Community | May 07, 2009 | 48 comments

Doctors Arrested in DC for advocating Single Payer Healthcare!!

asherp
Doctors and other advocates of a national single-payer system–also known as Improved Medicare for All–directly confronted Senators at the Senate Finance Committee roundtable on health reform today.

The single payer advocates wanted to know why single-payer experts were being excluded from the roundtable of fifteen witnesses.

The doctors said that a publicly funded, privately delivered single-payer system is the only solution to the crisis plaguing our nation’s non-system of health care. It covers everyone, and contains costs.

“Why isn’t single-payer at the table today?” they asked.

Despite polling that shows a clear majority of public and physician support for a single-payer system, Senator Baucus, Chair of the Senate Finance Committee has stated on multiple occasions that single-payer is “off the table” of health reform.

Today’s round table, the second of three, consists of 15 witnesses with no single-payer advocates.

Doctors and activists representing a coalition of single-payer advocacy organizations including Physicians for a National Health Program, Healthcare-NOW!, Single Payer Action, Private Health Insurance Must Go, the Campaign for Fresh Air and Clean Politics, Prosperity Agenda, and Health Care for the Homeless dressed in black in memory of the 22,000 people who die every year due to lack of health insurance.

They spoke out at today’s Senate Finance Committee Hearing one after another during the opening comments of the discussion.

“Health insurance administrators are practicing medicine without a medical license,” said Dr. Margaret Flowers, Co-Chair of Maryland chapter PNHP. “The result is the suffering and death of thousands of patients for the sake of private profit. The private health insurance industry has a solid grip on patients, providers and legislators. It is time to stand up and declare that health care is a human right.”

Much to the frustration of Chairman Baucus, multiple disruptions demanding single-payer be on the table set the tone for the second of three roundtables on Health Reform by the Senate Finance Committee.

“The current discussion on health reform is political theater at its best. Our elected officials are hosting these events to go through the motions of what developing effective national health policy should look like. There is a big difference between getting health policy experts in the room and the witnesses here today who would profit the most from reform. That difference means our hard earned dollars will go to further insurance industry profits, not to guarantee health care to the American people,” states Katie Robbins, Assistant National Coordinator of Healthcare-NOW!, representing thousands of citizens in support of single-payer health care.

“It’s a pretty spectacular display of raw political power,” said Russell Mokhiber of Single Payer Action. “The health insurance industry demands that not one of the fifteen people who testified today shall be a single payer advocate. And the industry gets what it wants. It’s time for the American people to storm the gates and demand – put single payer on the table.”

Single-payer is successfully implemented in the United States’ own Medicare system providing comprehensive care to the elderly, as well as in many of the best health care systems in the world. A single-payer system as embodied in legislation HR 676 and S 703 would provide guaranteed, quality care to all Americans at the same cost of our current system.

Single-payer advocates will continue to use direct actions and nonviolent civil disobedience to urge the inclus
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Health,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News Politics News and Politics Health 17 more
  3.     
    |

48 comments // Doctors Arrested in DC for advocating Single Payer Healthcare!! // Video

  • trut
  • Incredulous
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • Replace Medicaid with volunteer pro-bono medical care
      In the days before Medicare and Medicaid, the poor and elderly were admitted to hospitals at the same rate they are now, and received good care. Before those programs came into existence, every physician understood that he or she had a responsibility towards the less fortunate and free medical care was the norm. Hardly anyone is aware of this today, since it doesn’t fit into the typical, by the script story of government rescuing us from a predatory private sector.

      Private medical savings accounts, not government meddling
      The most obvious way to break this cycle is to get the government out of the business of meddling in health care, which was far more affordable and accessible before government got involved. Short of that, and more politically feasible in the immediate run, is to allow consumers and their doctors to pull themselves out of the system through medical savings accounts.

      Transfer funds from debt & empire-building to healthcare
      We have a mess because a lot of people are very dependent on health care. But we’re going broke, with $500 billion going to debt every single year, and we have a foreign policy that is draining us. I say, take care of these poor people. I’m not against that. But save the money someplace. The only place available for us to save it is to change our attitude about running a world empire and bankrupting this country. We can take care of the poor people, save money and actually cut some of our deficit.

      Socialized medicine won’t work; nor managed care
      You don’t have to throw anybody out in the street, but long term you have move toward the marketplace. You cannot expect socialized medicine of the Hillary brand to work. And you can’t expect the managed care system that we have today [to work, because it] promotes and rewards the corporations. It’s the drug companies & the HMOs & even the AMA that lobbies us for this managed care, and that’s why the prices are high. It’s only in medicine that technology has raised prices rather than lowering prices.

    • 4 years ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • Shouldn't citizens be free to purchase their own health care and use private insurance?

      Health care providers should charge what they feel is necessary. If a health care provider charges to high then people can't afford it and they won't buy it, therefore, that health care provider loses out. Health care prices would self-regulate to meet the standards of the consumer. It would be best to cease funding provincial health care programs.

      The power and politics of government makes it arrogant, inefficient, corrupt and dangerous. Because of this inherent nature of government, government programs almost always fail to do what they were supposed to. And expanding government power to do what you think it should ensures that future politicians will use it in ways you think they shouldn’t.

    • 4 years ago
  • Toughth
    • 0
      Toughth  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      If everyone could afford the programs that you talk of. as it is even those with BS/BC, Cigna, and other health insurances still have to fork over thousands out of pocket for care. The presnt system is just for the profit of those that don't even have anythiing to do with the actual care of a pateint. And those that do are busy trying to raise the price of just gettting on with life. i take it that you support the idea of pay as you go, and if you can't to bad. Just crawl off and die without bothering those that can afford life.

    • 4 years ago
  • bluestranger
    • 0
      bluestranger  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      Nothing about single payer health care would prevent anyone from going out of the system if they chose to pay for their health care. How could a properly system be any more screwed up than what the greed of the insurance companies have done so far? Life and death decisions shouldn't be left with C.E.O.s and C.F.O.s. For the best example of how to screw up capitalism or a republic look to Wall Street and Detroit.

    • 4 years ago
  • artemis6
  • Marilynn_Murray
    • 0
      Marilynn_Murray  
    • bluestranger, It's their campaign money. I hope they know that they may cheat us out of single payer, but I will work tirelessly for public campaign financing so that someone can run for their damned seats. I'm tired of the corporate whores selling us out. People die from lack of health care. Last year a child died in this country from a damned absessed tooth. I'm angry, we all should be.

    • 4 years ago
  • bluestranger
    • 0
      bluestranger  
    • As long as single payer is not on the table any health care improvement talks are a sham. Seriously, do you really think that these public servants would cut themselves off from all of that big insurance money?

    • 4 years ago
  • Toughth
    • 0
      Toughth  
    • The congress and senat don't want to hear from the people that employ them. They feel that we the people are below the level of their collective notice.

    • 4 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • no seat for a single payer advocate. hmmm... i wonder how much a seat at that committee table costs to buy. maybe us sane people can take up a collection and get us one or two.

    • 4 years ago
  • librelover
    • 0
      librelover  
    • It definitely seems like a distortion of the People's interests when there is an obvious interest in the discussion of single payor healthcare and they are not even willing to discuss the costs and benefits of it.

      I'm sorry I had to read someone associating the GOP agenda with "libertarian nonsense". Libertarians would probably suggest that open dialogue for the sake of finding the best solution is what is important. It sounds like the single payor solution isn't necessarily asking for people to pay for anymore of anyone elses insurance than they already do. One of the main reasons our healthcare is currently so high is due to the vast number of people receiving treatment for free in emergency rooms when they have no way to pay for the care.

      Liberty isn't about watching your fellow man rot. It is about having individual liberty to practice as you choose in your own pursuit of happiness. I'm sure that if the numbers can be shown to improve the costs and benefits to everyone involved, there would be few people who resist. That is probably why special interests want to see it dismissed without discussion.

    • 4 years ago
  • votedforgore
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • Yes, this is the country we have - where they scheme under that table to f---k you out of money they do not deserve.

      They are shameful people, without shame. They are criminal - but they are the heads of our society.

      One thing we ought to have is a system where every xray and every test is kept in an accessible file. Then you could show when and how they did unneeded tests and unneeded procedures. And charged unneeded "costs".

      Because they are cheats - slimy - cheats.

      That's what we got for medical people and a medical system. (except the few good ones, of course)

    • 4 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • spoon
    • 0
      spoon  
    • Many (most) people said we would never end slavery for the same reason (greed of moneyed interests) but sometimes Truth and Justice take time before they become unavoidable.

      Never say never when you're talking about something so important that is obviously so right and true. I believe "the Truth will out" and it's a question not of "if" but rather "when"?

    • 4 years ago
  • spoon
    • 0
      spoon  
    • "The Cruelest Lie" perpetrated on America is that universal health coverage done right (for a real change) would cost more than what we're spending now. Reliable estimates are that we could easily save a minimum of $400 Billion per year after everyone is covered reliably and comprehensively from cradle to grave just in wasted administrative bureaucracy alone.

      The concept is known in Basic Economics 101 as: "Eliminate unnecessary, expensive, amoral middlemen and utilize efficincies of scale". Divided we are conquered. United we have strength, transparency and choice at tremendous savings in both lives and dolllars....and our moral standing on the world stage. NO business that expects to remain viable would allow an unnnecessary middleman to skim 31% off the top before any goods or services could begin to be delivered, and "We the People's" business should not continue to allow it either.

      BTW, Obama just wants to funnel more of our tax dollars in corporate welfare to "The Beast That IS the Problem"....and that won't solve the problem. Obama knows what needs to happen but refuses to help make it happen, and McCain/Palin didn't (still don't) even have a clue.

    • 4 years ago
  • Elevator
  • quantumburner84
    • 0
      quantumburner84  
    • they dont want to go cold turkey from their highly dependant addiction to MONEY -
      the U.S healthcare as is - is little more than highly profitable extortion of the populas that has no choice but pay up or die ..
      and most people will sell everything they own to live..
      therefore a very lucrative business system

      offering a way for everyone to be treated fairly on all grounds would kill their wallets and their nice shiney bmw's and mustangs for themselves and those nice n fancy coats and cruiseline vacations yearly..

    • 4 years ago
  • betruelarue
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • while I support exploration of single payer as an option and applaud the guy for doing this, I have to say the title of this is deliberately misleading. The original title for the video, which you get by clicking on the video rather than the posted link.

      "Protester Delays Senate Committee Opening" That's what he got arrested for. There is no pseudo conspiracy.

      Personally I think the reason single payer is getting short shrift at the moment is that no matter how much good it would do in the long term, the economy simply cannot afford another entire major industry being picked up and shaken like a rat at the moment.

    • 4 years ago
  • spoon
    • 0
      spoon  
    • bombastinator:

      That's only if we remain blind to the damage this rat is doing to our people, our country, and our economy as a whole. This particular business hurts every other business except itself, and kills many people and businesses while riding its unbelievably large gravy train at our expense. This rat needs some serious shaking, and the sooner we quit fiddling with it and feeding it even more of our dollars (that it uses against us), the sooner we can start saving innocent lives and wasted health care dollars.

      It makes money by price gouging healthy people and denying often desperately needed medical care to sick ones. How is that a workable model for US?

    • 4 years ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • bombastinator:

      It's not workable in the long run but at least it's not in actual active failure right now.
      It's a gigantic section of the economy that would have to completely rearrange itself. We're currently doing that with the auto industry and the banking system. I can see why a legislator would might want to table it till there's a bit more stability.Deliberately upsetting one more trillion dollar to-big-to-fail business at this point qualifies as borrowing trouble.

    • 4 years ago
  • spoon
    • 0
      spoon  
    • bombastinator:

      I respectfully disagree. Allowing this beast to continue damaging our economy and running amok over innocent Americans is asking for trouble. We simply cannot afford to allow it to continue. It's gone on too long already.

    • 4 years ago
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • bombastinator:

      The Health Insurance industry is one of THE major overhead costs of running a business of any size.

      If we got rid of health insurance, nearly half of the overhead that our automotive companies pay would be eliminated.

      If reducing the costs of operating business doesn't spur the economy, I don't know what would.

    • 4 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • I am deeply frustrated by the decision to take single payer off the table as well. This train left the station and is 100 miles down the track. Frankly, I am concerned that there is going to be a gap effect. You will only get good health care if you are rich or get good insurance from your employer on one side or are so poor that the Government will simply provide you with insurance on the other side. Left out will be the millions and millions of Americans who may not be poverty stricken but will be forced to give up an enormous percentage of their limited incomes to purchase the "public option" insurance. My state already has that program in place, and I am paying $1500 per month for my family's health insurance -- with no dental or vision coverage and a $2,000 deductible EACH! I am afraid that is exactly the kind of program Baucus has in mind -- which of course is of no competitive concern to existing insurance companies. Among the real shames of all of this is the fact that once something is done, this subject is not going to be revisited for at least another 20 years. That is just how Congress has always "worked."

    • 4 years ago
  • neocongo
  • wally60
    • 0
      wally60  
    • in america the man with the most money gets
      his way.there will come a time we will have to throw out
      all the politicians.we have to change this we pay the most for healthcare and the us is ranked 37 in the
      world .

    • 4 years ago
  • GoliathandDavid
    • 0
      GoliathandDavid  
    • "...Everybody in the Congress deeply deeply respect the views of all members of the audience and all Americans who feel deeply about health care reform..."

      That's why we're arresting you.

    • 4 years ago
  • stopnoise
    • 0
      stopnoise  
    • You should be mad as hell! This is not about a point of view bs. This is about human lives that are being killed because they have no health care coverage.

    • 4 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
    • 0
      Marilynn_Murray  
    • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~HEALTH JUSTICE
      New Tools and Continuing Campaigns

      Stuff You Can Do. Free. Easy. Free and Easy.
      NOW

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      NewTool for Phone Calling Campaign.

      Until this morning, we had to transcribe the 200-300 voicemails we get each day from callers to our 800-578-4171 number. After transcription, we faxed the messages to the White House and each member of the Senate Finance Committee. Today, for instance, I sent a 36 page fax of closely printed voicemails from May 6.

      But starting at 0900 EST today, we went live with a system that converts each overnight voice message to a phone call, dialing the White House and Sen. Baucus automatically, waiting for a human to answer, then playing the message and hanging up. And then dialing again to deliver the next message in the queue. And the next. And so on. So this morning we delivered 500 phone messages to the White House and Sen. Baucus at the rate of one or two a minute.

      You can join the fun. Call 1-800-578-4171 and press 0 for the White House or 1 for Sen. Baucus. Or call during the day and be transferred directly to the live White House operator. Or call tonite and tomorrow and tomorrow nite and . . .
      newsletter@health-justice.org.

    • 4 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • asherp
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • Despite the dismal performance of government-run medical services throughout the world, there is considerable lobbying in the U.S. for a government-run national health care system. Politicians offer the utopian promise of universal "free" health care with unlimited access, but don't explain how the enormous costs would be covered.
      I believe we need to eliminate stifling bureaucracy, increase control over our own health care, and create new and innovative health-care choices. I am in favor of the following steps to improve the access to health-care: 1) Privatize health care, 2) Replace law of damages with law of contract in most instances, 3) Deregulate medical research & marketing, 4) End medical monopolies, 5) Teach healthy lifestyles and prevention, and 6) Encourage and expand charitable care for the poor.

    • 4 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      1) done to a large extent, 2) fine, 3) why?

      4) how? regulate?

      5) how? regulate?

      6) nice...to a certain extent useful, inevitably fails as it has been failing for the past 50 years. charities can't keep up with demand.

      "How Hungry is America"

      fantastic book, suggested reading.

    • 4 years ago
  • cybexg
    • 0
      cybexg  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      1) Largely done and we now have the infant death rates equal to some 3rd world countries.

      2) You don't have a clue about what you are talking (writing) about - both laws currently apply (and I have actually recovered for a client for health care mistakes under law of contract). In fact, there is a famous case part of every 1st year contracts course dealing just w/ this.

      sorry, couldn't continue...you are so wrong on #2 that I just stopped reading

    • 4 years ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      sounds like you want a dog eat dog world, survival of the fittest, if you can't provide for yourself, if you are weak of disabled, you are screwed.

      As a society we must provide health care for all if we are to retain our humanity.

    • 4 years ago
  • TheEmpireGuy
  • TheEmpireGuy
    • 0
      TheEmpireGuy  
    • TheEmpireGuy:

      Replace Medicaid with volunteer pro-bono medical care
      In the days before Medicare and Medicaid, the poor and elderly were admitted to hospitals at the same rate they are now, and received good care. Before those programs came into existence, every physician understood that he or she had a responsibility towards the less fortunate and free medical care was the norm. Hardly anyone is aware of this today, since it doesn’t fit into the typical, by the script story of government rescuing us from a predatory private sector.

      Private medical savings accounts, not government meddling
      The most obvious way to break this cycle is to get the government out of the business of meddling in health care, which was far more affordable and accessible before government got involved. Short of that, and more politically feasible in the immediate run, is to allow consumers and their doctors to pull themselves out of the system through medical savings accounts.

      Transfer funds from debt & empire-building to healthcare
      We have a mess because a lot of people are very dependent on health care. But we’re going broke, with $500 billion going to debt every single year, and we have a foreign policy that is draining us. I say, take care of these poor people. I’m not against that. But save the money someplace. The only place available for us to save it is to change our attitude about running a world empire and bankrupting this country. We can take care of the poor people, save money and actually cut some of our deficit.

      Socialized medicine won’t work; nor managed care
      You don’t have to throw anybody out in the street, but long term you have move toward the marketplace. You cannot expect socialized medicine of the Hillary brand to work. And you can’t expect the managed care system that we have today [to work, because it] promotes and rewards the corporations. It’s the drug companies & the HMOs & even the AMA that lobbies us for this managed care, and that’s why the prices are high. It’s only in medicine that technology has raised prices rather than lowering prices.

    • 4 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
    • 0
      Marilynn_Murray  
    • FAX & CALL 'TIL THEY DROP
      Another Fax Blast to
      Shut Down the Hill Fax Machines

      http://www.1payer.net/campaigns/finance-committee.html
      It's time to start another fax campaign demanding that the Senate Finance Committee and Mad Max Bought-off, er I mean Baucus, give single payer advocates a seat at the table in the next round of hearings. It will be a hoot to see how far away the insurance flunkies scoot their chairs when people speaking for real Americans are in the same room.

      They had a great laugh at the expense of our arrested colleagues yesterday. Maybe we can have the last laugh. Let's bombard the Senate Finance Committee and its members with faxes. Let's shut down the fax machines on Capitol Hill again.

      You can send a free fax to members of the Senate Finance Committee (chose one or choose all) at our website. It's free. It's easy. it's free and easy. Do it once. Do it twice. Do it until they drop.

      The faxes are free to you but not to me. Send your fax now, please take a moment to donate if you can.
      Health Justice | 57 W. 200 South, Suite 101 | Salt Lake City | UT | 84101

    • 4 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
    • 0
      Marilynn_Murray  
    • We have to fight for this or we will get a lousy plan that just pours money to the insurance and drug industries and we won't be able to afford it.

      HR 676 would institute a single payer health care system by expanding a
      greatly improved Medicare system to everyone residing in the U. S.

      HR 676 would cover every person for all necessary medical care including
      prescription drugs, hospital, surgical, outpatient services, primary and
      preventive care, emergency services, dental, mental health, home health,
      physical therapy, rehabilitation (including for substance abuse), vision
      care, hearing services including hearing aids, chiropractic, durable
      medical equipment, palliative care, and long term care.

      HR 676 ends deductibles and co-payments. HR 676 would save hundreds of
      billions annually by eliminating the high overhead and profits of the
      private health insurance industry and HMOs.

      In the current Congress, HR 676 has 75 co-sponsors in addition to Conyers.
      Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced SB 703, a single payer bill
      in the Senate.

      HR 676 has been endorsed by 514 union organizations in 49 states including
      127 Central Labor Councils and Area Labor Federations and 39 state
      AFL-CIO's (KY, PA, CT, OH, DE, ND, WA, SC, WY, VT, FL, WI, WV, SD, NC, MO,
      MN, ME, AR, MD-DC, TX, IA, AZ, TN, OR, GA, OK, KS, CO, IN, AL, CA, AK, MI,
      MT, NE, NY, NV & MA).

    • 4 years ago
  • boywhocould
    • 0
      boywhocould  
    • Same story as with pot litigation.. if you enable it i.e universal health care, then people will actually use it and that just cant happen :) besides its the fear of loosing health services that keeps a good deal of people working jobs they hate.

    • 4 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • "It’s time for the American people to storm the gates and demand – put single payer on the table.”

      HELL YEA! now if only we could get everyone behind this issue. stop being distracted by tax arguments and fucking libertarian nonsense. let's get this done!

    • 4 years ago
  • iemitremmusi
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • juicie
    • 0
      juicie  
    • What a sham, they are in on it. It's all about money and power, and they are a bunch of Blagos.

      I have close friends from Canada who were happier with the health care provided by their native country, than the insurance provided by their employers here in the US. Not only that, but less was taken out of their paycheck in taxes than what is taken out for so called medical benefits.

      We need to vote these crooks out; they're a bunch of politricksters, and downpressers.

    • 4 years ago
  • donkeyfly69
more from Community:

top videos