Community | April 23, 2009 | 10 comments

Kansas Governor Vetoes RBGH Milk Labeling Bill

Image
JanforGore
In a victory for local dairy farmers and consumers, Gov. Sebelius vetoes controversial bill that would have limited rbGH labeling on dairy products in the state.

To support Kansas dairy farmers and consumers, Governor Kathleen Sebelius has vetoed legislation concerning the labels on milk products. The bill, HB 2121, faced massive opposition from dairy, consumer, health, animal welfare and environmental organizations across the country; nearly 30 of which wrote a letter to Governor Sebelius, President Obama’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, urging her to veto HR 2121. The bill passed by the Kansas State Legislature would have required an additional disclaimer on labels for dairy products produced from cows not treated with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH or rbST), a genetically engineered, artificial hormone that induces cows to produce more milk.

The Governor’s office sent out a press release late this afternoon, explaining why she vetoed the bill:

“…the Bill before me…provides for changes in dairy labeling that could make it more difficult to provide consumers with clear information. The milk labeling provisions negatively impact a dairy producer’s ability to inform consumers that milk is from cows not treated with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBST).”

“Supporters of the bill claim it’s necessary to protect consumers from false or misleading information. Yet there has been overwhelming opposition by consumer groups, small dairy producers and retailers to this proposed legislation. Therefore, pursuant to Article 2, Section 14 of the Constitution of the State of Kansas, I veto HB 2121.”

“I applaud Governor Sebelius’ veto of HB 2121, which would have made it more difficult for dairy farmers who don’t use recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH) to label their milk as such. Governor Sebelius clearly recognized that the bill’s provisions on dairy labeling would have made it harder for consumers to get the information they want about the dairy products they consume and would have hindered dairy farmer’s ability to tell consumers that their milk is from cows not treated with rbGH,” said Dr. Michael Hansen, senior scientist at Consumers Union, nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports.

Due to growing consumer demand, companies are removing rbGH from their dairy products across the country. In addition, over 160 hospitals all over the country have pledged to serve rbGH-free products and the past president of the American Medical Association said in a letter to all AMA members that hospitals should serve only milk produced without rbGH. A recent report compiled by the Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility found that more than half of the 100 largest dairy processors in the country have gone completely or partially rBGH-free due to consumer demand.

“Governor Sebelius made the right decision for dairy producers, businesses, and citizens today,” said Heather Whitehead, True Food Network Director at the Center for Food Safety. “Consumers want more information about the foods we purchase and feed to our families; not less. HR 2121 would have taken Kansas in the wrong direction, and we applaud Governor Sebelius for protecting Kansas farmers and consumers.”
_________________
Finally, some good news and a victory. Thank you, Governor Sebelius for voting for consumers, health, the environment, animals, and consumer disclosure. This proves that public demand and pressure CAN bring change. I am proud to say I am one of 8000 people who e-mailed Governor Sebelius from this organzation asking her to veto this bill, and this is only the beginning.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Earth and Science,   Health,   2 more
  2. tags:
    News Green Earth and Science Environment 11 more
  3.     
    |

10 comments // Kansas Governor Vetoes RBGH Milk Labeling Bill

  • Bren589
  • JanforGore
  • tome_erau
    • 0
      tome_erau  
    • Can somebody please tell me why I care if there's rBGH in the cows that make my milk if it has no effect on nutrition or taste?

      Or should I just blindly hate it because it come Monsanto.

    • 3 years ago
  • ras_menelik
    • 0
      ras_menelik  
    • tome_erau:

      BOVINE GROWTH HORMONE (rBGH)
      By Gary Wade, Physicist 11/2007

      Recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) is the genetically engineered bovine growth hormone that was developed by, among others, Monsanto Company, and is sold under the name Posilac. Monsanto Company spent around one billion dollars to develop BGH and bring it to market. The FDA approved BGH for use in dairy farming in November 1993, it actually began usage in February 1994. BGH is injected into cows to increase their milk production by approximately 20%.

      The extra BGH from the injection is very hard on the cow's metabolism and health. BGH injected cow's have approximately a 80% increase in the rate of mastitis (udder infections), which must be treated with antibiotics. These antibiotics end up in the milk and milk products. The effects of BGH are so devastating to a cow, it would be a wonder how it got FDA approval, if the FDA were not so systematically corrupt. To illustrate how devastating BGH is, I will quote directly from an article written by Minnesota dairy farmer John Kurtz who carried out BGH field trails between 1985 and 1988 before FDA approval of BGH.(113)

      "When the injections began, it was obvious something happened. After about three days the injected cows were milking more. An hour before milking time, their milk would run, because they weren't able to hold the milk. They'd be stomping from side to side and bellowing, wanting to be milked. Something had been triggered....

      "The first lactation milking period went extremely well. But one problem caught up with us in the second lactation: poor body condition. Basically, these cows were... taking fat and body reserves and turning them into milk."


      http://www.rifeenergymedicine.com/BGH.html

    • 3 years ago
  • donkeyfly69
  • judiestar
  • ras_menelik
    • 0
      ras_menelik  
    • I chose to travel Central Ca(giant Organic Ag) for Earth day took notes

      one thing I haven't figured out yet

      An ad for bovine lungs Medicine for heifer up to 20 months old called "biovar 100(spelling?)"

      the disclaimer said may not be legal in all STATES

      and

      Labeling the milk was illegal !!!!

      punishable by flogging (I just only about the wiping)

      any one know what this is?

    • 3 years ago
  • donkeyfly69
  • pjacobs51
  • JanforGore
more from Community:

top videos