Community | April 10, 2009 | 27 comments

obamas New World Order

source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13133

Image
Ihatethemall
This article addresses Washington's financial coup d'etat in the context of discussing Michael Hudson's important, very lengthy and detailed April 5 Global Research.ca one titled: "The Financial War Against Iceland - Being defeated by debt is as deadly as outright military warfare." It reviews its key information in advance of Hudson's April 14 scheduled appearance on The Global Research News Hour to discuss.

What's true for Iceland holds everywhere, including the developed world, the idea being to enrich finance capitalism through state-sponsored debt bondage and neo-feudal impoverishment. The global economic crisis was no accident. It was long ago hatched, and has been brewing for years, gestating, percolating, then bubbling into the 2000 tech crash, a mere prelude for today's greater one spreading everywhere like a cancer but hitting the developing world and most indebted nations hardest.

Hudson: "Iceland is under attack - not militarily but financially."

Like many others, "It owes more than it can pay" and is bankrupt. It was planned that way, and the idea is to strip-mine the nation and its people of their resources, enterprises, assets, land, homes, jobs and futures through perpetual debt bondage. Bankers get enriched. Nations and people, however, are discarded like trash, with the IMF as enforcer, to be reinvigorated with an additional (G 20-pledged) $750 billion, quadrupling its resources to $1 trillion if fulfilled.

Wall Street and Western European bankers planned it and now ordered the government "to sell off the nation's public domain, its natural resources and public enterprises to pay (its) financial gambling debts." Also, raise permanent taxes at the worst possible time, then suck the maximum wealth from the country leaving behind an empty hulk and impoverished, desparate population. It's called dystopia Merriam-Webster defines as: "an imaginary place where people lead dehumanized and often fearful lives," the opposite of utopia under conditions of deprivation, poverty, disease, violence, oppression, and terror, much like in Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Permanent debt bondage "is as deadly as outright military" defeat. Loss of livelihoods and assets leave people vulnerable to sickness, despair, and early deaths, much like what happened to post-Soviet Russia under Washington-imposed "shock therapy:"

-- 80% of farmers went bankrupt;

-- around 70,000 state factories closed;

-- unemployment became epidemic;

-- a permanent underclass was created;

-- poverty rose from two million in 1989 to 74 million by the mid-1990s, and in half the cases it was desperate;

-- alcoholism and drug abuse soared;

-- so did HIV/AIDS 20-fold;

-- suicides also and violent crime four-fold; and
-- the population declined by 700,000 a year; by 2007 it was 10% lower than in 1989 because of sharply reduced life expectancies.

Iceland, the developing world, and the West take note. This cancer is heading everywhere, courtesy of banker-imposed diktats, mainly from America and the UK. They insist Iceland "impoverish its citizens by paying debts in ways (they'd) never follow" even though the government has no way to do it.

No matter. "They are quite willing to take payment in the form of foreclosure on the nation's natural resources, land and housing, and a mortgage on the next few centuries of its future" - perpetual debt bondage no different than the spoils of war under permanent occupation.

However, in this case, debtors are convinced to pay voluntarily "to put creditor interests above the economy's prosperity (and) national interest." Their indebtedness comes at a huge cost - "chronic currency depreciation (and) domestic price inflation for many decades to come."
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   WTF,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News,  News and Politics,  Politics,  WTF,  4 more
  3.     
    |

27 comments // obamas New World Order

  • cybexg
    • 0
      cybexg  

    • "the idea is to strip-mine the nation and its people of their resources, enterprises, assets, land, homes, jobs and futures through perpetual debt bondage."

      ah...Iceland isn't wealthy enough nor blessed w/ enough raw materials to make such an action worthwhile.

    • 2 years ago
  • el_chivo
    • 0
      el_chivo  

    • I don’t believe in NWO, I think is a childish idea that behind all the intrigues of the world is a mastermind planning it all, the mastermind we can blame all.

      No, I think is worse than that, I think that everyone is just acting by his own interest, taking his piece without caring about the others, ripping the stability of society. And there’s no one to blame, everyone is guilty and there’s no plan and there’s no way to stop it.

    • 2 years ago
  • estee_arie
  • carmalite
    • 0
      carmalite  

    • Obama's new world order. Duh? Recall George Herbert Walker Bush or Bush no. 1 invented this phrase, and the idea was hatched by Ronald the Reagan.

      And our wonderful Bill Clinton accepted it and did not veto NAFTA and GW Bush enacted 14 (fourteen) new free trade agreements. Why are all the jobs leaving or being insourced with HB 2 visas. Look at the 3 presidents above. You may not like Obama but this is not his babe.

      Thank Ronald for the idea, Bush for pushing, the Republicans who were in majority for putting NAFTA our there, and Bill the Clinton for not vetoing it.

      Its alreadyi in the works and the world aristocracy is driving the car and running over anyone who is not one of them.
      It would take a Teddy Roosevelt, or FDR and a Legislature who agrees with them to change the trajectory. All the Republicans like the idea and about 40 percent of the Democrates feel obligated to go along. So we are in trouble and its the majority of us who will lose.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  

    • I am not trying to say in a way shape or form that obama started the NWO. He doesnt have the smarts to hatch a plan so devilish, not to mention that it started before he was even born. I'm just saying he is continuing the work for the powers that be like almost every president in the last 75 years or so has, the one exception maybe being Kennedy, and all the ones that will follow unless something major changes.

    • 2 years ago
  • Wang111
    • Wang111  
    • This comment was removed by its owner.
  • montesooma
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • Wang111:

      Wang is wacked. He puts stupid shit about racists all the time. I have learned to just ignore his bullshit.

      He has to figure out for himself that obama being a socialist that works for the NWO has nothing whatsoever to do with his color. he would be a puppet for the powers that be just the same no matter what color he was.

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
    • 0
      montesooma  

    • yeh but that all happened at the g20, they all agreed that their should be an international body to oversee banks and financial matters. ---yes this is happening.
      Those who deny it just do so because they taken in by obama's suave'
      i could take pleasure in saying i told you so, but it hurts too bad to see what is happening -- i want to cry instead.

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  

    • Bankers simply don't have enough imagination to think that many moves ahead. I can't claim to be an expert on international relations (and didn't even spend last night at a Holiday Inn Express) but what I HAVE seen is that just getting negotiations through the European UNION is an incredibly painful and time-consuming process because of all of the suspicion, distrust and outright hatred that exists between the representatives of various member-countries.

      Trying to add countries like the U.S. (which is hated AND distrusted by just about everybody in ANY room of international representatives) and Russia (which nobody has EVER liked) to this mixture would be at best unlikely. Adding China (which finds most other nations to be beneath their contempt and which plans on dominating the world by itself -- without partners -- in a century or two anyway would be laughable.

      The other major problem is that within each individual member country of the so-called new world order countries are two or more powerful political parties whose members essentially loathe the members of the other party (ies) in that country. So this vast New World Order conspiracy has to be sufficiently flexible that it includes not just Barrack Obama but also included George W. Bush (unless the NWO just goes on hiatus when the wrong party holds the White House), two men who find each other contemptible.

      If I am wrong I owe you all an apology for being so foolish. But I am not wrong on this one (for a change). The problem is not that there aren't people who would like to see a new world order -- I am quite certain there ARE such people. The problem is that we no longer live in a world of absolute monarchies in which Britain, France and Spain could agree on something, for example, if their three kings agreed. If Obama tried to bring the U.S. into a New World Order he would be impeached before the week was out.

      But have fun scaring yourselves. We can all gather in the graveyard tonight to tell ghost stories and roast weenies if you need more of this...

    • 2 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • cztheday:

      Please bear in mind that I'm not a subscriber to the "conspiracy theory" view. That being said, I have, over the last 18 years, had the pleasure of personally chatting over tables with some of the folks who keep the Bilderburg tradition alive and in defense of their mental capacity they are in fact quite a brilliant lot. They also do in fact have a very long term and far reaching plan which absolutely does span the globe in it's ambitions. Again, bearing in mind that I'm not a subscriber to the whole "conspiracy theory" thing; Even so, I have also had the pleasure to have had some, albeit limited, association with several of the more highly placed individuals who make up a portion of the membership of the TC over several years and they too are not people I would characterize as dim by any measure. They too have a very long term outlook on the planet. My previous place of residence also afforded me opportunities to make direct and personal contact and have casual chit chat with principals in such illustrious organizations as the IMF and the WB (No, not Warner Brothers, but yes, them too.) and coincidentally they and the other various groups the involved persons with whom I've had direct and personal contact with in fairly casual circumstances all associate with each other and are, not surprisingly well informed of each others respective "organizations" plans and projects. However don't get the idea that I hold to any "conspiracy theories" in the common sense of how the term is bandied about and regularly trivialized. I don't believe in them.

      Addendum: Add to the list the tight-lipped Forstmann-Little attendees. Now THERE'S an interesting subset of all of the above and more. Very nice folks too. Believe it or not many of those who will be in some position of influence when the NWO really gets up and running as they are in now are disarmingly altruistic at heart.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • cztheday:

      B,

      Okay, I will bear all of that in mind. But of course there are many, many groups who have a long-term vision of how the world should look. Two that spring immediately to mind are the Catholic Church and the Church of Latter Day Saints. They both command massive resources that are largely hidden from the public eye. But the chances that their visions of the future are consistent approach zero.

      And therein lies the problem. Each group is certain that its particular vision is the correct one, and most are more than willing to engage in conflict of one kind or another to see their vision be the ascendant one.

      Certainly two or three or perhaps even a half dozen may find ways of allying with each other. But the natures of power and the people who lust for it invariable break such alliances apart. At this particular moment in history there are simply way too many wildcards in the deck for any group to impose a world order.

      Again, one example is sufficient to illustrate this point. India and Pakistan are essentially engaged in a low-level war at all times, though the physical clash of armies only seems to occur once each decade or so. They are now both armed with nuclear weapons and just BARELY restrained from annihilating each other. The odds of both of them agreeing to being governed by the same "entity" are so small as to be essentially nil. And if ONE of them agrees, the other is going to go apeshit. And of course, there is no way to FORCE either of them to join a new order or cooperate with one. If you are as well-informed as you indicate, I am confident you could list another dozen countries in similar circumstances if given 5 minutes to think about it.

      Is a new world order possible someday in the deep, dark, distant future? Sure. But it won't happen during THIS century, so I am not particularly inclined to respond to the "wake-up call" on this particular threat when there are dozens of others that are much more imminent.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • cztheday:

      Well CZ,

      I guess I'm not entirely clear in my presentation. The thing is I'm not feeling the least bit threatened by any of this as I have a clear sight as to where it's ultimately heading. The real threats are as you say more immediate. My original reply at the beginning of this contribution contained a hint of urgency as In the view I have we are still not at a point where great changes for the better can't be affected while simultaneously avoiding a particular catastrophe. That particular catastrophe is reflected somewhat in your scenario concerning India and Pakistan and is just around the corner from where we are now though to most people it appears far off in the distance. "Objects up ahead may be closer than they appear" to paraphrase the mirror warning. The difficulty lies in the fact that to avoid said catastrophe it will require a fundamental shift in paradigm of a large percentage (at least) of the entire planetary population in regard to such core issues as religion(s) and God. It's more a matter of two paths leading to the same place, that place being ultimately a true Utopian vision of human society over the entire planet. One path is brutal, harsh, violent, and results in many casualties to as much as 2/3 of the planet's population being violently wiped out with the remaining third being severely smacked around but surviving very thankfully and much wiser for it. The alternative path is much gentler and far less destructive but in implementation actually far more difficult and requiring much greater strength of character from every individual person on earth. That choice is what's facing us right now in these times. It's far later than is commonly thought. The gentle path to that utopian world order is contained within and outlined by and given administrative form through the writings of Baha'u'llah and the link I posted at the beginning is an introduction to that path to our collective future. This is a choice which has been facing humanity in part through it's leaders since 1844 in this final round of opportunities being presented to us by God. If a person doesn't believe in God then their choice has been made and so be it, that's of no concern to me. There's simply no discussion to entertain if one has no belief in God.

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • cztheday:

      B,

      Of the two scenarios you describe, I find the one in which most of humanity gets killed off and the remainder "smacked around" to be far and away the most likely. In fact, my guess (and of course it is only a guess) is that the poor people trapped in the middle of that time period will see it almost like a series of "rolling blackouts" in the sense that bad news will pile on bad news. My GUESS (note that word again) is that the enormous pressures resulting from a combination of climate change (food shortages, population displacement, inadequate fresh water, MASSIVE refugee camps, etc) and scarcity of fossil fuels (because there is simply NO WAY sufficient substitutes will be discovered and implemented in time to avert catastrophe at this point) will push the countries that have either nuclear weapons or at least some of the nastier pathogens to the very brink of collapse and beyond.

      At that point, they will being preying on their neighbors for food, medicine, fresh water, whatever... Most if not all of those neighbors will be in pretty tough circumstances themselves and will refuse. When the radiation, toxins, and killer bugs start floating around the globe, people already weakened from inadequate food, water and medical care -- along with the very old and the very young -- will begin dying in large numbers even if they are not directly in the path of the conflict(s).

      I take no pleasure in saying so, but I suspect you are being generous when you estimate that a third will live through this. Nor do I believe that the survivors will necessarily be wiser. They will be struggling to survive, and that will take pretty much all of their time. But humans are what they are, so some segment will decide to TAKE what they want instead of working for it or even asking for it and the cycle will continue.

      As for the possibility of utopia, that is so incredibly unlikely as to be lost when rounding the probability numbers. Too much of the planet is covered by societies who see little or no value in providing a decent education or freedom of the press to all of their people. Getting people to understand the distinctions and subtleties they would need to understand to get all of us moving together is almost so hopeless as to make one want to give up entirely -- ALMOST. While there is life, there is always a glimmer of hope. And where there is hope, there is a reason to work.

    • 2 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • cztheday:

      CZ,

      The distinction between the bleak outlook you describe and the scenario that is currently unfolding is simply that we (Bahai's Under the Provisions of the Covenant) have seen it proven beyond any doubt that God actually is in control and does have a plan which is being intentionally fulfilled in a very specifically predicted series of events.

      The fact of the plan of God and it's fulfillment in this day is very different from the human conceptions of the future even considering that it includes the possibility (depending upon the choices humanity makes) of a global thermonuclear war among other catastrophes.

      People stubbornly refuse to give rational consideration to religious texts. This is understandable considering that nearly everything the people in general have been told ABOUT their espoused religion by the universally corrupt clergy of all faiths is utter nonsense and outright lies and there is not enough space in a thousand pages to document the crimes against humanity, nature and God that have been committed using such false beliefs in all religions as justification. The keyword here is ABOUT.

      The only path out of this dilemma is to turn to God and His Actual Plan which is very specific and well laid out before humanity, even to the point of being written down in ink on paper by the very one who was sent to reveal it to all of humanity for this era between the years of 1844 and 1921. This is not speculative in it's origin or it's authorship.

      As long as the general consensus is that a global thermonuclear war is categorically unsurvivable or at best not worth being alive in the aftermath of, then hopelessness will reign in the collective subconscious and any message of real hope will fall on deaf ears or be railed against with even violent opposition as is frequently the case. That in fact is to the advantage of those who seek to cull the population and gain absolute hegemonic world domination. Those who see that path to power for themselves both great and small will stop at nothing to suppress and if possible erase all traces of the truth so that those who would actually seek it out and implement it will fail to do either. This is the reality of the facts on the ground in this struggle.

      The purpose here isn't to have anyone just nod along in agreement with us. The purpose is to encourage individuals to investigate thoroughly what Baha'u'llah put forward and judge for themselves without blindly rejecting it OR blindly accepting it. Hence the links I post as often as is meet.

      Even given the short time left, there is still time for enough to do this, largely due to the presence of the internet, (a development which in itself was predicted over 5000 years ago), and if enough will judge fairly and see the truth of Baha'u'llah's Revelation and act upon it, the worst human scenarios can yet be curtailed or at least mitigated somewhat. Anyone who judges fairly in their assessment of Baha'u'llah's Revelation will be able to understand what action to take. That is not for any one person to tell another.

    • 2 years ago
  • JSmith44
  • carmalite
    • 0
      carmalite  

    • Bahai, Senator Sanders was on the Thom Harrmann show and he was saying that the people who really caused this disaster to come about are not enormous in number and he wants to have an investigation into who did it.
      He and Grassley are the only ones who seem to think that this was intentional.

    • 2 years ago
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Image
    • carmalite:

      Well "carmalite", it's intentional but not in the same way as a definite conspiracy is.

      This is what we call institutionalized corruption. It isn't the result of a few people or groups of people getting together and deciding to accomplish a specific end goal, it's a much more widespread human tendency toward short term self interests without regard to short term or long term consequences.

      Whether people want to believe it or not we act as a collective species on a subconscious level and human civilization tracks along globally in a general direction over the long term.

      This NWO thing is just the HARD ROAD to the Utopian future. The EASY PATH into the World Order of Baha'u'llah which the Bible calls the Kingdom of God, has been rejected by the world leaders for generations and they were and currently are all informed of it and the One who wrote it down for them on paper but choose to reject Him and try it their way for their own self interests. Because of this they keep the people they "lead" out of the Kingdom of God and drag the world into a thermonuclear holocaust and a brutal, materialistic, totalitarian, world superstate of their own design.

      The link in this reply takes you to a downloadable PDF which is an indictment of all the various powers and influences that have been responsible for the present state of the world.

    • 2 years ago
  • pjacobs51
    • 0
      pjacobs51  

    • The cancer is here and has been for some time now. Just look at the paradigm shift in the last 50 years from a savings account to a debt account. We have been programmed to consume, to consume more than we can pay for (enter the credit card). We are all victims of "debt bondage." And now we are seeing this cancer, not just consuming people, but nations.

      But like Ayahuasca and jh64487,, I don't see how this is Obamas NWO.

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
  • Ayahuasca2012
    • 0
      Ayahuasca2012  

    • I fail to see how this is Obama's New World Order. Last I checked he just stepped into office a couple months ago and no one had really heard of him until a year or two ago...

      While I believe that there is something sinister afoot and that the banks, their owners and the federal reserve are our worst enemies I'm sure that Obama wasn't sitting in the shadows this whole time waiting to emerge and take control when the time was right.

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
  • jubal
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  

    • the crash was caused by lack of oversight. obama is trying to fix that. he can only do so much so fast. literally, less than 100 days still.

      iceland has few if any natural resources. that was their real problem.

      if it's both American and European banks...and apparently chinese as their the ones calling for a new global currency...how is it obama's NWO?

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
  • Bahai144
    • 0
      Bahai144  
    • Image

    • Here is the true alternative to this man made NWO. The harsh reality is that because nobody wants the plan given by God as explained in the link above, they will choose by default the one outlined in this article. WAKE UP PEOPLE, before it's too late. There is still time to ease the transition from this NWO to the WOB.

    • 2 years ago
  • tome_erau
  • Bahai144
more from Community:
from the community

top videos