Community | March 28, 2009 | 62 comments

BJ's Employee files Confederate Flag Lawsuit

Image
ClipsFC
A worker has filed a lawsuit against his employer, BJ's Wholesale Club, over a Confederate flag flap, his attorney confirmed on Tuesday.

Bobby Tillett first spoke with Channel 4 in May of 2008, when he said he was told he couldn't park his pickup truck, which flies a Confederate flag, in the employee lot.

Tillett said his managers told him if he did not remove the flag, he couldn't park in the employee lot. Instead of removing the flag, Tillett decided to park on public property about a half-mile from the BJ's off Pritchard Road.

Nearly one year later, Tillett's attorney confirmed that Tillett plans to sue BJ's.

"I'm a firm believer it's not about winning or losing, it's about right and wrong. It's definitely wrong," Tillett told Channel 4 last May.

BJ's made the following statement about the controversy:

"Like all employers, we have guidelines of appropriate personal behavior and expression at work. While the policy does not identify any specific type of expression, it generally prohibits expression that is rude, abusive, hostile or intimidating. Under these guidelines, we asked this team member to not display the Confederate flag in our parking lot. We are confident that we have struck the right balance for all of our team members and their work environment."

However, Tillett disagrees with the company's stance, and he will fight it in court.

"It's about heritage; it's about pride," Tillett said in May. "I don't look at it much different than the American flag. There's been a lot of blood spilled over that flag, too, and I love that flag, and I'll fly it 'till the day I die."

Despite the lawsuit, Tillett continues to work at BJ's, parking a half-mile away on public property and walking to work. He said the work environment has been tense.

When asked about if he's concerned about losing his job, Tillett said, "I hope firing comes up. Makes things worse for them."

Tillett said the case has bounced between federal and state court. He would not release many specifics about the case, but said he is seeking less than $75,000.
  1. groups:
    Community,   WTF,   Law
  2. tags:
    News WTF Current Law 4 more
  3.     
    |

62 comments // BJ's Employee files Confederate Flag Lawsuit

  • Robert_Adams
    • 0
      Robert_Adams  
    • hey brother, i've run into the same problem. an "unknown" person complained to my foreman, that my sticker on my welding hood that reads "if this flag offends you, then you need a history lesson" "offends" him. my foreman inturn told me to take it off or i'm fired. i told him to get my union steward. the steward said the same thing. i said"NO", "I WILL NOT REMOVE IT." So now we wait and see what they do friday. any advice on what i CAN do if they fire me?

    • 2 years ago
  • FirstClassOnly
    • 0
      FirstClassOnly  
    • I can't see how he would win or get anything from BJ's. They had a right to ask him to move the flag or park the car off the companies property. They have customers that react much like some people did here in this thread. And they are a business. They have certain rights as an employer.

    • 2 years ago
  • ssnigg
    • 0
      ssnigg  
    • I think he is doing both a statement and getting some bucks from Bj not sure how successful he will be on the bucks. I agree though that it really doesn not matter what the message is, if they told him he is not allowed in employee lot then he has to get his sorry ass truck out of there

    • 2 years ago
  • JSmith44
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • Image
    • @ Found you are right, i too have lived in the N and the S, and seen what you are talking about.
      But i'll bet most people who fly the stars and bars don't know that isn't the actual and only Confederate flag,

      That one is the "Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Va."

      See photos at link.

      I think that most people would not be offended by the flag on the right.
      I'm not saying I"d fly either one, just what point is the guy trying to make?
      Does he want to make a statement or incite a lawsuit?

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
  • Paratus
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • Paratus:

      U Do ? .. well we shall see how the courts rule on this, should be interesting. I will make sure to bookmark and follow that story though that could drag out for a while.

    • 2 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
    • 0
      Found_Avenue  
    • I have lived in the south, and seen this flag sold at state fairs and festivals, and worn proudly on tee-shirts by plenty of white people. I have lived in the north, where a festival booth would be shut down immediately for selling confederate flag merchandise.

      To those who simply see this as a free speech issue: The flag may represent something totally innocuous to you, but it is entirely ignorant and self centered to pretend that you're unaware that it represents a symbol of hatred to the black people standing next to you. They are not amused, nor do they see it as a symbol of rebellion or southern pride. They see it as a symbol of hatred. Even if you do not see it that way, you must be lucid enough to notice what that symbol represents to those around you.

      Yes, of course you have the right to fly the confederate flag, the same way you have the right to hang a swastika air freshener on your rearview mirror, but don't be shocked when people make assumptions about you for doing so. Whether you're a racist or not, by simply displaying that symbol, you're letting people know that you're fine with being seen as a racist.

      The swastika was a symbol for Jainism before Hitler co-opted it, but you can bet that any modern day Jainists in the western world do not walk around covered in swastikas, because THEY KNOW HOW IT WILL BE INTERPRETED, and they RESPECT their neighbors and associates enough to not intentionally offend them.

      We do not exist in a vacuum, people. We are on this earth with others, and if you display a symbol that is widely recognized as offensive, people will assume it is your intention to offend. The confederate flag is a polarizing symbol, and the attitude that defends that symbol is a huge part of what made me move back up north.

      And as far as BJ's goes, they are allowed to tell their employees to represent themselves in a certain way. If this guy broke company code, or did something that they felt would drive business away from the store, then BJ's had every right in the world to react the way they did.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • The main reason why slavery is connected to this flag is because of the emancipation proclamation.

      "I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." ... My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that."
      -abraham lincoln in a letter to Hoarace greeley

      Maybe Im biased, I had a friend who was murdered because his friend was wearing a shirt with this flag on it, and I hate the ignorance that surrounds its interpretation.......The war was not about slavery, and neither is that flag........

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • regjoeschmo:

      I'm sorry to hear about your friend. No symbol deserves that type of reaction.

      While slavery was not the only factor in the Civil War, and Lincoln cared more about preserving the nation than freeing anyone, slavery still had a big role during the war for sure!

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • regjoeschmo:

      And that almost brings us back to where this thread started right ? .. Should displaying a symbol, flag, bumper sticker or any publicly visible message lead to hate crimes, harassment and or criminal acts? We had an interesting in case here in NJ. We had some sicko who had a fetish on Hitler. He names his son "Hitler" ..the school sued in State court saying that the kids where harassing him and they did not approve of his name. Court ruled that although it was his right to name the son anything he wanted, in this case it was considered "endangerment of a child" so they had to give him a different name.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • regjoeschmo:

      We were taught in grade school many things that werent true.....origins of thanksgiving, the reasons for the civil war, how we "explored" (more like conquered) the west...... The lies we tell our children at such a young age are nothing short of social engineering on a sick and twisted level....... Tell the children the truth.......

    • 2 years ago
  • JSmith44
    • 0
      JSmith44  
    • regjoeschmo:

      true but do we not also teach our children about free speech? And how do we explain to them that your free speech is sometimes limited depending on the situation. When we teach tolerance in schools we also tell children to embrace those with different race, sexuality, orientation etc.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • regjoeschmo:

      unless it causes specific damages or personal injury say/do whatever you want. Part of teaching our children to be open minded towards those things is to abolish the ignorace of the meaning of symbols.......

      The issue of the swastica was brought up in this thread as well, and it is mainly seen only as a hate symbol because that is all it is tought to us as children as meaning. Teach the children how and why Hitler stole to symbol, and there will be a better appreciation for the facts.....

      As for the young boy named hitler, he was not of school age, and sure they could have made the parents change the name, but instead took him for the $2-3000 they make off of adoptions.....

    • 2 years ago
  • notsure
    • 0
      notsure  
    • He would rather walk in the rain to/from work then just take the flag down or cover it when he is in the parking lot.

      Swiming in the Shallow end of the gene pool.

    • 2 years ago
  • Fanofsinatra
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Dudebro says "It's about heritage; it's about pride,"

      I've never understood this! The heritage of being stubborn slave owners who would rather break the country apart than compromise? The pride of LOSING the war? That's what you want to represent?

    • 2 years ago
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • Thing that really gets me is this "guy" has a 20+ year old home camo painted pos pickup, but can afford an attorney.

      And he's hoping they fire him to help with a lawsuit.

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • allIknowis:

      Ya, i am seeing a thread now. He is probably trying to push for a suit. Not so sure he doesn't have a case but that's up to the courts to decide. I see he's done this before with BJ.s and I wasn't aware of that.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sundance02008
  • LisaVlad
    • 0
      LisaVlad  
    • Civil rights is such a sore topic after Bush for 8 years and a supreme court that has raped Americans of simple civil rights. It looks at first blush that the company has a right to ask him to remove the car or content as long as he is on their property. Since he now parks 1/2 mile away he should be ok. (?)

    • 2 years ago
  • FirstClassOnly
  • sickinjersey
  • notsure
    • 0
      notsure  
    • Image
    • Elroy "Lucky" Kleinschmidt is the current husband of Luanne. His friends see him as lucky, hence the name. He got his name after he went to buy a 32 inch Television, realized he had to go to the bathroom, and slipped on a puddle of "pee-pee". He received a large cash settlement in court as the result of a lawsuit against the store, but it is unknown what the amount of the settlement was, as every time it is mentioned he states a different amount. He claims he will never have to work another day in his life, although not only is the amount not nearly enough to provide for all of his needs for the rest of his life, he is suffering constant pain because of the incident.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sundance02008
    • 0
      Sundance02008  
    • notsure:

      ?? This is the guy with the flag? And if so, what if anything does that have to do with BJ's complaint about the flag on his car (Civil rights, Chapter: Free Speech) I don't get your post.

    • 2 years ago
  • notsure
    • 0
      notsure  
    • notsure:

      This is a pic of "The Guy". The Text is from King of the Hill.
      He motive is not about free speech. It’s about $75 Grand & a sad attempt to feel some sort of power in his life. The flag was not the first "problem" BJ's Wholesale Club has had with this mouth breather. He is Not Mr. Smith and He is Not going to Washington.
      If BJ's Wholesale Club does not want there Employees (paid reps) dressing like Nazis or flying a Flag in THEIR PARKING LOT that a potential customer may find offensive they have that right. I do not have to agree with the politics of the guy I pay to sweep my floor but I also don’t have to listen to his crap while he is on the clock.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sundance02008
    • 0
      Sundance02008  
    • I don't care if he had his mother sitting on the antenna. Its not the message that people will take from it, read the posts here and see how many opinions we already have. This has nothing to do with his employment, they do not have a right to control what he has on/in/outside his car no matter what. This has been tested over and over and over. Employers tried to fire people for smoking even though they stood outside on their breaks in rain and snow 50 ft from the building and that didn't work either. Once you allow an employer to follow you outside the work place and scrutinize your choices it's beyond employment law, it's called harassment.

    • 2 years ago
  • NJDaryl
  • cerealforeal
  • FirstClassOnly
  • evoleon
    • 0
      evoleon  
    • People should be able to have whatever kind of message on their car, that they want. A business should not tell people how to live. I wouldn't care if I guy have in big letters on his car like "BEANER CRUSHER!" or "Illegal Immigrant Hunting License" I just laugh and go about my day. It's their property, they do with it what they want. I don't care if a guy came in buying tomatoes in a Nazi outfit, it would not bother me. Everyone needs to get a grip, this isn't high school anymore where you can whine until you get something done. That man has rights and clearly they were violated.

      Oh and for the people saying that the flag was for "hate" the issue was not with slavery it was really about state rights. They had agreed to free the slaves after the war. The government could have just bought the slaves from the slave owners and called it a day. Instead they choose a long and bloody war (costing many millions more dollars and thousands of lives). Just a making a statement to what will happen if the states try to appose federal rulings.

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • evoleon:

      I agree, we can not tell people what they are allowed to say or display. If we start doing that we will become just like China, which in previous posts and topics everybody has turned down.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sundance02008
  • kewal91
    • 0
      kewal91  
    • this is where managing skill comes in handy.. you dont tell them your firing them because they have a flag but because they have been late to work 5 days in a row.. or something obscure wand legit...

      this could have been ignored.. not a lot of people would have thrown a fit about it...

      ITs obviously his right to free speech.. he's case is sure to win.. even if the flag symbolizes hate for some people...

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
  • FirstClassOnly
    • 0
      FirstClassOnly  
    • kewal91:

      Kewal brings up a great point. That is absolutey correct. First thing we where tought in Management training was to ignore the obvious if it would create a problem and focus on secondary. (hint: walmart) They have that stuff down man! Good point Kewal.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • That flag is a terrible sign of times not that far in the past. He should use a jolly roger flag or something else. People who use this flag are at the least, ignorant of what it stands for and are just flaunting their ignorance when they use it.

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • kennymotown:

      So would a Nazi flag, or a "Get Slavery back" bumper sticker. Are you then saying that anything that other people might find offensive should be taken down? Define free speech to me pls ; )

    • 2 years ago
  • Robert_Adams
    • 0
      Robert_Adams  
    • kennymotown:

      ACTUALLY JERKWAD...THE FLAG STANDS FOR THE CIVIL WAR......WHICH CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF WAS FOUGHT OVER SOUTHERNERS CIVIL RIGHTS...NOT SLAVES CIVIL RIGHTS,DUH. KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE YOU SAY STUPID ASS THINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • Well, it was parked in the Employee parking lot, but regardless of that, I think he is still protected under the Freedom of Speech act. What would they if you had a bumper sticker that had a negative message? Or say a small Nazi flag draped over the rear view mirror? I get nervous when they start messing with free speech. We lost enough to W Bush in the last couple of years and we need to make sure to protect what little is left.

    • 2 years ago
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • ClipsFC:

      So if you owned a business and one of your employees had a Nazi Flag in the back window of their truck, you would have no problem with them parking in the employee section of your lot?

      Big difference between a company owned parking lot and your front lawn.

    • 2 years ago
  • TomJoad
    • 0
      TomJoad  
    • BJs has not violated anyone's freedom of speech. We must not forget that the man responsible for all of this controversy is a BJs employee. Thus he is subject to the discretion of his employer. Many BJs patrons may find the history and symbolism of the Confederate flag offensive. Therefore, the company is forced to create some sort of standard by which all employees must adhere to ensure the quality of the consumer's experience.
      Let's take South Carolina as an example. It was the last state in the Union to remove the Confederate flag from it's state house, and it continues to fly the "stars and bars" in front of the building to this day. I believe SC took the right approach to this issue, and one BJs attorneys might want to cite.
      Those interested in flying the Confederate flag should do so in memorial. That's what SC has done. Placed the flag directly behind the Confederate soldiers memorial in front of the state house. This may entail flying the flag on your personal property, or observing similar memorials. However, there is no place for such symbols or personal statements (the object of many whom fly the Confederate flag) at one's place of employment. This man needs to realize that the company's liable here, and he should respect the view and policies of his employer.

    • 2 years ago
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • TomJoad:

      You quote SC taking down the FLAG. We are not talking about the Flag, we are talking about his rights. Read the employers statement on their policy. What if they came to your house and told you that there are certain lawn ornaments they don't like in your town, would you lay down for that?

    • 2 years ago
  • Robert_Adams
    • 0
      Robert_Adams  
    • TomJoad:

      technically friend, the ""stars and bars" IS the CONFEDERATE FLAG. THE FLAG that has BEEN STEROTYPED AS THE "CONFEDERATE FLAG(THE X, WITH 13 STARS), IS THE NORTH VIRGINIA BATTLE FLAG. KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE YOU SAY STUPID THINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • hollowman218
    • 0
      hollowman218  
    • I think the confederate flag stands for a lot of things, both good and bad. But it doesn't matter, because free speech is protected no matter what it symbolizes. I personally think the guy should have been allowed to keep his flag up, but i understand how someone who sees that thing parked outside a BJ's might think it reflects the type of company BJ's is or their customer base.

    • 2 years ago
  • hjonnsters
    • 0
      hjonnsters  
    • And after the flag, what's next? If an employer doesn't agree with a certain lapel pin you wear? your color of your hair? (Say blue if you are into that) This is more about your rights as a citizen then it is about the flag. I realize that employers have certain rights to direct employees but when it comes to free speech and your right to express yourself by word or action there should be a very restricted limit on what employers can do.

    • 2 years ago
  • allIknowis
  • LisaVlad
    • 0
      LisaVlad  
    • hjonnsters:

      Good answer, ok I get that part. The part that still troubles me is that the flag is on his car in a parking lot, does the employers rights extend to his belongings such as car? I know in NJ an employer was sued because he claimed that employees where not allowed to smoke even on their break outside the building. They won the case because it was clearly stated that 20ft from the building and they where on break.

    • 2 years ago
  • JSmith44
  • animallovers018
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • ok, we may all agree with what the flag stands for ..(?) but, the bigger question raised is the Freedom of Speech and if BJ's violated that. Does this mean if I hang a certain flag outside my house the rest of the community can file petitions with the town to make me take it down?

    • 2 years ago
  • TomJoad
    • 0
      TomJoad  
    • ClipsFC:

      BJs has not violated anyone's freedom of speech. We must not forget that the man responsible for all of this controversy is a BJs employee. Thus he is subject to the discretion of his employer. Many BJs patrons may find the history and symbolism of the Confederate flag offensive. Therefore, the company is forced to create some sort of standard by which all employees must adhere to ensure the quality of the consumer's experience.
      Let's take South Carolina as an example. It was the last state in the Union to remove the Confederate flag from it's state house, and it continues to fly the "stars and bars" in front of the building to this day. I believe SC took the right approach to this issue, and one BJs attorneys might want to cite.
      Those interested in flying the Confederate flag should do so in memorial. That's what SC has done. Placed the flag directly behind the Confederate soldiers memorial in front of the state house. This may entail flying the flag on your personal property, or observing similar memorials. However, there is no place for such symbols or personal statements (the object of many whom fly the Confederate flag) at one's place of employment. This man needs to realize that the company's liable here, and he should respect the view and policies of his employer.

    • 2 years ago
  • loustriker
    • 0
      loustriker  
    • You guys can rationalize it all you want. Call it rebellion, and justice, blah blah blah.

      The Confederacy still stands as a symbol of the last bastion of slavery in the modern world.

      And people fly that flag because the South has never been able to lift itself out of the depressed economy that resulted in slavery being taken away.

      People feel nostalgic for the "good old days." They're not celebrating liberty.

    • 2 years ago
  • hjonnsters
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • loustriker:

      I completely agree with the message that the flag sends and your post. But I also agree that this goes beyond the message, I don't like the fact that they prohibited him to display the flag on his car. It's his property, he is parked in an employee parking lot, not even in front of the store (Which for all I care he could had a right to do)

    • 2 years ago
  • firedaisy
    • 0
      firedaisy  
    • loustriker:

      "Last bastion of slavery in the modern world"

      Get a clue, slavery is in every modern world actually including our own. The reason The Confederacy has such bad press is because of suppression of the states rights issue. Just say no to one world government and statism

    • 2 years ago
  • sickinjersey
  • TheEmpireGuy
  • TheEmpireGuy
  • ClipsFC
    • 0
      ClipsFC  
    • "While the policy does not identify any specific type of expression, it generally prohibits expression that is rude, abusive, hostile or intimidating."
      Displaying a flag falls under which one of these policies? Rude? Abusive? Hostile or intimidating?
      Civil Liberty Union must be loving this!

    • 2 years ago
  • ssnigg
    • 0
      ssnigg  
    • ClipsFC:

      CLU is busy defending octopussy mom. They are worthless as of late. Read the stuff on their site and see what they take on these days .. all stupid crap.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos