Community | September 02, 2009 | 120 comments

John Stossel Exposes Michael Moore’s Movie SICKO - Debunks Cuba’s Government Healthcare

Image
shanklinmike
John Stossel Takes On The United Nations (UN) statistics that are retrieved from Cuba’s government and dissects Michael Moore’s film Sicko.

***This article has been chosen as a discussion topic on PFP Movement Radio, http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pfpmovementradio Friday night at 6pm-8pm. Please Call In To The Show, 347-633-9636. COMMENTS will be included in the show so feel free to discuss or ask questions here on current.com as they will be addressed during the show. This article will also air on Freedom Hour Saturday at 9pm-10pm on Movement TV http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?page_id=36***
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   Opinion,   Movie News
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Politics Current TV 9 more
  3.     
    |

120 comments // John Stossel Exposes Michael Moore’s Movie SICKO - Debunks Cuba’s Government Healthcare

  • samthesixth
    • 0
      samthesixth  
    • All of you who think Stossel is a sell out because he is aligned with certain groups, must be forgetting that he works for ABC. Remember ABC? They are the ones who did a primetime infomercial on health care from the White House.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
  • J_Jammer
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Image
    • jubal:

      There you go again Jammer, being oppositional with me.

      Do you know what Yellow Journalism is? My degree is in Media and I have had a slew of classes that dealt with what this is and the body of Media law that accompanies it.

      I think I am qualified to describe yellow journalism when I see it.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • jubal:

      Just because you have a degree doesn't mean you are right.

      You have to have what is called...PROOF. You don't.

      I could have a degree in reading people and you'd scoff at that.....consider us even.

    • 2 years ago
  • trut
  • J_Jammer
  • trut
    • 0
      trut  
    • I live in Canada, most people I know only go to the doctor when they have to. No line ups around the block or long waiting times, whatsoever. Stossel must be being paid to repeat the same old lies and fabrications. I know noone who has left the country for any medical reasons. People who did leave were probably just going on holiday, besides when Canadians get treated in other countries the Gov't pays their bills anyway.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • trut
    • 0
      trut  
    • trut:

      What are you talking about? Where are the long lines you speak of? I have never seen them. The lotteries help finance the healthcare system, is there anything wrong with that?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • trut:

      Didn't watch the entire video, one.

      Two, you sound just like an American who thinks the health care is perfect. You'd scoff if they said that. Well people scoff at your comment that there are not lines and waits for months for certain procedures. Or HOUR....least being 3 and most being the day for help.

      The moment you can actually be honest about the health care system is the moment I can actually take you seriously.

    • 2 years ago
  • trut
    • 0
      trut  
    • trut:

      You are right J, I only watched part of the video. I am from Canada though and the healthcare system here is run by the provinces(states) not by the federal gov't. Certain procedures do have waiting times but so do procedures in the states. I pay $50 a month for full coverage, everything, I know noone who has ever been denied coverage for anything, unlike the American system where the insurance companies charge $500 a month and look for any reason whatsoever to deny coverage. We have no co-pay, none.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • trut:

      Waiting hours, days or even months is like being denied. Some people have had bad experience with such. Acting like it's better instead of something that's just as bad but in a pretty package is not being truthful.

    • 2 years ago
  • hugoboss
    • 0
      hugoboss  
    • I like John Stossel (in the past). I have enjoyed many of his reports over the years. But this time around about health care -- I think he is deadly wrong and starting to wonder if he is being paid by the insurance companies under the table. I have lived in both Australia & Canada, and also have relatives live in both of these countries. Their public health care (systems) there are many times better than our very embarrassing system here in America. No they DO NOT have to wait 6-month long to see a doctor or for special treatment. In fact they get excellent services there. This is just another scary tactics the health insurance companies are using. These profit-driven insurance companies are in fear of the end of their existence, if the debating current health / insurance reform is pass. I am very disappointed in John Stossel. How much did these companies pay you John?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • hugoboss:

      You did not address anything that they stated about Canada. NOTHING. What about the wait time? The lotto for a family doctor?

      Not admitting to to fractures in a system is stating that it's without fault.

      Disappoint in someone for not being truthful and yet you are not truthful yourself? Not a well played hand and rather cliched with the "fear" talk.

    • 2 years ago
  • hugoboss
    • 0
      hugoboss  
    • hugoboss:

      Have you ever been to or lived in Canada?
      Where did you get these bogus facts?

      My relative, who is currently has cancer, is being treated and getting excellent services there, and yes he does not have to "wait" for his turn to be treated.
      If you ever at this stage (having cancer), believe me, the last thing that you ever want to deal with when you on the hospital bed is to be dealing with insurance companies or medical bills, and to be worry what is being covered and what is not. Our relative was in the hospital for 4-5 weeks, and when he was out, he did not have to worry about any hospital bills. In fact he did not have to pay not even one penny. Their income taxes are a little higher than ours, but at least you get something beneficial in return. Here in the U.S., if you stay in the hospital for that long, even with insurance, you can be broke by the time you are out.

      I have lived in Australia and Canada myself for many years, and have personally witnessed how their health care systems work. All of my relatives from both of these two countries have come to visit the U.S. many times for vacation, but they would never want to live here or dare to move here -- all because of the fear of the health care system in the U.S.

      You should go and spend a year there vacationing and find out for yourself. It is the BEST WAY to discover the TRUTH.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • hugoboss:

      There are always downsides and it's unnecessary to trade one system for another if the downsides are worse. The packaging, as you continue to discribe it, can be as pretty as it wants...but it's what's inside that counts and I don't think ou know enough about it to know the darker aspects.

      America knows it has a problem, but the dispute is how to solve it not that it needs solved.

    • 2 years ago
  • slarabee
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • slarabee:

      But you work for your political views that are controlled by the party you think you are with.....ie Obama, right? You voted for him....yes? How often have you discussed what he has done wrong here?

      If no...then you are controlled. If yes it would matter what you have talked about because it can still sound a bit controlled.

      Plus people are accusing someone of being with someone without having his response. They are not really trustworthy in their accusations anyway---so it's not like you or anyone else have valid backing and his comments on such...so your proof is pretty hollow.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • slarabee:

      Doesn't in any way make what is said in any of the videos wrong.

      Stating that it does is ignorance in it's greatest glory.

      And your thinking didn't come from your own head. It comes from somewhere....you teach your children you were taught as well.

      You are not untouched.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • slarabee:

      Simply put you disagree with him because he disagrees with what Obama wants.

      Don't over complicate it with pretend reasons. It's see through.

      Why do liberals and democrats think that no one wants to alter health care but them? Fear tactic to get what they want out of this. It does need to be changed...it does NOT need to be overhauled in such a way that it's like any other countries.

      That's just retarded.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • slarabee:

      You didn't watch the video. It shows that he wants affordable and reasonable health care as well.

      You just don't like him and as I stated that's just not good enough---even though you continue to pretend it's for a valid reason.

      It's just like people not liking Obama because he's not white. You not liking someone because they don't think like you is no different. It affords the same amount of thinking.

      And I didn't call you anything, but it does make it easier to code everything in what you wish it to be so that you feel justified in what you have to say and think.

      Do as you wish...but you're really wrong and I think you realize that and that's why you must depart.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • slarabee:

      I don't lose respect so easily because humans make mistakes, you do know that don't you?

      I don't...it seems that you think you are flawless and never made one and if you come back and state that you are not---then why are you so nitpicky about how others act and how do we know that you hold yourself to such high standards? Don't fall from your standards....you just might die.

      I don't look at someone's reputation to see if I agree with them. What they have to state and how they state it is what I look at. If I totally paid attention to every little thing they did or who they talked to then I wouldn't like anyone.....because no one would live up to that kind of scrutiny.

      And Dan Rather was set up...that is one of the suggestions. What am I supposed to do? Believe you that you state he was ruined by his own mistake that he never did in all his career? Or that someone wanted to ruin him?

      Which fits?

      I don't know. I do know that I don't judge him on that. It's a waste of time to judge people before they speak.

    • 2 years ago
  • rmann0581
    • 0
      rmann0581  
    • Congress, the vice president, and the president should be required to follow whatever healthcare reform they pass. If government healthcare is good enough for a regular person, it's good enough for congress.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • j_jammer- Who do you think you are assuming me or anyone else hasn't been reading and watching? Never mind I think I know the answer to that question. It's none of your business but I've read every post How much have I've paid in premiums? Not enough to have good coverage. I'm disabled and haven't had the income for it most of my life. I'm of retirement age and on Social Security so Medicare paid most of my bill which with doctors and everything came to about $47,000. I was able to get decent care because of a government health care program.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Ever been to New York City?

      They have tollways on bridges. The only one (I believe) that is free is the George Washington and guess which one has the most traffic? The George Washington. So much traffic it sometimes takes people an HOUR or more to get across. People walking get across in half time.

      People on tollways are paying to spend less time on the road and get to where they are going at a good pace. The tollways are normally free of clutter.

      I would rather pay money than wait. Waiting costs money too...you could be doing so much instead of waiting.

      I could be making money instead of waiting 6 hours for what? I'd rather pay.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • Pay out of pocket for health care? After having a stroke and having a blood clot removed my hospital bill alone was $32,000. I didn't have that much in my pocket. This incident explains the whole concept of health insurance. It's necessary and everyone needs it.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • sespian
    • 0
      sespian  
    • wayseeker:

      @ wayseeker: While I'm sincerely saddened at the thought of you or anyone else going through a life threatening and traumatic event of having a stroke, the mere fact that you did indicates that you are a meat and dairy consumer. Vegans simply don't have this type of medical problem. My point being that if people want the freedom of consuming meat and dairy in this country, then they should take personal responsibility for the resulting medical conditions that arise from their choices.

      For example, consider the number of obese in this country today (and the number continues to rise at a record pace), this condition alone is guaranteed to create unnecessary expense for whatever socialist health care program that is put in place by our government. As long as people have the right to be obese, consume excessive amounts of alcohol, smoke, have unprotected sex, etc., government provided health care cannot be a right.

      Let me be clear, I gladly support charitable organizations that help victims cover their medical costs, such as http://www.childrenmedical.org/index.html. But if individuals want to consume whatever and do whatever they please in this country, then let them pony up the money to pay for the consequences. If people don't want to be judged for their reckless decisions -fine, I get it- I'll stay out of your personal decisions as long as your personal choices stay out of my pocket!

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • wayseeker:

      Another person making assumptions you have no right to make. Diabetes and heart conditions seem to run in my family. I suggest you hold off on your judgments until you know what you're talking about.

    • 2 years ago
  • sespian
    • 0
      sespian  
    • wayseeker:

      I have done the research. I suggest you do some research instead of a knee-jerk defensive response. You didn't look into my claim at all, but defensively ignored the information I shared with you. Furthermore, it is typical to have diabetes and heart disease run in a family due to traditional and customary dietary habits passed down from generation to generation. We just like to think that things aren't are fault, they just happen, there is nothing we could possibly do to prevent them, which is wrong when it comes to poor diet.

      I'm not trying to pick on you wayseeker, but before you ignore what I'm saying simply because you don't like what I say, perhaps you could do some sincere research yourself. I'd be happy to provide you legitimate third-party resources.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • wayseeker:

      My response is not a knee jerk reaction. I obviously haven't done the degree of research you have on diets but I'm educated and not stupid. It sounds like you're saying if the world would change it's diet to vegetarian we would wipe out heart disease, strokes, and diabetes? How about cancer and 100's of other diseases? Vegetables are undoubtedly the healthiest food to eat but I don't think eating them along with meat and dairy products causes all or most diseases as you seem to be indicating. Just a thought: Human beings are naturally carnivorous.

    • 2 years ago
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • Michael Moore's point in going to Cuba (as as already been mentioned, but deserves repeating) is that the 9/11 rescue workers were DENIED HEALTHCARE here in the US.

      DENIED HEALTHCARE!

      Uh.....how do we explain how our system is "perfect" and account for why 9/11 rescue workers were DENIED HEALTHCARE?

      What about the woman that was on 12 different medications here in the US but went to a doctor in CUBA and was taken off 6 of them?

      Do ya think PROFIT was a motive in assigning 6 additional and unnecessary medications?

      I think that was the broader point Mr. Moore was making.....and a point that none of his critics wants to address directly.

      Instead of explaining why 9/11 rescue workers were DENIED HEALTHCARE they instead claim that Mr. Moore is a "liar."

      Did he lie about the 9/11 workers being DENIED HEALTHCARE here in the US?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
  • maizein
    • 0
      maizein  
    • Cuba has the best overall health care system in Latin America.

      Don't forget it's a poor country. It should not be compared to Europe/North America standards, even though, in the case of the US, the Cuban system is probably better for the average citizen.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • j-jammer - To keep insisting that you are the only one who understands the video because you're the only one that watched it is talking down to the rest of us and is arrogant of you. It's pointless to discuss an issue with someone who claims their understanding of the information is exclusive to themselves.

    • 2 years ago
  • livejelly
    • 0
      livejelly  
    • Here is a nifty idea.

      if what we have is not working out go back to square 1.
      medicine-hospitals are to help people get better when they get sick. Now its all a big business with profit margins & they r in a cycle with pharmeceutical companies.

      it is proven that any one country cannot operate on one economic system and sustain long term prosperity. just communism, just socialism, just capitalism does not work.

      so hospitals & doctors working on a capitalistic philosophy does not work.

      we have to untilize workable aspects of all systems
      to make it good.

      what is wrong with government paying doctors
      and medical people to help anyone who is sick when they need it. what is wrong with that?

      everyone knows that main purpose of hospitals should
      be treat a patient who comes in. if i had a good job, i would gladly pay cash (actually i do pay cash when ever i have to go to the doctor because i do not have insurance) where does it say we have to get insurance. but if something big happens to me, i won't have any way to pay for it & of course that has become the problem of many.

      instead of paying research scientists 2 billion to find out how many pieces of dust are there on Mars, why not reallocate that money to medicine--that wouldn't increase taxes, u just find the money that is being
      put to misuse and use it to repair what is needed now.

      there r so many theories, what ifs, i think each of us can come up with a solution.

      or as a leader Obama has to say, this is the best system, now we will transition to health care that is available to everyone.

      we don't need anymore insurance coverage--those companies can transition to covering doctors. let doctors get insured to cover if something goes wrong & they have
      to pay out the patient.

      so the government just have to pay the doctor/nurses
      the correct cost for each procedure not a flat fee.
      ie of course bypass surgery cost more than
      a check up for a cold.

      also sometimes it seems doctors r afraid to help people in case they get sued. damn if u do damn if u don't (that is the american way!) :-)

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • There are reasons for and against both sides but this video focuses on several specific situations that only help the argument for private insurance. There has been some competition between private insurers for many years and for every positive outcome mentioned here there are horror stories from people who get turned down for their claims, get dropped because they become ill, or are denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition. I don't believe health care should depend on someone making a profit off of it. Profit too often becomes the deciding factor on treatment decisions.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • wayseeker:

      Then you shouldn't pick the place for older people based on how much it cost. You should just pick the one that helps your relative the most and go into debt because it just doesn't matter how much you pay...because you should just care that much.

      It is the way the world works. People only do things if they are moved to do them by getting something out of it. Either a feeling, a gift, a hug, friendship or money....they do it to get something.

      So even if there was no money doctors would help those that said thank you or showed appreciation more so than those that were grumpy and didn't give any kind of thanks. You honestly think that if money was gone that there wouldn't be another way to abuse?

      People do it with their kids: Be good or I'll take this...if you're good you'll get this. People do that with their job: working hard to get a raise. People do that with gas...going to the place that has a penny less just because they save. Money is the driving force and if you don't see that...then that would be the problem.

      Insurance does not care about you or your family and even if Government takes over that will not change. You have to give incentive for people to do well. That's just how it works.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • The illness and grocery comparison fails because with both private and public insurance there are guidelines as to which treatments will be paid for and which will not. Private insurance may be more likely to deny your claim, as they do now, because it cuts into their profit. People are going untreated because of this.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • wayseeker:

      That's why insurance shouldn't be used at all. All they tend to do is cause too much paper work.

      And if one is to have insurance or something that helps pay then they should have it with them from job to job and they should decide what to do with that money no the insurance company.

      If you are in a group of people and you are asked to work hard and get things done but everyone else isn't working hard what are you most likely to do? Those that are not working hard are not getting into any kind of trouble. So you most likely would end up working as hard as they do. making the job you are all working on take an extremely long time. Inefficient.

      If you are put in a group and there is an incentive to finish as quick and as good as possible then what happens? If it is a group thing people will make sure everyone is working and that they are all doing their best so that the incentive is something the receive. If it's individual then everyone tries their best and gives their best and the project gets done and the one that did the best work (over all) get the incentive.

      The point? People work to get something out of it. If everyone gets the same thing then there's no point in trying to do better. There's no incentive to do better.

      Profit moves people.

      When you shop at a grocery store you go to where you can get the best bargain. Why should health care be any different? Why should we have to pay more in taxes or out of pocket for something that would be cheaper if the doctors were showing their prices and informing people what costs what?

      It's almost as if people for Obama just want a new toy instead of fixing what works and making it better.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • wayseeker:

      No insurance? Every man for himself? Then there should be no auto insurance or home insurance or life insurance? And definitely no Social Security which is an insurance against complete poverty in old age. There will always be the less fortunate and people who don't earn enough to pay premiums or can't meet their deductible no matter how hard they work. Should people who because of family wealth have the education to get higher paying jobs have better health care than others? Yes, profit moves people but sometimes profit moves insurance companies toward greed. I think our difference here is that you don't see health care as a right and I say if it's available, especially in a wealthy country, it should be provided across the board. You probably think I'm a socialist and when it comes to quality of life for people I don't care if this program is somewhat socialistic. World wide people are trying to provide health care for one another so why not in this country? I've probably taken your statement out of context but it gave me a point from which to make a point. I don't think you are entirely wrong. I"m just trying to provide my own perspective.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • wayseeker:

      People pay let's give an example:

      Insurance on Car: $130
      Insurance for health: $100

      That's $230 a month
      one year that's $2,760 a year.
      You don't get sick enough to to pay a deductible on health and you don't get into an accident in 10 years (which is possible...thank you) that's $27,600 that you pay out to nothing and for nothing that you could have used on other things.

      Without insurance you'd have more money to do other things and when you were sick or you do have an accident the cost will not be so astronomical if you have savings that you put some of that money into. You'll be able to pay out of pocket and get what you want done because they will be telling you the cost of this and that and the other.

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • wayseeker:

      Not only that, the government is built on consumption, they produce nothing. All this money that could've gone towards more economic growth for more jobs....but no, the insurance companies had to get their share with protectionism and barriers to entry from the Feds. It is so sad that people think we have a free market today. I am amazed so many people feel we are rich though, wonder how we got that way and wonder why we are losing it, makes we think about the tribal totalitarianism in Africa and socialism and statism in Mexico.....this country is screwed.....and that is the optimistic side.....the whole world will be enslaved to the central planners, the bureaucrats, the lobbyists, and the special interest groups. Instead, we should look to free markets and competitive markets to rebuild our economy. Too bad the government likes slavery more than freedom.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • j_jammer - Again, as with every debate you have some points to make but you keep inferring that no one's really watched the video except you. I don't comment on material I haven't watched carefully and I resent your implication.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
  • J_Jammer
  • hollyMiamiFla
    • 0
      hollyMiamiFla  
    • John Stossel is moron. With all of the animosity towards Castro and his regime no one would ever want to admit that there are aspects of their government that work like health care. I live in Miami and know all to well the Cuban people's plight. But Moore has a point. When is everyone going to wake up and realize that our health care system needs revival. We must move forward and see that everyone in this country has equal access to health care. I just can't understand the blatant selfishness that people exude in this country. It's bad bad karma.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • hollyMiamiFla:

      Cuba has nothing to do with it. What has to do with it, if you paid attention, is the comparison of health care. It's not better. It's got some aspects hat might be better but that was aspects for the rich....not the poor who are the average in Cuba.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • hollyMiamiFla:

      As with every debate you have some points to make but you keep inferring that no one's really watched the video except you. I don't comment on material I haven't watched carefully and I resent your implication.

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • hollyMiamiFla:

      Rejecting slavery on your neighbor is the most altruistic approach. Selfishness is enslaving them to your standard just because you hope it will do better. The problem in this country is government, it has latched on to the healthcare system years ago and it is more coddled than most industries. There is even a term for this fascist system we live under now.....the medical industrial complex. You think healthcare is free market? Seriously? If you seriously believe people are free to choose their healthcare providers and have price competition, then that discredits any other argument you might bring up. Slavery is not the answer and it is what we have had through an array of bureaucratic regulations for decades. A complete overhaul towards something like the failed Cuban or UK model will only make things worse....governments cannot reduce cost, maybe subsidize something distorting the market further, but they can never reduce costs and scarcity. They have created more scarcity through shortages by price distortion and big business protectionism than anything else. Don't listen to the neocons on this either...they just don't like Obama.....at least I bring an economic perspective to the table.....a true economic perspective.

    • 2 years ago
  • sespian
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • I have waaaay too much personal experience to fall for this . Biased . Propaganda . Who does not know someone that the current "healthcare system" has failed ? Hmm . Me , My Mom , My Sister , My aunt , 5 friends . Basically everyone I know who is not quite wealthy or already on medicare . If what the talking head says does not mesh with reality , then the words will not move me in any way . They are empty .

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • My statement is an exact quote and not taken out of context. As I said, how about a program outlining the benefits of public insurance. That's called objective reporting.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • the critics obviously haven't watched the movie. they're mostly only basing their criticisms from what they've heard about the movie rather than basing it on their own judgments. the point Moore was making was not that Cuba's health care system is better than the United States, the point was to show how ridiculous it is that 9/11 volunteers could receive better care in a impoverished poor 3rd world communist country than in the country they volunteered for in one of it's darkest hours.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • diabolical44:

      According to Cubans he went to the privileged hospital not a poor anything. Just because it's a poor country does not mean that they don't have rich people there that get primary care. How is that any different than what people claim here in America?

      And his movie SUCKED. I watched it. It was so pretentious and overly dramatic that it made me puke.

      The only good thing that came out of it was that medications are expensive. Though, I already knew that.

      His movie did nothing to offer any solutions other than mimicking what's already out there. That will not work.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
  • noxidereus
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • diabolical44:

      THIS program did offer help. Again did you watch it? Just so you know that was only a part of the entire thing.

      noxidereus,

      He simply could have just said---WE HAVE A PROBLEM IN HEALTH CARE, AMERICA. And then that would be the end of the entire thing. The movie was full of misleading information that isn't totally true....especially the Cuba one.

    • 2 years ago
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • America has the best healthcare in the world....if you're a MILLIONAIRE.

      If you have a heart attack and are worth $200 million dollars....you live.

      If you have a heart attack and make $30,000 a year AND HAVE INSURANCE you die.

      Why?

      Because the insurance company determined that you have a "pre-existing" condition of a heart and therefore have cancelled all coverage.

      And yet we have tens of thousands of Americans marching on Washington to KEEP this ridiculous system in place.

      (sigh)

      Within 10 years at least half of those morons calling Obama a socialist will get sick......and then have all their medical bills REJECTED by their insurance company.

      "But...but....but America is the greatest country on earth!" they will whimper as they slowly die of tumors in their home. "How could this happen?"

      Because you idiots thought that giving the exact same CEO's who ran Enron and Citibank into the ground total control over your medical decisions was a super idea.

      And those same greedy assholes that thought "credit swap derivitives" was a swell idea to make money are now declining your request for chemotherapy on the grounds that is is "medically unnecessary."

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • crob80227:

      Wrong.

      My grandfather had a heart attack and he lived and he is not rich. He was lucky enough to be helped and then he got transported to Houston where he has been coming ever since. America has great doctors and great equipment. Just because the way in which health insurance works SUCKS...doesn't mean America needs to be like any other country with those long lines and ridiculous waits for things that we, right now, can get without a line.

    • 2 years ago
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • crob80227:

      Is it possible to provide quality healthcare to all taxpaying Americas without having ANY -- ANY!!-- waits whatsoever?

      If the answer is no....then what should change: the idea of "instant" service for EVERY illness irregardless of its actual urgency or the fact that not all taxpaying Americans can GET quality healthcare?

      Something has got to give.

      You can't have everything. The only reason we have "instant" service for hip replacements as opposed to a 1 month waiting period is because we're actively denying coverage to tens of millions of Americans.

      ANY system we create wherein those 40 MILLION Americans are allowed access to healthcare options (like hip replacement) would mean slightly longer wait times.

      Isn't that acceptable for non-ER related operations?

      If the choices are a) NEVER get a hip replacement or b) wait up to 1 month to get a hip replacement.....isn't waiting better than never?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • Stossel: "The private sector does everything better because they compete." This statement by itself reveals that this isn't in any way objective reporting. Remember, this isn't a program about the pros and cons of public health care. It's only supportive of private insurance pedaled by the big insurance companies. How about another program outlining the benefits of public insurance? Fairness is not going to happen because Stossel is only on the side of private insurance companies. I think somehow they've bought him.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • wayseeker:

      Totally taken out of context.

      He said because he was making a statement for a reaction from Moore.

      Try again. Maybe you should help us understand what waiting in line when one has a heart attack helps...or, for that matter, being in a lotto to get a family doctor.

      Instead of nitpicking.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • the constant barrage of shanklinmikes peaceandfreedom spam sucks

      Stossel is a corporate shill and has been for quite some time.

      Either the original poster is woefully uneducated or being deliberately misleading.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • samthesixth
  • Nettle
  • oddree
    • 0
      oddree  
    • The only thing to like about John Stossel is that sweet mustache. Put him in a Hawaiian shirt and he turns into Magnum PI!

      But seriously, his pockets are being lined by some interesting groups these days - http://www.google.com/search?q=john+stossel+Americans+for+Prosperity

      And I could kill his stupid debate on "health savings plans" with my own personal experience. If you never get sick, you're covered. If you are going to become deathly ill, they will cover you once you are all ready broke. If you are consistently sick from an ongoing illness (ie Lupus) you are just plain f*cked. The cost of the plan is what you USED to pay for GOOD insurance, and the deductibles are through the roof.

      "People are concerned about how much things cost when they pay for it themselves". Uh, yeah. Especially when you just gave everyone that works for you a PAY CUT, since their care is out of pocket. Great way to cut costs, douchebag.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
  • noxidereus
    • 0
      noxidereus  
    • John Stossel exposes himself as sell out and a douche. He is literally working with Americans for Prosperity, which is a corporate front group opposed to health care reform, who are behind all the "grass-roots" town hall screamers.

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
  • noxidereus
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • noxidereus:

      This is just a graph of the people who stand to abuse more government to gain market advantages, you forgot to throw in the millions of regular Americans who reject both the current slave system and the one being proposed. You act as if healthcare won't happen without government.....but as 60 years of government regulation and mandates has proven, that is when you get the least amount of healthcare. Just look at the fascist tinged system we have today, and you compare this to our message of free markets? Give me a break, you have NO idea what we are preaching.....no quit comparing us to neocons. You are probably happy Bush doubled Medicare....and you think he is a "conservative" ha

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • Michael Moore is famous for his poor research, but so is John Stossel. He's actually a lot worse.

      As always even though the video is ABC the link is to peacefreedomandhappybunnies.

      Anyone want to provide a link that isn't a portal ad so I can watch it?

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
  • unimatrix0
  • J_Jammer
  • samthesixth
    • 0
      samthesixth  
    • Forget if you hate Moore or Stossel, Republican or Democrat, left or right, blah blah blah. Listen to what your opponents say and refute their arguments. Character assassination is the act of the uninformed.

    • 2 years ago
  • thisismattholt
  • Karen_Costello
    • 0
      Karen_Costello  
    • Michael Moore is such an idiot, liar and an embarrassment to us REAL AMERICANS. NO ONE has health care like AMERICA, but people are going to believe what they want, just look who got elected as a president enough said!

    • 2 years ago
  • imp_print
    • 0
      imp_print  
    • Karen_Costello:

      Did you know that CUBA will pay anyones Medical school bills if you goto CUBA for your education and serve an under privileged community here in the States?
      Now wave your flag and blow more smoke in the air.
      Actions speak louder then BS

    • 2 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • Image
    • Karen_Costello:

      Haha, yeah, a college degree from a communist university....sounds really encouraging. LMFAO

      Is this guy really ignoring the forty million wrongs in Cuba to find one good fascist/socialist policy? Wow, no wonder our world is being enslaved more and more everyday.

    • 2 years ago
  • imp_print
  • atainder
  • booksellergirl
1 - 100 of 113
more from Community:

top videos