Iran admits to 2nd Uranium Enrichment Plant

israel in its 60 yrs of history despite being attacked directly and indirectly by iran has never made a military move towards iran.
further more of the smack talking going on in the region iran has been making enflamitory statements threatening israel since 1980 promising the destruction of israel and the jewish people as well as anything else he can think of to agitate the jewish people(like the holocaust is a myth).
while the only threats israel has made to iran is the present one
not to destroy them
not to kill them
not to rule them
not to conquer them
but to destroy irans nuclear facilities.
take away irans nuke facilities the aggression towards iran goes back to the level it was before alll of this. zero.
irans nuke program is not for defense from israels threats
israels threats are the result of thier nuke facilities

Iran is still playing chicken. Yo, Iran. we invented the game. You gonna frustrate us enough man, we going to unleash Israel, and those dudes are not going to play. They going to do it. These Jews do not appreciate being threatened. They even jumpin up and down to do it an' stop all you talk and tease crap. Man, you 'bout to be mowed down. We here in America, we don't even gotta lose one soldier. We just gotta cut the leash Madjob.
you got that?

ATTENTION ALL WESTERN NATIONS!!!
JUBAL said...
Any attack on Iran would be perceived in the Muslim world as a direct attack on their religion. It would galvanize the lot of them and then you will have real terror on your hands. They will all unite to retaliate and defend themselves. Israel will then be wiped off the face of the map along with many western nations who defend her.
Yo, Jubal, all the Muslim nations all together, yes, combined all together, might have a huge total of loads of anger, bitterness, hate and curses and about four nuclear bombs. Try wiping out the Western nations which have more than seventeen thousand bombs and many of the newest ones will not even leave the old radiation clouds, boy. Those same Western nations which you threaten, are losing patience each day as they read the headlines and smaller articles.
So why not call it what it really is?
This is a religious war in your eyes.
You are threatening the Western nations with a religious war. Please give them a few minutes to cry and run before you release all those new attacks. Please, it's not fair to just wipe them all out. They need time to pray and buy groceries.

We are all aware of the purposeful long warning time Iran has had. Of course, since 2006 when they got their first warning to not build a nuclear plant to disguise a bomb, until today, they have been deliberately been given at least three years extra to develop their research and production while the U.N. continues to say things like, "Please stop," or, "Stop, pretty please, or, You better stop," and other silly phrases which we all know mean nothing and accomplished nothing.
Why did Mr. Obama not even mention George Bush who is the hero, who was the first one to open his mouth unashamedly to Iran?
Mr. Obama has not even acknowledged him.
Mr. Obama only criticizes Mr. Bush. He even hugs Mr. Chavez who insulted our president.

Not telling the truth really makes bad for them , lying
makes it worst & this is all they do i am sorry to say !

Why do the American people have to be beasts of burden for the world?

This is a hinge point in history. This is either George Bush letting India and Pakistan get the bomb or Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crises or something entirely different but its significance is evident. This is certainly harrowing but no one can deny it is historical.

"I hope Israel unfucks this situation before we have to."

And why should we?

"So, Ahmadinjad goes on insulting, tesing, warning, threatening and provoking, but Israel must not act preempively. They should wait for a few hundred thousand to be burned?"

Remember kids. Don't talk shit about Israel, or they'll nuke you.

Seriously, Ahmadinjad has little power, and the Supreme Leader of Iran opposes attacking Israel, IIRC.

"Stand up and be a man. When a man comes to your house and bangs on your door for a few years and threatens your children, you're going to wait until he gets your kids and then you will react?"

Killing people over some threats and bullshitting isn't being a man. And your situation isn't an allegory to this situation.

The U.S.A. invented Nuclear Warfare, and remains the only nation to use such horrific force.

The only way we can protect ourselves and the Earth is by disarming our own nukes.

We should shoot them all directly at the sun, along with our nuclear waste.

The concept of military action because of POTENTIAL nuclear capabilities is corporate media static.

War is big business.

If I lived next to Israhell I would be building the biggest Nukes I could.

You can't bring about peace with nuclear arms.

"some country's don't have the credibility to have nuclear arms."

If you can think of a country with the credibility to possess nuclear weapons I'd like to hear it.

after the last 8 years, the world does not need another arms race, one particularly based on Religion. Ideology was one thing, but theological radicalism is insane. most of Iran's population is under 30 and are more liberal, capable of understanding and capitulating for the "zero-sum" gain.

unfortunately for everyone, (1) nukes create a lot of collateral damage, (2) Iran and Israel have a commonality where in they both have supremacist monotheistic theocratic origins.

the effects of "the great war to end all wars" and the industrial military complex and application of "game-theory" economics to free market global capitalism.

http://web.mit.edu/mitir/2009/online/mossadegh.htm

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/ww1.html

okey people can we just all ask one another way do we feel the need to make nuclear weapons or bombs.....

Bomb it.

http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jir/jir041102_1_n.shtm...

"The IRGC leadership is widely viewed in Iran to be employing the nuclear stand-off as a vehicle to encroach further into the political sphere. As the constitution prohibits serving IRGC staff from running for office, a number of retired officials from its ranks have recently been appointed to senior positions or elected to the Majlis. There has even been speculation that IRGC could field its own candidate for the 2005 presidential elections. Further political influence, combined with its full control over Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, could make the IRGC the most formidable obstacle to a transformation of Iran's foreign policy."

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE58O45720090925

"Obama and Medvedev agreed on Wednesday that serious additional sanctions had to be considered if Iran did not respond to proposals to end the nuclear standoff."

IMO, Obama is handling this with great diplomacy. he knew the missile defense shield over eastern Europe was an easy card to trade for Russia's support in convincing Iran that it is heading in the wrong direction. Unfortunately, i think nukes have become a new golden calf for future emerging economies and societies. North Korea needs to be made an example of, through tougher indefinite sanctions, in order to prove that the security nukes provide is also a poor trade for prosperity.

No pre-emptive war!

It needs to be taken out before it can produce enough material needed to make any nuclear device! Enough Said!

Israel has nuclear weapons.I would trust Iran before Israel.Renenber the USS LIberty?

Now their intentions are clear and we no longer have to listen to the sniveling about the Iranians wanting only nuclear power.

The U.N. is not trying to make Iran get rid of their plant, they just want to know what they are planning to do with potentially catastrophic weapons. As long as everyone has there cards on the table its a fair game.

How do you hide a whole facility? If i can spot my house on Google earth, where you still can't get decent cell reception, how can Iran hide a whole nuclear facility? Seems like the UN dropped the ball a bit

How is that we, and others, are allowed to have nuclear weapons, and some are not? If they have to get rid of their nuke potential, shouldn't we have to get rid of ours?

"The size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful (nuclear) program," impotent Obama said, and further raises concerns that Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon.

New York Times: PITTSBURGH — President Obama and leaders of Britain and France accused Iran on Friday of building a secret underground plant to manufacture nuclear fuel, saying the country has hidden the covert operation from international weapons inspectors for years.

Appearing before reporters in Pittsburgh, Mr. Obama said that the Iranian nuclear program “represents a direct challenge to the basic foundation of the nonproliferation regime.” French President Nicholas Sarkozy, appearing beside Mr. Obama, said that Iran had deadline of two months to comply with international demands or face increased sanctions.

“The level of deception by the Iranian government, and the scale of what we believe is the breach of international commitments, will shock and anger the entire international community,” British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said, standing on the other side of Mr. Obama. “The international community has no choice today but to draw a line in the sand.”

A line in the sand? More deadlines. This is pathetic. How dare the "leaders" of the free world leave free people at the mercy of Islamic jihad with nukes?

Thomas Sowell said last month:

He is heading this country toward disaster on many fronts, including a nuclear Iran, which has every prospect of being an irretrievable disaster of almost unimaginable magnitude. We cannot put that genie back in the bottle — and neither can generations yet unborn. They may yet curse us all for leaving them hostages to nuclear terror.

It's too late for sanctions, and they won't even do that. We are way out of time for sanctions.

And so we must ask ourselves, will Netanyahu, the true leader of the free world, save it (and then get eviscerated for it)?

I can almost hear the squeaky marker drawings and being loaded on the war planes right now..

i don't want nuclear proliferation by any means but it is an untenable position to say "you can't have that but I won't give up mine until every one gives theirs up." Mexican standoff. No one ever comes out on top. Maybe time for a fresh approach...Of course Iran has very little integrity due to stunts like this.

kinda shady hiding a second enrichment plant from the U.N.

shady indeed.