Community | February 18, 2009 | 71 comments

Obama commits 17,000 more US troops to Afghanistan

Image
bansheewail
Barack Obama has ordered 17,000 extra US troops be sent to Afghanistan, keeping a campaign pledge to bolster security in the country, which he said had not received the "strategic attention" it required.

The deployment, which will add nearly 50% to the 36,000 US troops already there, is a clear sign of the president's determination to rethink America's approach to the war.

The move will please military officials in Afghanistan, who have pleaded for more forces to battle an increasingly violent Taliban insurgency. Militant attacks have escalated in the last three years and insurgents now control wide sections of countryside.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Money,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Barack Obama 10 more
  3.     
    |

71 comments // Obama commits 17,000 more US troops to Afghanistan

  • Toni801
    • 0
      Toni801  
    • Obama is sending more of our men over there. While he is inviting the supposed victims of Gaza over here? What is he trying to do? If we get an influx of terrorists and all our men are in another country, it will make it that much easier for them to take over. I know that sounds extreme, but what is wrong with Obama? I tried telling people man, his middle name is Hussein for heavens sake. NO RESPECT FOR OBAMA.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Toni801:

      Well nothing personal "Toni801" but what you said doesn't sound as extreme as it sounds more paranoid delusional, ethnically bigoted (your reference to the name) and racist.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Those who still imagine and focus upon these apparent adversarial relationships between "Democrats" and "Republicans" are naive. They have been played and have bought right into the imaginary game. Get this: Republicans/Democrats=Republicrats. Same team. That contest is orchestrated as a dog and pony show to limit the choices to two individuals who will in any case take their marching orders from the exact same overlords. It is two halves of the same team playing an inter squad game. It is the offensive and defensive lines of the same team playing "against" one another to determine which will hold the position of captain for a season or two. Nothing more than a contrived competition with no substantial difference between the two who are vying for temporary leadership and no true change in direction. Another aspect of the "Bread and Circus" of this modern empire. The cycles are pretty well defined now as I noted in my previous post. Those who insist on seeing the RepublicRats oppositional fiasco as anything other than a distraction from the real political condition of the U.S. choose to go along with the fantasy and find themselves in a sad situation of being lied to and lead by the nose no matter who holds the "highest" office. Wake up and see the oppositional posturing of Dem vs Rep as the delusional smokescreen which it is or be lead, shorn and butchered like the sheep you choose to be. Grow up sportsfans, this is no game.

    • 3 years ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • Gee, where was the support for Bush when he went from invasion to incident free elections in five years. I guess there were no Taliban in Iraq. They must have respected the border and stayed next door. I guess it is different when a Dem president commits troops to battle. That must be inherently good whereas a Republican president doing the same thing is inherently bad. Now that the neo-Marxists are running things war, and the money we spend on it will be good
      It will be interesting to see how this one plays out. Time will tell. I had one son in Iraq in 03-04. He won't reup. Says he will not serve under Obama. Can't say as I blame him.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bahai144
  • Mobius2012
  • Hoax_Productions
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Per the definition of insanity, the one about mindless repetition is a clinical one not one from a dictionary and for that matter it's supported and contained within both dictionary definitions which "current89" cited earlier. The way I see it those who marched U.S. into the war beginning with Bush the Elder in 1991 and his cronies, all of those who followed Bush the Younger including Cheney the Marquis de DC, Rummey, Rice Cakes, and a host of other grotesques are all decidedly deranged, likely schizoid and very much certifiably insane.

      As for the second definition, it seems to me that they are most definitely of unsound mind, demonstrably lacking in understanding and very likely if put to the test would prove to be unqualified to assume the positions and relations they rose to and got free reign to perpetrate the evils they did upon the entire world.

      The bugger about this is that if truly tested they may be be found to be so far out of their minds that they would have to be exonerated of the crimes against humanity that they committed. Catch 22. Best leave that one alone.

      When speaking of the current President he is like those before him forced to do the dance his overlords have marked out in footprints on the ballroom he's walked into and that being the case has little choice but to do their bidding.

      Insanity defense notwithstanding this really isn't a case of repeating the same thing over it is actually a very painstakingly thought out plan being followed and carried out "somewhat" less than flawlessly (ask Zbigniew B.) yet carried out nonetheless. As Saddam Hussein would not play ball and could not be counted on to act as a western bulwark against Iran when the push through Afghanistan came to shove he had to be eliminated and replaced with a U.S. puppet who would be able to support a large number of American troops and allow for the exact operations that are beginning in transition from Iraq to Afghanistan right now. Had Saddam not gone off the res the way he did and played ball like he did for the 8 year war with Iran, he would most certainly still be very much in place and the U.S. would be well into it's war in Afghanistan having launched it with his full cooperation from Iraq. Quite likely had this path of the overarching plan played out the war with Iran may have been in full swing by now. As it is today this is just a few years delay. Bush did exactly what he was placed there to do. Obama is following in lock step where this and some other matters are concerned though he has the usual amount of leeway American Presidents get.

      If a major strike doesn't happen soon on American soil and President Obama gets to serve out his first term and, God willing even a second, he may well revive the flailing economy and build up a healthy surplus just like Bill on the Hill did which enabled Bush the Younger to have a ton of money to blow on a big adventure. So if a long term scenario plays out without a major strike on U.S. soil, in four to eight years there will be a very healthy surplus which the next one in the line of Bush's can blow on the intended war with Iran and then the End Game can begin. In either case it's all by design. Who's design one see's in it is a matter of ones affiliation.

    • 3 years ago
  • elementaljim
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • As I tried to make clear in my earlier post, this will end catastrophically for Afghanistan, the region, the U.S.A., and ultimately the entire world. Those who are so gung-ho for these wars should drop everything and sign up and go ASAP. The sooner the haters and warmongers rush to their end the sooner the human gene pool will be cleansed of these vile and bloodthirsty tendencies. Enjoy Armageddon.

    • 3 years ago
  • Rosenquartz
    • 0
      Rosenquartz  
    • I hope we're doing the right thing. Even if we do kill or capture Osama, couldn't someone else just take his place? Besides doesn't sending more troops to Afghanistan give the insurgency another recruiting tool?

    • 3 years ago
  • PirateSauce
  • WhiteNoise
  • rickm8
    • 0
      rickm8  
    • their different things,

      but a non-interventionist foreign policy is what we need

      **sits and waits to watch him crash and burn**

    • 3 years ago
  • Cynic2
  • JimboTheHippo
  • Bahai144
  • elementaljim
    • 0
      elementaljim  
    • These are not the responses I expected!
      Are you people NUTS or NEOCONS?

      WhiteNoise hit the nail on the head...
      "The universally accepted definition of INSANITY is to persist in the same behavior but expecting a different outcome."

      The public outcry that unfolded into Obama's election was Stop the Fukn Wars!
      This is another US occupation that has to stop. Leave Iraq and Afghanistan NOW you meatheads!

      NATO has troops from 20 plus countries in Afghanistan. We need to get out NOW and let them take the lead. Too many lives lost and damn near ruined our economy funding illegal occupations that only feeds the Military Industrial Complex.

      Wake the fuk up people!

      http://opinionsandreasons.blogspot.com/

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • elementaljim:

      Merrian Webster dictonary definiton of insanity

      1: a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia)

      2: such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility

      I really see no relation to the conflict in Afghanistan and insanity.

    • 3 years ago
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • elementaljim:

      "NATO has troops from 20 plus countries in Afghanistan. We need to get out NOW and let them take the lead."

      You do know that we are a part of NATO and that we pretty much lead NATO right? The other nations there want out more then we do lol

    • 3 years ago
  • elementaljim
    • 0
      elementaljim  
    • elementaljim:

      Yes we are a part of NATO but we are not the leader and we are not the World Police. Our presence as an occupying force only exacerbates the hostility towards the US and feeds the recruitment of hostile radical factions.
      The perception is somewhat different when an international 'peace keeping' force enters to help stabilize a situation than when an occupying force is building military bases in your back yard.

    • 3 years ago
  • Humdrum
    • 0
      Humdrum  
    • How many American soldiers/ foreign civilians died unnecessarily because of the lack of focus on Afghanistan, where we should have been focusing in the first place? Something is finally being done about it. This is very good news.

    • 3 years ago
  • holyshiite
    • 0
      holyshiite  
    • This is the same sort of surge that worked in Iraq. We are done there. Where is Pelosi/Reid on this? Are they threatening to cut off all funding again this time? Because Obama is doing the same thing Bush did you should be saying, "Damn, Bush was right!". At first I thought I hit a Fox News blog by mistake. But after reading further I realize that all of you educated peaceniks and liberals who are supporting this don't care about truth and giving credit where it is due. All you want is POWER. Political power in the hands of your boy is the goal, damn the means or the actions taken. Hypocrits? No. Evil? Yep.

    • 3 years ago
  • Finn_M
    • 0
      Finn_M  
    • holyshiite:

      While it bears one similarity (an increase in troop levels), this is not the same as the Iraq "surge". We already had plenty of troops in Iraq at the time and the situation there, while appearing similar, is vastly different. Rather than fighting decentralized local militias, as the surge was intended to do in Iraq, we are fighting a highly centralized insurgency in the form of the Taliban. It requires different tactics, and this isn't even addressing that - it's addressing the fact that we've been operating with too little manpower in Afghanistan for years.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Having been educated by Zbigniew Brzezinski and being firmly rooted in the movement of such benevolent organizations as the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations long term design for complete, hegemonic world domination, President Barak Obama is moving things forward exactly as intended to nail down the wall around Russia and the Middle Zone. Iran and Afghanistan remain as the only territories left to seize and this is what the U.S. policies are aimed at accomplishing. Once control of the Middle Zone is achieved then the end game will be initiated. The old proverb in regard to Afghanistan however, still looms prophetic in this endeavor which warns: "Afghanistan is the place where empires come to die". Obama and his overlords ignore this and place the entire world in peril.

    • 3 years ago
  • bjm1989
  • Bahai144
  • quixotic12
    • 0
      quixotic12  
    • Bahai144:

      What end game might that be, Bahai144? If you look at the history of that area, you will see that the last war the U.S. was involved in there was not properly ended, and because of this the NATO is back there, dealing with the mess the U.S. made there years ago. Thus, we must make sure to leave that area stable, or else we might end up trying to fix it again. In my opinion, this will take more than just military efforts, but also diplomatic and developmental efforts as well. Obama also stated his belief that more than military efforts are needed there just recently in an interview with CBC.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Bahai144:

      Whether or not you can see the end game depends on how you define "end". You're looking at the entire region and seeing that the "war" as you see it hasn't "ended" as you define an ending. That's missing the point altogether. You'll need to start thinking in a different way. Destabilization is both a means to an "end" and an "end" in itself. Regions in conflict are a goal which leads to another larger more sweeping goal. Are you with me? Most everything that is fed to the public through the media about causal events, objectives and strategies is complete BS. Proxy wars are an SOP and fomentation is a stratagem which is used in every case.

      Russia must be surrounded and boxed in with border conflict to create a constant threat to it in order to preoccupy it as well as to provide a buffer zone between it and the actual region of interest. Once Russia is walled in with NATO occupation along it's entire border (excluding that with China) the Western Powers will be free to crush all opposition within the Middle East zone and gain complete control of that oil rich region. After that Russia will be given choices which it may or may not accept and that will determine how the end game plays out. The goal in this is complete world domination. This is what's actually happening now. The central focal point of it is Jerusalem. It doesn't matter if people want to believe that the Bible is real or not it has been the goal of those who want global control throughout the last 3,000 years to sieze and hold Jerusalem and every one who's been able to do that has increasingly had a period of far reaching power. There is so much more to this than what this post puts forth but this, for better or for worse, and I believe ultimately though perhaps not in my lifetime it will be for the better, is the "game" that's afoot.

      As for China, it will be more likely to side with the west in any NATO/Russian war as it's more inclined to the west and has been so increasingly in recent years though it too is somewhat surrounded with both western allies and unstable relations much like Russia is now.

      At this time there is military warfare industrial warfare and monetary/economic warfare all going on at the same time, all for the same goal, and all being carried out by the same consortium of interest groups though not as tightly coordinated as a typical conspiracy theory would suggest at all. It is more random in it's progress and takes unexpected twists and turns and appears to be self adjusting as if controlled by a higher purpose just as nature itself develops along a path which though it may appear random always seems to find it climax expression when left to itself. Human global consciousness and civilization is following this exact same type of pattern and there is a reason, a will and a purpose that's behind the material veil which is commonly known in religious language as the plan of God.

      If you've made it this far here's a couple links if you care to see how far the rabbit hole goes. www.bupc.org and www.uhj.net

    • 3 years ago
  • Finn_M
    • 0
      Finn_M  
    • Supporting peace in Afghanistan while decrying an unjust war in Iraq is not hypocritical. The war in Afghanistan was justified and has been irresponsibly ignored in favor of our war of aggression.

      However, more soldiers aren't the solution. I may agree that current troop levels could be too small, but what is really needed is funding in the country to get their economy going and eliminate the influence of the Taliban. I'm surprised we haven't learned from Vietnam and Afghanistan #1 - what we need to be doing is supporting the Afghans economically as well as militarily. More troops aren't going to end the war, but they need to be the structure that supports our economic aid.

    • 3 years ago
  • kivol
  • Bahai144
  • Bren589
    • 0
      Bren589  
    • Not being a hypocrite Jan . But if they are going, there is nothing none of us can do., except wish them to come home safe and to wish them luck . I do not like war , But its not up to me as to who joins and who stays home. my son served I did not want him to. But I can not lead his life for him . He has to live his own and hope like hell he made good choices along the way. He has problems dealing now. so I am not a hypocrite at all

    • 3 years ago
  • JimboTheHippo
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • As much as I oppose war, Afghanistan cannot be abandoned. Before we invaded Iraq so hastily, and decreased troops levels in Afghanistan, progress was being made. Additionally, we can't abandon our allies to the slaughter, we've done that too much too often. We've done that in Iraq (with the Kurds), in Cuba , and in Vietnam, just to name a few.

      I pose a question to the naysayers of this conflict. What do you think will happen to the women who expressed their freedom, or the Afghans who sided with us during the invasion? Contemplate it. We involved ourselves based on irrational decisions. So, is it any better for us to withdraw based on an irrational, emotional reaction?

      FYI: My cousin was deployed to Iraq(Marine Corp) and he agrees we shouldn't be there, however he does believe we should stick with it in Afghanistan.

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • Well, come on generals, let's move fast;
      Your big chance has come at last.
      Gotta go out and get those turban heads —
      The only good Tali is the one who's dead
      And you know that peace can only be won
      When we've blown 'em all to kingdom come.

      Senior Military Officers Probed for Corruption in Iraq

      The New York Times reports federal authorities are now investigating senior US military officers on corruption charges connected to the $125 billion US-led reconstruction effort in Iraq. Last month, investigators subpoenaed the personal bank records of retired Army Colonel Anthony Bell, who was in charge of reconstruction contracting in Iraq in 2003 and 2004. In addition, investigators are examining the activities of Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Ronald Hirtle, who was a senior contracting officer in Baghdad in 2004. It is unclear how much reconstruction money went missing, but The Independent of London reports it could turn out to be the greatest fraud in US history, a bigger theft than Bernard Madoff’s $50 billion Ponzi scheme.

      And it's one, two, three,
      What are we fighting for ?
      Don't ask me, I don't give a damn,
      Next stop is Afghanistan;
      And it's five, six, seven,
      Open up the pearly gates,
      Well there ain't no time to wonder why
      Whoopee! we're all gonna die.

      Huh!

      Well, come on Wall Street, don't move slow,
      Why man, this is war au-go-go.
      There's plenty good money to be made
      By supplying the Army with the tools of the trade,
      Just hope and pray that if they drop the bomb,
      They don’t drop it on one of our own.

      "Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains.": Herbert Hoover - (1874-1964), 31st US President

      Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan Soared in 2008

      The United Nations has announced the number of civilians killed in Afghanistan last year jumped by nearly 40 percent as the violence in the country soared to its worst levels since 2001. There were over 2,100 reported civilian deaths. The UN said militants were to blame for 55 percent of the deaths, while US-led forces were responsible for nearly 40 percent. Meanwhile, 3,000 more US troops have arrived in Afghanistan, marking the first wave of an expected surge of US forces as part of President Obama’s plan to escalate the war in Afghanistan.

      The injury we do and the one we suffer are not weighed in the same scales: Aesop, Fables

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • Buddah_Funk
  • current89
  • kivol
    • 0
      kivol  
    • JanforGore:

      Separate how? What are the reasons we should be in Afghanistan? Are they justified?

      I don't know of any that make it so. I would like to hear some. Were the terrorist who attacked us on 9/11 from Afghanistan? I thought they were from Saudi Arabia.

      Will killing them solve the problem? Why not use diplomacy and ask why do you dislike america? Ask what are traditions that bother you have we Americans seem to have? How would you change our Country?

      Are the reasons they then give justified? If not, what is the underlying statement behind their request?

      How can we get the public of Afghanistan to join our side but protect their rights, while protecting ours.

      I still see this war as for economic gain.

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • JanforGore:

      @ Jivol

      Correct, the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia(most of them), however they trained in Afghanistan and were harbored by the Taliban government in Afghanistan. At this point the original intent of the invasion is inconsequential. Additionally, when you invade a nation, depose the despots and damage the infrastructure of said country, you must STABILIZE IT. In other words "You break it, you buy it."

    • 3 years ago
  • JimboTheHippo
    • 0
      JimboTheHippo  
    • JanforGore:

      Iraq is a mess.. It was either leave Suddam in power to oppress and kill his people or intervene and now if we leave it would be anarchy. Taliban supports terrorists so that was an easy call

    • 3 years ago
  • Bahai144
  • clownpuncher
  • nothingsreal
  • thejesse2011
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • Be the first one on your block
      To have your boy come home in a box !

      Yeah, come on all of you, big strong men,
      Uncle Sam needs your help again.
      He's got himself in a terrible jam
      Way down yonder in Afghanistan
      So put down your books and pick up a gun,
      We're gonna have a whole lotta fun.

      And it's one, two, three,
      What are we fighting for ?
      Don't ask me, I don't give a damn,
      Next stop is Afghanistan;
      And it's five, six, seven,
      Open up the pearly gates,
      Well there ain't no time to wonder why,
      Whoopee! we're all gonna die.

      Well, come on mothers throughout the land,
      Pack your boys off to Afghanistan.
      Come on fathers, don't hesitate,
      Send 'em off before it's too late.
      Be the first one on your block
      To have your boy come home in a box.

      And it's one, two, three
      What are we fighting for ?
      Don't ask me, I don't give a damn,
      Next stop is Afghanistan.
      And it's five, six, seven,
      Open up the pearly gates,
      Well there ain't no time to wonder why,
      Whoopee! we're all gonna die.

      "I-Feel-Like-I'm-Fixin'-To-Die" -Country Joe

      http://antiwar.com

    • 3 years ago
  • charfman
  • WhiteNoise
  • unashamed_muse
    • 0
      unashamed_muse  
    • Having 1 son thinking about enlisting and another who can enlist in about 2 years, the entire prospect of this war growing scares the shit out of me!

    • 3 years ago
  • Bren589
  • unashamed_muse
  • TeejK
  • unashamed_muse
  • Bren589
    • 0
      Bren589  
    • Good luck Ladies and Gents . I hope you come through this war winning . I hope you come home safe. May god be with you all .

    • 3 years ago
  • Buddah_Funk
    • 0
      Buddah_Funk  
    • Things seem to be headed in the right direction. Although sending 17,000 troops to Afghanistan is going to help efforts there, more troops are still needed. There is still a lot of work that needs to be done on that front.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
  • bansheewail
    • 0
      bansheewail  
    • jh64487:

      By "we" you mean the 19 year old young man who posted just above you amd all of his buddies, right? Or are you in the service over there, too.(no sarcasm, true interest) Or were you refering to "we" the taxpayer dollars? haha (total sarcasm)

    • 3 years ago
  • dmass5
    • 0
      dmass5  
    • this is great news

      today, almost 50 troops arrived from other bases and it is already a relief that we have more people.

      The more we have the better we can keep the peace thus lowering the chances of soldiers dieing.

    • 3 years ago
  • bansheewail
  • clownpuncher
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • The universally accepted definition of INSANITY is to persist in the same behavior but expecting a different outcome.

      ”The civilized have created the wretched, quite coldly and deliberately, and do not intend to change the status quo; are responsible for their slaughter and enslavement; rain down bombs on defenseless children whenever and wherever they decide that their "vital interests" are menaced, and think nothing of torturing a man to death: these people are not to be taken seriously when they speak of the "sanctity" of human life, or the "conscience" of the civilized world” - James Baldwin

      Meanwhile...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PTO4BmG4zA&feature=channel_page

      "The age of warrior kings and of warrior presidents has passed. The nuclear age calls for a different kind of leadership....a leadership of intellect, judgment, tolerance and rationality, a leadership committed to human values, to world peace, and to the improvement of the human condition. The attributes upon which we must draw are the human attributes of compassion and common sense, of intellect and creative imagination, and of empathy and understanding between cultures." - William Fulbright

      CITIZENS 2.0 : PLAYERS NOT CHEERLEADERS !

      STOP JUDGING POLITICIANS ON WHAT THEY SAY BUT ON WHAT THEY DO !

      "The essence of oligarchical rule is not father-to-son inheritance, but the persistence of a certain world-view and a certain way of life ... A ruling group is a ruling group so long as it can nominate its successors... Who wields power is not important, provided that the hierarchical structure remains always the same.": George Orwell, 1984

      WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY & IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    • 3 years ago
  • thejesse2011
  • Bahai144
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • WhiteNoise:

      Frankly, the situation has me at more than a bit of a loss...Obama inherited both conflicts. Ordering the troops to simply throw down their weapons and leave the field might even make a good script for a Bollywood movie, but of course only a simpleton would actually advocate such a course of action. If you were in Obama's shoes (and I know from your previous posts that you know he does not have the powers of an emperor as about a good third of the people on this site seem to believe [e.g. Why doesn't Obama just [insert patently unconstitutional action here]...um, because that is either Congress' job or the Supreme Court would strike it down]).

      OK, that last paragraph got a little twisted around, so I am letting it float on its own and hopefully you can DERIVE some meaning from it (if only a brief lesson on how NOT to write persuasive prose). But I THINK you see where I am going...your citations are lovely, but I am not sure they answer the ultimate question. Yes, war is bad. Very, very bad. Tarzan ask: how we get from bad place to good place (I think I have finally found "my voice!" I'll alert the media...)?

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • WhiteNoise:

      Your answer is at the end of this clip...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PTO4BmG4zA&feature=channel_page

      ...and at the beginning of this one...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmhL8bjL9vc&feature=channel

      You are right thought that empire building & being reduced to acting as mercenary for the Zionist or protecting drug lords & brutal puppet regimes is not a situation that will resolve over night...especially when the failure of the 4th estate is so complete.

      Our complacency seems to have no limit indeed !

      Ignorance is the downfall of all cultures and we are about to hit bottom.

      "Since world war two we've managed to create history's first truly global empire. This has been done by the corporatocracy, which are a few men and women who run our major corporations and in doing so also run the U.S. government and many other governments around the world." John Perkins, author of ' Confessions of an Economic Hit Man' http://www.johnperkins.org/

      “When will the American people actually vote to give to the world more than bombs and missiles, sweatshops, dubious science, frankenfood, poverty and misery?” - Cynthia McKinney

    • 3 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • WhiteNoise:

      Hmmmmm. I take your points and even agree in part with the McKinney citation at the end. But at least in my opinion an argument loses a little steam if does not at least "tip its hat" to its own limitations. America is not ONLY about the things McKinney lists. I am quite certain that you are aware of just as many truly wonderful people doing truly wonderful things -- especially in their local communities -- in this country. Collectively, we have made some grave errors just in the past half-century and collectively we are pretty close to the top of the mountain in terms of sheer arrogance (though we do not, by any means, have a monopoly on THAT commodity...as I let my head travel over a map of the world, it is far easier to pick out the few governments that DON'T tend to be arrogant than the mass that do. At the same time, most of the Americans I know are kind, generous, curious and hard-working people. Most just want to carve out a life and feed and educate their kids (and send 10 grand to that TV preacher). I guess I am just saying that I hope we can retain the good while addressing the bad.

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • WhiteNoise:

      Indeed but just as a battered wife that always goes back to her torturer; there is only so much help & respect one can afford to a lost cause...

      Stupidity has a certain charm, ignorance does not. - Frank Zappa

      If people insist on living & thinking as if we still are in the middle-ages, WTF is a 21th century man is to do ?

      Yuk-yuking watching RELIGULOUS will make it for a few hours top ;)
      http://lionsgate.com/religulous/

      Then one has to use the best tool humanity has yet to give itself to understand the universe...drum roll,,, The Scientific Method & systematicly replace faith with facts.

      Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over. -Frank Zappa

      Same goes with politics. If you keep taking the pabulum big media keeps feeding you for facts...

      WTF can I do but what I'm doing right here right now , putting my finger in the whole of this huge wall of indifference, complacency & misplaced thrust ?

      Ignorance is the downfall of all cultures and we are about to hit bottom.

      "Kid's heads are filled with so many nonfacts that when they get out of school they're totally unprepared to do anything. They can't read, they can't write, they can't think. Talk about child abuse. The school system as a whole qualifies. Go to the library and educate yourself if you've got any guts... " - Frank Zappa

      Meanwhile...

      "We are watching a poorly staged rendition of Wag the Dog , interpreted for the morbidly stupid and performed by the criminally insane." - Jules Carlysle

    • 3 years ago
  • bansheewail
    • 0
      bansheewail  
    • It's about time! 17,000 is a start, but nowhere near enough to get the job done.

      Now that Iraq is on the back burner, where it should have been in the first place, we can focus on finding and eliminating the threat of Islamic Fundamentalism in the region. It's nice to see our Commander and Chief keeping his campaign promises so soon. Obama is a man of his word.

      Stay sharp, Dale.

      Bansheewail, over and out.

    • 3 years ago
  • clownpuncher
  • Mobius2012
more from Community:

top videos