American commander: US on the road out of Iraq
source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_IRAQ_MOVING_OUT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFA...
-
-
- xiola
- added this
The massive operation already under way a year ahead of the Aug. 31, 2010 deadline to remove all U.S. combat troops from Iraq shows the U.S. military has picked up the pace of a planned exit from Iraq that could cost billions.
The goal is to withdraw tens of thousands of troops and about 60 percent of equipment out of Iraq by the end of next March, Brig. Gen. Heidi Brown, a deputy commander charged with overseeing the withdrawal, told The Associated Press in one of the first detailed accounts of how the U.S. military plans to leave Iraq.
Convoys carrying everything from armored trucks to radios have been rolling near daily through southern Iraq to Kuwait and the western desert to Jordan since President Barack Obama announced the deadline to remove combat troops, leaving up to 50,000 troops under a U.S.-Iraqi security agreement until the end of 2011.
First out, Brown said, will be the early withdrawal of an Army combat brigade of about 5,000. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said a brigade would leave by the end of the year, months ahead of schedule, if violence in Iraq did not escalate beyond current levels.
That will be followed by the Marine Corps, which has already shipped out about half of its 22,000 troops and more than 50 percent of its equipment since May.
"In about six months or less, they will be gone," she said.
The U.S. military also plans to shrink the contractor force from roughly 130,000 to between 50,000 and 75,000 by September 2010. Those remaining would pick up additional duties from departing troops, Brown said.
The nearly 300 American bases and outposts currently remaining in Iraq will shrink to 50 or less by the president's deadline, Brown said.
The Al Faw Palace in Baghdad, which serves as the U.S. military headquarters, is among U.S. operations expected to be turned over to the Iraqis, she said.
The price tag to move the American force has not been fully calculated by the Pentagon because it was not immediately clear how much equipment would be returned to the United States, donated to the Iraqis or shipped to Afghanistan, according to officials.
However, the independent Government Accountability Office reported to Congress earlier this year that the withdrawal would be a "massive and expensive effort" that would likely increase war costs by billions. It also estimated an additional $12 billion to $13 billion a year would be needed for two years following the withdrawal for maintenance, repairs and replacement of equipment returned from Iraq.
Not since Vietnam has the U.S. withdrawn so many troops and so much equipment with a looming deadline.
The military anticipates keeping the majority of its 130,000 combat troops currently in Iraq until nearly two months after the Jan. 16 national elections, then rapidly drawing down troops and equipment in the weeks that follow.
"We would stay steady with troop strength until after the election plus 60 days," Brown said. "You don't know who will win the government and how long it will take to seat the government."
The plan was based on orders by Gen. Raymond Odierno - the top commander in Iraq who used a similar approach following this year's provincial elections. Odierno waited 60 days after balloting to make decisions about future movement, and shifting American soldiers south to Basra to replace the departing Brits.
Brown said the phased withdrawal of troops and equipment could be halted at any time, if, for example, the Iraqi government asks U.S. troops to stay longer due to a resurgence in violence.
One of the biggest challenges is moving the millions of tons of equipment.
Click link for more...
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, US Politics, World News, 7 more
-
-
fun_size
-
Im glad to hear our troops are well on their way out of that sand trap. I cant believe how long its taken to say that...
- 2 years ago
-
fun_size
-
-
samthesixth
-
Pull out now!
- 2 years ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
fun_size
-
samthesixth:
They are. You cant exactly move several hundred thousands troops and millions of tons of supplies out in a day... Well not unless you want our troops to become the biggest target in the world.
- 2 years ago
-
fun_size
-
-
stopnoise
-
It is about time!
- 2 years ago
-
stopnoise
-
-
MilchMann
-
Good story!
To all of the persons thus far commenting... why bother with your uneducated diatribe? None of you from either position understand a thing about what has or is happening... good job, keep up the good fight.
- 2 years ago
-
MilchMann
-
-
JanforGore
-
Yeah, they need more troops in Afghanistan as it is said the war is spreading up North and troops are spread thin. So I take this with a grain of salt. We will always have a presence in Iraq. When they put the For Sale sign up on their spa embassy in Baghdad and start moving all personnel, contractors, and corproations ( and give the farmers back their seeds) out as well, then I will believe this. Until then, it's just more PR.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
About f**king time ! Can these soldiers get a break ?
- 2 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
AlGores_Uncle
-
With populations so big....its gonna get way worse. Just wait for the water wars.
- 2 years ago
-
AlGores_Uncle
-
-
MinneapolisMafia
-
An unconstitutional UN sanctioned war? The Military Commissions Act? The patriot Act? The Dept. Of Homeland (in)security?? Bush, Cheney and Rummy and Obama are all the same war scum that need to be shipped out to the midsts of the Iraq desert along with anyone that supports them and these horrible wars on drugs and terror.
- 2 years ago
-
MinneapolisMafia
-
-
Bldng4Jstc
-
MinneapolisMafia:
The Iraqi war was not sanctioned by the UN and most security council members believed any action was illegal.
- 2 years ago
-
Bldng4Jstc
-
-
s0uthc0ast
-
Thanks to Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld for making the difficult decisions which have lead to victory.
I am sure 0bama will make this mention during the victory lap.
Cripes, this dope is like the marathon runner who comes into the race a mile from the finish and cannot believe what a grueling race it was. - 2 years ago
-
s0uthc0ast
-
-
newamerica2012
-
lol The US military, our CIA and their illegal death squads from Blackwater(Xe Services) will never leave the middle-east. The Iraq "withdrawal" will be halted on some level, and don't forget about the military bases and US troops that will be stationed there for eternity just like we have in Korea. Who knows what's going to happen in Afghanistan, they're now saying the same things there that we said in Iraq "We need to change our strategy." lol And who's next? We have both liberal and conservative idiots who want to send aid and troops to all kinds of places. When is this nonsense we can't afford going to end? Obama has yet to even attempt talks with Iran, so this leads me to believe he'll just put this off like the Iraq withdrawal until after the 2010 elections. Politics as usual! When will the intelligent minority(third party) become the majority?
- 2 years ago
-
newamerica2012
-
-
MinneapolisMafia
-
Our base will stay there and 'security' forces will stay there. And we will be in Pakistan and Afghanistan killing people. So this is NOTHING! Obama is just another war criminal.
- 2 years ago
-
MinneapolisMafia
-
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
-
-
Ares
-
Einsam_Data_Old:
I must have missed the part in the enlistment contract where they say you bake cookies all day...
- 2 years ago
-
Ares
-
-
AlGores_Uncle
-
Since when was Iraq stable? Since when was anyone proud of Iraq? Of everyone I especially don't think Obama is trying to take credit for anything. It is a shameful disgusting war, the American people were dooped and manipulated by their emotions so they did not fight the creation of a war that made no sense, one not based on reality.
- 2 years ago
-
AlGores_Uncle
-
-
jp23
-
AlGores_Uncle:
There's no doubt the war was a shameful mistake. I agree with you, well said!
- 2 years ago
-
jp23
-
-
Ares
-
AlGores_Uncle:
Indeed. Genocide in Rwanda is an atrocity, but it's OK for Saddam to do it because, really, who cares about the middle east. You're right, we should have stayed out.
- 2 years ago
-
Ares
-
-
Ares
-
I look forward to Obama heralding the great strides the Iraqi people are making since the deposition of Saddam, and all of you dumbasses kissing his ass for putting an end to something he didn't start, yet still taking credit for stabilizing an entire nation.
Oh and let's not forget we're still in Afghanistan.
- 2 years ago
-
Ares
-
-
jh64487
-
hey um...this is all obama.
mccain and any other conservative would have made it another US outpost.
sorry for making that partisan.
- 2 years ago
-
jh64487
-
-
afloyd60
-
jh64487:
from the article: "...leaving up to 50,000 troops under a U.S.-Iraqi security agreement until the end of 2011."
hmmm, imagine that. i guess these are the non-combat type of troops as well. whatever that means.
any other conservative??? firstly, mccain is not a conservative and neither are most of the punks that call themselves conservatives. they are neocons. secondly, what about this guy, a real conservative?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX-DIpkJRDY&feature=player_embeddedit does not matter what party is in power. they are two sides of the same coin these days. there is no real difference. war is profitable and advantageous to either party. the false left/right paradigm is a sham.
- 2 years ago
-
afloyd60
-
-
ryan8566
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ryan8566
-
-
Ares
-
ryan8566:
Right. They never found anything, anything at all.
- 2 years ago
-
Ares
-
-
abehammy
-
FINALLY!
- 2 years ago
-
abehammy
