TWO STATE TO NOWHERE

Saudi participation is a different matter. America has long defended Israel, right or wrong. Stepping aside while Israel attacks is expected even from Obama, a man who seems intent on holding talks with every radical on the globe. The Saudis however have been the epicenter of Arab outrage against Israel. Though less directly involved than Iran in instigating proxy wars in the Holy Land, they have traditionally been more ideologically aligned with their Persian neighbors than their Jewish bogymen.

But the Saudis supposedly lack nukes. A better armed Iran poses perpetual threats not only to Israel, but to the Saudi royal family as well. It is in Saudi Arabia’s interest to neuter Iran’s military might while not actually lifting a sword. This explains why a Mossad man who maintains a dialogue with the House of Saud claims that the King will ignore Israeli jets flying over his Kingdom if bombing runs are required.

For Arab instigators to suddenly cooperate with the Hebrew nation is one of those jaw dropping instances in history where you wonder if the world has gone terribly sane.

This has not gone un

For Hamas liberating all of Palestine to establish an Islamic state requires a holy war against Israel. Anyone daring to sign away even “a grain of sand in Palestine in favor of the enemies of God…who have seized the blessed land” should have their “hand be cut off.”

http://www.hnn.us/articles/93706.html

continued:

White House after hearing the President discourse in rambling fashion about Middle Eastern Affairs, ‘I‘ve read of men who thought they might be King of the Jews and other men who thought they might be King of the Arabs, but this is the first time I ‘ve listened to a man who dreamt of being King of both the Jews and Arabs.’”1

Herbert Feis, a State Department economic advisor, did not say this about President Obama’s address in Cairo in June 2009, but after Franklin D. Roosevelt met with Ibn Saud, King of Saudi Arabia, in February 1945. Roosevelt wanted the Arabs to allow thousands of Jews from Europe to immigrate to Palestine to which Ibn Saud responded, “Arabs would choose to die rather than yield their land to Jews.”2

George Antonius, an Arab nationalist, reiterated this point when he said, “no room can be made in Palestine for a second nation except by dislodging or exterminating the nation in possession.”3

Attempts to solve the Arab/Israeli conflict regularly fail because of the refusal to acknowledge that this dispute has never been about borders, territory or settlements, but about the Arabs' refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist. “The struggle with the Zionist enemy is not a matter of borders, but touches on the very existence of the Zionist entity,” declared an Arab spokesman.4

Unlike the Nazis who carefully concealed the Final Solution, Hamas and the Palestine Authority openly avow their intentions in their Charter and Covenant and in the Arab media which is available in English on the Internet on MEMRI and the Palestinian Media Watch.

For Hamas liberating all of Palestine to establish an Islamic state requires a holy war against Israel. Anyone daring to sign away even “a grain of sand in Palestine in favor of the enemies of God…who have seized the blessed land” should have their “hand be cut off.”5

Coercing Israel to make concessions and accept a two-state solution will not bring peace to the region. One-sided concessions have convinced the Arabs of the rightness of their policies and the efficacy of using violence to cleanse the country of Jews and Christians.

What compelling reaso