Community | December 13, 2008 | 20 comments

The Field: Round one of Obama's "open for questions" reveals clamor for drug policy reform

Image
pokesmot
President-elect Obama - fulfilling multiple campaign promises to more deeply involve the public in setting priorities for his administration - opened up his Change.Gov website to questions from citizens, and asked the people to then rate the questions up or down.

The first round of questions closed at midnight last night, and it should come as no surprise that many of the top questions involve issues that millions of Americans care deeply about but for which commercial media coverage doesn't do justice in reporting or prioritizing.

The number one question for the first round was:go to link
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   WTF,   Random
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics WTF Random 6 more
  3.     
    |

20 comments // The Field: Round one of Obama's "open for questions" reveals clamor for drug policy reform

  • juicie
    • 0
      juicie  
    • Its not just pot, people who seek illicit substances are going to get them, nothing will stop that. Should these purchases go on in a completely uncontrolled market, allowing Mexico's drug czar to make $ 0.5 mil per month from some cartel, and the incentive for a 5,000+ death toll this year to continue...or should we radically change this strategy that achieves nothing positive, and create a market similar to alcohol and tobacco?

      This War on Drugs is the clearest Fat to cut out of the budget as far as I'm concerned...and we've got to start somewhere... might as well be the safest recreational drug we know. Marijuana accounts for over half of all drug arrests... and there are more drug arrests than for violent crime. Where are the victims? Why are we wasting time and money?

    • 3 years ago
  • darkhorsejim
    • 0
      darkhorsejim  
    • Legalizing marijuana is a no brainer - just go for it already - like we have in Mass. Next, hemp cultivation needs to be examined for it's thousands of uses provided by each crop while benefiting the environment. Either medicinally or functionally, ganja has been grown for millennia by a variety of civilizations. Why must we always wait for advancements that can’t be monopolized, end up far cheaper to the consumer & should be more easily accessible by the masses? This once great country needs to get its priorities straight.

    • 3 years ago
  • pjacobs51
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • I’m sorry but I still have not heard a convincing argument as to why America should not be embarrassed right now.

      Knotwurk I agree with you. Smoking marijuana is a victimless crime. Do you know what else is a victimless crime; how about living in Afghanistan, Pakistan, or soon to be Iran? Don’t you think we’d get a lot more bang for our buck if we sent a clear message to the president to stop this endless war on terror? Sure smoking pot is just swell, then again I personally get a nice buzz when I know my country is not bombing innocent civilians.

      How about we repeal FISA and the patriot act? Last time I checked talking on a cell phone or surfing the internet was a victimless crime too.

      Call me crazy but I think if Americans want legal pot they should do what everyone does, get your initiative on a ballet, campaign for it and get it signed into law. Running to the president and begging for him to wave his magic federal wand is hardly a worthwhile effort. Even if the president did decriminalize pot at the federal level, marijuana would still be illegal in all states.

      Conniepie here’s another real fact for you. The term “drug czar” was coined by Joe Biden. So what does that tell you about Obama’s feelings toward drugs? Oh wait Obama picked Joe Biden because he has a lot of foreign policy experience (expect for that whole Iraq war thing). I’m sure both of those guys will put their heads together and reconsider this whole issue though (just like they did with FISA, the Patriot act, the war on terror, clean coal, the death penalty, the bailout, the stimulus package and the funding of the Iraq war).

      I swear this is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. Obama’s entire campaign revolved around fixing Bush’ screw ups and now America asks for Obama to “give me liberty or give me pot!”

    • 3 years ago
  • kyackr
    • 0
      kyackr  
    • Ricky84:

      i'd absolutely agree that on the first of obama's "open for questions" website . change.gov .. that reform of drug policy.. ending up number one is kind of scary or embarrassing ?

      All the concerns created during the Bush presidency are not really being addressed by Obama .... They are still there.. they will still be there for the president elect Obama's administration to utilize.. We are still one whisker away from having a Police State in the USA. It's as if no one has the concerns anymore? and we can now ponder things like legalizing pot? It would have been much better to have the first outcome of "Open for Questions" be a concern over the erosion of our civil liberties .. or anyone of a dozen more serious concerns.

    • 3 years ago
  • heartshapedbee
    • 0
      heartshapedbee  
    • Ricky84:

      Well I'm sure that they are going to answer numerous questions and I'm sure that all those issues that you brought up are important to American people too. The point is that marijuana affects anyone to may want to smoke it, whereas (from my point of view) few people seem to know or care that they're rights are fading away. In their mind its the tradeoff that they've been persuaded into taking for 'security'--its justified by the government. Anyone who has smoked marijuana knows that the laws are not justified and are cruel and excessive and the condition of the prison system isn't justifiable either.

    • 3 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • Recently an Amsterdam official spoke of how their legalization of drugs has worked in this way, half the per capita of people in jail as compared to the United States leading the world in per capita prison population.
      At a price tag of 50,000 dollars a year per person to keep incarcerated how much more proof do you need to realize the war on drugs is just an unjust business and is costing us dearly in treasure and ruined lives. Who the hell is in charge of our democracy, it's us the people tear down the prisons.

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
  • pokesmot
  • pokesmot
    • 0
      pokesmot  
    • I think being able to do what I want to my self is my right, as is our rights to say what we want. Saying is the first step to doing.

    • 3 years ago
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Ricky84, I want an honest discussion, using "real facts". I want people to know the truth. Distorted facts and fixed facts are not the truth. Ordinary Americans make judegment using fixed facts which have been used in the war on drugs.

      A "Czar" was created to silence the conversation. Drug tests were implemented to stop the conversation. Talk about cannabis/hemp, be labeled a druggie? Nothing else needs to be said! The discussion of cannabis/hemp should not be characterized as druggie conversation. Hemp is not even a drug? I relate "Drug Czar" in America as "silenced in America by an American Czar". It's time for change. Americans who want to discuss a “real” plant should not be labeled! That’s an “Assault on Reason”!

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Yeah I love how people are more interested in legalizing pot rather than restoring civil liberties. Sometimes I truly think we as Americans get what we deserve.

    • 3 years ago
  • knotwurk
    • 0
      knotwurk  
    • Ricky84:

      I think civil rights are very much an issue here though. We're talking about something that is essentially a moral law. It's a victimless crime and none of the government's business as far as I'm concerned. It's the government's job to take care of it's citizens and ensure civil liberties, not tell them how to live their lives.

    • 3 years ago
  • LarzNero
  • pokesmot
  • pokesmot
  • Conniepae
  • pokesmot
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Barack Obama possibly picking a Republican to lead the War on Drugs has really been a disappointment for me. I have not agreed with the title "Drug Czar", since it's introduction into American politics.

      I am old enough to remember history. When I was in school "Czar" was characterized as tyrants, and despots from other countries. America started using the title “Czar” and we now have more people in prison than any other country in the world. Apparently, it still means tyrant and despot, just Americanized.

      “Fixed facts” are used in the War on Drugs. They don’t tell ordinary Americans the facts about cannabis/hemp. Ordinary Americans think marijuana (cannabis) is something new. They don’t know “cannabis/hemp” has history, the facts have been removed from American history. They can remove the facts, but they can’t change history.

      It’s time for change. It’s time to stop hiding history. “Real discussions”, “using real facts”, would lead to “Real Change”.

    • 3 years ago
  • dissimulator
more from Community:

top videos