Christians support torture more than non-believers
source: http://bombsfromtheleftcoast.blogspot.com/2009/05/christians-support-torture-more-than.html
-
-
- unimatrix0
- added this
Results from a new Pew Forum poll show that evangelicals and Catholics are more likely than other groups (and more likely than average) to approve of "the use of torture against suspected terrorists." Those most likely to approve of torture some or most of the time are white evangelical Christians. Those least likely are "unaffiliated" and those who rarely or never attend church services.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Follow link to Pew Forum Poll http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=156
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you feel about torture? Is torture ever the right thing to do? Why are Christians more likely to support torture than non-believers?
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Culture, US Politics, 2 more
-
- tags:
- News, News and Politics, Culture, US, 5 more
-
- recommended by:
- ClipsFC,
- ras_menelik,
- Vierotchka
-
-
mrop
-
I don't think religion has anything to do with it. Zealots have a tendency to employ a narrow focus because it is easier -- mental laziness. It requires far less intellectual effort to appear "convinced" and "justified" in any dogma, than to actually "think" for yourself. Therefore torture as a means to achieve "proof" of any behaviour outside the approval of that dogma seems reasonable.
There is an old Confucian saying, "He who strikes the first blow, looses the debate." Torture is "violence". Violence is always the first tool of the ignorant. - 3 years ago
-
mrop
-
-
jaegerbomb2009
-
I am a christian and i do not support torture.
why slander other peoples beliefs ?? - 3 years ago
-
jaegerbomb2009
-
-
JohnA
-
Yes, and Muslims are so much more tolerant. Give me a break.
- 3 years ago
-
JohnA
-
-
ras_menelik
-
JohnA:
All fanatics are the same
Religion if properly understood is not about belief but about behavior
- 3 years ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
02
-
Yeah, if you could only make sense to religious people - right?
Try to remind those Muslim kids that their religion really means love and they won't get 59 virgins waiting for them after they blow people up.Anybody in religions: Wouldn't you rather be doing something important?
Worse than drugs for throwing your life away. -Sorry, but true.
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
ras_menelik
-
If you love the creator, you love the creation!
"Religion if properly understood is not about belief but about behavior" Al Gore said this crediting Karen Armstrong for it.
I'd like to quote her to:
“I wish that you would help with the creation, launch and propagation of a Charter for Compassion, crafted by a group of leading inspirational thinkers from the three Abrahamic traditions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam and based on the fundamental principles of universal justice and respect.”
- 3 years ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
dArknedTruth
-
And to add to my previous comment many pple who try to kill christians for speaking the truth are those do not believe in Jesus. A good example is going to China. If someone assumes that your a christian you can be instantly killed on the spot or taken off to jail. Several other countries are similar if not as worse.
- 3 years ago
-
dArknedTruth
-
-
unimatrix0
-
dArknedTruth:
What about all the people Christians have killed for not believing in Jesus? You leave out a great deal of history.
Christians have been killing people for 2,000 years for not believing the superstitious non-sense that is Christianity.
- 3 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
dArknedTruth
-
In case someone didn’t know, the same people who wanted to kill Jesus were the ones who followed the traditional ways of running the church. (“Christianity” actually got its name for the people who followed Jesus not those who simply went to church.) Most of the (possibly all) scripture quotes everyone made were of the Old Testament in the Bible (which means before Jesus time). This means that there were severe strict rules back then. Of course there were no Bibles. Barely anyone could read anyway, except the wealthy or popes. So pretty much 1 out of about 100 people back then were able to always do what God wanted them to do. Before Jesus, we did not have an easy chance to go to heaven. What’s worse is while there were few solidly good believers trying to influence others, there were also those who spoke lies about God and constantly tricked multitudes of people. According to the law, those who deceived people and those repeatedly disobeyed God was sentenced to death. When Jesus came (New Testament) he made a way that people do not need to be killed instantly because of sin. In the Bible Jesus actually prevented this prostitute from being stoned to death by the church leaders because she was suppose to be sentenced to death for her actions.
All of his disciples where people who would be considered sinners. Because Jesus did not act upon traditional ways, people of the church (usually the priests) and other influential people who sought to kill Jesus. The thing is Jesus knew this would happen. In fact his goal on this earth was to live a perfect life and make a way that everyone can be saved if they believed and followed him; No matter who we are, what our past looks like, what race, gender, etc. Jesus died on that cross because he knew that if he didn’t, many people would perish without a fighting chance.
The cross symbolizes the price of our sins. It should have been us dying for our actions, but Jesus didn’t want that. After Jesus died everyone who followed Jesus were called Christians because they were “Christ-followers.” And yes they were killed as well because they followed Jesus. Yet the news of Jesus was spreading like wild fire, so it didn’t end.
Just a brief list of people who died while believing in Jesus: John the Baptist- decapitated while in a prison cell; Paul-eventually killed yet ran most of his life from people trying to kill him, several times was imprisoned, stoned, flogged, you name it.; before Paul followed Jesus he witnessed a man named Stephen who was being stoned and died for preaching about the love of Christ.; Just recently I heard a story about a school teacher in America who shot his student for believing in Jesus after he told her to stop. In a popular book called “Jesus Freaks” a little girl was shot (I believe in the head, can’t remember) along with her family for refusing to spit on the bible….. She was at least six years old.
So no, Christians do not crave to kill people. To bear the name of a Christian alone brings on a meaning that Jesus had warned his disciples about before he died: That the world will hate Christians because it first hated him. Only through Christ we are saved, not laws and rules. So that means as long as Christianity exists, Christians are hunted down by people who want Christianity to stop, not necessarily directing all the blame to the general population of non believers. But because we care about people’s salvation we continue to share the gospel even though we are risking our freedom. - 3 years ago
-
dArknedTruth
-
-
Vierotchka
-
dArknedTruth:
All this is a matter of faith, and of misinterpretation. There was no concept of damnation or salvation before decades after Christ, and the first Church Fathers taught Universal Salvation - i.e. that everyone, irrespective of their religions, beliefs, absence of beliefs, and actions, is de facto saved, without exception. I believe it was Origen who taught that even Satan would be forgiven and saved.
Here are some links you might want to explore:
http://frimmin.com/faith/godislove.php
- 3 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
02
-
Yeah, how boring it would be. There only so many times you can see another hippie talking about "I'm the one"
New CD please.
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
blaino
-
religion is so ass backwards. I swear to jesus christ almighty these people dont know the first thing about being christlike.
They worship a symbol rather than practice his teachings, its a shame too because if more people were christlike this world would be a more tolerant/peaceful place to live.
- 3 years ago
-
blaino
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Of course they do - they invented most of the torture techniques in existence.
- 3 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
02
-
Vierotchka:
The Indians weren't bad.
Japanese, too. - 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Vierotchka:
And the Chinese, of course.
- 3 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
02
-
Vierotchka:
I dunno. I'm sure they've had their moments - but the Japanese have placed real know-how to the subject.
And then the Indians had a good long history from which to call. A deep well from which draw.
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
02
-
Vierotchka:
See, another aspect for the Japanese - at times - was they could string you up, you thinking you would hold out as long as possible; - but along about the time you were clinging to your last gasp, they'd inform you that not only were you not surviving this anyway - they weren't going to let you die until you ratted out everybody you ever knew.
That's when you knew how it was really going down.
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
joyrexj5
-
why dont we assume the middle east religious groups are the ones Most likley to inflict torture for they are the damn TERRORISTS! gah people
- 3 years ago
-
joyrexj5
-
-
02
-
I'm flying over this thread with my anti-religion bomb, bomb-bay doors open, - wind blasting. Current City passes below.
Is this the place - or should I fly on? - 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
nakedbum
-
02:
FIRE AT WILL! KILL THEM ALL, GOD DAMN IT!
- 3 years ago
-
nakedbum
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
02:
LOL!
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
unimatrix0
-
02:
Let the rhetorical bombs fly!
- 3 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
02
-
02:
B-52 in Dr Strangelove
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
2helenahandbasket
-
02:
"Kill them all"?
"Let the rhetorical bombs fly"?
According to some's views if I didn't know better I might think you're a .......... CHRISTIAN.
Oh, my bad. You're a kind and tolerant leftie.
- 3 years ago
-
2helenahandbasket
-
-
02
-
02:
the left/right wars are a fakery entirely manipulated by the conservative radio talk shows.
Becoming myopic - subscribers are dupes. Fodder votes so people like Ken Lay can steal you blind while you quote dogma.
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
Livin4God
-
It is not christians who want to kill non-believers its people who have hatred. Actually the Bible says that we are not to kill one another. Becomeing a christain doesnt develope a drive to go off and murder someone. Just look at the christian news. Daily christians are being killed for thier faith, its not saying christians are killing another nonbeliever. people who portray as people of faith and kill for pleasure are actually people who are not true christians according to Gods word.
- 3 years ago
-
Livin4God
-
-
cztheday
-
Oh, and by the way, Unimatrix, that was a very interesting statement with which you began this article:
"If you believe in Jesus, chances are you believe in torture. Jesus would be proud."
Setting aside for the moment the fact that this study doesn't say that, I can't help being startled by both the viciousness and the frequency of your attacks on Christianity. As I look back on your previous posts, it is clear that you don't loathe other religions to the point of making them the object of your written criticisms. I could be way out in left field (wouldn't be the first time), but I would hazard a guess that you have either been hurt very badly by someone in the context of Christianity or that you have a lot of anger in you for whatever reason and have decided to make Christianity the focus of that anger (again for whatever reason).
Neither is any of my business, of course. If you ARE in pain, I would be saddened to hear it. But since I don't know whether that is the case, what troubles me more at this point is that an obviously very intelligent person like you, who knows perfectly well that there are both horrible, ugly, evil people who are Christians AND people who are their polar opposites AND everybody in between is nonetheless so indiscriminate in your hurtfulness.
Surely you know, for example, that it hurts me to hear an intelligent person tell me that I more than likely believe in torture and that Jesus would be ashamed of me. And I know you won't be so condescending as to say that you "didn't mean to include me" when you made this statement. You meant to address all Christians and did so.
Oh well, I am just sorry to see so much anger and hatred bottled up in one person.
- 3 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
unimatrix0
-
cztheday:
@cz
Now you take the cheap shot at me, but that's cool.
I am not angry. I am not wounded. I do this for fun.
All religions that claim a deity or some supernatural force are equally flawed.
The headline and the story is calculated to create buzz and generate conversation. On this occasion I dare say I was successful.
It is my pleasure to sit back and watch while people go off in all sorts of directions - I enjoy the discussion, that is why I make the posts. I even enjoy the attacks on myself.
Your attack is smarter than most because you attempt to marginalize me as some wounded victim of religion gone wrong. By attempting to cast me as a victim you attempt to marginalize and discredit my voice. Again, this is smarter than most, who simply hurl dumb insults or quote the bible or other such non-sense.
I do have an agenda. I will always point out that god is a delusion, and that religion is often an excuse to commit the most heinous of crimes. Further, religion has been and continues to be a means of oppression.
At this point your protests begin to sound hollow. We have had this conversation before. If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
You are like a kid who signs up to play tackle football and than starts to cry whey you get tackled. Man up. Nobody says you have to play - but if you are going to play than enjoy it.
I know I am having the time of my life. I enjoy the discussion. I do not take it personal. For me it is a wonderful, addictive game. I wish you would enjoy it more. You seem awful sad sometimes.
peace
- 3 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
cztheday
-
cztheday:
I am very sad sometimes. I see an intelligent person engaging in hurtful stereotyping who actually thinks she is doing GOOD when all she is really doing is defending bigotry. What you are doing is not in any way whatsoever different from pointing out a group of African American criminals and telling people that this is what being an African American is all about. I should be happy that you do this?
Man up? You know nothing of any importance about me. Six months ago, I was lying in a hospital dying. My wife had to come into my hospital room while I was still conscious because the doctors had told her that she should start making arrangements to transport my body back to our hometown (we were on vacation when I became ill), and despite her own emotional state, she felt that she needed to get any message to our kids that she could from me and to say good-bye. That was the fourth time I have been in that situation in the last five years, and because of a rare blood disorder whose only existing treatment is so experimental that my insurance won't cover it (at over $10,000 a month) I can't know whether I will be there again next week, next year or never. I hope (and pray) for the best, of course, but only a fool would take THOSE odds to Vegas.
I suppose it is good that you are enjoying yourself. What do indiscriminate allegations on a site like this mean anyway, right? It's just cyberspace. These people aren't real so they can't possibly experience real pain or real sorrow. But please don't get the impression that I am debating you. Debate is what I do for a living, and the poll you cite as "evidence" for your "proposition" would at best draw you a contempt of court citation if you were ever up on the porch with the Big Dogs. This is baby stuff -- a place where you can be as obnoxious, dissembling and intolerant as you want to be -- without consequences. Yeah, I can see why this would be your ideal environment.
- 3 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
unimatrix0
-
cztheday:
Cry me a river.
Too much information dude. Sorry about your health, but it is irrelevant to our discussion, and does nothing to make your case. Perhaps it would be better to debate next time, rather than simply play the sympathy card. It makes you appear weak, and I know this is not the case.
I am not responsible for your happiness, you are.
For someone who claims to play with the "Big Dogs" you sure do have a thin skin. When you get upset in your "big time court cases" do you whine about your health? Am I supposed to be impressed that you claim to be a lawyer? Please.
But your machinations are not about me - you seem to be experiencing a crisis in faith. If you are sincere in your belief why does Jesus not cure you? If you are sincere in your belief, why do you fear or worry over death? Does not your acceptance of the lord guarantee you a spot in heaven for eternity?
You act as if I made the poll up - I did not - I only brought it to your attention. The fact that you take it as a personal attack is silly, naive and melodramatic.
Grow up.
I see an intelligent man who has surrendered his powerful faculty of reason for a deception and a fraud. This makes me sad. I hope you think your way out of your confusion.
Good luck with everything.
peace
- 3 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
artemis6
-
Someone should do a documentary on that question . If would be good for "Americans " to get to know the rest of the world as well . I bet they would find they are just as human . We may have to come down to their level before all is said . It wasn't until about 3 years into the great depression that the full impact was felt . All the aid ran out .
- 3 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
masliko
-
More disnfo from unimatrix0 as usual,by the way how many of you is there?
Divide & Conquer lol
- 3 years ago
-
masliko
-
-
cztheday
-
I hope this isn't too far off the subject, but as I was reading the last couple of posts a thought popped into my head that I had considered a few times before, and I didn't want to lose it (so I am going to subject you to it -- talk about torture...)
It was just that I have considered what image most people around the world -- and especially in the so-called Third World countries have of Americans. And despite the horrors of the stories and pictures of the torture done at Guantanamo, I doubt that newspapers are the source of most of that opinion (there are serious problems of literacy and the quality of the press in such places, for one thing, and I don't even know if a local newspaper in Bangladesh, for example, would be particularly inclined to take up space in their newspaper regarding Americans doing ANYthing...).
In fact, I am not even sure most people in such areas have ever SEEN or MET an American face-to-face. But I'll bet a lot of them have seen terrifyingly loud and powerful American fighter planes and watched them drop bombs with unthinkable destructive power from several miles up in the sky. What, I wonder, does a subsistence farmer in the Middle East or South Asia or the Phillipines, or wherever -- who has always resolved his own conflicts with others face-to-face -- think of a people who fly around in the safety of their big machines, dropping bombs on people they have never met and killing them with the same nonchalance that the farmer might kill a mosquito. Then these Americans casually fly off while those who have been bombed begin to mourn their dead and rebuild their homes.
Do they think that we are fundamentally cowards, hiding behind our big machines? Cowards who see the lives of others as just so many insects to crush from afar?
- 3 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
artemis6
-
I agree with humanpasta . I think , there are good people in every religion, yet these same religions have an element of rage and fear ( an angry god , fear of hell , which is eternal torture ) that often the decent members I talk with gloss over . These theologies may market themselves as religions of peace and love , yet I who grew up in one felt generally judged and "born in sin " guilty without a crime . Messed up psychology , that is . Almost designed to create resentment and anger and fear that must surely be projected outward . I you believe in a hell , then your god approves of torture . Likely you might too .
- 3 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
For those of you saying "we should be allowed to torture if our families or citizens are at risk."
Then I ask you how are we any different than them? We will be giving them the excuse to kill us and torture our own people. We will have no sway with them or the world. What country is this that hides its freedoms. I say we are the better people if we can stand strong against evil without succumbing to what makes men destructive.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
- 3 years ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
dognose
-
Read "Stranger in a Strange Land" it pretty much sums up all monotheistic religions. And by the way. All three religions are the same fucking thing, they just change the names.
- 3 years ago
-
dognose
-
-
dognose
-
If you believe in "Heaven" and "Hell" it's easy to sanction torture and murder. You can always apologize in the "afterlife" if you're wrong. After all, you're only doing "God's work". Those of us who believe this life is all we have find it harder to justify evil deeds in the name of good or "righteousness". Unfortunately, Julius Caesar was correct. "The masses are easily swayed". By anyone who has the forum to reach a large number of people who feel that they aren't in control of their own lives. Religion is inherently for the weak and cowardly who want a father figure to guide and control them.
- 3 years ago
-
dognose
-
-
chunche
-
I think that verse to "use the rod" is resonating a bit too much in this case...
- 3 years ago
-
chunche
-
-
galwayman
-
I have said all along that Obama should go after the Bush administration Jan and continue to say it on current and everywhere else!
- 3 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
numinant
-
Regarding the generalizations regarding Christians, perhaps we can just agree than instead of saying "Christians are this" we can rather say "The prevailing Christian view is this." A bit pedantic maybe, but it would save us from having to debate semantics.
- 3 years ago
-
numinant
-
-
current89
-
numinant:
Good idea.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
cztheday
-
numinant:
So long as you know what the "prevailing Christian view is." I am a Christian and have been for most of my life, and there are few issues on which I would feel qualified to state "the prevailing Christian view."
The other significant question that comes immediately to mind is: "For what reason is "the prevailing Christian view" relevant to whatever issue you are discussing? I mean, is determining what, precisely, that view is on whatever the subject is going to add value to the discussion?
Maybe I am all alone on my own little island on the whole area of spirituality (I doubt it), but I find it to be a deeply personal matter and one that only the very shallow brushes aside with disdain. The age-old questions like," Why am I (or any of us) here?" "Am I really just a bag of meat, or is there such a thing as a "soul" or even just a "consciousness" that is more than just a biological process?" 'Is there such a thing as "meaning" in the context of our existence?' "If not, why do I not feel compelled to simply extract every experience from life that gives me pleasure, rather than compelled to take into account the feelings of others?" "Are man-made laws really the only ones that matter to me, or are there other laws that I feel compelled to follow -- and if so, do the latter come only from my own imagination?" and (literally) a thousand others have been the subject of contemplation by many/most/dare I say "ALL?" of the greatest minds in human history.
I don't mind in the slightest when someone is so absolutely certain of their own answers to such questions that they can finish the "test" and still catch a nap before class ends. But I DO mind (quite a bit, actually) when someone has the presumption to think they can answer those questions for ME.
And since I struggle so much answering them for myself, I could not begin to pretend to answer them for anyone (and certainly not for everyone) else. So I come back to the question of why the "prevailing Christian view" matters. Sadly, it seems to matter all too often only in the context of mocking Christians and Christianity. And someone who does such a thing is no better than those hateful Christians who mock others for their disbelief, their sexual orientation or their lifestyle. These are all facets of the same intolerance, and an intolerant athiest is no better than an intolerant Christian, an intolerant Muslim or an intolerant Jew.
- 3 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
numinant:
@cz I understand where you are coming from and agree that spirituality and god can be very personal things. I also think most atheists ponder these larger questions of life all the time and have not come to any full "answers" ...The reason "the prevailing christian view" is relevant when discussing a matter, for me, is more or less a political one. Religious ideas- In America, the majority considering themselves Christian- have a lot of power and influence in our society. I would like to see less of that influence because unfortunately statistics (which of course can always be flawed to some degree) seem to indicate that the majority of those who call themselves Christian agree on major issues (and I disagree with their conclusions). Evangelistic Christianity is still growing and it can be quite frightening when you see what some people practice and then consider that they are running the country.
Matters of personal gods and beliefs, to me, are fun and enlightening to discuss.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
numinant
-
If Christ was among us, he'd probably be waterboarded.
- 3 years ago
-
numinant
-
-
maxjunk
-
Well the sci-fi novel their "religion" (it goes a step further in stupidity) is based on is CONSTANTLY yapping on about rape, torture, killing, fucking animals, fucking humans, it has alot of profanity, and ALOT more torture than any other book I've ever read 1/4 of a page of.
- 3 years ago
-
maxjunk
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
maxjunk:
The Koran is mild compared to the Old Testament.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
GoliathandDavid
-
maxjunk:
"Then they brought the captives, the booty, and the spoil to Moses, to Eleazar the priest, and to the congregation of the children of Israel...But Moses was angry with the officers of the army, with the captions over thousands and captains over hundreds, who had come from the battle. And Moses said to them, "Have you kept all the women alive? Look these women caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the Lord...Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not know a man intimately." Numbers 31:12, 14-18
Agreed FallenMorgan. The slaughter of the Midianites (read the text above), bothered the hell out of me when I first read it as a child. What kind of God tells his followers "thou shalt not kill," and then orders something like this. Not to mention Onan, humanity would have been wiped out long ago if the same punishment was dealt to every teenage boy.
- 3 years ago
-
GoliathandDavid
-
-
jubal
-
maxjunk:
I had a Libertarian philosophy professor in college who argued that "Though shalt not kill" is incorrectly translated. He said it means "though shalt not murder." Killing is OK when it is done for purposes of upholding the law.
Then I asked him "whose law?" Who decides? Who is the ultimate authority?
Personally I think that trying to say that some killing is OK is a stupid argument.
- 3 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
gen468
-
well! dissing Cyndi Dupree is pointless.
all she is is doing is quoting the Bible.
Wait till someone starts quoting the Koren, that will make your hair stand on end.
And by the way Muslims still practice what they preach.Besides this is a bogus article and a bogus survey,
It was posted for the sole purpose of the
denigration of Christians .
The survey showed 71% of American agreed that our Government should do what it takes to save lifes.
Some crazy bastard blows your family up and you find out the Goverment could have prevented it .
lets see your concern for the murdering fanatic then.Oh but lets give him a fair trial while his brothers blow us the hell up.
Yeah the bait worked you hooked me.
- 3 years ago
-
gen468
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
gen468:
So we should give up our freedoms and our constitution for a few minutes? When will it stop? Who is to decide where the line is drawn?
- 3 years ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
Mikeysfake1
-
Watch Goya's Ghosts.
- 3 years ago
-
Mikeysfake1
-
-
jubal
-
Mikeysfake1:
Mikeysfake1,......excellent suggestion, everyone on this thread should see that film.
- 3 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
sickinjersey
-
Torture is a terrible thing.Read the bible that is torture.
- 3 years ago
-
sickinjersey
-
-
Get_Cape
-
sickinjersey:
Reading your comments is torture.
Ha! Sorry.
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
GoliathandDavid
-
sickinjersey:
That explains why most Christians I've met have never read it.
- 3 years ago
-
GoliathandDavid
-
-
02
-
sickinjersey:
I ran into someone who was studying the "Secret Doctrines" - which supposedly was the real meanings of the words. Translated so, the bible codes the old sciences.
- 3 years ago
-
02
-
-
sillei
-
this tells you something.
- 3 years ago
-
sillei
-
-
Get_Cape
-
sillei:
This tells me a lot of things...
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
cztheday
-
I am a Christian. The intentional infliction of physical or emotional pain is wrong. I would ask the people on this post to consider one thought. Are you opposed to bigotry, intolerance, narrow-mindedness, racism, ethnophobia and the like? If so, don't you oppose such conduct from ANYONE, regardless of the nature of their spirituality? Is it helpful to society to say that one is opposed to intolerance and then adding "from Christians" any more than it would be helpul to say that you are opposed to intolerance and then adding "from African Americans" or "from men" or "from Asians?"
Believe me, I understand the frustration people feel from fundamentalist Christian groups who spread evil in the world through their bigotry and hypocrisy. But stereotyping all Christians based on the conduct of the worst among us is wrong--just as it would be wrong to judge Americans based on the conduct of the Tea Party participants.
And by the way, these statistics are dispositive of nothing. Just because more Christians responded this way on a poll does not mean that their Christianity CAUSED their opinions on this subject. If there even IS any one cause for their responses (which is unlikely on an issue like this one), it could just as well have to do with the demographics associated with Christians (e.g., their average economic circumstances, their average age, the percentage of men versus women, etc.). Now if 90% of Christians felt this way, that would be a little more persuasive...
- 3 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
current89
-
cztheday:
I agree, correlation does not prove causation.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
cztheday:
"Just because more Christians responded this way on a poll does not mean that their Christianity CAUSED their opinions on this subject." Yes, it would be very interesting to do some other studies with other groups and maybe cross reference them and see what overlaps- maybe that would give a clearer picture of the reasoning?
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
nanac
-
All Christians are not lumped in the same pile....You will be acknowledged by your deeds!!
- 3 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
galwayman
-
Hmmm Janforgore I do see your viewpoint on this however fanatics like cindy are a great problem in our society! My gay friends would say being gay isn't depraved it is a life choice! What gives you and others like you the right to judge someone who doesn't follow your beliefs? I believe that god is kind and encompasses all his children! The bible wasn't written by god, but rather by humans, who chose to bend gods word to their own warped sense of belief! I also believe that if you respect others, like you want to be respected, then you are following what god would expect us to do and how a kind and just god would expect us to behave! To descriminate against anyone,to kill in the name of god to continue a waped sense of belief is evil,as is condeming anyone,for choosing how to live their lives! To continue to believe that ggay people are evil or depraved is as sick as the kidnapping and murder of this poor kid who had done nothing to hurt anyone! Although the right wing so called christians hate freedom of choice it is the cornerstone of any free society,and no one should be descriminated against,attacked or murdered,when all anyone with a free mind wants is to be let alone to live their lives as they choose as long as they do no harm to anyone! religion,as least fanatics,always condem anyone who refuses to convert to their belief system! isn't that what the crusades were about? Isn't that what these moslem terrorists are about?
- 3 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
JanforGore
-
galwayman:
Well, I understand your point as well... However, people like "Cindy" who I have yet to acknowledge and probably won't, do what they do on these sites for attention. And in all honesty, those in the Bush administration who ordered and carried out torture aren't even being pursued by this current administration. Where is the outrage about that then? When you ( in general) say it should be done now, the same people who claim torture is an abomination then claim we shouldn't pursue those who carried it out because it would distract us from our goals. Seems like a contradiciton to me. If you are against torture, you want to see those who ordered it and carried out face justice, no?
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
I responded with this but wanted to repeat it and get the community's opinion:
I feel like this type of conversation gets repeated a lot on Current- "Such and such is this" / "No, not all such and such is like that!"
I mean, don't most of us realize and agree that not ALL anything can be generalized? How can we use words like "Democrats" "Christians" "Atheists" "Muslims" "Americans" and avoid this inevitable debate about stereotyping? To what extent can we use labels/names/descriptions without being told we are intolerant or judgmental?
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
JanforGore
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Fitting the title of the post to the actual article content might be a start.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
current89
-
DeliaTheArtist:
@Jan
The tile of the post does not say all Christians support torture, and you know that. It says "Christians support torture more than non-believers" Which according to this poll( and Pew is a credible researcher) is correct. Of course correlation does not prove causation, but it is a factor, obviously. Maybe you should have a sit down with other Christians and try to change their perspectives on torture.
You're a Christian, and according to this poll your fellow Christians (of any denomination) are more likely to support torture than non-believers. I understand that you take this as a personal attack on your faith(which it isn't) but that does not change the fact that this poll found Christians more likely to support torture than non-believers.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
While I can see where you are coming from to an extent, the title is not exactly wrong and the content of the post is not misleading. It clearly states what the poll results were "Those most likely to approve of torture some or most of the time are white evangelical Christians. Those least likely are "unaffiliated" and those who rarely or never attend church services." Honestly, the title speaks to that pretty well.
My main point is, isn't it common sense that not "all" Christians (or Jews, or Muslims, or Atheists, or Democrats, or Republicans, ETC) fit one generalization? Do we need to put "some" in front of everything to when that is already understood?
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
current89
-
DeliaTheArtist:
@Delia
I must say that you truly do try to find some middle ground. It's quite refreshing to say the least.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Thanks, I'm really not trying to be a dick or argue this for the sake of being right. I see this happen on Current all the time and I'm sincerely wondering how we can avoid these repetitive and obvious arguments.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Get_Cape
-
DeliaTheArtist:
I think there should just be a "Religion" section.
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Well Cape, that honestly may happen sooner than you think- Current is working on some new features for the website and what you said sounds like it falls into that realm.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Get_Cape
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Cool, I think anything tagged with "Religion" shouldn't even be displayed anywhere else, regardless of the other tags it has. Didn't the old Current have a religion specific section?
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
I don't know how "old" you mean, I haven't been here since Current started, but one of the main complaints that surfaced before the latest revamp was too many religion articles, so, lol, I guess that's just the way it is!
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Get_Cape
-
DeliaTheArtist:
I meant the last version of the site. There also seems like theres been a lot of religion articles lately too. And articles that are made just to start arguments.
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Is there a difference to you between discussions and arguments? Also, i think some arguments can be productive if they are handled the right way.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Get_Cape
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Well, by arguments I mean articles that are written just to hate on religious people, atheists, gays, swine, etc...
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Well, I know Uni is an outspoken atheist but I really don't think this article was intended to discriminate against anyone, and honestly the users determine what the mood of the article is by their comments. For the record, I've heard there are "too many" religious posts on Current since I've been here, but since I like discussing religion I don't really mind it! I simply don't post on stories I'm not interested in.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Get_Cape
-
DeliaTheArtist:
I wasn't really talking about this article. There have been some bad ones though.
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Agreed. I just vote 'em down.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Get_Cape
-
Once again, anyone can say they are a Christian, but very few actually live up to that claim. None of which fight in wars, torture people, hate, or love violence in any way.
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
gen468
-
Do you think the use of torture against suspected terrorists in order to gain important information can often be justified, or sometimes be justified?
71% of the entire sample answered yes to the above.
To what extent should our government go to protect say 3000 American lives.
About 30% of Americans "based on this small sample of less then 1000," believe that if our government suspect a terrorists has information that would have prevented 9/1/01 that they should have done nothing to uncover the plot.
300o lives vs some water boarding,
Hard decision huh.! - 3 years ago
-
gen468
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
gen468:
As someone said before, many of the people who have been torchured have not been completely verified as being part of any terrorist organization.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
unimatrix0
-
gen468:
Torture is always wrong. It is not a hard decision. It is an easy decision. Torture is always wrong.
US and International Law is clear. Anyone with a moral compass knows torture is wrong. Those who would try to justify torture are no better than the terrorists they fight.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
- 3 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
We should put a loony test on the registration form.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
current89
-
FallenMorgan:
Agreed.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
nanac
-
History is full of the misdeeds of the so called Christians..How many countries have the Christians invaded? Enslaved their People, raped their women and stole their wealth......America's Conservatives are the decendants of those Christians!!!!!!!!!
- 3 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Not all Christians support torchur, just like how not all Muslims support terrorism, and not all atheists are rational (as kuffar showed us). Plus, polls aren't exactly accurate.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
current89
-
FallenMorgan:
True, but on average they have a 3-5% margin of error. Which is fairly accurate.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
2helenahandbasket
-
FallenMorgan:
One poll doesn't show much of anything, Morgan. Poll makers have a way of making polls show what they want them to.
- 3 years ago
-
2helenahandbasket
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
JanforGore, what you said is well put. But the actual PEW research put the categories as Evangelical, Protestant, non affiliated, etc... and what it shows is that more Evangelicals favor torture than those who don't. People aren't born evangelicals or protestants or atheists like they are born black, gay or white. Perhaps this poll is showing the insights of how the various christian groups are taught.
Although we definitely cannot say all Evangelicals are torturers and all non-affiliated are against it, what we can say is that it is more likely an Evangelical will be pro-torture compared to a non-affiliated. Which can lead us to believe many (not all) evangelicals are taught that torture is okay OR that they aren't being taught it is bad.
To Cindy:
You contradict yourself."we as christians believe in this ..we are not shedding the blood of an innocent man these men are killing us,our families,their families and trying to take us all down they deserve what they get"
Might I point out that most people we torture are not put to court and found guilty of anything. They are usually put to torture because of one person which leads us to something you said -
"One witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die. "And of course I found it funny when you said,
"Let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother and our flesh. "
I thought that's what we do in torture. - 3 years ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
JanforGore
-
NickerBocker09:
Exactly, and that then should be the title of the post:
"Poll Shows More Evangelical Support For Torture Than Nonbelievers." The way the poster chose to phrase the title however, connotates a fallacy. - 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Get_Cape
-
NickerBocker09:
The story was named that way on purpose, to create arguments.
- 3 years ago
-
Get_Cape
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
NickerBocker09:
"The way the poster chose to phrase the title however, connotates a fallacy."
No it doesn't. The polls indicate (from the article): "Those most likely to approve of torture some or most of the time are white evangelical Christians. Those least likely are "unaffiliated" and those who rarely or never attend church services." Christians support torture more than non-believers. That is not a fallacy according to these results. It does NOT say "All Christians think the same way and Support Torture" or anything like that.
I think you are nit-picking something that for most people is common sense. I'm willing to bet a majority of people on Current understand that not all members of any group endorse the same thing or think the same way.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
JanforGore
-
NickerBocker09:
I think I'm expressing an opinion and an observation, which FYI is allowed here. Thank you.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
current89
-
NickerBocker09:
lol Jan, of course you're allowed to, but we're also allowed to prover your opinion unreasonable.
- 3 years ago
-
current89
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
NickerBocker09:
Repetitive argument #2. Sigh.
Obviously everyone is entitled to their opinion. You are entitled to your opinion, I am entitled to my opinion about your opinion, you are entitled to your opinion about my opinion about your opinion and onward forever. No one is saying that you aren't.
I don't understand why you always have to jump to the same defenses every time, Jan. I'm sincerely curious about this issue because it happens a lot on Current and I'm trying to have a productive conversation about the use of definitions and labels vs stereotypes, not get into nonsense with you about who's entitled to what.
- 3 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
JanforGore
-
NickerBocker09:
Actually based on reason, that opinion is not unreasonable as polls in general are endemically flawed. If you are going to state a poll that only polled a segment of the population with questions that may have been phrased a certain way to get a desired response, you cannot state a title as fact that all of any group believe any certain way or don't believe it. Well, you can state it, but that doesn't make it true. No matter what the topic, you don't know what all may believe or don't believe. It is a misrepresentation.
It is just like using one poll result to claim that all Liberals who don't go to church are anti God or any number of generalizations based on labels. I actually believe polls are designed to come up with results to please those commissioning the polls just like those polls that come out during election cycles that are commissioned strictly to demonize the opposition. Of course, that doesn't change the fact that yes, on the whole religious dogma is in many instances hypocritical. But that should not reflect on all those who do espouse to principle and morality who also believe in God and not the dogma. A simple point that I don't think warrants your constant anklebiting of me here.
- 3 years ago
-
JanforGore
