Community | September 30, 2009 | 100 comments

Michael Moore tells Democrats: 'Find your spine' on health care

Image
WakeUpPeople
Sans video camera, filmmaker Michael Moore on Tuesday turned his megaphone on the current health care system and those Blue Dog Democrats he claims are "dogging" the health care debate.

Moore, an advocate of a single-payer, government-run health care system, called the current setup "cruel," and said that two-thirds of Americans support a single-payer system and would punish those Democrats who steer the conversation away from that option.

"To the Democrats in Congress," Moore said, "find your spine. Read the polls. And see us coming."

The contentious documentarian spoke at the Washington offices of Public Citizen, a non-profit consumer advocacy group. Moore has a new film called "Capitalism: A Love Story" slated for release Friday, and says he's using the media attention to push for single-payer health care.

When asked why the single-payer option hasn't won much support in the health care debate in Washington, Moore said Democrats "haven't felt the heat."

Moore also criticized liberal voters, who he said lacked the motivation of Republicans and "wouldn't get up at 6 a.m." like their conservative counterparts.

"There's a lot of anger out there that's simmering beneath the surface," said Moore, adding that the Democrats haven't tapped that fury.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   Progressive America,   Current Democrats,   3 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics US News Democrats Health Care Reform 1 more
  3.     
    |

100 comments // Michael Moore tells Democrats: 'Find your spine' on health care

  • CritiqalPete
  • Abraham99
  • RFIDemocracy
  • Abraham99
    • 0
      Abraham99  
    • Michael Moore disguises himself all the time. He tries so hard to look like a homeless dude who just about has enough money to go to the all his appearances by bus.
      He purposely dresses to look like just a regular guy.
      He is however very wealthy of course. he has homes in a few places. He has a limo and a driver and millions invested in himself and his properties.
      He screams about capitalism and guys like Mr. Obama just love what he's saying. Meanwhile, the guys who love what he's saying are people with money that they got because of capitalism.
      This is like going to church with fakers who pray and act religious only in church. When they get out of church or synagogue or mosque, they go back to the same nonsense all over again.
      To the public, it's "Down with capitalism."
      In private it's. "I'm going to make as much money as I possibly can."

    • 2 years ago
  • randomly
    • 0
      randomly  
    • Abraham99:

      how ignorant are you? if he is rich and arguing against his own tax bracket, how does that invalidate his argument for the majority of the country? so someone who has made money (hey this is capitalism!) exposing the plight of those with no money decides to speak up for those without it, and then you criticize him. way to go. seriously, superb job.

      who fucking cares how he looks, or even how much he makes, as long as he is rocking the boat against you assholes who claim that everything is fine and that we can continue to ignore the vast majority of people who can't afford to LIVE let alone pursue happiness and health at the expense of a minority of rich pricks.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • How does one "loose weight"? By setting a dumbell free?

      loose
      (ls)
      adj. loos·er, loos·est
      1. Not fastened, restrained, or contained: loose bricks.
      2. Not taut, fixed, or rigid: a loose anchor line; a loose chair leg.
      3. Free from confinement or imprisonment; unfettered: criminals loose in the neighborhood; dogs that are loose on the streets.
      4. Not tight-fitting or tightly fitted: loose shoes.
      5. Not bound, bundled, stapled, or gathered together: loose papers.
      6. Not compact or dense in arrangement or structure: loose gravel.
      7. Lacking a sense of restraint or responsibility; idle: loose talk.
      8. Not formal; relaxed: a loose atmosphere at the club.
      9. Lacking conventional moral restraint in sexual behavior.
      10. Not literal or exact: a loose translation.
      11. Characterized by a free movement of fluids in the body: a loose cough; loose bowels.
      adv.
      In a loose manner.
      v. loosed, loos·ing, loos·es
      v.tr.
      1. To let loose; release: loosed the dogs.
      2. To make loose; undo: loosed his belt.
      3. To cast loose; detach: hikers loosing their packs at camp.
      4. To let fly; discharge: loosed an arrow.
      5. To release pressure or obligation from; absolve: loosed her from the responsibility.
      6. To make less strict; relax: a leader's strong authority that was loosed by easy times.
      v.intr.
      1. To become loose.
      2. To discharge a missile; fire.
      Idiom:
      on the loose
      1. At large; free.
      2. Acting in an uninhibited fashion.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • You know what he needs to do?

      Lose weight to find his.

      Edit: I had to do it because someone had a reading problem with a mistake. So in case you're wondering I had to remove an extra O.

      Look at that I can make a mistake. Looks like I'm the only one that can.

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • J_Jammer:

      Ad hominems. Run out of live ammo? That's all you got, huh? He's fat. I hate Michael Moore. Because, because, he, he...he is a big fat fatty.

      Pretty cheap shot, even for Jammer.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      That's not all I got, but that's all he's worth.

      He doesn't look at anything but his greed. After watching Sicko and him going to Cuba in that pretentious manner....I don't have any respect for any thing that falls out of that way too open mind his.

      That's how the fat boy rolls.

      I don't hate him. I feel sorry for him and anyone that thinks he's smart.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • J_Jammer:

      "I don't hate him. I feel sorry for him and anyone that thinks he's smart."

      Anyone else notice Jammer just inadvertently demonstrated the very epitome of irony?

      You are one piece of work, Jammer.
      Did you get beat up in school much for being an asshole?
      I'm guessing 'yeah'. or perhaps it's a more recently acquired trait.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      OHNOSE you don't like it when someone makes fun of your hero?

      Sorry. Look how you treat anyone you don't like...Rush, Beck...whatever Republican you want to wrongfully harpoon with your hate.

      And yet you have a problem with me calling someone exactly what they are....fat.

      There's NO denying that one, and you haven't have you? No. You try to turn this around on me instead of disproving the comment of him being fat.

      Kind of hard when there's blatant evidence against you. You don't have much room to spin or wiggle like you normally do.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • J_Jammer:

      As Reagan would say, 'There you go again, Jammer'.

      "OHNOSE you don't like it when someone makes fun of your hero?"

      Thanks for putting those words in my mouth there, Tex. Words that I neither spoke nor even implied.

      Let's review, shall we?

      Jammer: "I don't hate him. I feel sorry for him and anyone that thinks he's smart."

      RFID: "Anyone else notice Jammer just inadvertently demonstrated the very epitome of irony?"

      Feel free to parse my words carefully and indicate how I expressed my displeasure. As usual, Jammer misses the point. Copy and paste the entire post if you like.

      Once again, Jammer attampts to apply the straw man argument.
      FAIL

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      You use every single debating cliche you can pull out of your little notebook and then pretend you made a point.

      The problem, though, is that you have posted replies to every single person who has said something negative about the fat American and you're trying to brashly convince people that you do not like him like even if it's not like hero (my exaggeration of course).

      I have replied to many in many threads and have been the main poster in them, but at least I can admit what I'm doing. You're afraid to admit it?

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • J_Jammer:

      "The problem, though, is that you have posted replies to every single person who has said something negative about the fat American and you're trying to brashly convince people that you do not like him like even if it's not like hero (my exaggeration of course)."

      Again with the bullshit, Tex. Show me where I am, in your words, "trying to brashly convince people that you do not like him".

      Note: I disregarded the latter part of the 'sentence', which was incomprehensible. You can edit that now. What have you got to 'loose'.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
  • J_Jammer
  • randomly
    • 0
      randomly  
    • J_Jammer:

      "The problem, though, is that you have posted replies to every single person who has said something negative about the fat American and you're trying to brashly convince people that you do not like him like even if it's not like hero (my exaggeration of course)."

      this is really pathetic. your own comments about him being fat are a perfect example. the negative things people are saying about him here are completely irrelevant.

      how does him being fat refute any of his arguments? sure it's a fact, but a fact that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO with the discussion. it seems like you can't come up with a rational, logical response to moore's positions so you resort to childish insults.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • Hey, has anyone ever heard of "pothole politics". These Congressmen, they don't answer to Michael Moore, Michael Moore doesn't put them in office. If they vote one way and their constituency says we wanted you to vote the other way and they say but Michael Moore said I should vote this way, how do you think that is going to fly. They will get tossed out in a heartbeat. Congress is not about party once you're elected, it's about incumbancy, keeping the seat you have.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • JohnA:

      Not sure what kind of point you attempting to make but...

      "If they vote one way and their constituency says we wanted you to vote the other way and they say but Michael Moore said I should vote this way, how do you think that is going to fly."

      What Moore is doing is not telling people how to vote but reminding them about what once made America great. An inclusive society where all are created and treated equally and the rule of law applies equally to everyone, government of the people, for the people, by the people.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • What Michael has to say is exactly what is called for to push the party in the right direction. Keep pushing buddy it's high time we get this kind of attention and just maybe the dems will get it.

    • 2 years ago
  • RyanM4
    • 0
      RyanM4  
    • I completely agree. As hard as it is for me to make a decision on anything, even cereal, I think that the people in control need to find their position and make the change.

    • 2 years ago
  • WakeUpPeople
  • JohnA
  • WakeUpPeople
  • RFIDemocracy
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • The Blue Dogs he is calling out are reading polls, polls of their constituents who voted them in to, and can vote them out of, office. See Mike, it may be foreign to you, being a Canadian and all, but here in America, next year when those Blue Dogs run for re-election, your opinion don't mean shit. It's the opinion of the people in their district and their state that keeps them in office. It's called representative democracy. We vote for you to vote the way we want you to or else we will vote you out and find someone who will. Works pretty well, I'm hoping the DNC takes it up.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • JohnA:

      "See Mike, it may be foreign to you, being a Canadian and all, but here in America, next year when those Blue Dogs run for re-election, your opinion don't mean shit."

      Wanna bet? I smell another blockbuster. And the press is behind this movie, as it should be since all his movies are excellent, bar none.
      * Time: 'Moore's Magnum Opus'
      * Bloomberg: 'Scathing, Effective and Hilarious'
      * AP: 'Warmly Received'
      * USA Today: 'Quintessential Moore'
      * Los Angeles Times: 'Classic'
      * Variety: 'One of His Best Films'
      * New York Times: 'Moving Beyond Words'
      * The Independent: 'Rousing and Entertaining'
      * Guardian: 'Tumultuous Applause'
      * Michael's Washington Post Webchat
      * CapitalismALoveStory.com
      * Rolling Stone: 'Fireball of a Movie Could Change Your Life'

      Oh deary, that could work in his favor.
      I guess that means it's your opinion that 'don't mean shit'.

    • 2 years ago
  • randomly
  • randomly
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • JohnA:

      clayjj05
      "You just listed some of the most liberal publications in america."

      Did I? The Guardian is UK last I checked. Which is even worse for you because that means Moore is receiving international critical acclaim as opposed to just universal national acclaim

      "only stoners and homosexuals read the rolling stone for news"
      News? When did movie reviews become 'news'?

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • JohnA:

      clayjj05

      More reviews from more of the 'most liberal' publications in America

      Los Angeles Times:
      "It is Moore at his most passionate, most personal and most political, and that is something not to be missed."

      Minneapolis Star Tribune:
      "'Capitalism' is a Molotov cocktail thrown straight at the heart of the New York Stock Exchange. The impact is spectacular."

      MacLeans:
      'Capitalism: A Love Story' may be the best film of his career."

      "Capitalism" earned more than Mike's last film, "Sicko," did on its opening weekend and is on track to be one of the top 5 grossing documentaries of all time (which will give Mike 4 of the top 7 all-time docs!).
      "Capitalism" remains the highest grossing per-screen average for any film in limited release in 2009.

    • 2 years ago
  • acontradiction
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • acontradiction:

      How about nothing? Maybe you were unaware of his special offer. It's running for free in several major centers. I guess that's the opposite of your spurious accusation, right?
      Here, I'll say it for you. "Wow, I didn't realize I was such an asshole".

    • 2 years ago
  • clayjj05
  • RFIDemocracy
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      "another thing it bashes on capitalism, and than uses it to make millions of dollars to buy hoe hoes that hes dips in crisco."

      You have more than a passing interest in crisco, it appears.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • clayjj05:

      It is true. All he cares about is making money.

      That's why he stated that he'd quit making documentaries because they don't work and make an action film.

      If he believed half of what he put in his films he wouldn't quit so easily.

    • 2 years ago
  • randomly
    • 0
      randomly  
    • clayjj05:

      if all he's concerned about is making money, don't you think it would be in his best interest to divert attention AWAY from the issues he continually raises in his documentaries?

      your argument makes no logical sense. do you people even think about what you're spouting before you do it?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      "The moment you state you're going to quit...you already did."

      Wow. I'm relieved then because he did not make such a statement.

      **"I'm saying it's a possibility, yeah," Moore said in an interview at the Toronto International Film Festival, where "Capitalism" played in advance of its limited release in theaters Sept. 23 and nationwide rollout Oct. 2.

      "I've done this for 20 years. I started out by warning people about General Motors, and my whole career has been trying to say the emperor has no clothes here, and we better do something about it," Moore said. "I've been having to sort of knock my head against the wall here for 20 years saying these things.

      "Two years ago, I tried to get the health-care debate going, and it did eventually, and now where are we? We may not even have it. What am I supposed to do at a certain point?"**

      When you are as myopic as Jammer, it's easy to translate "I'm saying it's a possibility, yeah" into "I already quit, I am cleaning out my desk?"
      They say even a stopped clock is right twice a day, Jammer. Hang in there, it's sure to happen to you eventually.
      If you post a couple of hundred more comments on this Michael Moore story, one of them is bound to be accurate.

      You certainly seem concerned, given the overwhelming volume of your posts. MM gets under your skin, n'est pas?

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      "It is true. All he cares about is making money."

      Only the Jammer knows what lurks in the hearts of men.
      God reads Michael Moores thoughts and tells Jammer what he thinks.
      Presto.
      Sweeping proclamation revealing Michael Moore's private thoughts.

    • 2 years ago
  • pakazak
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • clayjj05:

      I don't have to post more to be accurate when I already am.

      You are just defending him blindly. Unless you are willing to state what is wrong with him....otherwise why should anyone trust what you have to say? So far all you do is justify everything he does. He could assassinate the President and you'd defend his actions as great for America.

      Exaggeration of course, but you don't seem to have one truthful thing to say about him. No one is perfect and if you can't point out someone's flaws as well as their attributes then you're doing a whole lot of lying.

      He can't so possibility and still be full fledged person on what he believes. Sorry...one ounce of quit..is a quitter. All it takes is a single thought and it snowballs into quitting and the quitting happens before someone says they quit. They already mentally decided to do so before the words escape their mouth.

      And as for knowing what he's thinking, looks like you do or you wouldn't feel the need to defend him....you're not him so you defending him is you pretending to know what he's thinking.

      Nice try, but you continue to screw up and it's like a clown when they are purposely trying to make people laugh....except you think you're making excellent points.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      "You are just defending him blindly."
      Am I? How did you arrive at that 'conclusion'?

      "He could assassinate the President and you'd defend his actions as great for America."
      There's another brilliant statement.

      "Exaggeration of course, but you don't seem to have one truthful thing to say about him."

      Really? Like? Of course your caveat 'seems' is something of an out, which makes your comment subjective as opposed to factual.

      "He can't so possibility and still be full fledged person on what he believes. Sorry...one ounce of quit..is a quitter. All it takes is a single thought and it snowballs into quitting and the quitting happens before someone says they quit. They already mentally decided to do so before the words escape their mouth."

      You are flailing. And failing.

      "He can't so possibility and still be full fledged person on what he believes."

      Is that so? Do verify. 100% subjective again.

      "And as for knowing what he's thinking, looks like you do or you wouldn't feel the need to defend him....you're not him so you defending him is you pretending to know what he's thinking."

      Unlike yourself, I never claimed to know what Michael Moore, nor anyone else, is thinking.
      I appreciate his films and I have said so.
      Since every single one of them has earned universal critical acclaim and enormous box office success, it's possible I may even be correct.

      "Nice try, but you continue to screw up and it's like a clown when they are purposely trying to make people laugh....except you think you're making excellent points."

      Projection, Bilbo. Projection.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      Jammer:

      **Moore then warned that if Obama did not turn things around fairly rapidly, "a year from now, the next movie may be about him".

      Michael Moore discusses tentative plans for his next film. I guess that's what quitters do. Talk about their next project.
      Talk about making a mountain out of an obscure, throwaway comment in an interview molehill.

      Keep 'em coming. you are easy prey.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      "Not a single comment about what he's done wrong?"

      What do you want? He ate too many cheetos? He drives a minivan? I hate that hat?

      "So you do think he's perfect."
      Only religious zealots believe in perfection. I do not. nobody is perfect, no exceptions.

      "As for the Obama thing...he doesn't attack democrats as a whole, so he's a fake until it actually happens."

      He doesn't attack Republicans as a whole., so why should he attack Democrats as a whole. They are not monolithic, they are individuals. Not every republican is an asshole, though the Chuck Hagels are getting out of the business in droves. Conversely, not every democrat is an asshole, though the party is in poor shape.

      Frankly, I don't give a shit what the targets of Moore's films choose for party affiliation. It's entirely irrelevant.

      I know you seek to edit from your mind what you don't want to see but I feel it's incumbent upon me to point to the line in the article that says:
      "To the Democrats in Congress," Moore said, "find your spine. Read the polls. And see us coming."

      Not sure how anyone, aside from yourself, of course, could read that sentence and make the claim that Moore doesn't threaten to target Democrats, only Obama.

      There is an entire industry sprouted up who's focus is to destroy Michael Moore. But he just keeps getting more popular and more successful.

      I could see how that would rankle you, as an *apparent devoted hater of all things liberal.

      *caveat

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • clayjj05:

      Your last sentence is a lie and you said it anyway knowingly.

      And you still didn't say what is wrong with him therefore you praise is nose shoving up butt-ish.

      but continue, I'm sure he'll thank you personally.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      Jammies
      "Your last sentence is a lie and you said it anyway knowingly. "

      Really? Care to read it again before you weep? It's still there *unedited*, unlike your little phoenetic faux pas, which you 'fixed'.

      "And you still didn't say what is wrong with him therefore you praise is nose shoving up butt-ish."

      Besides the above being a false statement, I have never inserted my nose up Mike's, nor anyone's butt and hope I never do. I'd prefer to experience that vicariously through some of your own personal anecdotes and campfire confessions.

      But back to the point.
      I clearly responded to your stupid strawman question, which you formed around the false premise that I 'think Michael Moore is perfect', wholly extrapolated either striaght from the ether or the dank recesses of your butt.
      To underscore the aforementioned remark, I invite you to quote my post where I said anything even remotely resembling I 'think Michael Moore is perfect'.

      My direct answer to your deficient question was, quote, "What do you want? He ate too many cheetos? He drives a minivan? I hate that hat?"

      Had you scrolled upthread, I wouldn't have had to point that out.
      Anyhoo... Still waiting for your claim to be verified based on anything I said. But thanks for putting words in my mouth just the same.

      Which brings me to my next observation: Your pathological imperative to have the last word under any circumstances, as though by boring your debating opponent and any hapless observers to death with moronic ad hominems and projection and I-know-you-are-but-what-am-Is and straight up persistence, along with 24/7 support, you have somehow vanquished those that would mock your profound and insufferable emotional immaturity and your terminal narcissism.

      Exhibit 1: 'You know what he needs to do? Lose weight to find his.'
      -Jammer

      Exhibit 2: That's not all I got, but that's all he's worth.
      -Jammer
      (Whispering...thats all he's got)
      Exhibit 3: You've stated nothing.
      -Jammer
      (False, I stated plenty; see for yourself upthread)
      Exhibit 4: (personal fave) I don't have to post more to be accurate when I already am.
      (ie: dead wrong, itself technically 'accurate' in a way)

      While you may believe incessant, continuous crowing and bloviating 24/7 constitutes making some kind of a point; in my world, your little wiener-dog won't hunt.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • clayjj05:

      You're one of those people that use strawman comment so that you don't have to answer a fairly simple question.

      You stated that he wasn't perfect.

      Now all you have to do is state why.

      If you can't....then why did you state he isn't perfect if you don't have a reason as to why?

      You can't take the spotlight. You like to have other people in it you can't explain anything you believe without trying to insult others.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      Sigh...
      OK, I just re-read the entire tedious thread and the *FIRST* time this question came up when when it was spewed forth from your own gaping maw.

      To wit: "You are just defending him blindly. Unless you are willing to state what is wrong with him....otherwise why should anyone trust what you have to say? So far all you do is justify everything he does. He could assassinate the President and you'd defend his actions as great for America."

      You, Jammer, --demanded-- that I state 'what's wrong with MM'. I said nothing of the sort nor did I even come anywhere close to saying 'Michael moore is not perfect (but I'm not telling you why) or whatever the fuck your specious claim is.
      You are full of shit.
      ...and this myth is **BUSTED**

      PS: Do go back and review the entire thread as I did.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
  • J_Jammer
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • Image
    • clayjj05:

      You'd be qualified to make that judgment better than me, I suspect.
      As an atheist, I don't do 'perfect' and I don't worship celebrities, politician's or gods.

      I think you stated it 'perfectly' when you submitted in your subsequently self-edited post:

      "You know what he needs to do?
      Lose weight to find his.
      Edit: I had to do it because someone had a reading problem with a mistake. So in case you're wondering I had to remove an extra O.
      Look at that I can make a mistake. Looks like I'm the only one that can."

      So, yeah. He's fat. Wow. Anything else?

      Personnaly, I look forward to viewing what was last weekend's top-grossing film in America, Capitalism, A Love Story.
      I'm sure you do, too.
      You've seen all of MM films, right?
      I guess you must have since you appear to be something of a Michael Moore expert, having posted 29 comments on this page alone. Either that or he gets under your skin, which is the whole idea.
      Hmmm, wonder which it is?

      BTW-Rotten Tomatoes rates Capitalism at 73%.
      Overwhelmingly positive reviews and box soaring office receipts. Sucks to be you.

      (I need to consult with your pal clayjj05 to find out if "only stoners and homosexuals read Rotten Tomatoes for news")

      See you at the awards.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Image
    • clayjj05:

      It made $4 Million dollars for the fat man that doesn't like to make money.

      Zombieland made 25$ With 89% on Rottentomatoes. OMG they must believe Zombies are real.

      If you can't answer the simple question just say you can't answer it. Don't drag this out longer than necessary just to save face.

      Oh and if you didn't catch it---Zombieland was number one. The Re-release of Toy Story I and II in 3D beat them at number 3. Drew Barrymore directed Whip it came in before your fat man's movie....and made more money.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • clayjj05:

      "It made $4 Million dollars for the fat man that doesn't like to make money."
      $4,849,067, 5 million in my world, not 4.

      "Zombieland made 25$ With 89% on Rottentomatoes."
      My error, I misread.
      Happy that Americans think zombies are still cool. I like chainsaws, too.

      What was that question you demanded I answer?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Manuel_Trujillo
    • 0
      Manuel_Trujillo  
    • God, I hope the Dems do come together on SO many issues.

      I really do wonder if the victory of Democratic control will end in 2012.

      I see the Republicans uniting behind a scary agenda, and I see the Dems totally divided.

      I really think President Obama is trying to change so many things in a positive way, and now the Republicans are being successful at dividing the moderates!

      Democrats must stay united if they expect to hold on to the House, and Senate... and the Presidency even!

      Although we may laugh off the Tea-Partiers, they are gaining momentum, and spreading propaganda. I believe they will sway enough ignorant people to win some seats next year.

    • 2 years ago
  • MizPiz
    • 0
      MizPiz  
    • The Republicans may be complete dumbasses and be completely corrupt, but at least they don't care about getting EVERYONE on their side. IMO, I think Obama should say (verbatim), "Fuck the tea-baggers, birthers, neo-cons, and all others who oppose our bill, we run this shit."

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • Image
    • MizPiz:

      I think they are finally moving in that direction as of today.

      **In another sign that the Obama administration is increasingly willing to take on its media critics directly, the White House blog has published a comparison of Fox News “rhetoric” versus “reality” on the issue of President Obama’s support for Chicago’s Olympic bid.

      The statement went so far as to use the expression “Fox lies.”

    • 2 years ago
  • junknira
    • 0
      junknira  
    • ugh..don't understand all the hate against moore..while he's using his 'millions' to educate..whatever.. let's keep to the point and not name call..cause it's so last wednesday.

      moore is calling folks out..what happened to obama's promise of single payer? he's just another puppet for the corporations .. they throw us a few bones to distract from business as usual

      just take a minute to learn what the 'public option' is really about..cause it aint about health care for all

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
  • Abraham99
    • 0
      Abraham99  
    • Moore should put that plastic glove over his head and body so he can have an improved image. The stuffed squirrel look is so last Wednesday.
      Then, he'll be able to socialize with higher humans than now, and learn what else is bad and wrong and negative so he can exploit the fault, and make a few million more, while yelling that capitalism is bad.

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • Abraham99:

      "Then, he'll be able to socialize with higher humans than now, and learn what else is bad and wrong and negative so he can exploit the fault, and make a few million more, while yelling that capitalism is bad."

      Perhaps you are having difficulty distinguishing the difference between honest personal success (which Moore has enjoyed tons of, with an emphasis on 'honest') and flogging sub-prime mortgages and credit default swaps. You really tend to miss the point of most discussions, don't you?

    • 2 years ago
  • FishaHouse777
    • 0
      FishaHouse777  
    • Not so much spineless but just slow to react. Democrats in office need to be more aggressive with trying to push this health care bill through and getting the american people to back them up or else this all will be a giant fail.

    • 2 years ago
  • telcod
    • 0
      telcod  
    • Yeah give me that old time capitalism in health care. Love my HMO. I get a woodie just thinking about my health care provider. I just loved getting my premium tripled back in 2003 when my employers portion stayed flat. And now I get to pay for the greedy HMO over building on our backs thinking the bubble would last forever. Lost a a lot of premiums to the ressession, make that depression, and all those jobs lost.

      Well, my significant other, just lost her house after 24 years because of sleaze bag lawyer. She just filed bankruptcy and is starting to loose her religion.

      She does feel grateful that she has a job. Since when did having a lousy, shitty job become a point to rejoice upon? We have become a nation of beggars and have show our proclivity to cowardice.

      Michael Moore just scratches the surface because he has to dumb it down for you all. Yeah, he ain;t pretty to look at like who? Wolf Blitzer or those other media whores.

      Listen to Lewis Black on health-care. I was really taken back when he reminded me that letting the government run things might not be so bad, if we just remembered that we were the government. But they brainwashed that out of heads as well. Time to take the Democrats and Republicans out on the lawn and have our own little French revolution. The French politicians don't pull this shit on their people. They remember.

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • I would submit that Democrats are a bit harder to "herd" because they tend to have opinions based on independent analysis of the issues. In other words, they tend to read.

      I have watched many, many party caucuses. The difference is like the difference between night and day. The Republican legislators walk into the meeting and sit down. As the discussion begins, it is clear within the first 10 minutes that most of them have not read the legislation being discussed or even been briefed on it by their staffs (or they were briefed but didn't pay attention). The party leadership tells them how they want the vote to go, the legislators make the proper notations on their lists of bills, and they walk out.

      The Democratic caucuses last three times as long. They have to discuss the most critical bills first because they often run out of time. Just about everybody has read the bills -- or at least the portions that pertain to their constituencies. Everybody has an opinion, and everybody feels their opinion is of critical importance. The leadership tells the group how they need the vote to go, and then they rest their heads on the podium and pray to God the group heard and understood the need for a united stand.

      I know which model best represents my vision of democracy, but it isn't necessarily the best model for cynical party politics in which the scorecard is Rs versus Ds rather than "Passing Legislation that Best Serves the Interests of the American People."

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • cztheday
  • BKsaysAction
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      I am not a member of any organized party — I am a Democrat.

      * Ch. 9 "Rogers was a lifelong Democrat but he studiously avoided partisanship. He contributed to the Democratic campaign funds, but at the same time he frequently appeared on benefit programs to raise money for the Republican treasury. Republican leaders sought his counsel in their campaigns as often as did the Democrats." ~ P. J. O'Brien

      --------------------------------------

      You may quote and like people's quotes, but you should use them right and correctly and not as weapons of destruction when the person that said it wasn't nearly as terrible.

      None of you have done what he has done. Using his quote to glow and gloat is disgraceful to the quote and it's actual intention.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      Yes you did.

      Because he may have claimed to be part of one party for their standards (AT THAT TIME....not now he wouldn't be) but he did NOT constantly degrade any side.

      You cannot use that quote if you degraded the other side with snide comments or attacks.

      And you have.

      So, yes you used it the way I said.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • cztheday:

      Utter nonsense, JJ. The words in the quote are perfectly applicable today. You are making a mountain out of a mini-molehill, and are constantly guilty of what you accuse me of doing. Get a life.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • cztheday:

      No I did not misuse that quote, neither did I agress anyone. You don't know me nor are you a telepath, yet you claim to know better than me in what spirit I posted that quote whose words are as ad hoc today as they were when they were first proffered, even if the context has changed. You are being silly, at best.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      No they are not.

      You didn't even ready why it was uttered. Because if you did you would see your folly.

      And I have not stated anything about you as a whole, just about your use of a quote...which was poorly used and that is not just silly, that's intellectually sad.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • cztheday:

      "You didn't even ready"???

      I know a great deal about Will Rogers, his bipartisanship and his many jokes. I find this quote to be applicable today, and to have been applicable constantly since he made that statement. You are nit-picking for the sake of nit-picking and because you crave undeserved attention.

      Come, let me gnaw your fingernails that I may absorb and lose myself in the wise and gritty detritus that is you.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      Yes read, ready -- you didn't do one and you aren't the other.

      It's not nitpicking.

      If you knew of him then you should have known who said the quote and stated o in the first post. Beside the point.....it is not applicable today. You do not represent that quote in anything that you state on this site and using means you're using it wrong. Neither does the CZ.

      And you're not doing very well with your not insulting clause that you decided to agree with in another thread.

      That's why I posted about how it was a joke who agreed with said statements.

      Again proving you quote many things but you don't know what they really mean. Because if you did it wouldn't be that hard to abide by them enough to show you understand them.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • cztheday:

      Softly seething, surreal breathing..
      Ignite the cannon with sphagnum lanthum..
      Laud the armies of diphthongs with your superannuating Diphtheria..
      And I will ever be your combustive tablature of igneous geometries.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Vierotchka
  • J_Jammer
  • Vierotchka
  • J_Jammer
  • samthesixth
  • RFIDemocracy
    • 0
      RFIDemocracy  
    • samthesixth:

      Free Screenings Tonight of "Capitalism" for the Jobless and Homeless in America's Hardest Hit Cities (plus local benefit premieres all across the country).

      Not bad for a "the rich white ahole capitalist"

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
1 - 100 of 129
more from Community:

top videos