Community | July 27, 2009 | 43 comments

Who is next? You, your brother or your son?

source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_aj6aXxJqw

MotherForTruth
Jury Instructions are biased towards the accuser. In the past, the jury was instructed that rape allegations were easy to make but difficult for the defendant to disprove. Today, this instruction is no longer given--instead, juries are informed that medical evidence is not necessary to prove rape, and no witness is necessary, other than the alleged victim. Imagine! Could anyone escape a guilty verdict under these circumstances?

Rape Shield Laws do not allow a defendant to introduce the prior sexual conduct of the complainant. Thus, Rape Shield Laws that are intended to encourage more woment o come forward and testify have simply made it easier to falsely accuse and convict an innocent man. The testimony of any other woman who says a man has assaulted her is admissible in court, without evidence or corrobroation and whether she has ever reported the alleged crime to anyone or not.

Rape Trauma Syndrome is a name used in court to prove that a woman has been traumatized by rape, but is a term used to help convict men unfairly. If a woman immediately reports a rape, that is consistent with Rape Trauma Syndrome. If she waits months to report it, that behavior is also consistent with Rape Trauma Syndrome. If she cries, that signals Rape Trauma Syndrome. If she doesn't cry, that also signals Rape Trauma Syndrome. In short, the term, which is not a true diagnosis but a set of emotional responses, is used to the advantage of the accuser.

"To my considerable chagrin, we found that at least 60 percent of all the rape allegations were false." --Dr. Charles P. McDowell, Supervisory Special Agent, U.S. Air Force, Office of Special Investigations.
http://www.falserape.net/guilty.html
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Cultural Issues,   Law and Justice
  2. tags:
    Corruption,  Civil Rights,  Justice,  Rape,  8 more
  3.     
    |

43 comments // Who is next? You, your brother or your son? // Video

  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • Image

    • it has been found unconstitutional for shelters to discriminate....... Some of these shelters even refuse to allow young boys in if they are over 12 because they are seen as a "risk".....

      You can also look up www.shattrdmen.com and talk with some people who have gone through the same thing.

    • 2 years ago
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  
    • regjoeschmo:

      But might this pop the balloon of euphoric delight unto YWCA and Biden's associated cheerleader role for the

      Pay to hate,
      Discriminate,
      And invigorate,
      Ill-will?

      IV-mainlining has never been more plentiful.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  

    • dariusvons, your story is a common one. the police and the courts routinely ignore the abuse and mistreatment of males because the statistics perpetrate the myth and actually doing something about it would ruin billions in funding projects.....

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • regjoeschmo:

      it's funny you mention the funding projects... when the whole thing went down I was given information on domestic violence and local asistance programs only to find that there are no mens shelters here in boise, but there are quite a few womens and childrens shelters (who do not cater to nor allow men)... also there is only one 'mens home' that is there to help men get back on their feet... however it's only a halfway house for perolees. this, I think, demonstrates a clear bias for women.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  

    • kiltedandfree, When our judicial system encourage false accusation there will be many who will take advantage of the situation. Did you know that foreign brides have been easily gaining legal residence, thousands of dollars in assistance, housing, schooling, and more just as soon as she claims domestic violence? In fact there is absolutely no need for evidence and in some states she does not even need to testify in the court. Domestic violence and rape charges do not follow “innocent until proven guilty” in a court of law. There is an matchmaking organization that was recently on the news that was very successful at matching American men with foreign brides and coached new wives on how to clam abuse and get the process rolling. There are women who are manipulative and vindictive and there are women who have a need to be viewed as victims. In our society just about everyone is a victim of something... I encourage you to read the cases I posted earlier to fully understand the issues. These are very serious issues that do not get media attention for fear to be viewed as anti-women. Please notice what wins the public support: “women issues”, “tough on crime”, “gender equality”. In reality gender equality is only with respect to women, what about the equality for men? What about men’s issues? What about our boys who do not get the same benefits in education as girls? I can go on and give examples of these as well.
      The bottom line is the media and many government policies have created this view of American men as rapists, violent, aggressive, abusive, bad fathers, and stupid. American women on the other hand are presented as smart and always smarter then men, gentle, great mothers, victims, always abused, repressed, can do everything men can and better. This is simply not so. Men are in the disadvantaged position that women where 50 years ago.

    • 2 years ago
  • calm_incense
    • 0
      calm_incense  

    • kiltedandfree implies that pretty much every woman out there has been raped. Sorry, but I don't believe that. You say every woman you dated has her own "rape story". Where exactly are these rapes taking place? Who is committing them? How in the world does every woman get raped, unless the majority of men are rapists? You easily shrug off the statistics in this video, and yet cite your own statistic of nearly "100%" of women getting raped. Your evidence? Stories told to you by your ex-girlfriends. If falsifying rape claims has occurred in the past, and evidence points out that it most certainly has, what makes you think your ex-girlfriends are inherently more genuine? If a jury can be fooled, then certainly so can a sympathetic boyfriend.

      Sorry, but if it's true that just about every woman gets raped, we might as well just kill off all mankind and call it quits.

    • 2 years ago
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  
    • calm_incense:

      "we might as well just kill off all mankind and call it quits"

      Remarkably, that's what many fematicals suggest and advocate, quite "peaceful and calm" wouldn't you think?

      So, it seems pretty much the same as it ever was --

      Use,
      Use and misuse,
      Use and misuse to abuse,
      Use and misuse to abuse of Women,
      Use and misuse to abuse of women, together with the children and men who love them.

    • 2 years ago
  • DougChristian
  • kiltedandfree
    • 0
      kiltedandfree  

    • Mother, no one says it doesn't happen, but I seriously doubt the stats this video quoted. Yes, you can find cases where the woman has falsely accused some poor guy, but how many women can you find that have been raped at some time in their lives? Do you know that most, if not all, women have a rape story of their own? Lets say 10% of the women out use rape accusations but not 60%. Maybe that stat is growing, but I'd say there is a lot of anger and hatred by women for videos like this and men who are unfeeling when it comes to what a woman has to put up with. When I was dating, I found every woman I dated had their own rape story. And I think that was around 50 or so women that I knew who had been raped at some time. If I find 100% in the women I knew, how does that translate to the world at large? I'd say pretty close. Women have been raped by drunken cretins or their father, uncle or brother and they have to put up with date rape and date rape drugs that some guys think is funny to use. Then as it used to be, women were thought of as "wanting it" when in court. They had to endure a second rape in court. Often women are questioned about what they wore, as tho what a woman wears asks for rape. No one asks to be raped. To even attempt to use these stats to try to make people believe that 50 to 60% of women use rape accusations to get even is appalling and would only be used by cretin males who think women like it rough.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
  • kiltedandfree
  • SHAWN_RITTIMAN
  • JohnA
  • MotherForTruth
  • xiola
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  
    • MotherForTruth:

      Great post and ditto Xiola's note.

      In/of/from a land,
      Where prostitution appears legalized(fn1),
      Father/parenthood criminalized(fn2),
      For money idolized(fn3).

      Perhaps it truly is "sam/ne as it ever was."

      ----
      Fn1 - Amy Air Force Inc. and attempt for registering Fed TM for "hooker bootcamp." (suspect that a board member of registrant was a Judge (need to confirm)) in Nevada.

      Fn2 - Contra to Fn1 above, Judge of MA banned a book by Kevin Thompson that addressed concern of corruption in the family courts of MA.

      Fn3 - IV-mainliners of various co-dependent rapports for da dough -- who still get paid to hate, discriminate and invigorate ill-will. Many an IV-mainliner often become quite hostile or even aggressive when confronted with concerns. In deed, many of the IV-mainliners address such inquiries with pretty blatant denial.

    • 2 years ago
  • Denica_Cassandra
    • 0
      Denica_Cassandra  

    • This has to be one of the WORST POSTS I HAVE EVER SEEN.

      Sorry, protection for those that are accused of rape isn't the first thing on my mind when I hear of an attack. The tiny amount of people who make up rape charges do not negate the huge and disgusting human rights abuse. If you are indeed a woman, which I doubt, I question your motives. GET REAL

    • 2 years ago
  • cabinettags
  • calm_incense
    • 0
      calm_incense  
    • Denica_test:

      "Sorry, protection for those that are accused of rape isn't the first thing on my mind when I hear of an attack."

      That's exactly the problem.

      Great post, MotherForTruth. As hideous as certain crimes are, it's important not to get carried away and automatically incriminate the accused, under the notion that we're just "doing the right thing".

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • Denica_test:

      so you're saying that its totally fine to punnish and ruin innocent people just because someone out there really is a criminal? so... it would be just fine with you for me to claim rape on you and send you to prison and ruin any chance of future success?

      your responce seems very misandristic. just a thought.

    • 2 years ago
  • kiltedandfree
    • 0
      kiltedandfree  
    • Denica_test:

      It took a strong woman to say what you said, I was going to try, but, one not being a woman, and two, all my experience has been listening to women I dated not by being one of the statistics out there. You said it so much better. I found that every woman I dated from high school thru college and up to my marriage had been raped. An appalling statistic. This article is biased, of course, and it seems to be so easy for some men to demonize women because of some deep hatred toward women. I'd bet every woman who listens to the video will be so angry and hurt by this. I seriously doubt the stats on 50 to 60% falsely accuse men of rape.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • Denica_test:

      kiltedandfree.... you're right, this video is fairly misogynistic but my complaint and commentary is more about the legal bias against men and so by default a legal bias in favor of women. my concern is more about the legal side of this discussion than about the faudulent claims or the women who make them.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  

    • dariusvons, unfortunately this is very common a woman is violent and even hits a man but police arrests the man and DA pursues the charges. This is called Primary Aggressor Doctrine in DV Arrests. Please also educate yourself with VAWA (violence against women act) laws you will be surprised what you learn. A foreign woman can marry an American man, move in to his house then call police and claim domestic abuse. She becomes permanent legal resident and a free house. The duped man can is served with the Protection From Abuse order and can not return to his home.
      The attorney fees can easily run $100k and cases are even $350k. What if this man runs out of money?

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • MotherForTruth:

      thats why we as the people should have a right to compensation when the law is unjust. as it is, there is no accountability for a corrupt legal system.

      I should be compensated for every dollar and every minute of my time. also since I'm representing myself I should be able to be compensated a lawyers pay rate... not to mention the little games the DA plays... they've denied me copies of the evidence being held against me. and refuse to hand over copies of testomonies and police reports... grounds for a mistrial and why they're trying to keep me away from a jury.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • MotherForTruth:

      No I'm no atourney but I'm well aware of my rights and though I'm lacking the proper vocabulary or legal jargon I'm still representing myself. if I could afford a lawyer this all would be much easier... I dropped my public defender because he was trying to get me to settle with a disturbing the peace... I shouldn't be punnished for anything and settleing would just be retarded if I didn't do anything wrong, especially if the states 'victim' is even on my side. so yeah. no public defender, and no lawyer.

    • 2 years ago
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  
    • MotherForTruth:

      In some cases (particularly in close proximity to Boise), beyond "prosecutorial harassment," they might even go a step further into the darkening abyss and threaten you under color of law (e.g., "I'm with the Idaho State Police Department, Capital Security") with possible Criminal Arrest if your voice of the people should ever be so bold as to fate fleeted attempts of Administrative Procedural provisions.

      But, I guess when you walk around with a glass half-full, you become painfully educated from the street regarding an ignorance of our ignorance.

      In deed, humanity likely presents as not only "foul," but perhaps even embarrassingly "dark."

      None the less, here's a toast to any of the others with "glass half-full" and/or who may still believe in the spirit of "free speech" and/or in the benefits of hope, faith and trust in God.

      - justadad

      BTW, in Idaho, if my memory serves me correctly, it may have been a (at least former) S. Ct. Justice ?? Linda Trout (??? name recall??) who helped orchestrate machinery for plunder of needy souls (tarring and feathering parents as pinatas for bashing) to demise of endearing children of their loving rapports. But gee, who are we but simply muffled ignorant voices of people as but sheeples with steeples.

    • 2 years ago
  • pjacobs51
  • MotherForTruth
  • kiltedandfree
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  
    • pjacobs51:

      kiltedandfree,

      Your comment regarding "justice" brought to mind a couple lines from "Epiphany" by Ferrol Sams. In particular, from the first short story, in which a patient of a medical doctor recalls a former discussion with an attorney, to the effect of:

      "Doc, my attorney told me that if you want Justice, go to a whorehouse; if you want to get f#$%&, go to court."

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  

    • in december my recent ex-GF broke into my home and trashed the place. I came home to find her slamming my laptop on the floor and all my books thrown around the room, my gem and crystal collection destroyed and scattered, my houseplants torn apart, the my paintings shredded... I tackled her down and dragged her (kicking punching and screaming) out of my house then I called the cops. they arrested and charged her with breaking and entering, battery, and malicious destruction to property. they also charged ME with battery for draggin her out of my house. most of the charges against her were dismissed in court (only tried for destruction to property), but I'm still fighting this legal battle. even with her testomony saying that I was defending myself and had done nothing wrong,
      the STATE is still insisting on charging me with battery. I've been to court five times and they keep draggin it out to avoid a jury trial because they know the jury will be sympathetic to me, and since her testomony is for and not against me. Idaho sucks, they're trying to make me a crimial but cant put us (me or her) in front of a jury because it will show the states corruption. it's the state that is wrong here, not the 'victim'.

      and regardless of innocence or guilt I'm still forced to spend tons of money and lots of time simply jumping through their hoops. so either way I loose. and for them (cop, judges, prosecutors) its just another day at the office.

      we've definitly got the best justice money can buy.

    • 2 years ago
  • cabinettags
    • 0
      cabinettags  
    • dariusvons:

      Your hang in there darius.. Fire your lawyer and get a public defender. INSIST on a jury trial.

      Be advised you can go the clerk of court and request to be included on the judge's schedule. Tell him/her that all this litigation has bankrupted you and you need to have a public defender assigned. If they refuse, go to your local newspaper.

      You can win this. Idaho or no.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • dariusvons:

      I had a public defender, but I dumped him because he was trying to convince me to plead out. I'm not going to plead guilty to anything. then they assigned me another but I refused him. and yes, I won't settle for anything less than a jury trial. but that's what they're trying to avoid.

    • 2 years ago
  • kiltedandfree
    • 0
      kiltedandfree  
    • dariusvons:

      Just a suggestion, try calling your Congressman, either Senator or House Rep if they aren't corrupt as well. Sometimes they can get things done from the top down. I know how you feel tho, my wife needed to go to court to save her name but do you know how much the attorney wanted up front? $30,000 and that wasn't even the expert witness fee. You have to be independently wealthy to just show up in court. I feel bad for you, cuz I know how corrupt the system can be. Good luck.

    • 2 years ago
  • trut
    • 0
      trut  

    • So a "special agent" for the air force says 60% or more of reported rapes are made up, eh. Well, we all know there is a chain of command in the military that is never broken.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
  • cabinettags
    • 0
      cabinettags  
    • trut:

      well we all know...

      Parrot. Poly wants a cracker.

      I wore my countries uniform for 4 years. Have you? Do you even know what you're talking about? "we all know" is equivalent to "I don't have a clue." Do your research before you make your comments.

    • 2 years ago
  • regjoeschmo
    • 0
      regjoeschmo  
    • trut:

      What the military did was conduct an actual scientific observation into how and why these allegations were happening, and found out that most were false. This is not just "a special agent" who is deciding on some random numbers....

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  

    • I'm going to start making claims that the cops are raping people... lets see what heppens there. I dont think id mind a pergery verdict... somone will go down and I'd take a few pigs with me.

    • 2 years ago
  • Denica_Cassandra
  • kiltedandfree
    • 0
      kiltedandfree  
    • dariusvons:

      We called the police "pigs" back in the 60's and early 70's but most of us realized that policemen and policewomen have very difficult jobs with extremely high stress and have to use incredible restraint and judgement. Pigs don't do that. I'd suggest next time you need police protection for a home invasion break-in stand out on your back porch and yell at the top of your lungs: Suuueeeeeee Pig. See if that helps you.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • dariusvons:

      have you read my running post on this? cops only make things worse... and yeah, if something like that happens again I'm not calling them (supposedly the right thing to do). instead I'm just going to kick that persons ass.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos