Community | July 02, 2009 | 53 comments

Let’s Do Something - ANYTHING!!!

Image
shanklinmike
Facts. Costs. Consequences.


***This article has been chosen as a discussion topic on PFP Movement Radio, http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pfpmovementradio Friday night at 6pm-8pm. Please Call In To The Show, 347-633-9636. COMMENTS will be included in the show so feel free to discuss or ask questions here on current.com as they will be addressed during the show. This article will also air on Freedom Hour Saturday at 9pm-10pm on Movement TV http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?page_id=36***
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Culture,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Culture 8 more
  3.     
    |

53 comments // Let’s Do Something - ANYTHING!!!

  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • You asked for an example in favor of capitalism? Well, the fact that until Hussein, we have enjoyed the highest standard of living per capita - compared to the rest of the world. People from all over this planet wanted to come to America - to them, the very name was synonimous with freedom, prosperity, opportunity. Is that not enough for your dense commie brain? My family came here for these reasons - so I know first hand. As to you admitting your commie roots - dude - you are one dumb motherfucker - sorry for the insult - but there is no better word for you. The system you ignorantly support has failed in most countries already - and is dying off in the remaining ones. To want the same for America is suicidal. In fact, only an enemy or an idiot would want this - which one are you? A bit of both?

    • 2 years ago
  • KCHARLES
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • KCHARLES:

      @kcharles - Labor was "shipped" (as you call it) overseas under possibly good intentions to promote 2-way trade. The fact that it became a 1-way street is a mistake of the previous administration. Then there was your messiah's campaign promise to bring it back to the US. And now, this new energy bill will have quite the opposite effect on labor - so herein lies a hypocrisy of your libtard party and your devious leader, who is actively working to breaking down what once was the greatest country in the world... Got it?

    • 2 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • Image
    • Ham - perhaps - perpaps you shouldn't talk if you don't know what the fuck you are saying. "raping cheap labor", "greed", etc - my boy - you are a fucking commie, aren't you? Have you read your recent issue of Pravda? Where did you pick up those terms?

      It is entirely American to seek competitiveness by tapping into cheaper labor sources. However, when the mood is (and the pre-election broken promises) to bring labor back home - to employ more people, to up the quality of products, etc - and Hussein issues a mandate whereby the manufacturers will be allotted only certain "carbon credits" - determined by the Fed - and penalized for consumption exceeding these credits - most if not all will look to further outsource their labor.

      In your leftard zeal - you are attacking the very principle of the newly proposed legislation. You don't yet see the fallacy of your statements - just like you don't yet see the fallacy of your choice of messiah and your entire liberal platform. You people only learn when the truth slams you in the face - else you are an ingorant bunch!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • igordy:

      I am more communist than I am Capitalist. Just because a thing is "Entirely American" does not make it right. If that is your argument it is seriously flawed and without and merits logically.

      As far as the legislation, I am against it, so I am not sure how it matters that I am attacking the principle of the newly proposed legislation.

      I have yet to see you present a single argument in favor of Capitalism and the "free" market that is not an ad hominem attack against your opposition. (are those words too big for you? I could make them smaller for you to understand if you'd like.)

    • 2 years ago
  • akamaial
    • 0
      akamaial [removed]  
    • igordy:

      igordy could and often does lay down a clear and concise analogy about various issues that may be the subject at hand, and yet the following responses are most often knee-jerk and not understood by liberalosts after the 1st paragraph (seemingly their brains cramp up) letting loose an endless babble of utter nonsense out of the socialost/democratic party manual/mantra

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • Libtards and Socialists want nothing more than to save the sky above the US, while the labor is shipped off to other countries. So let's see - we lose even more manufacturing, our companies have to pay heavy fines for spending more carbon credits than arbitrarily allocated by the all-knowing Federal Government, Gore makes more billions, America gets weakened even more, we get a patch of the blue sky - and other countrie's pollution does not affect our little island here - and everyone is happy. What a crock of shit - and a bunch of motherfuckers!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • igordy:

      When corporations ship manufacturing overseas, it is NOT because labor is so expensive here that they can not make a profit. They ship it overseas because they can make MORE of a profit by raping cheap labor in third world countries. It is GREED that causes this, not liberals or labor. Labor produces ALL WEALTH ON EARTH. If you can not understand this, perhaps you should not be allowed to speak without a license.

    • 2 years ago
  • nikelibertate
    • 0
      nikelibertate  
    • igordy:

      Labor produces all the wealth? How? They need people to employ them. They don't create the wealth, they benefit from those who do. A man who starts a company is part of labor and yes he looks for ways to maximize profit while minimizing cost, however most heads of companies look for the most skilled and talented labor they can afford and pay them competitively in order to keep them. Before the minimum wage was introduced most skilled labor made far above the minimum, it was unskilled labor that was hurt by it. The unions pushed it to keep competition from below in check. Unions always use violence and force because most of their jobs are not so skilled as not to be easily replaced by another worker willing to work for the same wages or less.

    • 2 years ago
  • akamaial
    • 0
      akamaial [removed]  
    • Sadly stupidity is rampant, this information just cannot be absorbed, sorted and comprehended by the leftist/socialosts, as it is outside of the party doctrinal mantra...it is enough to make a sane man weep...and I weep !

    • 2 years ago
  • HowdyDo
    • 0
      HowdyDo  
    • Man! Damned if they do and damned if they don't! Congress FINALLY grows some and passes legislation to help the environment (Greenpeace doesn't like it b/c they think it's not tough enough) and all people can do is complain. Cap & Trade will make pruducts whose manufacture creates more pollution more expensive - that is the ONLY way the government will be able to convince businesses to reduce pollution - hit their bottom line. AND they have to level the competitive playing field by making it expensive for other countries to exceed our limits - thru tariffs - give them a break!!

    • 2 years ago
  • nikelibertate
    • 0
      nikelibertate  
    • HowdyDo:

      You don't get it! IT WON"T PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT! It will however raise the prices of everything and lose the US even more jobs during a depression. It's yet another tax and it will increase our dependency on foreign oil. You should read the 1500 pgs of it since none of our reps seemed to, especially the last 300 pgs that were submitted that same morning. Wake the hell up!

    • 2 years ago
  • metalcookiesxy70
  • metalcookiesxy70
  • adamsmithfreedom
    • 0
      adamsmithfreedom [removed]  
    • metalcookiesxy70:

      Hi metal,

      This article is discussing not only the lack of transparency allowed in the drafting of the bill, but also the inability for those in Congress to read the bill they are voting on because its 1200 pages in what, 12 hours? This article also talks about the costs associated with the bill and the price distortions that will created deadweight social loss.

    • 2 years ago
  • trut
  • kennymotown
  • adamsmithfreedom
  • akamaial
  • adamsmithfreedom
    • 0
      adamsmithfreedom [removed]  
    • bomb....

      Where were the libertarians the last 8 years? Being ignored by the media as always.....the media is just an avenue for the two parties and special interests....they all have an agenda. The liberty supporters are always ignored by the lobbyists, government oligopolizers, and protectionists. This recording was from 2003!

    • 2 years ago
  • HowdyDo
    • 0
      HowdyDo  
    • Man! Damned if they do and damned if they don't! Congress FINALLY grows some and passes legislation to help the environment (Greenpeace doesn't like it b/c they think it's not tough enough) and all people can do is complain. Cap & Trade will make pruducts whose manufacture creates more pollution more expensive - that is the ONLY way the government will be able to convince businesses to reduce pollution - hit their bottom line. AND they have to level the competitive playing field by making it expensive for other countries to exceed our limits - thru tariffs - give them a break!!

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • HowdyDo:

      Cap and Trade will NOT make it more expensive to pollute. It will make polluting a business. Are there any people in America capable of even the slightest ammount of critical thinking?

    • 2 years ago
  • akamaial
  • numinant
  • Ricky84
  • numinant
  • nikelibertate
  • nikelibertate
    • 0
      nikelibertate  
    • When Al Gore speaks is he objective? He stands to make a fortune on his carbon credit company and his investments in green technology. Isn't that selfish and unethical? Not to mention a conflict of interest.

    • 2 years ago
  • bullpcp
    • 0
      bullpcp  
    • It's sometimes unimaginable the extent to which people will rely on feelings and ideologies in direct opposition to reality to achieve solutions that destroy what they would protect. Hell even the EPA said it was worthless.

    • 2 years ago
  • adveritas
  • adamsmithfreedom
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • adveritas:

      this always happens with the peacefreedomeandteddybearhuggateria posts. they just appear in the top ten. Almost always the same people posting positive remarks which are usually very similar to the same ones they posted earlier. They appear to all know each other..

    • 2 years ago
  • nikelibertate
  • adamsmithfreedom
  • curtisreed
  • 2hellnwait
  • adamsmithfreedom
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • I have no idea what this article is about as you have set it up so I have to go to your website and thus give you advertising revenues. You clearly are doing this intentionally.

      Also, why do you not tag your articles with US Politics so it goes to the US Politics channel like everyone elses articles about US Politics? Instead you skip that so it goes directly to the front page.

      Your ideology is a joke and your ethics are appalling. Par for the course.

    • 2 years ago
  • curtisreed
  • adveritas
    • 0
      adveritas  
    • neocongo:

      I think he was being more straight forward and understandable than the article was, which is just a bunch of 'hooraa' words and false references and loaded terms to get people excited over nothing. The Adam Smith and peace freedom garbage is ridiculous middle school drama. You guys remind me of characters you'd see on family guy.

    • 2 years ago
  • titvol
  • nikelibertate
    • 0
      nikelibertate  
    • neocongo:

      Actually, you are wrong about the revenue thing since the site only makes revenue if you click on the banner adds, so they make nothing if you don't.How exactly is that unethical anyway? Huffpo and other sites have banner adds as well to support their sites.

      The fact that your views are all over the news and web is fine, but no one is allowed to think differently than you? That's rather irrational and unfair, not to mention biased.

      As far as ideology, I have nothing against taking care of the environment, but the cure can't be worse than the disease. We rushed into corn ethanol and it ended up offsetting food production, raising the prices and lowering the availability of other food commodities such as wheat, and was found to be useless as a CO2 measure because it took as much energy to produce as it gave.

      Right now, the country is facing a depression. The Cap and Trade will increase our dependency on foreign oil, increase the prices of energy and all consumer goods, decrease jobs across all sectors and you talk about our ethics? Do you care how many people will suffer under this bill? Not to mention it will mandate household audits and create more bureaucracy while simultaneously protecting the polluters. Read the Greenpeace article I posted, maybe then you'll get a clue. It's being misrepresented by the media, it won't do what you think it will. You also should check out Spain's problems, they've lost 2.2 jobs for every "green" job they created.

    • 2 years ago
  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • neocongo:

      adveritas, "you guys remind me of characters you'd see on Family Guy." Do liberals like you get their entertainment from a cartoon show geared towards adults? Sad,sad,sad. I quit watching cartoons when I was, hell, 10-11 years old. (But that was before we started dumbing down people with assinine cartoons like "Family Guy" or "Ren & Stimpy.") I have never watched "adult" cartoons like Family Guy, why would I wish to lower my IQ 50 points?? Grow up, and get a grip on reality.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • neocongo:

      All other arguments aside on this article, which I have not yet read, the Founding Fathers were human like me. Their ideologies are no more relevant or important than my own. They are nor gods who's ideas should be worshipped or thought of as sacrosanct.

    • 2 years ago
  • titvol
  • adveritas
    • 0
      adveritas  
    • neocongo:

      I replied because someone above replied first with an observation that was quite valid and someone esle had to make fun of him. You never watch cartoons, never see them in the newspaper? They might be about cheap jokes and laughs but they certainly have a lot to say about the rediculous people that pretend they they are intellegent and that they have important things to say but they do nothing. So sorry if it gives me the pleasure to enjoy comedy because if I couldn't I really don't know how I'd cope with reading this garbage and knowing that you people really think the way you do. Have you even taken a history class? Read Zelikow's Uses of History.

    • 2 years ago
  • nikelibertate
  • trut
  • nikelibertate
    • 0
      nikelibertate  
    • nikelibertate:

      I'm not telling any half truths, your representatives are! The truth is that we will see sky-rocketing energy costs that will not benefit the environment, so what is the real point of this bill? It will not get us results and it will help to destroy our job market further during a severe economic recession. The military will still be exempt from EPA regulation and they are the largest consumer of energy resources and the biggest polluters. So the regular people in this country will get screwed, again, in order to do absolutely nothing about the supposed problem that it addresses. Where is the half truth in pointing out that you are being bamboozled?

    • 2 years ago
  • igordy
    • 0
      igordy [removed]  
    • Image
    • Good article, Mike. What can I say? Let's hope the fucking bill dies in the senate - else we are going to continue to get fucked by this administration. The tide is going to turn - it has to - and the swing back is going to be a bitch to all these fucking liberals, tree-huggers, commies, lefties, arabophiles, etc. I can't wait...

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • NJPatriot
more from Community:

top videos