Senate Democrats won't fund closing of Guantanamo
source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090519/ap_on_go_co/us_congress_guantanamo
-
-
- asherp
- added this
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090519/ap_on_go_co/us_congress_guantanamo
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's allies in the Senate will not provide funds to close the Guantanamo Bay prison next January, a top Democratic official said Tuesday.With debate looming on Obama's spending request to cover military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the official says Democrats will deny the Pentagon and Justice Department $80 million to relocate Guantanamo's 240 detainees.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the proposed changes to the bill were to be unveiled later.
The administration has yet to develop a plan for what to do with the detainees, and Obama's promise to close the facility is facing strong GOP opposition.
It appears to be a tactical retreat. Once the administration develops a plan to close the facility, congressional Democrats are likely to revisit the topic, provided they are satisfied there are adequate safeguards.
The developments on Capitol Hill came as the Pentagon said it still expects the prison at Guantanamo Bay to be closed by January 2010 as Obama has ordered.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Politics, US Politics, 2 more
-
- tags:
- News, Politics, News and Politics, Obama, 16 more
-
-
wayseeker
-
It has explained over and over again that there are maximum prisons capable of holding them in the US. This discussion is typical politician bull and as usual it's fed by ignorance.
- 3 years ago
-
wayseeker
-
-
Davidandgoliath [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Davidandgoliath [removed]
-
-
asherp
-
Davidandgoliath:
Uh, no, it's just the news.
It's even got the same headline as the AP story.
- 3 years ago
-
asherp
-
-
JohnA [removed]
-
Fiscal restraint in the face of political expediency. Love it!
- 3 years ago
-
JohnA [removed]
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Nephwrack,
The hypocrisy I was referring to was that of our Democratic representatives, who won't dish out more of our money for something they've opposed all through this, yet they dish out billions for the "stimulus."
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
Nephwrack
-
FallenMorgan:
maybe it's because they think that the bill's writer is full of shit.
- 3 years ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
AreOh
-
Hm, this is an interesting development. Am I surprised? Not really. Still, I am more inclined to see what comes of this than making this a mere bullet point of ammo against, B.Ob. I can understand people's frustrations and negativity towards the presidency, especially after the last 8. The CiC has a lot going for him. One of those things, however, is not patience from the body politic it seems. And they are all watching...
- 3 years ago
-
AreOh
-
-
McCainiac
-
Hell, I'll take them for 75 million. I need 15 up front to build a facility and the balance on delivery. Since I'm a chef, I'll do the cooking. I guess there won't be a rib night but we can substitute with a goat barbeque night.
- 3 years ago
-
McCainiac
-
-
cmdinc
-
I believe this is follow the leader. Obama has realized he made a huge mistake, he then told the dems to make it hard for him so he saves face by "compromising"
- 3 years ago
-
cmdinc
-
-
soulistic
-
empty promises
- 3 years ago
-
soulistic
-
-
mik661
-
if we could survive the Marielitos I'm sure we can imprison some "terrorists" without it being the end of the world. The so called greatest country in the world cant neutralize a few hundred convicts? I say put them in general population in sing sing or soledad and see how long they last.
- 3 years ago
-
mik661
-
-
S3th
-
As long as we allow our politicians to keep these supposed TERRORISTS detained and tortured, BUSH/CHENEY/CIA/ and the rest of the globalist scum who planned and executed the events on 911 will continue to get away with it.
Until Americans stop avoiding looking closely at the SCIENCE of 911, and continue waving their flags, while over a million dead in Iraq and Afghanistan, moves towards 2 million, we are truly screwed.
We have no moral high ground, while the evil fuckers who are destroying our personal liberties, putting our young men and women in harms way to help acquire other nations natural resources, and fattening their personal pocketbooks!
Is everyone too fucking stupid to see this? Or too afraid to take of the red, white, and blue colored shades the propaganda team in DC put together to keep patriotic ignorance in check?
I'm ashamed of my fellow American citizens for refusing to allow themselves to be programmed into right/left seperatist propaganda from the media, and not gathering together to force our politicians to stop lying to us, and get to the truth about 911 and why we are still allowing very evil motherfuckers to use our children to kill, and illegally occupy other nations!!
- 3 years ago
-
S3th
-
-
igordy [removed]
-
These people are not being interrogated any more - there's nothing they know that we don't at this point. It's all politics from here on. Send'em back to the shithole they came from - and if they pick up the weapons again - then kill them this time, instead of taking them prisoner!
- 3 years ago
-
igordy [removed]
-
-
Kylsport
-
In all honesty, I doesn't appear that they want to discontinue the tactics used at Gitmo, yet by closing it down, they want us to believe that the tactics are no longer used. The only problem is, they are shipping people to other countries that do not observe the Geneva accords.
- 3 years ago
-
Kylsport
-
-
Broey88
-
I thoroughly enjoy how much praise Obama is getting for trying to close down Gitmo, when in reality he's just MOVING it. That's our resolution? He might as well just leave it and the detainees there if all he plans on doing is putting them in a different cell, in a different prison, on a different island. Moving Gitmo does not resolve the issue of torture, it just means it's going to be done somewhere else.
- 3 years ago
-
Broey88
-
-
echoz
-
Broey88:
=) smoke and mirrors
- 3 years ago
-
echoz
-
-
igordy [removed]
-
Newphrack - do a few of your facepalms, 'cause you're going to need them. First of all - I am quite surprised and pleased to find out that there are apparently some reasonable Dems in Congress - not everyone is an extreme leftie commie motherfucker - and with the Pelosi soon to depart - the house will hopefully get even more even - centrist. Not wanting these people on our soil - I don't see anything wrong with this. Whether they are terrorists or just the enemy combattants - I don't want them in US jails, creating more Islamic converts or even worse - walking the streets here - even in San Francisco - the kingdom of the left.
Why don't you all read some recent history about who these people are! They rebelled while being held captive in Afghanistan, caused a prison riot where the guards - both local and American were overpowered and slaughtered - and held under a seige until giving up again. There are no innocents there. These folks are Taliban and Al Queda - we have enough of their ilk already walking our streets - don't need anymore there.
Obama is pandering to the lefies by being a consumate politician that he is. The promis to close Gitmo by January - boy, doesn't that sound heroic? Regardless of consequences, costs, etc - close it, as the messiah promissed. What a crock of shit. Their countries of origin don't want them. They have a comfortable, albeit locked up living where meals are guaranteed, and so is the freedom to pray to allah. As to the repeated allegations of ass-rape - this only holds if they do each other - the guards have been purged of the "bad seed" - and even the sicko ones never did that to the prisoners. Now if one decides to do another - well, that is their own problem - as they say in the Navy - don't ask - don't tell. Hahaha
Finally, I say send them back to the Afghan prisons! If your Obama wants to "keep his promisses" (of which he already broke a dozen of) - send them back to the shithole where they came from. I bet they will BEG to go back to Gitmo!!!Finally - someone up in this blog said something about other countries loving/hating America, comparing us to a rabid dog or something. To this, I say Fuck them all. Why do you lefties want to be loved so much? Why do you want to conform to others and not be unique ourselves. Let both our enemies and our friends fear us - we are no puppy dog to be liked. We feed the whole fucking world - and it bites the hand that feeds it. I say we have a right to get out our stick and give'em a good whack once in a while - when they deserve it. As for them liking us - that will never happen - because they envy us. They will like us when god forbid we're hit again, like we were on 9-11 or worse. Do you want that? I sure don't.
- 3 years ago
-
igordy [removed]
-
-
Nephwrack
-
igordy:
Igordy, your profile pic is exceptionally fitting. having trouble spelling are we? so what was that earlier about the ACLU funding that church out of topeka kansas? oh it was FICTION. you obviously seem like an excellent millitary strategist, on par with janforgore. you talk tough, but i'll bet that the idea of peace scares you. i thought that you might have some kind of rebuttal against my challenge on the torture pics article, but i guess i grossly overestimated you.
i ask you this. have you ever talked with someone who was a veteran of ww2 or vietnam? or perhaps any veteran?
i ask you, to go to ANY veteran, any veteran of any war, and ask them if they think torture is the american thing to do. i repeat, ANY american veteran. nationalism is the same platform that hitler used, and it's (thank God) a dying idea here in the US.
oh and we WONT be hit again, as our current president was not bailed ourt by the saudibinladin group, and he knows enough to read intellegence breifings.
like i said i can do this all day long. you still havent pulled your foot out of your mouth about the comments on the ACLU.
but i wont hold my breath.
- 3 years ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
eriatarka23
-
when i first checked this out i thought "...why are the democrats making such a republican move?", and i briefly lost all my hope for the U.S. but then I noticed the price put on moving 240 people (most of which are probably about as dangerous as a plastic bottle cap) is just a little way too rediculous.
Why is this so expensive? Jesus.
Honestly I wish they would just truthfully pick out the people who are dangerous and release the innocent fellas. But then again the number of people left would be so damn small that there'd be no point in having a multi-million dollar prison!
Quite a crisis, quite a crisis.
This problem probably wouldn't even exist if only the army didn't pick out any guy with a turban or who's first name was Muhammed.Also, unclecharlie... Dude.. "done got smarts"... are you really trying to sound THAT stereotypical? Have some self-respect for the love of god and see to it that you re-read your grammar and spelling to maybe sound like a person anyone would actually want to debate with. And also, it's Guantanamo and not Gitmo. What is it with some right wing folk (i say some because i know republicans who actually know what the hell they are talking about) trying to shorten words? Jesus man, jesus. lol
- 4 years ago
-
eriatarka23
-
-
mark1957
-
On the face of things, MAYBE, the Democrats have finally figured out, it's not good policy to sign a check for something without seeing the contract. It sure would be great if my customers would do what the Congress did earlier this year. Only problem is most people are smarter than Congress. Go figure.
- 4 years ago
-
mark1957
-
-
crob80227
-
How is a 40 year old Iraqi who doesn't speak English really anymore "dangerous" than a 40 year old illegal immigrant that doesn't speak English?
"These guys are monsters! They are like Batman only a hundred times more expert in martial arts and a trillion times more brilliant!" -- so sayteh those living in terror of the GitMo detainees.
Um, not exactly. They are just ordinary human beings with no super powers.
Do we really need to keep this guy (or any of these detainees) in some kind of comic-book like high tech prison?
It's just a fucking dude!
That's it. That's all any of them are. Pissed off dirt poor foreigners, not Harvard trained super villians with Phd's in building evil robots powered by Kryptonite.
Even the worst of them, the most horrible of them...are just regular guys with no supherhuman strength and, in most cases, don't even speak English.
And yet we have millions of people cowering in terror utterly terrified that these "super villians" might set foot on US soil.
'We can't keep them here! We'll all die if they..."
Will we? Really?
Guys, if we can handle thousands of Mexican illegal immigrants I think we can handle a few hundred Iraqi detainees without freaking out, can't we?
Christ. Give me $300 bucks a month and I'll keep one of them locked in the spare bedroom. These guys aren't comic book super villians on par with something you'd find in a Superman comic.
Pretty sure that the country that put a man on the moon can figure out how to keep a few hundred foreigners locked up safely, can't we? We seem to be doing a pretty good job with the guys we have in SuperMAX facilities now.
- 4 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
mark1957
-
crob80227:
I think most of us would take you up on that offer. Provided that if, while in your custody he commits some hideous crime, you too would be accountable. Life in jail or death row. If he does nothing, all the better! It's a win-win!
- 4 years ago
-
mark1957
-
-
Nephwrack
-
terrorist loving hippies... lol, that's rich. do any of you right wingers ever deign (that means choose) to read the articles before shooting off at the keyboard? anything with the word "obama" in it must mean that he personally signed off on it right?
(facepalm)
no wonder the rest of the world hates us, it's easy to hate a rabid moron.
i'm thinking that 80 million is an awful lot of money to move 240 ppl. maybe THAT's why it wasnt approved, and you right wing scum are just spinning this to try and make the democrats look bad.
- 4 years ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
unclecharlie
-
HAHAHAHA!! The democrats have done got smarts, after all these years! Amazing! When they close the prison, do YOU want these guys in your backyard, on American soil? Hell no! What other country is going to take them? If they ship 'em to the US, are we going to build more prisons to hold them? Yessir! Spend the money to close the Gitmo jail, and then spend money to build more prsons, or expand the ones we have now! No wonder Obama is backpedaling! He only said we'd close it to pacify the terrorist loving hippies- the ones that elected him!
- 4 years ago
-
unclecharlie
-
-
crob80227
-
unclecharlie:
Are you really that worried about a 40 year old Iraqi that doesn't speak English and has little to no education whatsoever? Realistically, there is no quantifiable difference between the Iraqis detainees were ass-raping at GitMo and just an ordinary illegal immigrant. Though to be fair the illegal immigrants could blend in way, way, waaaay easier in the US (if they escaped) than an Iraqi. I'm pretty sure we can lock these guys up in a normal jail while they await their military tribrunal and we'll be perfectly safe. If it turns out later that some of them had superhuman strength, I'll apologize. Until I think we can assume that the malnurshied Iraqi detainee that can't speak English is not much more dangerous that anyone else we have in custody.
- 4 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
crob80227
-
2helenahandbasket, "They are, after all, terrorists."
BZZZZZ!
Wrong. Just like not everyone sitting in jail in the US is not actually GUILTY until proven so by a court of law, so to are the foreign nationals that we have housed at GitMo likewise. This is why we have trials in the US. because not everyone that ends up in jail is actually guilty. (though to be fair there has never been a single incident in US history of any police officer anywhere ever failing to adhere 100 percent to the letter of the law.)
In fact, it was Bush himself (no bleeding heart liberal) that personally authorized the release of DOZENS of GitMo inmates who had spent YEARS sitting in captivity.
Why did Bush let them go after ass-raping them for 7 long years?
Oops. Turns out they were innocent after all. Turns out that these high-level super hardcore terrorists....were NOT terrorists after all. They were just turned over to US soliders for bounty.
Which is understandably surprising.
When we said we'd hand over $10,000 in cash to anyone who gave us a name of a terrorists (no questions asked) who could have foreseen that some starving Iraqis would abuse the priviledge and turn in people that weren't terrorists just to get tons and tons of cash??? The system sure sounds foolproof on paper. Who could have foreseen?
I mean, normally when we handed out huge bricks of US cash in Iraq everyone always acted honorably. I mean its not like there has been ANY waste, fraud or abuse in Iraq when it come to things like reconstruction or troop support or......oh. Wait. Dammit.
But aside from all that, yeah, we should be able to house 240 Iraqis in the US without it costing $80 million dollars.
But then again if its Haliburton or KRB handling the job we should be grateful its only $80 million. Hell, those muthafuckers charge $80 million just to drive one transport truck 2 miles.
- 4 years ago
-
crob80227
-
-
echoz
-
The closing is just an empty gesture anyway if the attitude and presence of Uncle Sam remains the same in the world. But how absolutely assinine is it to close it and NOT have a plan already in place to move them...sounds like a legitimate attempt to fail 'the people' if you ask me. Sounds like more goverment at its best today.
- 4 years ago
-
echoz
-
-
krush_productions
-
Dude, pony up the dough! $80 million isn't shit anymore, just ask China.
- 4 years ago
-
krush_productions
-
-
2helenahandbasket
-
80 million dollars to relocate them to other prisons? It's all touchy feely to want to take care of these men, but nobody wants them because they're afraid of them. They are, after all, terrorists. And since nobody wants them and they will just be in prison anyway, why not leave them right where they are and save that 80 million? (No, I didn't say torture or mistreat them. The facilities at Gitmo are nice, compared with the facilities at other places.)
- 4 years ago
-
2helenahandbasket
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Such hypocrisy...
- 4 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
Nephwrack
-
FallenMorgan:
as compared to? you should really do your research before replying. dosent 80 million to move 240 ppl seem like excessive spending to your libertarian ideals?
i think that this is more of the same from the republican teabagged (ers)
" we have nothing else so lets twist words and make them look bad! ROBBLE ROBBLE ROBBLE! USA USA USA!"
- 3 years ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
asherp
-
FallenMorgan:
As compared to themselves.
They said they were against Guantanomo, they blamed the Republicans.
Then the vote for it to be used, they vote for funding it, and they vote against closing it.
- 3 years ago
-
asherp
-
-
uberdeft
-
Everyone has to make themselves relevant .. Gets very expensive when it comes to politics. Be prepared too, next 'one' is going to be a dictatorialship.
- 4 years ago
-
uberdeft
-
-
tommytripper
-
wow... my slim hope that Obama could do anything useful has just taking another bashing...
his own party will not even follow his lead...
then again you can not expect much from Washington... they have been working against the rule of law and the interest of the average person for years now, they are just getting more and more blatant about it.
- 4 years ago
-
tommytripper
-
-
leahl
-
Wow. Can't we manage to find a way to move 240 people for less that 80 million? I swear, if a non-profit was involved with creating this budget things might be different (heh).
- 4 years ago
-
leahl
-
-
justwannafindmytrue
-
leahl:
That's exactly what i was thinking
- 4 years ago
-
justwannafindmytrue
-
-
Abraham99
-
leahl:
I agree completely with Leah. What kind of crap is this? Even if we put each prisoner on an airplane flight with a first class deluxe seat, and a Federal agent sitting with him and fly him to the country he came from, it would never, ever cost 80 million bucks. So, if we assume that they came from 15 different countries and we send only 15 planes with regular fares with the agents included, it would be very cheap. I can't stand the way they suddenly come up with this 80 million dollar figure.
This is so frustrating, Democrat or Republican. SHame on them. WHat absolute BS!!! - 3 years ago
-
Abraham99
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
leahl:
Have any of you ever seen the feds do anything even closely resembeling fiscal responsability?
I can't believe any of you are surprised.
- 3 years ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
current89
-
Quite upset about this; I understand that most European countries are withdrawing their offers to accept inmates and that many do not want the inmates in federal prisons. Of course these road-blocks create a problem, where should the inmates be relocated to. So it's understandable that the Democrats want a more solid plan. But with that said, I think it's politically foolish to block/slow down Obama's plan to close the prison.
On another note good catch Asherp!. Featured in US Politics.
- 4 years ago
-
current89
