Community | March 11, 2009 | 13 comments

Judge rejects Chevron's motion to delay 27 billion Ecuador environmental trial

Image
JanforGore
The Amazon Defense Coalition reports that oil is still visible to the naked eye in places where Chevron claimed it was remediated. Their plea to delay the trial was denied. I can only hope the next step is to see them pay, although no amount of money can make up for the environmental devastation they have caused and the lives they have ruined. However, this is good news to go forward with.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Earth and Science
  2. tags:
    News Green Earth and Science Environment 12 more
  3.     
    |

13 comments // Judge rejects Chevron's motion to delay 27 billion Ecuador environmental trial

  • Bren589
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • The Law should be changed . Companies era responsible and should be held accountable . Let us make an example of this one .....

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Yes, but now with climate change and seeing the environmental and social consequences of such a theory and practice, I think (and hope) that we will see a shift back to where ethical business practices will be what brings the most profit as more people stand up for them. It is only morally right that those who respect the Earth deserve the benefits of their labor and care. We must now turn the fear on them.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Image
    • Removing moral responsibility from Corporations happened to a great extent under Reagan and Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize Winning Economist. He is the one who said that Corporation s are artificial people with artificial responsibilities, to say that a Corporation has a social responsibility is not accurate. The only responsibility a Corporation has is to it's stock holders.

      Of course Corporations ate this up and since then they have run amok. Friedman took the lid off Pandora's box.

      I wrote a scathing essay on business ethics and the culture of fear that they have generated around this subject of "no moral responsibility".

    • 3 years ago
  • vladbox
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • I'll be checking everyday to see how it progresses. This hopefully will open the door to more accountability on the part of many corporations that have destroyed the environment of this beautiful world and the peoples who inhabit it. This notion that corporate entities should be absolved of moral responsibility is unadulturated BS.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
  • cerealforeal
    • 0
      cerealforeal  
    • Good. And can you believe the commercials that Exxon is creating? Trying to show the world that they are green and some bullshit. Yeah, but they'll never show how they destroyed the Amazon because they valued profit over mother earth.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • galwayman
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • From the article:

      As part of a last-ditch effort to delay a final decision in the world’s largest environmental trial, additional soil testing demanded by Chevron backfired Tuesday when waste pits in Ecuador’s Amazon jungle that the company claimed to have “cleaned” a decade ago revealed large amounts of oil clearly visible to the naked eye.

      The final series of tests of Chevron oil production sites, scheduled to be completed by the end of March, will clear the way for a court decision on a $27 billion damages claim against the company, said Julio Prieto, a lawyer for the 30,000 Amazon residents who have sued the oil giant over what experts believe is the worst oil-related contamination on the planet.

      In what has become a common delay tactic in the epic 15-year legal battle, Chevron lawyer Adolfo Callejas had demanded for months that he be allowed to take soil samples at eight additional oil production sites even though the evidentiary phase of the case had been all but completed two years ago. The court scheduled the tests for Tuesday, but Callejas requested a postponement of the very tests he had called for just minutes before they were to be conducted even though court officials and technical experts had traveled under armed guard for hours to reach the sites deep in the jungle.

      The court denied the motion and ordered the tests to proceed at well sites Auca 17 and 19, leading to a dramatic and embarrassing moment for Chevron.

      With Callejas and several colleagues watching, a court-appointed technical expert, Marcelo Munoz, lifted soil samples from waste pits that Texaco reportedly had “remediated”. Oil sludge was clearly visible to the naked eye in waste pits that Texaco had certified to Ecuador’s government as “cleaned” in the mid 1990s.

      Since 2004, the court has inspected 94 former Chevron oil production facilities in the rainforest and found extensive toxic contamination at 100% of the sites, according to a 4,000-page report by a court-appointed expert and a team of 14 independent scientists released last year. That report found the oil giant could be liable for up to $27 billion in damages for creating what experts believe is the worst oil-related catastrophe on the planet, covering an area the size of Rhode Island.

      The lawsuit seeks damages for the dumping of more than 18 billion gallons of toxic waste into Amazon waterways and the clean-up of 916 waste pits gouged out of the jungle floor. The pollution occurred between 1964 to 1992, when Texaco operated a large oil concession in the area, but the expert found it is still leaching toxins into soils and groundwater in an area where tens of thousands of people live.

      Chevron bought Texaco in 2001 and will bear any liability in the case, which was initially filed in 1993 in federal court in New York.

      “The inspections today were a double defeat for Chevron,” said Prieto. “Chevron’s attempt to delay backfired and we now have even more evidence of how Texaco polluted the rainforest.”

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:

top videos