Image
The "If Americans Knew" web site also publishes and keeps current shocking information on the daily toll in the OPT. Some of its disturbing figures affecting Palestinians from September 29, 2000 (the first day of the Second Intifada) to the present at the hands of Israeli forces are as follows:


-- 934 Palestinian children have been killed in most cases while engaging in normal daily activities like going to school, playing, shopping, or being in their homes. PCHR reports a total of 4284 Palestinian deaths through March 23, 2007.


-- A known total of 31,307 Palestinians have been injured, mostly civilians, and mostly under the same circumstances children were killed. The B'Tselem Israeli Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories reports these numbers are extremely conservative while the internationally respected Palestine Red Crescent Society reports much higher totals that are likely more accurate. In addition, these figures exclude large numbers of Palestinians who die when unable to reach medical care in time because of Israeli checkpoints, road closures, curfews and other restrictions on mobility in the OPT. Also, no accurate records are available on the large number of avoidable Palestinian deaths resulting from deprivation and/or disease following the first time ever imposition of sanctions on an occupied people from early 2006 to the present.


-- The cite reports US financial aid to Israel is $7,023,288 per day, but the true number is far higher including:


- around $3 billion or more annually in direct aid;


- billions more in loans as needed;


- millions annually for immigrant resettlement;


- multi-billions in waved loan repayments;


- billions more in military aid, financial help to develop Israel's defense industry, transfer of state-of-the-art technology and the latest US weapons, and US guarantees for Israel's access to oil;


- $22 billion Israel got over the past 50 years through the sale of its below-market paying bonds that have financed half its development - meaning the colonization of annexed Palestinian land; military aid for its imperial aggressive wars; and still more as needed and requested.


Tiny Israel today (with six million Jews) gets more US financial aid (in all direct and indirect forms) than all other countries in the world combined.
====================================================







Palestinians Beware

24 April 2009

Mitri I. Musleh - Israel’s new demand for being recognized as a Jewish state by the Palestinians as a precondition for peace between the two people is ambiguous, confusing and is totally a time wasting mechanism. Israel’s current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu advised US senior envoy, George Mitchell, that Palestinians must recognize Israel as a “Jewish State” before peace talks can begin. Israeli newspaper Haaretz quoted a senior official in Netanyahu’s office as saying that “Israel expects the Palestinians to recognize Israel as a Jewish state before talking about two states for two peoples”.

I am absolutely and totally confused. For all of those years since 1948 where the UN recognized Israel as a Jewish state, the illegal Israeli military occupation of Palestine, the endless number of war casualties on both sides, the creation of the largest contingent number of Palestinian refugees, the ongoing US yearly financial and military aid to Israel, all the international efforts deployed to establish peace between the two nations and all the current Israeli leaders wish for is for Israel to be recognized as a Jewish state by the Palestinians.

What ever happened to Israel’s demand for security? Has the new Israeli government achieved security for its people?
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Green,   11 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Culture 65 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

41 comments // If Americans knew....

  • Mount_Zion
  • McCainiac
    • McCainiac  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • Highr0ller
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Is all of this racist? Of course it is. In fact, those who care to study the UN’s Convention on Genocide, passed in 1948 as Zionist militias were still driving Palestinians off their land and destroying their villages, will see that Israel’s behavior meets some of the criteria of article 2 of the convention which describes genocide as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or part a national, ethnical, racial or religious group:

      (a) killing members of the group
      (b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
      (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part

      Israelis involved in the struggle against racism and occupation are fighting an uphill battle. The structural discrimination of the state against its non-Jewish citizens and against the Palestinians living in the occupied territories (as well as the Syrians living on the occupied Golan Heights) is a motor driving Israel and its people from one extreme to another. Thirty years ago it was regarded as unthinkable that Menahim Begin could ever be Israel’s Prime Minister but Begin was followed by Yitzhak Shamir, Benyamin Netanyahu and Ehud Olmert. All of them come out of the same school of Revisionist Zionism. Now revisionism is the mainstream, the labor movement is marginalized and Israel has again elected Netanyahu as its Prime Minister. He in turn has chosen as Foreign Minister the crude, arrogant, provocative and openly racist West Bank settler Avigdor Liebermann.

      Racism in Israel is not like racism in other states, which is usually a matter of changing laws and slowly working on public opinion. In Israel racism is so deeply embedded in Zionist ideology and the structure of the state that without racism Israel cannot remain the state that it has become. Yet there are no signs that the Israeli people or the politicians they are electing as their leaders have any intention of changing direction. When they have a powerful military and when they are under no pressure from the outside world they see no reason to change. In its blockade of Gaza Israel has been supported from the beginning by the US, the EU and the Quartet. None of these venerable authorities could see any reason for Israel to be punished or restrained even after the killing of 1400 Palestinians in Gaza from late December 2008 to mid-January 2009.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • The legal definition of genocide

      The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

      Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

      1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

      2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

      Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

      Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide

      "Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

      (a) Killing members of the group;
      (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
      (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
      (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
      (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

      Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

      (a) Genocide;
      (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
      (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
      (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
      (e) Complicity in genocide."

      http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

      Genocide is the ONLY word that accurately describes what Israel does (and has been doing since before its inception) to the Palestinians.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Vierotchka:

      Thank you. You are correct. The Israelis amake a business of manipulating the US Congress and US media. Only yesterday two AIPAC members had a case against them dropped by the US government......................shows the power of their money.

      The people of America need to take back their democracy.

    • 3 years ago
  • igordy
  • Vierotchka
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued

      Again justifiable festering anger erupted into the Second (al-Aqsa Mosque) Intifada in September, 2000 following former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's provocative visit to the holy al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied East Jerusalem (the Noble Sanctuary for Muslims and Temple Mount for Jews and Christians). It became far worse following elections for Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) seats on January 25, 2006 when, fed up with years of Fatah-led corruption and betrayal, Palestinians democratically elected a Hamas government Israel, Washington and the West acted savagely against since to destroy because its leaders won't act as a quisling government the way Fatah's Yasser Arafat and current Fatah Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, and his powerful National Security Advisor and "Gaza warlord," Mohammed Dahlan (controlling Fatah security forces), were always willing to do and Abbas and especially Dahlan still are. For Hamas' courage and dedication to their people, the Palestinians have paid dearly ever since and still do. This must end.

      It's long past time people of conscience everywhere take a public stand and demand 40 years of illegal repressive occupation end so Palestinians can finally have what all people have a right to expect and demand - to live freely in their own land the way international law mandates with nations supporting it accepting nothing less.

      Palestinians and their legions of supporters worldwide aren't waiting for conflict resolution that won't ever come unless enough committed people everywhere demand their leaders act on it. A growing effort is building to convince them by calling for an organized global campaign for boycott, divestment and political and economic sanctions against Israel the same way they developed in the 1980s against the South African apartheid state that finally brought results.

      It must include a demand that the world community of nations ends the "last taboo" of silence when it comes to Israel. It must be willing to expose and denounce what no longer can be tolerated that current South African Intelligence Minister Ronnie Kasrils calls worse than apartheid saying Israel "behav(es) like fascists when they do certain things (like attacking Palestinians with helicopter gunships and tanks)." What better time to do what Kasrils is surely calling for than on the 40th anniversary of the longest continuous occupation in the world that no longer can be tolerated.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued

      Israel claims it wants peace but never negotiated in good faith to get it. The current so-called "road map" is a cruel hoax going nowhere. It's as fraudulent as all other phony peace efforts before it. Beginning with Camp David in 1978, the US bribed Egypt with billions in "baksheesh" in return for peace with Israel leaving Palestinians out in the cold. The predictable result was festering anger that exploded in what became the First Intifada in 1987 killing hundreds of Palestinians that finally led to the Oslo Accords and their so-called Declaration of Principles in 1993. Under them, Israel got what it wanted giving back nothing more in return than the right of Palestinians to be Israeli enforcers in their own land. So highly touted and praised when signed, it offered no Right of Return, no independent Palestinian state, no portion of Jerusalem as a capital, and no Palestinian control over their own daily lives free from a foreign occupier. From then till now, things only got worse.

      Oslo I led to Oslo II in 1995 that divided the West Bank into the way it exists today in Areas "A," "B," "C," and "D"; "H-1" and "H-2" in Hebron; nature reserves (in the OPT) for Jews only; closed military areas; security zones; and "open green spaces" for Jewish-only housing developments in over half of Arab East Jerusalem (slowly being stolen entirely) leaving Palestinians confined to unconnected cantons surrounded by growing Israeli settlements, restricted roads, and all kinds of impediments restricting free movement preventing any semblance of normal daily life.

      So-called "permanent status" talks then began in July, 2000 at Camp David resulting in another insulting betrayal. Portrayed in the West as a generous offer in good faith, it was, in fact, just another example of US-Israeli duplicity leaving out entirely what Palestinians most want - a free and sovereign state or a single multi-ethnic one with Jews and Palestinians having equal rights, the Right of Return, a portion of Jerusalem as a capital or the entire city as capital for both, and an end to foreign occupation. All that was offered in exchange for "peace" Israeli-style is what they now have - life locked down in unconnected cantons on mostly scrub land in virtual open-air prisons surrounded by expanding Israeli settlements continuing to encroach on Palestinian lands fast disappearing as Israelis take what they want dunum by dunum.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued

      From 1948, when Palestinians lost 78% of their homeland, to 1967 when they lost the rest to a hostile foreign occupier, to the present, life in the OPT has been oppressive, intolerable and criminally imposed on a defenseless people helpless against it and unsupported ever since in their courageous struggle for liberation one day they'll achieve because they'll never give up till they have what they rightfully and legally deserve. For 40 years under occupation they have no recognized state of their own, no right of citizenship, and no power over their daily lives.

      They live in a constant state of fear in the virtual open-air prisons of Gaza and the West Bank under Israel's racist apartheid laws even the Israeli High Court shamefully upholds. They're strangled economically and politically; denied free movement in their own country from a structure of roadblocks, checkpoints, electric fences and a land-grabbing "Apartheid Separation wall" the World Court in the Hague ruled (14 - 1) is "contrary to international law" because it "destroyed and (illegally) confiscated" property, it greatly restricts Palestinian movement, and it "severely impedes the exercise by the Palestinian people of (the) right to self-determination."

      For its Jewish citizens, Israel is nominally democratic, although far from perfect at the least. For its Arab Muslim and small Christian population, it's a daily struggle for survival under the harshest conditions of all kinds imaginable those outside the territories and most Jews in Israel can't possibly understand and too few even try. For 40 brutal years, Israel has illegally controlled all aspects of Palestinian life in the OPT with an iron fist it freely swings on the slightest pretext. It cantonized the indigenous population under deplorable conditions in refugee camps and bantustans surrounded and cut off from all other ones. It rules defenseless people by intimidation and repressive military might. It denies Palestinian people their right to a truly sovereign independent state and won't allow Muslims, Christians and other non-Jewish legal residents in greater Israel the same rights as Jews including the right of citizenship and safety under one sovereign nation for everyone entitled to it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      For 40 years under occupation on one-fifth of their original land and nearly 60 years after the "Nakba," Palestinians are forced to endure the most appalling repression no one should have to face for a single day. Five million of them, including 1.4 million Israeli citizens, are denied all rights afforded Jews only and are subjected to daily abuse and neglect along with regular IDF assaults against which they're defenseless. The Palestinians suffer for it, and the world community is silent except, like Israel, to shamefully call the victims the victimizers.

      Then there are the five million refugees in the Palestinian diaspora (by some estimates the number is seven million) including 260,000 internally displaced and living inside Israel. Those outside the country are denied the absolute universal "Right of Return" affirmed in UN Resolution 194 passed in December, 1948 resolving that "refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property....made good by the Governments or authorities responsible."

      This "Universal Right" was also established in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as various Geneva Conventions Israel won't recognize just as it ignores over five dozen UN resolutions condemning or censuring it for its actions against the Palestinians or other Arab people, deploring it for committing them, or demanding, calling on or urging the Jewish state to end them. One of them was UN Resolution 273 passed May, 1949 giving Israel UN membership conditional on its implementing Resolutions 181 of November, 1947 partitioning Palestine 56 - 44% in its favor and 194 passed December, 1948 giving Palestinians their absolute universally accepted "Right of Return."

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      Israel currently has over 400,000 Jews living in 121 Jewish-only settlements and 102 "outposts" on stolen Palestinian land violating Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention stating "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population in the territory it occupies." The number continues growing with deputy Jerusalem mayor Yehoshua Pollack announcing in May 20,000 new homes will be built in Arab East Jerusalem on more land annexed from its legal residents Israel is systematically ethnically cleasning toward making the entire city 100% Jewish.

      In addition, 500 more houses will be built in Abu Dis village, southeast of Jerusalem with new home construction aimed at creating territorial continuity between Jerusalem and "Gush Etzion" settlement bloc, south of Bethlehem, and between Jerusalem and "Beit Eil" settlement, north of Ramallah. Toward the same end, the Israeli government allocated $1.5 billion in US taxpayer aid May 13 to developing Jerusalem settlement neighborhoods to reduce an increasing Palestinian population in the city.

      At the same time, Palestinians in Salama and Fqaiqees villages, east and south of "Noghohot" settlement, west of Hebron, were ordered to stop building 10 houses and a mosque on their own land in their own country. Then on May 11, Israeli settlers in "Sousia" setttlement, south of Hebron, attacked Palestinian farmers on their agricultural land near the settlement without provocation.

      End the Illegal Occupation Now

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      -- 4170 Palestinian homes have been demolished according to a B'Tselem November 15, 2004 report titled "Through No Fault of Their Own." The Israeli Committee Against House Demotions (ICAHD) reports a far larger number calling them "the hallmark of the Occupation." It cites the demolition of around 12,000 Palestinian homes (on their own land in their own country) since June, 1967 to the present, leaving about 70,000 Palestinians "without shelter and traumatized."

      B'Tselem reports three types of demolitions:

      -- 1. As "clearing operations" to meet Israeli "military needs."

      -- 2. Administration demolitions of houses built "without a permit" meaning Israel won't let Palestinians build homes on their own land.

      -- 3. Demolitions for punitive reasons against Palestinians "suspected" of attacking Israeli (occupying) soldiers or civilians. In many cases, adjacent homes are destroyed as well.

      PCHR reports other destruction of land and property from September 29, 2000 through June, 2005 including 31,500 dunums (31.5 million square meters) of mostly agricultural land in Gaza or 10% of the territory's arable land total. Israel seized the land for illegal settlement development. In addition, 656 businesses, factories and schools were either destroyed or damaged over this period.

      -- World Bank data estimates Palestinian unemployment at 40%. The true figure, however, is much higher, at least 70% and likely higher still, while available employment is grossly inadequate to meet essential human needs in most cases. It's the result of Israeli and western political and economic sanctions imposed on the democratically elected Hamas government after January, 2006. It was the first time ever an occupied people were put under a virtual midieval siege in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention obligating the international community to protect an occupied civilian population. Instead, a state of belligerency was imposed causing chaos and mass human misery, deprivation, starvation, illness and disease so far unaddressed and worsening. Almost none of this is reported in the dominant western media.

      As early as June 28, 2002, PCHR reported 40 - 50% of Palestinians were living below the internationally recognized poverty line of $2 a day with the figure in Gaza 81%. Two-thirds of them were called the "new poor," having been impoverished since the outbreak of the Second Intifada September 29, 2000. Nearly five years later, the figures are far higher.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      In addition, a 2006 "Washington Report" piece by Shirl McArthur estimated the minimal amount of US aid to Israel since 1948 in an article titled "A Conservative Estimate of Total US Aid to Israel: $108 billion." Again, the true number is far higher. Over the same period to the present, US aid to the Palestinians was "zero" except what's supplied for "security" for Israel and now to aid quisling Fatah forces fight the democratically elected Hamas government Israel, Washington and the West won't recognize.

      -- Israel has been targeted by at least 65 UN resolutions ignoring them all. The Palestinians have been targeted by none.

      -- One Israeli corporal is held prisoner by the Palestinians. At least 10,756 Palestinians are now imprisoned by Israel, most held on "administrative" or no charge, and according to the B'Tselem Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories the great majority of them are abused or tortured. PCHR reports from 1967 through 1994 alone, 775,000 Palestinians were imprisoned for periods ranging from one week to life.

      The Israeli human rights organization HaMoked Center for the Defense of the Individual confirms this in an April, 2007 report it jointly published with B'Tselem titled "Utterly Forbidden - The Torture and Ill-Treatment of Palestinian Detainees. It's based on testimonies of dozens of Palestinians arrested, interrogated and tortured by Israel's ISA, formerly known as the General Security Service. In addition, even Israeli authorities openly admit using "exceptional" interrogation methods and "physical pressure" against Palestinian detainees that translated means "torture." However, B'Tselem reports the State Attorney's Office "covers up these illegal acts, thereby assisting in the breach of international law and of High Court of Justice's prohibitions."

      It hardly needs mentioning international laws ban torture for any reason, but it never deterred Israel or the US from using it freely. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights outlawed it in 1948. The Fourth Geneva Convention banned any form of "physical or mental coercion" in 1949 requiring detainees at all times to be treated humanely. The European Convention affirmed this in 1950, and in 1984, the UN Convention Against Torture became the first binding international instrument dealing exclusively with banning torture in any form for any reason. Israel and the US both have contempt for international law mutually affirming the other's right to act as it pleases with no protests heard in the West or hardly anywhere else.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      The "If Americans Knew" web site also publishes and keeps current shocking information on the daily toll in the OPT. Some of its disturbing figures affecting Palestinians from September 29, 2000 (the first day of the Second Intifada) to the present at the hands of Israeli forces are as follows:

      -- 934 Palestinian children have been killed in most cases while engaging in normal daily activities like going to school, playing, shopping, or being in their homes. PCHR reports a total of 4284 Palestinian deaths through March 23, 2007.

      -- A known total of 31,307 Palestinians have been injured, mostly civilians, and mostly under the same circumstances children were killed. The B'Tselem Israeli Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories reports these numbers are extremely conservative while the internationally respected Palestine Red Crescent Society reports much higher totals that are likely more accurate. In addition, these figures exclude large numbers of Palestinians who die when unable to reach medical care in time because of Israeli checkpoints, road closures, curfews and other restrictions on mobility in the OPT. Also, no accurate records are available on the large number of avoidable Palestinian deaths resulting from deprivation and/or disease following the first time ever imposition of sanctions on an occupied people from early 2006 to the present.

      -- The cite reports US financial aid to Israel is $7,023,288 per day, but the true number is far higher including:

      - around $3 billion or more annually in direct aid;

      - billions more in loans as needed;

      - millions annually for immigrant resettlement;

      - multi-billions in waved loan repayments;

      - billions more in military aid, financial help to develop Israel's defense industry, transfer of state-of-the-art technology and the latest US weapons, and US guarantees for Israel's access to oil;

      - $22 billion Israel got over the past 50 years through the sale of its below-market paying bonds that have financed half its development - meaning the colonization of annexed Palestinian land; military aid for its imperial aggressive wars; and still more as needed and requested.

      Tiny Israel today (with six million Jews) gets more US financial aid (in all direct and indirect forms) than all other countries in the world combined.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      The important Rafah International Crossing Point has been closed since June 25, 2006 except for three days. Because of this and other crossing point restrictions, markets aren't getting food, stores aren't getting goods, and hospitals don't have vital medical supplies, with most Palestinian patients unable to travel to them in Israel or the OPT anyway as needed. In addition, Palestinians have been prevented from fishing in the Mediterranean for nearly one year depriving them of their livelihood and the people of the food they harvest from the sea.

      In recent days, Israel launched heavy air strikes against Hamas government Gaza targets killing 36 mostly Palestinian civilians and wounding 97 others through May 21 as well as destroying dozens of homes and parliamentary sites. This is on top of renewed Israeli-instigated Fatah-Hamas armed clashes in Gaza killing 47 and injuring scores more through May 19. On May 18, independent Palestinian writer Laila El-Haddad wrote on the Electronic Intifada web site of a recent "terrifying 24 hours (with) sporadic gunfire and ghostly streets."

      She mentioned a phone call from her father describing a (US-supplied F-16-caused) "tremendous explosion (sending) intense shockwaves through our house....so powerful....it blasted off the windows from my cousin's home in the neighbourhood behind us. This attack was followed by another then another, and then another." There were six Israeli (F-16) air strikes in one morning with "Israeli tanks....amassing at Gaza's northern border, and unmanned Israeli drones whirring menacingly overhead in great numbers patrolling ghostly skies....preparing..for yet another strike against an already bleeding, burning, and battered Gaza" from Israeli terror attacks.

      Tony Karon, writing in the Electronic Intifada May 15, notes the current conflict "has assumed a momentum of its own" Palestinian leaders are unable to contain because Washington and Israel want it that way in the wake of Hamas' victory in the January, 2006 elections. He then adds ominously this may end up "turning Gaza into Mogadishu" just the way the Bush administration is now "busy turning Mogadishu into Mogadishu all over again."

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      In Gaza on May 15, IDF border forces killed a Palestinian National Security Forces officer fleeing Fatah-Hamas armed clashes with US and Israeli fingerprints all over this renewed fighting aimed at toppling the unity government. To do it, Fatah security forces were supplied with millions of dollars in funding, weapons and Egyptian-based training for this type operation ebbing and flowing with renewed fighting erupting on any pretext when cease-fires break down.

      On May 16, Israeli forces killed three Executive Force members of the Palestinian Ministry of Interior. They also wounded 27 other Palestinians (including two journalists and a civilian bystander) by Israeli air attacks on a Rafah Executive Force site. On the same day, two Hamas members were killed and three others wounded by air attacks in northern Gaza. Earlier on May 10, IDF forces near Khan Yunis burnt large areas of Palestinian agricultural land in Khuza'a village in a deliberate act of military vandalism.

      Also, on May 10, the IDF attacked Israeli solidarity and Palestinian civilian and international activists' peaceful demonstration protesting the construction of the Annexation/Apartheid wall in Bal'ein village west of Ramallah wounding three Palestinian adults, one child and a Swiss solidarity activist. On May 13, an Israeli settlement guard shot from "zero range" wounding a Palestinian taxi driver.

      From May 10 - 17, IDF forces conducted at least 26 military incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank arresting 41 civilians including seven children. That brings the number of Palestinians arrested in the West Bank alone this year to 1,164. Israeli forces also demolished one home and arrested two Palestinians in Gaza. Throughout this period, the IDF continued imposing a tightened siege on the OPT severely restricting movement including in occupied East Jerusalem and at border crossings through which essential humanitarian goods and services must have access but often don't when most needed.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      The article further explained Italian RAI News 24 satellite TV reported on a laboratory analysis of substances taken from victims alleging Israel used "dense inert metal explosives (DIME)" last summer in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and that a high concentration of carbon, copper, aluminum and tungsten points to a DIME weapon this time. RAI News 24 indicated military experts said DIME weapons are "carbon-encased missile(s) that shatter on impact into minuscule splinters (simultaneously exploding with) blades of energy-charged, heavy metal tungsten alloy (HMTA) powder (like) cobalt and nickel or iron, with a carbon fibre casing. It turns to dust on impact....burning and destroying....everything within a four-metre range."

      In addition to causing severe disabling and dismembering injuries, DIME weapons leave carcinogenic fallout (like depleted uranium - DU - or other toxic chemical pollutants) in areas targeted by them resulting in environmental contamination with virtually certain large increases in future cancers for people living close by and exposed.

      The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) on the ground in the territories documents it all daily, and its weekly report ending May 17 reads like all others depending on how horrific each week is with some hugely more so than others as Palestinian victims can attest. PCHR (and other groups) publish an account of daily incursions, assaults, shootings, targeted assassinations, aircraft intrusions and attacks, arrests, torture, home demolitions, restrictions on movement, crop destruction, land theft, and countless other types of harassment and humiliations making life in occupied Palestine repressive and unbearable for its residents who somehow resist and endure.

      In nearly all cases, Israeli actions are unprovoked or barely so like responding with overwhelming force to children throwing rocks or Palestinians defending their homes, neighborhoods or communities from repeated IDF incursions. Palestinians only have crude and light weapons against the world's fourth most powerful military with nearly every imaginable modern weapon including sophisticated nuclear ones and delivery systems to use them effectively. Specifically during this one week, IDF ground forces killed six Palestinians in Gaza and a baby in his mother's womb in the West Bank. They also wounded 36 Palestinians and a French solidarity activist.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      Life in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT)

      IDF occupation forces continue assaulting Palestinian civilians and property daily in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), and while November 8, 2006 wasn't typical, it shows how horrific some attacks have been. It began November 1 with Operation Autumn Clouds when Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) attacked Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza launching their largest assault on the territory since the late June Operation Summer Rains deadly one killing at least 240 mostly civilian men, women and children. In one November, 2006 week, 80 innocent civilians were dead, hundreds wounded, and many bodies afflicted with terribly disfiguring cuts, burns and hard to explain loss of limbs unseen before that had to have been from experimental bombs and shells likely containing radiation or other chemical materials able to burn human flesh. More on this below.

      The attack culminated November 8 when Israeli tanks shelled Palestinian homes killing at least 20 and wounding 60 more in what's now called the Beit Hanoun massacre. Ironically, or maybe intentionally, it happened the day after IDF forces withdrew following the week-long Operation Autumn Clouds operation that already devastated the town and its people. The Beit Hanoun massacre wasn't typical. But it highlights how, on any pretext at any time, Israeli forces freely attack defenseless Palestinians with unrestrained viciousness maybe just to show they can get away with almost anything.

      Mel Frykberg in the April 26 - May 2 issue of Al-Ahram Weekly reports some of the worst of what Israel is doing (unreported in the West) in his article called Israel's lab in Palestine. He wrote about Gaza-based doctors recently reporting severe wounds clearly made by horrific experimental weapons inflicting shocking damage with graphic web site pictures painful to view:

      -- disfiguring burns caused by intense heat requiring amputation;

      -- legs sliced from victims' bodies "as if a saw was used to cut through bone;"

      -- the absence of shrapnel in or near wounds but the presence of a powder-like substance on victims' bodies and internal organs identified by lab analysis as carbon and tungsten (microscopic shrapnel) with many affected patients dying several days later; and

      -- internal organs severely burned in the absence of external wounds.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      -- June 5: An international action day against militarization, wars and occupations in advance of the June G-8 summit in Germany.

      -- June 6 - 8: Protests against the G-8 by Palestinian and Israeli activists and Palestinian Solidarity groups across Europe where German authorities are already cracking down in advance of the June 6 - 8 summit of world leaders taking place at the German resort of Heiligendamm in the northern German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommen on the Baltic coast.

      Wherever George Bush travels, unprecedented levels of security are needed the result of intense worldwide anger against him and his administration showing up in mass public actions justifiably protesting his presence. As a result, the Heiligendamm resort is being turned into a luxurious armed military fortress with a huge protective wall around it costing $17 million a German newspaper called "the equivalent of a maximum security prison (in reverse) to keep people out."

      In addition, the Baltic Sea surrounding the resort will be patrolled by nine naval vessels supplementing 16,000 local police and 1100 soldiers guarding the area to keep protesters several miles from the meeting. Add to that the police state-style raids now ongoing targeting global justice and leftist organizations across the country on the phony pretext they're involved in the "creation of a terrorist organization."

      -- June 6 - 12: Protest action days against the occupation in Palestine, Israel and internationally.

      -- June 9: A mass rally in London along with a Global Day of Action Against the Occupation.

      -- June 10 - 11: A protest, teach-in and lobby in Washington, DC.

      All these actions across the world are intended to send Israel, G-8 governments and all nations around the world "a message they cannot ignore."

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Worldwide Solidarity Actions Opposing the Illegal Occupation

      To commemorate this infamous anniversary, the International Coordination Network on Palestine (ICNP) was launched at the annual UN civil society conference in 2006. It supports the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people under their banner, "The World Says No to Israeli Occupation." ICNP called for global days of protest June 9 - 10 demanding an end to the occupation; the realization of the Palestinians' inalienable rights including their right to self-determination; their Right to Return to their homeland; and to establish an independent, sovereign Palestinian state with its capital in Jerusalem where it rightfully belongs.

      ICNP is building nonviolent global action campaigns for boycotts, divestment and economic and political sanctions. In addition, it engages in a wide range of educational and cultural activities with the same aims in mind. It insists governments across the world stop providing Israel economic, political and military support and work instead together to end an occupation that never should have been tolerated in the first place. It wants it replaced with a "just and lasting peace."

      Hundreds of other organizations, networks and groups across the world are also mobilizing for a global protest day June 9. One of them is the "Occupation 40" coalition calling for "six days" of actions (from June 5 - 10) marking 40 hellish years of occupation. In addition, a Global Day of Action was called for on Saturday, June 9. The coalition is comprised of grassroots Israeli groups and organizations, peace activists, artists, student groups, internal Palestinian refugees, anarchists, animal rights activists, and leftist groups including socialists and communists. There will be a six-day convergence in Israel including demonstrations, direct actions, discussions and cultural events.

      "Occupation 40" is also calling for international direct actions against the illegal occupation from June 5 - 10 including economic punishment against corporations profiting from an occupation that cost Palestinians their homeland. The planned agenda for these days is as follows:

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Israel used what it got then for its one-sided blitzkrieg ending June 10 with Israeli forces completing the job left unfinished following their 1948 "War of Independence." They took the remaining 22% of ancient Palestine comprising Gaza and the West Bank, and on June 6, 2007 will have held the territories for 40 repressive years of the longest continuous illegal occupation in the world under which Palestinians (including Israeli citizens and Palestinian Christians) lost their personal, political and economic freedoms under Israeli rule affording those rights only to Jews.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Israel is in breach of the Geneva Convention.

      Israel is in breach of many United Nations articles.

      ====================

      Jewish forces seized 78% of British Mandatory Palestine establishing the state of Israel May 14 when the Mandate ended. It was 40% more territory than UN Resolution 181 of November, 1947 allowed with a 56 - 44% division that already gave Israel most of the fertile land, nearly all urban and rural territory, and 400 of over 1000 Palestinian villages their residents lost by UN mandate, with no right of appeal, to the Jewish population comprising one-third of the total at that time.
      ==================

      The 1948 negotiated cease-fire line became known as the "Green Line." Egypt occupied Gaza, and Jordan controlled the West Bank. It was Israel's moment of triumph. The war lasted six months, expelling and killing about 800,000 Palestinians. It destroyed 531 Palestinian villages, 11 urban neighborhoods, and was a clear case of ethnic cleansing international law calls a crime against humanity. Guilty Israeli leaders were never held to account for it or forced to admit what, in fact, they indisputably did according to recently declassified Israeli archival material Israeli historian Ilan Pappe used for his important new book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Noted British journalist and documentary filmmaker John Pilger calls him "Israel's bravest, most principled, most incisive historian."


      =============================

    • 3 years ago
  • mendokusai
    • 0
      mendokusai  
    • lol its even less complicated than that "bud"

      so long as there is oppression, there will never be peace

      the state of israel is a daily testimony to that truth

    • 3 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • Mendo - you almost have something there, but still missing the point. Israel is there to stay. America took the land away from the Indians - and so many other countries do too. Winners should not be judged. But if you insist, they I will resort to a thousands of years ago claim of the Jews to this land - even if you don't believe in G_d and that he gave them this land, it was theirs loooooong before islam was even born. Now, as to your argument about Israel giving Palestinians and Lebaneze shit - dude - you really don't know what you are talking about. RETALIATION good old buddy. When so many of your citizens are killed, displaced, kidnapped and threatened, even the most benevolent government is going to be tempted to hit back. Back off Israel, stop the constant provocations and threats and enjoy peace and prosperity. Live as neighbours and not as enemies - Israel is more than willing - they even gave up the lands, settlements, developed properties, etc. So what do these morons do - first, they destroy everything. So they can continue living in shit? So that they can continue to solicit the pity of people like you, bud!!! It's as simple as that!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • Abraham99
    • 0
      Abraham99  
    • How can there be two states if the Palestinians do not recognize that Israel exists? They feel the United Nations made a mistake, so therefore, they feel that there is no place called Israel. So, why should Israel try to have a 2 state deal if the Arabs there feel there is only one state called Palestine. Why bother with the fake process called "negotiating?"
      Netanyahu is right. It's like why should the husband and wife agree to be together if the wife says there is only a wife and there is no husband?

    • 3 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • Matt - in times of military confrontation, only fools supply their enemy. It's like us sending more planes and bombs to Japan after Pearl Harbour. The Palestinains are biting the hand that feeds them. Lay down the arms, build schools, hospitals, invest in infrastructure, accept Israel as a sovereign country - and all will be hunky-dory. The HamazRoller has inundated everyone with his propaganda shit - he has a shitstorm every time a blog appears dealing with this subject. Stop eating those prunes already! We got it - you are Hamaz, you are a palestinian who can't bear to have Jews live in Israel - you want to push them all into the sea. Got it. It's not gonna happen - you will die trying - I promiss you. There were many civilizations and peoples who tried to rid the world of the "eternal jew". They are still here - and they will be - so why don't you figure out how to make peace with and reconcile this hate in your head - or it will drive you mad, mad, mad!!!
      Matt, Stalin, Brezhnev, etc. were also "democratically" elected leaders - catch my drift?
      Hamaz has the destruction of a neighbouring country in their very charter. How do you reconcile that? They teach their kids to hate the Jew from early years. In contrast - there are Arab kids in Israeli schools, there are Mosques in Israel - functioning ones. Arabs (muslims) are in the Israeli Knesset (parliament). Druse and Christians serve in the Israeli military. Tolerance, diversity, democracy, freedom - are some of the words to describe Israel. Others are survival, struggle, suffering - look at the huge muslim neighbourhood around them - Hamaz, Hezbollah, Iran, Saudi, etc.
      Surely you don't expect them to lay down their weapons and die peacefully? HighRoller does - but his dreams will only make him shit his pants at night... Sorry - I just can't take this blatant BS!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • mendokusai
    • 0
      mendokusai  
    • igordy:

      igordy writes in his post above:

      Surely you don't expect them to lay down their weapons and die peacefully?

      and yet the palestinians and lebanese are expected to happily take israel's shit? the "terrorism" you refer to is just as much self-defense to the palestinians and lebanese whom the israelis have been oppressing and occupying since 1948. this is the essence of israel's problem and the reason it will never enjoy real peace unless they kill off the entire population that they displaced.

      israelis shouldnt have to lay down their weapons and die peacefully but the palestinians and lebanese should? what was that about blatant BS?

    • 3 years ago
  • Mattattack
    • 0
      Mattattack  
    • igordy:

      Gordy, I don't know what sort of things you've been reading, but surely they are not up to date. Hamas, the PLO, Iran, Lebanon and obviously the nations that hold peace treaties with Israel ALL have stated they are willing to recognize Israel. In the Hamas charter, you are correct about it's violent implications, but that has been renounced by the groups leaders since then.

      Stop with the THE ARABS WANNA KILL US THAT'S WHY WE HAVE TO KEEP INVADING THEM! Argument. Israeli leaders over the past decades have stated they want to partners in Eretz-Israel (sp?), that the intention is to create a Jewish majority in the state of Israel, and the fate of the territories will ONLY been decided by Israel. They are the biggest opponent to a two-state settlement.

      Another thing, while there are Arabs in Israel, they are treated as second and third-class citizens, with tax money distributed very poorly to the Arab/Muslim communities in the nation.

      Gordy, if the left-wingers were mandated a huge portion of the U.S to be called Communistopia, and rounded us all into the state Montana, controlled all access in or out and regularly kidnapped civilians and held them without charge, regularly shut off water and power to your neighborhoods and hospitals, and used any attempt to fight back as a pre-texts for even more large scale violence, would you think everything is going to be "hunky-dory" if you put your weapons down?

    • 3 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • igordy:

      Matt - not only do I not know what you are reading - I am not sure what planet you are from. None of those entities accept Israel's right to exist - NONE. Abbas just said it 2 days ago, Hamaz never renegged on their charter - that's NONSENSE what you wrote above - pure nonsense. The day Arabs lay down their weapons, there will be peace in the ME. The day Israel lays down her weapons - there will be no more Israel. Now that might suit some, like the Spammaster roller here - but that is simply not going to happen. If G_d forbid Israel's very existence will be in jeopardy, a final and tragic solution will be implemented - and there will be no humanly inhabitable Middle East. Not the sort of thing anyone sane would ever want to happen - thus in Israel's case - nukes are a best deterrent and insurance for its survival!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • Mattattack
    • 0
      Mattattack  
    • Funny, posting propaganda to oppose propaganda. It fails to mention several key factors:

      Hamas was democratically elected in Palestine.

      When Israel withdrew from Gaza, they still control all access in or out, and often have cut off power, water and necessary supplies to Palestinians when they wish to put pressure on them.

      The word terrorist should be banned from intelligent conversation, as it is extremely subjective. War is the terrorism of the rich, terrorism is the war of the poor.

    • 3 years ago
  • akamaial
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • At the heart of Israel's strategy is the policy adopted three decades ago of "maintaining the demographic balance" in Jerusalem. In 1972, the number of Jews in the west of the city outnumbered the Arabs in the east by nearly three to one. The government decreed that that equation should not be allowed to change, at least not in favour of the Arabs.

      "The mantra of the past 37 years has been 'maintaining the demographic balance', which doesn't mean forcing Palestinians to leave," says Daniel Seidemann, a Jewish Israeli lawyer who has spent years fighting legal cases on behalf of Jerusalem's Arab residents. "It means curtailing their ability to develop by limiting construction to the already developed areas, by largely preventing development in new areas and by taking 35% [of Palestinian-owned land in greater East Jerusalem] and having a massive government incentive for [Jews] to build up that area."

      The political decision to discriminate against Arabs was an open but rarely acknowledged secret.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      Israelis are genuinely bewildered that anyone might see similarities between their society and the old South Africa. Where, they ask, are the signs directing "Jews" and "non-Jews" to match the "petty apartheid" of segregated buses, toilets and just about every other facility in Pretoria and Johannesburg.

      There are conspicuous differences, of course. Arab Israelis have the vote, although they were prevented from forming their own political parties until the 1980s. They are mostly equal under the law and these days the Israeli courts generally protect their rights. Jews are a majority in Israel; white South Africans were a minority. And Israel spent the first decades of its existence fighting for its life.

      click on guardian newspaper LINK further up to read on.......

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued

      "Like the struggle against apartheid, the struggle of the Palestinian people against Israeli occupation of their country enjoys enormous support from the global community," he said. "Therefore a more concrete expression of this support by global societies to this campaign is timely and fitting."

      Anglican, Presbyterian and other churches have backed sanctions against Israel. Last year, one of the UK's university teaching unions endorsed a boycott of two Israeli universities, before reversing its decision amid a torrent of criticism over the reasoning behind the move.

      The Israeli government has condemned boycotts as anti-semitism and an attempt to "delegitimise" the Jewish state. It asks why only Israel, a democratic country, is singled out for sanctions. A few protests are not a bandwagon, but underpinning Israeli hostility is a fear, expressed in a secret Israeli foreign ministry report, that Israel's standing abroad could sink so low in the coming years that it might find itself on a collision course with Europe which could see Israel as isolated as the apartheid regime and with serious economic consequences.

      Ariel Sharon's withdrawal of Jewish settlers from the Gaza strip last year, and the relinquishing of direct Israeli control over that territory, temporarily dampened some of the criticism. But even as the Gaza pullout was under way, Israel was entrenching its control of those parts of the West Bank it wants to retain, using the barrier to mark out an intended future border that would carve up the territory, and expanding Jewish settlements it intends to annex - a strategy that, if carried through by Sharon's successors, is likely to strengthen the comparisons with apartheid and fuel calls for sanctions.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • continued:

      As far back as 1961, Hendrik Verwoerd, the South African prime minister and architect of the "grand apartheid" vision of the bantustans, saw a parallel. "The Jews took Israel from the Arabs after the Arabs had lived there for a thousand years. Israel, like South Africa, is an apartheid state," he said. It is a view that horrifies and infuriates many Israelis.

      A prominent Israeli political scientist, Gerald Steinberg, responded to an invitation to appear on a panel at a Jerusalem cultural centre to debate "Is Israel the new apartheid?" by denouncing the organiser, a South African-born Jew, for even posing the question.

      "As you are undoubtedly aware, the pro-Palestinian and anti-semitic campaign to demonise Israel focuses on the entirely false and abusive analogy with South Africa. Using the term 'apartheid' to apply to Israel's legitimate responses to terror and the threat of annihilation both demeans the South African experience, and is the most immoral of charges against the right of the Jewish people to self-determination," he replied.

      Many Israelis recoil at the suggestion of a parallel because it stabs at the heart of how they see themselves and their country, founded after centuries of hatred, pogroms and ultimately genocide. If anything, many of Israel's Jews view themselves as having more in common with South Africa's black population than with its oppressors. Some staunch defenders of Israel's policies past and present say that even to discuss Israel in the context of apartheid is one step short of comparing the Jewish state to Nazi Germany, not least because of the Afrikaner leadership's fascist sympathies in the 1940s and the disturbing echoes of Hitler's Nuremberg laws in South Africa's racist legislation.

      Yet the taboo is increasingly challenged. As Israel's justice minister, Tommy Lapid, said, Israel's defiance of international law in constructing the West Bank barrier could result in it being treated as a pariah like South Africa. Malaysia's prime minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, has called for a campaign against Israel of the kind used to pressure South Africa.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • The 'apartheid wall'

      There are few places in the world where governments construct a web of nationality and residency laws designed for use by one section of the population against another. Apartheid South Africa was one. So is Israel.

      Comparisons between white rule in South Africa and Israel's system of control over the Arab peoples it governs are increasingly heard. Opponents of the vast steel and concrete barrier under construction through the West Bank and Jerusalem dubbed it the "apartheid wall" because it forces communities apart and grabs land. Critics of Ariel Sharon's plan to carve up the West Bank, apportioning blobs of territory to the Palestinians, draw comparisons with South Africa's "bantustans" - the nominally independent homelands into which millions of black men and women were herded.

      An Israeli human rights organisation has described segregation of West Bank roads by the military as apartheid. Arab Israeli lawyers argue anti-discrimination cases before the supreme court by drawing out similarities between some Israeli legislation and white South Africa's oppressive laws. Desmond Tutu, the former archbishop of Cape Town and chairman of South Africa's truth and reconciliation commission, visited the occupied territories three years ago and described what he found as "much like what happened to us black people in South Africa".

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Worlds apart
      The Guardian, Monday February 6 2006
      Chris McGreal
      Israelis have always been horrified at the idea of parallels between their country, a democracy risen from the ashes of genocide, and the racist system that ruled the old South Africa. Yet even within Israel itself, accusations persist that the web of controls affecting every aspect of Palestinian life bears a disturbing resemblance to apartheid. After four years reporting from Jerusalem and more than a decade from Johannesburg before that, the Guardian's award-winning Middle East correspondent Chris McGreal is exceptionally well placed to assess this explosive comparison. Here we publish the first part of his two-day special (...)
      (...)capital". The bureaucrats followed in the army's footsteps, registering and measuring Israel's largest annexation of territory since its victory over the Arab (...)

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Vital distinctions over anti-semitism
      The Guardian, Tuesday March 7 2006
      David Clark argues correctly (Accusations of anti-semitic chic are poisonous intellectual thuggery, March 6) that criticism of Israel's oppressive occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem cannot be reduced to anti-semitism. I know of few people who claim that it should be. Clark provides a mirror image of uncritical defenders of Israeli policy when he assures us that (...)
      (...)March 6) that criticism of Israel's oppressive occupation of the...was created following the Nazi genocide: then Jews - including

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • Slander is spoken.

      Do you mean LIBEL. Truth is the best defence of libel.....you cannot libel someone for publishing the truth.

      Israel has been accused of GENOCIDE by the International community.

      =================

      Criticise - don't demonise
      guardian.co.uk, Friday February 9 2007
      David Hirsh
      Antony Lerman argues for the "Independent Jewish Voices" statement as follows: Pro-Israel and Zionist groups have interpreted intensified criticism of Israel and anti-Zionism as the expression of a "new anti-semitism". The IJV initiative leans towards the view that this charge is far too often used in an attempt to stifle strong criticism of Israeli policies. Let's examine (...)
      (...)as follows: Pro-Israel and Zionist groups...Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Now Pappe (...)

      ===================

      Iran, Israel and the future of the Middle East
      The Guardian, Tuesday November 1 2005
      Although Dr Nur Masalha (Letters, October 28) condemns Iran's President Ahmadinejad's comments, his letter indicates that he too believes in a "world without Zionism". His talk of a bi-national state is at odds with the accepted view that a two-state solution is the only forward, and would also lead to the end of the Jewish state. Furthermore, his claim that Israel is trying (...)
      (...)his claim that Israel is trying "quietly...politicide, the latter genocide. A bi-national...Iran has been accused of supporting (...)

    • 3 years ago
  • nataraja
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • nataraja:

      Happy to prove you disingenuous:

      The legal definition of genocide

      The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

      Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

      1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

      2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

      Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.
      Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide

      "Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

      (a) Killing members of the group;
      (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
      (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
      (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
      (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

      Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

      (a) Genocide;
      (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
      (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
      (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
      (e) Complicity in genocide. "

      http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

      What Israel is doing and has been doing to the Palestinians for decades is indeed genocide.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Israel is a state commiting GENOCIDE annually....
      2006 in Lebanon.
      2007 in Gaza
      2008 in Gaza
      2009 in Gaza

      ======================

      As early as June 28, 2002, PCHR reported 40 - 50% of Palestinians were living below the internationally recognized poverty line of $2 a day with the figure in Gaza 81%. Two-thirds of them were called the "new poor," having been impoverished since the outbreak of the Second Intifada September 29, 2000. Nearly five years later, the figures are far higher.

    • 3 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • I don't see how an official recognition of a right to exist is anytihing other than Step 1 in making peace with your neighbour. Conversely, if one doesn't recognize a country's right to exist - that opens the door for wars, terrorism, piracy, etc. And what exactly is questionable here? The source here is Palestinian News. Who reads or watches PNN? Our good old friend highroller - a staunch supported or Israel's right to exist - hahaha. Salam alaikum and Shalom to you!

    • 3 years ago
  • akamaial
    • 0
      akamaial [removed]  
    • Jihad watch
      4/28/2009

      Mahmoud Abbas: "A Jewish state, what is that supposed to mean?"
      ~Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state poses temporal and religious problems for Abbas & Co.: Acknowledging and accepting Israel's Jewish identity disqualifies Muslims' future claims on the land for negotiation, armed conflict, the claim to a "right of return," and so forth. Doing so would also acknowledge the historical identity of the region as a Jewish homeland (as opposed to the revisionist story of the allegedly "uncorrupted" followers of a proto-Muslim Abraham). Lastly, it accepts something other than Islamic law as legitimate, which is out of step with the fundamental reason for waging jihad: Imposing Islamic dominion and law.
      ~"Mideast: Abbas refuses to recognise Israel as Jewish state," from Adnkronos International, April 27:
      ~Ramallah, 27 April (AKI) - Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas on Monday dismissed calls by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to recognise Israel as a Jewish state. He also said a halt to Israel's continuing expansion of illegal Jewish settlements inside the West Bank was a prerequisite for resuming peace talks.
      ~"A Jewish state, what is that supposed to mean?," said Abbas, quoted by Israeli media. "You can call yourselves as you like, but I don't accept it and I say so publicly."
      ~He also said it was not his job to define or name the Israeli state.
      ~"Name yourself, it's not my business. Name yourself the Hebrew Socialist Republic. All I know is that there is the state of Israel, in the borders of 1967, not one centimetre more, not one centimetre less. Anything else, I do not accept."
      ~Many observers believe the so called 'green line' – the pre-1967 Six-Day War ceasefire line between Israel and Jordan – should be the basis for an international border between Israel and the West Bank in the creation of a future Palestinian state.
      ~Israeli daily Haaretz said last week that Netanyahu wanted to impose the precondition of recognition of Israel as a Jewish state in order to resume peace negotiations.
      ~However, it is believed such recognition would block the Palestinians demand for the "right of return" of millions of refugees who fled or were expelled by Jewish forces, during the establishment of Israel in 1948 and subsequent wars. The refugees are now scattered throughout the Middle East.
      ~Israel's hardline foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman said last Thursday that the right of return is not up for discussion....
      ~And it should not be, unless the right of return for descendants of Jews expelled from Medina and countless other non-Muslims expelled from present-day Muslim lands is also on the table.

    • 3 years ago
  • nataraja
  • Mattattack
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • For 40 years under occupation on one-fifth of their original land and nearly 60 years after the "Nakba," Palestinians are forced to endure the most appalling repression no one should have to face for a single day. Five million of them, including 1.4 million Israeli citizens, are denied all rights afforded Jews only and are subjected to daily abuse and neglect along with regular IDF assaults against which they're defenseless. The Palestinians suffer for it, and the world community is silent except, like Israel, to shamefully call the victims the victimizers.

      Then there are the five million refugees in the Palestinian diaspora (by some estimates the number is seven million) including 260,000 internally displaced and living inside Israel. Those outside the country are denied the absolute universal "Right of Return" affirmed in UN Resolution 194 passed in December, 1948 resolving that "refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property....made good by the Governments or authorities responsible."

      This "Universal Right" was also established in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as various Geneva Conventions Israel won't recognize just as it ignores over five dozen UN resolutions condemning or censuring it for its actions against the Palestinians or other Arab people, deploring it for committing them, or demanding, calling on or urging the Jewish state to end them. One of them was UN Resolution 273 passed May, 1949 giving Israel UN membership conditional on its implementing Resolutions 181 of November, 1947 partitioning Palestine 56 - 44% in its favor and 194 passed December, 1948 giving Palestinians their absolute universally accepted "Right of Return."

      ===================================
      On April 17, 2009, Ramattan News agency reported that Israel’s foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman said that the new Israeli cabinet is forming a new policy on peace negotiations with the Palestinians. This new policy, according to Lieberman, ‘will be presented to the international community once completed’.
      The statements made by Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Lieberman is just another example how the Israeli leadership has no intention of ever establishing peace with its neighbors.

      The former president of the Palestinians, the late Mr. Arafat recognized Israel rights to exist. Both Mr. Arafat and the late Mr. Rabin, Former Israeli Prime Minister, signed the agreement, which was supervised by the then US president Clinton. The Israeli and US leaders that emerged afterwards and rather than capitalizing on this window of opportunity, elected t call Mr. Arafat ‘irrelevant’ and ‘not partner in peace’.
      The Russian initiative to bring the situation in the Middle East to the UN Security Council seems to be the only way to establishing peace in the area. I do believe the time is ripe to establish peace in the Middle East. The whole world must come together not to enforce a peaceful agreement between the two rivals, but by empowering both sides in having a peaceful agreement.

      The whole world has accepted the two state solutions, why can’t Israel’s leaders do the same? The Israeli leaders must step up to the plate and act as concerned leaders whose only interest lies within securing peace and economic stability for their own people and their future descendants.

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:

top videos