Community | April 18, 2009 | 94 comments

U.S. to Boycott U.N. Racism Conference - WSJ.com

Image
pressrecord
I guess it's more important to pander to Zionists than to truthfully confront racism in the international arena. Seriously, this whole article is bothersome in several levels.

"Despite the decision, (Obama) stressed that the United States 'is profoundly committed to ending racism and racial discrimination' and 'will work with all people and nations to build greater resolve and enduring political will to halt racism and discrimination wherever it occurs.'"

Unless, it's Israel.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   US Politics
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Current TV Obama 2 more
  3.     
    |

94 comments // U.S. to Boycott U.N. Racism Conference - WSJ.com

  • mookster_07
    • 0
      mookster_07  
    • I dont believe that this is the US refusing to discuss racism, it appears much more to me that the US is avoiding using what should be a discussion on racism as a political jump-off for other crap. Read the full articles, not just the highlighted blurbs and understand that their is more of a political agenda than meets the eye.

      Not to mention, these politicians don't want to share a venue with a hate-mongering ahmadenejad.

    • 3 years ago
  • Eldridge
    • 0
      Eldridge  
    • Anyone else having a bad time on committing about Israel or Obama. Current says my remarks are bigoted and won't show them. I don't think there bigoted nor would anyone else that isn't censored by the parties I talked about. But I guess no one will ever know now. Current your true agenda is starting to show.

    • 3 years ago
  • illumin8
    • 0
      illumin8  
    • a photo-shopped flag behind an emotional angle photo?
      "zionists?"
      "as long as its Israel?
      Manipulative half truth phrasing?
      You remind me of prewar germany. self righteous in your hatred and manipulation of the truth.
      This is no anti racism summit.
      It is an attempt to manipulate other countries into a specific political agenda. The fact that Obama is refusing to be manipulated like a puppet by an agenda is not only suprising, but encouraging.

    • 3 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • Ha - what a bunch of haters here - pathetic!!! It's all the Jew's fault - that you are dumb, hungry, jobless and depressed. It's all a HUUUUGE conspiracy by the Jew. Most posters here must be Arab and/or mindless antisemites - highroller had damned spammed the entire blog with his shit. BTW - he always jumps on the Jew-Hating bandwagon - that arab has a history of this on current!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • philomar
  • payamc
    • 0
      payamc  
    • I don't think this description is accurate of what the article is saying at all. It's completely spinning the article to be anti-Israel.

    • 3 years ago
  • capt_ayhab
    • 0
      capt_ayhab  
    • http://www.albionmonitor.com/0605a/iranmisquote.html

      EXCERPTS:

      It turns out that Ahmadinejad never said what is being routinely attributed to him. Juan Cole, a professor of Middle Eastern studies at University of Michigan who reads Persian, explains that he actually stated (quoting the late Ayatollah Khomeini): "The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] from the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)."

      [How would it sound if Bush kept repeating: "The Iranian president has quoted Ayatollah Khomeini, who died seventeen years ago, as saying 'the occupation regime over Jerusalem must be erased from the page of time?'" Pretty lame, huh? Or if he were to say, "In ten years, Iran might be able to build a nuclear weapon to use against Israel, which itself has had a couple hundred nukes for quite awhile?" Pretty lame, too. You can be sure that employees in the current incarnation of the Office of Special Plans aren't being paid to churn out that kind of stuff. They're paid to produce effective propaganda to justify the planned attack on Iran. ]

    • 3 years ago
  • capt_ayhab
    • 0
      capt_ayhab  
    • I speak Farsi and No Ahmadinejad did not say it. What he said was that ZIONIST[and not Israel] will be gone form pages of history just like communism and Soviet Union disappeared from pages of history.
      It is total misrepresentation and mis-translation of the truth. There are 25,000 Jews living in Iran second biggest Jewish community in ME next to Israel. They have lived there for 1000's of years and they are as much of a proud Iranians as they are proud Jews.

      People please do not fall for AIPAC ugly and deceitful propaganda. And as for Netherlands, it is enough to say that their PM is one of the ugliest anti human anti Islam ever existed and when he came to US, only Faux and trash organization like such gave him the platform to spew his hat. He is no better than KKK.

    • 3 years ago
  • capt_ayhab
    • 0
      capt_ayhab  
    • How are we going to support human rights when we so blatantly siding with one of the most racist regimes in the world today.
      Israels total disregard to plight of Palestinians and their racist and ethic cleansing policies in past 60 years is one of the darkest times of man kinds history. Supporting Israel in this manner make us accessory to the crimes committed by Israel. Not to mention the fact that all the killings been committed by the arms we have GIVEN them, for alleged self defense. Self defense against unarmed women and children!
      Mr. President, is this the change your were referring to?

    • 3 years ago
  • MiguelSanchez
  • joshthekilla
  • Mymicz1
    • 0
      Mymicz1 [removed]  
    • Islamic nations want to dish it out to Israel while not even admitting they have some of the worst Human Rights records in HISTORY. And it's not just Islamic nations really, they are all guilty. From Zimbabwe to Mogadishu to Siberia, to Denmark, to Texas, guilty, guilty, guilty. It's a farce. I am glad Obama is a real mench.

      How about we start with a text, we are all GUILTY of misunderstanding each other based upon racial assumptions. We should ALL stop. End.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mymicz1
    • 0
      Mymicz1 [removed]  
    • The "BLACK" guy is from Chicago politics, where Jews and Africans get along pretty well. The "Black" guy also knows that a draft which refers to a semtic peoples as foreign occupiers in a land historically (forget religion) indigenous to them (check the genetics) is pure bullshit. The black guy also knows Israelis take in AFRICAN refugees and the Israelis do a lot for a lot of people. The relationship with the US is not all about the take, there is a lot of give. And maybe what you're missing in what you pointed out was a reference to an actual genocide, mmm maybe against black people in Sudan. Maybe pointing out that Islam has severe sexist and extreme racist tendencies as well. But this would be impossible, because that is Islamophobia now. I wonder what India has to say about all of this Islamophobia talk. Anyone?

    • 3 years ago
  • Maeveeo
    • 0
      Maeveeo  
    • What does it matter , good o mother earth will keep on turning & will do away with all
      if this kiddie shit , nobody wants you to live your life
      your way without Getting mad or saying something about the way that you live ,,,,,,GUYS GET REAL . I bet that if some strange thing were to do the planet in would all this even matter ??????? then lets act like it !

    • 3 years ago
  • petarro
    • 0
      petarro  
    • Highr0ller, could you please stop the spam? Seriously!

      Its incredible how people are clearly paying their way and give in to the Islamic Propaganda. People expect hate on Jews, but this is ridiculous.

      Well done for the Boycott.

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
  • AngloZombie
    • 0
      AngloZombie  
    • If he did decide to go to the conference instead, we would have people accusing him of religious intolerance. Israel does quite the amount of monstrous, horrible, things but they are one of or only allies in the region and we do have to take into consideration of how they feel. We also have to realize that we don't have to do what they say, and in this case i thought we should of gone anyway. It is hard to defend against someone not going to a anti-racism convention, it is a pretty messed up.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • AngloZombie:

      Americas allies in the region are Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and the UAE. Do you realize that Saudi Arabia is America's biggest trading partner in the Middle East. I attended an evening at the American Embassy in Riyadh and I was shocked at the level of "special partnership" rhetoric and the emphasis on the "special relationship" between the two countries. Chas Freeman was the American Ambassador speaking.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ragan
    • 0
      Ragan  
    • This whole affair is a big farce from this administration. Obama does'nt want to look back and he thinks he can repair the damage from the Bush administration merely be shoving it under the carpet and forget about it. It wont work. Torture and all of the acts of the Bush years are becoming a precedent and will last forever. No matter how much good he does, no one will ever trust America until he faces the facts and corrects the arrogance of the Bush administration. At the end of four years he may find that he is just another Bush politician and perhaps he is protected by the star of David, he should be under the protection of the Americans. I a sense of loss for this nation. It has been neaten up for the past 150 years and there is no sign of a letup. Corruption has brought down every other empire to date and it may very well be our time. Racism is only a small part of our problem and since it is within only invasive surgury can get at the matter. Israel has been running rampant with corruption for a long time and it is fitting that we join them and make it a more powerful corrupt state of affairs after all 2+2=double. Will it be possible for the States to join together and bring Washington to its knees? We need some accountability and where will it come from?We are a corrupt republic supporting other corrupt republics. We once installed and supported Dictators all over the world and we have the guts to talk about racism and evil empires.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • It's a no win situation for Obama. If he attends, he distances himself from the right. If he doesn't, he distances himself from the left.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • I just downloaded and started reading the resolutions for the UN WCR. I haven't read the whole thing yet but I queried "Islam" and "Israel" and got the following results.

      61. We recognize with deep concern the increase in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia
      in various parts of the world, as well as the emergence of racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas against Jewish, Muslim and Arab communities;

      63. We are concerned about the plight of the Palestinian people under foreign
      occupation. We recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination
      and to the establishment of an independent State and we recognize the right to security for all
      States in the region, including Israel, and call upon all States to support the peace process and
      bring it to an early conclusion;

      64. We call for a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region in which all
      peoples shall co-exist and enjoy equality, justice and internationally recognized human rights,
      and security;

      150. Calls upon States, in opposing all forms of racism, to recognize the need to
      counter anti-Semitism, anti-Arabism and Islamophobia world-wide, and urges all States to take
      effective measures to prevent the emergence of movements based on racism and discriminatory
      ideas concerning these communities;

      151. As for the situation in the Middle East, calls for the end of violence and the swift
      resumption of negotiations, respect for international human rights and humanitarian law, respect
      for the principle of self-determination and the end of all suffering, thus allowing Israel and the
      Palestinians to resume the peace process, and to develop and prosper in security and freedom;

      It sounds about right to how I want things resolved for my own concern but I wonder how the language above warrant boycott?

    • 3 years ago
  • Mymicz1
    • 0
      Mymicz1 [removed]  
    • pressrecord:

      "We are concerned about the plight of the Palestinian people under foreign
      occupation." Tell me please exactly how does a genetically "semitic" people with roots and indisputable historical artifacts in a region that are 5,000 plus years old and include Muslim holy sites count as a foreign occupier???

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • pressrecord:

      because the military occupation is not by 5,000 year old people. jews and arabs both have their roots in that part of the world. settling jews migrated from places like russia and the united states and the israeli government used systematic and military violence on the indigenous population to covet the land using the same justification you just gave.

      isn't there something fundamentally wrong with claiming rights to land and luxury because of race? to say, "this is my land because i'm a jew and god gave it to me" is pure nonsense.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • Image
    • the UN World Conference on Racism site link is here and the Programme of Action language of concern can be found, along with the Rules of Procedure, in the Documents section.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mymicz1
  • Valence
  • mohsint06
  • Highr0ller
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued

      The military maneuvers will focus on countering possible retaliatory rockets launched from Iranian soil in the event the Israeli plans to strike the country are put into action.

      In his letter, Khazaee said, "Officials of the Zionist regime [Israel] have repeatedly threatened to resort to violence against the Islamic Republic. These threats, blatant violations of international law and the UN Charter, are repeated with inaction on behalf of the Security Council."

      According to the Iranian UN ambassador, the lack of UN action against Israeli echelons that see justification in carrying out "criminal and terrorist acts" against independent countries only emboldens Tel Aviv.
      Related Posts by Categories

      Israeli Terrorism
      Many Palestinian Kids in Gaza left orphaned after Murderous Israel's War
      Report on the Abu Halima family in Beit Lahiya
      LIVE FROM GAZA ~~IDEAL ISRAELI SOLDIERS; NOT ONLY KILLERS BUT THIEVES
      Deir Yassin Remembered
      Israel's Gaza "Terror"
      Israel created 'terror without mercy' in Gaza
      Gaza war crimes: Drone plane kills civilians, Cut to pieces: The family drinking tea in a courtyard Pt1
      Over 600 Gaza Patients need Help Now!
      Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan addresses the European Community in Oxford
      American Lawyers in Gaza: Evidence That Israel Violated International Law,

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • "Veto! Veto! VETO!" -- Official White Horse Source

      Iran takes Israeli war threats up with UN Iran questions years of UN Security Council inaction in the face of Israeli threats against UN member states.

      Iran has condemned the latest Israeli threats to "strike" Iran as Tel Aviv releases news of its biggest ever joint war games with the US.

      In a letter to the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council, Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee urged the body to exercise its power and put an immediate stop to what he called "unlawful and insolent" Israeli threats against UN member states.

      Israeli President Shimon Peres launched into a tirade against Tehran in an interview this week with Kol Hai Radio and threatened Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

      He said if the Iranian president does not act during speculated talks with the US to soften his stance, "we'll strike him."

      Peres also confirmed that Tel Aviv "will" launch its much-predicted military strike against Iran, should the alleged overtures sought by Israel's staunch ally Washington fail to force an end to uranium enrichment in Iran.

      The Israeli president refused to reveal details of the military plan to take out Iran's nuclear infrastructure, but confirmed that Israel would not launch a unilateral strike against the country.

      "We certainly cannot go it alone, without the US, and we definitely can't go against the US. This would be unnecessary," Peres explained.

      Israel, the sole possessor of an atomic arsenal in the Middle East, accuses Iran of marching toward nuclear weapon capability and has used the allegation to justify preparations to launch air strikes on the country's power plants.

      Iran, however, says it has lived up to its commitments under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and should thus be allowed the right to a peaceful nuclear program.

      While the UN nuclear watchdog has confirmed the non-diversion of nuclear material at Iranian nuclear facilities, Israeli media outlets have shed light on Israeli plans to launch the largest ever joint US war games in the occupied territories.

    • 3 years ago
  • beck7422
    • 0
      beck7422  
    • Be fair, show the language of the Conference that the US, Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands disagreed with.

      Past UN Racism conferences have been excuse to BE racist and demonize Jews and not just Israelis.

      Additionally Muslim nations where purges and racial injustice are occuring in mass quantities are not allowed to be discused at this Conference, due to the large numbers of Muslim nations objecting to critizing other Muslim nations.

      There is a big difference in a Racism Conference that discusses ALL Racism and one that targets only Jews and Imperialist Western Nations.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • Image
    • beck7422:

      You may read the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action in its entirety in English at this site. Click "Documents" and all the documents for the conference is listed for downloading, such as the Agenda and Rules of Procedure.

      If you can find "objectionable" language that undermine "free speech", please point it out.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • THE GREAT BENEFACTOR

      Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing the amounts provided to any other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct U.S. economic and military assistance since 1976 and the largest total recipient since World War II. Total direct U.S. aid to Israel amounts to well over $140 billion in 2003 dollars.2 Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one

      ‐fifth of America's foreign aid budget. In per capita terms, the United States gives each Israeli a direct subsidy worth about $500 per year.3 This largesse is especially striking when one realizes that Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita income roughly equal to South Korea or Spain.4
      Israel also gets other special deals from Washington.5 Other aid recipients get their money in quarterly installments, but Israel receives its entire appropriation at the beginning of each fiscal year and thus earns extra interest. Most recipients of American military assistance are required to spend all of it in the United States, but Israel can use roughly twenty

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • FULL TEXT OF FIRST FEW CHAPTERS AVAILABLE ON LINK.

      ==============================
      BOOK: THE ISRAEL LOBBY AND U.S. (PART 1)
      http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Israe...

      THE ISRAEL LOBBY AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY

      yOU CAN ALL READ THIS BOOK ON HERE AND YOU CAN ALL USE IT TO DEBATE AGAINST THE MEDIA PROPAGANDA.

      =================

      THE ISRAEL LOBBY AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY

      John J. Mearsheimer

      Department of Political Science

      University of Chicago

      Stephen M. Walt

      John F. Kennedy School of Government

      Harvard University

      March 2006 RWP06‐011
      ----

      The two authors of this Working Paper are solely responsible for the views expressed in it. As academic institutions, Harvard University and the University of Chicago do not take positions on the scholarship of individual faculty, and this article should not be interpreted or portrayed as reflecting the official position of either institution.

      An edited and reworked version of this paper was published in the

      London Review of Books Vol. 28, No. 6 (March 23, 2006), and is available online at www.lrb.co.uk
      THE ISRAEL LOBBY AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY

      U.S. foreign policy shapes events in every corner of the globe. Nowhere is this truer than in the Middle East, a region of recurring instability and enormous strategic importance. Most recently, the Bush Administration's attempt to transform the region into a community of democracies has helped produce a resilient insurgency in Iraq, a sharp rise in world oil prices, and terrorist bombings in Madrid, London, and Amman. With so much at stake for so many, all countries need to understand the forces that drive U.S. Middle East policy.

      The U.S. national interest should be the primary object of American foreign policy. For the past several decades, however, and especially since the Six Day War in 1967, the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy has been its relationship with Israel. The combination of unwavering U.S. support for Israel and the related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized U.S. security.

      This situation has no equal in American political history. Why has the United States been willing to set aside its own security in order to advance the interests of another state? One might assume that the bond between the two countries is based on shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives. As we show below, however, neither of those explanations can account for the remarkable level of material and diplomatic support that the United States provides to Israel.

      Instead, the overall thrust of U.S. policy in the region is due almost entirely to U.S. domestic politics, and especially to the activities of the "Israel Lobby." Other special interest groups have managed to skew U.S. foreign policy in directions they favored, but no lobby has managed to divert U.S. foreign policy as far from what the American national interest would otherwise suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. and Israeli interests are essentially identical.1

      In the pages that follow, we describe how the Lobby has accomplished this feat, and how its activities have shaped America's actions in this critical region. Given the strategic importance of the Middle East and its potential impact on others, both Americans and non

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/jer-dem-09.jpg

      Israel to erase all trace of Palestinian existence in Jerusalem City

      06,April,2009

      http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=307

      Throughout the 42 years of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territory, the Israeli Municipality of Jerusalem has carried out a systematic campaign against Palestinian houses in the occupied city under the pretext of lacking valid building permits. The Jerusalem municipality continues to show determination in advancing in its policy of demolishing homes, despite the international opposition as declared by Nir Barakat, the newly elected Mayor of Jerusalem Municipality that “it is an uncompromising war against the phenomenon.”
      Since the beginning of year 2009 until the end of March 2009, the Israeli Municipality of Jerusalem had issued 349 house demolition orders for Palestinian houses in Jerusalem city. Furthermore, the municipality has executed 45 demolition orders, of which, 25 were residential houses, 13 were Bedouin barracks and tents, 2 walls, 1 garage, 1 warehouse, and 2 offices and a Gas station.
      It is worth mentioning that the Israeli Municipality of Jerusalem had allocated 1.2 million shekels for monitoring the development of Palestinian structures in Jerusalem using Arial photos, which will dramatically lead to a drastic increase in the number of demolition orders that target Palestinian houses in the occupied city. Table 1 below shows the details of the demolished Palestinian houses in Jerusalem from January 1, until March 31, 2009:

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • ....Publishers Weekly
      In his latest work, renowned Israeli author and academic Pappe (A History of Modern Palestine) does not mince words, doing Jimmy Carter one better (or worse, depending on one's point of view) by accusing Israel of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, beginning in the 1948 war for independence and continuing through the present. Focusing primarily on Plan D (Dalet, in Hebrew), conceived on March 10, 1948, Pappe demonstrates how ethnic cleansing was not a circumstance of war, but rather a deliberate goal of combat for early Israeli military units organized by David Ben-Gurion, whom Pappe labels the "architect of ethnic cleansing." The forced expulsion of 800,000 Palestinians between 1948 and 1949, Pappe argues, was part of a long-standing Zionist plan to manufacture an ethnically pure Jewish state. Framing his argument with accepted international and U.N. definitions of ethnic cleansing, Pappe follows with an excruciatingly detailed account of Israeli military involvement in the demolition and depopulation of hundreds of villages, and the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Arab inhabitants. An accessible, learned resource, this volume provides important insights into the historical antecedents of today's conflict, but its conclusions will not be easy for everyone to stomach: Pappe argues that the ethnic cleansing of Palestine continues today, and calls for the unconditional return of all Palestinian refugees and an end to the Israeli occupation. Without question, Pappe's account will provoke ire from many readers; importantly, it will spark discussion as well. (Jan.)

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Pappe, an Israeli historian and a senior lecturer at Haifa University, has written a superb account of the Israeli expulsion of the Palestinians from their land in 1948. He quotes David Ben Gurion, leader of the Zionist movement from the mid-1920 until the 1960s, who wrote in his diary in 1938, ?I am for compulsory transfer I do not see anything immoral in it.? This contradicts the Zionists? public claim that they were seizing a land without a people. Pappe writes of the Israelis? March 1948 plan for evicting the Palestinians, ?The orders came with a detailed description of the methods to be employed to forcibly evict the people: large-scale intimidation laying siege to and bombarding villages and population centres setting fire to homes, properties and goods expulsion demolition and, finally, planting mines among the rubble to prevent any of the expelled inhabitants from returning.? Between 30 March and 15 May 1948, i.e. before any Arab government intervened, Israeli forces seized 200 villages and expelled 250,000 Palestinians. The Israeli leadership stated, ?The principal objective of the operation is the destruction of Arab villages ? the eviction of the villagers.? On 9 April, Israeli forces massacred 93 people, including 30 babies, at Deir Yassin. In Haifa, the Israeli commander ordered, ?Kill any Arab you encounter.? This all happened under British rule in Palestine, where Britain had 75,000 troops: Britain?s Mandate did not end until 14 May. The Labour government connived at the Israeli onslaught, although the British state was legally obliged as the occupier (and also by UN resolution 181) to uphold law and order. Yet the Labour government announced that it would no longer be responsible for law and order and it withdrew all the British policemen. It also forbade the presence of any UN bodies, again breaching the terms of the UN resolution. The government ordered British forces to disarm the few Palestinians who had weapons, promising to protect them from Israeli attacks, then immediately reneged on this promise. On 24 May 1948, Ben Gurion wrote, ?We will establish a Christian state in Lebanon, the southern border of which will be the Litani River. We will break Transjordan, bomb Amman and destroy its army, and then Syria falls, and if Egypt will still continue to fight ? we will bombard Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo. This will be in revenge for what they (the Egyptians, the Aramis and Assyrians) did to our forefathers during Biblical times.? These ravings of an insane warmonger hardly betrayed any genuine fear of a `second holocaust?. The Palestinians were suffering massive expulsion, not trying to destroy the Jewish community. Pappe summarises, ?When it created its nation-state, the Zionist movement did not wage a war that `tragically but inevitably? led to the expulsion of `parts of? the indigenous population, but the other way round: the main goal was the ethnic cleansing of all of Palestine, which the movement coveted for its new state. A few weeks after the ethnic cleansing operations began, the neighbouring Arab states sent a small army ? small in comparison to their overall military might ? to try, in vain, to prevent the ethnic cleansing. The war with the regular Arab armies did not bring the ethnic cleansing operations to a halt until their successful completion in the autumn of 1948.? Overall, the Zionist forces uprooted more than half Palestine?s population, 800,000 people, destroyed...

    • 3 years ago
  • BigJoeSixPack
  • smallgod
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine

      by Ilan Pappe

      Publisher: National Book Network
      Pub. Date: September 2007
      ISBN-13: 9781851685554

      Synopsis
      In this controversial new book, a prominent Israeli historian at Haifa University revisits the formative period of the State of Israel. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord during the War of Independence, he offers archival evidence to demonstrate that a central plank in Israel's founding ideology was the forcible removal of the indigenous population. This book is a passionate plea to acknowledge the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948 as the root cause of the ongoing Palestine-Israel conflict.
      Publishers Weekly
      In his latest work, renowned Israeli author and academic Pappe (A History of Modern Palestine) does not mince words, doing Jimmy Carter one better (or worse, depending on one's point of view) by accusing Israel of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, beginning in the 1948 war for independence and continuing through the present. Focusing primarily on Plan D (Dalet, in Hebrew), conceived on March 10, 1948, Pappe demonstrates how ethnic cleansing was not a circumstance of war, but rather a deliberate goal of combat for early Israeli military units organized by David Ben-Gurion, whom Pappe labels the "architect of ethnic cleansing." The forced expulsion of 800,000 Palestinians between 1948 and 1949, Pappe argues, was part of a long-standing Zionist plan to manufacture an ethnically pure Jewish state. Framing his argument with accepted international and U.N. definitions of ethnic cleansing, Pappe follows with an excruciatingly detailed account of Israeli military involvement in the demolition and depopulation of hundreds of villages, and the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Arab inhabitants. An accessible, learned resource, this volume provides important insights into the historical antecedents of today's conflict, but its conclusions will not be easy for everyone to stomach: Pappe argues that the ethnic cleansing of Palestine continues today, and calls for the unconditional return of all Palestinian refugees and an end to the Israeli occupation. Without question, Pappe's account will provoke ire from many readers; importantly, it will spark discussion as well.

    • 3 years ago
  • freecorbinj
    • 0
      freecorbinj  
    • Highr0ller:

      Indigenous population? how the hell do you decide who is the "indigenous population" of that region? There has been wars and land grabs and upheavals of power in that region for THOUSANDS of years.

    • 3 years ago
  • USWGO
    • 0
      USWGO  
    • Obama I may not like some of the sneaky political things you do as president but I am NOT a racist.

      Just because I don't like some of the things you do doesn't mean I don't like black people.

      I am all for equality, if the leader sux it doesn't matter what color or gender, although I do know hate groups will use peoples mistakes but I am not one of those stupid people.

      I am sick of the racist card, stop claiming racism because a white man doesn't like any politician whether hes black, brown, oriental, green, blue, white, women, man.

      WHY DOES COLOR MATTER, We are all the same If a leader is a jerk I won't treat him like a god nor will I be some hateful racist, it's wrong to be hateful but not liking a politician because the things the politician does that is not good.

    • 3 years ago
  • BigJoeSixPack
    • 0
      BigJoeSixPack  
    • USWGO:

      You racist ass! lol

      You may be a racist if you trip over it while looking for some one playing the race card.

      This has nothing to do with Obama (his 'politics') or nigras Jethro...

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
  • mendokusai
    • 0
      mendokusai  
    • Ricky84:

      a few questions

      why isnt it considered to be "limiting free speech" when you are arrested for asking questions or doubting the number of victims of the holocaust?

      what you would consider limits on free speech, others may see as basic respect. is it not possible to be able to exchange ideas or criticize beliefs without taking a derogatory or insulting approach?

      one huge difference between the east and the west is that there is a deeper sense of reverence in the eastern traditions. there still are limits. at least more so than whatever is left in western society. shouldnt those things which are sacred to others be treated in such a way that sanctity isnt compromised? what is lost with such an approach? the anger and reactions that often cause problems are usually the result of the delivery of the criticism, not the criticism itself. considering it a "freedom" to insult and demean others doesnt make much sense to me.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Ricky84:

      “why isnt it considered to be "limiting free speech" when you are arrested for asking questions or doubting the number of victims of the holocaust?”
      I’m an American and last time I checked it wasn’t illegal to doubt the number of holocaust victims. At any rate if you were arrested for doubting the number of holocaust victims then you obviously do not have freedom of speech. What is this in reference to the German guy arrested in Britain?
      “what you would consider limits on free speech, others may see as basic respect. is it not possible to be able to exchange ideas or criticize beliefs without taking a derogatory or insulting approach?”
      No one is saying that we should advocate rudeness. We just don’t believe that being rude is an arrestable offense. If individual rights are derived from god given, or just plain inherent rights to a free man, and our country (being America) was formed to protect those rights, then it would be contradictory to restrict those rights based on the justification for having the country.
      “shouldnt those things which are sacred to others be treated in such a way that sanctity isnt compromised?”
      Sacredness is relative. Just because someone finds Christianity to be a sacred religion does not mean that I or anyone should be forced to share their opinion.

      “considering it a "freedom" to insult and demean others doesnt make much sense to me.”
      Yeah and executing undesirables, like gays in the middle east, doesn’t make that much sense to me either.

    • 3 years ago
  • mendokusai
    • 0
      mendokusai  
    • Ricky84:

      the holocaust thing, yea its in europe where questioning the numbers or anything else related to it is a criminal offense. not in america. but if "free speech" is the issue at hand, then why be selective about it in protesting one issue but not another

      as far as religion and "sacredness" being subjective, yea duh. thats pretty obvious. in all of your talk about rights there is no mention of responsibility. but your comment on how being rude is not a punishable offense does say something about the difference in cultures.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Ricky84:

      I resent the inaccuracy of your remark on here:
      "
      the holocaust thing, yea its in europe where questioning the numbers or anything else related to it is a criminal offense. not in america. but if "free speech" is the issue at hand, then why be selective about it in protesting one issue but not another."

      MY RESPONSE:
      I'm a European, living in Europe (Ireland), and how dare you lie, and then compound your lie with another lie. I am free to question the numbers anytime, and it is not a "criminal offense".
      We have more freedom of MEDIA here in Europe because the AIPAC Lobby does not own as much of the MEDIA here in Europe as they do in America. God help the American people ....they are in the grip of AIPAC.....even Hollywood is mostly Jewish.
      American's can login to the THE INDEPENDENT every Saturday and read ROBERT FISK.........
      ROBERT FISK is the most award winnng war correspondent in the world. He tells it like it is........................thanks in part that the INDEPENDENT is owned by Irishman TONY O'REILLY..
      FORGET the Rupert Murdochs of the media world.........they use doublespeak and put a pro-Israel spin on events.............some even resort to downright lies. Why I ask you did ISRAEL PROHIBIT all international journalists from entering the Gaza Strip to report on the war? Despite their efforts the reports came out of Gaza.
      =======================================

      Robert Fisk holds more British and international journalism awards than any other foreign correspondent. The Financial Times described Fisk as "unrivaled as a war correspondent." The London Sunday Times said of him, "He is a devastating witness to the failure of politics to guard mankind against itself." His book, Pity the Nation, a history of the Lebanon war, was published to great critical acclaim. His latest book is a monumental 1,000-page work, "The Great War for Civilisation : The Conquest of the Middle East," which has been described by the New York Times as "an unflinching, stunning achievement."======================================

      LINK FOR SATURDAY ARTICLE BY ROBERT FISK:

      http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fiskrsquos-world-t...
      '

    • 3 years ago
  • mendokusai
    • 0
      mendokusai  
    • Ricky84:

      @ highroller

      how dare i lie? what did i lie about? if you really do live in europe as you say then you should be aware of the law against publicly denying the holocaust in many of the countries. and by "law" i mean ITS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

      dont believe me? ask david irving

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4734648.stm

      you need to stop posting so many damn novels and spend more time reading what others write and checking your facts. this has nothing to do with israels treatment of journalists. completely different conversation.

    • 3 years ago
  • freecorbinj
    • 0
      freecorbinj  
    • I can't seem to find the actual language of the documents that Canada, Israel, the United States, Italy, Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany are boycotting, but it sounds like the reason they're doing it is because the documents attack Israel and lend themselves towards anti-Western language. Makes sense to me, and not in any sort of Zionist plot kind of way either. It's like a meeting to sort out office conflicts, saying "OK this meeting is for all of us to sort out our problems. We want everyone to understand where everyone else is coming from. Except for Bob over there. Bob, you suck. Everyone, you can talk shit about Bob all you want, and if Bob defends himself, everyone can call Bob an asshole."

      Would the NAACP support an anti-racist form that allowed people to call black people niggers, or claim that they are subhuman? Of course not.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • freecorbinj:

      Actually, it's more like, "Team, we have a problem. The boss and his assistant are stealing all the doughnuts from our cafeteria. It must stop and we should talk to them about it. They don't deny it but they won't explain why. They won't meet with us either. So...forget about the doughnuts. But, you still need to pay for them every week."

    • 3 years ago
  • freecorbinj
  • TabulaRasa
  • Mount_Zion
    • 0
      Mount_Zion  
    • This is unbelievable, the jewish state is one of the most racist places on the planet. We need to stop supporting this terrorist state. Billions of american tax payer dollars sent to Israel which is the largest recipient of US aid!

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Mount_Zion:

      THE GREAT BENEFACTOR

      Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing the amounts provided to any other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct U.S. economic and military assistance since 1976 and the largest total recipient since World War II. Total direct U.S. aid to Israel amounts to well over $140 billion in 2003 dollars.2 Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one

      ‐fifth of America's foreign aid budget. In per capita terms, the United States gives each Israeli a direct subsidy worth about $500 per year.3 This largesse is especially striking when one realizes that Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita income roughly equal to South Korea or Spain.4
      Israel also gets other special deals from Washington.5 Other aid recipients get their money in quarterly installments, but Israel receives its entire appropriation at the beginning of each fiscal year and thus earns extra interest. Most recipients of American military assistance are required to spend all of it in the United States, but Israel can use roughly twenty

    • 3 years ago
  • philomar
    • 0
      philomar  
    • I can't believe people are critiquing Obama on this... for standing beside isreal? Canada, austrialia and holland also feel the same way for standing against anti-semitism - when this conference includes:

      "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is expected to attend the conference.

      The Iranian leader has raised concerns by questioning whether the Holocaust happened and has said that Israel should be wiped off the map."

      http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-04-19-voa16.cfm

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
  • ashcatash
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • philomar:

      actually, no he really didn't. he said that the israeli gov should be swept into the sea or something like that. it had nothing to do with the nation of israel or the people of israel (jews). it was a metaphorical statement about how dangerous and evil the israeli gov is. and he's right.

      it was an intentional mistranslations to spur hostilities with Iran and the Bush administration.

      please...fact check, it came from an AP release that all the news sites picked up and spewed out without fact checking themselves.

    • 3 years ago
  • smallgod
  • capt_ayhab
    • 0
      capt_ayhab  
    • philomar:

      I speak Farsi and No he did not say it. What he said was that ZIONIST[and not Israel] will be gone form pages of history just like communism and Soviet Union disappeared from pages of history.
      It is total misrepresentation and mis-translation of the truth. There are 25,000 Jews living in Iran second biggest Jewish community in ME next to Israel. They have lived there for 1000's of years and they are as much of a proud Iranians as they are proud Jews.

      People please do not fall for AIPAC ugly and deceitful propaganda. And as for Netherlands, it is enough to say that their PM is one of the ugliest anti human anti Islam ever existed and when he came to US, only Faux and trash organization like such gave him the platform to spew his hat. He is no better than KKK.

    • 3 years ago
  • Teshomegd
    • 0
      Teshomegd  
    • I believe it is a smart move by the US and the Netherlands to boycott the conference as the document proposed by the U.N essentially removes certain elements of free speech and is targeted against the western community. If the racism conference was legitimate it would weigh in all races and not target the west. It is pro Islam, not that that's a bad thing however i believe it is lopsided.

    • 3 years ago
  • bulbousonions
  • BigJoeSixPack
  • AngloZombie
  • TabulaRasa
  • pressrecord
    • 0
      pressrecord  
    • "The American Israel Public Affairs Committee applauded Mr. Obama's decision to boycott, saying it "underscores America's unstinting commitment to combating intolerance and racism in all its forms and in all settings."

      But Rep. Barbara Lee, (D., Calif.), the chair of the black caucus, said the group was "deeply dismayed."

      'This decision is inconsistent with the administration's policy of engaging with those we agree with and those we disagree with,' she said. "By boycotting Durban, the U.S. is making it more difficult for it to play a leadership role on U.N. Human Rights Council as it states it plans to do. This is a missed opportunity, plain and simple."

      Hours earlier, Human Rights Watch appealed for the U.S. to go, saying it 'should stand with the victims of racism.'"

      It doesn't make sense to me, either. Why boycott it? The conference would be a great opportunity to address the ills both the US and Israel suffer and finally get some major resolutions to happen. So what if Iran and the rest of the world blame western nations? This is the chance to finally put misconceptions into place and work towards a more secure future for Americans worldwide!

      By boycotting, it shows how this administration is less committed about the welfare of Americans than it is for the welfare of Israelis. WTF??

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • pressrecord:

      do you all not follow the news. they are considering limiting freedom of speech so that muslims do not feel insulted about their religion

      did you not read the article? it says that in there and it's a VERY valid point. I disagree with limiting freedom of speech as well.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
  • NeverNude
  • pressrecord
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • pressrecord:

      The Jews own the MEDIA and more so in America than in Europe, It is the AIPAC LOBBY controlling America..................Jews own most of Hollywood, which is the very reason we are fed a strict and steady diet of Jewish Holocaust........victim complex..........gee guy's my ancestors died too....I'm Irish living in Ireland. Gee guys....the Palestinians have been ethnically cleansed since 1948 and it is still going on...........and they have no voice....no state, no army, no electricity, little food and little medical help.....and Israel won't even allow them to import CEMENT to rebuild or repair their recently bombed homes for supposed 'security reasons.'
      America gives $300 BILLION per annum to Israel to continue to arm themselves and crush their Palestinians.
      Boo.

      American people please speak up. We all support the good American public...........not your AIPAC Lobby, or your government .

    • 3 years ago
  • escarondito
  • keithponder
    • 0
      keithponder  
    • No excuses. We should be there,but I'm not surprised that we're not because to some degree, President Obama is a puppet to the State of Israel.

      BTW,to what country is Israel a state of ?

      Go figure.

    • 3 years ago
  • Reedalmighty
    • 0
      Reedalmighty  
    • keithponder:

      a state is just a governing body.

      all countries are states.

      the "united states" are just that.
      separate united governments.

      and until after the civil war, nobody really considered themselves an "american" over a "virginian" (or whatever state they came from)

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • Interesting how the title cut out the fact that the Netherlands will be doing the same. I guess they're run by the Zionists as well? Because the Dutch are run by evil racists folks. It couldn't actually be that the US and the Netherlands are standing on principle and have legitimate reasons to boycott the meetings.Yeah and the US is joining the Human rights council btw.

      "Unfortunately, it now seems certain these remaining concerns will not be addressed in the document to be adopted by the conference next week," Mr. Wood said in a statement. "Therefore, with regret, the United States will not join the review conference."

      Despite the decision, he stressed that the U.S. "is profoundly committed to ending racism and racial discrimination" and "will work with all people and nations to build greater resolve and enduring political will to halt racism and discrimination wherever it occurs."

      Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen echoed Mr. Woods concern over the document, saying in a strongly worded statement that a proposed closing declaration for meeting was "unacceptable."

      In recent weeks, Dutch diplomats had worked feverishly behind the scenes to try to salvage a final statement that would be acceptable to all nations, proposing a number of alternative texts. But Mr. Verhagen described negotiations over the declaration as "grim" and said Western nations were subjected to political attacks.

      "The anti-racism conference is too important to abuse for political goals and attacks on the West," he said. "The Netherlands will not be a part of it."

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
  • squeege
  • iPedro
    • 0
      iPedro  
    • current89:

      Canada is also boycotting the conference for the same reasons.

      Leave it to Fox News to leave out important information that doesn't fit their spin against anything not Republican.

    • 3 years ago
  • barbara3d
  • sickinjersey
    • 0
      sickinjersey  
    • It may be propaganda but you can not ignore the fact that Washington is coveting Israel again even when they are being overly aggressive towards the Palestinian state.White phosphorous is an evil science.

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • sickinjersey:

      i actually think obama is being remarkably distant with Israel given the historic ties between washinton and israel.

      i don't think this is his attempt to cuddle up with them

      WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration will boycott "with regret" a U.N. conference on racism next week over objectionable language in the meeting's final document that could single out Israel for criticism and restrict free speech, the State Department said Saturday.

      the last part, restrict free speech. obama is against restrictions on the freedom of speech, unless I'm reading that wrong. so..ya'know...what are you talking about?

      ...are the dutch cuddling up to israel too??

    • 3 years ago
  • neocongo
  • asherp
  • barbara3d
    • 0
      barbara3d  
    • neocongo:

      Neo never has anything to say but negative one-liners. Not a deep thinker I guess. Maybe puffing on the weed too long? (its a joke so smile sometime, even if it hurts)

    • 3 years ago
  • timetide
    • 0
      timetide  
    • I strongly believe the US needs to take the route of a corporation under fire from the public, hire a PR firm. or discover commmon sense. Seriously, boycotting the UN Racism confrence is flat out one fo the dumbest political moves we as a nation have made.

    • 3 years ago
  • pressrecord
  • zack
  • UWAZell
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • pressrecord:

      Obama is a coward. He has bowed to the Israel Lobby.

      He should have stood up to AIPAC because the world has to deal with the ethnic cleansing being carried out by Israel.....................

      I had faith in Obama.

      Just shows me that the American president is a puppet for AIPAC.

      DISGUSTING.

    • 3 years ago
  • edge0freason
more from Community:

top videos