HIV-blocking gel for women
source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-08/uou-ahg080709.php
-
-
- CandacePrice
- added this
"Due to cultural and socioeconomic factors, women often are unable to negotiate the use of protection with their partner," says Julie Jay, the study's first author and a University of Utah doctoral candidate in pharmaceutics and pharmaceutical chemistry.
So the researchers developed a vaginal gel that a woman could insert a few hours before sex and "could detect the presence of semen and provide a protective barrier between the vaginal tissue and HIV," Jay says. "We wanted to build a gel that would stop HIV from interacting with vaginal tissue."
Kiser estimates that if all goes well, human tests of the gel would start in three to five years, and the gel would reach the market in several more years. He and Jay want to incorporate an antiviral drug into the gel so it both blocks HIV movement and prevents the virus from replicating."
-
-
dariusvons
-
quixotic12: I mean that SOME people view birth control as a free ticket to play roulette with such things as STDs. sorry but in my mind, yes, sleeping with a ton of different people indescriminatly really IS asking for it. this isn't the 60's anymore, we really have to rethink this whole sexual revolution free love thing, and with mine and future generations being well aware of AIDS there is no reason for it to continue spreading except through our ignorance and flippancy.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
jubal
-
Oh but they would be able to get away with the gel, they could just tell their husbands "oh honey i am so wet and hot for you."
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
xiola
-
jubal:
Good point. :) It would be possible to sneak it, I would think. Can't exactly sneak a condom, can you?
- 2 years ago
-
xiola
-
-
jubal
-
It was also developed for women who because of religion cannot refuse to have sex with their husbands, or insist that they wear a condom.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
dariusvons
-
jubal:
do you really think that these rapacious men who dominate these women as they would allow these women to use any sort of medicine like this? why would they care, when they clearly don't already.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
jubal
-
jubal:
We are talking about Africa. Many of the men work in mines or out in fields. They are with prostitutes during the week and on the weekends they come home to their wives. The wife could go to the clinic that was being run, say by a charity or some community response organization, pick up the gel. Before her husband comes home she could easily, without him even knowing, insert the gel into her vagina. Although the men dominate the woman, they can't be an all seeing eye on them either.
But even better than the gel is the HIV Immunity Vaccine. The woman goes to the clinic to get a shot that makes her HIV immune for 72 hours. This is already a viable treatment and it is being used in the United States already for people who have had an oops (condom broke, accidentally got stuck with a needle, etc). It is an intramuscular injection and uses HIV medications that have been around for a long time and are far beyond their original patent periods.
Again this was kept from the people in Africa because of the reasons they kept the gel away; LICENSE TO FORNICATE.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
Now I agree that people should be more selective of who they bed down with. Getting tested before entering into a serious sexual relationship where your partner wants to have unprotected sex is the best thing to do to eliminate the list of usual suspects of diseases.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
Where did the article talk about sleeping with 50 people per year?
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
xiola
-
jubal:
It didn't.
- 2 years ago
-
xiola
-
-
dariusvons
-
jubal:
what? mine was a comment about easy women and the insane idea that birth control means we're all free to fornicate indesciminately... which some would say is WHY we now worry about things like AIDS, I disagree there, but still think that we (as a culture) should be more selective and prudish when it comes to the people we bed down with.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
xiola
-
jubal:
I totally agree with your comment, insomuch as I do feel people should be selective about who they sleep with, and I find it admirable that you feel that way. But unless I'm missing something here, this is not a form of birth control, it is a gel that inhibits HIV. Also, it was not created with our free-thinking sexual culture in mind, but rather: "This is important – particularly in resource-poor areas of the world like sub-Sahara Africa and south Asia where, in some age groups, as many as 60 percent of women already are infected with HIV. In these places, women often are not empowered to force their partners to wear a condom." Furthermore, the article stated, "Due to cultural and socioeconomic factors, women often are unable to negotiate the use of protection with their partner."
I totally dig what you're saying, it just doesn't really apply in this situation. - 2 years ago
-
xiola
-
-
dariusvons
-
jubal:
ok, yeah sure in places like africa... but really look at it. who in africa will be getting this gell or treatment? not really anyone, with trade embargos, and sanctions we're not allowed to send medicine or technologies to most countries who could benefit from such a thing.. not to mention that most of these women who aren't allowed condoms wouldn't be allowed this gell either. I just think the solution is cultural and scocial, not technological.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
xiola
-
jubal:
You may well have me on that one, friend. I have no idea of the logistics of getting it to those places or if they could. Well put. I hope they can, though, because, like you said, here we have a choice. If some of those women do not have a choice, because maybe men just hate condoms but this gel wouldn't inhibit their pleasure... It sounds like a pretty good idea to me. I mean, wouldn't that be great?
Totally cute doggy, by the way. Thanks for allowing for a nice, rational exchange of ideas. That seems to be harder and harder to do around here. :)
- 2 years ago
-
xiola
-
-
quixotic12
-
jubal:
"mine was a comment about easy women and the insane idea that birth control means we're all free to fornicate indesciminately... which some would say is WHY we now worry about things like AIDS, I disagree there"
If you disagree, then why did you even post about it in the first place? Because the way you posted about it REALLY makes it sound like you support that theory.
- 2 years ago
-
quixotic12
-
-
dariusvons
-
... maybe women should be less promiscuous. maybe it's just me but sleeping with 50 different people in less than a year is asking for it.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
crispyfritters
-
dariusvons:
True, but that doesn't mean the rest of us need to suffer for other people's disregard for everyone's safety.
- 2 years ago
-
crispyfritters
-
-
quixotic12
-
dariusvons:
Sorry, why is it WOMEN that should not be sleeping with 50 people?
I do believe that on continents like Africa it is the MEN who are raping women, and it is the MEN who are refusing to wear condoms.
This isn't about promiscuous women, this is about finding a solution to the cultural and religious barriers that prevent the proper precautions from being taken.
- 2 years ago
-
quixotic12
-
-
jubal
-
This was invented almost 10 years ago, but thanks to the Bush Administration, it was not brought to market for fear that it would give people a license to FORNICATE and to commit SODOMY.
Thanks Bushy and your skewed Christian morals.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
