the most Nuclear weapons?

      And what if Georgia was a member of NATO. Remember it was a series of defensive pacts and a small country called Serbia that World War 1 was started over...

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • virggie:

      SwiftlyTilt - South Ossetia was originally part of Ossetia. It was split in two in the 1930s and the southern part attached to Georgia for two reasons - Stalin (who was a pure Georgian from Gori) hated the Ossetes, and for a logistic reason. South Ossetia was never part of Georgia before that, it has nothing in common with Georgia, whether it be ethnicity, language, customs, traditions. Georgians have been ostracizing the Ossetes from South Ossetia for many decades, raping, killing, pillaging etc., the Ossetes.

      Georgia is an "ally" in the neocon ambitions to rule and dominate the world and to destroy Russia so as to take Russia's immense untapped natural resources as well as its huge reserves of natural gas and oil. Saakashvili is a Bush whore.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mihrab
    • 0
      Mihrab  
    • virggie:

      At least i can safely say this is the first successful invasion Russia has ever conducted. Throughout history Russia has had a terrible track record in invading other countries, (ex Korea, Iraq) so score 1 for Russia! lol isn't war so much fun when you're not affected by it!?

    • 3 years ago
  • SwiftlyTilt
    • 0
      SwiftlyTilt  
    • virggie:

      Yes, Georgia has been raping South Ossetia for decades, so that they can fufill the dreams of their Western imperialist masters around the world, and rape Russia for all its natural resources...

      Seriously?, Seriously?

      I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here people...

      In 1801, North & South Osseita, along with Georgia, where taken into the Russian Empire. When Russia fell apart during WWI, Georgia took South Ossetia. When the Soviet Union came out of the ashes of the old Russian Empire, they told Georgia to keep South Ossetia, but to make it an autonomous district (oblast). This arrangment worked until 1989.

      This is a matter of Russia & Georgia feeling that their soverignty is being challenged. Although I don't agree with Georgia, forcing the South Ossetes to be part of their country, I think its kind of d!ck that Russia is handing out passports and military aid, in order to make the situation worst.

      Can people please stop blaming the US for every little problem that goes on this planet, and realize that other governments can be corrupt bullies as well. I think the sooner we admit that we are all liable to f*** up, and not just one country, the closer we can get to solving our problems...

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • millerke
    • 0
      millerke  
    • virggie:

      Actually, there never was an Ossetia...the Ossetians are a type of people who were displaced out of Russia in the middle ages and setteled into areas in Georgia. After the collapse of the Soviet Union the Ossetians have been trying to gain independence from Georgia unsuccessfully, although Georgia has offered them multiple ways to become a state within the Georigan country and they have refused. For more information, check out wikipedia, which has several credible sources cited.

    • 3 years ago
  • malathion
  • stanman48
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • I hope the US can mobilize and get enough contractors so Georgia can better protect itself, get better trained and learn from this to become a much stronger ally.

    • 3 years ago
  • mjsmith11
  • Vierotchka
  • extblues
    • 0
      extblues  
    • Considering that Georgia is a strategic location for the US (...for a variety of reasons), and depending on how well the cease fire holds over the next few days (...cross your fingers people, although personally I'm not all that optimistic considering the players involved), it is unlikely that our troops will completely withdraw from the region anytime soon.

      That said, I think the S&S article is underestimating troop strengths by about 15 - 20%. "Redeploying" two-thousand Georgian troops, and all their stuff (...vehicles, weapons, and other assorted toys), from point "A" to point "B" implies pilots, load crews, and other support personnel to make such a mission run smoothly. Call it between one-hundred to one-hundred and fifty from the active Air Force or Air Force Reserves.

      And, let us not forget those who aren't there on an "official" basis. Numbers here could, realistically, be between two and two hundred depending on your personal levels of cynicism and paranoia.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • extblues:

      It is strategic inasmuch as it is needed by the USA for the USA's attempts at world domination and the USA's desire to destroy Russia. No decent human being could conceivably support such an agenda.

    • 3 years ago
  • Chuck_st_chuck
  • mjsmith11
  • Vierotchka
more from Community:

top videos