Community | July 12, 2009 | 17 comments

Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'

Image
goldenways
Former US Vice-President Dick Cheney gave direct orders to the CIA to conceal an intelligence programme from Congress, US media reports say.

The existence of the programme, set up after 9/11, was hidden for eight years and even now its nature is not known.

CIA director Leon Panetta is said to have abandoned the project when he learnt of it last month.

He has now told a House committee that Mr Cheney was behind the secrecy, the unnamed US sources say.

There has been no comment from Mr Cheney.


The claims come amid an increasingly bitter row between the CIA and Congress over whether key information was withheld about other aspects of the agency's operations.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has claimed that the CIA misled her about interrogation methods including waterboarding, while other senior Democrats have quoted Mr Panetta as admitting that his agency regularly misled Congress before he took office.

Details of the newly-revealed secret programme have still not been divulged, but sources say it did not relate to the CIA's rendition programme, interrogation methods or a controversial domestic surveillance project.

Officials quoted by the New York Times say the programme was launched by anti-terror operatives at the CIA soon after the 2001 attacks, and involved planning and training but never became fully operational.

Another unnamed official told AP it was an embryonic intelligence-gathering effort, aimed at yielding intelligence that would be used to conduct covert operations abroad.

Sources have told a number of US media outlets Mr Cheney personally instructed the CIA to withhold information about the programme from Congress.

Mr Panetta - who took over directorship of the CIA under President Obama's administration - is said to have learnt about the programme only on 23 June.

The next day he called an emergency meeting with congressional intelligence committees to tell them about its existence and to say that it was being cancelled, the reports say.

Veto threat

The allegations come as Democrats in Congress are trying to push through new rules that would increase the number of members of Congress who are told about covert operations.

The White House is threatening to veto the bill, fearing that operational secrecy could be compromised.

The CIA has not commented on the reports of Mr Cheney's role.

"It's not agency practice to discuss what may or may not have been said in a classified briefing," said spokesman Paul Gimigliano.

"When a CIA unit brought this matter to Director Panetta's attention, it was with the recommendation that it be shared appropriately with Congress. That was also his view, and he took swift, decisive action to put it into effect."

A CIA spokesman insisted earlier this week that "it is not the policy or practice of the CIA to mislead Congress."
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   News and Information,   4 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics US 10 more
  3.     
    |

17 comments // Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'

  • s0uthc0ast
  • reconmom
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • DICK CHENEY DID IT

      And yet this issue, the economic crisis as a political problem, has still not hit home, or outraged public opinion as the reports about that the man we all love to hate. The Dick Cheney has been outed by CIA Director for keeping Congress in the Dark about some of his most paranoid programs.Its hard for me to believe that members of Congress were as uninformed as they claim—what country were they living in, didn’t they read all the exposes. In any event, reality is not reality unless the front page of the New York Times takes note, as it did Sunday:

      The Daily Beast made sense of the Timese language—used to bury important details this way:

      More secrets emerge about the Bush administration. Former Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the concealment of a secret CIA counterterrororism program for eight years, The New York Times reports, though the scope of the program is unknown. CIA Director Leon Panetta told the Senate and House intelligence committees that he ended the program when he first learned about it from subordinates on June 23. Officials say the program did not involve the much-criticized CIA interrogation program or domestic intelligence gathering.

      “They have said the program was started by the counterterrorism center at the C.I.A. shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, but never became fully operational, involving planning and some training that took place off and on from 2001 until this year,” The Times reports. Congressional officials differ on the program’s significance. The news comes on the heels of an inspectors general report that said only three lawyers in the Department of Justice knew of President Bush’s secret domestic wiretapping program.

      Newsweek had more suggesting that the cautiously cautious Obamacrats, possibly emboldened with their leader in Africa are hinting that they might do Something although our attorney decision is hoping that “that whatever decision I make would not have a negative impact on the president’s agenda.” He is talking about himself here.

      The Obama administration may not be so quick to “turn the page,” after all: Newsweek reports that Attorney General Eric Holder “is now leaning toward appointing a prosecutor to investigate the Bush administration’s brutal interrogation practices, something the president has been reluctant to do.” Holder’s decision could come within weeks and Holder himself says “I hope that whatever decision I make would not have a negative impact on the president’s agenda,” he says. “But that can’t be a part of my decision.” Holder has asked for a list of 10 candidates for special prosecutor, five from within the administration and five from without.

      What can we expect? Most of the journalists who covered this most intensely fear a cover-up:

      Rob Kall of Op Ed News: Attorney General Holder Considering Opening Torture Investigation– Like the Failed Abu Ghraib Lynddie England Coverup? A limited investigations of the worst torture abuse could bopened by AG Holder, but probably not investigations into John Yoo and torture policy and decision makers.

      Jason Leopold reminds us:

      Yoo Gave Bush White House Retroactive Legal Cover to Spy on Americans

      The President’s Surveillance Program (PSP) was far more expansive than the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), the report said, while the TSP allowed the NSA to spy on Americans’ telephone calls without a warrant. The PSP went much further and remains classified and Yoo worked directly with White House officials on the PSP as he was the only official in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel who was aware of program

    • 2 years ago
  • thestupidtimes
  • Valence
  • Sumbodyswatchin
    • 0
      Sumbodyswatchin  
    • Valence:

      unfortunately we have no idea. could be about torture, could be about wiretapping, probably going to be something else entirely. i wait eagerly to see what else what hidden from public view to serve the maniacal ambitions of a lunatic.

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
    • 0
      montesooma  
    • Just to update you the letter in which 7 democrats say that panetta said these things has been determined to be a phony, yes that is right panetta says no such thing.
      This is a scam to try to save pelosi's reputation for having carelessly lied in her zeal to excuse herself from having no problem with advanced interrogation teqniques. She lied and you should take with a grain of salt the low class posturing that these people practice.
      They are masters at misdirecting the public.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sumbodyswatchin
    • 0
      Sumbodyswatchin  
    • montesooma:

      lay off the neo-con koolaid dude. take a deep breath, smoke some grass, and try to realise that everything you hold to be true is false. then come back and participate in the conversation. and if you choose not to, then have a pleasant day

    • 2 years ago
  • bluestranger
  • Eleganza
    • 0
      Eleganza  
    • montesooma:

      Monte lives in his own universe, it has nothing to do with reality, Some people just cannot accept that the Republican train has pulled into the station and the ride is over...but they just won't get off.

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
    • 0
      montesooma  
    • montesooma:

      eleganza -- why whould i care about the republicans?
      The only difference between them and the progressives is they wouldn't sell us out quite as fast as the progressives.
      I wouldn't like yourself, take seriously a story the says that the evil dick cheney ordered the cia to "hide" a plan --when there are no details of the "plan".
      We are just supposed to post our disgust that cheney hid a plan.
      The story says "Sources have told a number of US media outlets Mr Cheney personally instructed the CIA to withhold information about the programme from Congress."
      Who are these "sources" nancy pelosi? john kerry? harry reid?

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • The only person I have seen Dick Cheney embarrass is himself -- and he is free to speak out whenever he likes...just like the rest of us.

      Interesting dichotomy: the Director of the CIA says quite clearly that the CIA regularly misled Congress. The CIA's "spokesman," who presumably WORKS for the Director, says doing so is not the CIA's policy.

      The logical conclusion is that the CIA was violating its own policy...so I guess we can toss that up on top of the pile.

      The CIA is a critically important agency of our government. But that agency's power and the level of damage it can do to our national security, to our citizens and to our standing in the world requires constant vigilance on the part of those charged with overseeing their budget and operations.

      My recollections of Panetta are that he was exceptionally competent in his past occupations. I suspect that is why he was selected for this position. I wish him the best of luck...

    • 2 years ago
  • montesooma
    • 0
      montesooma  
    • you all are dumbasses, there is nothing in this story.
      The cia doesn't report every plan it makes, only when something is going to be carried out does it need to inform congress.
      This is nothing less than smokescreen to hide pelosi's lying about the cia -- don't force old dick to come out and embarass them again.
      There better off quitting while they still have their jobs.

    • 2 years ago
  • itchywolf
  • bluestranger
    • 0
      bluestranger  
    • We read these articles in complete and utter outrage. The real outrage is that nothing will come of this. At the most, some low level employee will do a few months and lose their retirement.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • I love the comment; it is not policy or practice of the CIA to mislead Congress. You will note that this avoids answering the direct question. Did you lie to Congress on this issue?

    • 2 years ago
  • bluestranger
more from Community:

top videos