Community | July 18, 2009 | 5 comments

GOP Candidate: If We Lose Elections, We Still Have Guns

source: http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Va-GOP-Candidate-If-We-Lose-More-Elections-Well-Stil...

el_chivo
Catherine Crabill is a realtor and "home-schooling mother of four," and now a politician too! In her very first political race, Crabill is challenging Virginia state Del. Albert Pollard, D-Lancaster.

If you bet on such things as "elections," you should probably bet on "Albert Pollard, D-Lancaster" to dispose of this new political lady. You know why? Because she's apparently insane, and very violent.

Crabill recently attended one of those "Tea Parties," where conservatives like to meet up and complain about Barack Obama for an afternoon. In an address to fellow rally-mates, Crabill stressed the importance of this November's state elections in stopping Marxism. But hey, if it doesn't work, she suggested, we can always have a violent revolution to overthrow the government -- it's what the Founding Fathers wanted all along!



---read the rest clicking in the link
  1. groups:
    Community,   Failure IS an Option,   Guns
  2. tags:
    GOP,  Elections,  tea party,  Violence,  1 more
  3.     
    |

5 comments // GOP Candidate: If We Lose Elections, We Still Have Guns // Video

  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  

    • Why is it when Bush and Cheney were gutting the Constitution, torturing and spying on American citizens there were no tea-bagging neocons running around worried about losing freedoms or the tyrannical government taking over?

      Suddenly with this new administration all these freedoms are lost and "THEY" are coming to get "US". What is the possible reason for this new found paranoia?

    • 2 years ago
  • drewsuf721
    • 0
      drewsuf721  
    • eldamon:

      It is because that administration is continually being insulted by a fanatical "news" corporation that preys on simple minds. They tell the simple minds that their rights are being taken away now, not for the last eight years, but now. Then the simple minds get angry and go to corporate tea parties to mull around the idea of "liberty". If they cared about Liberty then they should respect what Laura and Euna were attempting to do on the border of N. Korea.

    • 2 years ago
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  

    • she doesn't sound like a nutter. she's right about the second amendment. the founding fathers were NOT defending our sporting goods. they repeatedly said that it appears to be an inevitable course for government to usurp more and more power and liberty and eventually become a tyrranical force.

      that is absolutely true. she isn't calling for war, but she's saying that if democracy fails, we won't roll over and let a tyrranical government oppress us.

      if you find that to be "frightening", I remind you that Thomas Jefferson wrote that "the tree of Liberty must be nourished from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots." He wasn't talking about deer hunting, was he?

    • 2 years ago
  • KCHARLES
  • eldamon
more from Community:
from the community

top videos