Using Gay Marriage to demand Polyamory, the Ultimate Subversion of Marriage
source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/938xpsxy.asp?pg=2
-
-
- soleil10
- added this
Promoting polyamory is the ideal way to radically reorder society s view of the family," wrote Ettelbrick, who has since formally signed on as a supporter of gay marriage (and is frequently quoted by the press).
She is now part of a movement that hopes to use gay marriage as an opening to press for state-sanctioned polyamory.
Ettelbrick teaches law at the University of Michigan, New York University, Barnard, and Columbia. She has a lot of company.
Nancy Polikoff is a professor at American University s law school. In 1993, Polikoff published a powerful and radical critique of gay marriage.
A movement for gay marriage, warned Polikoff, would surely promote marriage as a social good, trotting out monogamous couples as spokesmen in a way that would marginalize non-monogamous gays and would fail to challenge the legitimacy of marriage itself. Like Ettelbrick, Polikoff now supports the right of gays to marry.
And like Ettelbrick, Polikoff is part of a movement whose larger goal is to use legal gay marriage to push for state-sanctioned polyamory--the ultimate subversion of marriage itself. Polikoff and Ettelbrick represent what is arguably now the dominant perspective within the discipline of family law.
Cornell University law professor Martha Fineman is another key figure in the field of family law.
In her 1995 book The Neutered Mother, she argued for the abolition of marriage as a legal category.
But it s University of Utah law professor Martha Ertman who stands on the cutting edge of family law. Ertman has offered a legal template for a sweeping relationship contract system modeled on corporate law. (See the Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review, Winter 2001.)
She goes on astutely to imply that the increased openness of homosexual partnerships is slowly collapsing the taboo against polygamy and polyamory. And Ertman is frank about the purpose of her proposed reform--to render the distinction between traditional marriage and polyamory morally neutral.
A sociologist rather than a professor of law, Judith Stacey, the Barbra Streisand Professor in Contemporary Gender Studies at USC, is another key member of this group. Stacey has long championed alternative family forms.
Her current research is on gay families consisting of more than two adults, whose several members consider themselves either married or contractually bound.
In 1996, in the Michigan Law Review, David Chambers, a professor of law at the University of Michigan and another prominent member of this group, explained why radical opponents of marriage ought to support gay marriage.
Rather than reinforcing a two-person definition of marriage, argued Chambers, gay marriage would make society more accepting of further legal changes. By ceasing to conceive of marriage as a partnership composed of one person of each sex, the state may become more receptive to units of three or more.
Gradual transition from gay marriage to state-sanctioned polyamory, and the eventual abolition of marriage itself as a legal category, is now the most influential paradigm within academic family law.
Finally, Martha Minow of Harvard Law School deserves mention. Minow has not advocated state-sanctioned polygamy or polyamory, but the principles she champions pave the way for both.
Minow argues that families need to be radically redefined, putting blood ties and traditional legal arrangements aside and attending instead to the functional realities of new family configurations.
Ettelbrick, Polikoff, Fineman, Ertman, Stacey, Chambers, and Minow are among the most prominent family law theorists in the country.
They have plenty of followers and hold much of the power and initiative within their field. There may be other approaches to academic family law, but none exceed the radicals in influence.
-
-
Commentor
-
I just looked back a the title of this ...
Polyamory ( the state or practice of having more than one open romantic relationship at a time) already exists.
Its in ones mind and there is no legal way to stop it.
Even if there are though police it wouldn't stop it just make it illegal and such.Which my friends Makes this debate MOOT , that is if we are to remain on topic and not just retort about gay marriage
Polygamy now that is a legal and religious issue which can be regulated
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
bedeboop
-
Commentor:
Shoot, I misread it this whole time...thought POLYGAMY! :(
- 3 years ago
-
bedeboop
-
-
animalia_libero [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
animalia_libero [removed]
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
animalia_libero:
Good one!
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
animalia_libero:
I'd recommend that, but I've been having trouble recommending things lately. The page just scrolls up to the top. Anyone else experiencing that?
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
animalia_libero:
yeah since they've updated things, and a bit before that i've been running into glitches everywhere
- 3 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
Commentor
-
animalia_libero:
me 2 that sort of pasting links in response seems to be glitchy
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
Saladin
-
Polyamory is already state sanctioned soleil.
Bucket of FAIL.
In case you didn't know, it's not illegal to have multiple lovers.
- 3 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
That was 300 years ago, when those "founding fathers" said that. Society evolves, especially after three-hundred years. Back then, laws against homosexuality or women's rights were acceptable even in liberal countries.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
Commentor
-
FallenMorgan:
it was the age of enlightenment though
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
unimatrix0
-
Polyamory has no connection with gay marriage - linking them together is just a tired and trite scare tactic
Some people simply refuse to let go of their hate and ignorance. These people are usually older and not well educated.
Gay marriage is a moral litmus test. Those who oppose gay marriage simply lack the cognitive tools to come to a rational, well reasoned decision. The same kind of hate and ignorance that fought interracial marriage is fighting gay marriage.
The ignorance, hate and homophobia which is behind opposition to gay marriage is infuriating. Yet those who do oppose gay marriage deserve our pity. Imagine living in such darkness and fear, with out any true understanding of the world and the people around you. It is sad.
- 3 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
Commentor
-
unimatrix0:
Well said
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
soleil10
-
"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains.
A vtiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom"
Patrick Henry
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
bedeboop
-
soleil10:
If you do not believe in God, according to you, then you are bad and make bad decisions???? Hmmm.....So then, according to you, all these bad decisions being made in the world today are made by those who do not believe in God?
IRRATIONAL!
- 3 years ago
-
bedeboop
-
-
soleil10
-
"Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other "
John Adams
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
soleil10:
john adams was a deist.
- 3 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
soleil10
-
"Can the liberty of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God ?
That they are not to be violated but with His wrath ?I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just. "
Thomas Jefferson
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
Saladin
-
soleil10:
Too bad Thomas Jefferson wasn't Christian.
Rats!
- 3 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Commentor
-
Thomas Jefferson ->
"Of liberty I would say that, in the whole plenitude of its extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will. But rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual."Remember the original arguement was that if the constitution didn't speak to it .. the power was denied to the National Government.
After some discussion the Founding Fathers decided that some of the rights needed to be specifically protected since they were educated and well versed in how other governments had gone astray.
Thus the Bill of rights and the 1st amendment which allows for public discourse and information with desenting opinions protected as well as press and religion... as well as the right to petion for redress of grevinces which seems to have gotten abridged lately
and the 2nd amendment which gives the Sovereign people the right needed to protect themselves and the other rights
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
RCS
-
And we'll play the "Horst Wessel Lied" or "Onward Christian Soldiers" for you as you depart, whichever one you prefer.
- 3 years ago
-
RCS
-
-
DistantPlanet
-
This type of debate makes my head hurt. I don't understand why people feel that the actions of individuals within their own lives can somehow ruin life for the rest of us.
The United States has been and always will be a melting pot of different cultures, religions, values, beliefs, etc... Marriage is different in just about every single culture (and there are usually more differences within those cultures as well!) Also marriage is always changing with time. Thankfully most people these days (at least in this country) don't view it as "ownership" so much as a partnership. Those partnerships can take a lot of forms based on the people within them.
Laws regarding marriage have nothing to do with the morality of any issue, they simply guarantee the same rights and privileges to all married people... at least those we allow to marry. The fact that we are still debating whether to allow gays to marry is ridiculous. This is the bigotry of our time.
I don't know if society is quite ready for Poly relationships & marriages in mainstream, but don't try to tell me that amending marriage laws to accommodate another group of law abiding tax paying citizens is somehow immoral.
- 3 years ago
-
DistantPlanet
-
-
justright
-
Just goose step right on out.
- 3 years ago
-
justright
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
Save yourself the trouble and get packin' already!
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
soleil10
-
I am not going around and around discussing the same.
thing.Do what you want....
I am very clear on this. There is the law of cause and effect.
If Marriage is redefined, I will move my family where it is valued.
I do not plan and I am not paying the bill for what the moral decadence of this country is costing.
I am not paying for Wallstreet, for Washington, For GM
or the teachers unionWhen the governor of California is speaking of a financial Armagedon coming. I know it is coming
Look at all the signs around you.
One guy in Wallstreet just revealed a $50 B ponzi scheme under the watchful eye of the SEC.
There is a lot of denial going on for a long time.
I am not being an alarmist
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
anglcazn
-
soleil10:
Does that mean you're going to stop posting the same shit over and over again?
- 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
soleil10:
We can dare to dream, anglcazn!
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
soleil10
-
soleil10:
Anglcazn , Can you wash your mouth so we do not have to clean our ears.
For every profane word you have typed so far you should give $1 to a respectable charity.
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
soleil10:
"Bad words" are just words like any other. They're even in the dictionary!
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
anglcazn
-
soleil10:
hahaha! Is that all you really have? "Your profane language disturbs me!" Sorry, the word shit has been around a long time. Your feelings of comfort has no meaning to me.
- 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
Saladin
-
soleil10:
Better not swear anymore, soleil is gonna tell his mommy on us.
Besides, swear words makes the baby jesus cry. It's in the bible! No really!
- 3 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
Sol, it's completely clear that you have no idea what America is about, nor freedom, nor liberty, nor responsibility.
By saying that your marriage would be valueless you are literally giving up your own freedom and your responsibility to your marriage. Talk about slavery; you are a slave to your intolerance and small mindedness.
I hope you realize that you are one very few who will "lose hope" in America WHEN gay marriage becomes legal. How very sad for you.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
soleil10
-
DeliaTheArtist:
My marriage will not become valueless. The marriage in the state or the country I am living will become valueless.
This is why I will go where it still has value. So far in every state (30) where people where able to vote they have rejected the redefinition of marriage.
The two states where it is in existense is because of one vote by One lawyer in black robe.
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
anglcazn
-
DeliaTheArtist:
You say the same shit over and over again. One activist judge did this and one activist judge did that. Blah blah blah. Maybe, it's because they realized that it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL to ban same-sex marriages. Isn't that a bright idea?
- 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Also, how exactly would banning same-sex marriage protect children? What would it protect them from? Different ideas and world views?
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
anglcazn
-
At it again? I have to say, I give you an A for persistence. But for valid evidence and arguments, an F. Everyone has successfully argued against your intolerant ideas and yet, you still ignore our points and evidence because you cannot accept they are true. Plus, your argument that it open doors for other things is extremely old. It's a scare tactic and it's not going to work.
And remember, civil rights of an individual are more valuable than your comfort.
- 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
soleil10
-
anglcazn:
Not one person so far has denied the point made in this post.
SS marriage will open the door to any kind of dysfunctional behavior or addiction and the destruction of marriage itself
Meanwhile during the prop 8 campaign the No on 8 people kept saying that's was not true.
Animatrix instead of wasting your time on me, just go load another anti God post or a depraved sex post.
It will move to # 1 .They love you at current
You need to feed the animaltrix crowd. Tey are starving
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
anglcazn
-
anglcazn:
Learn how to use the "reply" button correctly. You're a broken record. Something that repeats a certain message until someone stops it.
OMG! SAME SEX MARRIAGE WILL DESTROY EVERYTHING!! Ha! Another load of BS. No valid study has been given that it will. You're using the same arguments for people who are against interracial marriages.
Let me say this again. Civil rights of an individual ARE MORE VALUABLE than your comfort.
Close that big, fat, intolerant, homophobic mouth of yours because you're not persuading anyone.
- 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
soleil10
-
This country was founded on liberty and responsibility.
Irresponsible liberty soon becomes slavery
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
soleil10:
What do you suppose then? Forced labor, banned homosexuality? Mandatory prayer in schools?
And we have the liberty to be what some might call "irresponsible," and if we screw up, groups like Planned Parenthood have the liberty to help us when we are in need due to our "irresposibilities." The government should not define morality. America is a nation of 300 Million and growing - we have different beliefs, views, and so on. We should not all be forced to abide by a government-sanctioned moral code.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
Commentor
-
do you not understand this country was founded on individual LIBERTY !!!
BTW ... in 1773 on the 16th of December some great people threw lots of tea in the harbor
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
soleil10
-
Marriage is serious and has a clear meaning.
It defines what it means to be a husband, a wife,a father and a mother.
It is connected to the meaning of life itself.
Why do you think over 7 miilions Califonians supported Porp 8 despite all the medias, most of the politiicans, the unions etc...etc calling them bigots, homophobe etc...etc.
The fabric of this country, the insititution of this country are based on the institution of the family.
Obama will faill because, he does not understand the huge $ cost of the family breakdown in America
He wants to bring this country together on what ?
On the values of Planned Parenthood that protect child rapitsts day and day out.
I wish him the best luck in the world
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
soleil10:
America is about individual liberty, not the mass hive action of the populace. Also, Planned Parenthood doesn't "protect" child rapists. It protects young girls from having rape babies, in this case, AND, they only have those few cases you speak of on the news, where they supposedly "protect" child rapists.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
soleil10
-
soleil10:
They do not report these rapists to the authority and cover up for them.
Another case just happened this week. There are many more than you think
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
Commentor
-
soleil10:
soleil10 what does this have to do with ss-marriage?
Planned parent hood, Rapists ?
oh some how allowing ss marriage will create more rapists?
Rape is Rape even between married people - so rape is't really part of this discussion
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
Commentor
-
soleil10:
soleil10 what does this have to do with ss-marriage?
Planned parent hood, Rapists ?
oh some how allowing ss marriage will create more rapists?
Rape is Rape even between married people - so rape is't really part of this discussion
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
"If marriage is redefined to be between two people of the same sex , then marriage as an institution has lost value for the millions and millions of people who commited to what it was."
So, it should be illegal because some people don't like it?
And also, why do people take marriage so seriously to the point that you'd leave the country just because some people have rights. Let people marry who they love, geez. You live your life, I'll live mine, let people live theirs.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
RCS
-
Gay marriage is already a fact in the United States and has been for several years now. Both Massachusetts and Connecticut have full same sex marriage, and in neither state will it be overturned.
So, marriage in two American states has been redefined, and for those who consider it to have lost its value if that happens, it has happened. So, those people should not consider themselves married anymore if that is how they feel.
Therefore, I would say, "Why wait to move to another country? What you have feared has come to pass. So, do it now. Move now!" I don't think that anyone will miss you.
- 3 years ago
-
RCS
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
That's ridiculous. If your marriage loses it's value because of what other people do, it's not very valuable at all.
Your doomsday predictions over gay marriage are unbelievable. Everyday "regular" heterosexual people defile marriage by cheating on their spouses, beating them, even killing them. How dare you put the weight of society's woes on the homosexual community exclusively!
"I and my family will move to the state or country that respect the value and the meaning of what marriage is." PEACE OUT!
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
soleil10
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Anyone cheating on his or her spouse has created a very sad situation for themselves, their children and their family
Still it does not redefines what the institution or the ideal of marriage is.
When the states redefines what marriage is, then, it is hopeless.
I have to go contribute to a country that believe and respect families
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
soleil10
-
If marriage is redefined to be between two people of the same sex , then marriage as an institution has lost value for the millions and millions of people who commited to what it was.
I will not consider myself to be married anymore and I and my family will move to the state or country that respect the value and the meaning of what marriage is.
That is a certainty. A country that has lost respect for its citizens to such degre is in my opinion doomed.
Gay activists do not understand that and do not care.
I wish them luck.America is now on the path to great suffering because of the course this country has taken during the last 40 years.
It is very sad to see but it is inevitable. It will get worse.
Depending on the state which is taking over everyhting that is falling apart will not do much
America has become arrogant and will be humbled
Just wait an see. - 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
Commentor
-
soleil10:
I hope you can genuinely respond to this question because I really don't understand why you object so ... nor do I understand what you're afraid of
You must be afraid of something as vehemently you're opposed to people having the same rights as others to their own family units.
- 3 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
anglcazn
-
soleil10:
HAHAHAHA! Omg, everything you posted resonated with so much hypocrisy that I just HAD to challenge it.
'That is a certainty. A country that has lost respect for its citizens to such degre is in my opinion doomed.'
HAHAHA! You mean how Prop. 8 was passed that stripped homosexuals their constitutional rights to marriage? Yup, I think we're there."Gay activists do not understand that and do not care.
I wish them luck."
Honey, you have it the other way around."America is now on the path to great suffering because of the course this country has taken during the last 40 years."
You mean the civil rights movements, gay rights movement, and the women rights movement? The only step back that we have taken is stripping homosexuals' rights."America has become arrogant and will be humbled"
Yes because you are a FINE example of it. - 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
soleil10
-
soleil10:
Anyone can marry , no rights were taken away.
If you look at the state of the family in America during the last 40 years.
It has gone down a lot.
ss marriage is the last nail in the coffin
This post is about what is hidding behing gay marriage.
The legalization of polyamory
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
anglcazn
-
soleil10:
Haha! Hoho! This gets funnier every time you post. Your ignorance is extremely hilarious! Your logic is worth making fun of.
Oooo! Scare mongering. Gay marriage will lead to polygamy! Oh no! The sanctity of marriage is therefore destroyed!
Sorry, like I said before, in the past, and will continue to say this. Your evidence is very weak and flawed. You have nothing but your discomfort to argue against something that is natural and a right to homosexual, and I repeat, GUARANTEED by our nation's constitution.
Didn't you say you were leaving?
- 3 years ago
-
anglcazn
-
-
bedeboop
-
soleil10:
America has become arrogant and will be humbled. Such an effective argument. Just really grabbed me.
- 3 years ago
-
bedeboop
-
-
soleil10
-
Then do not force everyone else to call it marriage and change what marriage is for them.
Doing as you please by forcing everybody to be part of it the issue.
Imposing a new definition of marriage on every body else and opening the door to every body else with another definition to impose it to is destroying it.
No one has that right.
- 3 years ago
-
soleil10
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
soleil10:
Nobody is forcing you to do anything.
If the law allows two men to get married, it's not forcing you to accept that as marriage. You have the right to live in whatever bubble you'd like.
You can just easily let two people get married, and just move on with your life. A man and a woman can still have a religious themed marriage, and whatnot.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
bedeboop
-
soleil10:
But, aren't you forcing people to bend to YOUR belief system by not allowing them to marry? What's the difference, ok for some but not others?
- 3 years ago
-
bedeboop
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
It's their right if they want to do so. It's not like America will devolve because a handfull of people are allowed to do as they please.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
