Community | August 31, 2008 | 26 comments

Railroads: A nineteenth century technology that can save 21st century resources

Image
love_is_my_religion
Over the past few months, the gas crisis has inspired an endless parade of suggestions for reducing America's dependence on foreign oil. From opening offshore drilling to distilling ethanol to fast-tracking a fuel-cell car program, there has been no lack of plans for cutting oil imports. Ironically, while these impressive, innovative solutions have crowded the news, relatively little attention has been paid to one of America's most energy efficient forms of shipping and transportation: railways.

Every day, tons of goods are moved across the United States. Most of this shipping is done by truck, resulting in the consumption of millions of gallons of fuel and the release of thousands of tons of exhaust. While container shipping and America's vast network of highways make trucking the simplest form of shipping, it is also among the most expensive.

One solution to this problem would be the increased use of rail shipping. According to the Association of American Railroads, U.S. railroads use, on average, only one gallon of fuel to move a ton of freight over 436 miles. This represents an 85% increase in efficiency since 1980, and is, according to AAR President Edward R. Hamberger, "three or four times more fuel efficient than trucks." Other sources claim that the difference is even more dramatic; Treehugger, for example, states that trucks can move a ton of freight only 59 miles on a gallon of gas, which would make railroads seven times more fuel efficient than trucks. Regardless, Hamberger goes on to note that "if just 10% of the freight currently moving by truck went instead by rail, the nation could save one billion gallons of fuel by year."

With that in mind, it seems mind-boggling that the vast majority of the United States' goods aren't moved by rail. According to Ted Michon, a noted rail consultant,"the class one railroads - and there are five of them - are currently working at or over capacity." Any expansion of operations will require a significant investment in locomotives, rail yards, and track. In the case of locomotives, this means placing orders several months ahead of time, in the hopes that the demand for increased rail service will remain consistent. Similarly, laying track and building rail yards also requires considerable advance planning. Unfortunately, fluctuations in the price of oil could alter consumer demand, undermining the cost-effectiveness of rail shipping.

Ultimately, the biggest roadblock to more widespread rail usage is America's lack of a long-term transportation policy. Unfortunately, as Michon notes, "Every major change in transportation policy has been caused by a crisis." This certainly is true of major expenditures in highways and airports; presumably, it will also be played out in the matter of rail infrastructure. While there isn't much that the average citizen can do to increase rail usage, it's worth paying attention to the rhetoric being employed by the major parties as we get closer to the next Presidential election. When political candidates speak out against rail infrastructure, they are, effectively, endorsing a more expensive and wasteful transportation policy!


by Bruce Watson
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News Politics Green Earth and Science 13 more
  3.     
    |

26 comments // Railroads: A nineteenth century technology that can save 21st century resources

  • tracyetheridge
    • 0
      tracyetheridge  
    • I am a trucker and the trucking industry has made changes in the fuel,the way the engines run on low sulfer fuels, some-states are putting a limit on idle-times, and with the high price of fuel no one can afford to idle anymore but the railroad hasn't had any kind of new regs on the locomotive engines in decades

    • 3 years ago
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • i wish we americans could travel around the states the way that europeans can get around on their rails. i've always been jealous of that. i'm glad that obama acknowledged in his acceptance speech that we should invest more into amtrak. i think that's going to be very important going forward. years and years ago america invested heavily in superhighways (like I-95 on the east coast for example) and at the same time europe was investing in railways. i think they made the better decision

    • 3 years ago
  • fiat_lux088
    • 0
      fiat_lux088  
    • I always viewed the locomotive as a coal exhaling monstrosity I was unaware of its efficiency. Then again where I live there are no trains, just its tracks.

    • 3 years ago
  • dreamsenvoy
    • 0
      dreamsenvoy  
    • i like that idea! thank generations of the ol'boy scroticular network 4pre- programming the masses to pay the rockerfellers and bushs b4 the actual logical solution is implemented. Evolve Mutate Wakeup

    • 3 years ago
  • brittanyday
    • 0
      brittanyday  
    • I love traveling by train! More Americans should embrace it. I don't own a car anymore because there are so many alternatives where I live. I also commute home from College by train!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • Symbolic
    • 0
      Symbolic  
    • Good post! Traveling by train is something we need to invest into more. I wouldn't mind my tax dollars go towards a beneficial, as well as beautiful way of traveling. We need trains more than ever. Screw planes! I'm not in a rush, nor do I care for the hassles of customs.

      I hope they go through with the proposed bullet train in California.

    • 3 years ago
  • justright
  • MarshallsCarousel
    • 0
      MarshallsCarousel  
    • I use the train all the time. We need to invest in it once again. I think we lost the appreciation for the lands' vistas when we started stopping at gas pumps instead of unknown towns.

    • 3 years ago
  • NeoDotCom
    • 0
      NeoDotCom  
    • Did you know that funding for rails and public transportation ended so that we could build expressways and airports.

      Food for thought

      noneofthisisnew.com

    • 3 years ago
  • insanejain
    • 0
      insanejain  
    • I definitely agree with this post, and also i second the point made by others that there should be more railways for public transportation.

      Like in Europe they have high speed trains which transport people all over the continent, whereas here in our country even with the presence of trains we seem to have no alternatives other than using Cars or Airplanes for transportation.

      I guess its all about advertisements mostly, or the governments just busy looking for CLEANER fuel (which is not bad at all) when they could significantly help the country's economy by proposing new sets of transportation ideas for citizens of U.S.

    • 3 years ago
  • ipodrulz
    • 0
      ipodrulz  
    • I always thought the train was a good idea. Because it can move shit loads of people really far really fast, and in an environmentally friendly way.

      Give the trains electric motors, and generate the electricity from solar panels or/and windmills!

    • 3 years ago
  • Humdrum
    • 0
      Humdrum  
    • I've been saying this to people for about a year now (don't know what it's been doing exactly, but meh). Long distance, overland travel, whether freight or private citizenry, belongs on the tracks.

    • 3 years ago
  • NaCl
    • 0
      NaCl  
    • I think the government fears starting up using rrailroads again because when it started as a large booming industry monopolies were present...

    • 3 years ago
  • clayjj05
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • A few facts from the American Truckers Association

      The trucking industry consumed 53.9 billion
      gallons of diesel fuel and gasoline in 2006.
      Based on consumption and price, ATA reported
      that motor carriers spent a record $112.6 billion
      on diesel fuel in 2007. The industry will break
      that record in 2008 and will likely spend more
      than $125 billion on diesel.

      There are 3 million large trucks on the road in
      the United States and 5.3 million commercial
      trailers registered in 2006

      There are 3.5 million truck drivers in the United
      States Total industry employment is 8.7 million,
      or one of every 15 people working in the United
      States

      more info at the link....

    • 3 years ago
  • Hiway
    • 0
      Hiway  
    • The railroad industry has been quietly pointing this out for over a decade. The logic is sound, the benefits are as easy to predict as queenofit so eloquently posted already.

      I would guess that due to the plain fact that it would alleviate oil usage is exactly why it has been kept quiet- the oil lobbyists where getting more attention than the RR lobbyists- imagine that with the administration we have had over the last 8 years.

    • 3 years ago
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • I'd love to see more passenger trains where I live. Unfortunately, trams only run in the city and come nowhere near the suburbs, where I honestly think they're needed more.

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • I don't know much about this, but I have wondered why we don't use Railroads for more of our hauling.

      Reading the story it says: "Hamberger goes on to note that "if just 10% of the freight currently moving by truck went instead by rail, the nation could save one billion gallons of fuel by year."

      That seems like it would be worth looking into, until one looks at the huge economy that the Trucking Industry has become. Then one thinks of "lobbyist" and then other unknown connections. I have wondered if that may be the real reasons why we haven't done this??

      There are so many positives to using RR; for example, the traffic on the interstate highways would be reduced immeasurable, the roads would not be so damaged by heavy trucks, and it just seems safer. Gotta be more to this.....

      Someone who knows more than I do, may be able to enlighten me?

    • 3 years ago
  • vandrunv
  • clayjj05
  • aspenlve
    • 0
      aspenlve  
    • Railroads changed the country in the 19th century, now they could help change it again in the 21st century. Great post, thanks.

    • 3 years ago
  • love_is_my_religion
  • gentjim
  • love_is_my_religion
more from Community:

top videos