Community | April 28, 2009 | 5 comments

Life cycle assessments measure water's impact on Earth's ecosystems for the first time

Image
JanforGore
Despite water’s significance, modeling how freshwater consumption for drinking, industrial manufacturing, and agriculture has affected ecosystems, human health, and the depletion of nonrenewable freshwater resources has been overlooked. In a new ES&T study (DOI 10.1021/es802423e), researchers take the traditional life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach one huge step beyond current practices with a model that incorporates water consumption.LCA models were created to address problems in industrialized nations, and most of these countries don’t experience human-health risks due to water scarcity, the authors note. Recently, researchers have started to use LCA models to manage diminishing resources in developing countries. To incorporate water consumption into the LCA process, Stephan Pfister, Annette Koehler, and Stefanie Hellweg at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich’s (ETH Zurich’s) Institute of Environmental Engineering started from scratch: they created units of measure for water consumption that are compatible with the many values for energy and resource use that appear in an internationally recognized LCA method. “For water use, this hadn’t been done, ever,” says Hellweg, who is a professor of ecological systems design at ETH Zurich.

For example, the team interpreted a well-known value established by the World Health Organization in LCA models and applied it to water use. The disability-adjusted life year is a value that expresses the number of years a person's life will be shortened as a result of disease or premature death. The team also adapted an indicator applied to address ecosystem impacts and known as PDF (potentially disappeared fraction of species) to express how water impacts species.LCAs routinely rely on aggregated data to represent large areas. But the ecological impacts of water use depend on regional factors, such as freshwater availability, water infrastructure, rainfall, and consumption patterns at a specific location. The team used a geographic information system to gather regional data and divided large rivers, such as the Nile and the Mississippi, into subcatchments. “The watershed level is more appropriate for the assessment, because hydrological processes are connected within watersheds,” Pfister says.

In the paper, Pfister and colleagues demonstrate their model with a case study of a process that is water-intensive worldwide: cotton production. They began with data from the “virtual water” database developed by researchers in The Netherlands. A relatively new idea, virtual water describes the amount of water that evaporates during agricultural use. Specifically, the database is an inventory of the water consumed for agricultural use for many crops in most countries.The team found that the impacts from water consumption in the cotton industry vary according to country: Egypt’s water supply experiences the highest level of damage (77%) from cotton production, whereas Brazil experiences the lowest level of damage (0%), followed by the U.S. (4%).



The damages to ecological systems from overconsumption of water are illustrated in this world map (yellow represents low impacts, navy high impacts).
Figure 3, PFISTER ET AL.

LCA's finally measure water consumption
Catherine Cooney
Environ. Sci. Technol., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/es901078v
Publication Date (Web): April 22, 2009
Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Earth and Science,   Sustainable Agriculture,   2 more
  2. tags:
    News Green Earth and Science Environment 14 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

5 comments // Life cycle assessments measure water's impact on Earth's ecosystems for the first time

  • artemis6
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • We need to protect our world's water supplies and getting people who can make a difference together is a good step.

    • 4 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • For sure we have done much to shorten the life cycle not only of our water, but ourselves. It is a dilemma I believe we are destined to come to terms with now.

    • 4 years ago
  • darkhorsejim
    • 0
      darkhorsejim  
    • Over the last 50 years, the Petro-Chemical industries, including Big Pharma, have been releasing unnatural & poisonous chemicals in their processes & products, which have now permeated our earth, air & water. Once these substances enter the ecosystem & breakdown, there is virtually no way to undo these molecular structures, making them permanent. We then ingest these hard to avoid manmade combinations & build up sickening levels of toxins in our body unless precautions are taken. Plastics, usually derived from petroleum, are now becoming one of the most damaging & widespread global problems. Our bodies, and oceans, are definitely not designed to process or assimilate petroleum products. It took some time for the EPA to acquire real power in order to make decisions with positive outcomes for the consumer at the expense of big business.

      Obviously going organic is a good start. But this has been going on for decades. For example, people are ingesting massive amounts of “second-hand” medications since we’ve been pissing in the well far longer than should have been tolerated. Our current municipal water suppliers are not even capable of removing these health endangering, immune-system weakening substances. As the consumers, ironically we’re challenged to take responsibility that what we eat & drink is healthy from the same industries fouling our environment with staggering amounts of toxins. So a big problem lies in water filtration or treatment in order to minimize the unhealthy effects passed on to consumers & sickening us at an unprecedented rate.

    • 4 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • It is good to finally see life cycle assessments being done for water use. The impact of water use on our ecosystems should be of chief concern in every area of the world as water is the one resource we cannot live without.

      More water is wasted(and polluted) in industry, yet they are not accountable for the water they use. And even though these assessments are not ironclad based on changing factors over time, they at least give a good idea of what is being used, wasted, and how best to conserve water in different regions of the world experiencing different effects regarding that usage due to population, population growth, deforestation, agriculture, and now chiefly, climate change which is precipitating drought and melting glaciers more rapidly which absolutely effects the life cycle of water and all that depend on it.

      It is time to take our use of water much more seriously. It is the lynchpin of our survival on this planet, and if we are to have any success at all in preserving our planet for ourselves and those to come how we manage water is essential to that success and preservation.

    • 4 years ago
more from Community:

top videos