Community | March 11, 2009 | 114 comments

'America will collapse'

Vierotchka
America must work on starting a new economy and not restarting the old one or it will resemble the former Soviet Union, says author and blogger Dmitry Orlov.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Random
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Random 7 more
  3.     
    |

114 comments // 'America will collapse'

  • QCBUCKI
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • what I think is sad is every injustice on every level would have kept right on keeping on with all the silence we posess,If it were not for job loss and housing loss.Now thanks to all that evil money loss(the very money you could only want in evil greed) We find our vioces and the sky is falling .As soon as this financial down turn passes and it will most of these conversations will be history . Then we can go back to looking for all the bad things in the world at our leisure.

    • 3 years ago
  • holyshiite
    • 0
      holyshiite  
    • @lenhart - If you wrote "A" papers "at University" then you would understand the American economy better than what you are letting on. Since no American ever used the term "at University" you must have been playing make believe at some anti-American econ class and told the prof what he wanted to hear.

      How can you accuse anyone of not having their facts when you boldly declare that the US hasn't been a major producer of oil in 30 years? OMG! That is so funny. Any American knows that we are easily in the top 3 in the world( we flip back and forth with Russia for 2nd). We produce more oil than twice as much as Iran, four times as much as Iraq and three times the production of Venezuela. Oh my God, you are ignorant.

      If you truly had a record of interviewing great economists, you would certainly have visited my office. I don't remember granting any interviews to morons.

      http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0922041.html

    • 3 years ago
  • QCBUCKI
    • 0
      QCBUCKI  
    • @ Vierotchka----you go for it!! I like very much when you clarify with such deliberacy,, one isn't sure if it's a lecture or a chat at the corner bodego.

      You get, from moi, a tie with Mr. Moore
      QCBucki

    • 3 years ago
  • QCBUCKI
    • 0
      QCBUCKI  
    • @beachite 1st) WHICH administration did you ask? then how long ago did you send it? If it was this new,hardworking, "job's cut out for them" administration,who has taken on more serious USA's life saving issues since Lincoln, and still under TWO MONTHS into it's infancy, I would have to point out, BO has assertively, intelligently and bravely taken it ALL on. I seem to recall thousands of voters, journalists, and oh yes!, the "pundints" (overpaid) who doomed him prior already to Nov 4th that he's too young, inexperienced, blah blah. Now look how he is fighting for this country's very life. Why can't they just give it a year or so, then have a real look around!!
      Sorry, not an industrialist, yet I'm thinking many people around the US have a similar "easy" solution. Obama's up to his eyeballs in work and suggestions, so ask the nation, first. It may be a while. He's saving the world, (yeah a bit overdramatic...but get the point?)

    • 3 years ago
  • holyshiite
    • 0
      holyshiite  
    • "The US economy BOOMED because of OIL...

      If the US were rich in oil, then WHY did Bush insist upon attacking the oil rich Iraq.

      Fact is the US has not been a major producer of oil for at least thirty years."

      Heeheeeheheeehoooohoooooo. Can't stop laughing! In 2003 Iraq's total oil revenue at peak production was about $200B, nearly the entire GDP of the country. Walmart's sales were greater than that that year! Oil, puhleez. The war was never about oil. We never even bought much Iraqi oil and don't use it now.

      BTW, the US is the SECOND largest producer of oil in the world behind the Saudi's. Ahead of Russia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Mexico...... Heeeheeehoo God it HURTS! My headdress just fell off! So funny.

      Lenhart, please continue to to do your stand up routine! I'm in tears!

      http://www.marktaw.com/culture_and_media/politics/G...

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • vladbox
  • holyshiite
    • 0
      holyshiite  
    • holyshiite:

      @Vladbox - Why the what? Sorry, I dont think that link is opening. Try this one, http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0922041.html

      It's true. In 2003, when Iraq was allowed to produce and sell oil abroad for food, medicine, etc. it had essentially been running at full capacity. It's oil revenues were the majority of it's GDP. At less than $20Billion/mo of oil revenue, Iraq's economy was smaller than Walmart if it was its own country!

    • 3 years ago
  • QCBUCKI
    • 0
      QCBUCKI  
    • Good evening,
      Good interview. Brisk. Pointed. Intelligent.
      I must say, though, hasn't the world been foreseeing such Armageddon since they all got together a zillion years ago to make that word itself up???????
      Waiting for the 3 zillionth convention in Vegas to decide what happened, and should we run a sequel to the first??

    • 3 years ago
  • Prettynpink6
  • Bill_Robison
    • 0
      Bill_Robison  
    • My faith in my fellow man is too low to believe the US will break-up. Man seems to always do the wrong thing or let the wrong things happen, so I'm certain the US will not Fail.

      I love the creature comforts of today's US. I love the advances we've made in medicine. And I love air conditioning. But I don't think we (as a people or society) are better off with all these "advantages."

      It will never happen, but it would be nice if we were forced from our homes and onto our porches because there was no A/C.

      It might be a nicer community if we couldn't travel miles away to work or purchase goods/services.

      It might not be that bad to have a moneyless economy, where people had to barter for everything.

      Crime would absolutely go down. Try breaking into a house when everyone in the neighborhood sleeps with their windows open and no A/C. You can hear dogs barking from blocks away.

      Families would live much closer and would be forced to put-up with each other out of necessity and lack of choices.

      Nursing homes would empty and churches would fill up. Even if most churches were not faith-based.

      I say BRING IT ON. LET IT BURN DOWN SO WE CAN START OVER!

      But I know it will never happen. It's just a dream.

    • 3 years ago
  • pshot
    • 0
      pshot  
    • People around the world want us to fall so they can fill smug. We as American can not fall into this crap. We have survived civil war, depression, 2 world wars, Vietnam war, many recessions, the worst terror attack in history. Most countries would have fallen long ago and these asshole foreigners can't understand why we haven't fallen. Only the strong survive so let stand up together and kick these people in the teeth.

    • 3 years ago
  • sue4e3
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • From looking at the rankings of countries on how much percentage of GDP is spent on education, United States ranks number 57. There are countries like Lesotho, Uzbekistan, and Cuba that spend more of the GDP than the United States.

      If the United States spent the same percentage of GDP on education as say Cuba does at 9.4%, the United States would basically be providing a free college education to everyone at that level of spending.

      I agree that we do need to have a completely new economy, one that equalizes the drive for profits with the drive to provide all citizens with their basic needs; housing, food, medical care, and education. This is what would stimulate the economy well into the future because it creates a less distressed and suffering society. People have a chance to feel happy again and to prosper and create small businesses.

    • 3 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • Part II: As I have stated before on this site, I am largely satisfied with the structure of our government EXCEPT for the role of federal agencies. Those buggers just seem to grow and grow and grow, and as an attorney who works with them a great deal, I am not in love with the idea of being "governed" by people who are so far removed from the Democratic process, having never been elected by a vote of the people, for example. I also find their procedural protections to often be fictitious at best.

      Let me give you just one example. Until recently, the telephone company monopolies were regulated at the state level for intrastate communications by a state's public utility commission and at the interstate level by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for communications that traveled between states or originated from or terminated to a foreign country. At a typical STATE commission a dispute between two telecom companies was/is handled in much the same way such a dispute would be handled in court - both sides are allowed to ask questions of the other side and cross-examine any witness testimony. This is important because justice in this country requires a certain level of what is known as "due process" meaning essentially that if the dirty rotten scoundrel company that opposes you decides to fight dirty and tell lies in their testimony, you can at least force that company to pony up copies of documents that might reveal the existence of the lies or cross-examine their witness and catch them in testimony that is inconsistent with the lies.

      At the FCC, the process is COMPLETELY different. Virtually ALL of the proceedings in which I have participated at the FCC are decided in their entirety on the basis of comments submitted by interested parties. There is no opportunity for discovery (asking questions of your opponent) and there is no opportunity to cross examine the person who wrote the comments for that company. The rather absurd result is that the winner in contests fought before the FCC is often the party that can tell the biggest lies most convincingly. My PERSONAL opinion is that an organization with the massive resources that the FCC has should offer MORE due process protections to the parties that come before it, not LESS protections. And believe me, this is just the tip of a very large iceberg of problems at these federal agencies.

    • 3 years ago
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • the U.S. will not collapse ! We stand on the backs of a multitude of people who died so that those who want the U.S to fall have the right to say it .We keep going and we've proven it time and agian.When this country meets it's end it will do it united.Nothing unites this country better than adversity

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • sue4e3:

      Not any more.

      Furthermore, you stand on the backs of tens of millions of dead people around the world which your country has killed so that it can have the lifestyle and prosperity you have been enjoying.

    • 3 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • The US will collapse because we're being run by the same bankers that created Communism. Our propaganda is just better than the old Soviet Union's propaganda, that's why Americans can't tell how far in the shit their in (up to their necks btw)

    • 3 years ago
  • meeko
    • 0
      meeko  
    • the problem is i dont think we even felt a mist of what is to be felt. many are unemployeed now, so we will rape the rich for the taxes to pay for those who are suffering, but what shall happen when the rich dont have it anymore neither? it is the lower class that pays for everything the rich does, pays for the doctors, the dentists, the chemists, buys the meds, buys the gadgets. healthcare can be reformed because it must. 300+million ppl in this world, if we were to all get sick oh trust the line outside the whitehouse might get a litte catastrophic, they have no choice. either we lead to riot and human destruction in america and set the example of failure for the rest or we hush it as much as we can.

      bush fucked it up alot and the funny thing is all his oil that he fought for is now in a process of gettin abolished with renewable energy. they say it will take a long time, it will cost alot. Nikola Tesla invented wireless long before these nifty gadgets came out, problem is they dont want to do it.

      i could care less of america falls. ppl should not be in denial however and understand "even the greatest nation has it coming back to them" - nas. if you are one with God, you should well know that greed and the sin that this country has rounded up for decades must be punished, prime examples of that are at sight. however im giving it the hope it needs. they said 2010 should start looking slightly better, lets see. if nothing seems to change then prepare urselves people for it will get ugly.

      some say the 2012 conspiracy is a lie, how? look at where we are...globally. we have one shot at survival of economic downturn, economy is what runs the world. we are 4 yrs in the making of 2012. i hate to beleive these stupid conspiracies but when u look at whats present and what could happen due to everything u really start to wonder like "holy shit did those guys really predict that shit". its a scary world ppl, i am choosing a major in school right now that revolves around music and piano, for it is a passion. i feel sorry for those that waste their times majoring in those fancy jobs, if obama gets reelected you'll be payin for me buddy and ill say thanks.

      pray people, find God, live virtuous, remove the evils out of your life. i started writing a book titled "Let Go". maybe one person will actually remember that name and if it is ever published maybe that one person taht read my reply actually goes and buys it, its how the world works. God Bless all of You.

    • 3 years ago
  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • If anyone deserves this, the USA does. We wanted socialism, we got socialism. It is said that every great civilization, goes through a "rise and fall". The Aztecs, the Mayans, the Romans, the Turks, etc. Now it is our turn.....the seeds have been planted and are being watered...we are in the process of transitioning from a democracy to socialism....By the time the people will realize they were had, (with accompanying wailing and gnashing of teeth) it will be too late....who will take after the fall of the American Empire? God only knows....

    • 3 years ago
  • sue4e3
  • regjoeschmo
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Rush Limbaugh has said that he hopes Obama 'fails'. Limbaugh is described as the most important voice in the GOP.

      Why does the GOP wish for BAD TIIMES?

      The GOP will work assiduously to SUBVERT Obama because an Obama success may very well spell the END of the GOP. Good riddance!

      Bush left Obama a deficit of some 1.2 TRILLION dollars and a NEGATIVE CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE OF

      $ -568,800,000,000

      This has happened before. the GOPPER HOOVER left FDR a collapsed economy. By rights, the GOP should never have been entrusted with political again.

      The current collapse began with Reagan's tax cut of 1982 which caused the Reagan Recession/Depression of some two years ---the longest and the worst since the Great Depression of the 1920s.

      A trend, in which only the top one percent got richer, was reversed breifly in Clinton's second term but resumed with Bush. Check the BEA, the Bureau of Labors Stats, the Census Bureau for OFFICIAL CONFIRMATION of my assertion. Those are the facts.

      Now --the point is this: the GOP cannot afford to allow another Democrat to repeat yet another incredible success while EVERY GOP Pres at least since the Great Depression have presided over recessions, job declines, rising disparities in incomes and every other characteristic of a third world economy.

      The GOP will subvert Obama because an Obama success could mean the end of the GOP.

      And good f_ckin riddance!

    • 3 years ago
  • Eleganza
    • 0
      Eleganza  
    • lenhart:

      When Reagan first put forth the idea that if we would just let the rich further engorge themselves that there would be more crumbs falling off their table for the rest of us, we the people voted for Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush 2..well,here we are at the end of THAT road...Government got out of the way did away with all those pesky regulations and the banking and corporate entities put it to us in a big way..personally I'm sick of it and ready to try another approach.

    • 3 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • Following is a link to the CIA's World Fact Book - Nations Ranked by Current Account Balance.

      Keep in mind when reading this list that the lower the nation is ranked on the list the BIGGER the BALANCE OF TRADE DEFICIT.

      The fact of the matter is: THE US IS ALREADY BANKRUPT. It's on the CIAs list with, by far, the WORLD'S BIGGEST BALANCE OF TRADE DEFICIT or, in other words, NEGATIVE CURRENT ACCOUNT.

      https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2187rank.h...

      As I said, the US is ALREADY BANKRUPT ---kept afloat by CHINA for whom the US is a cow to be milked, a 'farm' of eager consumers who are hooked on buy cheaply made Chinese crap.

      The US would have collapsed even sooner but for the fact that China must keep the US afloat in order to MILK IT.

      People, wake up and get wise! This is NOT a matter of opinion. It is a fact!

    • 3 years ago
  • antoine_99
  • delas78
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • This country is not falling apart. I have thought for a long time - that it might be great if the huge stupid, greedy facade of Wall Street and the supply-side republican rich, phony social order, house-of-cards McDonald's fast food-style financial services industry would fall.
      Let the big banks fall if they can't stand and let people's feet find the ground once again.
      What a great thing it would be to see that beautiful shining light in everyone's eyes once again.
      We've had a fake society for years.

      Maybe a huge EMP that shorts out all the electronics. All stupid - gone.
      No more going to work. No more flippin' the bird on the highway. No more grinding teeth. Just go home and make love to your spouse. Plant a garden.
      Smile awhile.

    • 3 years ago
  • beachite
    • 0
      beachite  
    • I HAVE ASKED THIS ADMINISTRATION A QUESTION WHICH I DON'T EXPECT TO GET AN ANSWER AND I WILL NOW ASK IT PUBLICLY ---WHY CAN'T WE REOPEN OUR STEEL MILLS AND PUT PEOPLE BACK TO WORK ? I KNOW THAT IT WOULD TAKE TIME AND EFFORT TO REOPEN THEM BUT ISN"T IT A GOOD START ?

    • 3 years ago
  • TerryA
    • 0
      TerryA  
    • I agree with Janforgore. Until this Country stops prostituting its self nothing is ever going to change. We have sold our industry, our national resources, our technology and our pride to the highest bidder. Until we again take our nation back to the industrial age that made us great, we very well may be headed in exactly the same direction as the Soviet Union. Our Nation is based on a false economy. We are a service based economy. What that means is, we simply pass the same money from hand to hand within our own country. We buy twice what we sell making us the largest consumer based economy in the world.

      Thanks to our Government, we sold our steel industry so we could buy it back at an inflated rate. We sold out our Oil industry because we needed allies in the Middle East. We sold our pulp wood and oil to Asia because they pay better than we Americans do. We sold our land and the buildings on it, simply because we needed to recuperate our depleting cash reserves. We have sold or given away our technology and buy it back at a premium.

      We very well could be looking at the collapse of an Empire. We need to create a new economy, not keep throwing money we don't have to save one that no longer works.

    • 3 years ago
  • peglegninja
    • 0
      peglegninja  
    • PS This really isn't news. News to me should be more based on the facts available. CSPAN can be tedious but if you really want to know what's up you have to take a look.

    • 3 years ago
  • wally60
    • 0
      wally60  
    • he is right it will collapse think it through to much
      spending lower tax revenue its a recipe for
      disaster . the biggest problem is the rest of the world
      will go with it and we will have a total mess.
      pull your head out of the sand it is comming
      and unfortunately we cant stop it!

    • 3 years ago
  • oldgerman
    • 0
      oldgerman  
    • There are always optimistic and pessimistic people around; so just hope and do what you can to provide from collapsing.
      But worse: there are always some people between which hope to malke money out of the bad situation.

    • 3 years ago
  • peglegninja
    • 0
      peglegninja  
    • Markets are too complicated for anyone to really understand. You can say that you can't print borrow and tax your way into prosperity, I can get behind that. But no one can predict a market. My two pennies - the government needs to butt out.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vikingblood
  • fiat_lux088
  • ras_menelik
    • 0
      ras_menelik  
    • Image
    • An inscription inside a watch owned by President Abraham Lincoln is seen after the watch was opened in Washington

      "thank God we have a government"

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • America learned a bitter lesson in our "Civil War". We are a Nation bonded by blood shed by fathers and brothers on opposing sides of this conflict. We were united in the horrible conflicts originated by Europeans in WW1 and WW2. America will not turn on itself! We may turn on others, but not on our friends and family. We are a nation of immigrants, wanderers, not afraid to relocate our families to any part of America. For this reason alone, we will not separate from the overall federal system. Non Americans seem unable to grasp this basic difference between us and most of the World. The more conflict we face, the more unified we become. Bin Laden proved this point.

    • 3 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • I am hard-pressed to think of two countries MORE unlike each other than the United States of today and the Soviet Union at the time of its breakup. I think the comparisons made by Mr. Orlov are at best mildly interesting but in the end occupy the margins of a serious discussion on this point. Just one example (albeit a MASSIVE one) is that there are countries, companies, institutions, enormous international pension funds, etc that have a vested interest in seeing that the U.S. not default on its debt. Even if our economy tanked twice as badly as it already has, these investors would gladly take a write-down of 10%, 20% or even 30% of their original investment in U.S. debt rather than tell enormous pools of their workers, for example, that all of their retirement pensions have gone up in smoke. Further, we simply have too many assets that have too much intrinsic value when compared to the former Soviet Union. Even if, let's say, an Apple Computer were to shut down and be sold for 20 cents on the dollar, there is still plenty of wealth in the world that would snap that opportunity up in a heartbeat and start pumping out iPods again (this is not going to happen, but when you think of how many Apple Computer-type companies there are all across the U.S., the possibility of total collapse becomes more and more absurd). At the point of its demise, there were U.S. CITIES that had larger (and certainly more vibrant) economies than the entire Soviet Union. Things are ugly and going to get uglier here, but this is just someone trying to cash in on a ghost story. And he might just pull it off...this IS America, after all...

    • 3 years ago
  • Mymicz1
    • 0
      Mymicz1 [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      You have to admit that the nepotism, corruption, and greed destroyed many things in both cases. Whatever ism you support it doesn't seem to stand up to these things. Government should be more maleable to do whatever is necessary, any ism just gets you stuck in one school of thought whose ideas have already run out. How about...Whateversavesyourassism. Seems like the govt's MO.

    • 3 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • cztheday:

      Part I: I appreciate the truth at the heart of what you are saying. But one attribute I see in post after post on this site that I find troubling is this notion that "Government," even where that term is being used as shorthand for the "Federal Government" (i.e., leaving aside all of the state, county and local governments across the country) seems to be viewed as this massive, monolithic entity such that people actually attribute motives and personality traits to it. So, for example, one reads that the "Government is evil" or that such-and-such is "exactly what the Government wants you to believe."

      The Federal Government is made up of literally hundreds of thousands of employees, the greatest concentration of which are located in Washington, D.C. but of which ENORMOUS numbers are scattered in federal buildings, post offices, courthouses, etc all across the country. These employees literally come in every conceivable size, shape, color, and ethnic background – not to mention the full spectrum of political beliefs (one tiny little example that demonstrates this is the current make-up of the U.S. Supreme Court with the members having different genders, races, ethnicities, religious backgrounds and beliefs and occupying the full spectrum from ultra-conservative to ultra-liberal in their political philosophies.

      Needless to say, these several hundred thousand employees are certainly NOT all getting together on a conference call every Monday morning to decide whose life to ruin this week or how to take the country down the road to either socialism or Adam Smith entrepreneurial capitalism. Heck, Obama has a hard time getting just his CABINET and their key staffers into a single room to discuss policy. And given the egos in that group, they are not likely to sit around, hold hands and sing Koom-bye-ya (have NO idea how to spell that) anytime soon, let alone get together to create some kind of evil conspiracy.

      So when you say things like "government should be more malleable" I struggle to understand precisely what you mean. Do you mean, for example, that the Department of Transportation should have rules that allow for more of a case-by-case analysis than a one-size-fits-all analysis? If so, do you mean on ALL issues or just one specific set of rules?

      And since my career has primarily been one of dealing with various federal and state agencies, I can assure you that for every person who wishes a particular agency could be more flexible to handle cases that are outside the norm, there is someone else who wishes that the same agency would be more predictable by establishing one set of rules and sticking to them so that private citizens and businesses are not constantly having to adjust to new sets of expectations with regard, for example to how that private citizen runs his businesses or invests for retirement.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • cztheday:

      Vierotchka,

      If you really believe that the United States is a police state or that it is anywhere NEAR the level of the old Soviet Union in that regard, your first experience of a REAL police state is going to be quite a shock. Many of America's policies, especially during the last administration, are troubling to me. But worrying about the authorities bursting into my home and dragging me off for questioning because I wrote the immediately preceding sentence is not among them. During my 47 years in this country, despite visiting all but four of the states, usually by automobile, I have never once been asked by ANYONE to "show my papers" or explain who I am or where I am going. Had such questions been posed to me, I would have refused to answer, and I would have been allowed to proceed on my way. That kind of freedom was absolutely unimaginable in the old Soviet Union. I remember once during my hot-headed youth when I was a columnist for the student newspaper in college, I called Ronald Reagan a traitor to his country because of the shambles he had made of our economy via his massive increases in defense spending and simultaneous tax cuts that drove our deficits through the roof. He had argued that the tax cuts would generate huge growth in economic activity. Taxation of that new activity, even at the new, lower rates would, he said, more than offset the tax cuts AND the greater defense spending. He was wrong, of course, and yet this is exactly the same program the Republicans have been proposing as an alternative to stimulus these past several months.

      In any event, that column went out to thousands of students and hundreds of faculty and administrators. I didn't receive so much as a critical phone call from a reader who disagreed, let alone a visit from the "secret police." Had I lived under Stalin and made such a mistake as a college student I MAY have lived a couple of years in one of the gulags before I perished...maybe not that long.

      The glaring exception is, of course, Guantanamo -- a national embarrassment because of our failure to provide the due process to the prisoners there that we would provide to even the most storied felon here within the external borders of the United States. While I have little doubt that most of the Guantanamo prisoners deserve to be incarcerated, that is not an excuse for us to abandon the principles that defined our rise to the status of great nation.

      The failure to provide due process at Guantanamo can either be the first step in an erosion that finds its way into the borders of this country or it can be an anomaly that is remedied as quickly and as fully as is possible at this late date and added into the column of "never again."

      Nonetheless, Guantanamo does NOT make the U.S. a police state.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Yes well, to see WALMART collapse would be great! That is what we should be doing. Working on getting those small businesses up and running and holding these criminal corporations accountable.To see those mom and pop stores thriving. To see MADE IN THE USA instead of MADE IN CHINA on everything we touch. To have healthy food. If WALMART collapsed today so what? It would only mean that China lost its cash cow. We did without it before and we can do without it again. And those who work at WALMART for paultry wages and to be abused could then look to other places for work and perhaps even get healthcare coverage. Why not? But this BS that "America will collapse" is just designed to put down the entire country and that is something I'm actually gettting sick of seeing.

      The people of America can do so much good when we are truly brought together for a common good cause. So yes, ridding this country of the cancer of corporate greed may well in the end actually make America stronger and healthier, not make it collapse.This country has survived a Revolution, a civil war, two world wars, a great depression, and social changes that would have brought other countries down. So I will not believe that we can't do it again, and I will then continue to dismiss these negativist attitudes. It is the same with the climate crisis. Not many seem to give a sh^t so they say it is too far gone to do anything and that is just plain wrong.

      I don't post about acidic oceans or melting glaciers or water shortages because I think we are doomed and can't do anything about it. I post them to hopefully tell people how it is and to motivate them to get up and do something about it because we can. And even scientists are saying that if we do it now we can bring CO2 levels at least to within 350PPM which will sustain us longer.

      NOTHING collapses unless you want it to. Today is a new day so I say, get up and do something to keep that from happening instead of trying to make us all believe that to get up in the morning is a waste of time.

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
  • Mymicz1
  • peglegninja
    • 0
      peglegninja  
    • JanforGore:

      People love to knock walmart but no other entity, anywhere, has provided cheaper goods to poor people. In history. I don't shop there because I don't need to but if I was living below the poverty level I'd be extremely thankful for walmart.

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
  • estee_arie
    • 0
      estee_arie  
    • I WANT MOM AND POP SHOPS TO EMERGE - I WANT AN ACTUAL BUTCHER SHOP- OR CHEESE STORE- OR BAKERY. IM SICK OF "SUPER STORES" THAT'S WHY EVERYONE IS SUPER SIZED. IM TIRED OF GENERIC CORPORATIONS RUNNING OUR COUNTRY AND FEEDING US CRAP. THAT'S WHY I LOVE EUROPE. YOU WONT FIND A TARGET IN DAM SQUARE. OH AND YOU WALK EVERYWHERE- CAUSE THAT'S HOW THE CITIES ARE DESIGNED - HERE THEY ARE SPREAD OUT FOR FUEL CONSUMPTION AND NEED. OK - I JUMPED OFF MY SOAP BOX, AND I FEEL BETTER :) I CAN GO ON.

    • 3 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
  • estee_arie
  • DouginLA
    • 0
      DouginLA  
    • estee_arie:

      Cities in Europe were designed that way due to scarcity of land not walking convenience. The Us has never suffered from land scarcity and thus grew outward. Personally I do not think it is possible to change that without seriously violating all kinds of civil liberties. Though I do agree 100% with you on the small specialty shops. I am lucky enough to live in a small town outside of Mobile, Al and I am able to buy a my veggies, cheese, etc from a Farmers market and have a small butcher right down the road. The only thing I am missing is a bakery.

    • 3 years ago
  • estee_arie
    • 0
      estee_arie  
    • estee_arie:

      have you ever been to europe- there is truth to what you said- but not completely, if your generalizing about town development and having to do with the land that was evalable for development @ that time. you dont live in LA ...mobile? cause of your name. just wondering.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Sad so many are actually hoping for the collapse of this country. I would hope crap like this would only inspire people to get up and prove them wrong. I may not be happy with the government, but I sure do love this country with all of my heart and will do all I can to keep her together. Too bad others can't say that and instead actually wish for its demise. In reality, we may well face an economic breakdown but I don't believe we will fall apart as a country. At least, I am hoping not. We need a new entrepreneureal spirit to bring us into the new century and bring manufactutring and green jobs back to this country. Instead of trying to depress people with others' dire predictions who don't
      even live here, how about tryitng to inspire people to get up and make that happen?

    • 3 years ago
  • Mymicz1
    • 0
      Mymicz1 [removed]  
    • JanforGore:

      Two thumbs up from the peanut gallery. We can localize and green our country, never waste a good crisis. Like the show Greensburg where they rebuilt a hurricane hit town mostly green, and hurricane proof (duh). I love America, warts and all.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • JanforGore:

      JanforGore, the prosperity and social cohesion your country has enjoyed relied entirely on the exploitation, wars, pollutions, etc., your country has wreaked on most of the world, including America having only 5% of the world's population but using 25% of the world's energy and more than 25% of the world's resources. Is that really what you wish to see continue?

    • 3 years ago
  • Solarlife
    • 0
      Solarlife  
    • Image
    • Money talk, avoid social unrest

      Don't you have the feeling, Banks and big 3 automakers are pocketing the last money reserves before big bang ? "We need investments in safety nets, Infrastructure, and SMEs small and medium size companies to avoid social unrest", said World Bank president ZOELLICK in march 2009".

      - Instead of endless billion bailouts, depts for home owners have to be written down to 25% and loans provided for middle class start-up entrepreneurs with new ideas creating a real market demand; not just consumerism.

      Write down depts to 25% restarting middle class economy

    • 3 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • Solarlife:

      The World Bank has supported a number of foolish agendas and political enemies of the U.S. They along with all of the other "bankers" of this world have earned my total distain. They are now in a select group of lawyers, doctors, and car salesmen.

    • 3 years ago
  • Solarlife
    • 0
      Solarlife  
    • Solarlife:

      May be true, but Zoellick is a new breed, America and the world has to come back to the roots, small enterprises. Thanks for commenting, view also China investing $15bn in small enterprises. GM would burn $15bn in 2 months

    • 3 years ago
  • oldgerman
  • oldgerman
    • 0
      oldgerman  
    • I do not beliefe any country exept some of the third world will collapse.
      And these countries have a moralic right that others help them - except Simbabwe.

    • 3 years ago
  • fuckoffgenX89
    • 0
      fuckoffgenX89  
    • i agree and disagree, i agree that as a country we don't have a sense of community .let's be serious or country has became a gangland where demorcrats and repulicans have became the new crips and bloods, and don't get started on the pink elephants of race, religion and sexuality.yes we have a black president,but personally i think the south didn't get the message,they still think it's a joke .as for religon im a christain and i was taught to love all but were so brute on another religon that we shoot first and ask later instead of learning , at least be aware and as for sexuality ,do your thing , love who you wanna love, just use protection .but i disagree i love my country and put alot of faith in my generation but we need to open our eyes stop trying to get a million friends on myspace, chris brown and rihanna, the hills,and gossip girl and be more productive, it's fun to party ,but also show that we can be more aware of issues.

    • 3 years ago
  • clownpuncher
  • current89
  • Vierotchka
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • current89:

      First, I previously knew about this statement, being that I'm a big bill maher fan. I was trying to be sarcastic. Also, nice try, don't take things out of context, which you did.

      1. He was referring to the economy, not the US government, big difference.

      2. As a matter of technicality he said "This Could be 1931". Key words "could be." If I recall correctly will and could are two separate terms, with two very seperate meanings.
      3. Krugman:" Everything did eventually come back after 1933."

      Facts are stubborn things.

      With all of that said. I do take Krugman seriously being that I read his column in the new york times. His last one was a particularly good one, regarding our lagging polices on the economy. Next time I'll place a :sarcasm: box next to a comment, so as not to create misunderstandings.

      You can read his latest column here which I'm sure you already did.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/opinion/09krugman.html

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
    • 0
      Dmitri_Molotov  
    • I hope it collapses. The Balkanization of the USA is imminent. It might take 100 years, it might take 10. Several distinct regions of the US are so culturally and politically removed that it's already apparent.
      Most likely, the first to secede will be either the California Republic or the Texas Republic (Chuck Norris wants to be president of Texas, I shit thee not), followed by other regions such as the deep south, which will form into the Confederated States of America and ally closely with Texas, and Washington and Oregon, which will ally closely with California.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vikingblood
    • 0
      Vikingblood  
    • Dmitri_Molotov:

      I don't know why you care so much about Californian Secession. People are a**holes in California and the women are bitchy and shallow (money-grubbing too). Not that the rest of the US regions are any better, they just suck in different ways.

      It matters not if the climate is more leftist if the society and people are jerk-offs. What good is being in the political and social-climate you prefer if you can't stand the people?

      (I'm Californian)

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • pjacobs51
    • 0
      pjacobs51  
    • Not pleasant to think about, but he sure has a point. Out of work military and released prisoners by the thousands? Are we heading for a Road Warrior type future?

    • 3 years ago
  • nol
  • 1percent
  • jh64487
  • Vierotchka
  • jh64487
  • Vierotchka
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • jh64487:

      What resources?

      The US economy BOOMED because of OIL...

      If the US were rich in oil, then WHY did Bush insist upon attacking the oil rich Iraq.

      Fact is the US has not been a major producer of oil for at least thirty years.

      Check out the CIAs OWN LIST OF NET DEBTOR NATIONS.

      The US HAS THE LARGEST BALANCE OF TRADE DEFICIT IN THE WORLD.

      If the US were a PRODUCING nation that would not be the case. If the US were among the LEADING PRODUCING nations it would NOT be at the bottom of the the CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE list the with LARGEST trade deficit in the world.

      The US is ALREADY BANKRUPT

    • 3 years ago
  • holyshiite
    • 0
      holyshiite  
    • jh64487:

      "The US economy BOOMED because of OIL...

      If the US were rich in oil, then WHY did Bush insist upon attacking the oil rich Iraq.

      Fact is the US has not been a major producer of oil for at least thirty years."

      Heeheeeheheeehoooohoooooo. Can't stop laughing! In 2003 Iraq's total oil revenue at peak production was about $200B, nearly the entire GDP of the country. Walmart's sales were greater than that that year! Oil, puhleez. The war was never about oil. We never even bought much Iraqi oil and don't use it now.

      BTW, the US is the SECOND largest producer of oil in the world behind the Saudi's. Ahead of Russia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Mexico...... Heeeheeehoo God it HURTS! My headdress just fell off! So funny.

      Lenhart, please continue to to do your stand up routine! I'm in tears!

      http://www.marktaw.com/culture_and_media/politics/GlobalOil.html

    • 3 years ago
  • holyshiite
  • Vierotchka
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • holyshiite:

      The US will --of course --collapse and/or break up for several reasons:

      1) the economy is no longer sustainable. Thanks to GOP policies at least since Ronald Reagan, the US imports most cars, refrigerators, micro-wave ovens, electronics of all types from other nations. Wal-Mart alone is a conduit by which Chinese products are literally DUMPED the U.S. market. The result is a loss of US jobs and the subversion of domestic industries which can no longer compete.

      2) The US dollar has all but collapsed already. NO NATION HAS SURVIVED LONG WITHOUT a viable currency. The US dollar was PROPPED UP by China because China wished to continue dumping their product on the US consumer. China would not have been able to continue doing so had the dollar been allowed to collapse utterly.

      3) Americans don't like each very much. For example, I don't like holyshiite --his ilk and anyone who shares his prejudice your utterly and provable IGNORANCE, His bone-headed comments, his inability to put as many as two words together significantly.

      4) Americans are divided geographically. But for corporate incursions recently, the south was always a very different culture from the industrial North and an increasingly 'libertarian' West.

      5) Other divisions are even more profound: liberals are reviled by bigots, intelligent people are attacked by religious fundamentalists and other ignoramuses. 'Proponents of 'Intelligent Design' are a prime example.

      6) The US population has divided itself into psychopaths (the GOP) and normal people. Carl Jung may have predicted this when he stated that 30 percent of a population are certifiably psychopathic. In the US that 30 percent is the GOP.

      There are many --especially down south and in Texas --who will WELCOME a break up of America.

      When it finally happens the US may break up into as many as five independent nations.

    • 3 years ago
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • holyshiite:

      Holyshite is DEAD WRONG.

      The US is already BANKRUPT by any definition, but most notably, Bush left Obama a ONE TRILLION DOLLAR BUDGET DEFICIT and the CIA list the US as having --by far --the LARGEST BALANCE OF TRADE DEFICIT in the world.

      The US --already bankrupt --is kept afloat by China so that China can continue to sell its crap. At some point, however, China will have to pull the plug on the US and when it does, both nations get sucked into the economic black hole.

      Check the CIA - The World Factbook: Rank Order, Current Account Balance.

      https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2187rank.h...

      Nation's with NEGATIVE ACCOUNT BALANCES i.e, ''balance of trade deficits' at the bottom of the list where the numbers are NEGATIVE.

      If US industries were still productive, viable or competitive the US would not be pulling up the rear.

      Another CLUE that the US economy is ALREADY COLLAPSED is the ONE TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT left Obama by BUSH, the WORST PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY.

      Check out the graphic at:

      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_L6pDyjqqsvY/SaWYr1k7BnI/AAAAAAAAaPU/HakXzqX-ikY/s400/d...

    • 3 years ago
  • holyshiite
  • lenhart
    • 0
      lenhart  
    • holyshiite:

      I will never understand WHY idiots wil spout off about things that they could not possibly know anything about.

      FYI-- I wrote 'A' papers on the topics of 'big business' and 'Economics and Government' at Unversity.

      Later --as a network correspondent (ABC, TSN, and a MAJOR MARKET CBS Affiliate) I interviewed TWO of the leading American economists of this century --MORRIS ADELMAN (M.I.T.) and MILTON FRIEDMAN, of whom you may have heard.

      What I will never understand, however, is why IDIOTS will persist in shooting their mouths off about things that they could not possibly know, understand, or have personal knowledge.

      Allow me to pass on some advice to you, Holy Shit: STICK TO WHAT YOU KNOW FOR A FACT AND CAN VERIFY.

      It could save you a lot of embarrasment throughout life. It would also help if you got a life.

      I say that not because I don't give a shit what you think, but because I just hate to see anyone make a total fuckin' fool of themselves.

    • 3 years ago
  • AveryMoore
  • holyshiite
    • 0
      holyshiite  
    • holyshiite:

      @lenhart - If you wrote "A" papers "at University" then you would understand the American economy better than what you are letting on. Since no American ever used the term "at University" you must have been playing make believe at some anti-American econ class and told the prof what he wanted to hear.

      How can you accuse anyone of not having their facts when you boldly declare that the US hasn't been a major producer of oil in 30 years? OMG! That is so funny. Any American knows that we are easily in the top 3 in the world( we flip back and forth with Russia for 2nd). We produce more oil than twice as much as Iran, four times as much as Iraq and three times the production of Venezuela. Oh my God, you are ignorant.

      If you truly had a record of interviewing great economists, you would certainly have visited my office. I don't remember granting any interviews to morons.

      http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0922041.html

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • metaloki
    • 0
      metaloki  
    • Vierotchka:

      Sorry, I watched only 5 seconds and my sound wasn't working.(realtek ) it looked to me that the woman was the one that made the comment.
      Please forgive me?
      Just the same though; my response was to the Title of this link so just replace she/her with he/him and you can get a feel for what i'm saying, yes?

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • metaloki
    • 0
      metaloki  
    • I can certainly respect Dmitri's opinion however close it may be to her own wishful thinking but......
      I believe her prophecy will come true..............
      When osama bin laden turns himself in after shaving his stinky beard off cause Paris Hilton found him and demanded that he "do the right thing".

      Don't worry folks! besides; it's China's job to ruin us!

    • 3 years ago
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • america won't collapse people here are to busy going on ignoring every thing to notice any thing real important and well if a tree falls in the woods and noones there to hear it does it make sound

    • 3 years ago
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • I'm gonna say this is horseshit propaganda to make the 2nd world feel better about itself. With all due respect of course, V.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • neocongo:

      I hope you're right, but I must say that a growing number of economists and other highly qualified individuals from the first world are echoing similar pessimistic predictions, based on a number of alarming indications.

    • 3 years ago
  • neocongo
  • Vierotchka
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • neocongo:

      I looked at the first three sites you listed V. One was some healthy living site written by someone with zero understanding of economics. The other two, if you scroll down far enough, reveal the words "New World Order," which when seen, should send conspiracy theory alarms shrieking in your head.

      Sorry, no dice. Conspiracy theory and propaganda really strive to achieve similar things, largely unwarranted fear.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • neocongo:

      I think you might be taking Krugman out of context. His statement was hyperbole I believe, and I read his column every Monday, and he's stated nothing like this that I've seen, in a drawn out argument.

    • 3 years ago
  • neocongo
1 - 100 of 114
more from Community:

top videos