Fox News and the UK's response to the smear of their healthcare system
source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/deadlineusa/2009/aug/11/nhs-criticism-obama-healthcare
-
-
- bansheewail
- added this
Take a look and tell us what you think: fair criticisms or overstated hype?
Here, Fox News presenter Glenn Beck interviews Tory MEP Daniel Hannan, focusing on the wait times for treatment in the UK.
They reported, you decide: Is this Fox News segment a good representation of the NHS? British cancer specialist Karol Sikora and UK health policy analyst Roy Lilley are among the experts assembled for the segment.
CPR has been producing ads like this one, referenced in the Fox clip above, that criticise Britain's NHS.
Kate Spall, Katie Brickell and Angela French further detail their personal experiences with the NHS in this CPR video. Spall says: "If you have cancer in the UK you are going to die quicker than any other country in Europe." Dr Sikora makes another appearance as well.
French, a cancer patient from Yardley Gobion, talks about the difficulties she had obtaining high-end drugs through the NHS.
-
- tags:
- News, News and Politics, Obama, UK, 6 more
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
The premiums are outrageous and at first the changes may not be perfect but we must start somewhere...
What is wrong with a study of successfully implemented healthcare plans in other countries and implementing the way that will work for our country, http://current.com/items/90678384_health-care-switzerland-compared-to-usa.htm, also Japan implemented a great healthcare system.I am also concerned about currently proposed healthcare plan and I would like to know how can we influence the changes?
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
snaganalf
-
It is very true that the health care system in existence in the US is terrible. HMO's, PPO's dictate what doctors and services you are allowed at present. And it is true the more money you have to throw at them in premiums the better coverage you get. Even then, they are constantly looking for ways not to pay on the policies.
However, I managed to procure a copy of the health care plan, all 1000 and some odd pages of it. What I have been reading in it scares the shit out of me. It needs some really serious work if this is what the government wants to do. Google "health care bill pdf" , leave off the quotes, and get a copy for yourselves. The only way to form an opinion one way or the other is to be informed as best you can. - 2 years ago
-
snaganalf
-
-
Ragan
-
Try this. Medicaid and medicare contract healthcare to HMO's who in turn hire a shithouse full of administrative people who cost a fortune to setup and serve the people. I must admit that I have an HMO and I do have fairly good healthcare but the cost of this mediocre healthcare is ridiculously high. And tey operate like cable tv. It certainly leaves a lot to be improved on. For those seriously sick and need specialists are out of luck and with HMO's you dont have a choice of doctors, only a select few who will accept the fees set forth in their charter. So HMO Doctors do not hae the freedom to charge what the want. If the government had a system whereby the patient had a choice of any doctor and there were no corpoprate HMO's, no Corporate for profit hospitals, no hospital CEO's getting paid outrageous bonuses and everyone were to be paid a decent wage. SIngle payer healthcare and everyone could be happy. Take the corruption and the corporate and the Industry control of everything out of our daily lives and bring some sanity into healthcare and our daily lives and share this sanity with the Government too.
- 2 years ago
-
Ragan
-
-
kennymotown
-
Any system would be better than what we got, pay to stay alive. Sounds like our system is more mafia based protection than health care.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
holyshiite
-
They all have bad teeth.
- 2 years ago
-
holyshiite
-
-
GodsnLiberals
-
here is a little prelude of a working government run healthcare system
"Organizers expected big crowds, in a county with high unemployment and an estimated 22% of working-age adults lacking health insurance.
On Tuesday, the turnout was so large that hundreds had to be turned away.
************
so if you are a tax-payer and need a simple test..you might end up a few heads behind a bunch of people ahead of you who is not paying a fucking dime..
"We're short-handed," said the mobile clinic's founder, Stan Brock. About 100 dentists were needed, but only about 30 showed up Tuesday. Twenty eye doctors were required, but only about five were on hand, Brock said.
The mobile clinic, based in Knoxville, Tenn., has staged 576 medical clinics over the last 25 years. They have treated nearly 380,000 patients and provided care valued at $36.9 million"
- 2 years ago
-
GodsnLiberals
-
-
sunspot01
-
GodsnLiberals:
So for citizens who are too poor or unemployed OR hav e pre-existing conditions that exempt them from any current insurance carriers, you'd rather have people not allowed any service at all. Very kind of you. You sick legal citizens in the US...you don't get any care. Only those with a lot of money, perfect pre-existing health, or a fantastic benefits package through their employer get health care.
Have you ever thought, just once, what it would be like if you lost YOUR job, therefore losing your insurance, and YOU were diagnosed with a long term disability that would cause you to be excluded from every insurance company?
Yes...there would be longer lines for services. Because finally people that were sick could get the help they needed! Excluding the sick because they can't pay or because they are refused coverage is disgusting.
- 2 years ago
-
sunspot01
-
-
ampersand
-
GodsnLiberals:
As usual, GodsnLiberals has his facts wrong. Remote Medical Care is not "a government program" it is a charitable non-profit organization that provides mobile health care to some of the poorest people on the planet--usually, outside the United States. How telling is it that they now are providing services to the desperate poor and working poor of Los Angeles. How revealing it is that GodsnLiberals couldn't even get the facts straight on his own post. One could diagnose GodsnLiberal's medical condition from this symptom.
- 2 years ago
-
ampersand
-
-
nursediesel
-
You know, when you get this new healthcare plan and after it takes at least a decade to get everyone covered. And then after a few years of finding out it is not what you thought it was you'll still blame it's failure on some conservative.
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
It's well known healthcare in US is broken and the argument is really about how to fix it. I think no matter what is the solution the hardworking people will suffer. Those on the top will continue pay top dollar to get the best care somewhere in the world, those who currently have no coverage will be happy if they have something, and the middle class will suffer some more.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
Eleganza
-
Thank you biggranny!
- 2 years ago
-
Eleganza
-
-
biggranny
-
blah blah blah we are beginning to sound like a nation of total assholes. shut the fuck up until you know what you are talkng about please
- 2 years ago
-
biggranny
-
-
GavinTheMother
-
First of all, UK"s healthcare system while having it's problems is rated by WHO to be better than ours.
Secondly, the new American model being proposed currently is not modelled after the UK's healthcare system rendering this gentlemen's assessment valueless to our current debate (if you want to call it that).
Why is the entire argument against Obama's proposal being made by idiots. Will some non-Jackass please make a case?
- 2 years ago
-
GavinTheMother
-
-
bansheewail
-
Obviously, NurseDisinformation didn't go to the link and watch the videos and READ the blog posts from people in the UK about the care they receive. It's much easier to cling to the talking points, I guess. Everything that you are afraid of, "death panels, rationing" and such ALREADY EXISTS in our current Insurance and Big Pharma driven system. Who do you think denies the claims of sick people??? Jesus? Maybe, the tooth fairey?? NO, it's a panel!! This reform will Bill will help fix the very things that you wingnuts are railing against. Inform yourself. Be an American for once.
- 2 years ago
-
bansheewail
-
-
nursediesel
-
bansheewail:
Oh, but I ddi! LOL!
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
Eleganza
-
Why do they always use the UK as an example..why not use the best example, France, for the comparison to our system?
If i were to consider designing a car for instance, I would not use a Ford Pinto as my guide, I would use a Mercedes....get it? If not, PLEASE, just shut up and go suck your thumb. - 2 years ago
-
Eleganza
-
-
neocongo
-
Diesel you're just repeating the same talking point lies Fox and the Insurance Industry have been giving us for years. Lies lies lies and we're sick of them.
- 2 years ago
-
neocongo
-
-
nursediesel
-
neocongo:
You are just buying a bunch of new LIES, LIES, LIES!!
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
nursediesel
-
At birth the life expectancy in the UK is higher than in the USA, but after age 50 the life expectancy is higher in the USA.
Ask a doctor or nurse from the UK why that is? - 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
StandaboveUnderstand
-
nursediesel:
In the US at age 50+ you cant afford not to be insured so you spend your life earnings just to live. Thats why on TV all you see is ads for new pills. Next time dont make insurance cost so much that 1 in 3 cant afford to buy it. Think about what you did you handed over 33% of the vote. And now your scratching your heads saying why would anyone vote for this bill?
- 2 years ago
-
StandaboveUnderstand
-
-
StandaboveUnderstand
-
nursediesel:
Nursediesel you Sir. look like a fool.
- 2 years ago
-
StandaboveUnderstand
-
-
nursediesel
-
nursediesel:
So because healthcare IS affordable in the UK that's what is causing the UK over 50's to die faster? That's what you just said!
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
jubal
-
nursediesel:
That is because of a GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE PROGRAM CALLED MEDICARE, you bozo.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
Theekshani
-
nursediesel:
Since Medicare - which is obviously a government program - is helping elderly Americans live longer, I can't see the harm in offering something similar for the younger generations. Besides, a little bit of preventive medicine goes a long way and no one should have to wait until 50 to receive affordable health care.
- 2 years ago
-
Theekshani
-
-
nursediesel
-
Why do you think people that are dying come here to get treatment before they die.
Why do you think people from NHC countriess come here for excellent and timely treatment.
If you are over 50 in NHC countries and you get sick you are f*cked.
In England there are more NHC administrators than doctors. Must be where the money is........no wonder it takes forever to get care. - 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
couldntfindausername
-
nursediesel:
This makes no sense.
For starters, people flock to the UK, and from the UK, and to and from everywhere else, for treatments and procedures not available from local clinics. Or are you now going to claim that every currenty accepted medical procedure is available from every healthcare facility in the US? No, you're not going to do that because it would be a psychotic claim and you don't appear all that psychotic.
As for over 50 - since the UK has a higher life expectancy than the US, that line of argument is not only incorrect it is blatantly contradicted by reality. It is, in fact, those in the US who suffer.
But hey, run with "US uber alles" if that's what floats your boat.
- 2 years ago
-
couldntfindausername
-
-
div
-
nursediesel:
People don't flock to the US to get *better* treatment, they flock to it to get it faster and more of it because they can pay to do so. It's not like an average income person can just waltz into a hospital in the US and get treatment. You need money to do so no matter where you are in the world. Unless you have the type of system we have in Canada where you can waltz in and get treatment without your checkbook.
- 2 years ago
-
div
-
-
nursediesel
-
nursediesel:
Yeah, people are flocking to the UK.
Maybe as a pit stop on their way to USA.
Let's see senators Byrd, Kennedy, Spector...all went to Uk for care!
We will get government healthcare. I'm sure of it. It will be rammed down our throats 'til we do.
So just you wait and see how fantabulous it shall be for the "free" care! - 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
jubal
-
nursediesel:
Nice one Nurse, where are the proofs to back up your statements? What a Joke I almost fell out of my chair reading that people can't wait to come here to get healthcare. Perhaps millionaires or billionaires might come here, but most of the world lives in poverty, they couldn't afford health care here, let alone the price of the plane ticket.
What people are lining up in droves to do is come here to study medicine and to get licensed to practice medicine so they can join the gouge the Americans party.
There are tons of doctors here from India who have learned to "Milk" the system and commit "fraud" everyday by over charging and double charge and ordering useless and repetitive procedures to rake in more bucks.
I am an accountant and have worked for insurance companies investigating fraudulent claims. I know what the pattern looks like on the computer printouts. It has to do with procedure and diagnosis codes.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
bansheewail
-
And this one....
BenJP
11 Aug 09, 9:55pm (about 16 hours ago)Ignoring the disingenuous misrepresentation of the NHS in the clips, discussions of its merits and the suggestions that something similar will be set up in America are pretty irrelevant, seeing as no such system is being proposed by even the most liberal of Congressmen, they aren't even plans to set up a Canadian-style single payer system, where the government acts as an insurer (there's something like it though), let alone one where the government actually owns the hospitals, employs the doctors etc. Moaning about how many people the NHS employs only acts to highlight the ignorance of many of those on the right in this debate.
- 2 years ago
-
bansheewail
-
-
bansheewail
-
The blog enties from the good (rational)(unpaid) people in the UK are very telling. Check out the link and get it straight from the horses' mouths. here's one I like:
BigB73
11 Aug 09, 10:39pm (about 15 hours ago)
These people are unbloody believable.As for the people complaining the (UK)NHS is shite, they can simply cough up (like they would in America) and buy the drugs they want directly, oh thats right they dont want to do that because a course of cancer drugs runs to tens of thousands a year.
Its my understanding in the states a second trimester scan to check on baby health costs around $600 for the uninsured, on the NHS its free, or rather a massively lower cost through national insurance.
And also if the yanks have such great health provision why do they need flying doctors to run mercy missions to look after the poor / low paid, they are meant to be the wealthiest country in the world but a massive slice of their population rely on charity to survive. DISGUSTING, I'm no commie but for fuck sake these health reform bashers dont deserve what they have, most of these fuggers claim to be religious as well, wheres the compassion.
I tried to watch Fox news for 20 minutes the other day and felt physically sick at being abused by the manipulative, slanted, fabricated stories anyone who cant see through it must truly be as thick as pig shit.
- 2 years ago
-
bansheewail
-
-
mgerlach22
-
bansheewail:
Nothing is free with NHS. If you like the UK's NHS so much, what's stopping you from going there? 75% of Americans are satisfied with their current health care. What happened to majority rules in a democracy?
- 2 years ago
-
mgerlach22
-
-
kivol
-
bansheewail:
75 percent like their doctor and the service they get from the hospital. They are not happy with the price that brings no extra benefit.
Second the take it or leave it motto is lame. Its time we fix the problems are system has.
- 2 years ago
-
kivol
-
-
StandaboveUnderstand
-
bansheewail:
mgerlach22 its funny you say that when 75% dont even have health care. so when 1 in 3 are uninsured that would make it so 66% are insured and and just 75 % of the 66% are satisfied with their current health care. making the real number 49.5 % are satisfied. and 50.5 % are not satisfied so majority rules in a democracy? feel free to check all my math its really not that hard.
- 2 years ago
-
StandaboveUnderstand