Community | September 28, 2008 | 126 comments

Intruder dies, intending sexual assault

Image
cantucwearebrothers
INDIANAPOLIS -- A man who police said broke into a home with the intention of sexually assault a 17-year-old girl in her bedroom died early Sunday morning after a struggle with the girl's father.

David Meyers (pictured), 52, was pronounced dead at the scene shortly after officers arrived following a report of a home invasion in the 3500 block of West 79th Street at about 3:20 a.m.

Officers said they found Robert McNally, 64, on the floor with his arm around the neck of Meyers, struggling to hold him down.

When officers told McNally he could let go, they found that Meyers was unresponsive. Medics who were called to the scene then pronounced Meyers dead.

Indianapolis police Sgt. Matt Mount said Meyers had come into the home naked, except for a mask and latex gloves.

"He had rope, had a knife, had condoms, had a gag," Mount said.

Police said Meyers had gotten into the home through a window next to the girl's bedroom and that he knew the home well because his uncle owns it and he was an acquaintance of the family.

The teen awoke to find a naked man in her room and began screaming, alerting McNally, police said.

During a protracted struggle in the hallway of the home, McNally was able to get his arm around Meyers' neck and subdue him while his wife called police, officers said.

Meyers was a registered sex offender and was released from prison two years ago after he had served 10 years of a 20-year sentence for criminal confinement and sexual deviate conduct stemming from a case in Hamilton County.

Meyers was also being sought in Boone County for failure to register as a sex offender.

Police said Meyers had been living with his mother down a gravel road from the home that the McNally family lived in and had recently lost his job.

"When they got the mask off, both the father and daughter recognized him," Mount said.

Police said Meyers had a history of heart problems. They were not immediately sure if he died as a result of heart failure or from being choked.

The results of the police investigation will be turned over to the Marion County Prosecutor's Office, but it is unlikely charges will be filed, police said.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Crime,   Current News US
  2. tags:
    News Crime Current News US Justice 3 more
  3.     
    |

126 comments // Intruder dies, intending sexual assault

  • magnusdeus
  • HolyCity2012
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • Better than putting the guy in jail where he would get out and do it again.... again........criminal confinement and sexual deviate conduct!!!! He should have never been let out in the first place... prolly shoulda just killed him for the first charge. I dunno Im biased I have a daughter myself..........

    • 3 years ago
  • Liberal_Extinction
    • 0
      Liberal_Extinction  
    • Yep, thankfully another piece of shit has been removed from the gene pool without a long drawn out ACLU defense of his "sickness" that he can't help. Good riddance to bad rubbish. Thank goodness the girl and her family weren't hurt.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • Liberal_Extinction:

      hey jerk, maybe you noticed that all the "liberals" on this site agree that the father was freaking awesome. rather than bringing partisanship into this, or the amazing aclu, why not just be quiet.

      shhh, sh sh shhhh,

      quiet

    • 3 years ago
  • JudahEvan
    • 0
      JudahEvan  
    • Liberal_Extinction:

      What an excellent way to shit out your pathetic drivel. The ACLU has nothing to do with this (at least at this point). And nobody here, or at least not me, thinks we should not be allowed to bear arms. You are way out of scope. Your attempt to act compassionately falls on deaf ears here LIberalExtinction. You are the most violent person who posts on Current and consequently I don't give a fuck how you feel.

      More than any person on this site, I despise you LiberalExtinction. When you are ready to fight for what you believe is 'your' country, I will be right in front of you ready to fucking rip your head off for what I know is my country. You would kill me for my beliefs, as you say time and time again on this open site. I for one will not meet your violence with pacifism. I will fight, for tolerance and decency are on my side. Hatred and prejudice are on yours.

      So every time you think about killing some Liberal faggot because they are destroying 'your' country, you better hope that you don't come for me.

    • 3 years ago
  • HolyCity2012
  • Liberal_Extinction
  • Everestmagic
    • 0
      Everestmagic  
    • Liberal_Extinction:

      Exactly correct, Thank-God the father and daughter were not hurt, but for a long draged out trial, sorry to say your wrong. The Defense will either use insanity or excessive force on this idiot's defenses. Until this country takes self defense like Texas does, this country will continue to make lawyers rich no matter the charge. "BET ON IT"

    • 2 years ago
  • joshuaheller
  • fight2smoke
    • 0
      fight2smoke  
    • This is why I own a protective trained American Pit Bull and a 12 guage. If charges were filed on the father i am willing to pay for his lawyer.

    • 3 years ago
  • iloveravi
  • kennymotown
  • A_H_Jones
  • aspenlve
  • jcmoisan
  • matsie
    • 0
      matsie  
    • aspenlve:

      Whether he was killed with a gun or not, the OP's comment is still valid.

      One of the reasons we have the right to bear arms is to protect our homes from outside invaders. Whether they be the British or some rapist.

    • 3 years ago
  • rwylie
    • 0
      rwylie  
    • aspenlve:

      No it's not the reason, the reason is something outdated to do with militias, which are no longer in existence. There is really no reason to bear arms, more people are killed than are saved by them.

    • 3 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • aspenlve:

      Less than .02% of all people carrying a conceal and carry liscense get their guns taken away..... Having guns doesnt mean people will use them for bad purposes. Not only that but crime rates are significantly lower in areas where guns are allowed in homes. Any time guns are restricted a law abiding citizen becomes just another victim to a criminal with an illegal gun. The debate has been gone through in our courts and we do have the right to defend ourselves and our homes by possessing a gun.

    • 3 years ago
  • jcmoisan
  • zealotohio
    • 0
      zealotohio  
    • aspenlve:

      no its not. if the guy coulda blasted the intruder then he wouldn't have had to have his family in danger while the police were on their way.

      defending yourself is a right, and anyone else out there can have a gun.

      if the intruder had a gun he could've shot and killed the girl and her whole family. dad wouldn't have been able to help w/o one.

    • 3 years ago
  • TKerger96
    • 0
      TKerger96  
    • aspenlve:

      i am with you on this.

      unfortunately i think that if the man would have shot the intruder he would have gone to jail.

      but if this jack-off stalked out the home and knew that there was a gun in the household he would have picked another house.

    • 3 years ago
  • Eat_Disco
    • 0
      Eat_Disco  
    • aspenlve:

      if the man had shot the intruder it would have been pre-meditated murder and he would have gone to jail. even if it was self defense.
      Besides the right to bare arms might put a gun in the assailants hands too, even un-licensed, fire arms are stolen from private residences every day.

    • 3 years ago
  • Hendrix_Is_God
    • 0
      Hendrix_Is_God  
    • aspenlve:

      I live in London, guns are illegal, the chances of getting shot in London are very, very low. (Though 28 people under the age of 25 have already been stabbed in london this year)
      And it is true, what ever the statistics, more people are killed by guns then are saved by guns.

    • 3 years ago
  • meetslyfox
  • torybart
    • 0
      torybart  
    • aspenlve:

      I agree this is a valid story to bring up the right to bear arms. It's not outdated at all. The purpose was to be able to defend yourself against your own government with a local militia.

      Unfortunately the meaning was lost a long time ago, but the right to defend yourself is still very valid.

      Second, if he had shot the intruder by Indiana state law, where this occurred, he would not have gone to jail.
      "Sec. 2. (a) A person is justified in using reasonable force against another person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person:
      (1) is justified in using deadly force; and
      (2) does not have a duty to retreat;
      if the person reasonably believes that that force is necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony. No person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary."

    • 3 years ago
  • redvelvet1278
    • 0
      redvelvet1278  
    • aspenlve:

      um... no offense and not intending to sound juanile but- that is retarded.

      the guy handled defending his home just fine without use of a gun- and if he had had a gun it could have ended horribly- he could have accidentally shot his daughter in a scuffle with the intruder- these are things that MUST be considered.

    • 3 years ago
  • HolyCity2012
  • brittjoy
    • 0
      brittjoy  
    • aspenlve:

      This sicko wasn't killed with a gun, jcmoisan, but I am a 5'2" girl that lives alone. I'm not going to be able to wrestle an intruder and strangle him dead. The only way I sleep at night is knowing I've got an equalizer.

    • 3 years ago
  • HolyCity2012
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • aspenlve:

      This is why are society is in so much trouble one clown takes the heroic story of a man protecting his family with his BARE HANDS and turns it into a ridiculous arcane conversation about why some insecure wimps have to have their guns.

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
  • frommyhome
  • eldamon
101 - 134 of 134
more from Community:

top videos