Open air gay sex allowed?

John

"There was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved." 13:23-25

"The disciple standing by, whom he loved" 19:26

"The disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper" 21:20
Acts (None)

Romans

With his usual intolerance, Paul condemns homosexuals (including lesbians). This is the only clear reference to lesbians in the Bible. 1:26-28

Homosexuals (those "without natural affection") and their supporters (those "that have pleasure in them") are "worthy of death." 1:31-32
1 Corinthians

Paul lists ten things that will keep you out of heaven, including homosexuality and being "effeminate." 6:9-10
2 Corinthians (None)

Galatians (None)

Ephesians (None)

Philippians (None)

Colossians (None)

1 Thessalonians (None)

2 Thessalonians (None)

1 Timothy

Homosexuals (those "that defile themselves with mankind") are included on the list of lawless, disobedient, unholy, and profane people. 1:10
2 Timothy

Iin the last days people will become evil, "without natural affection." Fundamentalist say that this refers to homosexuals. 3:3
Titus (None)

Philemon (None)

Hebrews (None)

James (None)

1 Peter (None)

2 Peter (None)

1 John (None)

2 John (None)

3 John (None)

Jude

God sent "eternal fire" on the people of Sodom and Gomorrah for "going after strange flesh." 7-8
Revelation

"The hundred and forty and four thousand ... which were not defiled with women"
Are the 144,000 men that are "not defiled by women" homosexuals? Are only gay men to be saved? 14:1-4

"Dogs [homosexuals?], sorcerers, whoremongers, idolaters" and along with anyone who ever told a lie will not enter the heavenly city. 22:15

i think there should be certain places where it is OK to be nude and even have sex outside (hetero or homo it shouldn't matter) and everybody should know where these places are so they can avoid them if they don't want to see it
or so they could go there if they do

maybe they should put a sign up that says "warning sexual actions ahead continue at your own risk"

LMAO! Just like some people in the world to gravitate towards the sounds of moaning with your child?!?...instead of going in another direction. High five for vouyerism and exhibitionism!

Fucking gross and out of line.

In the future she should just carry a high-powered BB gun with her and take matters into her own hands if necessary.

Well, if the cops aren't going to do anything, then capping them in the ass with a BB seems like a reasonable alternative. It's not like they could run after her with their pants around their ankles.

As I said, fucking gross and out of line.

BTW...I would recommend the same solution even if it were a problem with straight couples repeatedly having sex in a public setting.

That's what bedrooms, houses, or at least private property is for people, take that sh*t where it belongs.

This is the fault of the poster for putting 'Open air gay sex allowed'. The fact Gay Sex has been mentioned as a sore point is why people are going nuts. I agree it isn't right for anybody of any sexual persuasion to shag in the open, but why should gay men doing it be more shocking than a bunch of hetero doggers doing it?

It's been written by the daily mail, so people are gonna get all defensive of the gay community.

I think whats MORE shocking that the police are doing nothing about it thought. If it's because it's a 'gay' site then thats just reverse discrimination.

Special rights for special people.

Having sex in a public area is retarded. If you want to have sex in the open air then find a place that isn't near a path.

however, that is probably what was thrilling....the idea of getting caught. I want to see someone have sex I have the internet that will lead me right to that. I don't need to be eye raped.

Personally I think theres nothing wrong with it... but then again I'm also for a more liberal society where children are taught about sex from a young age to de-mystify it and for it too be taught in a factual and honest way. But unfortunatly due to the opression of our feelings for hundreds of years. most Britians won't agree with me.. Shame.

and honestly I'm 18! I'd be offended if a new report called me a "child" I am by law an adult!

ps. also just noticed that this article is the daily fail... seriously, right wing, conservative, near-nazi propoganda if ever I've read it.

I agree with pokinsmot and diode, but I can also see how a story like this can be taken easily out of context. yes, the police should enforce the law, but if it's an area where something like this happens often, then people should also be warned by police to avoid it if they don't wish to be offended - I don't see anything wrong with the police advising that the mother takes a different route in future in this context.

I have nothing against gay people but please keep your porno shows in the privacy of your homes .

Keep it in your home people. A public place has to take into consideration that you just don't want to see this kind of behavour. If you insite of being outsid, go well out the way, not a popular landmark like a park.

What about the English couple that were caught having sex on the beach in Dubia? They were arrested, put on trial, found guilty, and then put in jail! Gay or straight, we all should be accountable to the law of the land! It is up the police to inforce the law equally!

She shouldn't have to change her route, that's ridiculous! It's hard to know if the police would have reacted in the same way if the couple had been straight.

after further consideration, i think i see why the police aren't eager to get involved...

The first time they get caught, give them a warning. The 2nd time, arrest them.

i just can't bring myself to care. we really do live in a prudish society when you think about it. yeah, it's a bit gross and offensive to my cultural values, but so is any sort of public display of affection. doesn't mean i think they should be discouraged by police coercion. not only are we a culture of prudes, but a culture of tattletales.

It's simply illegal to have sex in public. It's an injustice to allow a couple to be given immunity simply because they happen to be gay.

The justification of saving the couple from potential embarrassment simply does not stand; If they didn't want their activities to be made public, they should not have committed them in public.

It sounds like the cops just don't want to do their job. What a surprise.

Enough with the homophobia. I dont condone the actions these two men engaged in, however, these actions are not just "gay" acts. Heterosexuals engage in public sex also. Public indecency is public indecency. Why is okay and cool for straight guys to join the "mile high club"? How many straight men pick up prostitutes and engage in sexual acts in public? Society sets up double standards based on heteronormative sexual behavior. Public sex is a problem for both heterosexuals and homosexuals and it needs to be addressed.

Yeah, take a different route, wow, that lady had some unlucky eyes in her case. That had to be awkward for her if she complained about it.

'If people are concerned for their own safety, we would recommend that they take a less isolated route, particularly if alone.' What? I think she was offended, not scared. I mean really how fast can 2 gay men run with their pants around their ankles!

how is anyone defending this? honestly...

The child was 18- old enough to get a tattoo and drink in England- I doubt that she needed to be protected! and if her mom was an advocate for gays then it should be obvious to her where she was walking!

They either need to be clear and post signs that open air sex is allowed in the park; or they need to enforce public decency and make the fellas get a room.

Imagine your morning stroll. All you want to do is to enjoy the rising sun's glow on your skin. When you find a couple enjoying the sun too much with their birthdays suits in full view having hot sex.

I would be offended especially if my kids were with me.'
Even more if it were gay men.

But there is something wrong with that. There are certain things that are not meant to be done in public and sex, of any orientation, is precisely one of those. At the very least they're breaking an indecent exposure law.

I do not see what the problem is. Yes it is disturbing, but if that area is known for gay outdoor sex, change your route!!! There is nothing wrong with that.

heterosexuals can't do it, why the hell would homosexuals be allowed to do it. it's called public nudity/indecency, causing a public disturbance, etc etc. get a room or get a better spot where people don't walk their dogs. morons.

"But Mr Cunningham, who is also a spokesman on homosexual issues for the Association of Chief Police Officers, argues that offenders should only be prosecuted as a last resort because of the potential impact on their lives of making their activities public."

thats just stupid... if you dont wanna be found out, DONT DO IT IN PUBLIC! gay or straight, the park isnt yours... have some consideration for other people... if a straight couple can get busted for doing this, then the same should happen to a gay couple... you wanna have sex outdoors? go camping way out in the bush...

i wouldnt want my kids seeing this, regardless of the sexual orientation of the act...