Image
xiola
Undercover Baltimore police officer Dante Arthur was doing what he does well, arresting drug dealers, when he approached a group in January. What he didn't know was that one of suspects knew from a previous arrest that Arthur was police. Arthur was shot twice in the face. In the gunfight that ensued, Arthur's partner returned fire and shot one of the suspects, three of whom were later arrested.

In many ways, Dante Arthur was lucky. He lived. Nationwide, a police officer dies on duty nearly every other day. Too often a flag-draped casket is followed by miles of flashing red and blue lights. Even more officers are shot and wounded, too many fighting the war on drugs. The prohibition on drugs leads to unregulated, and often violent, public drug dealing. Perhaps counterintuitively, better police training and bigger guns are not the answer.

When it makes sense to deal drugs in public, a neighborhood becomes home to drug violence. For a low-level drug dealer, working the street means more money and fewer economic risks. If police come, and they will, some young kid will be left holding the bag while the dealer walks around the block. But if the dealer sells inside, one raid, by either police or robbers, can put him out of business for good. Only those virtually immune from arrests (much less imprisonment) -- college students, the wealthy and those who never buy or sell from strangers -- can deal indoors.

Six years ago one of us wrote a column on this page, "Victims of the War on Drugs." It discussed violence, poor community relations, overly aggressive policing and riots. It failed to mention one important harm: the drug war's clear and present danger toward men and women in blue.

Drug users generally aren't violent. Most simply want to be left alone to enjoy their high. It's the corner slinger who terrifies neighbors and invites rivals to attack. Public drug dealing creates an environment where disputes about money or respect are settled with guns.

In high-crime areas, police spend much of their time answering drug-related calls for service, clearing dealers off corners, responding to shootings and homicides, and making lots of drug-related arrests.

One of us (Franklin) was the commanding officer at the police academy when Arthur (as well as Moskos) graduated. We all learned similar lessons. Police officers are taught about the evils of the drug trade and given the knowledge and tools to inflict as much damage as possible upon the people who constitute the drug community. Policymakers tell us to fight this unwinnable war.

Only after years of witnessing the ineffectiveness of drug policies -- and the disproportionate impact the drug war has on young black men -- have we and other police officers begun to question the system.

Cities and states license beer and tobacco sellers to control where, when and to whom drugs are sold. Ending Prohibition saved lives because it took gangsters out of the game. Regulated alcohol doesn't work perfectly, but it works well enough. Prescription drugs are regulated, and while there is a huge problem with abuse, at least a system of distribution involving doctors and pharmacists works without violence and high-volume incarceration. Regulating drugs would work similarly: not a cure-all, but a vast improvement on the status quo.

Legalization would not create a drug free-for-all. In fact, regulation reins in the mess we already have. If prohibition decreased drug use and drug arrests acted as a deterrent, America would not lead the world in illegal drug use and incarceration for drug crimes.

Drug manufacturing and distribution is too dangerous to remain in the hands of unregulated criminals.
Click link to continue...
Image source: http://ulsu.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/war-on-drugs22.jpg
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Current Tonight,   Progressive America,   8 more
  2. tags:
    Drugs Legalization Regulating
  3. recommended by:
    ras_menelik
  4.     
    |

71 comments // It's Time to Legalize Drugs

  • maof4brats
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • There have been dozens, if not hundreds of deaths caused by tasers. You need to get up to date information. Tasers being safe is a myth.

    • 2 years ago
  • AnotherEducatedWhiteGuy
    • 0
      AnotherEducatedWhiteGuy  
    • This is why drugs need to be legalised and guns need to be for the military only. There is no reason cops should be carrying around a gun when we have such fabulous taser technology. No one has ever died from a taser attack anyways.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Image
    • Someone mentioned that the drug cartels profit most from cannabis. Here is a link to an OPed New article about this issue.

      It says that 70% of the profit is derived from Cannabis. Legalizing cannabis would put them out of business and increase revenues in all 50 states, plus increase federal revenues as well; as both the fed and the local state and county and city will tax the hell out of the cannabis.

      Like cigarettes today cost less than $.25 per pack to make, but now sell for close to $6 per pack. The bulk of the increase of $5.75 is taxes.

      The math speaks for itself.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
  • Cochiese
  • Cochiese
  • Cochiese
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • Prohibition of Alcohol is the best example of this situation.

      Basically when alcohol was illegal, people began making it in basements and bathtubs. They sold it illegally and organize crime made a killing off the racket, both financially and figuratively.

      Now the Mexican drug cartels are making US dollars manufacturing, packaging and selling the drugs to distributors. Meanwhile we're only catching the low-level dealers who only deal with maybe one ounce at a time to a few pounds. Someone else will take his place to fill the void. Territorial fights ensue, gang violence over whose turf begins for the right to sell drugs there, etc.

      If you cut the head off this snake by making the drugs legal, not only will you stop wasting police manpower on arresting non-violent criminals, then you will also take the power away from the drug cartels.

      Addiction should be treated as a medical problem anyway. You don't toss a prescription pill addict in jail, you get him into rehab. What's wrong with putting a heroin addict into rehab? It worked for Ray Charles.

      Legalization is the best answer to the War on Drugs.

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • You'd think it'd be best to legalize drugs. But there is an industry keeping them illegal now.

      Drug dogs cost something like $50,000 a drug to train. And something like 60% of everyone in prison today (90% of that for pot) is there because of drugs.

      What are we going to do give the taxpayers their money back and say "nope we don't need it this year we legalized drugs..."???

    • 2 years ago
  • openbrain
  • Prijedor
  • stedylearn1n1
    • 0
      stedylearn1n1  
    • I agree, the funny thing is we all get it, the public knows what drugs are dangerous and should be regulated but the government decides to disburse commercials about marijuana. What a waste of money and time.

    • 2 years ago
  • maof4brats
  • Cochiese
    • 0
      Cochiese  
    • A lot of government jobs will be gone and cops won't have nothing to do. I totally agree with the article its time for a change. Drugs like cocaine, lsd, and meth shouldn't be legal. Marijuana and mushrooms should be and that's it.

    • 2 years ago
  • kryssi51
    • 0
      kryssi51  
    • I don't think drugs should be legalized, per se, but definitely decriminalized because this kind of behavior is outrageous and dangerous for all parties involved.

    • 2 years ago
  • BKsaysAction
    • 0
      BKsaysAction  
    • Wait so some of you are saying you'd rather have people on lsd on the street than alchohol? The reason the death rate for alchohol is so high is because it's wildly open to the public. Now if you throw in all that other stuff besides marijuana, you would have all kinds of death rates going up. You thought it was bad with people having addiction to ciggarettes and booze add cocaine and heroine to that mix and all kinds of family problems will occur. I agree with legalizing marijuana but the rest? Hell no.

    • 2 years ago
  • astrollenium
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • BKsaysAction:

      There are many functional addicts, those addicted to Opiates but continue to work and function normally, go to work, pay their bills, and otherwise act like other citizens, only they do it high on opiates.

      As for Cocaine, in South America the indigenous peoples chew on the leaves of the Coca plant to give them energy and mediate the effects of fatigue and high altitudes. They function with these plants and have relatively few problems compared to alcohol.

      I doubt very much that people who are frying hard on either LSD or Shrooms are going to be driving a car. They might be out for a walk in the woods or at a park trippin on the trees and flowers.

      Making things illegal makes them more desireable and more subject to abuse when people actually do get their hands on them. But the data proves otherwise. Portugal has already legalized all drugs and spends the money they used to use on enforcing anti drug laws to using it to treat people who want to be treated and get off the drugs.

      The crime rate has plummeted, the death rates have plummeted, because now people don't have to risk being robbed and beaten just to score their drugs, they can go to a dispensary that is protected by guards, or some can opt to have the drugs shipped directly to their homes and avoid being in public altogether.

      Just Google Portugal Drug Policy Changes statistics.

    • 2 years ago
  • BKsaysAction
    • 0
      BKsaysAction  
    • BKsaysAction:

      I know there are responsible people that use drugs. Myself included have tried several of the mention above. I also drink and consider myself a responsible drinker. However, I don't trust the general public is what i'm getting at. If we're having trouble already with alcohol abuse, how are we going to deal with the idiots that fry their brains on ecstacy because they use it too much. I think our nation needs a little more responsibility before we can hand over the drug keys. Portugal may be fine but this country has it's major flaws.

    • 2 years ago
  • maof4brats
    • 0
      maof4brats [removed]  
    • I have done my research by living a life of drug use and my liver going bad that is why I have a 215 If you research that it is a medical use card in Cali. i was an addict for years I don't know why I would say that here but I beleive you guys are maybe young and have not gone through what I have and I have researched it alot. I have been a RN since I was young. I know the affects of drugs on the body. Once you need a liver transplant you will know what I am talking about. yes Aclohol is extremely bad for you.

    • 2 years ago
  • astrollenium
  • xiola
  • maof4brats
    • 0
      maof4brats [removed]  
    • Cocaine is already used in a medical situation. But I don't see the need for LSD,there is no medical need for it. It serves no purpose. Cannabis yes LSD heck no.Cocaine is used when people come in for lets say a bloody nose that will not clot and we have to cartarize the nose,we have have them in no medical term snort a little untill they are numb,then we burn the inside of the nose.We have other things if the nose is damaged due to cocaine use.

    • 2 years ago
  • coleslaw
    • 0
      coleslaw  
    • maof4brats:

      Lsd no, but mushrooms yeah.
      Mushrooms you can actually see all sides of the boxes.
      ha. Like shroom before making a big decision.
      if you've tried it you would know exactly what im talkin about ha :D

    • 2 years ago
  • astrollenium
    • 0
      astrollenium  
    • maof4brats:

      maof4brats, if you had done any research, you would have learned that lsd was being used to cure lifelong alcoholics in only one session. So, there actually is a "medical" purpose for it, so to speak.

      Again, you cannot tell people what drugs they can or cannot take, regardless of how destructive they might be. Yes, you can give your opinion, like you have done, but people have the right to kill themselves with alcohol or tobacco, which they do, and the government is happy to collect the taxes from it in the meantime...

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • maof4brats:

      LSD is also useful for depression, as well as psilocybian mushrooms or teónanácatl.

      But we aren't talking for medical use, we are talking about legalizing for recreational use.

      My experience with drugs is that a lot of the drugs out there are polluted or mixed with other harmful substances.

      I agree with the comment that if it comes out of the ground in a natural state, that should not be illegal. Cannabis, Cocaine, Opium and Mushrooms all come from the earth. LSD is synthetic, but useful. Everything else of a pharmaceutical nature can be harmful.

    • 2 years ago
  • unphiltered
    • 0
      unphiltered  
    • Too damn bad that the other 90% of Law Enforcement does not feel the same way.

      We can complain etc, but the reality on the other side is that it takes a different type of personality to be a LEO. Yes, there are plenty of kids who grew up striving to be a lawman, and those may genuinely care about public welfare..... Most however do not. A large portion of LE are corrupt, non-adapting to public need, or plain old school and ignorant. And this overwhelming majority that sees the public as enemies they must defeat to uphold law and get a paycheck, greatly outnumber the just, that care for welfare of communities. Why should it take over a 100 years of drug violenc, illegality, death and utter failure to just start bringing up blogs?

      The other reality- they can preach but, major lobbies fight tooth and nail to keep doing what they are doing. And the people in those lobbies, have money, power and connections. Look at how bad the California Police Chiefs Ass. and Prison Lobby shut down a bill that would have funded rehab and removed non-violent drug offenders from overcrowded Cali penal system......ehh..too bad, they didnt want it so they defeat it.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
  • hunzedog
  • hunzedog
  • RojoGatto
  • hombre76
  • fdsooner
  • N_Dank
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • If it grows from the ground it should be legal. BAYER made Heroin trying to synthesise Opium. Keep drug companies out of it and plants are safer than FDA approved drugs ! . its a fact

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I would legalize cannabis, cocaine, mushrooms, LSD and opium. These could be regulated easily. I would most definitely not legalize Meth, under any circumstances. All the resources now being dedicated to the aforementioned drugs, should be shifted to Meth. And other things like Special K or Ketamine and PCP, are already controlled substances, so whatever black market there is on these substances should be the focus of the drug war.

      But the aforementioned drugs can all be justified for various reasons, including religious and spiritual. But Meth is by far the worst of all drugs in its ability to quickly destroy an individual and an entire family.

    • 2 years ago
  • resolute
    • 0
      resolute  
    • jubal:

      Hey, I don't agree. The other listed five drugs will destroy an individual and a family eventually. A drug is a drug.
      Definition:A chemical or substance, not necessarily for medical purposes, which alters the way the mind or body works.
      Society can hardly 'work' correctly as it is, let alone adding more people with altered body and mind functions.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • jubal:

      A drug is a drug you say? Well Alcohol and cigarettes are drugs and they are legal and they destroy more lives than the other five you are objecting to combined.

      What say you about Alcohol and cigarettes?

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • jubal:

      meth is legal go see your local pill pushing doctor and tell hem you can't consintrate and he will more than likely give you a script for speed under a diffrent name of corse Like addrilol or atavan

    • 2 years ago
  • resolute
    • 0
      resolute  
    • jubal:

      Yes, alcohol is a drug for it alters the mind/body. Cigarettes also contain a drug which alters the mind. And for the love of money they are legal.

      Seems like that is the excuse to legalize the other substances. We should be going in the other direction.

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • I smoke weed I will tell any body I smoke weed it is a naturle herb any thing man made is a controled substance that should be kept that way. Free the herb that heals. There is no place that crack or cocane is safe Herion is just as bad as the pills the give out and Meth just rots the brain. Yea I know I did not use proper punctuaion I'm still working on the spelling part Best of luck in your world

    • 2 years ago
  • SHAWN_RITTIMAN
  • danitassin
    • 0
      danitassin  
    • if the government taxed it like cigarettes it would pay off the national debt in ten years. however if they did that there are many many people who would'nt be able to pay there bills anymore. we cant please everyone all at the same time, it's going to be a constant battle.
      either way i'd trust a pot head way before i'd trust a drunk or crack head. which would you want as your neighbor?

    • 2 years ago
  • T5vZZ
    • 0
      T5vZZ  
    • a weird thought i had similar to this (probably during some experimentation with recreational marijuana use), involved the persons licensed to sell the wider range of drugs being regulated heavily..in place of the customer profiling that would definitely take place if this plan was instituted. cops trolling the establishments, undercutting any investigative techniques, was the first thing that came to mind reading this proposal. but owners and staff could proudly take the heat and political scrutiny with their personal drug testing and moderation of sales to habitual buyers. a sort of encompassing of both extremes, of those with substance abuse problems interacting at the apex of use/transaction with regimented sub-culture of the sobriety enabled. the sub-culture perhaps rising out of the legislative trailblazing. or at least the opportunity to bring the ailment in to the light of day for everyone to confront. it could even be considered that off duty cops(or cops that are up for review and need brownie points) could earn extra income and experience serving behind the registers - heading off any on-duty profiling with awkward retailer responsibility. but with the range of substances sold, i think theres a risk of mixing social work with sales. a high amount of oversight would be inevitable in some form. a positive that might arise - a replacement by drug scoring of the exhaustive process most associate now with the DMV.

    • 2 years ago
  • interditx
  • irtehjoe
    • 0
      irtehjoe  
    • It's silly that it takes a cop getting shot in the face a few times for him to think weed should be legal.

      and who wants to drink bootleg booze when the stuff you get at the store tastes so gooood

    • 2 years ago
  • maof4brats
    • 0
      maof4brats [removed]  
    • I don't think allowing all drugs to be legal is not the way to go. Cannabis yes but cocaine and others no thank you. I have seen to many people come in OD. i not seen that with cannabis but coke and H I have seen many familys destroyed because of that stuff.

      EDIT: I have seen my own family be distroyed by alcohol and drugs LSD WAS used meaning past tence we other things for alcohol abuse that are not as addicting. I have done acid in the way past and I know what it does,so I am not ignorant. I just think lets try to get canabis legalize before we go and get other more addictive stuff legalized. if we as pot users go and say hey what about coke,LSD and what not you are just demeaning the ones that just want to use pot for medical use. Sorry but I am saying this as an RN.

    • 2 years ago
  • xiola
    • 0
      xiola  
    • maof4brats:

      You make a very good point. But I must ask, haven't you seen families destroyed due to alcohol? I'm sure you've seen many cases of alcohol poisoning. I'm curious, do you think alcohol should be illegal?

    • 2 years ago
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • maof4brats:

      I hesitated to comment, cause I don't really agree with legalizing all drugs. I think it takes away from the cannabis hemp issue.

      Deep in my heart I can stand up and tell people cannabis hemp should not be a crime. I can answer with facts. I can't really do that for all drugs. I don't want to generate more problems for families. All drugs is too far for ordinary Americans to grasp. I think people are willing to talk about reclassifying cannabis hemp. All drugs? Not me.

    • 2 years ago
  • astrollenium
    • 0
      astrollenium  
    • maof4brats:

      maof4brats, like xiola asked, do you think alcohol should be made illegal? Clearly, more people have died as a result from "overdosing" on alcohol than cocaine or heroin, so I guess it should made illegal right?

      This is actually a civil rights issue. People should not be told what drugs they can or cannot take, whether it's cocaine, heroin, lsd, whatever. But people still do these drugs, regardless of their illegality or potential harm, even legal drugs, like alcohol and tobacco.

    • 2 years ago
  • mr_tibbles
    • 0
      mr_tibbles  
    • maof4brats:

      I agree with maof4brats. You can't make your argument by using the fact that alcohol has contributed to more overdoses than cocaine or heroin as alcohol is much more easy to obtain and is more widely used. So of course more people will overdose on alcohol. Also, alcohol is not nearly as addicting as cocaine or heroin and it's foolish to even attempt to compare them. Stick with legalizing cannabis and then go from there.

    • 2 years ago
  • astrollenium
    • 0
      astrollenium  
    • maof4brats:

      OK let's say cannabis gets legalized. What's to stop the mexican drug lords to just start planting opium or coca plants in the national parks instead? If they can't make money off weed anymore, they will move on to others drugs, won't they?

    • 2 years ago
  • maof4brats
  • SHAWN_RITTIMAN
  • astrollenium
    • 0
      astrollenium  
    • maof4brats:

      From what I have read, marijuana sales account for the majority of the cartels profits, not hard drugs. So if weed were to become legalized, the cartels would lose major profits but probably just move on to try and sell other illegal drugs. So yes this is definitely a good thing, but then people would start asking for opium plants to become legal, etc. Granted, it would be a small minority, but over time, I am sure it would increase bit by bit, just as the cannabis legalization effort has increased over time. By the way, I am pro-legalization, I just like playing devil's advocate ;)

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Image
    • maof4brats:

      What exactly is it you think is going to happen if all drugs are legalized? You mentioned that the drug cartels would start planting coca plants and opium plants in our national forests. that is ludicrous because coca plants aren't going to grow there, they are indigenous to South America and particularly the high mountainous regions near the equator.

      As for opium plants, they are called poppies. These plants are grown for flowers all over the west coast of North America. But the cultivation for opium is another process entirely. It is not an easy plant to harvest the opium from because its very labor intensive. The pods have to be gouged with a sharp object to create a line wherein the juice of the plant excretes and turns into a black tar substance on the outside of the see pod, then the black tar substance is scraped off and amassed to be made into opium.

    • 2 years ago
  • partyrager
    • 0
      partyrager  
    • Very good point about the difference between street dealers and indoor dealers. I didn't realize I was so far removed from the outdoor part of society. I had not thought of the motivation to conduct business in the open like that would be to minimize loss. I figured it was to serve the influx of strangers...probably both reasons and more.

    • 2 years ago
  • WakeUpPeople
    • 0
      WakeUpPeople  
    • Illegalizing a substance does not put it in less demand. Because the free market cannot offer the substance, the criminal element gladly takes the profits on the black market. This empowers them, emboldens them, and enriches them. So, the question reveals itself... why do we uphold the system that supports violence and criminals? We certainly can't count on individuals to stop buying the products, so the only other option is to LEGALIZE and REGULATE these substances in the same way we regulate tobacco and alcohol. The free market will eliminate the need for drug cartels. The economy will improve and industries will be created. People will feel less oppressed because their govt isn't telling them what they can or cannot put in their adult bodies. Prohibition is not the answer; it is the problem.

    • 2 years ago
  • akamaial
    • 0
      akamaial [removed]  
    • Prohibition does not or has not worked, and after these past scores of years it is so glaringly obvious that it is downright laughable.
      Why the continued denial by our government of the need for legal and regulatory controls, is beyond any comprehensible reason in my opinion.

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • The government has to stop trying to protect us from ourselves by making substanses illegal. By doing that they lead desperate people right to desperate criminals selling the substanses people in pain are looking for.
      So as this story indicates outlawing drugs hurts those the government seeks to protect, plus those that are forced to protect the citizens from harm because of outlawing drugs.
      Without the drug laws we'd have helped eliminate outlaws selling drugs to users.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I think this article is very well thought out and well executed. Thank you xiola for posting it and I agree with everything contained in it. I agree with the police officers who want to end the war on drugs and use their resources to combat other crimes.

    • 2 years ago
  • xiola
  • pjacobs51
    • 0
      pjacobs51  
    • Great post!

      Some places are relaxing the laws a bit, like Columbia, MO. A big collage town, the home of MU. Too many smart kids loosing their full ride scholarships worth thousands of dollars because police maybe found a roach in their car. So they voted on legalization up to an once. You can't buy it or sell it, but you can possess it.

    • 2 years ago
  • xiola
    • 0
      xiola  
    • pjacobs51:

      You can't buy it, or sell it, but you can possess it? Sound like we have a bunch of marijuana growers on our hands, yes? It makes sense that they would change the law, but that doesn't always mean change happens. That's awesome. :)

    • 2 years ago
  • jayrye
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • This is all too true, also a common victim of drug violence is the innocent bystander who gets caught in a cross-fire between police and drug dealers, or even rival drug dealers.

      The violence and destructive behaviors tied to drug dealing would stop with legalization, since all one would need to do to get them is go to the store.

      I think that harder drugs need more regulation and should not be sold in stores. Drugs like Marijuana however should be regulated like beer and sold to those above the age of 21.

    • 2 years ago
  • GodsnLiberals
  • xiola
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Prohibition of Alcohol is the best example of this situation.

      Basically when alcohol was illegal, people began making it in basements and bathtubs. They sold it illegally and organize crime made a killing off the racket, both financially and figuratively.

      Now the Mexican drug cartels are making US dollars manufacturing, packaging and selling the drugs to distributors. Meanwhile we're only catching the low-level dealers who only deal with maybe one ounce at a time to a few pounds. Someone else will take his place to fill the void. Territorial fights ensue, gang violence over whose turf begins for the right to sell drugs there, etc.

      If you cut the head off this snake by making the drugs legal, not only will you stop wasting police manpower on arresting non-violent criminals, then you will also take the power away from the drug cartels.

      Addiction should be treated as a medical problem anyway. You don't toss a prescription pill addict in jail, you get him into rehab. What's wrong with putting a heroin addict into rehab? It worked for Ray Charles.

      Legalization is the best answer to the War on Drugs.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos