SeaJade
Chem Trails or contrails: What are they?

It wasn't so long ago that our city, amongst many others, was sprayed numerous times with malathion - quick cover our cars because the stuff will ruin the paint job on those oh so precious metal objects, but it won't hurt us humans one little iota.... (yes, a bit of sarcasm in that phrase)..... There was huge public outcry... and then....

Also at google in one segment:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8604844090880701786

CHEMA-KILL: THE MOVIE - 1:42:25 - Mar 28, 2009

"This movie documents evidence showing beyond the shadow of a doubt or any refutation of the facts that 'Chemtrails', eg. government 'geo-engineering aerosol operations' are fully in effect over all of the United States, the U.K., and many other parts of the world! Also covered are the historical pieces of the puzzle revealing a long standing policy of experimentation on the American and U.K. public by Western governments, and the new 'Morgellons' epidemic of non-organic parasites which infest the human body, and may well be the latest scientific experiment!"
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Green,   Earth and Science,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News Politics Green Earth and Science 8 more
  3. recommended by:
    ras_menelik
  4.     
    |

14 comments // Chema-Kill: the Movie // Video

  • PlatoTacius
    • 0
      PlatoTacius  
    • The question is, how do they keep getting away with it..? And why have our so called 'pillars of society' spiralled downward into this illogical and unreasonable abyss of ignorance and unconcern for the welfare of 'we the people' and, instead, used many of us for their guinea pigs, so they can have some military statistics to base their irrationality upon...

      The bottom line is...this sh*t is sick...

    • 2 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • U.k. government has admitted to spraying British public with deadly toxins in the past. Related to Guardian Story above...

    • 2 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • "The local health authority has denied there is a cluster, but Orman believes otherwise. He said: 'I am convinced something terrible has happened. The village was a close-knit community and to have so many birth defects over such a short space of time has to be more than coincidence.'

      Successive governments have tried to keep details of the germ warfare tests secret. While reports of a number of the trials have emerged over the years through the Public Records Office, this latest MoD document - which was released to Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker - gives the fullest official version of the biological warfare trials yet.

      Baker said: 'I welcome the fact that the Government has finally released this information, but question why it has taken so long. It is unacceptable that the public were treated as guinea pigs without their knowledge, and I want to be sure that the Ministry of Defence's claims that these chemicals and bacteria used were safe is true.'

      The MoD report traces the history of the UK's research into germ warfare since the Second World War when Porton Down produced five million cattle cakes filled with deadly anthrax spores which would have been dropped in Germany to kill their livestock. It also gives details of the infamous anthrax experiments on Gruinard on the Scottish coast which left the island so contaminated it could not be inhabited until the late 1980s.

      The report also confirms the use of anthrax and other deadly germs on tests aboard ships in the Caribbean and off the Scottish coast during the 1950s. The document states: 'Tacit approval for simulant trials where the public might be exposed was strongly influenced by defence security considerations aimed obviously at restricting public knowledge. An important corollary to this was the need to avoid public alarm and disquiet about the vulnerability of the civil population to BW [biological warfare] attack.'

      Sue Ellison, spokeswoman for Porton Down, said: 'Independent reports by eminent scientists have shown there was no danger to public health from these releases which were carried out to protect the public.

      'The results from these trials_ will save lives, should the country or our forces face an attack by chemical and biological weapons.'

      Asked whether such tests are still being carried out, she said: 'It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research.'"

    • 2 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • continuing...
      "In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii , which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius.

      The report also reveals details of the DICE trials in south Dorset between 1971 and 1975. These involved US and UK military scientists spraying into the air massive quantities of serratia marcescens bacteria, with an anthrax simulant and phenol.

      Similar bacteria were released in 'The Sabotage Trials' between 1952 and 1964. These were tests to determine the vulnerability of large government buildings and public transport to attack. In 1956 bacteria were released on the London Underground at lunchtime along the Northern Line between Colliers Wood and Tooting Broadway. The results show that the organism dispersed about 10 miles. Similar tests were conducted in tunnels running under government buildings in Whitehall.

      Experiments conducted between 1964 and 1973 involved attaching germs to the threads of spiders' webs in boxes to test how the germs would survive in different environments. These tests were carried out in a dozen locations across the country, including London's West End, Southampton and Swindon. The report also gives details of more than a dozen smaller field trials between 1968 and 1977.

      In recent years, the MoD has commissioned two scientists to review the safety of these tests. Both reported that there was no risk to public health, although one suggested the elderly or people suffering from breathing illnesses may have been seriously harmed if they inhaled sufficient quantities of micro-organisms.

      However, some families in areas which bore the brunt of the secret tests are convinced the experiments have led to their children suffering birth defects, physical handicaps and learning difficulties.

      David Orman, an army officer from Bournemouth, is demanding a public inquiry. His wife, Janette, was born in East Lulworth in Dorset, close to where many of the trials took place. She had a miscarriage, then gave birth to a son with cerebral palsy. Janette's three sisters, also born in the village while the tests were being carried out, have also given birth to children with unexplained problems, as have a number of their neighbours."
      continuing....

    • 2 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • Image
    • Hi Plato, I think this is like a Pandora's Box, here is a story i pulled, recommended by the maker of the video i've put next - this is from 2002 - and suggests germ warfare experiments...

      "Millions were in germ war tests: Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials.

      Antony Barnett, public affairs editor
      The Observer, Sunday 21 April 2002 10.23 BST
      Article history
      The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.
      A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.

      Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.

      While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments.

      The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution.

      The tests, carried out by government scientists at Porton Down, were designed to help the MoD assess Britain's vulnerability if the Russians were to have released clouds of deadly germs over the country.

      In most cases, the trials did not use biological weapons but alternatives which scientists believed would mimic germ warfare and which the MoD claimed were harmless. But families in certain areas of the country who have children with birth defects are demanding a public inquiry.

      One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.

      While the Government has insisted the chemical is safe, cadmium is recognised as a cause of lung cancer and during the Second World War was considered by the Allies as a chemical weapon."

      continued below....

    • 2 years ago
  • PlatoTacius
    • 0
      PlatoTacius  
    • I'm curious about whether they tested the substances on animals first...

      I'm also curious to know more about the exposure of this very important issue...

      SeaJade, thanks for bringing this to our attention. If we don't continue to investigate this ourselves, then we won't know the answers... we can't expect our military or the government to disclose what they are up to...with total disregard for the public trust...

    • 2 years ago
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • Thank you mae, here is an extract from the link mae posted...

      "THE METHODIC DEMISE OF NATURAL EARTH

      By Dr. R. Michael Castle PhD
      June 26, 2009
      NewsWithViews.com

      In this century, we believe we are witnessing the gradual, purposeful demise of the Earth's Natural System. There are those who will debunk/dis-info all that is written regarding the subject of this paper: ChemTrails. What's this? ChemTrails are only a vague description, in lay-terms, of a greater theater of toxic materials being released into the atmosphere/stratosphere, for a myriad of crude and toxic agendas.

      Dr. R. Michael Castle, will attempt to put this Global debacle into a profile of events. Technical specificity of all the identified components would require at least a book in length, to recite them all. A short Bibliography follows, and links to various pertinent documents of unquestionable validity.

      First Rule of Understanding: There are very large, winner-take-all games orchestrated by the Global Interests of the World. We have investigated, researched and found substantial evidence of a multiplicity of Global operations designed to mitigate various and theoretical Global catastrophes, as defined by a late 1980's and 1990's International Panel of Conferees. (The value of who are they, what's the politics smell like and all that is not of the utmost importance in our attempt, herein, to describe what serious destruction they have caused and are causing to Humans and our Finite Environment. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

      Many of the operations we have collectively found in our investigations of this debacle have remained a secret, classified and not for general populace information or knowledge. You must answer the question, Dear Reader as to why someone would possibly deploy these Geo-weapons.

      Just follow the money trails. We will yield all of our voluminous data, information and all references we have used in our validation of facts surrounding this Global atrocity. The recipients of this information must be interested enough in what we are trying to expose, the Human-health risks, the Environmental risks and the plain, simple "wrongness" that prevails. We must determine first if you are provoked to really care, because the research and development of this information for a Major Media whistle-blowing expose will require passion and dedication. Our research work has spanned almost five years of....watching and discovering, with disgust, the scenarios which follow.

      This is not a small task.....but the Mission is simple. Expose and Stop the Methodic Demolition of our Natural Earth and its inhabitants.

      Executive Summary

      Dr. Edward Teller wrote a white paper in the late 1990's describing a remedial operation, strategy, epic-in-proportion, to change the predicted course of what was believed by an International group of Scientists, including Dr. Edward Teller, Livermore National Laboratories, et al, to be the cataclysmic certainty from the results of global-warming, crisis level Ultra-Violet/Cosmic radiation, crisis Ozone-layer depletion and other theoretical doom. (Edward Teller's "Sun Screen" Document - PDF) Demonstrating here, that the same mind, Dr. Edward Teller, Father H-Bomb, was responsible for many ill-conceived strategies and not one gave considerations to the consequences in the Human realm. Safety, toxicity, lethality, exposure, Environmental Impact, morality, were not words with which Dr. Teller had a high-degree of familiarity. (WHO IS EDWARD TELLER?)"

    • 2 years ago
  • mae37
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • Conspiracy "nuts" have been claiming this for years...and getting called nut cases.
      Well....I for one have believed them for some time. Ran across a man a few years ago who flew one of those unmarked airplanes that spew chemicals.
      He wasn't sure what the mix was, but he knew it weren't ice crystals for "cloud seeding".

      Also, in the late 70s, early 80s, there was a small blurb in a newspaper, too many years for me to remember which one....a rancher in a rather remote section of Utah came upon a bunch of dead sheep, a horse or two and one of his missing dogs. All had dried blood on their mouth.

      There is no doubt it was an experiment or possibly an accident. I go with the experiment theory.

      As long as those who believe this are labeled nut cases, no one that could possibly do anything about will listen.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • As soon as I heard Weather Modification Act here I knew what they were talking about. Kay Bailey Hutchinson, a Republican Senator from Texas introduced the Weather Modification Act on the floor in March 2005. Now, do I believe the government would experiment with chemicals like this without telling us? We're eating food with GMOs that many are unaware of, and there are thousands of pollutants in our world that are poisoning us daily that we don't know about. So where it concerns a company making a profit and getting them a campaign contribution, you bet your a** they would.

    • 2 years ago
  • SeaJade
  • ras_menelik
  • bjm1989
  • SeaJade
    • 0
      SeaJade  
    • Image
    • "This paper has been prepared by the Climate and Energy: Science and Analysis
      Division of the Department of Energy and Climate Change, as a preliminary
      assessment of geo-engineering options to mitigate the effects of anthropogenic
      greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions on climate."

      A few extracts:
      "Geo-engineering, defined here as intentional large-scale manipulation of the global
      environment, has been suggested as a means of mitigating the effects of
      anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions on climate, without necessarily reducing
      emissions. "
      "A number of geo-engineering options for mitigating the effects of anthropogenic
      greenhouse-gas emissions on climate have been proposed. In this paper, we
      consider a number of proposals, under two main headings: (i) alteration of the
      Earth’s radiation balance, which involves either reducing the amount of sunlight
      that reaches the Earth using space shades/mirrors, or increasing the proportion of
      incident sunlight that is reflected back into space using stratospheric aerosols,
      tropospheric aerosols or changes in the land/ocean surface; and (ii) removal and
      storage of atmospheric CO2, which involves capturing CO2 from the atmosphere
      through ocean fertilisation (using iron addition or ocean pipes), marine-algae
      cultivation, electrochemically-induced increases in ocean alkalinity or ̳air capture‘
      schemes (such as ̳synthetic trees‘). "
      "10
      4.i.b. Stratospheric aerosols
      This technique aims to cool the Earth‘s troposphere and surface by increasing the
      backscattering of radiation in the stratosphere (which increases planetary albedo) using airborne sub-microscopic particles such as sulphate, metals, dielectrics, resonant scatterers or dust [A12]. These aerosol particles would be created by
      releasing aerosol precursors into the stratosphere. This could be done by: releasing
      precursors at the Earth‘s surface and allowing them to be carried into the
      stratosphere; firing them into the stratosphere from the Earth‘s surface; or delivering
      them into the stratosphere using high-altitude balloons or aircraft [B2] (possibly by
      addition to aviation fuel, which could reduce the cost of delivery [Q15]). Injection
      could either take place in the tropics (with the aim of obtaining global coverage) or in
      the Arctic (with the aim of reducing warming in this region, which is particularly
      vulnerable to anthropogenic climate change).
      There are a number of uncertainties about the potential impacts of these schemes on
      the environment21,22. In particular, the effects of stratospheric aerosols on the climate
      system are not fully understood [AD4] — although they are known to affect circulation
      patterns, stratospheric ozone concentrations (which affect climate) [AD2] and upper
      tropospheric cloud formation (a particular concern is that these schemes could
      increase the cover of high cirrus clouds in the tropics, which could increase
      warming). Changes observed after volcanic eruptions (which can inject aerosols into
      the stratosphere) suggest that the climatic response to stratospheric aerosol forcing
      is regionally variable [AD3]. In particular, they indicate that there may be significant
      decreases in precipitation over land23 (which could lead to drought) and changes in
      the North Atlantic Oscillation (which could lead to warmer winters over Eurasia) [B6].
      The potential impact of the schemes on ecosystems also remains uncertain, but
      aerosols can affect photosynthesis by increasing the amount of diffuse solar radiation
      and decreasing the amount of direct solar radiation [A14] and can cause
      environmental pollution. "

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos