Community | September 03, 2009 | 90 comments

Republicans Urged To Keep Kids Home From School on Tuesday, Away From Obama Speech

Image
Found_Avenue
The White House has revised the language of a suggested lesson plan to accompany President Barack Obama’s talk to schoolchildren next week.

The change comes as at least one more Dallas-Fort Worth school district decided Thursday morning not to show the speech. Meanwhile, two Congressmen have urged the Obama administration to release an early transcript of his Tuesday speech, which officials say is meant to underscore the importance of education. Many school districts around Texas and the country said today that they plan to decide soon if and how they will show the speech.

At least a few conservative talk-radio show hosts are urging parents to keep their children home from school Tuesday. Local host Mark Davis has suggested parents keep their kids out of school that day.

Much of the controversy surrounding Obama’s talk has centered on the suggested lessons plan the Department of Education sent to school principals on Aug. 26. Sharp criticism came Tuesday from Jim Greer, chairman of the Florida Republican Party, who lambasted the speech and lesson plans as an attempt to "to spread President Obama's socialist ideology."

In response to complaints, the Obama administration altered one line in a lesson plan proposed for pre-kindergartners through sixth-graders.

The original lesson plan suggested students write down what they can do to help the president. The revised plan suggests students list how they “can achieve their short-term and long-term education goals.” No changes were made to the suggested lesson plan for students in the seventh through twelfth grades.

Area school leaders continued to discuss Thursday whether to show the speech.

Dallas school officials will allow teachers and principals to decide. Richardson ISD was expected to decide today how to proceed.

Lovejoy ISD decided Thursday not to show the speech, in part, because the district doesn’t have the bandwidth to support live web video on WhiteHouse.gov. C-SPAN will also broadcast the speech.

In a letter to parents, Lovejoy Superintendent Ted Moore said he didn’t have a copy of Obama’s planned to say, so teachers couldn’t “prepare a meaningful lesson.”

Two ranking Republican congressmen wrote a letter to the White House on Wednesday urging the administration to release a transcript. U.S. Rep. John Kline, R-Minn, on the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee, and House Republican Policy Committee Chairman Thaddeus McCotter. R-Mich., wrote that letting parents see the remarks now would allow them to decide “whether the material is appropriate for their children.”

“We believe the release of your planned remarks would facilitate the public’s understanding of this unique outreach to students, teachers, and school leaders,” the two Republicans wrote.

The White House said earlier that the speech would focus on "the importance of education, the importance of staying in school, how we want to improve our education system and why it's so important for the country."

Other presidents, including George H.W. Bush in 1991, have given similar speeches directly to students. But some Dallas-area parents said Obama's speech amounts to partisan propaganda.

"It's not a policy speech," said White House spokesman Tommy Vietor on Wednesday. "It's a speech designed to encourage kids to stay in school, which I think is a nonpartisan goal."


-------------

Did everyone read that?

THIS IS A SPEECH DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE KIDS TO STAY IN SCHOOL - NOT A PARTISAN SPEECH, OR A POLICY SPEECH.

TO ANY PARENT WHO IS SO SELF-ABSORBED THAT THEY WOULD KEEP THEIR CHILD HOME FROM SCHOOL IN ORDER TO PREVENT THEM FROM HEARING OUR PRESIDENT SPEAK TO KIDS ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF EDUCATION:

YOU ARE A NEGATIVE INFLUENCE ON YOUR CHILD. PLEASE GIVE HIM OR HER UP FOR ADOPTION ASAP, BEFORE YOU DO ANY ADDITIONAL HARM.

------------------

***9/7/09 UPDATE!!!***

Click here to READ THE TRANSCRIPT:
http://current.com/items/90886697_obamas-transcript-speech-for-americas-youth.ht...

------------------
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Current Tonight,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Education Children Republicans School 5 more
  3.     
    |

90 comments // Republicans Urged To Keep Kids Home From School on Tuesday, Away From Obama Speech

  • nanac
    • 0
      nanac  
    • These ignorant, uncouth people never cease to amaze me ! A large number of these people are the descendants of slave owners and they have a simular mentally.......They hate Obama more than they love their children....There is no reasonable explanation for this idiotic behavior, but racism.

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • Found_Avenue
  • Steward2
  • thepatient
  • kitteneater
  • Found_Avenue
  • samthesixth
    • 0
      samthesixth  
    • And with this misleading headline it goes ot all over the cable world thank to current tv.

      The link mentions two republicans who suggested this tactic.

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • This makes me feel like suing the government for making me sit through so many shitty speeches by Reagan, Bush, Ford, and Nixon. No one consulted my parents before subjecting me to their propaganda and brainwashing about "trickle down" economics.

      If we make the rich get richer than the poor will get more crumbs.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
  • jubal
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • @rrawtry

      But here's the thing, and I know this is hard to hear, but the Irish war hero lost. He lost and so did you. The American people voted for Obama and all he stands for, and not by a little bit, but by a lot. So, yes there will be backward ass places of the country where the loud minority of racists like yourself will bitch and moan and get your way. And here's the other thing...most people in this country value education and the majority of those people, regardless of who they voted for, are scratching their heads and wondering why the you are all getting so worked up over this. And lets be honest...most of them are making the assumption that this is all about race. Which in many cases it is. So when they hear the President's address next week, and because of all the attention so many more people are going to hear it, who do you think they are going identify with? The very reasonable and well spoken President (who is still incredibly popular) who is talking about how much their kids can achieve if they work hard and stay in school...or the angry, racist, redneck, conspiracy theorists who "wouldn't piss on his head if his hair were on fire"? I think you know the answer to that. So guess what? You lose again.

      But thanks for playing your sad, pathetic but predictable part.

    • 3 years ago
  • Steward2
    • 0
      Steward2  
    • Obama and DOE Violate Federal Law Enlisting Kids in Schools to Push Agenda

      20 U.S.C. § 3403. The President must cease this illegal activity.

      September 4, 2009

      20 U.S.C. § 3403 (Pub.L. 96-88, Title I, § 103, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 670)

      http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14102&AlertID=1033

      www.LC.org

      In what is an unprecedented and an illegal political move, President Obama has announced that on Tuesday, September 8, he will bypass parents and directly target their children in an effort to implement his political agenda. Millions of parents are justifiably outraged.

      Obama and DOE Violate Federal Law Enlisting Kids in Schools to Push Agenda

      20 U.S.C. § 3403. The President must cease this illegal activity.

      http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14102&AlertID=1033

      20 U.S.C. § 3403.
      Federal law expressly forbids the Secretary of Education or any officer from exercising "any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution, school, or school system."

      20 U.S.C. § 3403 (Pub.L. 96-88, Title I, § 103, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 670)

      United States Code Title 20.

      Education Chapter 48. Department of Education Subchapter I. General Provisions § 3403. Relationship with States (a) Rights of local governments and educational institutions It is the intention of the Congress in the establishment of the Department to protect the rights of State and local governments and public and private educational institutions in the areas of educational policies and administration of programs and to strengthen and improve the control of such governments and institutions over their own educational programs and policies. The establishment of the Department of Education shall not increase the authority of the Federal Government over education or diminish the responsibility for education which is reserved to the States and the local school systems and other instrumentalities of the States. (b) Curriculum, administration, and personnel; library resources No provision of a program administered by the Secretary or by any other officer of the Department shall be construed to authorize the Secretary or any such officer to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution, school, or school system, over any accrediting agency or association, or over the selection or content of library resources, textbooks, or other instructional materials by any educational institution or school system, except to the extent authorized by law.
      (Italics added for emphasis).20 U.S.C. § 3403.

      Mathew D. Staver, Esq.
      Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel
      Mathew D. Staver, Esq.
      Mathew D. Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, has argued in numerous state and federal courts across the country, including the United States Supreme Court.

      Mat serves as Dean of Liberty University School of Law. He is a trustee for the Supreme Court Historical Society. Mat is considered one of the premier constitutional litigators in the country and conducts hundreds of media interviews each year,

    • 3 years ago
  • Gordon_H
    • 0
      Gordon_H  
    • I got an e-mail from my child's school today informing me that they would not be showing Obama's speech on Tuesday. They offered a convenient yet weak excuse (MAP testing, but how long is the speech going to be anyways, 20 min.?) but I suspect that they have been scared by a few parents who have voiced their displeasure.

      So I ask parent's considering keeping their kid's out of school, when did it become wrong to listen to someone you don't agree with? What are you afraid of?

      Schools are supposed to teach our kids how to be responsible participants in our democracy and this speech allows an opportunity for teachers to talk about our system of government and why it is important to be involved and listen to multiple viewpoints. That way our kids (who are people, not a lesser form of life) can learn what it means to be an informed and responsible voter.

      Unless of course that is not what you want, you don't want your kids to be able to think for themselves. They then might see how little you think for yourself...

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • And there you go. "the chimp"

      Talk all you want about jobs, and Americans being pissed s0uthc0ast. We all know what you really mean. You don't like that a black man is President. That a black man has proven himself your superior. And you're scared to death that your kids are going to recognize that fact. Everything else is racist bluster.

    • 3 years ago
  • s0uthc0ast
    • 0
      s0uthc0ast  
    • Gawd what a funny picture of the chimp and the pod children.
      Get a job 0 so maybe you have an idea what Americans, not republicans and democrats, Americans are so pissed of at you about.
      Honestly, what is going through this tools skull?
      I am encouraging my kids to listen to the twattle from the first twit and afterwards consider how wrong he is on so many levels.
      But, by now we all know how wrong he is.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • @rrawtry

      The first thing a right wing drone always says when caught peddling Limbaugh talking points is "I don't listen to Rush". And the 2nd is that they're really more of a Libertarian...not that I blame you, seems like fewer people everyday want to be considered Republican.

      As for me being "uncontrollable", I guess you expected to just drop your pearls of wisdom without anyone challenging you on them. Sorry, but this isn't the fox news website. If you just want everyone to agree with you, go someplace else.

      And last, can you explain how listening to the elected leader of the country talk about the value of an education is "brain washing"? Are your children so weak minded that they can't be challenged by something as radical as "an education is good"? Or is your parenting so ineffective that exposure to someone you don't agree with makes you this insecure? And is it just Neil Peart who tells you what to think, or are there other drummers from the 70s and 80s influence your world view? Maybe Alex Van Halen or Tommy Lee?

    • 3 years ago
  • Maeveeo
    • 0
      Maeveeo  
    • REPUBS are small minded people , hey kids you wanna be like MOM & DAD & make the U.S.A .look Stupid Like
      that asshole BUSH & Cheney ????? Then become A
      REPUB like your FUCKED UP PARENTS !!!!!!!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • dariusvons
  • rrawtry
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • rrawtry:

      So telling kids to stay in school and get a good education is a "leftist brain washing tactic"?

      I love that you don't get how stupid that makes you look. Keep it up Republicans. You're already in the grave and still pulling dirt on yourselves with both hands.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • rrawtry:

      Right...spewing exactly what Rush tells you to make you an independent thinker and a patriot. Keep telling yourself that rrawtry because you're the only one buying it.

      Like I said...hacks with an agenda. Thanks for proving my point.

    • 3 years ago
  • spectre287
    • 0
      spectre287  
    • rrawtry:

      we said leave our country alone and bush kept going. we said leave iraq alone and bush kept goin.

      that and hes the president, not a god. no one is going to b brainwashed by watching his talking head.

      and finally, its the president, when every other president made a spech americans at least had the dignity to listen to their own elected leader.

      -fucking fascists

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
    • 0
      Found_Avenue  
    • Image
    • rrawtry:

      Here's your evil leftist propaganda. Take a look.

      When you get a chance, after reading this, please let me know exactly which section of this speech seems like BRAINWASHING to you...

    • 3 years ago
  • cheakywillie
  • AreOh
    • 0
      AreOh  
    • LOL! This is absolutely ridiculous. First it's bogus healthcare accusations and now education? These people are simply a cancer that have stooped to such lows as to challenge what should be fundamental rights for every American. Look, I know people here don't like talking about color, but the fact of the matter is people do not like Obama simply because he is a Black American. If you want to argue policy, let's do that. I'm all for healthy debate. But to argue a positive prompting to stay in school from the leader of the free world is a bad thing, ha, is laughable at best, and clearly shows how bigotry addles the brain of a certain swathe of American citizenry.

    • 3 years ago
  • edbr
    • 0
      edbr  
    • This is just disgusting. I sat through many a presidential speech in school, during class, and even when the speeches specifically stated political ideas, agendas, and opinions, never was there such blatant disrespect and disregard for the leader of the free world, even though my views differed from the president's.

      I was always taught to respect the president no matter what! I am ashamed of all those promoting disrespect and hysteria, and frankly, I'm very alarmed at the blatant disregard for our elected leader. Since the economy isn't going to take this country down, we should refocus on helping these irrational paranoid conspiracy theorists with their mental illness.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • I live in Virgina. Two of the rural counties outside of my city have bowed to Republican pressure and are not broadcasting the speech. Think about that...they are not broadcasting a speech by the President of the United States to the school children of the country about the value of an education and a call to work hard and STAY IN SCHOOL. I don't care if you're a liberal or a conservative...a Republican, Democrat, or Independent...but if you can't recognize the lunacy in that, then you're a hack with an agenda.

      And it's as simple as that.

    • 3 years ago
  • pakazak
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • krag2112:

      Well put, krag...

      I have been considering over the past several weeks the current status of the Republican Party as a minority party with a shrinking mandate. I HAD suggested that a strong Republican Party was important to the proper functioning of our society.

      I must admit now that I was wrong. We must never again allow them to rise up to once again be a viable political party. They are a millstone around the neck of our nation. They are determined to drag us down into the muck of ignorance and depravity, bigotry and intolerance, . As we stand over them with our boot to their throat, this is not the time to extent a hand to pull them back up. It is a time to step down. Hard.

    • 3 years ago
  • JuJubeez
    • 0
      JuJubeez  
    • I like the fact that the president is a little more involved than past presidents. And before anyone says it.... He's not asking children to do his job, he's including them and asking for their input.. so if people want to show their ignorance by keeping their kids out of school that day let them. New motto... Never argue with a moron, just let them pull their children out of class

    • 3 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • I hope kids who are made to stay home defy their parents and go to school to not only hear the president speak, but also to keep up on school work.

      Then I would like to see if they get punished for GOING to school instead of cutting class at home...

      What kind of message are we sending our children by doing this: That it is okay to disregard a president if you don't agree with or don't like him/her? That it's okay to cut classes in school as long as some government you didn't vote for is making a speech? That it's okay to listen to a president's speech as long as he's white?

      Never before have I heard of a president's speech to children being boycotted by parents, but I suppose there are firsts for everything...

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • I wouldn't keep my kids home, what's the point? Once they get home sit around the dinner table and discuss the speech/lesson.Make it a learning experience that works at home, too.
      Obama should at least allow the teachers a copy of the speech to do lesson plans around it. I thought that's what they have always done. You know transparency......

    • 3 years ago
  • derk
  • pakazak
  • Found_Avenue
  • pakazak
  • pakazak
    • 0
      pakazak  
    • no, the parents i have seen on tv in this area, from the affluent suburb of barrington, il, are afraid that the president will try to seduce their children with a socialist message.
      this coming from the mf'ers who get the most bang for a lot of my bucks.
      i say pull your kids out of school. homeschool them. stay home with them.

    • 3 years ago
  • littleredmachine
    • 0
      littleredmachine  
    • Part of the yahoo article states that part of what is wrong with Obama's speech is that it's about:

      "how to glorify the president and the presidency"

      So does that mean President's Day is a socialist holiday and should be abolished?

      Do children not learn about presidents in school anymore? When they learn American history, do they learn the opinions of any party that opposed the president on every single issue?

      Why is it that when I was in high school, almost everyone watched the OJ verdict, and yet the president's "stay in school" message is inappropriate?

    • 3 years ago
  • hcice
    • 0
      hcice  
    • littleredmachine:

      You might mean the holiday officially known as "Washington’s Birthday" which is the celebration of the accomplishments and contributions of a great historical president.

      Also, I must have missed the part of the OJ verdict that was a direct speech to the schools.

    • 3 years ago
  • luthreads
    • 0
      luthreads  
    • littleredmachine:

      That is the point, it wasn't directed to schools, yet the televisions in every school room was turned on to see that verdict. I was in the 5th grade and I watched it. It was about a football player that murdered his wife. Totally appropriate for young students...sarcasm. If we could watch that in class, then why is a pro-education speech made by the president such an issue?

    • 3 years ago
  • hcice
    • 0
      hcice  
    • A lot of the objection from parents seems to be because they would like to see a transcript of what their kids are going to be told. That's not an unreasonable request.

      Release the transcript so parents can see that the speech is simply an uplifting outreach to schoolchildren without any political slant.

      If the speech is just telling kids about the importance of education, I have very little issue with the speech going on as planned.

      Also, in direct response to the rant of Found_Avenue at the end of his posting:
      TO ANY PARENT WHO IS SO SELF-ABSORBED THAT YOU CARE TO KNOW WHAT YOUR CHILD IS BEING PRESENTED IN SCHOOL; GOOD JOB, CARRY ON!

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
    • 0
      Found_Avenue  
    • hcice:

      I just find it interesting that no one made any presidents release a transcript in the past, when speaking to our nation's youth. Why, in years past, has it always been taken at face value when OUR NATION'S LEADER said he wanted to communicate a positive and inspiring message to our children? Why were all the others allowed to do this without a second thought? Why were they never asked to provide transcripts? Lesson plans for Obama's Youth Speech were released days ago, even if a full transcript hasn't made it out yet. Why were our past Commanders-In-Chief not challenged in this incessant and insulting manner when they felt like trying to inspire your children, and why is it SUDDENLY a national issue when the the President Of The United States wants to speak to the children of America in order to impart the value of getting a good education?

      If you can find me an answer to these questions beyond XENOPHOBIA AND PERSONAL PREJUDICE, I'll be impressed.

      This is why I feel that these parents are a negative influence on their children. Any parent who is so fearful and brainwashed by pundits that they actually BELIEVE that KEEPING THEIR KID OUT OF SCHOOL FOR A DAY is a healthier and smarter option than sending their kid to school that day SO THEY DON'T MISS ANYTHING IN THEIR CLASSES (Gee, what a novel fucking concept! Making sure your child stays up to date with his or her work!) while simultaneously granting permission for their child hear a standard, Public Service Announcement-type speech from OUR NATION'S LEADER about the importance of STAYING IN SCHOOL......!??!?!
      A person who keeps their child home from school, in this scenario, is an unfit parent who is contributing to the delinquency of a minor by allowing them to cut their classes. They are raising their child to disrespect authority, and to take their school attendance and school work lightly.

      If you think that's the proper way to raise a child, be my guest.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • hcice:

      @ hcice:

      Did you call for the same request for transcripts of Bush, Clinton or Reagan (just to name a few)? Of course you didn't.

      When I see this false outrage over people "playing the race card" I can't help but think about a tee shirt I once saw that said "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean I'm not being followed". Just because you can gin up some outrage about being called a racist, doesn't mean you're not a racist.

      To be clear, I support your right to call for a transcript and when you don't get one to keep your kids home from school. That's your call and nobody can or should take that away from you. But when you take those actions, then it's my right to judge you to be a narrow minded bigot. It's also my right to pity your children, which I do. If you don't like being judged by your actions...change your actions.

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • Found_Avenue
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • Ok, so since no one has read the speech, conservatives can assume that he is going to be reading Mein Kampf to your children.

      Seriously, every president does this. George W Bush did is when he read a book to school children, Bill Clinton went to speak to several schools across the country. Why is this now "An Issue"? Why are people now worried Obama is "trying to indoctrinate our children"? I didn't know telling kids to stay in school was brainwashing...

      Perhaps if we brainwashed more kids with "Stay In School Brainwashing" the High School dropout rates would plummet, national test scores would rise, and we wouldn't be the middle ground of world education.

    • 3 years ago
  • pakazak
  • thestick
    • 0
      thestick  
    • All I know is
      DID ANYONE FOR OR AGAINST ACTUALLY READ THE SPEECH???
      when you do, then you can factually say you know what you're talking about?
      Anyone who takes a POLITICIAN for their word is less than intelligent
      so all y'all Obaminators please remember he's not a savior, he's not just a regular joe, he's a politician - born and bred.

    • 3 years ago
  • quixotic12
    • 0
      quixotic12  
    • thestick:

      I think the word you're looking for is "bred", not "bread". And he was hardly born and bred a politician, seeing as how no one else in his family is in politics.

      The fact of the matter is that the lesson plans were released beforehand. Are you always so cynical? Obama's only political motivation in this case would be to make him look more wholesome and non-partisan. Why would he bother indoctrinating children that won't even be close to old enough to vote for him in the next election? This is a public service announcement, not leftist propaganda. And if anyone really looked closely at Obama's policies, a half-wit could see that he's a centrist and not a left-winger at all.

    • 3 years ago
  • thestick
    • 0
      thestick  
    • thestick:

      duelly noted...wasn't his dad an ambassador in / to kenya or something?
      No i don't believe any politicians. I voted for Obama because of his stance on this illeagal war. He hasn't changed a thing.

    • 3 years ago
  • squeee
    • 0
      squeee  
    • thestick:

      obama was not born and bred a politician. his father was not an ambassador though his father did graduate from Harvard in economics. obama also graduated from Harvard. I'd have to say to some people he may be a savior compared special ed bush...haha
      hes intellegent, something we need.. these republicans just need to give him a chance and things will change.
      i know very soon that they will be bringing back our troops because it will give us trillions of dollars...i mean obamas cash for clunkers boosted the economy a little. this man is smart and we just need to give him a chance

    • 3 years ago
  • thestick
    • 0
      thestick  
    • thestick:

      Sorry his dad was a senior governmental economist for Kenya. And George Bush was never elected. Another reason not to trust politicians. "Oops, the election just happened to get mixed up in the state that my brother is the govenor"
      Obama suffers from the same thing that scag-baron bush did - a rubber stamp congress!!
      Can't trust 'em the same way i couldn't trust congress in the early bush days.
      Tom DeLay, Jack Abramoff those are the type of maggots that are attracted to power and I wouldn't doubt that Dems have similar species in their ranks. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Thats what everybody is scared of. Everybody hates govt control but some have a different view when its "their" party in power

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • pakazak
    • 0
      pakazak  
    • hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

      omg
      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    • 3 years ago
  • lulu81
  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • Why is it you leftist thugs always cry "Racism!" when someone claims they disagree with Obama's socialist agenda? You throw it out there as a label, it gives you an excuse to refuse any meaningful dialogue as to what our president in trying to force on us. When you have no leg to stand on, you play the race card. ALWAYS! Racists are a low, low class of people. The only thing worse to me is a person who calls those who oppose Obama's agenda "racists". You do a great disservice to your cause by labelling your opponents "racists". It shows just how narrow minded you really are- seeing "racists" every time you hear of someone who disagrees with Obama. You need to deal with reality.

    • 3 years ago
  • littleredmachine
    • 0
      littleredmachine  
    • unclecharlie:

      The same goes for conservatives who throw around the term "socialism."

      This country is already a blend of socialism and capitalism.

      Public schools = socialism
      Public roads = socialism
      Public safety (police, fire, court system, etc.) = socialism
      Public works (water, garbage pickup, etc.) = socialism

      Seeing a pattern here?

      Want to give up any of these things in your decry of socialism?

    • 3 years ago
  • lu7cky
    • 0
      lu7cky  
    • unclecharlie:

      thank you for making sense unc!
      the truly sad part is that all of the people out there yelling "socialism" enjoy the benefits of our society. They should try to live without these public programs for a while, then maybe they could appreciate the need for them. I think that people are confusing social responsibilty with socialism and I can't seem to understand how they equate this with fascism.

    • 3 years ago
  • thestick
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • unclecharlie:

      It's not an agenda, unless telling kids to stay in school and get an education is a political agenda.

      That just show the fact some conservatives have an irrational hate for Obama: He can't even make a "Stay In School" speech without someone calling him a "Brainwashing Nazi Socialist".

      Stop thinking with your party and use your BRAIN.

    • 3 years ago
  • hcice
    • 0
      hcice  
    • unclecharlie:

      Most of these parents simply want to see a transcript of the speech to see that it is just "telling kids to stay in school and get an education" and nothing political.

      Since when did wanting to know what my kids are told in school become bad parenting?

    • 3 years ago
  • DougChristian
    • 0
      DougChristian  
    • unclecharlie:

      You conservatives are lying to yourselves. Your hatred and fear of Obama is irrational. You hate hearing it, but we all know where it's coming from.

      When we're talking about a policy issue, like healthcare, the race-card stuff is obnoxious and wrong. When we're talking about small town Americans livid at the thought of their president speaking about the importance of school to their kids the racial implications are obvious.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • unclecharlie:

      Sorry unclecharlie...your argument doesn't hold water. You can disagree with Obama all day long and not be called a racist. But when you lie about what he's saying and suggest that he is somehow indoctrinating school children then YOU are the one who's being narrow minded and that's when we question your motives. It's perfectly logical to think that this is racially motivated. If you don't like it...and I can see why you wouldn't...try examining your own actions. And by the way, I don't seem to remember anyone asking to see President Bush's or President Reagan's transcripts before they spoke to school children. What race were those guys again? @hcice...did you request those transcripts?

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • A) such tactics only work if the public doesn't know it's happening. if brain dead republicans could figure it out it would fail...and i think a constitutional law scholar would know that.

      B) man...if your kids are dumb enough to be indoctrinated to the political ideals of one man after one "stay in school" speech...man, you got dumb kids

      C) admit it people, youre racists. if your screaming about this speech it's purely because your afraid of obama and the only thing scary about obama is that he's a different color. he hasn't done ANYTHING to justify the amount of hysteria he's received, and a helluva a lot less than bush, who is still supported by a number of you kooks

      D) I hate racists.

    • 3 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  
    • If it is so non-partisan and uplifting, why won't he release a transcript to the parents beforehand so they can decide what's best for their children? Why won't he offer equal time for rebuttal to the other side of the aisle so the children can make their own decisions?

    • 3 years ago
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • JohnA:

      "why doesn't he just have someone stalk him with a camera at all time to PROVE he isn't a socialist fascist nazi??? why doesn't he take the time to answer your direct questions!?? CLEARLYBECAUSE HE IS A NAZI! "

      this is what you sound like dude. a crazy person

      "Why won't he offer equal time for rebuttal to the other side of the aisle so the children can make their own decisions?"

      because it's a friggin STAY IN SCHOOL SPEECH. how are you going to rebut that? "don't stay in school!" ?

      christ. shouldn't you be workign at your oh so difficult job? or did you give that up because the gov was taking your money away to give to poor people?

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
    • 0
      Found_Avenue  
    • JohnA:

      Do you think anyone wants to offer a "rebuttal" to the statement: "Hey, Kids. Stay in school. Work hard, and take your education seriously."

      What kind of moron would want to offer the opposing side to THAT statement?

      I don't think you understand what this speech is. They may not have sent out a finished transcript, but they sent lesson plans to all the schools, detailing exactly what's covered. It was designed to speak to children. It has no policy in it. It's very basic Public Service Announcement / Afterschool Special type of stuff - literally nobody with half a brain would even HAVE a "rebuttal" against it.

      When the whole thing is said and done, after the speech is made, I ENCOURAGE you to take the transcript and craft yourself a little "rebuttal" to his inspiring words of encouragement. No one will be able to argue with that speech without sounding pretty darn ignorant. Guaranteed.

    • 3 years ago
  • DougChristian
    • 0
      DougChristian  
    • JohnA:

      What's the matter with you? Liberals don't complain and ask for transcripts when conservatives speak at schools. You know why? Because speaking to kids is expected of the president, watching political events of any stripe is good for kids, and we're not freaking insane. Even if you disagree with the speaker, it offers at a minimum the chance to spark a discussion with your kid and teach them your view.

      So when your kids come home saying the President seems really smart and nice, you can explain how he's really a secret, Muslim, Black Panther who is determined to kill their grandparents and destroy America. Otherwise, bringing that stuff up out of the blue is awkward.

    • 3 years ago
  • krag2112
    • 0
      krag2112  
    • JohnA:

      Rebuttal. That is hilarious...good one JohnA. Oh, wait. You're serious. Really?

      I really am engrossed by your transformation John. It's fascinating to see someone succumb to bitterness and completely lose their bearings. Sad, but fascinating.

    • 3 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
  • Found_Avenue
  • Found_Avenue
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • Oh yargh. I really hope the parents don't pull their own children out of school. Bitch move on their part if they do.

    • 3 years ago
  • alivein85
  • dariusvons
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • classic conservative move.... keep your children ignorant. that's how they got to be that way themselves... the tradition of voluntary ignorance continues.

    • 3 years ago
  • thestick
    • 0
      thestick  
    • dariusvons:

      I don't think its "conservative" more like tolitarian. Others may call themselves conservative to protect their prejudice state of mind. Please don't confuse the two, otherwise you are playing into their hand and justifying their view

    • 3 years ago
  • littleredmachine
  • StarryeyedFacebreaker
  • clownpuncher
  • Inofuilwell
    • 0
      Inofuilwell  
    • StarryeyedFacebreaker:

      @clownpuncher

      It is "you're", dropout.

      Keeping kids at home is both racist and bigoted and there is no other way to describe the sore losers in the Republican Party.

      They had so few original ideas that they had to hijack the Ron Paul followers' "Tea Party" protests and claim them for their own. What losers.

    • 3 years ago
  • littleredmachine
  • Inofuilwell
    • 0
      Inofuilwell  
    • Progresshiv:

      Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Cla.... oops! Wrong answer. Not only are there that many morons, they are called Townhall Shoutdown Creeps and they shout over disabled women in wheelchairs who (major point >>) HAVE THE FREAKING FLOOR!

      Townhall Shoutdown Creeps = sore loser Republicans = Neanderthals!

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
    • 0
      SDLN  
    • Progresshiv:

      There's seems to some sort of competition going on, where people are trying to see who can stand up and shout "I'm a moron!" the loudest. It's a very bizarre time.

    • 3 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • Progresshiv:

      Come now, Progressiv. You have been posting here for some time now. Don't tell me you haven't seen the several dozen regular nut jobs just on this SITE who feel the same way. These are people who would allow Cheyney to hold their kids on his knee (presumably right before mistaking junior for a pheasant and blowing his face off) and whisper 12 kinds of evil in his ear...but would balk at their kids listening to Obama...

    • 3 years ago
  • Inofuilwell
    • 0
      Inofuilwell  
    • Progresshiv:

      Censorship never works. Current censored every post about Laura Ling and her producer while they were in the hands of the North Koreans.

      Other sites did not.

      I doubt that Current had as much diplomatic input as Clinton or Obama but that is just my observation.

      Judging from seeing how they put up with people using all sorts of four-letter words but on the other hand will decide to censor someone else for calling an idiot "an idiot".

      I guess they are more about not hurting someone's feelings.more than they are for people refraining from obscene language.

      Kinda like Cheney and the "F-Bomb" her hurled at Leahy in front of several people in the Senate Chambers.

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:

top videos