Surviving 2012 and Planet X - Part 1 of 5: The Threat

As it stands right now only a handful of people relative to the entire population of the planet are actually awake to the reality of our collective circumstance. The events suggested in these videos and all the ancient myths, legends, prophecies etc., when they come to bear upon humanity, will not be the cause of them awakening, that has to take place prior to these eventualities as by the time they become a reality waking up will not bring change just the realization that the Prophets were right and "oh shit". Those who don't awaken and take appropriate action before these events will only be fuel for the fire both figuratively and literally.

If you didn't finish the series then you completely missed the point of them. Exactly what gave you reason to believe it was specifically religious in any way? Because it referenced some ancient texts? You really can't make an informed assessment of something you haven't been fully informed of. You should follow it through to the end before passing your judgment.

actually i think this happens once a year.

Your loss.

akamaial writes,

"...I was going to live hard and die young.."

You remind me of my favorite luscious troubador\philosopher\saint (AKA "Blondie") who proposed the following admonition to yesterdays' youth -

"Die young. Stay pretty."

I didn't.

"Shall we have another beer and slobber through another year or wise up children?"

Bartender, make that 4 beers now that Avery and Bahaii have joined into the fray...BWAHAHAHAHA

Sorry boys but I don't drink and instead choose the latter of the two options given in my quote. You would be wise to follow my lead.

Bahai144, lighten up dude, as foghorn leghorn says....It's a joke son, just a joke....

Abraham99,

Let use two threads for this ...

Velikovsky? A psychiatrist by trade, a colleague of Freud and Jung, an ardent popularizer of theology as a pre-scientific memory vault.

Along the way he struck a lot of hornet's nests. For the sin of trying to rationalize the apparent irrationality of pre-scientific thought – something that Velikovsky as a psychiatrist was eminently qualified to attempt – old Immanuel was despised and ridiculed. He was treading on other specialist's turf.

It was not his last outrage but one of several.

Velikovsky gave a lecture on Freud's “Moses and Monotheism” – where he claimed that glorious One Godism was a bureaucratic ruse devised simply to allow Akhnaton to wed his mom. Worse, the real “Oedipus” was none other than Amenhotep IV, AKA Akhnaton. Freud, present during the lecture, is reported to have fainted.

http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/vel/oedipus.htm

Carl Sagan, today regarded as a super-nice, ultra-cautious, virtual scientific Saint, penned a series of defamatory and virulent attacks condemning Velikovski for two "absurd" theories.

http://www.the7thfire.com/education/earth_changes.htm

Here's what the theories looked like.

"Immanuel Velikovsky in his 1950's book Worlds in Collision proposes that many myths and traditions of ancient peoples and cultures are based on actual events: worldwide global catastrophes of a celestial origin, which had a profound effect on the lives, beliefs and writings of early mankind."

"In Apri1, 1940, Velikovsky was first struck by the idea that a great natural catastrophe had taken place at the time of the Israelites' Exodus from Egypt - a time when plagues occurred, the Sea of Passage parted, Mt. Sinai erupted, and the pillar of cloud and fire moved in the sky. Velikovsky wondered: Does any Egyptian record of a similar catastrophe exist? He found the answer in an obscure papyrus stored in Leiden, Holland - the lamentations of an Egyptian sage, Ipuwer. The Ipuwer Papyrus, Velikovsky became convinced, parallels the Book of Exodus, describing the Eastern history, taking this catastrophe - which brought the downfall of the Egyptian Middle Kingdom- as a starting point from which to synchronize the histories of Egypt and Israel. He titled his work Ages in Chaos."

"The cause of the catastrophe terminating the Middle Kingdom remained unexplained. One afternoon in October, 1940, Velikovsky noticed an important fact: the Book of Joshua describes a destructive shower of meteorites occurring before the sun "stood still," in the sky. Could this be a coincidence, or were the ancients recording a cosmic disturbance that must have shaken the entire Earth and might have been related to the upheavals approximately 50 years earlier during the Exodus? A survey of other sources around the world convinced Velikovsky that a global cataclysm had indeed overtaken the Earth, and that Venus played a decisive role in that cataclysm. For 10 years he researched and wrote Ages in Chaos and Worlds in Collision. He had by now taken up permanent residence in the United States."

[more below]

[continued]

The nerve! What monstrous cheek!

Every True Scientist, meaning in orthodox lock-step with Carl Sagan, knew that the odds of big things in space hitting each other was all but impossible. The idea that the old religions contained an obscured memory of past astronomical events especially reduced to the logic of "We Were Bad so God Did It!" was just preposterous. That continents “moved” encouraged Carl to describe Velikovsky's ideas as "heresy."

Now we are told this -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_moon#Origin_and_geologic_evolution

"Giant Impact hypothesis

The prevailing hypothesis today is that the Earth–Moon system formed as a result of a giant impact. A Mars-sized body (labelled "Theia") is believed to have hit the proto-Earth, blasting sufficient material into orbit around the proto-Earth to form the Moon through accretion.[6] As accretion is the process by which all planetary bodies are believed to have formed, giant impacts are thought to have affected most if not all planets. Computer simulations modelling a giant impact are consistent with measurements of the angular momentum of the Earth–Moon system, as well as the small size of the lunar core.[44] Unresolved questions regarding this theory concern the determination of the relative sizes of the proto-Earth and Theia and of how much material from these two bodies formed the Moon."

Throughout his works Velikovsky cited Alfred Wegener. An obscure nobody dead by 1930 who as it turned out was the spark that led to Plate Tectonics theory, and still more shrill theoretical mudslinging for half a century

http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/developing.html

http://www.hartrao.ac.za/geodesy/tectonics.html

http://www.grazian-archive.com/quantavolution/QuantaHTML/alphabetic/_quantavol_a...

From what I've seen here "akamail" it's quite impossible for you to know anything as your posts consistently illustrate. I've given you a wealth of resources to explore, now run off and find a nice quiet place and begin your education.

Bahai144, I do know that I have much to learn each and every day, and I strive to do so, particularly in areas that I feel of are of interest or feel that impacts my life....you, on the other hand are quite convinced that one should capitulate to your understanding of "truth and enlightenment" or therefore suffer life without merit or understanding.

Please be so kind as to cease defining the measure of my intelligence and understanding in comparison to your own....which I find offensive, just because I choose to comment or reflect a thought here rather than bloviate.

Well good for you.