Community | February 09, 2009 | 205 comments

Marijuana cuts lung cancer tumor growth in half, Harvard study shows

Image
The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in common lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies.

They say this is the first set of experiments to show that the compound, Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), inhibits EGF-induced growth and migration in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Lung cancers that over-express EGFR are usually highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy.

THC that targets cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 is similar in function to endocannabinoids, which are cannabinoids that are naturally produced in the body and activate these receptors. The researchers suggest that THC or other designer agents that activate these receptors might be used in a targeted fashion to treat lung cancer.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Earth and Science,   Health,   9 more
  2. tags:
    Green Current TV Earth and Science Health 5 more
  3.     
    |

205 comments // Marijuana cuts lung cancer tumor growth in half, Harvard study shows

  • Paul_Ingram
  • TonyRao
  • TonyRao
    • +1
      TonyRao  
    • Buy the Documentary, "What if cannabis cured cancer" It's a real 'eye-opener' to those still on the fence concerning Marijuana. For the rest of us the question should be tied to a brick and tossed through the windows of the Federal government and at the head of the DEA, CIA and FBI.
      Some of the comments here are so ignorant, I won't even respond.

    • 1 year ago
  • Richie_Latham
  • Cynyhia_Pahdocony
  • RoyChapman
    • +3
      RoyChapman  
    • ITS PURE MOTHER NATURE UN TOUCHED BY MAN MAID POISONS! WTF??
      They'll let me get addicted to OPIETS or sit at home & die of alcohol poisening & continue to let tobaco co's PUT CHEMICALS IN CIGARETTES! (thats OK)
      Shows how much they care about our wellfare, howmany cancer docs kemo clinics radiation places would close? O_o

    • 1 year ago
  • RoyChapman
    • +1
      RoyChapman  
    • Un fuckin believable that this AND ALL THE OTHER medical qualities ARE IGNORED BY THE US!!!!!! THEY WANT WAR ON DRUGS??? Lets up the ante!!! (sp?) fuck that, if i go to jail fow pot, hunger strike till i die THEN ITS ON THEIR HANDS! sorry. It pisses me off alil.

    • 1 year ago
  • Nicolas_Espinal
    • +5
      Nicolas_Espinal  
    • the history of our continent before columbus says we used it for religious and medicinal uses the control of pain or elimination of it is our specialty all natural herbes should never have being discriminated /prohibited in any way shape or form all jailed for it should be released stop all bans defend history and the natives

    • 1 year ago
  • Cherryl_Purcell
    • +3
      Cherryl_Purcell  
    • If you are a Canadian watch for the S10 Bill in canada. It will not matter that it can save you the government here will pass the bill saying anyone carrying will be charged. Making edibles will get you 18 mths in jail. People who are unable to smoke because of asthma, use this to keep them calm. Cancer patients use it help them eat. Fibro Mialgia patients use help them eat and helps with their pain. If marijuana helps with lung cancer this will not be any good to us in Canada once this S10 bill is passed.

    • 1 year ago
  • Barry_Linendoll
  • dragon83uk
    • +1
      dragon83uk  
    • Why is this not headline news everywhere? The strength of cannabis against cancer is not a new thing, watch "What if Cannabis cured cancer?", a movie about various scientists researching the benefits of this plant. It's disgusting how little coverage this is getting. Surely now people can see that the rewards cannabis offers far outways the risks. Risks that the majority need not worry about. Prohibition of cannabis because of mental health risks is like prohibiting peanuts because some people are allergic!
      People need to stop bowing to the Daily Fail retards and end this ridiculous war on a plant. Maybe then we can start protecting against it's few dangers, most of which are caused by the very "tough stance" that's supposed to be there to help!

      http://youtu.be/pnP8IugJCHM

    • 1 year ago
  • Ella333
    • +3
      Ella333  
    • When there are more adverse health conditions and deaths related to sugar, alchohol, coffee and tobacco consumption and all these are legal , one has to ask why is cannabis not??? Ok smoking it is not right for some but hey i see more alchoholics in a bad way than pot heads, and there are more adverse effects from many pharmacutical drugs or even food additives such as aspartame (http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2Fdr-mercola...) which is a known poison in our food chain as a sweetner... What's really going on here ??? As for gateway drugs I blame e numbers and sugar... this is where kids learn from an early age that getting a buzz is good !!!

    • 1 year ago
  • hempbuilder
  • Daffydave
    • 0
      Daffydave  
    • plant of the gods.
      Oh weren't we made in the image of god?
      I think that say's it all.
      that's my understanding
      Lawful not legal

    • 1 year ago
  • galwayman
  • Scooter_Tramp
  • ROyani
  • AstrologerSalvadorRusso
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • http://current.com/groups/make-marijuana-matter/
      Make Marijuana Matter Group
      Hemp Helpers please join this Group
      Stand Up for your Rights
      Lets Get Cannabis on current....
      Lets get our voice Heard !!!
      The war on drugs is working! The war on drugs makes Americans slaves! It makes pharmaceutical companies rich!. It makes drug lords powerfull and dangerous.! I ensures that kids can get pot easier than they can get beer ! It prescribes medical marijuana in the hospital. Then arrests patients in the courtrooms when they dont buy from them.The war on drugs is working!!! Against the will of the American people>
      despite what harvard studies show ?

    • 2 years ago
  • MycoJ
  • SuckMyTNS
    • 0
      SuckMyTNS  
    • This sounds great i hope it really goes somewhere and helps lots of people, even more then it has already. Most "stoners" smoke at ease anyway, so its not like we are dying to legalize it. Even if it is in a pill, who cares? smoke weed everyday, and if you don't at least dont be so judgemental.

    • 3 years ago
  • Kev_Dawg
  • river_rollin
    • 0
      river_rollin  
    • we all know that pot is good for you, tell me something new, how about... all the white uptight republicans smoke it too!! you know, the same ones that keep it illegal so they dont loose their money

    • 3 years ago
  • shibumi0202
  • AuralElixirGirrrl
  • Khidrock
    • 0
      Khidrock  
    • The possibility of making and legalizing other forms of THC than smokable, for medical purposes would at least open the doors for people to accept that unlike a lot of chemicals in this world, THC isn't exactly harmful or bad. I believe it would, but it could start the wheels of a change in the mentality of people on pot, that would be passed down from generation to generation and the "Reefer Madness" mentality might be more so eradicated.

    • 3 years ago
  • idealist
  • Broadswordcallin
    • 0
      Broadswordcallin  
    • More great news in the vote for hemp.

      Go Jack Herer this is the sort of news the people and so called governments need to hear.

      Take it easy out there,
      Broadsword Callin.

    • 3 years ago
  • KaT_Trina
  • 02
    • -1
      02  
    • But it also shrinks the rest of your cells. Brain cells just sit there. Tested subjects can't even get up.

    • 3 years ago
  • awareness2010
  • denport
  • Lippey
    • 0
      Lippey  
    • Maybe by using a vaporizer? Or eating it? Because I can't imagine smoking out of a bowl being good for your lungs with all the resign that builds up in a bowl.

    • 3 years ago
  • Sativa28
    • 0
      Sativa28  
    • Lippey:

      vaporizers are wonderful but i'll never put away my bowl. if youre an avid glass user like i am than you should know how to keep it clean...save the rez if you want. i take care of my pieces just like i take care of my body. i agree with those above like 3_8_2. id much rather hit my bowl than down some chemically fused pills for a headache or some cramps.

    • 3 years ago
  • gepma44
    • 0
      gepma44  
    • iF THE GOVT WAS MAKING MONEY OFF OF POT YOU COULD FIND IT AT 7 ELEVEN RIGHTBESIDEYHE ATM MACHINE WHICH HAPPENS TO BE RIGHT BESIDE THE BOXES OF SUPER CRISP AND THE CONDOM DISPLAY

    • 3 years ago
  • Hoax_Productions
    • 0
      Hoax_Productions  
    • Ya, while you have it in your system, the cannibanoids prevent cancer growth and spreading. However, the smoke inhalation causes damage that can turn into cancer after you quit.

      What a duel edged sword!

    • 3 years ago
  • Gabriel0465
    • 0
      Gabriel0465  
    • Hoax_Productions:

      Part of what makes it help is the coughing effect the marijuana has on the consumer. The coughing moves stagnant fluid that would otherwise end up as pneumonia as well as the recent discoveries.

      That dual edge sword goes the same with "Popping a Pill." All pills do damage to your liver and kidneys. Im still waiting to find out if my liver will be ok in the future do to all the "Ranger Candy" (800mg Motrin) the Army gave out for everything from a headache to broken ribs.

      At least with the marijuana, the control is in the smokers hands. Smoke too much and all that happens is you go to sleep, generally after eating something. Still, more people die by aspirin today than marijuana has killed since the dawn of time.

    • 1 year ago
  • awareness2010
  • 3_8_2
    • 0
      3_8_2  
    • That's nice to hear. :)
      Seriously, marijuana can be more beneficial then a lot of the chemicals and pills that we put into our bodies everyday. It can help with headaches, nausea, decrease in appetite(haha munchies), and so much more.
      It would be much better for you to take a marijuana supplement, then to take Tylenol.

      We need to start working with it more to help us instead of being so against it.

    • 3 years ago
  • sickinjersey
  • AxeRFJ
  • JETaylor
    • 0
      JETaylor  
    • Maybe we all should take a hit before we accept this trillion dollar bailout.
      No wait I have a better idea tell congress to take their package set off to the side roll a couple dozin blunts go back in write another one then compare the two.
      o yea we where talking about health issues sorry.

    • 3 years ago
  • theblackwhitewarrior
  • Rethink_Drugs
  • Tommyjolly
    • 0
      Tommyjolly  
    • Edit to the replies of my comment: Unbelievable how rude people act. I was just pointing something out that's all.
      You act like I personally insulted you. Ridiculous.

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
    • 0
      SDLN  
    • In science, one study begets another.

      Back in 2006, a study by UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine, led by Dr. Donald Tashkin, found that "[l]ong term or heavy use of marijuana does not cause lung or neck cancers even though marijuana produces more resin and tar than tobacco."
      http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/6811.html/

      Dr. Tashkin explains, "“We know that there are as many or more carcinogens and co-carcinogens in marijuana smoke as in cigarettes. But we did not find any evidence for an increase in cancer risk for even heavy marijuana smoking."

      The study confounded many. This new study helps fill in some of the gaps. I can't wait to find what we learn next. Excellent post.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • I don't understand why people complain about the "content" on Current- when I look at the homepage I see stories about weed, the economy, AIDS, robots, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Afganistan, Australia AND Beijing, the environment, health issues...I mean really, some of you don't think there is enough variety and worldly awareness? Srsly?

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
    • 0
      SDLN  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      I'm in complete agreement, Delia. Even if a topic isn't on the front page at the present time, all one has to do is type a word or two in the search bar to find what one is looking for. Add a comment, vote it up, and things happen. And if something happens to be missing from Current, everyone has the ability to add it themselves. That's the beauty of user-created content.

      Personally, I find these "off" topics educational. Considering the circles that I run in, I wouldn't have known almost anything about, say, GMOs, biofuels, etc. had certain Current users not been so persistent with their posts.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I must agree vigorously that this topic is extremely relevant in so many ways. It has reached a tipping point in the American consciousness. We must continue to speak and care about this issue because it will bring a dramatic and sudden change to America. It will mean economic freedom for millions of people. It will give people something that they can use to heal themselves and not be at the mercy of hospitals and insurance companies; pharmaceutical companies and industry political lobbyists. It will result in the saving of billions in dollars spent on the failed prohibition policy. It will unlock billions in revenue for many industries resulting in millions of jobs. Legalization would render a tremendous blow to the violence plaguing our southern border.

      I could go on and on. But most importantly, it will help the environment by providing an extremely cheap and renewable energy source for bio fuels that won't harm the planet. The methacellulose fibers in cannabis are easily converted into energy and when that energy burns it has a higher octane resulting in a more complete burn that basically results in water vapor.

      The fiber can be used for paper so that instead of cutting down trees that take 25 to 50 years to harvest, you can use a plant that will produce the same amount of fiber per acre in only one year.

      The fiber could be used for rope, fabrics of many kinds, wood products such as moldings, fiber boards, building products of many kinds, insulation, the list goes on and on.

      This is precisely why this issue is every other headline. This is why it has become the hot button issue on Current. Because it promises to bring about a miraculous recovery of America and empowerment to millions of working class people.

    • 3 years ago
  • myndperception
  • thewarnerla
  • Agent_Alpha
  • MojoNojo
    • 0
      MojoNojo  
    • the possible reality this may prove is that we as a country may claw our ways out of this ignorance and hypocritical laws and even though it may cause cancer...it isn't physically addictive... but cigarettes are...so why is it illegal...it we decriminalize it... THC can be used in baking and other foods... Where are the cons? I don't see any... It's not addictive and if you eat it you won't get cancer... all i know is one of those statements would not be true if we did this with nicotine....

    • 3 years ago
  • myndperception
    • 0
      myndperception  
    • To: MissG

      Your comment is so funny. The ignorance in your words are that current is a user controlled news site, the people who visit the site vote for what is important to them.

      The amount of times you see a piece of news about pot up there should make you realize how many people want this stupid drug war done.

      It's what we call an indicator.

    • 3 years ago
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • myndperception:

      No. I am not ignorant. I was being cheeky. Current used to be occupied by more global concerns. I have been a member since 2005. Content has changed. I accept that may be an indicator. But, I have a distaste in my mouth that what used to be an aggregate of reader selected news on a variety of topics seems narrow in scope. None of the change Obama promised has come fully to fruition. New world order still doesn't exist. There is a lot of other stuff out there to talk about.

      And by the way... I think that the popularity of these articles is also an indication of demographic shift on Current. Seems that previous participants were genuinely interested in sourcing that which was previously under-reported in mass media. Now, it just feels [sometimes] like self-interest. I am guilty of that, too. I am no saint.

    • 3 years ago
  • myndperception
  • loftyer
    • 0
      loftyer  
    • ok enough with tryin to make weed look like a weed in the yard..we all like it...but the shits bad for your health..its simple..."highly polluted air" inhaled isn't good for body..for all the environmentalists

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • loftyer
  • blaino
  • sk8r408
  • darkhorsejim
    • 0
      darkhorsejim  
    • We still don't even know how many health benefits can be derived from the sweet leaf ... just imagine the possibilities as the Feds slowly let states handle these matters more sanely. We're decriminalized in Massachusetts after a voter passed "reeferendum" in Nov. by a 2-1 margin. Things couldn't look more promising as research continues in the Boston areas massive medical community.

    • 3 years ago
  • kyackr
    • 0
      kyackr  
    • one thing is for certain .. marijuana prohibition has nothing to do with governmental concern for public health or safety ..
      it is a big issue.. and it is far from just a bunch of stoner's dreaming of smoking in peace that fuel this passion ..
      it just makes sense to fully study, research and utilize what cannabis medicines and hemp's industrial uses can offer society. that is should also be legal for adults to use recreationally in their home is so very obvious .

    • 3 years ago
  • cerealforeal
  • Joar
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • Has Current been taken over by a Cannabis lobby?

      Fucking a. Every time I look at the headlines the top three almost always has something about pot.

      If you want to smoke, smoke. BUT, there is SO much more of greater importance happening in the world, like, for instance:

      - The stimulus plan
      - Mobilization in Venezuela to keep term limits under control (and end Chavez's reign)
      - Energy discovery in Bolivia
      - Cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe

    • 3 years ago
  • SHAWN_RITTIMAN
  • Snellmen
  • simplecj
    • 0
      simplecj  
    • MissG:

      Ya get off your high horse and stop your bitching. If you don't like it, then don't read it. Obviously if it's making it to the top 10 enough people here voted it up. You alone are not the majority.

    • 3 years ago
  • cerealforeal
    • 0
      cerealforeal  
    • MissG:

      The people of Venezuela love Chavez. If that's what the people want, why do you want that to end? What if U.S. citizens wanted Obama to be in office for 12 years? Would it be acceptable for the EU or Russia to intervene? Why aren't you bringing up the fact that Putin is going to be put back in power?

      Don't let the mainstream media get to you like this anymore...

    • 3 years ago
  • atarikg
  • NillaBoo
    • 0
      NillaBoo  
    • MissG:

      Since we're bringing up more important issues, how about how the war on Cannabis alone accounts for billions of tax payer dollars. And quiet frankly I'm not okay with that.
      You bring up the Stimulus Plan as being more important, but have you considered the impact Marijuana could actually have on our economy? I for one am sick and tired of being shunned and outkast like I'm some sort of irresponsible teenager. Alot of people feel this way, that's why these issues keep being brought up. Until this issue is brought to full public attention and we actually have an open and honest discussion about it, it wont end.

      Peace!!

    • 3 years ago
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • MissG:

      Actually, cerealforeal, a majority the people of Venezuela don't love Chavez. That is why in a recent plebiscite, they voted widely against his constitutional addendum to remove term limitations. Also, since he has been in power, his policies of nationalization have actually stagnated any positive GDP growth for the region. The divides between the rich and the poor have deepened.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • MissG:

      The legalization of cannabis in all of it's forms is actually very relevant in America. You might think it's just about a bunch of potheads who want to get blazed, but if you do a little research I think you will find that the implications of hemp and medicinal marijuana is incredibly important!

    • 3 years ago
  • urbanwolf
    • 0
      urbanwolf  
    • MissG:

      MissG you still have yet to provide input on my statement. Wouldn't you agree that decriminalizing Cannabis, or even an out-right legalization, would help stimulate our economy? The billions spent on the War on Pot could be put directly into more progressive, forward thinking movements.

      I won't stand for these injustices any longer. I for one hope to see more encouraging reports like these.

      Peace

    • 3 years ago
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • MissG:

      I am for industrialized use, and medical use, and perhaps decriminalization on a state level eventualy leading towards a legalization measure at a federal level but I am not all consumed by it! This is a news agregate website, not a pot policy project!

    • 3 years ago
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • MissG:

      Holy hell! I come in peace! Just pointing out that I like to read non-pot related news in an earnest attempt to be a well-informed global citizen...

      DeliaTheArtist, I have no issue with people who smoke pot or who research the potential benefits of the plant. I don't deny that pot could someday produce substantial gains for a lot of the global south. That said, I work with democratization, representation and development. This may be one potential revenue stream in the making. But for now, there are immediate issues of human suffering that are underrepresented on Current. And in Washington. And in academia.

      urbanwolf, yes, I think that decriminalizing cannabis would bear a great impact. You are right - it would suck up less of the public purse. It would also to help de-marginalize people who involved themselves in illicit activities for their own livelihoods (I don't blame them. Never will). I am not anti-pot. I am not pro War on Pot. I just firmly believe that there are serious inequities in our system that won't be solved through its legalization... like education failure, dying energy fonts, racial inequality...

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • MissG:

      @MissG- If you feel that there are topics not getting enough attention on Current, post stories about them! But please understand that Current is a place where people choose what they want to see and hear about; the topics that get popular are the topics that are important to the community. You may not think that legalization of marijuana is a main issue in the world today, but obviously many people do.

      If this post is true and more research can be done, a cancer cure or treatment is certainly newsworthy no matter what else in the world is going on. You mentioned our economy as well, but the legalization of marijuana would save us millions if not billions of dollars a year pumped into the "war on drugs" as well as generate billions of dollars worth of hemp products, medicine and if legalized for recreation and sold similarly to alcohol or cigarettes, billions of dollars in taxes as well. It is NOT about "If you want to smoke, smoke"- People who smoke marijuana already do. This is about the possibilities that marijuana provides outside of just getting high.

      These other issues you mention are valid, but who ultimately decides what's "more important"? What is important to you might not be important to someone else and visa versa.

    • 3 years ago
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • MissG:

      Thanks, DeliaTheArtist. And as this is an open forum, we can agree to disagree. I am a huge proponent of participatory media. I understand that other people prioritize news differently than I do. That's cool. It's what keeps me engaged. Still, that doesn't mean that I don't get to call it into question. I am allowed to be critical and curious. After all, isn't one of the primary objectives of an open, participatory media format to create a platform for a plurality of voices? What would we learn if we all agreed. This is a place to generate discourse - from MULTIPLE sides of the arguments at hand.

      I'm done responding. I feel attacked for having a critical lens, which is really ridiculous considering the mission of this fabulous concept.

    • 3 years ago
  • cannabinoids
    • 0
      cannabinoids  
    • MissG:

      Well, lets see,

      The US has the highest prison population in the world and accounts for almost half of the 9.25 million people worldwide held in penal populations.
      http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:lzGQNLGCeZ0J:www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/icps/downloads/world-prison-pop-seventh.pdf+us+penal+population+world+population&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=safari

      So that seems like it registers on the scale of an international human rights issue… and since almost half of those people (49%) are in prison due to the war on drugs
      http://www.judicialaccountability.org/articles/prosecutormisconduct.htm

      and 12.7 of the total population are there specifically for marijuana related crimes
      http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7434

      that makes marijuana a significant part of that issue

      and if you think those are all big drug dealers with violent pasts you might want to take into account that in 2007 alone there were almost 40,000 arrests in which possession of under one ounce of marijuana was the most serious charge in just NYC.
      http://www.nyclu.org/files/MARIJUANA-ARREST-CRUSADE_Final.pdf

      And the fact that although 60% of white people have smoked at one point in there life and only 50% of blacks have smoked in their lifetime, 52% of those NYC arrests were of black people and only 15% were of white people (and blacks only made up 26% of the population, whereas whites made up 35%)
      http://www.nyclu.org/files/MARIJUANA-ARREST-CRUSADE_Final.pdf

      I think marijuana laws qualify again for a significant civil rights issue at least at the national level.

      Then there’s the fact that it costs about $23,000.00 per year to incarcerate each individual prisoner in the federal system (so, do the math, the cost of incarcerating that 12% that are in the system for marijuana offenses…)
      http://www.uscourts.gov/newsroom/prisoncost.html

      makes this a national budget issue

      and the fact that we spent 1.4 billion in the last year or so on the war on drugs in Mexico, which only led to an increase in drug exports and resulted in 5,700 deaths
      http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/10/081110fa_fact_guillermoprieto

      and makes marijuana part of an an international budget issue…

      so I think there’s a reason that at a place like currenttv were the content is chosen by the people, that the marijuana issue keeps coming up. The question is why doesn’t it make it to the national media?

    • 3 years ago
  • CreditFigaro
    • 0
      CreditFigaro  
    • MissG:

      I am a proud member of the stoner lobby and DONT SMOKE WEED!

      The economic implications of legalization are immense, and the relief of suffering that results in the saved money and hassle associated with not having hemp and prosecuting potheads is not quantifiable.

      In your defense, MissG, there are bigger issues out there.

      The biggest one, and, Ironically, the only one not mentioned here, is the health care industry.

      It is the largest expenditure in the US budget, and consumes 1/6th of our GDP.

      Single payer health care and a system run similarly to that in Great Britain and other health-care-progressive countries, would net a more than 1.2 trillion dollar ANNUAL net benefit.

      It would pay for all of the stimulus packages this year and last year in one year, balance the budget the year after, and eliminate our national debt in all in less than a decade.

      All of the above would happen WITHOUT a net change in our lifestyles or the standards of living.

      THAT is an issue that is worth bringing to the fore... but MJ is a bit more personal, which is probably why it gets so much traction.

      Unfortunately, fixing all the problems associated with how the government treats weed (even if you include the ripple effects) wouldn't even be a tenth of the net benefit of fixing the health care system.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • MissG:

      @MissI didn't mean for you to feel attacked, I'm just putting my 2 cents in. You should have a critical lens, I just think that the marijuana issue relevant and "importance" depends on a lot of factors.

      @occ-"Uh...DeliaTheArtist...are you implying that pot is more important than:

      - The stimulus plan
      - Mobilization in Venezuela to keep term limits under control (and end Chavez's reign)
      - Energy discovery in Bolivia
      - Cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe"

      Am I? I didn't think I was. I am implying that 1) importance in relative and 2) marijuana and the issues surrounding it's legality are completely significant to the world today and directly pertinent to at least one of the things you mentioned (the stimulus package/economy.)

      "The generation that wants what it wants, and doesn't give a damn about anything else in the world (see: slaughtered africans above)." I call bullshit on this. You can care about more than one thing at a time. People who are interested in marijuana legalization can care about other worldly issues. You see a variety of topics and stories on Current, most of them are political.

      "And its not a human rights issue. As much as you people want to toke up, getting access to a psychotropic substance is not your "inalienable right". Otherwise, we wouldn't need pharmacists, or drug enforcement."
      Again, this isn't about "wanting to toke up". You are simplifying it to dismiss it but you are missing the points everyone is making. For some people it IS a human rights issue that their state government says they can use marijuana as medicine only to have the federal government take that medicine away. If you do just the smallest amount of googling on hemp or medicinal marijuana, you will see that there are a lot of benefits to be gained from the legalization of marijuana and hemp much of which do NOT have to do with getting high.

    • 3 years ago
  • cannabinoids
    • 0
      cannabinoids  
    • MissG:

      sorry missyg, your post about feeling attacked, came while i was typing or i would have tempered my response.

      but in response to occhipij, i agree there are other issues out there, but this one happens to affect this particular age range. and it affects them in blatantly biased ways. as for violent videos, i could easily post horrific videos of the effects of the war on drugs in sinaloa, but i think its in poor taste to compare tragedies, jockeying for position. there are always a number of issues presented here on current.

      but perhaps you should update yourself on some of our local issues before criticizing people who hope to gain recognition for local issues,

      you say that "its not a human rights issue. As much as you people want to toke up, getting access to a psychotropic substance is not your "inalienable right". Otherwise, we wouldn't need pharmacists, or drug enforcement."

      why dont you check out why exactly we have the cannabis crazed drug enforcement. we've inherited this approach from the first guy to head the Bureau of Narcotics, Anslinger, who spearheaded the campaign against marijuana with statements like,

      "...the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races."

      and

      "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."

      I agree there are many problems in the world but take your own advice and dont turn your nose up at an issue just because its not your problem

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
    • 0
      Found_Avenue  
    • MissG:

      Quit your whining and POST something if it's important to you. Or go to another website if you have an issue with the content on this one. No one is holding a gun to your head and making you read articles about pot. Just.... um... DON'T CLICK ON SOMETHING IF IT DOESN'T INTEREST YOU.

      Lord, some people.

    • 3 years ago
  • liveBK
    • 0
      liveBK  
    • MissG:

      go miss G. your comments on the nature of current itself are ON POINT. I wish more people came at it with the sensible intellectual approach that you do, regardless of our opinions on particular things. I'm pretty sick of the thoughtless cowardly personal attacks from the other side of the internet. acknowledging diversity of opinion is the only way to even begin to approach "truth". keep on posting.

    • 3 years ago
  • sickinjersey
    • 0
      sickinjersey  
    • MissG:

      miss G i need weed.the prescriptions do not work. marinol does not work.i have aids.cancer and a failing liver.may i indulge in the relief that works best for me?that just sounds silly doesn't it? if there where a soldier down in the field and heroin brings him some relief is it ok for him to have it please? that just sounds crazy also.we can not save the world from itself we can only live in it and do our best to love one another. have you seen all this middle east crap? i am so sick of it.but the afghans make the best hash.how about that mike phelps character.

    • 3 years ago
  • blaino
    • 0
      blaino  
    • MissG:

      MissG-
      I would like you to think for one second of the implications the drug war has caused. The drug war is basically a war on pot since all the other drugs are only used by a very small almost insignificant number of people.

      Central and South America have been virtually destroyed because of the illegal drug trade, that only became illegal because of the drug war.

      Hundreds of thousands of non-violent offenders are thrown in prison, along with violent offenders, 80% for simple possesion of marijuana.

      The drug war is costing us billions of dollars every year, its giving the police more right and consequently taking our rights as a free people away.

      I would say that right now the war on marijuana and all the injustice and ignorance its caused is a major problem for the american people.

      Not only that but I notice one of your preferred topics says that you believe Hugo chavez is a problem. This irritates me, unless you are venezuelan stay out of their politics he was democratically elected by the venezuelan people, it is not Americas place to decide the future of venezuela that is the responsibility of the venezuelan people.

      The only reason Hugo chavez is a problem to America is because he hasnt sold out his country or his people to American corporations.

      Open your eyes.

    • 3 years ago
  • spoonieday
    • 0
      spoonieday  
    • MissG:

      current would be really boring if everyone focused on the same four or five issues, yes? if you want discourse, you're going to have to expect that people will answer you back and that it might not be in a way that you appreciate it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Godzilla555
  • sk8r408
    • 0
      sk8r408  
    • Godzilla555:

      I saw the same thing...

      "Study Finds No Link Between Marijuana Use And Lung Cancer"

      "Marijuana Smokers Face Rapid Lung Destruction -- As Much As 20 Years Ahead Of Tobacco Smokers"

      ...both on the same page

    • 3 years ago
  • Taiora
  • spoonieday
    • 0
      spoonieday  
    • Taiora:

      thinking that this will get weed legalized isn't the reason that people are happy about more evidence that weed fights cancer; people are generally happy hearing about anything that fights cancer. Also, it helps fight the the false information spread by drug warriors that marijuana is totally bad. Obviously if it can be used as a starting point for the synthesis for new drug compounds that can more effectively fight cancer than the heavy clubs that are radiation, chemo, and surgery, it is not the demon it has been portrayed to be.

    • 3 years ago
  • wade_wilson
  • galwayman
    • 0
      galwayman  
    • Pot has many medical uses and having survived 3 deadly cancers,and having gone through chemo using pot was the only way to deal with the side effects! Go after nacotics and legalize cannabis! Let people make up their own minds!

    • 3 years ago
  • Taiora
    • 0
      Taiora  
    • thats good but its not like people with cancer would be smoking it. They would put it in pill form so for all the stoners out there thinking this will make Pot legal it won't.

    • 3 years ago
  • quixotic12
    • 0
      quixotic12  
    • Taiora:

      I don't think most pot smokers are naive enough to think that yet ANOTHER study showing the benefits of marijuana will do anything significant to increase the likelihood of it getting legalized. These stories get pretty old pretty fast, but they're still vindicating.

    • 3 years ago
  • SredniVashtar
  • Found_Avenue
  • sickinjersey
  • blaino
    • 0
      blaino  
    • Taiora:

      They already have pot in pill form. Marinol look it up.

      Besides this isnt going to decide anything and we potheads understand this, however it does yet again prove that we are right.

    • 3 years ago
101 - 200 of 205
more from Community:

top videos