Concerns Abput Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus
source: http://www.infowars.com/concerns-about-chemtrails-given-fresh-impetus/
-
-
- TheEmpireGuy
- added this
Chemtrails differ from ordinary contrails in that they hang in the sky for hours and are often observed to be emitted from planes that fly criss-cross routes, leading to the formation of ‘X’ and grid-like patterns in the sky. Chemtrails also directly effect localized weather by turning a clear blue sky into a hazy overcast.
Last year, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature. The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.”
KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure problems.” The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails.
Indeed, barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant from suspected geoengineering experimentation.
KSLA also put aerosolized-chemical testing in its historical context, citing a voluminous number of unclassified tests exposed in 1977 Senate hearings. The tests included experimenting with biochemical compounds on the public. KSLA reports that “239 populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.”
The announcement this week that the Obama administration has held discussions regarding the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming by “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays” has stoke fresh concerns that similar programs are already underway, and that chemtrails are directly connected to such experimentation.
Indeed, as we covered in previous article, numerous universities and government agencies have been conducting studies in this field for years.
In addition, the Obama administration’s interest in exploring “geo-engineering” mirrors recent publications penned by the elite Council On Foreign Relations.
In a document entitled Geo-engineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geo0engineering, the CFR proposes different methods of “reflecting sunlight back into space,” which include adding “small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere,” adding “more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere,” and placing “various kinds of reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and the sun.”
The proposals in the CFR document match exactly the atmospheric effects observed in the aftermath of chemtrail spraying.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Humanity would seem to be nothing more than guinea pigs to our authoritative figures...truly sad.
Tyrants have ruled since JFK.
Should we put it past our government to even do such things to it's citizens?
-
-
stars15k
-
I saw big errors in the KSLA report the first time I saw it on YouTube. After seeing the report reposted many times in any week, without the errors being mentioned, I wrote the reporter, Jeff Ferrell. He admits to the errors and knows the report is wrong. A correction was done, but has been lost apparently. I have since seen this same report used in 46 of the first 100 references when I googled "barium in chemtrails". There is something seriously wrong when a report with such obvious errors is used as a basis for a truth, and is believed to be "fact". There are three big errors:
1) The sampling was done without accounting for any ground level contamination. Because anything in aerosol form released high in the atmosphere will remain suspended for hours or days and drift with the wind for miles, ground level testing cannot be used. It would make the "chemtrail" theory a hit and miss random event, not a targeted assault as it seems to be considered. Any chemical found on the ground cannot be traced to any plane flying over head until wind can be controlled.
2) The second mistake is the most obvious. The reporter clearly states "6.8" but is pointing to the lab result "68.8". That's ten times greater than is stated. Why has that not been addressed? I would think that chemtrail promoters would be jumping all over that mistake.
3) Possibly why they ignore the 10 times mistake above. The reporter says that the unit used in the test is "parts per million". The report clearly shows "ug/L". The letter "u" is used instead of the more proper "µ', the Greek letter "mu". "Mu" means billions. The test is in parts per BILLION, which is off by a factor of 1000. The actual amount of barium is well below both background and toxic levels.
These are errors large enough to make the report invalid for use as a source, yet it continues to be used. A theory that relies on flawed information has no basis in fact or truth. - 2 years ago
-
stars15k