Can America clean up from its worst environmental disaster?
source: http://www.alternet.org/water/116933/can_america_clean_up_from_its_worst_environmental_disas...
-
-
- JackHerer
- added this
Editor's Note: You can watch an incredible photo slideshow of the effects of the coal ash sludge spill at the bottom of this story.
Harriman, TN - On December 26, 2008, the Roane County Codes Enforcement Office condemned three homes along Swan Pond Circle Road in Harriman, Tennessee, four days after 5.4 million cubic yards, more than 1 billion gallons, of coal combustion waste (CCW) slurry surged, "like a tsunami" according to residents, into the confluence of the Emory and Clinch Rivers after breaking a 40-acre holding pond at the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Kingston coal-fired power plant.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Green
-
- tags:
- News, News and Politics, Green, Environment, 5 more
-
-
WhiteNoise
-
GREENPEACE CALLS FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO COAL ASH SPILL
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press-center/releases2/greenpeace-calls-for-crimin... - 3 years ago
-
WhiteNoise
-
-
inspirationseeker
-
When this happened, a lot of the coal ash went into a nearby tributary of the Tennessee River. This river is the main water supply for Kentucky, Tennessee and Alabama and yet we are not hearing anything. I feel so badly for people who are being affected by this and may not even know. Is there not one media organization that is looking out for the "common man"? I guess I already know the answer.
- 3 years ago
-
inspirationseeker
-
-
Big_Mike_23
-
I watch CNN every day and swear I have not heard one damn peep about this. What a joke. I know all the media is biased to some extent, but I like CNN because they seem to be the least biased of the major news outlets.
I guess everyone thinks that Erin Brockovich was a cool movie and that THEY would NEVER let something like that happen if they had something to say. Think again. This will never see the news because they're paid off and this will all be swept under the rug while these poor people suffer. God Money wins again.
- 3 years ago
-
Big_Mike_23
-
-
arcticspirit
-
Between the local paper and another paper not far away test results seem to differ greatly. Very confusing. But TVA is in the process of cleaning it up.
- 3 years ago
-
arcticspirit
-
-
WhiteNoise
-
FAT CHANCE OF ANYTHING EVER HAPPENING IF THE PAST IS GARANT OF THE FUTURE...
Ten years after but who was to blame?
http://www.gregpalast.com/ten-years-after-but-who-was-to-blame-2/Court Rewards Exxon for Valdez Oil Spill
http://www.gregpalast.com/court-rewards-exxon-for-valdez-oil-spill/Nanwalek Rocks - Natives at Ground Zero of the Exxon Valdez oil spill
http://www.gregpalast.com/nanwalek-rocks-natives-at-ground-zero-of-the-exxon-val...Exxon suxx. McCain duxx.
http://www.gregpalast.com/exxon-suxx-mccain-duxx/"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." - Justice Louis D. Brandeis (1856-1941) US Supreme Court Justice
- 3 years ago
-
WhiteNoise
-
-
retran
-
WhiteNoise:
The Exxon spill has been cleaned up. It's official this year, and peer reviewed panel of scientists are pretty much in agreement over it. The controversy lingering was the amount of punitive damages Exxon should have paid out.
- 3 years ago
-
retran
-
-
WhiteNoise
-
WhiteNoise:
SAYS EXXON & MINIONS ?
PLEASE GIVES US A FEW LINKS TO BACK UP YOUR ASSESSMENT...
Legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
A special feature published by
the Anchorage Daily News.
http://www.adn.com/evos/evos.htmlHow much oil remains?
Based on the areas that were studied in the aftermath of the spill, scientists made estimates of the ultimate fate of the oil. A 2001 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) study surveyed 96 sites along 8,000 miles of coastline.
A pit dug on a Prince William Sound beach in 2001 revealing oil in the sediments. (Source: NOAA)
The survey distinguished between surface and buried oil. Buried or subsurface oil is of greater concern than surface oil. Subsurface oil can remain dormant for many years before being dispersed and is more liquid, still toxic, and may become biologically available. A disturbance event such as burrowing animals or a severe storm reworks the beach and can reintroduce unweathered oil into the water. Results of the summer shoreline survey showed that the oil remaining on the surface of beaches in Prince William Sound is weathered and mostly hardened into an asphalt-like layer. The toxic components of this type of surface oil are not as readily available to biota, although some softer forms do cause sheens in tide pools.The survey indicates a total area of approximately 20 acres of shoreline in Prince William Sound are still contaminated with oil. Oil was found at 58 percent of the 91 sites assessed and is estimated to have the linear equivalent of 5.8 km of contaminated shoreline.
In addition to the estimated area of remaining oiled beach, several other important points were evident:
Surface oil was determined to be not a good indicator of subsurface oil.Twenty subsurface pits were classified as heavily oiled. Oil saturated all of the interstitial spaces and was extremely repugnant. These “worst case” pits exhibited an oil mixture that resembled oil encountered in 1989 a few weeks after the spill—highly odiferous, lightly weathered, and very fluid.
Subsurface oil was also found at a lower tide height than expected (between 0 and 6 feet), in contrast to the surface oil, which was found mostly at the highest levels of the beach. This is significant, because the pits with the most oil were found low in the intertidal zone, closest to the zone of biological production, and indicate that the survey estimates are conservative at best. - 3 years ago
-
WhiteNoise
-
-
smizzle1
-
I can't believe that this is not on the news in pittsburgh
- 3 years ago
-
smizzle1
-
-
Angel4truth
-
TVA will fix it. Hope you guys enjoy e-orgasm. If you actually read a newspaper from the area you wouldn't be acting like this.
- 3 years ago
-
Angel4truth
-
-
nkeg87
-
What a fucking mess. Theyre more interested in damage control in terms of harmfulness of coal power plants and their image than they are of the actual disaster. They dont care. And as long as people dont make it an issue, it wont be one.
- 3 years ago
-
nkeg87
-
-
retran
-
nkeg87:
Where do you get the idea they're more interested in damage control (meaning their public image)? It's a disaster, probably could have been avoided. Now they have to pay for it. And they will.
- 3 years ago
-
retran
-
-
iloveravi
-
Of course you can clean it up. But Will you?
I doubt it.
We are too short sighted to actually take care of ourselves.
- 3 years ago
-
iloveravi
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
iloveravi:
So lemme get this straight:
I'm supposed leave my home state to go down to Tennessee to clean up a mess a corporation business made but will not pay to clean because I'M short-sided?
These people ruin our countryside for a bottom line, but they expect us to pick up after them like spoiled children just so they can do it again elsewhere. That is not MY short-sided viewpoint at work, that's spoiled rich bastards with too much money to burn.
They should be held accountable for the damages they've done to our enviorment and they should have pay to clean it, not hard-working and eco-friendly Americans(unless they happen to be the hard-working Americans paid by said company to clean this mess). It should be an outrage that this even happens, not an inevitabillity.
- 3 years ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
retran
-
iloveravi:
Hey lifestudent: The TVA is part of the U.S. Government. It's not a corporation. They're gonna fix it because there's 500+ lawmakers breathing down their throats.
- 3 years ago
-
retran
-
-
saucer
-
THE worst?
- 3 years ago
-
saucer
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
I think this is less of a question of "Can they do it?", and more of a question of "Will they do it?" because when it comes to enviormental issues the American government would rather cover up than clean up.
- 3 years ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
retran
-
lifestudentno83:
What evidence do you have of that? While there's lots of problems we have a pretty good track record of cleaning up massive high profile disasters like this. It's all the little disasters occurring everywhere we have a harder time with.
- 3 years ago
-
retran
-
-
retran
-
I keep hearing it reported on. There's a story here, but its going to be a long and complicated one.
The story with similar natural disasters has been a covering some multi-national corporation denying any wrongdoing, bilking the victims, with spokespeople saying absurd things.
But here the TVA has admitted guilt and promised to pay for all cleanup, and pay for all property and health damage.
That makes the news story a long-term one, and complicated. Not suited for tabloid style reporting like we're used to. The story will be how has it worked out for the victims months from now, years from now, etc. Has the TVA (US Govt) lived up to the promises.
- 3 years ago
-
retran
-
-
simplecj
-
-
Here's the slideshow.... this is tragic. I don't know if the news is covering it. I don't think I've seen anything on the BBC and I check that pretty often. Surprising how apparently the media is black-balling this story, why??
- 3 years ago
-
simplecj
-
-
Solar_Wind
-
-
Quoting an article by Dave Cooper from The Huffington Post "Coal ash contains heavy metals like mercury, arsenic, and lead. An article in Scientific American magazine dated Dec 13, 2007 states that coal ash is more radioactive than nuclear waste." I also found this video titled "TVA Coal Ash Contamination Kingston,Tn UMD" posted by youtube user "Anathapendika" showing Ground Zero on Chrismas Day. Enjoy!
- 3 years ago
-
Solar_Wind
-
-
ruebezahl
-
America can clean up after the disaster. But what will be the cost on ground water, drinking water, wildlife and agriculture? Anybody knows?
- 3 years ago
-
ruebezahl
