Community | September 04, 2009 | 130 comments

Gates says AP decision to print photo of dying marine 'appalling'

Image
JanforGore
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is objecting “in the strongest terms” to an Associated Press decision to transmit a photograph showing a mortally wounded 21-year-old Marine in his final moments of life, calling the decision “appalling” and a breach of “common decency.”

The AP reported that the Marine’s father had asked – in an interview and in a follow-up phone call — that the image, taken by an embedded photographer, not be published.

The AP reported in a story that it decided to make the image public anyway because it “conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it.”

The photo shows Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Bernard of New Portland, Maine, who was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade in a Taliban ambush Aug. 14 in Helmand province of southern Afghanistan, according to The AP.

Gates wrote to Thomas Curley, AP’s president and chief executive officer. “Out of respect for his family’s wishes, I ask you in the strongest of terms to reconsider your decision. I do not make this request lightly. In one of my first public statements as Secretary of Defense, I stated that the media should not be treated as the enemy, and made it a point to thank journalists for revealing problems that need to be fixed – as was the case with Walter Reed."

“I cannot imagine the pain and suffering Lance Corporal Bernard’s death has caused his family. Why your organization would purposefully defy the family’s wishes knowing full well that it will lead to yet more anguish is beyond me. Your lack of compassion and common sense in choosing to put this image of their maimed and stricken child on the front page of multiple American newspapers is appalling. The issue here is not law, policy or constitutional right – but judgment and common decency.”

The four-paragraph letter concluded, “Sincerely,” then had Gates’ signature.

The photo, first transmitted Thursday morning and repeated Friday morning, carries the warning, “EDS NOTE: GRAPHIC CONTENT.”

The caption says: “In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 14, 2009, Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard is tended to by fellow U.S. Marines after being hit by a rocket propelled grenade during a firefight against the Taliban in the village of Dahaneh in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan. Bernard was transported by helicopter to Camp Leatherneck where he later died of his wounds.”

Gates’ letter was sent Thursday, after he talked to Curley by phone at about 3:30 p.m. Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said Gates told Curley: “I am asking you to reconsider your decision to publish this graphic photograph of Lance Corporal Bernard. I am begging you to defer to the wishes of the family. This will cause them great pain.”

Curley was “very polite and willing to listen,” and send he would reconvene his editorial team and reconsider, Morrell said. Within the hour, Curley called Morrell and said the editors had reconvened but had ultimately come to the same conclusion.

Gates “was greatly disappointed they had not done the right thing,” Morrell said.

The Buffalo News ran the photo on page 4, and the The (Wheeling, W.Va.) Intelligencer ran an editorial defending its decision to run the photo. Some newspapers – including the Arizona Republic, The Washington Times and the Orlando Sentinel – ran other photos from the series. Several newspaper websites – including the Akron Beacon-Journal and the St. Petersburg Times – used the photo online.

Morrell said Gates wanted the information about his conversations released “so everyone would know how strongly he felt about the issue.”

The Associated Press reported in a story about deliberations about that photo that “after a period of reflection,” the news service decided “to make public an image that conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it.

end of excerpt
_________
So what do you think? Did AP go over the line?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   YWR,   Stop War,   2 more
  2. tags:
    War Afghanistan END THIS WAR Journalistic Integrity 1 more
  3.     
    |

130 comments // Gates says AP decision to print photo of dying marine 'appalling'

  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • anyone agreeing that this photo should have been released then they are agreeing to the forcing the family to lose their son over and over and over and over again.....for what? A lost cause.

      Yes, father, you who are crying you deserve to lose your son over and over again for our greedy wantings to show that this photo will single handily stop the war.

      Heartless.

    • 2 years ago
  • funnicus
    • 0
      funnicus [removed]  
    • Any picture would be better than the one displayed, the little punk looks like Bea Arthur's vagina. Boo hoo one dead future cop. Let's see the photos of the innocent women, babies and children this guy mutilated or helped to.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • maof4brats
    • 0
      maof4brats [removed]  
    • you know whats sad is this did not affect me,I have seen worst with the picture my broether brought home from Nam. And I think the whole world has become desensitive to anything like this,we have horror movies that are bloody and people just laugh.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • maof4brats:

      That comment....is the reason why showing a picture doesn't alter anyone's thinking on the war.

      So the picture is pointless....the only person it matters to is AP and their pretend care...as well for anyone else that thought it's a right to show such a picture.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • maof4brats:

      It was printed to make money, pure and simple. Media whores and pimps do not care about a family's wishes. The AP has proven this by their decision. If your child was dying from an armed robbery gunshot, would it be acceptable to film and publish the death throes of your child?

    • 2 years ago
  • Rosenquartz
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Romans saw brutal, bloody deaths as entertainment.

      The new film Gamer points out that humans don't care as much as you are telling us they do. The Gamer points out that people see blood and guts and want more...it doesn't make them want less just because the blood flies in their face. Distance is a problem and people see it in a picture it's the exact same thing. But if you want people to stop a war the only way you could do that is by bringing them the war to their front steps. then they won't like it.

      Meaning the photo is not going to do it. It's a farce to suggest it can or that many like it can. It's such a lie by the AP and anyone that agrees with what they have done.

      History has pointed out that no amount of proof of what war does has ever stopped a single war.

      Good luck in finding an example to back up this picture being a start of stopping war. You won't find one.

    • 2 years ago
  • funnicus
  • J_Jammer
  • maof4brats
    • 0
      maof4brats [removed]  
    • I remember seeing alot of this in the 60's hey people getting their brains blown out right in front of us. A monk setting himself on fire. Blown up soldiers. Yeh it is bad that they show this crap but you know what that is what WAR is! Lets not sugar coat the Fucking war people die, our goverment says that the AP is wrong no it news I am sorry this happened to this poor baby but it's the wars fault not the AP.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • krush_productions
    • 0
      krush_productions  
    • War is raw, unorganized, unethical. Why try and hide the facts? We constantly complain about fighting, sending young men and women away to die, then when an image from that nightmare surfaces we all shun it. WHAT THE FUCK do you people want? Everyone needs to see these images, it shows the real war. It's a visual that disturbs and hopefully discourages one from joining themselves.

      Good if it makes you uneasy, sick to your stomach. Do something to change it or go back to name calling and bickering amongst one another. This kid died, and so will many more as long as we keep on with this shit.

    • 2 years ago
  • Cynic2
  • funnicus
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • funnicus:

      Your are truly funny. Now why don't you post photos of the World Trade Towers 9/11, the Pentagon 9/11, Lockerbie crash, Muslim bombings around the world??? Now that is what the AP should have posted while manipulating the minds of Americans and other World citizens. You are not really tuned into the World are you?

    • 2 years ago
  • funnicus
  • MoonLoon
  • funnicus
    • 0
      funnicus [removed]  
    • funnicus:

      The US attacked the pentagon to hide the fact that they shot down a passenger plane. "the us hired muslims" lol what an idiot. LIke I said, learn some facts jackass. Don't try saying I said something stupid or I will check you on it. Got it?

    • 2 years ago
  • funnicus
    • 0
      funnicus [removed]  
    • What the heck if this guy died for "freedom" like everyone says, post all the pictures, post the pictures of the men women and children this guy mutilated from long distance. Post it all. Post my opinion of people who rush off to kill in a war Post my opinion that society is better off without him and his kind. That stuff is not posted, so post that this idiot died for NOTHING. You are not free.

    • 2 years ago
  • ras_menelik
  • ras_menelik
  • yonie
    • 0
      yonie  
    • Image
    • Also read the AP response in this article at ap.org: AP and the Death of a Marine

      From the article an interesting bit for your reference:

      'Journalists embedded with U.S. forces in Afghanistan must sign a statement accepting a series of rules which among other things are designed to protect operational security and lives of the soldiers and Marines who are hosting them.

      Critics also maintain some of the rules are aimed at sanitizing the war, minimizing the sacrifice and cruelty which were graphically depicted by images from the Civil War to Vietnam where such restrictions were not in place.

      The rule regarding coverage of "wounded, injured, and ill personnel" states that the "governing concerns" are "patient welfare, patient privacy and next of kin/family considerations."

      "Casualties may be covered by embedded media as long as the service member's identity and unit identification is protected from disclosure until OASD-PA has officially released the name. Photography from a respectful distance or from angles at which a casualty cannot be identified is permissible; however, no recording of ramp ceremonies or remains transfers is permitted."'

    • 2 years ago
  • yonie
    • 0
      yonie  
    • From the article:

      'The AP reported in a story that it decided to make the image public anyway because it “conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it.”'

      And i fully agree. The American public should be confronted with the results of the wars they fight. Anything else would be censorship for means of propaganda.

    • 2 years ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • yonie:

      Censorship for the purpose of propaganda is a very old practice. At not prime time hours, the satelite movie channels bring out movies from the early 1940s which were the WW2 years. There's one B & W film made in 1943 called Guadalcanal Diary in which is dripping with propaganda instead of red blood to whip up the masses. It deals with the war crimes of the Japanese to unite the public in race hatred against the Japanese which is why they had to forcibly place Neisei (Japanese/Americans) in renovated forts for their own safety. The television was 1st used in 1939 to broadcast an American baseball game(since it was an American invention) So it's no surprise that George Orwell wrote1984 while living in Nazi occupied Paris during 1943. He knew how easily the mass media can mind control the masses to gain grassroots support for any war, even
      though it starts as a justified, defensive war. Truth is the 1st casualty of any war. TV has become the Fascist Corporate hypnotism to massage the masses to desensitize them to brutality, to get them to blindly accept war as something other than what it realy is- a for profit Organized Crime activity. Because there is no m.o. in warfare that isn't criminal in civil standards.
      I'm a Bhuddist who converted in 1972 after the anti VietNam war protests I made in marches. The only way to end wars is to not contend, because fighting any war fights FOR war,not against it. That's why Bhuddists don't react. Because it would only escalate conflict. Peace is like Gold itself, it's valuable and endures beyond the disease of conflict because it doesn't react to anything. Case in point: Japanese
      are Bhuddists too, yet their minds were so subverted by race hatred against anyone who wasn't Japanese, in the same way the Germans were against anyone who wasn't German that Tojo & Hitler were able to mind control them with the delusions of grandeur that they were invincible. Back that up with the pathological
      liars their Fascist leaders were,root that in obsession, and all 3 factors spell criminal insanity, which is all that war is. Cold blooded violence is a disease that
      reason, and diplomacy can't reach because it's evil per se. It's a contest to see which side can be pitted to develop the worse evil. So the victor is also the looser. Hitler's mad vision of nuclear proliferation is now the nightmare of the USA with Iran, N. Korea, et al
      wanting in. There is no "way" to Peace save Peace per se. Head types call that enlightenment. Tail types call that nonsense. But since wars always waste all the time, labor, and money produced in any country's economy-including humans & their way of life, causing Recessions and Depressions...Is that simply nonsense too ?

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • yonie:

      As a presumably educated person you are well aware of the P.O.W. death rate for Japanese held prisoners vs. German held P.O.W.'s? 27%-29% died in Japanese hands. About 10% died under the loving care of Nazi's. Another over the hill hippy spouting nonsense.

    • 2 years ago
  • acontradiction
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • acontradiction:

      First I'm pretty sure you don't respect a god damn thing acontradiction except your own pathetic point of view. they do show reporters getting killed like the one the Israeli defence force shot with a tank round a while back that was very gruesome but I'm sure you whacked off good to that one didn't you. admit it you probably just like seeing people dieing hu? I bet you could probably look at a hundred pictures of Marines dieing and would come back for seconds. Keep the wars going so we can get more of these pictures eh contra?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • There have been pictures of war for generations and has that stopped men from causing war? Has it made citizens stand up? No.

      You know why?

      Apathy and it's not over here. So when it's not in someone's face all the time they're not going to care and even if it is in their face it won't make them car any more than they already don't.

      So justifying any war picture with people need to see has no backing of altering people's view on war that they already had before.

      Disturbing pictures no more get someone to get up and do something as does an angry words gets someone to care.....

      It's like yelling to get someone to calm down.

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • Yeah but he was only pissed cus pictures of dying marines are bad for enlistment numbers and troop morale, not for the reasons everyone thinks he's pissed about the photo for.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • hombre76
  • J_Jammer
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • EmperorThan:

      what the fuck is "OBJECTIVITY" you keep going on about? I'm not a fucking reporter I'm a private citizen who says what he want and does not give a stick of shit what someone like you thinks or says about it. So take you "OBJECTIVITY" you thought you were being so clever brandishing about and shove it where the sun don't shine bucko.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • MoonLoon
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • Yes, blame the newspaper, that is showing what the Government did to your son by putting him in harm's way.

      Don't blame the US government for continueing with two bloody wars that kill US servicemen and women every day.

      Blame the NEWSPAPER for making us think about what the Government is doing.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • asherp:

      j-jammer I am amazed at how many posts you make here at current. .....It's almost as though you think someone cares or that people like you........it so special.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • asherp:

      Why should a newspaper get blamed for showing people what's happening in the world because of a matter of government policy?

      I think that they are heros for publishing it.

      The weak thing would have been to cower and not publish it.

      It took real bravery and commitment to the truth to publish that.

      Now if you want to talk about the role that the press played in the lead up to the war, that is a different argument. What we're talking about now, is THIS photo, and the decision to publish it.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • asherp:

      They won't change the war or make it stop. No picture in history has ever stopped war.

      NONE.

      So it wasn't brave, it was stupid...especially when they were asked, by the family, NOT to.

      You can't justify that in your little Amoral world.

    • 2 years ago
  • mookster_07
  • J_Jammer
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • After all that has gone down in the last eight years people still don't know the horrors of war? How many pictures do they need before they open their mouths? How many previous wars already showed us that and yet here we are again? What will it then take? How many mothers and fathers will have to cry over the bodies of their children on all sides before they become "more aware?"

    • 2 years ago
  • hombre76
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • JanforGore:

      Jan, you must realize that people are bombarded by so many images, ideas, concepts and advertisements on a daily basis. Especially if they watch TV; which a vast majority of American do; watch TV. It has become a mighty oracle that tells them what to think, what to wear, what to eat, what to believe, and mostly how to behave. It like "Network" or even "They Live".

      The only thing that people respond to is shock and awe. Love and caring nurturing and all the great spiritual blessings cannot compete with the monstrous Zeitgest that is Mainstream Media.

      That is why it is important for the real things to be shown. That is why the censorship of war images is so great, because if the real war was televised, people would be jumping out of their skin demanding that we stop, investigate, put perpetrators on trial.

      Remember, it was the images from Germany and the bodies of Jews being dumped into mass graves that finally marshaled the collective will of the American people to fight Germany in WW2. It was the graphic images of Vietnam that marshaled the collective will of the American people to end that war.

      Images are extremely powerful conveyors of information and help to create myths. It can create presidents and destroy kings.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • JanforGore:

      Maybe a few photos of the victims of 9/11 will jog some memories. Maybe close up shots of the mangled and burnt bodies from Lockerbie will remind the clueless of the wages of pacifity.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • JanforGore:

      And I never stated I was against the photo being shown, but that I was against going against the wishes of his parents and not doing at least something to maintain the dignity of it based on their wishes. If they gave permission THEN FINE. So I doubt I will be posting anymore to this News site regarding this war. So tired of having my opinions twisted to suit those who only wish to attack my views.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • JanforGore:

      Jan, you know you are on to something when Current Member attack. Don't give up. Your critical thinking skills are reaching people. Who gives a crap what a few people think on this website. There are a bunch of loudmouthed fools here and those that are here to steer the discourse away from a sincere inquiry into truth.

    • 2 years ago
  • besic
    • 0
      besic  
    • The public needs to be more aware of how terrible war is and at what grave danger we put our troops every day in useless wars. I am sorry but all war's are wrong, I grew up in war and I don't wish that upon anybody. If more people saw how bad it was we would do everything we can to prevent all of them from ever happening. I hope that those people who saw the picture think about trying to help the remaining ones come back home and stay home to protect us from here. My deepest sympathy to the family, I have lost my father in a war, and the pain of losing one of the most important people in your life is the hardest thing you will ever have to endure. I truly am sorry for that.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Really? Then why isn't this same free press exposing the REAL REASONS we are over there in the first place and what has happened to the people of Afghanistan because of it? The Taliban is just the smoke and mirrors diversion. Where is the outrage from people about the oil pipelines, spraying of Glyphosate, Monsanto's ( and other companies') stranglehold on these farmers, their secret little drug war, and using it as a conduit to Pakistan?

      We are there for the military industrial complex and these young men don't deserve to die for it anymore than an Afghan child. They then didn't show this because of their sudden caring or to show us the horrors of war (as this war is already opposed by a majority of Americans) they did it for sensationalism. There's a difference.

      Until this media gets the guts to print a headline that actually STANDS UP to this government in calling for this war TO END, they are only part of the reason why it continues and more die regardless of the photos they print.

    • 2 years ago
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • JanforGore:

      Let me get this straight you don't think people are doing enough but you bitch when the AP at least does something to expose the waste of this war. The more of your comments I read the more I'm convinced you'd bitch about anything as long as people see that your tougher than everyone else onwhatever the daily beef is. your like that person that always has to one up every one else it's pretty pathetic really. But whatever floats your boat. Have fun being pissed about everything and everyone, let me know how popular that makes you or your causes.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • JanforGore:

      She may be a complainer more so than most, but that does NOT mean that what she has decided to complain bout today is less important.

      If you base what you think of a situation on who is telling you about it instead of the merits of the situation itself....you're being too emotional.

      Emotion is not a problem until it blinds you enough that all you see is your fixation on a single person instead of the bigger picture they are trying to convey.

      Bringing death here, death there....this is bad, American bad, this war is bad...blehblehbleh

      does NOT make what the AP did any better or make it less worse and we should just all be ok with it. So stop pretending you're objective and start noticing how you don't have a heart.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • JanforGore:

      Oh my, you have no reply about the content so you attack me. Typical. So I am COMPLAINING by stating I want this war to end and that this chicken sh** media is only an accomplice in its continuation by cherrypicking its coverage proving it isn't about caring but about sales and ratings? That's says much about you. I suppose people who work for better work conditions, healthier food, and cleaner water are complainers too? What BS. The point remains if this is such a FREE PRESS then they need to PROVE IT ALL THE WAY.

      And for your enlightenment, it is "complainers" like myself that got women the vote, environmental laws to protect our air and water passed, and held the feet of politicians to the fire all of these years. You find it to be complaining to simply diminish the validity of what I typed. Goodie for you.

    • 2 years ago
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • JanforGore:

      I made my comment for the thread Jan I'm addressing your constant bitch about how you do so much and the rest of us just dont do enough even while comenting on some people doing something it hypicritical and I wanted to point that out. So drop the whiny "whay are you attacking me?" 'why dont you respond to the thread?" boo hoo.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • JanforGore:

      Where have I typed that I do so much more than anyone? Project much? Again, you can't address the comment based on its validity so you make a personal comment. My opinion on it stands. When this media starts showing ALL OF IT on both sides and demanding this war end, perhaps they will then look credible instead of cherrypicking only what they want to show for sensationalistic value. But hey, let's see how many people show up in front of the White House today demanding this war end because they saw that one picture. Will you be there?

    • 2 years ago
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • JanforGore:

      No I wont be there Jan. I suppose you can drop what ever you are doing and throw down the cash to go to DC and protest, frankly if you can good on ya. But I digress,I personally can not afford to drop everything nor do I have the cash necessary to travel to DC but I do what I can where I am when I can. And here we get to my gripe about you its not enough obviously to you and some how I think if I told you I went to DC and was unable to accomplish anything I suppose you would dig on that too. It's a good thing I know better than to try and please people like you.

    • 2 years ago
  • Betico
    • 0
      Betico  
    • its FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. Dear Mr. Gates, war is apalling. Let more photos such as this one serve as reminders before we attack any other country again.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • dunkledomy
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • dunkledomy:

      Dunkle, you are an ass. America was the victim of a terroist attack by Muslim extremists. Clearly you are an uneducated victim of a liberal press, most likely from outside of the U.S. Americans by and large do not give a flying f88k about other countries, as long as they stay within their moronic borders and reject terroism as a political weapon.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • they should have cameras on every gun over there. we pay for this war, we should see what war really is. kids killing kids for the greed of old dirty bastards.

      dont forget, this man signed up for war !.he volunteered......the women and children we kill over there never had a choice.....

      the only thing america is making is enemies !

      we will reap what they have sown !

    • 2 years ago
  • iammyfathersson
    • 0
      iammyfathersson  
    • Only by journalists doing this sort of thing will the war(s) come to an end. When people start seeing these types of things then and only then will a national outrage develop. That being sad, protect the d**n family. Haven't they suffered enough. If you can't find a way to let people see this picture without causing extra grief to his loved ones then you suck at your job.

      BTW- I know this video is about Iraq(05 or 06) and the picture was taken in Afghanistan, but the point Stewart makes resonates regardless.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • iammyfathersson
    • 0
      iammyfathersson  
    • iammyfathersson:

      "I see how that has stopped the war America is still in"

      By journalists I was referring to the people covering the war not Stewart. The only reason I posted the video was because his point hit the nail on the head.

      "Maybe he'd like more sacrifices to this cause of stopping the war"

      What a wonderful way to make every other comment you make irrelevant.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I think we need to have the news show the real cost of war, but at the same time protect the privacy of the casualties.

      If people got to see first hand what the true costs are, they would be motivated to march by the millions.

    • 2 years ago
  • lamborghini
  • cafiredancer
    • 0
      cafiredancer  
    • While I appriciate raw journalism, I agree with those who say this was the wrong thing to do. Out of respect for the greaving family....they should have not posted it. I agree with chasingame on this one!

    • 2 years ago
  • funnicus
    • 0
      funnicus [removed]  
    • I thought they were proud to die etc etc. Or was that kill. Kill - Die... same thing. I'm glad the little asshole is dead. Boo hoo, if the little dick's family didn't want the picture to be published, maybe they should have funded their own war. Let's see the pictures of those Afghan families that were bombed from air conditioned comfort in a nevada remote site.

      A brave nation? HAHA! A nation of scared idiots willing to war at every turn. A hypocritical nation willing to kill others for their own illusion of safety. A nation that deserves what it is getting.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • funnicus
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Shame, shame, shame! There are many things the AP could use to make news. Using a single dead Marine to make their point is shameful. If the father asked that his sons photo not be shown, they should honor his request. The family should not have to take legal action, to get compassion. WTF Using a dead Marine against his families wishes is just plain sad! Exploitation!

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Thanks PressCore, well said. There was a way to get the point across in a dignified manner to respect the wishes of the young man's parents, and I think it is a cop out to say their wishes don't matter in this at all. Even torture photos, which I too am for showing blot out faces and do not give names. And how many answering that this picture should be shown were in threads stating Obama was right to not show pictures of torture? I think the main point here is that this young man and all of them should not have had to die in the first place. And you laid out why very clearly.

    • 2 years ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • What would you bet that the BBC would have made the effort to accomplish both goals instead of one or the other ? Truely responsible Journalism would've ommitted all personaly identifiable info about the soldier's identity. They would have blurred his face and not disclosed his name to respond to an appeal for decency & privacy by his family. But they would have carried out their mission which is to shock the couch potatoes from their wanting to put catsup on their burgers while they watched his blood being shed. Animalia Libero has it right when he depicts the
      routine horror of subjecting chicks to the grinder's metal wheels. That's all that young Marine is to Phizer, Monsanto, Dupont, Blackwater,Haliburton and all the other Fascist Corporations who've exploited each and every war for profit since Vietnam. Another
      unit of flesh for their Corporate grinder. Another opportunity for Iraqi, & Afghanistani farmers to hate Americans/allies for U.S.Corporate enslavement which we don't support. Another reason for their Bin Ladens to blindly hate the Western World, and to esasperate them to terrorist acts which many thoughtless Americans blindly react to and fuel the escalation of conflict worse. One look at how badly life in the USA has degraded since 9/11/2000 and the heinous infamy of the Bush regime should wake you. Though I was born in N.Y. I have lived in Texas & Colorado and consider myself a Westerner. And I have come to despise ANY system that routinely accepts that our lives depend on others' deaths. Many
      other anti Vietnam protestors like myself moved to the U.K. of the Netherlands during that milestone conflict.
      My emigration to become a future dual national doesn't mean I hate America. It means I hate the 1984
      idea of war without end, and how it's destroying my country one life at a time.

    • 2 years ago
  • kstein
    • 0
      kstein  
    • PressCore:

      You are right about the BBC, but with their coverage we know more of whats going on. However seeing that boys pictured stirs me deeply, he was so young, my prayers are with his family. It was a shock, a wakeup call, again.

    • 2 years ago
  • kstein
    • 0
      kstein  
    • Hes just a baby! a beautiful baby, there goes transparency, It was the real, horrid, truth pictures given to Churchill, about the atrocities of WW2, that finally convinced us to intervene, the American mainsteam news is not being transparent again. The BBc and the CBN is much better.

    • 2 years ago
  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • Freedom of Press my arse! This picture served no useful purpose. None. The father asked it not be published. Some folks hide under "freedom of press" when all they really want to see is more pictures of blood and gore. We already know this war is meaningless and pointless. Showing the photo only makes some perv get off on it.

    • 2 years ago
  • masterzip
  • MoonLoon
  • masterzip
  • jd1341
    • 0
      jd1341  
    • that maybe so, but the reality is that there probably enough pictures of dying marines that have families that wouldnt refuse to have thier sons picture published. use those.

    • 2 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • MoonLoon
  • Darevalo
  • jd1341
  • kstein
  • AlGores_Uncle
    • 0
      AlGores_Uncle  
    • It stepped on some toes but it glorifies the soldiers death whilst showing the harsh realities of War. Nothing was faked, nothing was altered, this is reality. Whether the family didn't want to show their son dying for whatever reason, it happened. People treat photography in general as this thing that is created by people and while although yes photography can capture only a fraction of the story more clearly than almost and other media source, AP is straight forward news. They report without bias and as a part of that they should publish everything, even the photos of our children dying. You get to then be the judge, thats what news is supposed to be.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • JanforGore
  • Darevalo
    • 0
      Darevalo  
    • freedom of the press in my view.

      i dont think its crossing the line to show how horrible the war is, im sorry for the grieving, because i would hold their stance if it was me in their shoes too.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Darevalo:

      People know the horrors of war just fine. The only way they'd really get to know it is to actually go there. I suppose you think taking citizens to a war torn area so they can get a sense of war would be a great idea.

    • 2 years ago
  • Darevalo
    • 0
      Darevalo  
    • Darevalo:

      people may know it, but they will never understand it.
      a picture of the mess that's going on is an easy way to help people understand.

      i know that war is gruesome, but i can never understand it truly, short of becoming a solider and experiencing it. pictures, videos, and sounds, its all so that we can vicariously be there, to help us understand the turmoil that goes on. without that, its just empty words going into our ears, without any real context.

      you may understand how horrible war is, but not everyone does, they just know its bad, like they know its bad to piss on the toilet seat.

    • 2 years ago
  • ras_menelik
    • 0
      ras_menelik  
    • what Gates did in good good taste today

      Nato has promised a full investigation into an air strike on two fuel tankers that killed up to 90 people in Afghanistan's northern Kunduz province.

      go look at the pictures...

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • ras_menelik:

      "Ras", they were civilians stealing fuel from the stranded tankers. Morons like this kill themselves every day in Nigeria and no global protest is made. Here is a good rule for global citizens,"if the fuel does not belong to you, stay away"!

    • 2 years ago
  • chasingame
    • 0
      chasingame  
    • As most of you have already stated, The AP really did show a laps in judgment by running these pictures. Not necessarily because of the content but because it was against the wishes of the deceased marines family. Ultimately it should be up to them. There are military families that, for their own reasons, would allow or even desire that such photos to be published of their family member. Release them when those situations arise.

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 130
more from Community:

top videos