CA Hears Gay Marriage Arguments

VSiskos
The California Supreme Court hears arguments for and against Prop. 8, the proposition which banned same-sex marriage.
  1. groups:
    Community,   On Current TV,   News Current,   Current News,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News On Current TV News Current
  3. credits:
    VSiskos Editor, VSiskos Producer
  4.     
    |
    Embed video:
    |

31 comments // CA Hears Gay Marriage Arguments // Video

  • wenderz26
    • 0
      wenderz26  
    • Next, they'll pass laws saying no athiest can live within 10 miles of a church, overwieght people aren't allowed to eat but once per day, blonds can not attend college, only people with blue eyes are allowed to have children. Yes it sounds absolutely rediculous, but no more so than saying only a man and a woman can get married.

    • 3 years ago
  • Scarborian
    • 0
      Scarborian  
    • I think the good guys were caught off-guard by the slick and deceptive PR campaign mounted by proponents of Proposition 8. That won't happen next time.

      If same-sex marriages are outlawed in California, it will only be for as long as it takes for the next proposition to restore equal rights to all citizens.

    • 3 years ago
  • estee_arie
    • 0
      estee_arie  
    • THIS IS SO PLAYED OUT - WE ALL SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET MARRIED- ITS SO RIDICULOUS- I FEEL LIKE THEY PLAY THE GAY CARD EVERY TIME THERE'S A REAL CRISIS- LIKE A FREAKING DEPRESSION- I NEED A BAIL OUT HOW BOUT YOU GUYS- I MEAN PLEASE- STOP FALLING FOR THE GAY CARD- LOOK @ REAL ISSUES OUR COUNTRY HAS- JOHN AND JOHN OR CARRIE AND KATHY - OR ANY HUMAN SHOULD BE ABLE TO MARRY ANOTHER- THIS IS A RELIC OF AN ARGUMENT, WE HAVE REAL PROBLEMS IN AMERICA - NOT WHO LOVES WHO. EVERTIME THOUGH THEY PULL THE GAY CARD TO MAKE U LOOK AWAY FROM REAL ISSUES- STOP FALLING FOR IT PEOPLE! MUCH LOVE.

    • 3 years ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • Well, looks like majority ruled in Prop 8.

      it was an amendment to California's Constitution to keep marriage between a man and a woman. Personally, i really don't care.

      In the eyes of the majority of Californian voters, gay marriage was wrong and so it was amended. It's how things go, a democracy at it's best, eh?

      This is good, these decisions should be up to the states and not the federal government. States are to be sovereign.

      Why is this so important ? Gays got along fine before, why are things different now?

      Is this a right to marry or a right to have the state tell you that you are a married couple. I believe that love between two people shouldn't need marriage it should be unconditional if you really love them.

      All that happened was the majority ruling and an amendment was put in place to support the majorities decision. If you don't like American democracy then why not just leave.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      Uh no, this is a Democratic Republic, not some tyranny of the majority "let's make Socrates drink hemlock because he scares me" democracy.

      We have a constitution for a reason, you don't write shit like this into gently. Plus, it makes no sense that 50% + 1 person can do whatever the fuck they want while elected representatives need a 2/3's majority.

      The basis of our country is that we guarantee freedom for everyone, not ensure rights to one privileged group and bullshit for everyone else.

      I mean literally, by your logic, we should have overturned the civil rights act and brown vs. board of education or any other civil rights legislature. More people were against than for it at the time!

      You know what you're saying is wrong and furthermore, you don't even care about this issue. So why bother leaving a comment at all?

      It MATTERS to gay people, both symbolically and literally. This is an affirmation by the state of their existence and a guarantee to legal rights they clearly deserve and that everyone else already has.

    • 3 years ago
  • snanders
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      "Gays got along fine before, why are things different now?" If by "got along fine" you mean got discriminated against, beaten, killed and denied civil rights for being gay...oh wait, that still happens now. So I guess things aren't very different, are they?

      "I believe that love between two people shouldn't need marriage it should be unconditional if you really love them." They don't need it, but that's up to the couple to CHOOSE. The problem is, gay people don't have the choice at all.

    • 3 years ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      @saladin I am truly sorry for not saying that we live in Democratic Republic. I love our country and the Constitution means a lot to me.

      I was misguided in some of the things i said, sorry for the inconvenience.

    • 3 years ago
  • artemis6
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • It's only a matter of time until we see gay marriage.

      I see enough logical arguments as well as emotional sentiments to explain why it is necessary.

      I feel lost at having to explain this another way. When will people understand? What words need to be used to reach those that oppose this simple matter of modern American civil rights?

    • 3 years ago
  • AreOh
    • 0
      AreOh  
    • The equation is quite simple. If we are a nation that truly believes in the equality that our Constitution demands for all its citizens under the flag of the red white and blue, this needs to be struck down. Period. Equal rights is not a something that should be decided by popular vote.

    • 3 years ago
  • mahdosad
    • 0
      mahdosad  
    • AreOh:

      with all repect , america was not built on equality , the situation we have right now in country,(madaffs and so many other theives) are being prised by what they are doing , tell me something, in a normal situation in usa
      millions of people invest and what they get ( i said in normal usa not now) is a few dollar interest every month
      what ceo's get is millions of dollars from yours and my money , so you see the sistem is not a good sistem to begin with, there was no equalities at the first place
      madaff and the others are the products of this sistem
      if you want a real change and some equalities we must chang the whole sistem.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • Image
    • A mistake was made in California. The passage of proposition 8, a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being only between a man and a woman, was a mistake. The California state supreme court now has a chance to correct that mistake. Let us hope they do the right thing.
      Civil rights, human rights, gay rights, should not be put up for a vote. The minority must be protected from the tyranny of the majority. It is time to put away the hatred and bigotry. The discrimination has gone on too long. Our religious institutions are largely to blame, for it is from these institutions the bigotry and hatred comes.
      Gay rights are civil rights are human rights. Discrimination is always wrong. In the future, those who oppose gay marriage now, will appear as ignorant and foolish as those who opposed interracial marriage fifty years ago.
      Make no mistake, if you oppose gay marriage you stand on the side of ignorance and hate; you stand in darkness and shame.
      Indeed, it is only a matter of time. Prop 8 passed with only the slightest majority. Studies show the proposition passed based on the votes of the old and the uneducated. The old will die. The uneducated can be enlightened. Very soon the majority will recognize what many Americans recognized long ago: homophobia is wrong.

    • 3 years ago
  • FallenMorgan
  • evertre
    • 0
      evertre  
    • these people are living a second class lifestyle. they do not deserve to be married in the eyes of MY God. this is a sick, sad reminder of the times we are currently in. to shame.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • AreOh
    • 0
      AreOh  
    • evertre:

      God has nothing to do with equal rights or more specifically your views on sexual orientation. I respect that your views on same sex marriage and will defend to the pain your right to express them. But you are wrong if you feel this is a criteria to determine who receives rights that are supposed to be afforded to all tax paying citizens in our union. Anything less is simply unconstitutional and un-American.

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • evertre:

      First, your probably a Christian, right? So lets see what else "your god" endorses;

      Slavery;

      The Old Testament “As for your male and female slaves whom you have: you may buy slaves from among nations that are round about you”- Leviticus 25:44-46 .

      The New Testament does as well. Ephesians 6:5 proclaims “Slaves be obedient to those who are your earthly masters, with fear and trembling in singleness of heart, as to Christ…” Similar quotes regarding slavery can be found in Exodus 21:7-11 and 1 Timothy 6:1-4.

      General violence,

      “If a man not abide in me, he is cast forth as a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire and burned”-John 15:6.

      "Do not think that I have come to bring peace upon the earth. I have come to bring not peace but the sword."-Matthew 10: 34-36

      "Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels" (Matthew 25:41)

      “God deems it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you…when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance upon those who do not know God…"-2 Thessalonians 1:6-9 says

      Wow, you have some really twisted morals.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • evertre:

      "they do not deserve to be married in the eyes of MY God."
      That's why they won't be married in YOUR church, under YOUR god's approval. Understand that the American government and YOUR god should have nothing to do with one another.

    • 3 years ago
  • snanders
    • 0
      snanders  
    • evertre:

      "these people" have proven to be just as upstanding citizens and parents as heterosexuals if not more so. Any claim otherwise is the result of anti-gay propaganda and fear-based tactics that the Catholic church had utilized to scare people into voting for prop 8. "Teacher's will be forced to teach your children about gay marriage!!" O_O

      ...and God doesn't belong to you prick. in fact, if you wanted to do a population count, I'd say God belongs to the Muslims.

    • 3 years ago
  • snanders
    • 0
      snanders  
    • evertre:

      Also, you views reflect the views of the 18th century where whites saw other "races" (China and India in this example) as inferior no matter how advanced their architecture, art, education and society were because... they weren't Christian.

      So I think your a good example of why being homophobic or "homonauceous" (whatever, it's the same) is equivalent to being racist. Good for you! now please evolve.

    • 3 years ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • evertre:

      Dude, you just had to open your mouth.

      I am a Christian as well and have had my share or ridicule among the people or Current.

      Politically, i am for equal rights.

      Religiously, i want my kids to grow up in God.

    • 3 years ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • evertre:

      Well, looks like majority ruled in Prop 8.

      it was an amendment to California's Constitution to keep marriage between a man and a woman. Personally, i really don't care.

      In the eyes of the majority of Californian voters, gay marriage was wrong and so it was amended. It's how things go, a democracy at it's best, eh?

      This is good, these decisions should be up to the states and not the federal government. States are to be sovereign.

      Why is this so important now? Gays got along fine before, why are things different now?

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • evertre:

      Uh no, this is a Democratic Republic, not some tyranny of the majority "let's make Socrates drink hemlock because he scares me" democracy.

      We have a constitution for a reason, you don't write shit like this into gently. Plus, it makes no sense that 50% + 1 person can do whatever the fuck they want while elected representatives need a 2/3's majority.

      The basis of our country is that we guarantee freedom for everyone, not ensure rights to one privileged group and bullshit for everyone else.

      I mean literally, by your logic, we should have overturned the civil rights act and brown vs. board of education or any other civil rights legislature. More people were against than for it at the time!

      You know what you're saying is wrong and furthermore, you don't even care about this issue. So why bother leaving a comment at all?

      It MATTERS to gay people, both symbolically and literally. This is an affirmation by the state of their existence and a guarantee to legal rights they clearly deserve and that everyone else already has.

    • 3 years ago
  • Varex_Sythe
  • mindcontrol
  • mahdosad
    • 0
      mahdosad  
    • current89 is right , and i still don't underestand why some are so against gay marriage , what do i care if
      the partners are 2 men or 2 women or a man and a woman, as long as law protect all of them the same and equal , and the same law covers everybody , it is not right
      to put minority under repression ,beacuse of their sex orientation.

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • I've said it before and I'll say it again. This is one of the few issues I don't think people should compromise on. Prop. 8 and other laws like it, are blatant violations of our Constitution .It's not only a blatant violation of the 9th and 14th amendments, but it also is against the spirit of the Constitution of the United States.

      Additionally, no majority should be able to repress the rights of a minority. That is one of the many principles this country was founded on and we should not abandon it, nor should we take it for granted. This entire issue shows why we are a Representative-Republic and not a direct-democracy.

      I think it would be prudent to quote the founding fathers...

      "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine."-Thomas Jefferson

      "In democracies, the great danger is, that the majority may not sufficiently respect the rights of the minority."-James Madison

    • 3 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • kushan
  • MissG
    • 0
      MissG  
    • Just say no to second class citizenship. Amending legislation should not remove civil liberties - it should expand on them.

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:

top videos