Community | January 21, 2009 | 14 comments

Holland's MP prosecuted for anti-Islam film

Image
InformedTexan
A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements.

Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made a controversial film last year equating Islam with violence and has likened the Koran to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf.

"In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to... draw a clear line," the court in Amsterdam said.

Mr Wilders said the judgement was an "attack on the freedom of expression".

"Participation in the public debate has become a dangerous activity. If you give your opinion, you risk being prosecuted," he said.

Not only he, but all Dutch citizens opposed to the "Islamisation" of their country would be on trial, Mr Wilders warned.

"Who will stand up for our culture if I am silenced?" he added.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Entertainment,   Politics
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Entertainment 4 more
  3.     
    |

14 comments // Holland's MP prosecuted for anti-Islam film

  • plusaf
  • Prijedor
  • RCS
    • 0
      RCS  
    • Something that should be made clear is that regardless of his politics of either the right or the left, Geert Wilders has never advocated violence against anyone, not anyone. When he made his film "Fitna," Muslims around the world, including ones claiming to not be radicals, called for his death.

      Once again, as I posted this before on another article on this bringing of charges against Wilders, here is a link to that film:

      http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=216_1207467783

    • 3 years ago
  • Scarabus
    • 0
      Scarabus  
    • The principle is widely accepted: Your freedom of speech does not allow you to shout “Fire” in a crowded theater. That the people trampling or being trampled to death might be stupid, evil, or religiously fanatical is irrelevant. Public safety trumps, same as it does when a murderer or drunk driver is arrested.

      To shout “Fire!” while standing on a secluded beach would be no problem, of course. In other words, it’s not what you’re saying that matters; it’s the circumstances prevailing when and where you’re saying it. So how does one know where the fuzzy dividing line falls? It’s determined by mounds of well documented experience, largely evident to common sense.

    • 3 years ago
  • nortey_2002
  • unimatrix0
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • unimatrix0:

      Agreed. Yet, freedom of speech does not mean censoring the other party. :) i.e. Asking Obama not to say anything religious in his Inauguration.

      I'm open to all criticism to Christianism, Catholics. :)

    • 3 years ago
  • atari_graphics
  • bluestranger
    • 0
      bluestranger  
    • It seems that the Dutch have a different version of freedom of speech than we do. How coul it be proven that he incites individuals to violence? So far the only violence that I am aware of is from the ones who wish to quiet him. The accepted ways to handle hate speech are to speak out against it or ignore it. Those that commit violence cannot use it as an excuse for their acts.

    • 3 years ago
  • petarro
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • This is ridiculous! "Mr Wilders has had police protection since Dutch director Theo Van Gogh was killed by a radical Islamist in 2004."

      Ohh, no, Islam is peaceful.

    • 3 years ago
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • Image
    • Let's see.

      Muslims: Do not talk to us because we accuse Islam as a Religion of hate and violence. Accuse your "brothers" for the Violence, hatred and blood in their hands.

    • 3 years ago
  • Prijedor
  • Scarabus
    • 0
      Scarabus  
    • This is one of those really tricky issues, isn't it. It's the difference between freedom to express an opinion and constraint against inciting to violence. A prime example in the U.S. is right-wing radio. Rory O'Connor's book Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America's Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives. The guy who walked into a U.U. church during a children's program and started shooting was a habitual listener and had three books by the shock jock in the car he drove to the scene of the murders.

    • 3 years ago
  • joshuaheller
  • InformedTexan
more from Community:
from the community

top videos