Community | July 15, 2009 | 41 comments

Scaring America With Badly Designed Health Care Infographics | GOOD

Image
ras_menelik
Republicans have released the above graphic explaining how the Democratic health care plan will—or really won’t—work. This looks horrifying and bureaucratic. Nothing will be organized because the arrows between them are long and wavy; how will we possibly get our insurance? The humanity. Perhaps the flowchart could be designed in such a way that doesn’t make everything look like a mishegoss of inter-agency nightmares. Perhaps then it might seem a little less scary?

No matter how scared Republicans try to make us that nationalized health care wont be able to be explained in a clean flow chart, they may have very little to say about it.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a4.kYDWV9erc
  1. groups:
    Community,   US Politics,   Infoporn,   Conspiracy Theories,   2 more
  2. tags:
    News US Politics Health Care Republicans 2 more
  3.     
    |

41 comments // Scaring America With Badly Designed Health Care Infographics | GOOD

  • smurph25
  • Abraham99
    • 0
      Abraham99  
    • Buy it or not, the statistics I gave earlier can checked at
      www.rasmussenreports.com

      The poll was taken today.
      The people do not want Sotomayer, they do not Obama too much, they do NOT want public healthcare, and the exact figures are at the link I just gave above.

    • 2 years ago
  • couldntfindausername
    • 0
      couldntfindausername  
    • Abraham99:

      Ah yes, the company with polling showing that people on 20k a year think their taxes will go up if the top 1% of earners get a rate hike.

      Polling showing that people think US healthcare is simultaneously poor and amazing and needs to change and needs to stay the same ALL AT ONCE.

      No, sorry, gonna have to find better polling, their survey design in this area is poor, particularly compared to some of their other work.

    • 2 years ago
  • RickLD
    • 0
      RickLD  
    • dont ya find it odd.. only 15.7% of americans do not have some form of insurance. Bloomberg stats.. not mine. I've also heard.. that of tthe 15%.... 33% make over $50K a year, and could afford a private plan. another 33% are eligible for Medicaide / Medicare, but just havent enrolled. and the real humdinger .. 20% of the remaining 34%... are illegal immagrents.
      Not for sure where i heard these stats.. but for some reason they stuck in my head.

    • 2 years ago
  • Abraham99
    • 0
      Abraham99  
    • Strongly support Obama....29% July 16. Rasmussen poll

      Support Public health care....most Americans
      DO NOT want it and are comfortable with their own coverage they already have.

      July 16, Rasmussen poll

      Most Americans do not want Sotomayer

      Now, we see that the TV stations who supported Obama, have different findings from their polls.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • cztheday
  • bdtxusa
    • 0
      bdtxusa  
    • It's puzzling that Republicans keep bad-mouthing single-payer universal health care because they say our health care will be run by a "bureaucracy."

      Tell me please what our health care is currently run by. A BUREAUCRACY. It just happens to be a bureaucracy of private insurers. At least, if the government administers our single-payer funds, we will have a VOTE if we don't like what's being done. Currently, we have NO VOTE because private insurers tell our doctors what to do.

    • 2 years ago
  • Fourfingaz
    • 0
      Fourfingaz  
    • bdtxusa:

      Thank you for actually paying attention to whats actually happening. I'm tierd of doctors being tools and not being able to actually heal a problem from the base and not just suppress it with drugs. The things that they dont tell you is all drugs come from a natural substance from nature. They take it, brake it down, rebuild it a little differently so they cant put a patent on it and sell it to you @ 1000% mark up. These people need to Die and burn in gasoline and so do the ones who support these habits. Its great that some good things came out of it, but its gotten way way way out of control. Not FDA approved, For the right price..............

    • 2 years ago
  • RickLD
    • 0
      RickLD  
    • I dont care what party is trying to pass this bill...

      In the Declaration of Independence, we each are given the right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
      Each person can do as they wish, within the law, to fulfill these given rights.
      But, one person's happiness can not infringe upon anothers.
      So, why should I be paying for some joe blow to have health care. Yes, it is unfortunate that some people do not have any form of health care. That is why free
      health clinics were started. The American people
      are a caring, and giving people. That is, if they are
      allowed to be.
      OH, and what happened to this idea of Obahma's.
      You know, the one where for each dollar of new
      goverment programs, was going to be paid for by
      cutting a dollar from a different program.
      If he was to abide by his own rules, He might as well
      go ahead and completely cut out SS or maybe
      Medicare.
      Taxing the rich to pay for this health care , sounds good now to those who dont make much money.
      But, remember, when Income tax was first imposed,
      It was only the top 1% of the income bracket who had to pay..

    • 2 years ago
  • couldntfindausername
    • 0
      couldntfindausername  
    • RickLD:

      "So, why should I be paying for some joe blow to have health care."

      Because then your healthcare is cheaper, and your overall bill goes down. The current US system costs *everyone* more. The systems in place everywhere else in the developed world cost less.

      Paying less and getting more leaves people more healthy, for longer, and more free to pursue whatever form of happiness they like. Unless of course they enjoy having their choices in life limited by inefficient healthcare.

    • 2 years ago
  • RickLD
    • 0
      RickLD  
    • RickLD:

      So why dont they just pass a reform bill to cut down on the stupid lawsuits. If the doctors didnt have to pay out the ear for malpractice insurace, they could lower their rates. And, if that would happen, then insurance rates would lower. Making it more affordable for everyone.

    • 2 years ago
  • Fourfingaz
    • 0
      Fourfingaz  
    • RickLD:

      malpractice insurance.........These doctors are god damn murderers. Check the charts son. How many mistakes are buried EACH year. I bust my ass everyday and make more then the average american....my health insurance is one up from a bubble gum machine. Malpractice insurance my ass. Wake up. Its big Pharma,big yahts,Big houses........ We will never stop them. The government is the hope. Its sad but true.
      Um the mail works fine, Police, I feel pretty safe, um military....we blow alot of shit up. That seems to work fine. Something has to be done. The republicans bitch and complain its not going to work. Lets keep this Simple.................IF YOU DONT HAVE A BETTER WAY SHUT THE FUCK UP!

    • 2 years ago
  • brit50
    • 0
      brit50  
    • RickLD:

      Thanks Rick for your comments. It is sad how people really believe that a public healthcare plan would actually work. Even when you give deathly statistics to the effects of a healthcare plan. They choose not to listen. 70% of U.S. citizens are satisfied with the current healthcare plan. Its sad that people choose to believe that the gov't "is the hope" that is plain ridiculous. Gov't is not here to provide for my every need!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • RickLD
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • RickLD:

      " According to polls conducted by the New York Times,Wall Street Journal, NBC, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Consumers Union, the majority of Americans desire a public health insurance option."

      from link....

    • 2 years ago
  • Fourfingaz
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • brit50, are you drunk or some rich bastard pretending to be English, I mean i've seen a lot of republican stunts just like this lately.

    • 2 years ago
  • brit50
    • 0
      brit50  
    • Gov't healthcare will be a disaster. More taxes and gov't regulation. Sad really. I see a United States in front of my eyes becoming a socialist run country. We must stand up for conservatism and its roots which founded this country.

    • 2 years ago
  • couldntfindausername
    • 0
      couldntfindausername  
    • brit50:

      Government run healthcare costs less. A lot less. That means *smaller* bills.

      Anyone claiming that reform means "increased taxes" [net of a corresponding and much greater drop in non-taxation outgoings] is trying to pull the wool over your eyes.

    • 2 years ago
  • Fourfingaz
    • 0
      Fourfingaz  
    • brit50:

      The thing that pisses me off the most about neo cons is that you all sound like a broken fucking record. over and over and over the same bullshit with nothing really behind it to back up an actual thought. Taxes, gov reg.
      I'm tierd of fucking hearing this shit.
      The def. of conservative.......does not like change.......you might as well Just die cause we moving on.

    • 2 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • brit50:

      what does a brit know about it anyways.

      the majority of the world has such healthcare and it works fairly well (certainly a lot better than our system) for the majority of the world.

    • 2 years ago
  • brit50
    • 0
      brit50  
    • brit50:

      Are you people out of your minds. Where are you getting the facts that say that gov't healthcare will cost less. Gov't spending will increase. It is projected that spending by the federal gov't would increase by about $1.17 TRILLION over a nine yr period. This plan would increase federal spending by $452 BILLION, and more than 6 TRILLION over ten yrs!!!!. Obviously that means a very steep increase in taxes. Now lets take a look at gov't regulation. In Europe, there where 15000 people over 75 who died of cancer because they where not treated immediately. Essentialy, the gov't decided these people "weren't worth it" so they where treated much too late for any hope of being cured. What about the economy. We will see a loss in competition in both healthcare and pharmeuceutical companies because the gov't will decide who gets to do what. So, username do not say I dont have proof to back up my arguments. Where is your proof anyway?

    • 2 years ago
  • couldntfindausername
    • 0
      couldntfindausername  
    • brit50:

      US healthcare is less efficient and less effective at service provision than, well, everywhere else.

      And costs roughly twice as much.

      You pay more, get less, die quicker and have an excessive infant mortality rate [WHO and CIA statistics, freely available].

      Those with "government healthcare" pay less, and in general live longer [controlling for other factors], and are happier for it [the notion of "medical bills" and the resulting hardship as used in this context is pretty much a uniquely American construction].

      Every meaningful index says US healthcare delivery is broken, and that everywhere else in the world [using a pretty much every other permutation of service organisation] with even loosely comparable resources does it better.

      That's shameful, and a situation caused almost entirely by the likes of you and the sort of disinformation you spew here.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • Yes the times have changed quite a bit since the Clintons tried to change it. Now people are surviving from pay check to pay check if they even have a job. Let alone have any money to go to a doc. Sometimes I think people at the top 10% of the income scale don't have a clue how their tax cuts have broken the backs of the same Americans that slaved in their labor camps oh I mean their company's factory's to make them rich.
      It's time to give back and hell cut not only the Bush tax cuts but the Reagan tax cuts.

    • 2 years ago
  • ras_menelik
    • 0
      ras_menelik  
    • BO
      Spoke with members of the American Nurses Association today on the urgent need for health care reform: http://bit.ly/tbJHj 14 minutes ago from web

      Donate to Organizing for America's health care campaign by 12am Thurs, and you could come to Chicago: http://bit.ly/oBaO7 about 3 hours ago from web

      President: “Deferring reform is nothing more than defending the status quo,” opponents need to look at what they’re defending about 6 hours ago from web

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • I don't know how many of you have either investigated/studied the matter or were old enough to follow the debate during the last serious attempt at wholesale reform during Clinton's first term, but the Republicans tried EXACTLY this same tactic -- I remember seeing the chart. It was much more effective at that time, of course, if for no other reason than that we were in the early days of The Gingrich Rebellion.

      To the extent one can generalize about the "mood" of a people, Americans were much more skeptical of the benefits of universal healthcare coverage at that time. Unemployment was comparatively low, employers were still in the early days of passing along the costs of increased premiums to their employees.

      So that massive chart was one of the straws that broke the camel's back last time. I doubt it wil raise much of a stink this time except among those who would have opposed the bill in any form.

    • 2 years ago
  • ras_menelik
  • Fourfingaz
  • Mob_Barley
  • s0uthc0ast
    • 0
      s0uthc0ast  
    • Actually, this is probably the cleaned up version of 0's "health care" mashup.
      If Medicare and Medicaid are any indication, this is
      a disaster in the making which his teleprompter cannot get him out of.
      Here's a riddle:

      Two people, an aging alcoholic senator with brain cancer and a young girl with leukemia both need a helicopter ride to a hospital. There is one helicopter available with room for one person.

      Under 0's National Healthcare Plan who gets the pill
      and who get the helicopter?

    • 2 years ago
  • bsegovia
    • 0
      bsegovia  
    • I'm interested in the Canadian trend toward privatized, free-market health care. Maybe we can just trade systems? They've tried it for years and i guess they're ready for something that works better.

      Regardless of how this horrible eye-chart looks, I know I just want as many layers of bureaucracy between me and my doctor. Centrally planned, highly regulated economies work. Here's a great case study on a cheeky little country: http://www.mises.org/story/3564

    • 2 years ago
  • s0uthc0ast
    • 0
      s0uthc0ast  
    • bsegovia:

      Centrally planned, highly regulated economies DO NOT work.
      Remember the 75 year experiment called the Soviet Union?
      A disaster in all respects.
      Note that we are expected to emulate the systems supporting limited populations of Canada, France, Britain or Sweden.
      We are not a cheeky little country where this little model works.
      Where is the EU health care system?
      Why haven't the countries of European Union thrown over their systems for the centrally planned model for all?

    • 2 years ago
  • Fourfingaz
  • div
    • 0
      div  
    • bsegovia:

      This is nothing like what my local doctor's office is like. Walk in or otherwise. Yes, we do have long line ups, but at least we get care. (I live in Canada).

    • 2 years ago
  • couldntfindausername
    • 0
      couldntfindausername  
    • bsegovia:

      EU states all administer their own versions of socialised healthcare delivery. Some better in areas, worse in others.

      None costs as much or delivers as little as the US system. In fact they *all* cost significantly less, and after taking into account a demographic washout period for past histories of abject poverty or poor service delivery, we live longer.

      The primary reasons for not having an EU system [and for the record, there is an EU wide system of reciprocity in which individuals can access healthcare when outside their home nation] include the small matter of having lots of different primary languages, lots of different [compatible but not congruent] training systems and structures for healthcare professionals and a thousand others.

      The main reason we don't have "EU healthcare" is that we don't need it - everyone already *has* proper healthcare coverage.

      As for the "massive" US population - the largest state population is [open to correction] CA with about 37 million which is significantly less than quite a few EU member states.

    • 2 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • bsegovia:

      what nameless said, the rest of the developed world has some form of gov healthcare. it works better for some nations than others but it ALL works better than america's system.

      stop bullshitting.

    • 2 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • Scare tactics...as usual.
      However....as long as private insurance companies are allowed to add their own spin on things, our health insurance coverage will remain as it is...none or little for many Americans.

    • 2 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • Try drawing the current system; it might be a arrow pointing to deadend street for millions of Americans on one end and on the other a few fatcats with lots of money bulging from their pockets.

      Oh, that is what we will end up with again. Beg my pardon, my cynicism is showing through. oops.

    • 2 years ago
  • Abraham99
    • 0
      Abraham99  
    • Just by looking at the above graph it makes me disinterested. Like you said, that's probably why they showed it in that mixed up format.
      Anyway, I agree with the fact that something should be done, but it takes a lot of time and research. They should not just jump up and say, here it is.

    • 2 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • Abraham99:

      they could literally just model it on any number of the successful plans implemented by other developed nations, almost all of whom have some form of gov healthcare.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos