IRS Literally Taxed Joe Louis To Death

which does a hell of a lot of good for things line roads and defense and medicare.

no the gasoline tax (about 40 cents) that we all pitch in for fuel covers the roads. the military is covered by coperate income tax. the only income tax that was constitutional as deemed by the founding fathers until 1914. That is the tax this article refers to.

incorrect. The gas tax does go towards roads, but substantial amounts of federal dollars go towards highways as well. It's one of the primary ways that the federal government gets states to toe the line on things like drinking ages. set your drinking age to 21 or lose federal highway dollars. Wisconsin for instance wanted the drinking age enough to forgo the funds for several years. They finally relented though because it was just too much money.

What are you doing going over and commenting on 8 month old posts btw?

..and it was your uncle that was head injured not you right? I assume this uncle also gets some sort of disability? You aware of the libertarian view of that?

This mostly shows that you don't know what the word means.

e⋅vil
  /ˈivəl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ee-vuhl] Show IPA
Use evil in a Sentence
See web results for evil
See images of evil
–adjective
1. morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked: evil deeds; an evil life.
2. harmful; injurious: evil laws.
3. characterized or accompanied by misfortune or suffering; unfortunate; disastrous: to be fallen on evil days.
4. due to actual or imputed bad conduct or character: an evil reputation.
5. marked by anger, irritability, irascibility, etc.: He is known for his evil disposition.

No, I used the correct word.

The irs is nothing but a collection agency. They don't make law, and they don't decide what is due. They usually make a pretty good effort to collect in the most decent way possible.

Calling the IRS evil is like calling a toilet greedy.

unimatrix, I would figure someone as intelligent (though as disagreeable) as you would have figured out by now that all this character posts is nonsensical articles that have no business being read by anybody, anywhere, ever.

Ron Paul supporters are like watching cats swat at a laser pointer on the wall.

But what is news is bashing ALL Conservatives and Republicans because of two signs found in a crowd of thousands (or hundreds...whatever your number is). Or Bashing religion or bashing any number of things you love to bash....

you and Jan dictating what News is, is better done by not posting in what you think isn't news.

That's how the community works and disrespecting that is disrespecting the community.

I'm not voicing my opinion on what is and is not news worthy, but this fool does nothing but post Ron Paul spam all day every day. I'm doing my best to tune it out, it's just funny to me.

There is a difference between stating someone is over mentioning something and stating it shouldn't be posted.

My above post was for Uni anyway.

Ah. Disregard.

let's see... he lived close to another 20 years after it stopped and died at an age in line with the average life expectancy for pro athletes at the time.

FAIL

You may not have noticed but this thing is listed in "news" happend 30 years ago involving laws and organization policies that have been inactive for even longer than that. Plus the primary premise is horsepucky. How much more not newsworthy can something be?

holy crap! did you just blame mike for that census guy's murdrer because he loves ron paul???? that's nuts. i haven't read the "fed" article yet, and if it says somewhere in it that the murder watched one too many ron paul articles posted on current, i will come back and appologize profusely. but if not ---OMG! thats just wrong!

I just lost all respect for you bomb.....

how low, how low.....

You can keep hiding honesty and truth from the people, you can try to censor me and have our operations shut down, but we will never give up fighting for what is right. You are wrong on so many levels. The last part of your comment is not only wrong, it is sickening...I lose personal value responding to such childish remarks.

Not specifically, but in as much as he assists in creating the fostering environment, sure. If we compare this to say a Mississippi burning style hate crime, the peacefreedomprospertiy posts would be the KKK leader in another state railing against black voting registration and predicting things like "a coming war", which I believe was one recent article subject.

>"You can keep hiding honesty and truth from the people"<
How would it be possible for me to even do that? All I do is call you out when you attempt to masticate the truth.

>"..you can try to censor me and have our operations shut down,.."<
Who is "our" by the way? I thought you were supposed to be just a single poster like everyone else.
I do occasionally accuse you of unethical and sleazy behavior when I see it. I do that a lot here to a lot of people. I have no capacity at all to shut you down. If you are having those kinds of problems it is because I am right about your behavior and people that do have that kind of ability see it too. I do nothing but point out they exist, as I have done here.

>"The last part of your comment is not only wrong, it is sickening...I lose personal value responding to such childish remarks."<
Yet you do so. sickening yes, I wholly agree. Wrong? Not so much. You choose in many of your little utube slide shows a very specific propaganda style designed to persuade on an emotional level. You demand action, and repress discussion. You are not in any way the only one doing this or even a major offender, but if the entirety of the KKK and Jim Crow system was at fault when someone got lynched, or the right to life movement is at fault when a planned parenthood doctor gets murdered, then yeah. It's your problem.

P.S. it seems this thing came in two parts because the shanklinmike post came in while I was replying to the first post. The ways of internet forums and all that.

yeah, because everyone was listening to you before... No the voices in your head don't count

Just because a few lunatics online and in Congress agree with you doesn't mean you aren't fucking nuts.

Be careful Ares...that could be a description of you.

Sure, let's abolish the fed and the IRS and see what happens to our country.

Lets see:

No more department of defense funding at all. OK, so that means states have to maintain their own militias. Boy that's the dumbest idea ever.

Ares is not the lunatic, in this case.

as if that couldn't be funned in another manner...I don't know...like a flat tax?

Are you serious?!? Because abusive and unconstitutional progressive income taxation ends we will lose our military?!? Our you guys listening to these lies?!? WOW......as if consumption taxation wasn't called for with this purpose in mind. If the IRS and protectionist efforts of the Federal Reserve would be abolished, our economic growth would skyrocket meaning we could tax less and gain more from the raise in overall GDP. To even think that the military industrial complex is going away is asinine and childish.

ROFL "rand paul." I'm very tolerant of typos, being a major offender myself, but you have to admit some are funnier than others.

If it weren't for the IRS we wouldn't have any federal funded anything.

No healthcare for seniors, no social security, certainly no military, etc. etc. etc.

The IRS is there to make sure that no one pays their taxes differently than the rules that have been set out which ALL people must follow.

If it weren't for the IRS, states would have to expend huge amounts of their budgets on auditing lowlifes who try to evade their taxes.

They are simply enforcing the law in order to make our society fair.

When people bitch about the IRS, it's no different than thugs bitching about the police.

The IRS is there to serve and protect.

I am sorry that you made enough money to have to pay taxes, that must be so hard. Boo hoo. Do you want some cheese with that wine?

I've seen this stupid movie.

It could be argued that Stare Decisis has long since ratified the government's power to tax.

First of all, you haven't substantiated ANY of your claims and some of them just don't make sense, like having the IRS being a decentralized system, state by state. How is that cheaper? And please explain to me, with numbers, why the value of the fed doesn't add up to it's cost. Hm? Do you even know how to do that?

The constitution calls for an apportioned tax.

Here is the definition that you seem to have forgotten to look up:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apportioned

It means to allocate proportionally. That hardly excludes a graduated tax system.

More importantly, a flat tax system, in execution is inverse to a graduated system based on income. "Why is that?" you may ask, my economically numb friend. A nice economic concept called the marginal propensity to consume.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/marginal+propensity+to+consume

There is a guy on Wall Street whose income has 3 commas. What do you suppose a person does with that kind of money, hmm? With a billion dollars, you could give yourself all of the most expensive personal effects on earth (car, boat, food) and still have plenty left over.

What does he do with that money? He saves it in real estate, stocks, bonds, whatever. So, he doesn't stimulate the economy. However, someone who earns 7 bucks an hour cleaning toilets and flipping burgers spends all of his money on necessities and uses up his paycheck, in full, just to pay the bills that he can barely meet and he sits well below the poverty line. His MPC is 1. Every dollar he gets is going to directly stimulate economic growth. Mr. Billionaire's MPC is probably closer to .1 if he can even figure out how to spend over $100 million a year. I know I couldn't.

Every dollar that Fatty Fuck Mr. Fat Cat gets taxed improves our economy dramatically.

Let me take this a step further to complete my point:

If we have a flat tax like sales tax of say, 10%. The poor guy's tax rate is 10%, where Mr. Billionaire's tax rate is 1%.

If you are for a flat tax, you are a sheep with a blank slate when it comes to economics. If you loudly proclaim that you or anyone you know would be better off under a flat tax system, you are simply spewing forth a political meme that someone told you to believe without evaluating the impact of such a policy.