Marijuana cuts lung cancer tumor growth in half, Harvard study shows
source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm
-
-
- conservativelyliberal
- added this
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm
The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in common lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies.They say this is the first set of experiments to show that the compound, Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), inhibits EGF-induced growth and migration in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Lung cancers that over-express EGFR are usually highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy.
THC that targets cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 is similar in function to endocannabinoids, which are cannabinoids that are naturally produced in the body and activate these receptors. The researchers suggest that THC or other designer agents that activate these receptors might be used in a targeted fashion to treat lung cancer.
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Earth and Science, Health, 9 more
-
- tags:
- Green, Current TV, Earth and Science, Health, 5 more
-
-
Aaron_Brown
-
As ganja users have known for millennia, if applied properly, marijuana is extremely useful and has numerous health benefits. Sadly corporate Establishment propaganda has infected even the minds of smokers, evidenced by one of the posts here. A lot of people abuse cannabis, the same way they abuse alcohol, as an escape from the awfulness of their lives. Blaming a plant for that is a way to distract all of our attention away from the real problems. And there is a whole machine in place who make trillions of dollars a year keeping us all from seeing the truth.
The problem with most of the cannabis being consumed throughout the world, but especially in places where prohibition paranoia has reached the height of lunacy, like the United States, most folks get very poor quality product, that is filled with all kinds of contaminants, and is certainly not fit for human consumption. Anyone who's ever been to Amsterdam knows what I'm talking about. Cannabis that is grown under optimal conditions by experts, produces an herb of superior quality. So that the amount needed to achieve a desired effect is only one or two inhalations, or a small amount added to foodstuffs. It is of course not necessary to inhale smoke at all, that is only the quickest delivery method.
I predict that in the not-too-distant future, cannabis derived drugs and cannabis in its natural form will be prescribed by doctors to children, for various maladies. It will also be ration to our people in the military, much the way the British Navy rations ale and wine. Because God knows nobody needs a good high at the end of the day more than people in combat.
Little by little the majority of people are waking up from the corporate propaganda syndrome we have all been afflicted with, and a whole new generation of Young people will be able to avoid that disease altogether if we stand together against the threat these establishment controls continue to pose. They have always had an agenda, and that agenda has never been in the best interest of the majority or the minority.
- 12 months ago
-
Aaron_Brown
-
-
Piet_Smit
-
hm. Bit double. Those who smoke it inhale all kinds of carcinogens like tar. So the weed halves the growth of the tumor caused by the weed?
I know there are other ways, eating, tea, vaporisers etc.. But most people just smoke it. Don't fool yourself thinking that's healthy.
(a smoker myself btw) - 12 months ago
-
Piet_Smit
-
-
Cindy_Brooks
-
told ya.... all the thc offsets the nictine ima live forever....
- 12 months ago
-
Cindy_Brooks
-
-
Jason_Cool
-
reading all the people that left the comments on here. this makes me laugh and dont understand about weed and reality. i do smoke for stress. just think that what would it happen if the government allow weed to be legal. if it is then it would be a riot to mankind. because if it is legal then all the dealers would start a riot because over jealousy. a dealer is like a gang. its all about who is better then another in the hood. and it will be tax if it is legal because the government wants money. so it will be alot of riot. weed is like a addiction to cigarette, alcohol, crack or any man made product. including any pain killers is bad and addiction. so everything is bad but weed does help people out. another thing that cracks me up is that i saw and heard of a doctor that gives crack or meth to his patient because this person was in a coma so the blood will flow better or if the doctor didnt give the crack or meth then the patient is going to die. thats the first time that i heard and saw on what the doctor has to give to patient. but back to weed. just remember weed is the last thing that should help people out. because it is still bad for people. like loosing short term memories or if it is keep smoking weed then its and permanent memories lost. and that would suck. but help full of smoking the christmas tree (weed).
- 1 year ago
-
Jason_Cool
-
-
fuzduzit
-
Jason_Cool:
Jason you are so misinformed! Comparing weed to alcohol, tobacco, prescription meds, meth, and stating it is addictive is insane! Educate yourself! I know people that been smoking weed for 60 to 70 years with no ill effects, and no addiction! And memory loss, that is such bull crap! There are NO detrimental affects of smoking marijuana! 3000 years of use proves that!
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
Lee_Laverick
-
woop woop where eva u may be let the smoke run free lol
- 1 year ago
-
Lee_Laverick
-
-
Herbal_Minded
-
Healing Goodness
- 1 year ago
-
Herbal_Minded
-
-
ReneeGalligan
-
Love Robert Bennett's comment!!
- 1 year ago
-
ReneeGalligan
-
-
ReneeGalligan
-
Love Robert Bennett's comment!!
- 1 year ago
-
ReneeGalligan
-
-
ReneeGalligan
-
I obviously believe that cigarettes are a huge harm and give us cancer but why is that legal? And marijuana hasn't caused any deaths..and its illegal? Wtf. The government would clearly be out of debt with all the buyers in the world.
- 1 year ago
-
ReneeGalligan
-
-
matthau
-
That tumor seemingly was not inhibited by the presence of copious amounts of THC in his system is my point.
- 1 year ago
-
matthau
-
-
matthau
-
@Sarvepalli are you saying there was no tumor?
- 1 year ago
-
matthau
-
-
Sarvepalli
-
matthau:
No, I'm not saying that he didn't have a brain tumor. I'm just noting that it originated from skin cancer.
- 1 year ago
-
Sarvepalli
-
-
Sarvepalli
-
Marley got skin cancer on his foot which metastasized into his brain.
- 1 year ago
-
Sarvepalli
-
-
matthau
-
Sarvepalli:
@Sarvepalli are you saying there was no tumor?
- 1 year ago
-
matthau
-
-
matthau
-
Bob Marley died of a brain tumor. @Sharron look on the cover of Zig Zag rolling papers.
- 1 year ago
-
matthau
-
-
Sharron_Sawyer
-
1. question, can you picture Jesus smoking a joint?
- 1 year ago
-
Sharron_Sawyer
-
-
Sharron_Sawyer
-
I would smoke it in a minute if it was legal, I take 10/325 loratab for pain every day, but our country is making more money the way it is Good Luck smoking it, just don't get caught.
- 1 year ago
-
Sharron_Sawyer
-
-
Sarvepalli
-
This 2007 study was done as a followup to a more comprehensive study done the year before...The Tashkin Report. The Tashkin Report concluded that smoking marijuana, even heavy smokers, did not cause the problems associated with tobacco smoking. The fact is that marijuana prohibition isn't about health. It's about the cultural divide. Any research regarding how marijuana prohibition came about will dispel the myth that it was done for health reasons.
- 1 year ago
-
Sarvepalli
-
-
Ric_Aldrich
-
Unfortunately even the States that are using Medical marijuana are having problems from the justice department. More misdirection from the Obama Hate Machine
- 1 year ago
-
Ric_Aldrich
-
-
Nicholas_Leite
-
I wouldn't say the first time ever tested.
- 1 year ago
-
Nicholas_Leite
-
-
Robert_Bennett
-
To all you buzzkills below - People smoke cannabis because it's the cheapest deliver system. We would eat it if it weren't kept illegal and overpriced. And why do people who use alcohol get so jealous and hateful about people who like to consume a less dangerous drug.
- 1 year ago
-
Robert_Bennett
-
-
damitajo1
-
Sorry to rain on the parade. But: 1. the compound was INJECTED, not smoked; 2. the compound itself is already on the market for people who suffer certain illnesses; 3. smoking pot has its own hazards, according to the same website that contains this study. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080123104017.htm
- 1 year ago
-
damitajo1
-
-
fuzduzit
-
damitajo1:
I'm not able to finish reading that article that is absolutely, absurd unproven, and been dispelled many, many times! Simply more anti-marijuana propaganda! hemp oil is the key for treatment of cancer, a study was done in 1974 in partnership with the American Cancer Society titled" Why Do Cannabinoids Kill Cancer" notice the title was Why Do Cannabinoids Kill Cancer not DO they kill cancer, it's quite obvious from the title of the study that they knew it would work before they even started, but this is been buried by our government since 1974, in favor of big Pharma and the paper industry.
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
damitajo1
-
This doesn't mean you should smoke it. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080123104017.htm
- 1 year ago
-
damitajo1
-
-
Troy_Brown_Sr_
-
Before the arrival of western civilisation, the natives of all continents already knew this.
- 1 year ago
-
Troy_Brown_Sr_
-
-
Tony_Tay
-
How were the compounds administered...? Was it through inhalation of marijuana smoke or through other methods?
- 1 year ago
-
Tony_Tay
-
-
damitajo1
-
Tony_Tay:
not through smoking! check the original article for more info
- 1 year ago
-
damitajo1
-
-
fknjonas
-
one step closer....
- 1 year ago
-
fknjonas
-
-
Joe_Gunning
-
Cannabis shouldn't be illegal full stop. The only people its going to harm are those who are prone to mental illness if it runs in the family.
it can be used as medicine to get rid of pain with minimal side effects, used as a sleeping aid, appetite enhancer or just to straight up chill out.
Personally i smoke it to keep me relaxed and happy, and if being relaxed and happy is illegal then this world has gone crazy, its a god damn plant!! and it smells and tastes so nice and has many many uses!
you can smoke it for medicinal uses, relieve pain, induce sleep, gain appetite, make fuel from it, make plastics, fabrics....Clothes!!
Legalizing it full stop would cure so many worldwide problems but then again the big wigs who own the fabric corporations,police,governments and fuel companies etc would make less money as this wonder plant would knock them out of the water...
they cant tax it so its illegal.. All boils down to greed.
its illegal for the wrong reasons, do you research properly and make your decision for yourself! everyone has been lied to.
Cannabis is a multipurpose plant, Google it, you've all been fed propaganda since the 50s.. its so useful it'd put many non-green companies out of business. it cant be taxed therefore they make it illegal.
Free the weed. its a plant, it naturally grows in the ground...just like grass..what they gonna do next? start taxing us for the air we breathe??
Open your eyes.
- 1 year ago
-
Joe_Gunning
-
-
Jayne_Mahgagahbow
-
Joe_Gunning:
I agree with everything you've said...
- 1 year ago
-
Jayne_Mahgagahbow
-
-
ricklondon
-
Good to hear. It made my dear late Mom's life bearable in her last year of leukemia. I should not have had to go into rough areas to score (in rural Ms) but of course would do it again.
- 1 year ago
-
ricklondon
-
-
Cheryl_Miller1
-
And the truth goes on and on. When will people start to realize that there are a lot of us out there that have been saying this for years. Marijuana helps with many different issues. I hope they legalize it so we can begin to get back to a healthy society. Have a toke when totally stressed and see how it helps calm down.
- 1 year ago
-
Cheryl_Miller1
-
-
Jeffrey_Meek
-
Marijuana SHOULD BE LEGAL WHY LET RUTHLESS CRIMINALS MAKE THE MONEY? I LOVE THIS STORY AND WAY TO GO HARVARD UNIVERSITY BRING OUT THE TRUTH STOP THIS STUPID ENDLESS WAR ON DRUGS!!
- 1 year ago
-
Jeffrey_Meek
-
-
damitajo1
-
Jeffrey_Meek:
the compounds weren't administered through smoking.
- 1 year ago
-
damitajo1
-
-
readwhatupost
-
Jeffrey_Meek:
Did you actually read the study?
- 1 year ago
-
readwhatupost
-
-
Freedom911
-
What you need to know... The TRUTH!
Stop being told what the truth is... Look for that precious jewel on you own!>>> HARVARD UNIVERSITY STUDY
- 1 year ago
-
Freedom911
-
-
Patty_Peek_Brady
-
Study Finds No Liink Between Marijuana Smoking and Cancer
Reuters
May 24, 2006
Marijuana smoking does not increase a person's risk of developing lung cancer, according to the findings of a new study at the University of California Los Angeles that surprised even the researchers.They had expected to find that a history of heavy marijuana use, like cigarette smoking, would increase the risk of cancer.
Instead, the study, which compared the lifestyles of 611 Los Angeles County lung cancer patients and 601 patients with head and neck cancers with those of 1,040 people without cancer, found no elevated cancer risk for even the heaviest pot smokers. It did find a 20-fold increased risk of lung cancer in people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.
The study results were presented in San Diego Tuesday at a meeting of the American Thoracic Society
- 1 year ago
-
Patty_Peek_Brady
-
-
Sarvepalli
-
Patty_Peek_Brady:
That would be the Tashkin Report that you're referring to. Google it as well as the YouTube video of Tashkin's testimony before Congress for more. Bush buried the report so few know about it.
- 1 year ago
-
Sarvepalli
-
-
Dean_Sparaino
-
reading a lot of comments below about everything except how POSITIVE this article is...
I'v lost 2 loved ones to lung cancer in the last 4 years. If this study is accurate, this could be a game changer for lung cancer patients. I BELIEVE in Harvard Medical as one of their 'top guns' a gentleman by the name of Dr. Roman DeSanctis was my late Uncle, Domenick Sparaino's doctor and through his professional guidance, gave me and my Uncle 14 more years together.http://www.massgeneral.org/heartcenter/doctors/doctor.aspx?ID=16320
- 1 year ago
-
Dean_Sparaino
-
-
Joseph_Ratajczak
-
Regardless of facts on the pro or con side, the war on drugs in the U.S is doing about the same as it is in Mexico right now, a complete utter failure. Until we stop wasting money or trying to control nature we will be in debt internally to the wrath of the earth we live on.
- 1 year ago
-
Joseph_Ratajczak
-
-
fuzduzit
-
Joseph_Ratajczak:
The war on drugs should be directed at the pharmaceutical industry! true sign of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results, their war on drugs is a total insane failure and they are ignoring the fact that big Pharma constantly produces drugs that are good for nothing, they cure nothing, they simply mask symptoms! So here's some food for thought what is the last disease big Pharma cured?
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
kiwidave
-
Hi America please work hard at what you believe in. You must understand how what you do effects the world. Not because you are great but because your political machine is over run with lies and deceit. Your politicians do not have a vote, its the same here in New Zealand and Australia. We are controlled like you by the corporations. Find a new way of de-financing these companies. STOP giving them your money. Buy products made of HEMP. Don't be afraid you only have a short life be happy in it and help each other learn grow and make real change. Dont buy stuff in petrochemical plastic dont eat meat. Im i going too far? to bad its because i care and about you.
- 1 year ago
-
kiwidave
-
-
JoshuaPaull
-
The United States government wont legalise and tax marijuana for the simple fact that it is to easy to grow and they make more money on marijuana busts than they would in sales and taxing it in a years times... God Bless the USA but to hell with our crooked politicians
- 1 year ago
-
JoshuaPaull
-
-
Steve_Ahle
-
JoshuaPaull:
That's not true at all......lol..this isn't Fast & Furious where we put Marijuana into the hands of criminals so we can bust them later....How do we make more money busting people than taxing it? It costs $100,000 a year to house an inmate....The reason it's illegal is because it's ILLEGAL and A LOT of people still see it as a drug. Well whether us stoners like it or not THC is definitely a drug. And though it may leave my cognitive abilities intact while doing most activities....some people CANNOT handle it. An immediate cannabis legalization would lead to those kind of problems but we'd make a FUCK ton of money.....whoever told you we make more money arresting people is absolutely full of shit....that's just ridiculous....most people complain about how much money we could save if we stopped arresting small time pot smokers/dealers....which is a lot of fucking cake kid.
- 1 year ago
-
Steve_Ahle
-
-
Sten_Wie
-
Steve_Ahle:
Don't forget prisons are run by a corporation as well. Without prisoners, there would be no prisons and no influx of income to these parasites who seek nothing but to benefit at others misfortune.
- 1 year ago
-
Sten_Wie
-
-
JustinLark1
-
Steve_Ahle:
Your missing the forest because the trees are blocking your view. If drugs were decriminalized thousands of government employees would loose their jobs. Then there's all the companies that provide support for the drug war loosing money. It would help the economy because the government wouldn't take the money to funnel to their corporate partners in the drug war.
Your right when you say it cost a lot of money, but all that money goes to someone be it companies or government agencies. and neither wants to lose that money. Their are even lobbyist getting paid by police unions, and corporations to keep our failing drug laws in place. - 1 year ago
-
JustinLark1
-
-
Robert_Bennett
-
Steve_Ahle:
The money is made taking citizens personal property, which is then used to fund the police state. I guess you don't remember pre-drug war where police drove 15 year old vehicles and didn't have the right to violate somones personal freedoms or take their personal property( guns, houses, cars ,cash. jewerly, product).
- 1 year ago
-
Robert_Bennett
-
-
VeXHarbinger
-
Funny story, because I linked to this article on my FaceBook business page (http://www.facebook.com/Tripatourium), Facebook now says that I am promoting drug use and canceled all of my Facebook advertising. How is this article or study promoting recreational drug use?
- 1 year ago
-
VeXHarbinger
-
-
L338
-
I receive medical marijuana for mental health issues up in Canada and its the only medication that has helped me. My grades have gone up around 20% in college and it makes sleeping and eating possible.
- 1 year ago
-
L338
-
-
Cynyhia_Pahdocony
-
this would help our money woes,why not make this plant legal ? it seems to be the only thing that helps my friend after his cancer treatment..and everyone would benefit in the long run...greed is the real crime here...
- 1 year ago
-
Cynyhia_Pahdocony
-
-
KCfromGA
-
I am 60 years old and have Multiple Sclerosis. I've tried handfuls and handfuls of pharmaceutical drugs for pain, nausea, spasms and fatigue and ALL of them had side effects that added to the problems I was already experiencing.
When I've had the opportunity to use marijuana I felt much better. Living in Georgia, it's illegal but I'm hoping that common sense will prevail soon and op-posers will understand marijuana is helpful to a lot of sick and suffering people... possibly a member of their own family. Marijuana should be reclassified as a "medicine" to replace some of the harder drugs being prescribed that damage the liver and other organs.
- 1 year ago
-
KCfromGA
-
-
John_Tongue
-
I have friends who have cancer and i have seen how it also helps with nausea and appetite. Personally i suffer from 19 years with Multiple Sclerosis and can attest to it's benefits with regard to cramping and spasms. "T.H.C. works for me! (my personal opinion).
- 1 year ago
-
John_Tongue
-
-
fuzduzit
-
-
John_Tongue:
John you should watch this, it might be of great benefit to you, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLjgBLwH3Wc
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
Barbara_Bonacci
-
Wow .. wish my brother would have partook
- 1 year ago
-
Barbara_Bonacci
-
-
Lizzy_Graser
-
I do believe this would be true.
I take Dostinex, for an inoperable brain tumor, which has some pretty nasty side effects, which include vertigo, sleep apnia, mood swings, just a few of horrid side effects. I wish someone would have told me years ago, just just 2-3 puffs of green once a day will abate the side effects, making it so much more bearable.. My good friend, who is a nurse told me to try it, and it worked so well! - 1 year ago
-
Lizzy_Graser
-
-
Guavaman1
-
Yes I would like a link if possible. Having a friend in Tulsa recently diagnosed with Stage 4 Lung Cancer it's something we already know. However he's a veteran in Oklahoma and he'll never get legal medical marijuana,. . not here.
- 1 year ago
-
Guavaman1
-
-
Jon_Sylvester
-
Guavaman1:
He could if he has cancer because its a federal thing not state.
- 1 year ago
-
Jon_Sylvester
-
-
Karlie_Cole
-
Can we get a link to the study?
- 1 year ago
-
Karlie_Cole
-
-
Mic_Jordan
-
MJ is healthful. Not in any way carcinogenic. The "scientific research of Drew_Stoller" is the equivalent to waterboarding someone to death and then stating that the patient died because he was allergic to water. Dump the justice department trolls please ;=)
- 1 year ago
-
Mic_Jordan
-
-
bubbums123
-
Drew_Stoller - There is not a single recorded case of cancer being caused from smoking marijuana. Not one. Smoking marijuana has in no way shape or form been correlated with causing cancer.
- 1 year ago
-
bubbums123
-
-
HowardTLewisIII
-
Free the weed.
- 2 years ago
-
HowardTLewisIII
-
-
Edward_Ober
-
I wonder if this means that people who smoke pot and cigarettes are less likely to get lung cancer than people who only smoke cigarettes? Any thoughts on that?
- 2 years ago
-
Edward_Ober
-
-
Drew_Stoller
-
Edward_Ober:
No. THC is the culprit for the reduction in tumor growth rate, not marijuana itself. Smoking marijuana has carcinogenic effects. Vaporizers, however, are fine. The important distinction to make here is that there is no conclusive evidence to show that it actually cures the cancer. What it does is aid in treatment, slow the progression of the cancer, and hopefully give medical professionals time to actually treat the person. And as always, it really depends on the type of cancer it's being used to treat. Not every treatment helps with every cancer.
- 2 years ago
-
Drew_Stoller
-
-
Andre_Illuminati
-
Edward_Ober:
I am pretty sure that's a "yes, marijuana smokers are healthier than non-marijuana smokers, even in the case if both are cigarette smokers." Pretty sure that has been confirmed by similar studies.
- 2 years ago
-
Andre_Illuminati
-
-
KingMoonraker
-
-
Drew_Stoller:
I don't think what you are saying is necessarily true. This is one of many studies that show a positive ( anti cancer ) correlation - and not just from THC - from the whole plant. The plant has a lot of chemicals in it. Trying to separate out constituent chemicals may not be the right approach.
For instance, look at the study by anti drug researcher Dr. Donal Tashkin at UCLA. He expected to find a positive correlation between heavy marijuana use and COPD and lung cancer, but instead found an inhibitory effect:
http://stopthedrugwar.org/speakeasy/2009/jun/03/top_antidrug_researcher_changes
- 1 year ago
-
KingMoonraker
-
-
Drew_Stoller
-
KingMoonraker:
You are misquoting him. He did not find an inhibitory effect, what his study showed was that there was no noticeable correlation. That is one isolated study in a sea of many studies with many varying results.
Not to be a dick, but I get the feeling you don't have any formal scientific education. If THC is responsible for a reduction in growth-rate of a tumor, then any other chemicals contained in marijuana would have no effect on the treatment. THC is THC regardless of whether it's in pot or not. It's a molecule. Nothing more, nothing less. If THC is only part of a cocktail that is beneficial, then it's not just the THC that is helping, futhermore it isn't *only* possible to administer that kind of treatment through the use of marijuana. Local treatment is not the same thing as lighting up a joint.
Try to keep in mind, I am fully behind not just the decriminalization of drug use, but the legalization of it. As I said, though, one side saying something is the end of society as we know it while the other pretends it's a miracle substance serves no one. There needs to be an open dialogue that simply isn't happening. There are some pretty decent studies being done, the one the article you linked cites is a large one, but there is nothing in the way of real volumes of studies being done. Part of that is because of the anti- side of this debate being in control right now. It takes a lot of research for medicinal *anything* and the only way we'll ever know exactly what is going on is if the right volume of research is being done.
- 1 year ago
-
Drew_Stoller
-
-
Amanda_Mullinex
-
Drew_Stoller:
So, you're for legalization of all drugs? Is this a "the government can't tell me what to do with myself" type thing, or is there some other reason. I don't think legalizing heroin, crack/cocaine, meth or anything else is going to help anything or anybody, and most likely would make things worse. I do though, think marijuana is a drug that actually has potential to help many things. Another may be X, but my interest doesn't lie there.
- 1 year ago
-
Amanda_Mullinex
-
-
KCfromGA
-
Edward_Ober:
When using medical marijuana everything I've read recommends using a "vaporizer" for "smokeless" delivery. Cigarettes? Just say no!
- 1 year ago
-
KCfromGA
-
-
KCfromGA
-
Drew_Stoller:
If it helps a fellow human being that is suffering even a little, in my mind there is no other answer than to allow them to try it and see if it helps.
- 1 year ago
-
KCfromGA
-
-
Jenna_Earnest_Laudel
-
Edward_Ober:
yes. if you smoke weed and cigarettes you are.... i think it was like 30% or something less likely to get lung cancer than someone who just smokes cigarettes
- 1 year ago
-
Jenna_Earnest_Laudel
-
-
damitajo1
-
Drew_Stoller:
thanks for saying this. problem: no one will listen.
- 1 year ago
-
damitajo1
-
-
fuzduzit
-
Edward_Ober:
in my opinion the main problem with commercial cigarettes are all the additives, no matter how you look at it chemicals, synthetic man-made chemicals are our enemy! if you go to smoke cigarettes you should at least smoke organic cigarettes and roll your own and you can quit!
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
fuzduzit
-
Drew_Stoller:
there is tons of conclusive evidence that hemp oil from high potency marijuana cures cancer, there is no doubt about it, the lies are coming to an end because we know now that we have been lied to for profit, they don't give a rats ass if we die from cancer they don't want to cure cancer because they make way too much money treating it, and way too much money with research. Cancer research is the biggest scam on the planet!
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
fuzduzit
-
Drew_Stoller:
another interesting fact is, virtually everything that can be made from timber, crude oil, and cotton, can be made from hemp! I say let's put the farmers back in business, screw the Middle East, screw big Pharma, screw the petroleum industry, screw our POS government!
- 12 months ago
-
fuzduzit
-
-
Dquixote1217
-
It is good to see information such as this finally making its way into the mainstream.
The government and mainstream science has long known about the anti-cancer and other benefits of marijuana. Sadly, politics and the influence of the big drug industry has kept that information hidden and suppressed. See:
"Two studies about marijuana cancer benefits you probably never read about"
http://www.tbyil.com/Marijuana_Cancer_Studies.htm - 2 years ago
-
Dquixote1217
-
-
KingMoonraker
-
Dquixote1217:
Interestingly, I can't find it on mainstream media. Go to CNN's Web site - for example - and search for the study. Go to Google News and search for it and every link is to a non mainstream source.
- 1 year ago
-
KingMoonraker
-
-
Yami_Saleh
-
This is absolutely right. It worked on me, I had a tumour for ages, but now its almost gone.
- 2 years ago
-
Yami_Saleh
-
-
Muzikayise
-
anything that was put on this earth in plant form is good for you, only if it’s used in moderation
- 2 years ago
-
Muzikayise
-
-
Flibberdy_Gibbet
-
yeah absolutely stupid that weed's not legal yet. Talk about a stupid thing to ruin peoples' lives over. If you still believe people deserve hard time for pot, you need to join the rest of us in this century.
- 2 years ago
-
Flibberdy_Gibbet
-
-
KCfromGA
-
Flibberdy_Gibbet:
It does seem quite barbaric... think of all the children that have lost their parents to jail... think of all the overcrowding of the jails... think of all the people with health problems that continue to suffer. Common sense, where are you?
- 1 year ago
-
KCfromGA
-
-
Schelly_Frane
-
good to know
- 2 years ago
-
Schelly_Frane
-
-
Diabolik
-
this was already known....
google for montreal mcgill university canabis study shrink tumors
- 2 years ago
-
Diabolik
-
-
Gabriel0465
-
Until the government can figure a way out to tax/regulate it, marijuana will remain illegal. Same thing happened with tobacco and alcohol. Hemp was legal until Anslinger got it classified as Sched 1, along with Heroin and cocaine. Then Nixon and finally Reagan. Sure wouldn't mind a drug test on the latter back in his "Hollywood" days... Carter considered it but was pressured otherwise. Then there was one who said he didn't inhale (deception indicated), quite funny.
If legalized one would have to fight the pharmaceutical companies as they DON'T want it legal. On the medical side it would eliminate most antidepressants, ADD/ADHD, et al.. no need for valium or xanex or the like.
Textile and fuel wise, the market would explode as industrial use of hemp could replace many items at a cheaper cost. Paper, clothes, rope, fuel, food... the list goes on.
Regarding the safety issue, more people have died by alcohol, Rx & tobacco in the time it took to read this than marijuana has since God put it on the planet...
Man made alcohol/Rx, God made marijuana.. who do you trust? - 2 years ago
-
Gabriel0465
-
-
Will_Holder
-
Gabriel0465:
Heroin, a trademarked medicine by Bayer Pharmaceuticals. Have a nice day it is big business as usual.
- 1 year ago
-
Will_Holder
-
-
Gordon_Soderberg
-
This has been known for years but the AMA and the drug companies as well as their benefactors in congress and the senate have refused to admit it and prevented clinical studies for decades. Yet, they will tell you that putting radiation in your system is a good idea.
When a pharma drug commercial comes on, by the time the commercial is over I've forgotten what they treat because the list of potential lethal effects are so long.
This is a none lethal, non habit forming, preventative medicine for many more illnesses than this small study suggests. Made into a ointment it clears up skin conditions, ingested it helps with digestion, put into a save it relief pain from Arthritis. It also helps patients deal with all those side effects caused by petrochemical drugs that have been forced on us since 1927.
- 2 years ago
-
Gordon_Soderberg
-
-
Michael_Wilson
-
Gordon_Soderberg:
wow. good way to put it.
- 2 years ago
-
Michael_Wilson
-
-
locdasmoke
-
It's time to legalize Marijuana for everybody!
- 2 years ago
-
locdasmoke
-
-
james1seattle
-
My neighbor two doors down has a script for medical marijuana. He sells more than half to anyone that will buy it at twice it's original price. My cousin has a script and uses it ONLY to get high. In CA studies by proponents of medical marijuana want tougher guidelines because of abuse. I don't have any problem with people getting high, Just say you want to get high. Lose the bullshit. Give it to people that need it, keep it out of the hands of children. I don't want children in this world to end up like all the potheads from my youth who have accomplished little or nothing. A sure sign of the dangers of giving people marijuana are the many people commenting here that cannot spell or even put a sentence together. Or the ones that believe that you must use caps lock to make a point. The shit is very deep here!
- 2 years ago
-
james1seattle
-
-
Jay_Miller
-
james1seattle:
While I agree there are those out there that abuse the medical marijuana privilege, I don't think that can be said for most. There will always be some people in a group that take advantage or abuse. That being said, I seriously doubt most people with a medical condition severe enough to be prescribed marijuana are abusing it. And frankly if they are, so what. Most of them are probably knocking on deaths door so let them have their fun and get high. As far as keeping it away from kids, pshhh! Kids smoke it the most and they'll get it one way or another regardless of any laws that are in place to stop it. They're not supposed to have alcohol either but so no amount of liquor laws can prevent that. I smoked a little pot in my youth and I'm not some deadbeat base head living in my parent's basement. One could argue that the potheads from your youth wouldn't have amounted to anything anyways, pot or not. Some people just lack a clear direction in life. Could it be because they smoked pot? Sure but I know quite a few people from my youth who smoked copious amounts of weed and are very successful today. Pot does not make people lazy. Some people are just lazy by nature or lazy by nurture. The fact is, people need to overcome the stigma of marijuana and realize it for the miracle drug it has the potential to be. Why continue to ban a substance that has no health risks and many health benefits while at the same time alcohol, which kills thousands every year because of the many health issues it causes?
- 2 years ago
-
Jay_Miller
-
-
Petur_Stefansson
-
Jay_Miller:
Couldn't have said it better myself.
- 2 years ago
-
Petur_Stefansson
-
-
Drew_Stoller
-
Jay_Miller:
I mostly agree with your statement, but you need to understand that smoking marijuana does have health risks. If you're going to tout it as a drug with no health risks you need to be specific in saying that when used with a vaporizer or ingested there are no known risks. Smoking pot does have carcinogenic effects and it puts more tar per joint in your lungs than a cigarette. Excessive use can lead to emphysema and COPD. To put it another way: I am for the legalization of marijuana (as well a all drugs), but I am also very much in favor of an open, honest dialogue. Pot is not a miracle drug anymore than it is the devil's ultimate weapon sent to destroy humanity. It is a recreational drug that also happens to have clinical benefits. So do opiates. Cocaine does as well. It's still used as a topical anesthetic before surgery.
- 2 years ago
-
Drew_Stoller
-
-
Jacob_Newsom
-
james1seattle:
How many "potheads" from your youth have you followed into adulthood to see whether or not they have "accomplished" anything in their life? Furthermore, how to you define accomplishment?
"A sure sign of the dangers of giving people marijuana are the many people commenting here that cannot spell or even put a sentence together."
I think what you are trying to do here is draw a connection between marijuana use and poor grammar? Regardless- if THC can mitigate or stop the spreading of cancerous tumors then isn't poor grammar a necessary tradeoff?
- 1 year ago
-
Jacob_Newsom
-
-
KCfromGA
-
Drew_Stoller:
Marijuana doesn't have any carcinogenic effects, but if you believe it does and ever need to use it to help a health problem someday, I would advise using a "vaporizer" that is smokeless... the vapor has NO smoke.
- 1 year ago
-
KCfromGA
-
-
shawnnyboy
-
Now now Brenda Coleman.....You are super concerned about the government. Yes they lie ALL THE TIME. But these stories about good things are sometimes legit. The world is changing to the point where things that hurt the rich elite get out. The marijuana therapy stuff is true. Brenda just back off a little and you will be closer to the truth.
- 2 years ago
-
shawnnyboy
-
-
Brenda_Coleman
-
THE GOVERNMENT IS JUST FULL OF CRAP. THEY WANT CONTROL OVER THIS TO MAKE MONEY LIKE THEY DO EVERYTHING ELSE. AND I'M SURE THEY ALREADY KNEW THIS WOULD HELP CURE CANCER. THEY DON'T CARE. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY. IT RULES AMERICA.
- 2 years ago
-
Brenda_Coleman
-
-
Anne_Leblanc
-
Brenda_Coleman:
A couple of years ago, I visited in Ottawa, a huuuuuuge warehouse where the RCMP keeps all the weeds they seized. They burn a small part to look good on tv and the store the rest. When its legal, they will sell it back to the people at double price!!!!!
- 2 years ago
-
Anne_Leblanc
-
-
Drew_Stoller
-
Brenda_Coleman:
Easy there, cowgirl. It doesn't cure cancer, it slows the progression of some forms of cancer. Big difference.
- 2 years ago
-
Drew_Stoller
-
-
David_Eric
-
the best in the world.it can save the world.but the government sucks it always sucked and always will suck,even if this was all legal the coverment would suck.this grows wild and the fucking goddam government takes it from us.it is the governments fault we all are dieing fuck you government suck my fucking cock
- 2 years ago
-
David_Eric
