Community | June 10, 2009 | 14 comments

Rush explains what Obama and God have in common

source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecMAJUoY9cg&feature=player_embedded

WakeUpPeople
It's not enough to disinform. The important thing is to continue the lies until they believe you. A quick search on snopes.com will give you all of the facts you need, but don't count on Rush to admit that he's been wrong all of this time.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   US News
  2. tags:
    News,  News and Politics,  Politics,  Barack Obama,  4 more
  3.     
    |

14 comments // Rush explains what Obama and God have in common // Video

  • professorjwn
    • 0
      professorjwn  

    • Well, that was a year ago, now 20% of Americans believe it (documented Americans that is). If Imam Hussein Obama's views on the Ground Zero Mosque don't "clue you in", then this country is on a steeper downward slope than I feared possible.

      Even "Dingy Harry" Reid disagreed with the "messiah's" views.

      Obama could not be more out of touch with the American people if he was on the moon!
      Come to think of it, maybe that is where he was born!

      In January, I hope (I really do hope) that there is an investigation, and resolution to this issue.

      If Monica Lewinski's dress and Bill Clinton were "a scandal", what will a "non citizen" becoming President do?

      In the falsehood department, Clinton was a Piker compared to Barry Soetero or O'bama, or whatever his REAL name is. Apparently one of his social security numbers is from Connecticut, others from different locations from where he didn't live.

      We know less about Obama than we do about Osama Bin Laden. We HAVE Osama's College transcripts and KNOW where he was born.

      Kind of makes me wonder.....

    • 1 year ago
  • Robroy1
  • chasingame
    • 0
      chasingame  

    • Poor Rush....he thought he was being funny but even the guy in his own studio was making gestures like he was "shooting himself in the head". What a loser.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
  • Nader123
  • wayseeker
  • numinant
    • 0
      numinant  
    • wayseeker:

      So wrong. I seem to recall something about Limbaugh identifying his program as parody or satire or something in order to protect himself for liability on other fronts...

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • wayseeker:

      That's just why it kinda does. It hard to win a slander fight with an entertainer because they are considered exempt due to the fact the audience is expected to know they were just being entertaining and not serious. For instance that's why David Letterman got by with calling Sarah Palin a slut the other night.

    • 2 years ago
  • numinant
    • 0
      numinant  

    • Couldn't Obama sue for slander?

      Just because someone is a public official doesn't mean you're legally protected in propagating lies that damage their reputation, does it?

    • 2 years ago
  • current89
  • wayseeker
  • wayseeker
  • numinant
more from Community:
from the community

top videos